Inpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Research Articles

Outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and adverse events.

In recent years, orthopaedic procedures have increasingly shifted from inpatient to outpatient settings. This trend includes total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), which is being performed more frequently in outpatient facilities and ambulatory surgical centres. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and rates of adverse events between outpatient and inpatient TSA. PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1-20) databases were screened for articles comparing outpatient to inpatient TSA through June 2024, using relevant and holistic search terms. Non-comparative articles and those utilizing national databases were excluded from our study. Data on complications, myocardial infarction (MI), thromboembolic events, anaemia/transfusions, infections, readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, revision surgery, and patient reported outcome measures at one year (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score) were extracted. A total of 14 articles were included in our study, involving 1070 outpatient and 1330 inpatient TSA patients. Patients in the inpatient group were older and had a higher ASA compared to the patients in the outpatient group. The outpatient TSA group was found to have significantly lower rates of overall complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, p = 0.001), medical complications (OR = 0.43, p < 0.001), and readmissions (OR = 0.47, p = 0.008), as well as higher mean ASES scores (81.4 vs. 78.5, p = 0.01) when compared to the inpatient TSA group. There were no significant differences in rates of ED visits (p = 0.27), revisions (p = 0.06), and VAS scores (p = 0.15) between inpatient and outpatient TSA groups. TSAs performed in the outpatient setting had a lower rate of overall adverse events, medical complications, readmissions, and a higher ASES score compared to inpatient TSAs. However, since patients in the inpatient group had higher ASA and were older, our results support the safety of the outpatient TSA based on the current selection criteria.

Poster 149: Supplemental Testosterone Increases Risk of Reoperation after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Objectives: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are devastating complications after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). While it has been shown that increased serum testosterone levels may increase the concentration of skin flora, it is unknown how this correlates clinically with the risk of infection/reoperation. Therefore, we sought to evaluate if supplemental testosterone increases the risk of infection and reoperation after TSA. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 448 males who underwent TSA between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2021 who were prescribed supplemental testosterone within 1 year prior to TSA using a commercial claims database. These patients were matched 1:5 to 2240 patients who were not prescribed supplemental testosterone based on year of TSA, age, geographical region, inpatient or outpatient TSA, and comorbidities within 30 days preoperatively including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, obesity, smoking, alcohol abuse, and Charleson Comorbidity Index (CCI) using Mahalanobis nearest neighbor matching. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. Significance was set at p &lt; 0.05. Results: Patients prescribed supplemental testosterone were younger (mean = 60.5 versus 61.3 years old, p = 0.04), but otherwise demographics were similar between cohorts (Table 1). Mean follow-up was 1.5 years. At 2 years postoperatively, patients prescribed testosterone had a higher cumulative incidence for reoperation for infection at 2.0% compared to 0.9% for those who were not prescribed testosterone (p = 0.04). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that preoperative supplemental testosterone (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.03-6.6, p=0.04), diabetes (OR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.1-7.9, p=0.04), and alcohol abuse (OR = 11.4, 95% CI=2.2-60.1, p = 0.004) were risk factors for reoperation for infection (Table 2). At 2 years postoperatively, patients prescribed testosterone had a higher cumulative incidence for overall reoperation at 9.6% compared to 4.0% for those who were not prescribed testosterone (p &lt; 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that supplemental testosterone was found to be risk factor for overall reoperation (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.3-3.2, p = 0.001) (Table 3). Conclusions: Patients prescribed supplemental testosterone had a higher risk of all cause reoperation and reoperation for infection after TSA. Further research is needed to understand the mechanism by how testosterone increases the risk of reoperation after TSA.

Same-day discharge vs. inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: an age stratified comparison of postoperative outcomes and hospital charges

As the number of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) procedures increases, there is a growing interest in improving patient outcomes, limiting costs, and optimizing efficiency. One approach has been to transition these surgeries to an outpatient setting. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to conduct an age-stratified analysis comparing the 90-day postoperative outcomes of primary TSA in the same-day discharge (SDD) and inpatient (IP) settings with a specific focus on the super-elderly. This retrospective study included all patients who underwent primary anatomic or reverse TSA between January 2018 and December 2021 in ambulatory and IP settings. The outcome measures included length of stay (LOS), complications, hospital charges, emergency department (ED utilization), readmissions, and reoperations within 90 days following TSA. Patients with LOS ≤8hours were considered as SDD, and those with LOS >8hours were considered as IP. P<.05 was considered statistically significant. There were 121 and 174 procedures performed in SDD and IP settings, respectively. There were no differences in comorbidity indices between the SDD and IP groups (American Society of Anesthesiologists score P=.12, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index P=.067). The SDD cohort was younger than the IP group (SDD 67.0years vs. 73.0 IP years, P<.001), and the SDD group higher rate of intraoperative tranexamic acid use (P=.015) and lower estimated blood loss (P=.009). There were no differences in 90-day overall minor (P=.20) and major complications (P=1.00), ED utilization (P=.63), readmission (P=.25), or reoperation (P=.51) between the SDD and IP groups. When stratified by age, there were no differences in overall major (P=.80) and minor (P=.36) complications among the groups. However, the LOS was directly correlated with increasing age (LOS=8.4hours in ≥65 to<75-year cohort vs. LOS=25.9hours in ≥80-year cohort; P<.001). There were no differences in hospital charges between SDD and IP primary TSA in all 3 age groups (P=.82). SDD TSA has a shorter LOS without increasing postoperative major and minor complications, ED encounters, readmissions, or reoperations. Older age was not associated with an increase in the complication profile or hospital charges even in the SDD setting, although it was associated with increased LOS in the IP group. These results suggest that TSA can be safely performed expeditiously in an outpatient setting.

Comparing comorbidity burden between patients undergoing ambulatory rotator cuff repair vs. inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundRotator cuff repair (RCR) patients routinely undergo same-day discharge in an ambulatory setting, while anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) cases have historically been performed in an inpatient hospital setting. For healthier patients, however, TSA has increasingly transitioned to same-day discharge. Understanding whether a true difference in comorbidity burden exists between these patient groups would inform the appropriateness of outpatient TSA in an ambulatory setting. MethodsA retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing primary TSA and same-day, ambulatory RCR performed between September 2017 and May 2021 at a single institution by 3 fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons. Selected sociodemographic factors and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (30 variables) were used to summarize and compare comorbidity burden. Only patients >50 year old were included. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis testing was used to compare the prevalence or severity for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Results1433 cases met inclusion criteria, including 146 (34%) primary inpatient TSAs and 287 (66%) ambulatory RCRs. There were few differences in comorbidity burden between TSA and RCR, with TSA having a significantly higher prevalence for only 4 Elixhauser comorbidities and RCR having a higher prevalence of 1 comorbidity, although none survive a Bonferroni correction. TSA patients had a significantly higher prevalence of uncomplicated (P = .04192) and complicated hypertension (P = .0336), chronic pulmonary disease (P = .0045), and cardiac arrhythmia (P = .0031). The prevalence of diabetes (P = .029758) was significantly higher among RCR patients. Additionally, age (P = .011) was significantly higher among TSA patients. Of the TSA cohort, there were 10 incidences (1%) of 90-day readmission whereas there were 14 incidences (5%) of 90-day readmissions after RCR. ConclusionOverall, few differences in the prevalence of individual comorbidities (and sociodemographic parameters) existed between patients undergoing outpatient RCR and inpatient primary anatomic TSA. Comorbidities with larger differences can be either optimized preoperatively or managed chronically, and given these similarities, TSA may be similarly appropriate for ambulatory settings, particularly as efficiencies in operative time and improvements in regional anesthesia continue to evolve.

Outpatient Versus Inpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis of Postoperative Complications, Surgical Outcomes, and Reimbursements.

There has been a trend toward performing arthroplasty in the ambulatory setting. The primary purpose of this study was to compare outpatient and inpatient total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) for postoperative medical complications, healthcare utilization outcomes, and surgical outcomes. Patients who underwent outpatient TSA or inpatient TSA with a minimum 5-year follow-up were identified in the PearlDiver database. These cohorts were propensity-matched based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, smoking status, and obesity (body mass index > 30). All outcomes were analyzed using chi square and Student t-tests where appropriate. Outpatient TSA patients had markedly lower rates of various 90-day medical complications. Outpatient TSA patients had lower risk of aseptic loosening at 2 years postoperation and lower risk of periprosthetic joint infection at 5 years postoperation relative to inpatient TSA patients. Outpatient TSA reimbursements were markedly lower than inpatient TSA reimbursements at the 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year postoperative intervals. This study found patients undergoing outpatient TSA to be at lowers odds for both postoperative medical and surgical complications compared with those undergoing inpatient TSA. Despite increased risk of postoperative healthcare utilization for readmissions and emergency department visits, outpatient TSA was markedly less expensive at every postoperative time point assessed.

Outpatient vs. inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: complication rates, clinical outcomes, and eligibility parameters

Improvements in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), fast-track surgery, multimodal anesthesia, and rehabilitation protocols have opened up the possibility of outpatient care that is now routinely practiced at our European institution. The first objective of this study was to define the TSA outpatient population and to verify that outpatient management of TSA does not increase the risk of complications. The second objective was to determine patient eligibility parameters and the third was to compare functional outcomes and identify influencing factors. The study included 165 patients who had primary TSA (106 outpatient and 59 inpatient procedures). The operative technique was the same for both groups. Demographics, complications, readmissions, and revisions were collected. American Society of Anesthesiologists, Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California Los Angeles shoulder, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores were obtained preoperatively and at 1.5, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Satisfaction and visual analog scale pain scores also were documented. Statistical analysis was completed using multivariate linear regression. Outpatients were significantly younger and had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores than inpatients. The rates of complications, readmissions, and reoperations were not significantly different between groups. Outpatient surgery was not an independent risk factor for complications. At 1.5 months, better outcomes were noted in the outpatient group for all scores, and these reached statistical significance. Distance to home, dominant side, operative time, and blood loss were not associated with functional results. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that outpatient care was significantly associated with improved scores at 1.5 months and did not affect functional outcomes at 6 and 12 months. This study reports the results of routine outpatient TSA within a European healthcare system. TSA performed in an outpatient setting was not an independent risk factor for complications and seemed to be an independent factor in improving early functional results.

Higher volume surgeons have lower 1-year postoperative cost after total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundThe relationship between total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) volume and overall postoperative cost is unclear. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of surgeon volume on total 1-year postoperative costs. MethodsAn observational cohort study was performed utilizing Marketscan databases. Patients undergoing inpatient TSAs between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2019 were included. Patients with ICD-10 Diagnosis codes of trauma, fracture, or shoulder cancer were excluded. Surgeon volume was calculated as the maximum annual volume between 2017 and 2018. The primary outcome was total 1-year postoperative costs, including revision and nonoperative costs. Secondary outcomes were rates of revision and nonoperative procedures. ResultsThe analyzed study population consisted of 2216 patients from 1255 surgeons. Patients operated on by high-volume surgeons were more likely to be older, live in the Northeast and/or metropolitan area, and to have a reverse TSA performed. Total 1-year postoperative costs were lower for high-volume surgeons with an inverse relationship with surgeon volume (high: $1925 medium: $1715, low: $1193, P < .001). Physical therapy rates (high: 76.7%, medium: 82.0%, low: 86.6%, P < .001) and costs (high: $1223, medium: $1655, low: $1870, P < .001) were lowest for high-volume surgeons. ConclusionHigh-volume surgeons were associated with lower 1-year postoperative costs with revisions and physical therapy (PT) as the main driver of these costs. These improved outcomes may reflect surgeon skill and experience. Further research is necessary to establish standardized guidelines for postoperative PT regimen.

Patient outcomes after revision total shoulder arthroplasty in an inpatient vs. outpatient setting.

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is becoming an increasingly common surgical procedure for numerous shoulder conditions. The incidence of revision TSA is increasing because of the increase in primary TSA and the increased utilization of TSA in younger patients. Conducting revision TSA as an outpatient procedure would be beneficial in limiting expenditure and resource allocation but must show a similar complication profile compared to inpatient revision TSA in order to justify its clinical value. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of outpatient revision TSA to inpatient revision TSA and outpatient primary TSA. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried from 2010-2019 to identify all patients who underwent revision TSA (n=1456) in either an inpatient or outpatient setting, as well as patients who underwent primary TSA in an outpatient setting (n=2630). Relevant demographic characteristics were compared between the outpatient revision group and both the inpatient revision and outpatient primary groups. Postoperative complications, readmission, and reoperation rates were also compared between the groups. Patients undergoing inpatient revision TSA exhibited increased rates of preoperative hypertension (P=.013) and had increased prevalence of severe American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (P=.021) compared to patients undergoing outpatient revision TSA. Patients undergoing outpatient revision TSA were significantly more likely to experience complications (P<.001), have longer surgical times (P<.001), and undergo readmission (P=.006) and reoperation (P=.049) compared to patients undergoing outpatient primary TSA. There was no significant increase in rates of overall complication, readmission, or reoperation between patients undergoing revision TSA in an outpatient vs. an inpatient setting. Outpatient revision TSA has higher complication rates, readmission, and reoperation rates compared to outpatient primary TSA, similar to previous findings when comparing revision and primary TSA done as an inpatient. However, there was no increased risk of complications, readmission, or reoperation for outpatient revision TSA compared to inpatient revision TSA. Outpatient revision TSA should be considered by orthopedic surgeons in patients who are medically healthy to undergo the procedure as an outpatient surgery.

Perioperative pain control represents the primary concern for patients considering outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a survey-based study.

Outpatient (OP) total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with same-day discharge can now be performed safely in appropriately selected patients. Patient knowledge and perspectives regarding OP TSA are yet unknown and such information may inform surgeon decision-making and provide a framework for addressing patient concerns. The goal of this study was to understand and quantify patient knowledge of and concerns for OP TSA, with a working hypothesis that majority of patients are unaware of OP TSA as a realistic option and that their primary concern would be postoperative pain control. This was a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care academic medical center including patients who underwent anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty and completed an OP TSA expectations questionnaire/survey. This survey was provided preoperatively and included demographic factors, self-rated health evaluation, and perioperative expectations. Surveys evaluated whether patients undergoingTSA had any prior awareness of OP TSA and evaluated their primary concern with same-day discharge. Secondary questions included an assessment of patient expectations of outcomes of outpatient vs. inpatient surgery as well as their expected length of inpatient stay. A total of 122 patients who underwent anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty completed the questionnaire and comprised the study cohort. Fifty-two (42.6%) of the patients were unaware that OP TSA was an option, and 26 (50%) of these were comfortable with the idea of OP TSA. Comfort with OP TSA was significantly associated with higher subjective patient-reported health status. Fifty-eight patients (47.5%) expected that following TSA they would require <24 hours of in-hospital postoperative care. The primary concern for patients considering OP TSA was postoperative pain control, endorsed by 44.3% of patients, compared with 13.1% of patients stating this would be their primary concern if admitted as an inpatient postoperatively. Pain control being a primary concern was significantly different between those considering outpatient vs. inpatient TSA. Most patients anticipated that OP shoulder arthroplasty would lead to a better (36%) or comparable (53%) outcome, whereas only 11% had concerns that it would lead to a worse outcome. Expanding OP TSA crucially depends on awareness and education. Perceived ability to control pain is an importantconcern. Patients may benefit from preoperative counseling, including emphasizing a comprehensive postoperative pain management strategy.

Body mass index is a predictor of discharge to a postacute care facility following total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on discharge to a postacute care (PAC) facility following elective total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). MethodsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify adult patients (>18 years old) who underwent inpatient TSA for primary osteoarthritis between 2005 and 2018. Hemiarthroplasty, revision TSA, trauma indications, and outpatient procedures were excluded. Patient and perioperative data were identified. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the relationship between BMI and discharge to PAC facilities. ResultsA total of 10,198 patients with a primary TSA were identified. The majority (93%) of patients were discharged home vs. 7% to PAC facilities. Patients discharged to PAC had significantly higher mean BMI (P = .006). After controlling for demographic and comorbid factors, BMI was the only modifiable risk factor that was independently associated with an increased risk of discharge to a PAC. For every increase in BMI point, there was an increased risk of discharge to a PAC by 2.9% (odds ratio [OR] 1.029, confidence interval [CI] 1.016-1.041, P < .001). Additional covariates associated with PAC discharge were older age (OR 1.113, CI 1.099-1.127, P < .001), female gender (OR 3.037, CI 2.489-3.705, P < .001), and dependent functional status (OR 8.322, CI 5.544-12.492, P < .001). ConclusionMost patients undergoing TSA were discharged home following surgery. While age, sex, and functional status also affect disposition, elevated BMI is the only modifiable risk factor that independently predicts PAC discharge. Consideration of patient BMI prior to elective TSA may greatly improve discharge planning and management of patient expectations.

Inpatient versus outpatient shoulder arthroplasty outcomes: A propensity score matched risk-adjusted analysis demonstrates the safety of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty

ObjectivesBeginning January 1, 2021 total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) was removed from the Medicare (U.S national healthcare for patients ≥ 65years of age) inpatient-only list. Furthermore, there is limited data comparing outpatient and inpatient TSA among recent contemporary large population databases. This study aimed to analyze shoulder arthroplasty outcomes between inpatient and outpatient procedures at the national level. MethodsThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was utilized (2015–2019). Cases with a current procedural terminology of 23472 indicative of primary TSA and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were included (N = 22,452). Outcomes were then analyzed in two approaches: unmatched analysis and propensity score matched risk-adjusted analysis. ResultsOverall, 9.7% (N = 2,185) of cases were performed outpatient and 90.3% (N = 20,357) of cases were performed inpatient. The rate of outpatient procedures has been steadily increasing (2015: 8.3%, 2016: 14.7%, 2017: 15.8%, 2018: 26.5%, 2019: 34.6%; P < 0.001). Outpatients were more likely to be male (50.7% vs. 43.7%) and younger (age < 65; 37.0% vs. 27.9%) and less likely to be ASA class 3 or 4 (49.5% vs. 58.3%). Outpatients had fewer comorbidities including obesity (46.1% vs. 51.9%), hypertension (60.5% vs. 67.4%), diabetes (15.1 vs. 18.2%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4.8% vs. 7.0%), bleeding disorders (1.3% vs. 2.5%), or chronic steroid use (3.5% vs. 5.0%; all P < 0.001). In a non-risk matched analysis of outcomes, outpatient procedures displayed lower rates of any adverse event (3.5% vs. 5.3%; P < 0.001), minor adverse events (1.5% vs. 3.0%; P = 0.001), and readmission (2.2% vs. 2.8%; P = 0.025). Following a propensity score matched analysis, two risk matched cohorts of outpatient (N = 2,172) and inpatient (N = 2,172) procedures were identified. Subsequent analysis of outcomes revealed no significant differences in outcome metrics between risk-matched outpatient and inpatient procedures. ConclusionsFrom 2015 to 2019, there has been a four-fold increase in the proportion of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty cases in the ACS-NSQIP database. This study shows that outpatient shoulder arthroplasty may be safely performed in a select cohort of patients without increased risk of adverse events. After adjusting for comorbidities, there were no differences in clinical outcomes or rates of adverse outcomes between inpatient and outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Level of evidenceRetrospective Observational Study, Level IV.

No significant difference in risk of prolonged opioid use following outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A propensity matched analysis.

The purpose of this investigation was to compare rates of filled opioid prescriptions and prolonged opioid use in opioid naïve patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in inpatient versus outpatient settings. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a national insurance claims database. Inpatient and outpatient cohorts were created by identifying continuously enrolled, opioid naïve TSA patients. A greedy nearest-neighbor algorithm was used to match baseline demographic characteristics between cohorts with a 1:1 inpatient to outpatient ratio to compare the primary outcomes of filled opioid prescriptions and prolonged opioid use following surgery between cohorts. A total of 11,703 opioid naïve patients (mean age 72.5 ± 8.5 years, 54.5% female, 87.6% inpatient) were included for analysis. After propensity score matching (n = 1447 inpatients; n = 1447 outpatients), outpatient TSA patients were significantly more likely to fill an opioid prescription in the perioperative window compared to inpatients (82.9% versus 71.5%, p < 0.001). No significant differences in prolonged opioid use were detected (5.74% inpatient versus 6.77% outpatient; p = 0.25). Outpatient TSA patients were more likely to fill opioid prescriptions compared to inpatient TSA patients. The quantity of opioids prescribed and rates of prolonged opioid use were similar between the cohorts. Therapeutic Level III.

Trends in outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty over time.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the safety of outpatient and inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and to investigate changes over time.MethodsPatients undergoing primary TSA during 2006-2019 as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were identified. Patients were divided into an early cohort (2006-2016, 12,401 patients) and a late cohort (2017-2019, 12,845 patients). Outpatient procedures were defined as those discharged on the day of surgery. Patient comorbidities and rate of adverse events within 30 days postoperatively were compared with adjustment for baseline characteristics using standard multivariate regression.ResultsThere was a significant reduction in complications over time when considering all cases (5.69% in the early cohort vs. 3.67% in the late cohort, adjusted relative risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-0.73, P < .001). The rate of complications decreased over time among inpatients (5.80% vs. 3.90%, adjusted RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.60-0.76, P < .001). However, there was no difference in the rate of complications among outpatients over time (1.98% vs. 1.38%, adjusted RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.28-1.47, P = .293). There were significantly more complications among inpatients vs. outpatients in both the early and late cohorts (early: 5.80% vs. 1.98%, adjusted RR = 2.57, 95% CI = 1.24-5.34, P = .011, late: 3.90% vs. 1.38%, adjusted RR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.39-3.74, P = .001). TSA became more common in elderly patients over 70 years of age over time in both the inpatient and outpatient cohorts, whereas fewer young patients (aged 18-59 years) underwent TSA in the late cohorts than in the early cohorts for both the inpatient and outpatient samples (P < .001).ConclusionThe overall complication rate of TSA has decreased over time as outpatient TSA has become increasingly common. When contemporary data are examined, the complication rate of outpatient procedures has remained constant over time while that of inpatient procedures decreased, despite the changing demographics of patients undergoing TSA. This indicates that outpatient TSA remains a safe procedure as patient selection criteria have evolved, while the safety of inpatient TSA continues to improve.

Outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A cost and outcome comparison in a comorbidity matched analysis

BackgroundPrevious studies comparing total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (TSA/RSA) are subject to surgeon selection bias. This study objective is to compare the outcomes and cost of outpatient TSA/RSA to inpatient TSA/RSA. Methods108,889 elective inpatient and outpatient TSA/RSA from Medicare claims data (2016–2018). 90-day readmission and total 90-day costs were compared following propensity score matching. ResultsYounger and healthier patients are receiving outpatient TSA/RSA. Outpatient TSA/RSA was associated with fewer 90-day readmissions (OR 0.48 CI 0.38–0.59, p < 0.001) and lower 90-day costs (−20.1% CI -19.1%; −21.1%, p < 0.001). ConclusionsOutpatient TSA/RSA surgery offers lower complication rates and total costs. Level of evidenceIII.

Safety and Cost Effectiveness of Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Changes in healthcare policy have driven many hospital-based surgeries to the outpatient environment. Multiple studies have shown outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a safe alternative to the inpatient setting. This systematic review evaluates patient selection, perioperative protocols, complications, costs, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes of outpatient TSA and compares these with their inpatient counterparts. The Emnbase, Medline, and CENTRAL databases were queried on April 30, 2020, for outpatient TSA studies, identifying 232 articles, with 21 meeting inclusion criteria. This involved 25,808 and 231,408 patients undergoing outpatient and inpatient TSA, respectively. Failed same-day discharge, readmissions, revision surgeries, cost, and complications among outpatient TSA were aggregated when raw numbers were available. Statistical significance for comparisons among outpatient and inpatient TSA within individual studies was alpha = 0.05. Ten studies evaluated same-day discharge rate, with 440 of 446 patients (98.7%) meeting the goals. Fourteen studies evaluated readmissions, revision surgeries, and complications, with readmissions in 238 of 6,133 patients (3.9%), revision surgeries in 32 of 1,484 patients (2.1%), and complications in 376 of 4,977 patients (7.6%). Readmission rates were similar between inpatients and outpatients, with only one study finding more readmissions after inpatient TSA. Complications were more common in inpatient TSA in five studies. Outpatient TSA demonstrated a charge reduction of $25,509 to $53,202 per patient, and patient satisfaction after outpatient TSA was "good to excellent" in more than 95% of patients. Patient selection for outpatient TSA used patient age, medical comorbidities, social support, living proximity to location of surgery, and lack of preoperative opioid use. Outpatient TSA in appropriately selected patients is a safe and cost-effective alternative to inpatient TSA. However, the literature is limited to national database or small retrospective studies. Large prospective, cohort studies are necessary to further assess differences in complication profiles between outpatient and inpatient TSA. Level IV; systematic review.

Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Evaluating Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness.

Orthopaedic surgical procedures are increasingly being performed in outpatient settings. The drive for cost reduction without compromising patient safety and outcomes has increased interest in outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The primary aim of this study was to perform a review of the evidence regarding the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of outpatient TSA. A search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed using several keywords: "outpatient," "shoulder replacement," "ambulatory," "day case," "day-case," "shoulder arthroplasty," "same day," and "shoulder surgery." Studies that were published from May 2010 to May 2020 in the English language were considered. Research design, questions, and outcomes were recorded for each study. Qualitative and quantitative pooled analysis was performed on the data where appropriate. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. Six retrospective studies compared complication rates between inpatient and outpatient cohorts and found no significant differences. Four studies found that the complication rate was lower in the outpatient cohort compared with the inpatient cohort. In a pooled analysis, the readmission rate after outpatient TSA was significantly lower than the readmission rate after inpatient TSA at 30 days (0.65% vs. 0.95%) and 90 days (2.03% vs. 2.87%) postoperatively (p < 0.05 for both). Four studies evaluated the cost of outpatient TSA in comparison with inpatient TSA. All of these studies found that TSA at an ambulatory surgery center was significantly less costly than TSA at an inpatient facility, both for the health-care system and for the patient. Patient selection for outpatient TSA may depend on several important factors, including the presence or absence of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, poor functional status, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, chronic narcotic use, higher body mass index, and older age. Our results show that patient selection is the most critical factor that predicts the success of outpatient TSA. While outpatient TSA is significantly less costly than inpatient TSA, patients undergoing outpatient TSA are more likely to be healthier than patients undergoing inpatient TSA. More high-quality long-term studies are needed to add to this body of evidence. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is outpatient shoulder arthroplasty safe in patients aged ≥65 years? A comparison of readmissions and complications in inpatient and outpatient settings.

Recent studies indicate that outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is cost-effective and may have a low complication rate similar to inpatient TSA. However, existing studies have included younger patient cohorts who typically possess fewer medical comorbidities. Patients aged ≥65 years are commonly enrolled in Medicare, which has traditionally designated TSA as an inpatient-only procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical complication rates and 90-day readmission rates between inpatient and outpatient TSA performed in adults aged ≥65 years. Medical records for all patients aged ≥65 years who underwent primary anatomic or reverse TSA by a single surgeon from July 2015 to May 2020 were reviewed. Patients were preselected for outpatient or inpatient surgery based on lack of significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities and patient preference. Demographics, body mass index (BMI), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores were collected in addition to emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions within 90 days of the index surgery. Relationships among frequency and types of complications and surgical setting (inpatients vs. outpatient) were assessed. Complication rates and demographic variables between inpatient and outpatient procedures were compared. Logistic regressions were performed to account for interacting predictor variables on the odds of having complications. A total of 145 shoulders (138 patients; 95 male, 43 female) were included in the analysis, of which 98 received inpatient TSA and 47 received outpatient TSA. Average age was 75.5 ± 7.2 for inpatient TSA and 70.5 ± 4.5 for outpatient TSA (P < .001). Patient age (P < .001), ASA score ≥3 (P < .001), and reverse TSA (P = .002) were significantly positively correlated with receiving inpatient surgery. There were 16 complications (16.3%) in the inpatient group and 9 complications (19.1%) in the outpatient group (P = .648). There were no significant differences in the frequency of postoperative complications, return to the ED, or reoperations between inpatient and outpatient procedures (P > .05). Each 1-year increase in age increased the predicted odds of having a surgical complication by 14% (odds ratio = 1.14; P = .021), irrespective of surgical setting. Those who underwent inpatient TSA had a significantly higher frequency of 90-day readmission (inpatient=16, outpatient=1; P = .034). Postoperative complications and ED returns were not significantly different between inpatient and outpatient TSA. Each 1-year increase in age increased the odds of postoperative surgical complications by 14%, regardless of surgical setting. Outpatient TSA was found to be safe for appropriately selected patients aged ≥65 years, and re-evaluation of TSA as an inpatient-only procedure should be considered.

Hospital Readmission Rates Following Outpatient Versus Inpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is an alternative to surgery with inpatient admission for appropriate patients. Controlled studies assessing differences in perioperative outcomes between inpatient and outpatient TSA are lacking. In this study, the primary outcome was 30-day all-cause hospital readmission following inpatient vs outpatient TSA. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to identify patients undergoing both primary and revision TSA from 2010 to 2017. Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create two groups of patients, those who underwent outpatient surgery and those who underwent inpatient surgery, while matching for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, primary vs revision surgery, smoking, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and congestive heart failure. This study had a power of 85% to detect a difference of 1% in 30-day readmission. Following 1:1 propensity score matching, 1714 patients who underwent inpatient TSA and 1714 patients who underwent outpatient TSA were analyzed. All-cause 30-day readmission rates were 3.4% in the outpatient group and 1.7% in the inpatient group (P<.01). A total of 1.9% of patients who underwent outpatient surgery had a 30-day readmission for a surgical complication compared with 1.4% of patients who underwent inpatient surgery (P=.32). Although patients who underwent outpatient TSA had an increased risk of all-cause 30-day readmission compared with equally matched controls who underwent inpatient TSA, readmission for surgical complications was equivalent between the two groups. Careful patient selection for outpatient TSA should be emphasized to minimize the potential for postoperative hospital admission. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):e173-e178.].

Day case versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

A number of papers have been published comparing the safety and efficacy of day case and inpatient anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. However, no systematic review of the literature has been published to date. The aim of this review was to determine if day case total shoulder arthroplasty (length of stay <24 h) leads to similar outcomes as standard-stay inpatients (length of stay ≥24 h). The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviewers were queried for publications utilizing keywords that were pertinent to total shoulder arthroplasty, day case, outpatient and inpatient, clinical or functional outcomes, and complications. In order to determine the quantitative impact of day case total shoulder arthroplasty on readmission and revision rate, a meta-analysis was performed on articles that observed 30- or 90-day readmission or revision. Eight articles were found to be suitable for inclusion in the present study which included 6103 day case total shoulder arthroplasty and 147,463 inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty. Following meta-analysis, there was no significant difference among patients who underwent day case total shoulder arthroplasty compared to inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty regarding revision rates (OR: 1.001; 95% CI: 0.721-1.389; p = 0.995) and 30-day readmission rates (OR: 0.940; 95% CI: 0.723-1.223; p = 0.646). In contrast, patients who underwent day case total shoulder arthroplasty were less likely to have a readmission within 90 days compared to their inpatient counterparts (OR: 0.839; 95% CI: 0.704-0.999; p = 0.049). Two out of eight studies reported comparable baseline clinical characteristics among groups, while five studies reported significant differences and one study did not provide information regarding clinical characteristics, such as medical comorbidities or American Society of Anaesthesiologists'(ASA) score. No significant difference among groups was found in all or almost all studies regarding mortality rates, and rates of cardiac complications, cerebrovascular events, thromboembolic events, pulmonary complications, cardiac complications, and nerve complications. Finally, results were rather conflicting regarding the correlation of day case total shoulder arthroplasty to the rate of surgical site infections. This study showed that day case total shoulder arthroplasty might lead to similar rates of mortality, complications, revisions, and readmissions compared to inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty when used in a selected population of younger, healthier, and more male patients. In contrast, there was no consensus regarding the impact of day case total shoulder arthroplasty on the rate of surgical site infections. Finally, further research of higher quality is required to establish patient demographic criteria, ASA score, or comorbidity index cut off that might be used to define day case-treated patients who seem to have equivalent outcomes compared to inpatient-treated patients.Level of evidence: Systematic review of level III studies (lowest level included).

Day case vs inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Day case total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a novel approach, not widely practiced in Europe. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients comparing elective day case and inpatient TSAs in our United Kingdom centre. To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of day case TSA compared to standard inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty. All patients undergoing TSA between January 2017 and July 2018 were included. Outcome measures were: Change in abduction and extension 3 mo postoperatively; 30-d postoperative adverse events and re-admissions in day case and inpatient groups. We also conducted an economic evaluation of outpatient arthroplasty. Multivariate linear and logistic regression were used to adjust for demographic and operative covariates. Fifty nine patients were included, 18 d cases and 41 inpatients. There were no adverse events or re-admissions at 30 d postoperatively in either group. There were no significant differences in adjusted flexion (mean difference 16.4, 95%CI: 17.6-50.5, P = 0.337) or abduction (mean difference: 13.2, 95%CI: 18.4-44.9, P = 0.405) postoperatively between groups. Median savings with outpatient arthroplasty were £529 (interquartile range: 247.33-789, P < 0.0001). Day case TSA is a safe, effective procedure, with significant cost benefit. Wider use may be warranted in the United Kingdom and beyond, with potential for significant cost savings and improved efficiency.