Insulin Action In Brain Research Articles

Mixed nut consumption improves brain insulin sensitivity: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled, crossover trial in older adults with overweight or obesity

BackgroundImproving brain insulin sensitivity, which can be assessed by measuring regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) responses to intranasal insulin, may prevent age-related metabolic and cognitive diseases. ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate longer-term effects of mixed nuts on brain insulin sensitivity in older individuals with overweight/obesity. MethodsIn a randomized, single-blinded, controlled, crossover trial, 28 healthy adults (mean ± standard deviation: 65 ± 3 years; body mass index: 27.9 ± 2.3 kg/m2) received either daily 60-g mixed nuts (15 g of walnuts, pistachio, cashew, and hazelnuts) or no nuts (control) for 16 weeks, separated by an 8-week washout period. Throughout the study, participants were instructed to adhere to the Dutch food-based dietary guidelines. During follow-up, brain insulin action was assessed by quantifying acute effects of intranasal insulin on regional CBF using arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, effects on peripheral insulin sensitivity (oral glucose tolerance test), intrahepatic lipids, and cardiometabolic risk markers were assessed. ResultsBody weight and composition did not change. Compared with control, mixed nut consumption improved regional brain insulin action in 5 clusters located in the left (difference in CBF responses to intranasal insulin: −4.5 ± 4.7 mL/100 g/min; P < 0.001; −4.6 ± 4.8 mL/100 g/min; P < 0.001; and −4.3 ± 3.6 mL/100 g/min; P = 0.007) and right occipital lobes (−4.3 ± 5.6 mL/100 g/min; and −3.9 ± 4.9 mL/100 g/min; P = 0.028). A fifth cluster was part of the left frontal lobe (−5.0 ± 4.6 mL/100 g/min; P < 0.001). Peripheral insulin sensitivity was not affected. Intrahepatic lipid content (−0.7%-point; 95% CI: −1.3%-point to −0.1%-point; P = 0.027), serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration (−0.24 mmol/L; 95% CI: −0.44 to −0.04 mmol/L; P = 0.019), and systolic blood pressure (−5 mm Hg; 95% CI: −8 to −1 mm Hg; P = 0.006) were lower after the mixed nut intervention. ConclusionsLonger-term mixed nut consumption affected insulin action in brain regions involved in the modulation of metabolic and cognitive processes in older adults with overweight/obesity. Intrahepatic lipid content and different cardiometabolic risk markers also improved, but peripheral insulin sensitivity was not affected.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04210869.

Imaging the brain to assess brain insulin action

AbstractBackgroundEver since the brain was identified as an insulin‐sensitive organ, it was quickly appreciated that insulin action in the brain affects cognitive and metabolic processes [1]. Epidemiological evidence suggests a strong link between reduced peripheral insulin sensitivity and age‐related neurodegenerative processes, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [2].MethodCharacterization of brain insulin resistance in humans is challenging and relies on different neuroimaging methods in combination with insulin stimulation techniques. In my talk, I will focus on the administration of intranasal insulin, which has been established over the last decades to disentangle peripheral from brain insulin effects [1]. In combination with functional neuroimaging, I will show recent data on the quantification of brain insulin sensitivity non‐invasively in humans of different age and weight groups [3].ResultWe could show that intranasal insulin can affect region‐specific activity and functional connectivity of the human brain. These diverse central insulin responses largely depend on its action in the hypothalamus, amygdala, hippocampus, striatum and parts of the insula and prefrontal cortex and influences a variety of metabolic and cognitive processes [3]. Specifically, I will show that disrupted brain insulin action can result in increased accumulation of visceral fat and altered reward learning in persons at high risk to develop T2D [4], but also in healthy individuals after overconsumption of high caloric foods (unpublished). Moreover, I will show that the effect of intranasal insulin in the hippocampus decreases with age in women but not men and that brain insulin responsivity is affected by the menstrual cycle (unpublished). Moreover, just recently, we could link enhanced brain insulin action in the mesocorticolimbic circuitry with improved cognitive and metabolic functions [5].ConclusionAs brain insulin acts on striatal dopamine function and hippocampal plasticity, enhancing brain insulin action could lead to new treatment options in diabetes and aging‐associated diseases.

Brain insulin action in women.

Brain insulin action in women.

Sympathetic overdrive and unrestrained adipose lipolysis drive alcohol-induced hepatic steatosis in rodents

ObjectiveHepatic steatosis is a key initiating event in the pathogenesis of alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), the most detrimental organ damage resulting from alcohol use disorder. However, the mechanisms by which alcohol induces steatosis remain incompletely understood. We have previously found that alcohol binging impairs brain insulin action, resulting in increased adipose tissue lipolysis by unrestraining sympathetic nervous system (SNS) outflow. Here, we examined whether an impaired brain–SNS–adipose tissue axis drives hepatic steatosis through unrestrained adipose tissue lipolysis and increased lipid flux to the liver. MethodsWe examined the role of lipolysis, and the brain–SNS–adipose tissue axis and stress in alcohol induced hepatic triglyceride accumulation in a series of rodent models: pharmacological inhibition of the negative regulator of insulin signaling protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1β (PTP1b) in the rat brain, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) knockout mice as a pharmacogenetic model of sympathectomy, adipocyte specific adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) knockout mice, wildtype (WT) mice treated with β3 adrenergic agonist or undergoing restraint stress. ResultsIntracerebral administration of a PTP1b inhibitor, inhibition of adipose tissue lipolysis and reduction of sympathetic outflow ameliorated alcohol induced steatosis. Conversely, induction of adipose tissue lipolysis through β3 adrenergic agonism or by restraint stress worsened alcohol induced steatosis. ConclusionsBrain insulin resistance through upregulation of PTP1b, increased sympathetic activity, and unrestrained adipose tissue lipolysis are key drivers of alcoholic steatosis. Targeting these drivers of steatosis may provide effective therapeutic strategies to ameliorate ALD.

Brain insulin action on peripheral insulin sensitivity in women depends on menstrual cycle phase

Insulin action in the human brain modulates eating behaviour, whole-body metabolism and body fat distribution1,2. In particular, brain insulin action increases whole-body insulin sensitivity, but these studies were mainly performed in lean men3,4. Here we investigate metabolic and hypothalamic effects of brain insulin action in women with a focus on the impact of menstrual cycle (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03929419).Eleven women underwent four hyperinsulinemic–euglycemic clamps, two in the follicular phase and two in the luteal phase. Brain insulin action was introduced using nasal insulin spray5–7 and compared to placebo spray in a fourfold crossover design with change in glucose infusion rate as the primary endpoint. Here we show that during the follicular phase, more glucose has to be infused after administration of nasal insulin than after administration of placebo. This remains significant after adjustment for blood glucose and insulin. During the luteal phase, no significant influence of brain insulin action on glucose infusion rate is detected after adjustment for blood glucose and insulin (secondary endpoint). In 15 other women, hypothalamic insulin sensitivity was assessed in a within-subject design by functional magnetic resonance imaging with intranasal insulin administration8. Hypothalamus responsivity is influenced by insulin in the follicular phase but not the luteal phase.Our study therefore highlights that brain insulin action improves peripheral insulin sensitivity also in women but only during the follicular phase. Thus, brain insulin resistance could contribute to whole-body insulin resistance in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle.

302-OR: How Menstrual Cycle Impacts Brain Insulin Action—Results from Young Women

The human brain is an insulin-sensitive organ that modulates whole-body glucose metabolism and adiposity. In case of brain insulin resistance, this regulation is disturbed. In the periphery, insulin sensitivity varies along the menstrual cycle, while the effects on brain insulin action are still unknown. We here investigated the impact of menstrual cycle on brain insulin sensitivity of the human hypothalamus and on brain-derived modulation of peripheral metabolism. In 26 naturally cycling women (age 19-29 years, BMI 18-24 kg/m2), brain insulin action was assessed in both the follicular and the luteal phase using nasal application of 160 U insulin. In fifteen women, we assessed hypothalamic insulin responsiveness by functional MRI combined with nasal insulin. In eleven women, brain-derived modulation of peripheral insulin sensitivity was studied by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamps combined with insulin vs placebo spray. Only in the follicular phase, nasal insulin significantly decreased hypothalamic blood flow (p=0.02), indicating proper brain insulin action. In the luteal phase, insulin induced no such effect (p=0.6). During hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamps in the follicular phase, more glucose had to be infused after insulin compared to placebo spray. This difference remained significant after adjustment for circulating glucose and insulin (p&amp;lt;0.0001), which was not the case in the luteal phase (p=0.1). High estradiol/progesterone ratio, as present during the follicular phase, was linked to a stronger effect of insulin spray on glucose infusion rates than placebo. Brain insulin sensitivity is a regulated process that can rapidly adapt to changing physiologic requirements, as through the menstrual cycle. In the luteal phase, we detected hypothalamic insulin resistance, which likely contributed to the lacking modulation of peripheral insulin sensitivity through brain insulin delivery. Thus, brain insulin resistance could contribute to whole-body insulin resistance in the luteal phase. Disclosure J.Hummel: None. M.Roden: Advisory Panel; Eli Lilly and Company, Consultant; TARGET PharmaSolutions, Inc., Research Support; Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Sanofi. H.Häring: None. A.Fritsche: Advisory Panel; Novo Nordisk, Lilly, Sanofi, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, SYNLAB Holding Deutschland GmbH. A.Peter: None. R.Wagner: Advisory Panel; Daiichi Sankyo, Speaker's Bureau; Novo Nordisk, Sanofi. S.Kullmann: None. M.Heni: Advisory Panel; Boehringer-Ingelheim, Sanofi, Research Support; Boehringer Ingelheim Inc., Speaker's Bureau; Lilly, Bayer Inc., Sanofi, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Amryt Pharma Plc. C.Benkendorff: None. L.Fritsche: None. K.Prystupa: Other Relationship; Berlin-Chemie AG. A.Vosseler: None. S.Gancheva: Consultant; Novo Nordisk, Bayer Inc. S.Trenkamp: None. A.L.Birkenfeld: None. H.Preissl: None. Funding German Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Brain insulin responsiveness is linked to age and peripheral insulin sensitivity.

Insulin action in the brain influences cognitive processes, peripheral metabolism and eating behaviour. However, the influence of age and peripheral insulin sensitivity on brain insulin action remains unclear. We used intranasal administration of insulin and functional magnetic resonance imaging in a randomized, placebo-controlled within-subject design in 110 participants (54 women, body mass index 18-49 kg/m2 , age 21-74 years). Cerebral blood flow was measured before and after nasal spray application to assess brain insulin action. Peripheral insulin sensitivity was assessed by a five-point oral glucose tolerance test. Linear regressions were used to investigate associations between age and peripheral insulin sensitivity with brain insulin action in predefined region of interests (i.e. insulin-sensitive brain regions). We found significant negative associations between age and insulin action in the hippocampus (β = -0.215; p = .017) and caudate nucleus (β = -0.184; p = .047); and between peripheral insulin sensitivity and insulin action in the amygdala (β = -0.190, p = .023). Insulin action in the insular cortex showed an interaction effect between age and peripheral insulin sensitivity (β = -0.219 p = .005). Furthermore, women showed the strongest negative association between age and hippocampal insulin action, while men showed the strongest associations with peripheral insulin sensitivity and age in reward-related brain regions. We could show a region-specific relationship between brain insulin responsiveness, age and peripheral insulin sensitivity. Our findings underline the need to study brain insulin action in both men and women and further substantiate that brain insulin sensitivity is a possible link between systemic metabolism and neurocognitive functions.

Investigating the effects of antipsychotics on brain insulin action: Study protocol for a multi-modality magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study in healthy controls.

Antipsychotics (APs) are the cornerstone of treatment for schizophrenia (SCZ) but are unfortunately associated with serious metabolic adverse effects including weight gain and type 2 diabetes. The pathophysiology of AP-induced metabolic dysfunction is largely undetermined. Brain insulin resistance has been posited to be at the cross-roads of many cognitive and metabolic disorders, and disruption of central insulin action has emerged as a possible explanatory mechanism underlying AP induced metabolic dysfunction. Previous studies suggest that change in neuroimaging-based parameters with intranasal insulin administration can be leveraged to investigate brain insulin resistance. In this proof-of-concept study, we will utilize neural signatures of insulin action in the brain to examine if APs disrupt brain insulin signaling. It is hypothesized that: 1) intranasal insulin (INI), but not intranasal placebo (INP), will change cerebral blood flow and resting state connectivity, as well as increase glutamate levels in the striatum and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; 2) oral olanzapine (OLA), but not oral placebo (PL), will inhibit the effect of INI on these parameters. Thirty-two healthy volunteers will undergo a single blind, cross-over design, wherein all participants receive the following four treatment combinations, 2-6 weeks apart, in a random sequence: INP + PL, INP + OLA, INI + PL, and INI + OLA. Participants will undergo an MRI-based assay of brain insulin resistance 15 minutes after administering 160 IU INI or INP. The scanning protocol includes resting and task-based functional MRI, arterial spin labelling, and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Demonstrating that OLA can acutely induce brain insulin resistance is clinically relevant to metabolic health in SCZ. Evidence of brain insulin resistance induced by acute AP dosing can inform the early use of adjunctive insulin sensitizers for the treatment of metabolic comorbidities associated with AP treatment in severe mental illness. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT03741478.

Profound Sensitivity of the Liver to the Direct Effect of Insulin Allows Peripheral Insulin Delivery to Normalize Hepatic but Not Muscle Glucose Uptake in the Healthy Dog.

Endogenous insulin secretion is a key regulator of postprandial hepatic glucose metabolism, but this process is dysregulated in diabetes. Subcutaneous insulin delivery alters normal insulin distribution, causing relative hepatic insulin deficiency and peripheral hyperinsulinemia, a major risk factor for metabolic disease. Our aim was to determine whether insulin's direct effect on the liver is preeminent even when insulin is given into a peripheral vein. Postprandial-like conditions were created (hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, and a positive portal vein to arterial glucose gradient) in healthy dogs. Peripheral (leg vein) insulin infusion elevated arterial and hepatic levels 8.0-fold and 2.8-fold, respectively. In one group, insulin's full effects were allowed. In another, insulin's indirect hepatic effects were blocked with the infusion of triglyceride, glucagon, and inhibitors of brain insulin action (intracerebroventricular) to prevent decreases in plasma free fatty acids and glucagon, while blocking increased hypothalamic insulin signaling. Despite peripheral insulin delivery the liver retained its full ability to store glucose, even when insulin's peripheral effects were blocked, whereas muscle glucose uptake markedly increased, creating an aberrant distribution of glucose disposal between liver and muscle. Thus, the healthy liver's striking sensitivity to direct insulin action can overcome the effect of relative hepatic insulin deficiency, whereas excess insulin in the periphery produces metabolic abnormalities in nonhepatic tissues.

Brain insulin resistance and cognitive function: influence of exercise.

Exercise has systemic health benefits in people, in part, through improving whole body insulin sensitivity. The brain is an insulin-sensitive organ that is often underdiscussed relative to skeletal muscle, liver, and adipose tissue. Although brain insulin action may have only subtle impacts on peripheral regulation of systemic glucose homeostasis, it is important for weight regulation as well as mental health. In fact, brain insulin signaling is also involved in processes that support healthy cognition. Furthermore, brain insulin resistance has been associated with age-related declines in memory and executive function as well as Alzheimer's disease pathology. Herein, we provide an overview of brain insulin sensitivity in relation to cognitive function from animal and human studies, with particular emphasis placed on the impact exercise may have on brain insulin sensitivity. Mechanisms discussed include mitochondrial function, brain growth factors, and neurogenesis, which collectively help combat obesity-related metabolic disease and Alzheimer's dementia.

Evidence for preserved insulin responsiveness in the aging rat brain

Insulin appears to exert salutary effects in the central nervous system (CNS). Thus, brain insulin resistance has been proposed to play a role in brain aging and dementia but is conceptually complex and unlikely to fit classic definitions established in peripheral tissues. Thus, we sought to characterize brain insulin responsiveness in young (4–5 months) and old (24 months) FBN male rats using a diverse set of assays to determine the extent to which insulin effects in the CNS are impaired with age. When performing hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps in rats, intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion of insulin in old animals improved peripheral insulin sensitivity by nearly two-fold over old controls and comparable to young rats, suggesting preservation of this insulin-triggered response in aging per se (p < 0.05). We next used an imaging-based approach by comparing ICV vehicle versus insulin and performed resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) to evaluate age- and insulin-related changes in network connectivity within the default mode network. In aging, lower connectivity between the mesial temporal (MT) region and other areas, as well as reduced MT signal complexity, was observed in old rats, which correlated with greater cognitive deficits in old. Despite these stark differences, ICV insulin failed to elicit any significant alteration to the BOLD signal in young rats, while a significant deviation of the BOLD signal was observed in older animals, characterized by augmentation in regions of the septal nucleus and hypothalamus, and reduction in thalamus and nucleus accumbens. In contrast, ex vivo stimulation of hippocampus with 10 nM insulin revealed increased Akt activation in young (p < 0.05), but not old rats. Despite similar circulating levels of insulin and IGF-1, cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of these ligands were reduced with age. Thus, these data highlight the complexity of capturing brain insulin action and demonstrate preserved or heightened brain responses to insulin with age, despite dampened canonical signaling, thereby suggesting impaired CNS input of these ligands may be a feature of reduced brain insulin action, providing further rationale for CNS replacement strategies.

Hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia effects on anterior cingulate cortex myoinositol-relation to brain network functional connectivity in healthy adults.

Brain mechanisms underlying the association of diabetes metabolic disorders-hyperglycemia and insulin resistance-with cognitive impairment are unknown. Myoinositol is a brain metabolite involved in cell osmotic balance, membrane phospholipid turnover, and second messenger neurotransmission, which affect brain function. Increased brain myoinositol and altered functional connectivity have been found in diabetes, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's disease, but the independent effects of plasma glucose and insulin on brain myoinositol and function are not characterized. We measured myoinositol concentrations in the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a region involved in self-reflective awareness and decision making, using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and whole brain resting-state functional connectivity using fMRI, during acute hyperglycemia (with attendant hyperinsulinemia) and euglycemic-hyperinsulinemia compared with basal fasting-euglycemia (EU) in 11 healthy nondiabetic participants (5 women/6 men, means ± SD, age: 27 ± 7 yr, fasting-glucose: 5.2 ± 0.4 mmol/L, fasting-insulin: 4.9 ± 4.4 μU/mL). Brain MR data were acquired during two separate visits: 1) EU followed by a 60-min hyperglycemic-clamp (glucose: 10.7 ± 0.2 mmol/L, insulin: 33 ± 6 μU/mL); 2) EU followed by a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic-clamp (glucose: 5.3 ± 0.1 mmol/L, insulin: 27 ± 5 μU/mL) designed to match individual insulin levels achieved during the visit 1 hyperglycemic-clamp. Myoinositol decreased by 14% during the hyperglycemic-clamp (from 7.7 ± 1.5 mmol/kg to 6.6 ± 0.8 mmol/kg, P = 0.031), and by 9% during the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic-clamp (from 7.1 ± 0.7 mmol/kg to 6.5 ± 0.7 mmol/kg, P = 0.014), with no significant difference between the two clamps. Lower myoinositol was associated with higher functional connectivity of the thalamus and precentral cortex with insula-ACC-related networks, suggesting myoinositol is involved in insulin modulation of cognitive/emotional network function in healthy adults. Regional brain myoinositol levels may be useful biomarkers for monitoring cognitive and mood-enhancing treatment responses.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Hyperinsulinemia-related decreases of brain anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) myoinositol independent of plasma glucose levels and the association of low ACC myoinositol with increased functional connectivity between sensorimotor regions and ACC/insula-related networks suggest involvement of myoinositol in insulin-modulated brain network function in healthy adults. In diabetes, elevated brain myoinositol may be due to reduced brain insulin levels or action, rather than hyperglycemia, and may be involved in brain network dysfunctions leading to cognitive or mood disorders.

Acute inorganic nitrate intake increases regional insulin action in the brain: Results of a double-blind, randomized, controlled cross-over trial with abdominally obese men

AimsImproving brain insulin sensitivity may be a promising approach in the prevention and treatment of metabolic and cognitive diseases. Our aim was to investigate acute effects of inorganic nitrate on regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) responses to intranasal insulin in abdominally obese men. MethodsEighteen apparently healthy men, aged 18–60 years and with a waist circumference ≥ 102 cm, participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial. The study consisted of two test days separated by at least one week. Men received in random order a drink providing 10 mmol (i.e., 625 mg nitrate) potassium nitrate or an isomolar placebo drink with potassium chloride. Brain insulin action was assessed 120–150 min after the drinks by quantifying acute effects of nasal insulin on regional CBF using arterial spin labeling Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Glucose and insulin concentrations were measured at regular intervals, while blood pressure was determined fasted and at 240 min. ResultsInorganic nitrate intake increased regional insulin action in five brain clusters. The two largest clusters were located in the right temporal lobe (ΔCBF: 7.0 ± 3.8 mL/100 g/min, volume: 5296 mm3, P < 0.001; and ΔCBF: 6.5 ± 4.3 mL/100 g/min, volume: 3592 mm3, P < 0.001), while two other cortical clusters were part of the right frontal (ΔCBF: 9.0 ± 6.0 mL/100 g/min, volume: 1096 mm3, P = 0.007) and the left parietal lobe (ΔCBF: 6.1 ± 4.3 mL/100 g/min, volume: 1024 mm3, P = 0.012). One subcortical cluster was located in the striatum (ΔCBF: 5.9 ± 3.2 mL/100 g/min, volume: 1792 mm3, P < 0.001). No effects of nitrate were observed on CBF before administration. Following nitrate intake, circulating nitrate plus nitrite concentrations increased over time (P = 0.003), but insulin and glucose concentrations and blood pressure did not change. ConclusionAcute inorganic nitrate intake may improve regional brain insulin action in abdominally obese men. These regions are involved in the regulation of different metabolic and cognitive processes.The trial was registered on January 6th, 2021 at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04700241.

Brain insulin signalling in metabolic homeostasis and disease.

Insulin signalling in the central nervous system regulates energy homeostasis by controlling metabolism in several organs and by coordinating organ crosstalk. Studies performed in rodents, non-human primates and humans over more than five decades using intracerebroventricular, direct hypothalamic or intranasal application of insulin provide evidence that brain insulin action might reduce food intake and, more importantly, regulates energy homeostasis by orchestrating nutrient partitioning. This Review discusses the metabolic pathways that are under the control of brain insulin action and explains how brain insulin resistance contributes to metabolic disease in obesity, the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Insulin Action in the Brain regulates both Central and Peripheral Functions

The brain has traditionally thought to be insensitive to insulin, primarily because insulin does not stimulate glucose uptake/metabolism in the brain (as it does in classic insulin sensitive tissues such as muscle, liver and fat). However, over the past 20 years, research in this field has identified unique actions of insulin in the brain. There is accumulating evidence that insulin crosses into the brain and regulates central nervous system functions such as feeding, depression and cognitive behavior. Additionally, insulin acts in the brain to regulate systemic functions such as hepatic glucose production, lipolysis, lipogenesis, reproductive competence and the sympathoadrenal response to hypoglycemia. Decrements in brain insulin action (or brain insulin resistance) can be observed in obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD), indicating a possible link between metabolic and cognitive health. Here, we describe recent findings on the pleiotropic actions of insulin in the brain and highlight the precise sites, specific neuronal population and roles for supportive astrocytic cells through which insulin acts in the brain. In addition, we also discuss how boosting brain insulin action could be a therapeutic option for people at an increased risk of developing metabolic and cognitive diseases such as AD and T2DM. Overall, this perspective article serves to highlight some of these key scientific findings, identify unresolved issues, and indicate future directions of research in this field that would serve to improve the lives of people with metabolic and cognitive dysfunctions.

Central Acting Hsp10 Regulates Mitochondrial Function, Fatty Acid Metabolism, and Insulin Sensitivity in the Hypothalamus.

Mitochondria are critical for hypothalamic function and regulators of metabolism. Hypothalamic mitochondrial dysfunction with decreased mitochondrial chaperone expression is present in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Recently, we demonstrated that a dysregulated mitochondrial stress response (MSR) with reduced chaperone expression in the hypothalamus is an early event in obesity development due to insufficient insulin signaling. Although insulin activates this response and improves metabolism, the metabolic impact of one of its members, the mitochondrial chaperone heat shock protein 10 (Hsp10), is unknown. Thus, we hypothesized that a reduction of Hsp10 in hypothalamic neurons will impair mitochondrial function and impact brain insulin action. Therefore, we investigated the role of chaperone Hsp10 by introducing a lentiviral-mediated Hsp10 knockdown (KD) in the hypothalamic cell line CLU-183 and in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) of C57BL/6N male mice. We analyzed mitochondrial function and insulin signaling utilizing qPCR, Western blot, XF96 Analyzer, immunohistochemistry, and microscopy techniques. We show that Hsp10 expression is reduced in T2D mice brains and regulated by leptin in vitro. Hsp10 KD in hypothalamic cells induced mitochondrial dysfunction with altered fatty acid metabolism and increased mitochondria-specific oxidative stress resulting in neuronal insulin resistance. Consequently, the reduction of Hsp10 in the ARC of C57BL/6N mice caused hypothalamic insulin resistance with acute liver insulin resistance.

The Importance of the Mechanisms by Which Insulin Regulates Meal-Associated Liver Glucose Uptake in the Dog.

Hepatic glucose uptake (HGU) is critical for maintaining normal postprandial glucose metabolism. Insulin is clearly a key regulator of HGU, but the physiologic mechanisms by which it acts have yet to be established. This study sought to determine the mechanisms by which insulin regulates liver glucose uptake under postprandial-like conditions (hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, and a positive portal vein-to-arterial glucose gradient). Portal vein insulin infusion increased hepatic insulin levels fivefold in healthy dogs. In one group (n = 7), the physiologic response was allowed to fully occur, while in another (n = 7), insulin's indirect hepatic effects, occurring secondary to its actions on adipose tissue, pancreas, and brain, were blocked. This was accomplished by infusing triglyceride (intravenous), glucagon (portal vein), and inhibitors of brain insulin action (intracerebroventricular) to prevent decreases in plasma free fatty acids or glucagon, while blocking increased hypothalamic insulin signaling for 4 h. In contrast to the indirect hepatic effects of insulin, which were previously shown capable of independently generating a half-maximal stimulation of HGU, direct hepatic insulin action was by itself able to fully stimulate HGU. This suggests that under hyperinsulinemic/hyperglycemic conditions insulin's indirect effects are redundant to direct engagement of hepatocyte insulin receptors.

FXR in the dorsal vagal complex is sufficient and necessary for upper small intestinal microbiome-mediated changes of TCDCA to alter insulin action in rats

ObjectiveConjugated bile acids are metabolised by upper small intestinal microbiota, and serum levels of taurine-conjugated bile acids are elevated and correlated with insulin resistance in people with type 2 diabetes....

150-OR: Brain Insulin Sensitivity Is Modulated by Menstrual Cycle

Insulin action in the human brain modulates whole-body metabolism by increasing peripheral insulin sensitivity and suppressing endogenous glucose production. In brain insulin resistance, this modulatory function of the brain is impaired. Experimental evidence from rodents and first observations in humans suggest major differences in brain insulin action between women and men. We therefore investigated effects of brain insulin delivery on peripheral metabolism in the follicular and luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Eleven natural cycling women (age: 19-29 years, BMI: 17.8 - 23.8 kg/m²) underwent four hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps. On two days during both the follicular and the luteal cycle phase, participants received intranasal insulin spray and placebo 90 min after initiation of the 210 min clamp in randomized, blinded order. Insulin spillover into the blood was mimicked by an appropriate iv insulin bolus on placebo days. The phase of the menstrual cycle interacted with the type of spray on the subsequent change of glucose infusion rates (GIR) (p=0.01). During the follicular phase, more glucose had to be infused after insulin delivery to the brain as nasal spray compared to placebo administration (p&amp;lt;0.0001; β=0.40±0.06). This difference remained significant after adjustment for plasma glucose and insulin concentrations (p&amp;lt;0.0001). During the luteal phase, GIR were only transiently higher after nasal insulin (p=0.005; β=0.16±0.06), but this depended on the circulating glucose and insulin levels as the difference was no longer present after respective adjustments (p=0.1). In the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, insulin delivery to the brain improves peripheral insulin sensitivity in lean women, comparable to what has previously been described in lean men. However, this response was not detected in the luteal phase, suggesting brain insulin resistance. Brain insulin resistance could therefore contribute to the long known peripheral insulin resistance in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Disclosure C.F.C. Benkendorff: None. J. Hummel: None. A. Vosseler: None. S. Kullmann: None. L. Fritsche: None. A.L. Birkenfeld: None. H. Preissl: None. H. Haering: None. A. Fritsche: None. A. Peter: None. R. Wagner: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Other Relationship; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Heni: Research Support; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Funding German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (01GI0925)

148-OR: Empagliflozin Improves Insulin Sensitivity of the Hypothalamus in Humans with Prediabetes

Insulin action in the human brain reduces food intake, improves whole-body insulin sensitivity, and modulates adiposity. In most cases of obesity and diabetes, the brain becomes insulin resistant with impaired brain-derived modulation of peripheral metabolism. As treatment with the SGLT2-inhibitor empagliflozin not only improves glucose metabolism but also reduces body weight and cardiovascular risk, we hypothesized that improved brain insulin sensitivity could be involved. Methods: In this double blind study, 40 participants with prediabetes (according to ADA’s OGTT criteria) were 1:1 randomized to receive 25 mg empagliflozin qd or placebo (mean ± SD: age: 60 ± 9 years; BMI: 31.5 ± 3.8 kg/m²). Before and after 8 weeks of treatment, brain insulin sensitivity was assessed by functional MRI combined with the intranasal administration of insulin to the brain. Results: In healthy persons, intranasal insulin administration significantly decreases cerebral blood flow in the hypothalamus. In the current study, volunteers with prediabetes were unresponsive to this, as insulin could not induce hypothalamic inhibition prior treatment. We identified a significant interaction between treatment and the hypothalamic response to insulin (p&amp;lt;0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons). Post-hoc analyses showed that only participants on empagliflozin showed a significant insulin-induced decrease in hypothalamic blood flow after treatment. The group receiving placebo showed no such improvement. Conclusion: Our current results corroborate insulin resistance of the human hypothalamus in humans with prediabetes. Treatment with empagliflozin for 8 weeks was able to restore hypothalamic insulin sensitivity; a favorable response that could contribute to the positive effects of SGLT2 inhibitors. These findings reveal that brain insulin resistance is treatable by pharmacological interventions with potential benefits for cognition, adiposity, and whole-body metabolism. Disclosure M. Heni: Research Support; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. S. Kullmann: None. R. Wagner: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Other Relationship; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. J. Hummel: None. C. Dannecker: None. A. Vosseler: None. L. Fritsche: None. K. Kantartzis: None. J. Machann: None. H. Haering: None. A. Fritsche: None. H. Preissl: None. Funding Boehringer Ingelheim