Insular Onset Research Articles

Using pre-surgical suspicion to guide insula implantation strategy

RationaleInsular epilepsy can be a challenging diagnosis due to overlapping semiology and scalp EEG findings with frontal, temporal, and parietal lobe epilepsies. Stereotactic electroencephalography (sEEG) provides an opportunity to better localize seizure onset. The possibility of improved localization is balanced by implantation risk in this vascularly rich anatomic region. We review both safety and pre-implantation factors involved in insular electrode placement across four years at an academic medical center. MethodsPresurgical data, operative reports, and invasive EEG summaries were retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing invasive epilepsy monitoring on the insula from 2016 through 2019. EEG reports were reviewed to record the presence of insula ictal and interictal involvement. We recorded which presurgical findings suggested insular involvement (insula lesion on MRI, insula changes on PET/SPECT/scalp EEG, characteristic semiology, or history of failed anterior temporal lobectomy). The likelihood of pre-sEEG insular onset was categorized as low suspicion if no presurgical findings were present (“rule out”), moderate suspicion if one finding was present, and high suspicion if two or more findings were present. Results76 patients received 189 insular electrodes as part of their implantation strategy for 79 surgical cases. Seven patients (8.9%) had insular ictal onset. One clinically significant complication (left hemiparesis) occurred in a patient with moderate suspicion for insular onset. There were 38 low suspicion cases, 36 moderate suspicion cases, and 5 high suspicion cases for pre-sEEG insula ictal onset. Two low suspicion (5.3%), three moderate suspicion (8.6%), and two high suspicion (40%) cases had insular ictal onset. ConclusionsThe insula can safely receive sEEG. Having two or more presurgical factors indicating insular onset is a strong, albeit incomplete, predictor of insular seizure onset. Using pre-implantation clinical findings can offer clinicians predictive value for targeting the insula during invasive EEG monitoring.

Insula in epilepsy – “untying the gordian knot”: A systematic review

PurposeDespite significant advances in epileptology, there are still many uncertainties about the role of the insula in epilepsy. Until recently, most insular onset seizures were wrongly attributed to the temporal lobe. Further, there are no standardised approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of insular onset seizures. This systematic review gathers the available information about insular epilepsy and synthesizes current knowledge as a basis for future research. MethodAdhering to the PRISMA guidelines, studies were meticulously extracted from the PubMed database. The empirical data pertaining to the semiology of insular seizures, insular networks in epilepsy, techniques of mapping the insula, and the surgical intricacies of non-lesional insular epilepsy were reviewed from published studies. The corpus of information available was then subjected to a process of concise summarization and astute synthesis. ResultsOut of 235 studies identified for full-text review, 86 studies were included in the systematic review. The insula emerges as a brain region with a number of functional subdivisions. The semiology of insular seizures is diverse and depends on the involvement of particular subdivisions. The semiological heterogeneity of insular seizures is explained by the extensive connectivity of the insula and its subdivisions with all four lobes of the brain, deep grey matter structures, and remote brainstem areas. The mainstay of the diagnosis of seizure onset in the insula is stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). The surgical resection of the insular epileptogenic zone (when possible) is the most effective treatment. Open surgery on the insula is challenging but magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) also holds promise. ConclusionThe physiological and functional roles of the insula in epilepsy have remained obfuscated. The dearth of precisely defined diagnostic and therapeutic protocols acts as an impediment to scientific advancement. This review could potentially facilitate forthcoming research endeavours by establishing a foundational framework for uniform data collection protocols, thereby enhancing the feasibility of comparing findings across future studies and promoting progress in this domain.

Frame-based and robot-assisted insular stereo-electroencephalography via an anterior or posterior oblique approach.

There is an increasing interest in stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) for invasive evaluation of insular epilepsy. The implantation of insular SEEG electrodes, however, is still challenging due to the anatomical location and complex functional segmentation in both an anteroposterior and ventrodorsal (i.e., superoinferior) direction. While the orthogonal approach (OA) is the shortest trajectory to the insula, it might insufficiently cover these networks. In contrast, the anterior approach (AOA) or posterior oblique approach (POA) has the potential for full insular coverage, with fewer electrodes bearing a risk of being more inaccurate due to the longer trajectory. Here, the authors evaluated the implantation accuracy and the detection of epilepsy-related SEEG activity with AOA and POA insular trajectories. This retrospective study evaluated the accuracy of 220 SEEG electrodes in 27 patients. Twelve patients underwent a stereotactic frame-based procedure (frame group), and 15 patients underwent a frameless robot-assisted surgery (robot group). In total, 55 insular electrodes were implanted using the AOA or POA considering the insular anteroposterior and ventrodorsal functional organization. The entry point error (EPE) and target point error (TPE) were related to the implantation technique (frame vs robot), the length of the trajectory, and the location of the target (insular vs noninsular). Finally, the spatial distribution of epilepsy-related SEEG activity within the insula is described. There were no significant differences in EPE (mean 0.9 ± 0.6 for the nonsinsular electrodes and 1.1 ± 0.7 mm for the insular electrodes) and TPE (1.5 ± 0.8 and 1.6 ± 0.9 mm, respectively), although the length of trajectories differed significantly (34.1 ± 10.9 and 70.1 ± 9.0 mm, repsectively). There was a significantly larger EPE in the frame group than in the robot group (1.5 ± 0.6 vs 0.7 ± 0.5 mm). However, there was no group difference in the TPE (1.5 ± 0.8 vs 1.6 ± 0.8 mm). Epilepsy-related SEEG activity was detected in 42% (23/55) of the insular electrodes. Spatial distribution of this activity showed a clustering in both anteroposterior and ventrodorsal directions. In purely insular onset cases, subsequent insular lesionectomy resulted in a good seizure outcome. The implantation of insular electrodes via the AOA or POA is safe and efficient for SEEG implantation covering both anteroposterior and ventrodorsal functional organization with few electrodes. In this series, there was no decrease in accuracy due to the longer trajectory of insular SEEG electrodes in comparison with noninsular SEEG electrodes. The results of frame-based and robot-assisted implantations were comparable.

Insular Magnetoencephalography Dipole Clusters in Patients With Refractory Focal Epilepsy.

The clinical significance of magnetoencephalography (MEG) dipole clusters in the insular region in patients with focal epilepsy, when present in conjunction with MEG dipole clusters in other regions of the brain is not known. All patients (adult and pediatric) with MEG dipole clusters involving the insula were retrospectively evaluated. Patients who underwent any form of surgical intervention were included in the study. Data obtained included age, sex, seizure characteristics, MRI brain, EEG, MEG, intracranial EEG, type of intervention, and seizure outcomes. Twenty-four patients (12 adults and 12 pediatric) were included. Eight patients had one staged intervention and 16 had intracranial evaluation. Ten of 11 patients (91%) with insular coverage by stereotactic EEG had interictal insular spikes, and 5 of 11 patients (45%) had ictal onset from the insula. Combined Engel (I & II) outcomes were seen in five patients with resections/ablations involving the insula MEG dipole clusters as compared with eight patients where the insular MEG dipole clusters were not resected/ablated. Insular MEG dipole clusters identified on surface MEG correlated with interictal spikes in intracranial stereotactic electrode contacts in the insula. The presence of insular MEG dipole clusters, however, does not definitively imply a primary insular onset epilepsy.

A study of perfusion changes with Insula Epilepsy using SPECT

PurposeThe non-invasive localisation of insular lobe epilepsy is a challenge. We aimed to determine if ictal SPECT is a reliable adjunctive test in insular cases and to explore its role in the tailoring of intracranial strategies. MethodFrom a dataset of patients who underwent SEEG between December 2012 and December 2016, we collected patients with focal insular onset epilepsy. We examined semiology, EEG, PET and SPECT hyperperfusion pattern with SISCOM. We also reviewed relevant literature. Results5 patients were identified, 4 females, from a dataset of 51 patients. Median age of seizure onset was 8 years old (8 months to 10 years). All patients had an ictal SPECT during pre-surgical work-up: median injection time was 7 s (3–17 sec) from clinical onset, and median seizure duration was 42 s (11–85 sec). Insula cortex showed focal hyperaemia in four patients, all bilateral, with the greatest hyperperfusion contralateral to the ictal onset in two cases, using SISCOM threshold at 1.5 standard deviation. Other sites with hyperaemia included basal ganglia and middle temporal gyrus. The SEEG confirmed insular onset seizures in all the cases. All patients had epilepsy surgery and were seizure free at 21 to 50 months follow up. The results from the literature review showed frequent hyperperfusion in structures outside insula and frequently over the contralateral hemisphere. ConclusionsThis study highlights the technical limitations of SPECT when attempting to assess seizures arising from the insula. Our findings and the literature show ictal SPECT can be localising but falsely lateralising in seizures arising from the insula.

F122. Non-lesional eating epilepsy with mesial temporal and inferior insular onset: A stereo-EEG study

Introduction Reflex epilepsy is characterized by seizures that are triggered by internal or external stimuli. Based on the complexity of the trigger, the reflex epilepsies can be subdivided into simple and complex. Eating Epilepsy (EE) is a subtype of the complex reflex epilepsies and represents a heterogeneous electro-clinical syndrome. The body of literature on EE consists mostly of a few case series with variable medical and surgical outcomes. We present a case of non-lesional EE with excellent outcome from resective epilepsy surgery after an extensive pre-surgical investigation to identify of the seizure onset zone (SOZ). Methods We retrospectively evaluated a case of drug-resistant eating-induced seizures referred for pre surgical assessment at London Health Sciences Centre Epilepsy Program, London, Canada. Patient’s data was reviewed including clinical history, neurological exam, imaging (Brain MRI and FDG-PET), neuropsychology assessment, scalp video-EEG, Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and the surgical management. Results A 34-year-old gentleman has a 4-year history of seizures characterized by diffuse tingling sensation followed by loss of awareness with staring and right hand automatisms that lasted 1–2 min. 90% of his seizures were observed to be induced by eating at the beginning of a meal. His neuropsychological testing was essentially normal. Scalp video-EEG showed independent bilateral temporal spikes (R > L). Five eating-induced seizures were recorded immediately after initiation of eating with 2–3 Hz rhythmic activity over the right temporal region with perisylvian spreading. Brain MRI and PET studies were normal. Based on the electro-clinical data, the working hypothesis was right perisylvian onset of the seizures. The patient underwent intracranial recordings with stereo-EEG sampling the right temporal pole, amygdala, hippocampus, parietal operculum, temporal operculum and insula. Five seizures were captured induced by eating with stereotypical electrographic onset involving the right amygdala and hippocampus and inferior insula. Extra operative cortical stimulation (1–3.5 mA) elicited many prolonged after discharges in the same regions but they did not provoke clinical seizures. The patient thus underwent a right anterior temporal lobectomy and partial inferior insulectomy with decortication of the posterior short insular gyrus & the anterior and posterior gyri. Pathology revealed transcortical and hippocampal gliosis. He remained seizure-free (Engel 1) at his 8 months post-surgical follow-up. Conclusion This case of a drug-resistant non-lesional EE illustrates the value of stereo-EEG in the presurgical work-up that led to seizure-freedom following combined right anterior temporal lobectomy and right inferior insula resection. In non-lesional cases of drug-resistant EE, the epileptogenic zone is likely wide and it requires stereo-EEG to determine the SOZ.

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy as treatment for intractable insular epilepsy in children.

OBJECTIVE Seizure onset within the insula is increasingly recognized as a cause of intractable epilepsy. Surgery within the insula is difficult, with considerable risks, given the rich vascular supply and location near critical cortex. MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LiTT) provides an attractive treatment option for insular epilepsy, allowing direct ablation of abnormal tissue while sparing nearby normal cortex. Herein, the authors describe their experience using this technique in a large cohort of children undergoing treatment of intractable localization-related epilepsy of insular onset. METHODS The combined epilepsy surgery database of Cook Children's Medical Center and Dell Children's Hospital was queried for all cases of insular onset epilepsy treated with LiTT. Patients without at least 6 months of follow-up data and cases preoperatively designated as palliative were excluded. Patient demographics, presurgical evaluation, surgical plan, and outcome were collected from patient charts and described. RESULTS Twenty patients (mean age 12.8 years, range 6.1-18.6 years) underwent a total of 24 LiTT procedures; 70% of these patients had normal findings on MRI. Patients underwent a mean follow-up of 20.4 months after their last surgery (range 7-39 months), with 10 (50%) in Engel Class I, 1 (5%) in Engel Class II, 5 (25%) in Engel Class III, and 4 (20%) in Engel Class IV at last follow-up. Patients were discharged within 24 hours of the procedure in 15 (63%) cases, in 48 hours in 6 (24%) cases, and in more than 48 hours in the remaining cases. Adverse functional effects were experienced following 7 (29%) of the procedures: mild hemiparesis after 6 procedures (all patients experienced complete resolution or had minimal residual dysfunction by 6 months), and expressive language dysfunction after 1 procedure (resolved by 3 months). CONCLUSIONS To their knowledge, the authors present the largest cohort of pediatric patients undergoing insular surgery for treatment of intractable epilepsy. The patient outcomes suggest that LiTT can successfully treat intractable seizures originating within the insula and offers an attractive alternative to open resection. This is the first description of LiTT applied to insular epilepsy and represents one of only a few series describing the use of LiTT in children. The results indicate that seizure reduction after LiTT compares favorably to that after conventional open surgical techniques.

Insular epilepsy surgery.

Since it was originally described nearly 70years ago, insular epilepsy has been increasingly recognized and may explain failures after apparently well-planned operations. We review the history of awareness of the phenomenon, techniques for its assessment, and its surgical management. Insular epilepsy can mimic features of frontal, parietal, or temporal seizures. It should be considered when a combination of somatosensory, visceral, and motor symptoms is observed early in a seizure. Extraoperative intracranial recordings are required to accurately diagnose insular seizures. Stereo-electroencephalography (EEG) or craniotomy with implantation of surface and depth electrodes have been used successfully to identify insular onset of seizures. Surgical resection of an insular focus may be performed with good success and acceptable risk.

Orbitofrontal and Insular Epilepsy

Orbitofrontal and insular epilepsy are difficult to recognize because clinical presentations are variable and surgical approaches remain difficult. Literature review and review of our own case series including selected cases regarding the clinical manifestation and diagnostic utility of diagnostic tests in orbitofrontal and insular epilepsy. Orbitofrontal epilepsy presents with either frontal lobe type seizures with hypermotor automatism or temporal lobe type seizures with oroalimentary and manual automatisms depending on the spread pattern. Ictal single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and other functional imaging can be helpful, but intracranial electroencephalograms (EEGs) are still required to identify orbitofrontal seizure onset. Insular epilepsy presents with throat constriction and unilateral paresthesias. Preoperative functional imaging methods can be helpful, but exploration of the insula is required to identify unequivocal insular onset. Intracranial EEG in the insula can be performed safely and should be considered in atypical temporal lobe cases. Intracranial EEG remains the main diagnostic modality to identify orbitofrontal and insular epilepsy. Newer diagnostic modalities such as high-frequency oscillations, EEG, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), magnet resonance spectroscopy, and magnet source imaging need to be examined further to establish their diagnostic utility.

A hypermotor seizure with a focal orbital frontal lesion originating in the insula: A case report

We present herein the case of a patient with a focal orbital frontal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), but an insular onset of seizures. A 15-year-old boy suffered from hypermotor seizures for 9 years. In his seizures, he initially had a sensation that sounds were distant, and then his consciousness became impaired. After a short period of tonic activity, violent activities occurred, such as kicking or gripping some objects and shaking. MRI showed a focal cortical abnormality in the right orbital frontal lobe. [(18)F]FDG-PET revealed diffuse hypometabolism in the right frontal lobe, especially in the same site as the cortical lesion on MRI. The seizure onset zone was localized in the right anterior insula by intracranial recording. A resection of the right anterior insula and a partial disconnection of the frontal lobe were performed, rendering the patient seizure-free.