Inpatient-only List Research Articles

Prediction of overnight stay following shoulder arthroplasty utilizing machine learning

BackgroundTotal shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) has evolved from requiring extended inpatient hospital stays to favoring same-day discharges, influenced by improved surgical techniques, patient optimization, and the risks associated with inpatient stays. The removal of TSA from Medicare's inpatient-only list in 2021 underscores this shift. However, the need for accurate prediction of post-TSA admission remains, as hospital admissions are costly and linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Machine learning algorithms offer potential advantages over traditional predictive models by identifying complex, nonlinear relationships. This study aimed to demonstrate and compare the performance of commonly used machine learning algorithms to predict overnight hospital stay (OHS) admission. MethodsThis study used data from the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program 2021 database to analyze patients who underwent primary, elective TSA. Patients were divided into short hospital stay of 0-1 days and OHS of >1 day cohorts. Machine learning models, including Random Forest, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Gradient Boosted Tree, Naïve Bayes, and Support Vector Machine, were trained and validated to predict OHS. The models' predictive capacities were compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, calibration, and decision curve analysis. ResultsOut of 5811 patients analyzed, 926 (15.9%) were discharged on the same day. The ANN model demonstrated the highest area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.811), indicating superior predictive ability. Important variables influencing OHS predictions included operative time, body mass index, functional status, and patient demographics, such as age, race, and home support. Machine learning models showed better predictive performance than multivariate logistic regression. ConclusionMachine learning models, particularly the ANN model, outperform traditional regression methods in predicting post-TSA admission, highlighting their utility in optimizing patient selection for outpatient surgery. These models identify important variables associated with increased risk of OHS, aiding in preoperative planning and patient counseling. Integrating machine learning into clinical practice may enhance surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction while reducing health-care costs.

Maryland’s Global Budget Revenue Payment Model and Shifts in the Surgical Site of Care Among Medicare Beneficiaries

Objective: To assess the association between the Global Budget Revenue (GBR) payment model and shifts to the outpatient setting for surgical procedures among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in Maryland versus control states. Summary Background Data: The GBR model provides fixed global payments to hospitals to reduce spending growth and incentivize hospitals to reduce the costs of care while improving care quality. Since surgical care is a major contributor to hospital spending, the GBR model might accelerate the ongoing shift from the inpatient to the outpatient setting to generate additional savings. Methods: A difference-in-differences (DiD) design was used to compare changes in surgical care settings over time from pre-GBR (2011-2013) to post-GBR (2014-2018) for Maryland versus control states for common surgeries that could be performed in the outpatient setting. A cross-sectional approach was used to compare the difference in care settings in 2018 for total knee arthroplasty which was on Medicare’s Inpatient-Only List before then. Results: We studied 47,542 surgical procedures from 44,410 beneficiaries in Maryland and control states. GBR’s 2014 implementation was associated with an acceleration in the shift from inpatient to outpatient settings for surgical procedures in Maryland (DiD: 3.9 percentage points, 95% CI: 2.3, 5.4). Among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in 2018, the proportion of outpatient surgeries in Maryland was substantially higher than that in control states (difference: 27.6 percentage points, 95% CI: 25.6, 29.6). Conclusions: Implementing Maryland’s GBR payment model was associated with an acceleration in the shift from inpatient to outpatient hospital settings for surgical procedures.

Risk Factors of Failure to Discharge Before “Two Midnights” in Outpatient-Designated Total Hip Arthroplasty

Introduction: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services removed total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the inpatient-only list but continued to classify admissions as inpatient if they include two midnights, complicating care if an outpatient THA requires extended hospitalization. This study evaluates risk factors of patients undergoing outpatient-designated THA with a length of stay (LOS) ≥ 2 days. Methods: A total of 17,063 THA procedures designated as outpatient in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2015 and 2020 were stratified by LOS < 2 days (n = 2,294, 13.4%) and LOS ≥ 2 days (n = 14,765, 86.6%). Demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared by univariate analysis. Multivariable regression analysis identified predictors of LOS ≥ 2 days. Results: Outpatients with extended LOS were older (mean 65.3 vs. 63.5 years; P < 0.01); were more likely to have body mass index (BMI) > 35 (24.0 vs. 17.8%; P < 0.01); and had higher incidences of smoking (15.1% vs. 10.3%; P < 0.01), diabetes (15.4% vs. 9.9%; P < 0.01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (4.4% vs. 2.3%; P < 0.01), and hypertension (57.6% vs. 49.2%; P < 0.01). Patients with LOS ≥ 2 days had a higher incidence of surgical site infection (P < 0.01), hospital readmission (P < 0.01), and revision surgery (P < 0.01) over 30 days. Multivariable analysis demonstrated advanced age, female sex, African American race, Hispanic ethnicity, diabetes, smoking, and hypertension were independent risk factors for LOS ≥ 2 days. Conclusion: Despite removal from the inpatient-only list, a subset of outpatient THA remains at risk of an extended LOS. This study informs surgeons on the relevant risk factors of extended stay, enabling early inpatient preauthorization.

The Removal of Total Knee Arthroplasty From the Inpatient-Only List has Improved Patient Optimization.

On January 1, 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services removed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the inpatient-only (IPO) list, expanding outpatient TKA (oTKA) to include patients with insurance coverage through their programs. These regulatory changes reinforced the need for preoperative optimization to ensure a safe and timely discharge after surgery. This study compared modifiable preoperative optimization metrics in patients who underwent oTKA pre-IPO and post-IPO removal. The authors hypothesized that patients post-IPO removal would demonstrate improvement in the selected categories. Outpatient TKA in a national database was identified and stratified by surgical year (2015 to 2017 versus 2018 to 2020). Preoperative optimization thresholds were established for the following modifiable risk factors: albumin, hematocrit, sodium, smoking, and body mass index. The percentage of patients who did not meet thresholds pre-IPO and post-IPO removal were compared. In total, 2,074 patients underwent oTKA from 2015 to 2017 compared with 46,480 from 2018 to 2020. Patients undergoing oTKA after IPO removal were significantly older (67.0 versus 64.4 years; P < 0.01). A lower percentage of patients in the post-IPO cohort fell outside the threshold for all modifiable risk factors. Results were significant for preoperative sodium (10.7% versus 8.8%; P < 0.01), body mass index (12.4% versus 11.0% P = 0.05), and smoking history (9.9% versus 6.6%; P < 0.01). Outpatient TKA has increased considerably post-IPO removal. As this regulatory change has allowed older patients with increased comorbidities to undergo oTKA, the need for appropriate preoperative optimization has increased. The current data set demonstrates that surgeons have improved preoperative optimization efforts for select modifiable risk factors.

Trends in the Adoption of Outpatient Joint Arthroplasties and Patient Risk: A Retrospective Analysis of 2019 to 2021 Medicare Claims Data.

Total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) have recently been shifting toward outpatient arthroplasty. This study aims to explore recent trends in outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures and examine whether patients with a higher comorbidity burden are undergoing outpatient arthroplasty. Medicare fee-for-service claims were screened for patients who underwent total hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty procedures between January 2019 and December 2022. The procedure was considered to be outpatient if the patient was discharged on the same date of the procedure. The Hierarchical Condition Category Score (HCC) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores were used to assess patient comorbidity burden. Patient adverse outcomes included all-cause hospital readmission, mortality, and postoperative complications. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate if higher HCC/CCI scores were associated with adverse patient outcomes. A total of 69,520, 116,411, and 41,922 respective total knee, hip, and shoulder arthroplasties were identified, respectively. Despite earlier removal from the inpatient-only list, outpatient knee and hip surgical volume did not markedly increase until the pandemic started. By 2022Q4, 16%, 23%, and 36% of hip, knee, and shoulder arthroplasties were discharged on the same day of surgery, respectively. Both HCC and CCI risk scores in outpatients increased over time ( P < 0.001). TJA procedures are shifting toward outpatient surgery over time, largely driven by the COVID-19 pandemic. TJA outpatients' HCC and CCI risk scores increased over this same period, and additional research to determine the effects of this should be pursued. Level III, therapeutic retrospective cohort study.

Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty Volume up Nearly 8-Fold After Regulatory Changes With Expanding Demographics and Unchanging Outcomes: A 10-Year Analysis

BackgroundWith the removal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the inpatient-only (IPO) lists, the orthopedic landscape across the United States has changed rapidly. Thus, this study aimed to: 1) characterize the change in THA volume for outpatient and inpatient surgeries; 2) elucidate demographical differences before and after removal from the IPO list; and 3) analyze 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations. MethodsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for primary THAs between January 2010 and December 2021. The primary outcome was the annual volume of outpatient and inpatient THAs. Secondary outcomes involved 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations. The variables between cohorts were analyzed using goodness-of-fit Chi-square tests with summary statistics. ResultsOf the 332,423 THAs between 2010 and 2021, 88% were inpatient THAs (n = 292,974) and 12% were outpatient THAs (n = 39,449). From 2019 to 2021, the volume of inpatient THA decreased by 55% (42,779 to 19,075), while outpatient THA increased by 751% (2,518 to 21,424). Patients who had a THA after 2019 were older (P < .001), more commonly women (P < .001), white (P < .001), and more likely American Society of Anesthesiologists Class III (P < .001). The outpatient cohort had fewer 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations. The length of stay for both cohorts decreased until 2019, before increasing in 2020 and 2021 for inpatient THAs, while home discharge and operative time increased for both. ConclusionsThe volume of outpatient THA increased almost eightfold after its removal from the IPO lists in 2020. Despite expanding eligibility with older patients and more comorbidities, 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations remain low. These findings support the safe transition to outpatient THA with appropriate patient selection and optimization.

The Immediate Impact of Total Knee Arthroplasty Removal From the Medicare Inpatient-Only List on Patient Derived Functional Outcomes and Hospital Satisfaction

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the standard of treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. On January 1, 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) officially removed TKA from their inpatient-only list. The clinical impact of this change is not fully understood yet. MethodsElectronic records were retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent TKA between January 1 to June 30, 2017, or January 1 to June 30, 2018. Patients completed Function and Outcomes Research for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement surveys which assessed patient reported outcomes prior to and following TKA. Hospital statistics for the 2 time points were determined and compared. This was a single institution study resulting in 351 patients in the pre-CMS change group and 350 patients in the post-CMS change group. ResultsAnalysis of the pre-CMS and post-CMS transition cohorts indicated no significant difference in activities of daily living (ADLs), pain, or pain catastrophizing scale preoperatively or 12-months postoperatively. Additionally, there was no difference in the median change between preoperative and postoperative ADL scores (P = .866), yet pain scores approached significance with a P value of .054. The pre-CMS transition group stayed significantly longer in the hospital postoperatively and was more commonly discharged to a skilled nursing facility. No difference was seen in 30-day readmission rates (P = .253). ConclusionsResults showed that patients had similar scores for ADL, quality of life, pain, and pain catastrophizing 12-months following their TKA. Movement of TKA from the Medicare inpatient only list did not have an immediate negative impact for patient reported outcomes and 30-day readmissions at our institution in the 6-month transition period.

Same-Day Total Joint Arthroplasty in the United States From 2016 to 2020: The Impact of the Medicare Inpatient Only List and the COVID-19 Pandemic

BackgroundSame-day total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continue to gain popularity in the United States. The present study sought to quantify recent same-day outpatient trends taking into consideration the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the removal of these procedures from the Medicare inpatient only (IPO) list. MethodsPatients undergoing primary elective TKA and THA were identified using the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and the National Inpatient Sample from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. The same-day cohort included Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and National Inpatient Sample patients with a length of stay = 0 days. The inpatient cohort included patients with length of stay ≥1 day. National estimates were extrapolated using weight functions. ResultsFrom January 2016 to December 2020, the proportion of same-day TKA increased from 1.2 (719) to 62.4% (31,293) and the proportion of same-day THA increased from 2.0 (599) to 54.5% (18,252). Following removal from the Medicare IPO list, same-day TKAs increased from 3.2% (1,895) in December 2017 to 13.8% (9,269) in January 2018, and same-day THAs increased from 10.7% (4,295) in December 2019 to 22.5% (8,708) in January 2020. Between February and March 2020, same-day TKAs increased from 42.4 (26,148) to 44.4% (16,972) and same-day THAs increased from 28.5 (10,729) to 30.2% (7,409). ConclusionsThe proportion of same-day TKA and THA dramatically increased following removal from the Medicare IPO list and in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. By December 2020, same-day TKA and THA accounted for >50% of all cases performed in the United States.

How have the Volume and Backlog of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Cases Changed during the COVID-19 Pandemic?

BACKGROUND As COVID-19 rapidly propagated, many institutions were forced to respond with suspension in all elective surgical procedures, including primary and revision Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA). In 2021, the Centers of Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) removed primary and revision TSA from the Inpatient-Only-List (IPO). These rapid changes created uncertainty surrounding the potential backlog of patients that healthcare systems could face. The purpose of this study is to observe the change in volume as well as proportion of TSA performed in the outpatient setting. METHODS Patients who underwent primary and revision elective TSA from January 2018 to April 2021 were identified using the Pearldiver database. Descriptive analysis was utilized to report the monthly changes in elective TSA volume and the proportion of the volume performed in the outpatient setting. A linear forecast analysis using historical data was utilized to determine the expected volume and proportion of TSA cases performed on an outpatient basis during the pandemic period. This was compared to the observed case volume and setting. RESULTS Within 3 months following suspension, the total volume had returned to expected for both primary and revision TSA. Those performed in the outpatient setting significantly increased throughout the pandemic, with the largest peak following January 2020. By April 2021, four months after the CMS removal of TSA from the IPO list, the backlog of primary TSA volume had decreased by 30.8% with respect that in December 2020. For revision TSA, the backlog was entirely overcome by April 2021 as there was an observed decrease of 131% with respect that in December 2020. CONCLUSION The backlog for both primary and revision TSA from the beginning of the pandemic has decreased. The observed decrease did not seem to start until January 2021 following CMS’ removal of TSA from the IPO list. Therefore, the reduction in the backlog may be associated with the increased utilization of outpatient primary and revision TSA.

Trends and outcomes of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty after its removal from CMS's inpatient-only list

In January 2021, the US Medicare program approved reimbursement of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA), including anatomic and reverse TSAs. It remains unclear whether shifting TSAs from the inpatient to outpatient setting has affected clinical outcomes. Herein, we describe the rate of outpatient TSA growth and compare inpatient and outpatient TSA complications, readmissions, and mortality. Medicare fee-for-service claims for 2019-2022Q1 were analyzed to identify the trends in outpatient TSAs and to compare 90-day postoperative complications, all-cause hospital readmissions, and mortality between outpatients and inpatients. Outpatient cases were defined as those discharged on the same day of the surgery. To reduce the COVID-19 pandemic's impact and selection bias, we excluded 2020Q2-Q4 data and used propensity scores to match 2021-2022Q1 outpatients with inpatients from the same period (the primary analysis) and from 2019-2020Q1 (the secondary analysis), respectively. We performed both propensity score-matched and -weighted multivariate analyses to compare outcomes between the two groups. Covariates included sociodemographics, preoperative diagnosis, comorbid conditions, the Hierarchical Condition Category risk score, prior year hospital/skilled nursing home admissions, annual surgeon volume, and hospital characteristics. Nationally, the proportion of outpatient TSAs increased from 3% (619) in 2019Q1 to 22% (3456) in 2021Q1 and 38% (6778) in 2022Q1. A total of 55,166 cases were identified for the primary analysis (14,540 outpatients and 40,576 inpatients). Overall, glenohumeral osteoarthritis was the most common indication for surgery (70.8%), followed by rotator cuff pathology (14.6%). The unadjusted rates of complications (1.3 vs 2.4%, P<.001), readmissions (3.7 vs 6.1%, P<.001), and mortality (0.2 vs 0.4%, P=.024) were significantly lower among outpatient TSAs than inpatient TSAs. Using 1:1 nearest matching, 12,703 patient pairs were identified. Propensity score-matched multivariate analyses showed similar rates of postoperative complications, hospital readmissions, and mortality between outpatients and inpatients. Propensity score-weighted multivariate analyses resulted in similar conclusions. The secondary analysis showed a lower hospital readmission rate in outpatients (odds ratio: 0.8, P<.001). There has been accelerated growth in outpatient TSAs since 2019. Outpatient and inpatient TSAs have similar rates of postoperative complication, hospital readmission, and mortality.

Association of Total Knee Replacement Removal From the Inpatient-Only List With Outpatient Surgery Utilization and Outcomes in Medicare Patients

Little is known about the association of total knee replacement (TKR) removal from the Medicare inpatient-only (IPO) list in 2018 with outcomes in Medicare patients. To evaluate (1) patient factors associated with outpatient TKR use and (2) whether the IPO policy was associated with changes in postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing TKR. This cohort study included data from administrative claims from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. Included patients were Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries undergoing TKRs or total hip replacements (THRs) in New York State from 2016 to 2019. Multivariable generalized linear mixed models were used to identify patient factors associated with outpatient TKR use, and with a difference-in-differences strategy to examine association of the IPO policy with post-TKR outcomes relative to post-THR outcomes in Medicare patients. Data analysis was performed from 2021 to 2022. IPO policy implementation in 2018. Use of outpatient or inpatient TKR; secondary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day readmissions, 30-day and 90-day postoperative emergency department visits, non-home discharge, and total cost of the surgical encounter. A total of 37 588 TKR procedures were performed on 18 819 patients from 2016 to 2019, with 1684 outpatient TKR procedures from 2018 to 2019 (mean [SD] age, 73.8 [5.9] years; 12 240 female [65.0%]; 823 Hispanic [4.4%], 982 non-Hispanic Black [5.2%], 15 714 non-Hispanic White [83.5%]). Older (eg, age 75 years vs 65 years: adjusted difference, -1.65%; 95% CI, -2.31% to -0.99%), Black (-1.44%; 95% CI, -2.81% to -0.07%), and female patients (-0.91%; 95% CI, -1.52% to -0.29%), as well as patients treated in safety-net hospitals (disproportionate share hospital payments quartile 4: -18.09%; 95% CI, -31.81% to -4.36%), were less likely to undergo outpatient TKR. After IPO policy implementation in the TKR cohort, there were lower adjusted 30-day readmissions (adjusted difference [AD], -2.11%; 95% CI, -2.73% to -1.48%; P < .001), 90-day readmissions ( -3.23%; 95% CI, -4.04% to -2.42%; P < .001), 30-day ED visits ( -2.45%; 95% CI, -3.17% to -1.72%; P < .001), 90-day ED visits (-4.01%; 95% CI, -4.91% to -3.11%; P < .001) and higher cost per encounter ($2988; 95% CI, $415 to $5561; P = .03). However, these changes did not differ from changes in the THR cohort except for increased TKR cost of $770 per encounter ($770; 95% CI, $83 to $1457; P = .03) relative to THR. In this cohort study of patients undergoing TKR and THR, we found that older, Black, and female patients and patients treated in safety-net hospitals may have had lesser access to outpatient TKRs highlighting concerns of disparities. IPO policy was not associated with changes in overall health care use or outcomes after TKR, except for an increase of $770 per TKR encounter.

Did the centers for medicare &amp; medicaid services’ 2018 policy change removing total knee arthroplasty from the inpatient-only list affect overall patient outcomes in the medicare population?

Background: The 2018 Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services (CMS) removal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Inpatient-Only (IPO) list was accompanied by confusion, lack of central guidance on patient selection criteria, payor misinterpretation of the updated policy, and altered payor incentives. The purpose of this study was to assess how the CMS policy change affected overall patient outcomes in the Medicare population after TKA. Methods: Using the ACS-NSQIP database, patients 65 years and older who underwent primary, elective, unilateral TKA without any significant medical comorbidity were included. Complication rates before (2014-2017) and after (2018-2019) CMS removal of TKA from the IPO list were compared using interrupted time series analysis to gauge the impact of the policy shift. Results: A total 185,294 TKA cases were included in the analysis. Following the CMS removal of TKA from the IPO list in 2018, there were significant decreases in rates of any adverse event (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98, P=0.02), any minor adverse event (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97, P=0.02), and thromboembolic events (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.89, P&lt;0.001) significantly decreased There were no significant changes in rates of readmission (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87-1.05, P=0.31), reoperation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.78-1.09, P=0.33), or any major adverse event (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83-1.01, P=0.07). Conclusions: Though the CMS removal of TKA from the IPO list in 2018 was accompanied by the emergence of key new issues, the policy change did not adversely affect 30-day postoperative outcomes in the Medicare TKA patient population. Level of Evidence: Level IV—retrospective cohort study.

Health care policy that relies on poor measurement is ineffective: Lessons from the hospital readmissions reduction program.

Health care policy that relies on poor measurement is ineffective: Lessons from the hospital readmissions reduction program.

The Removal of Total Hip Arthroplasty From the Inpatient-Only List has Improved Patient Selection and Expanded Optimization Efforts

BackgroundOn January 1, 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services removed total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the Inpatient-Only (IPO) list. This study evaluated patient demographics and comorbidities, preoperative optimization efforts, and 30-day outcomes of patients undergoing outpatient THA before and after IPO removal. The authors hypothesized that patients undergoing THA post-IPO removal would have improved optimization of modifiable risk factors and equivalent 30-day outcomes. MethodsThere were 17,063 outpatient THAs in a national database stratified by surgery performed before (2015 to 2019: 5,239 patients) and after IPO (2020: 11,824 patients) removal. Demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day outcomes were compared with univariable and multivariable analyses. Preoperative optimization thresholds were established for the following modifiable risk factors: albumin, creatinine, hematocrit, smoking history, and body mass index. The percentage of patients who fell outside the thresholds in each cohort were compared. ResultsPatients undergoing outpatient THA post-IPO removal were significantly older; mean age 65 years (range, 18 to 92) versus 62 (range, 18 to 90) years (P < .01), with a higher percentage of American Society of Anesthesiologists scores 3 and 4 (P < .01). There was no difference in 30-day readmissions (P = .57) or reoperations (P = 1.00). A significantly lower percentage of patients fell outside the established threshold for albumin (P < .01) post-IPO removal, and trended towards lower percentages for hematocrit and smoking status. ConclusionThe removal of THA from the IPO list expanded patient selection for outpatient arthroplasty. Preoperative optimization is critical to minimize postoperative complications, and the current study demonstrates that 30-day outcomes have not worsened post-IPO removal.

Can a community hospital successfully transition to outpatient total knee arthroplasty in unselected patients?

BackgroundThe removal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Inpatient-Only list in 2018 created pressure on community hospitals to develop rapid discharge protocols (RAP) to increase outpatient discharge. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to compare the efficacy, safety and barriers in achieving outpatient discharge between the standard discharge protocol and newly developed RAP in unselected, unilateral TKA patients. MethodsThis retrospective chart review included 288 standard protocol patients and the first 289 RAP patients following unilateral TKA in a community hospital. The RAP focused on patient discharge expectations and post-operative patient management, with no change in post-operative nausea or pain management. Non-parametric tests were performed to compare demographics, perioperative variables and 90-readmission/complication rates between standard and RAP groups, as well as between inpatient and outpatient discharged RAP patients. Multivariate, stepwise logistic regression was performed to evaluate patient demographics and discharge status, presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsDemographics were similar between groups, however, outpatient discharge significantly increased from 22.2% to 85.8% for standard discharge and RAP, respectively (p < 0.001), with no significant difference in post-operative complications. For RAP patients, age (OR:1.062, CI:1.014–1.111; p = 0.011) and female gender (OR:2.224, CI:1.042–4.832; p = 0.039) increased the risk of inpatient and 85.1% of RAP outpatients were discharged home. ConclusionsWhile RAP was successful, 15% of patients required inpatient care and 15% of patients achieving outpatient discharged were not discharged to their home environment, emphasizing the difficulties of achieving true outpatient status in 100% of patients from a community hospital.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Short-Stay Total Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to understand racial and ethnic disparities in hospital-based, Medicare-defined outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We aimed to determine the following: 1) whether there are differences in preoperative characteristics or postoperative outcomes in outpatient TKA between racial/ethnic groups and 2) trends in outpatient TKA volume, based on race/ethnicity. MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of a large national database. Outpatient TKAs performed between 2012 and 2018 were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared between White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic patients. ResultsOf 54,183 outpatient patients, 85.6% were White, 7.4% Black, 2.6% Asian, and 4.1% Hispanic. Black patients had the highest body mass index, and there were higher rates of diabetes among all minority groups (P < .001). All minority groups were more likely to be discharged to a rehabilitation or a skilled care facility compared to White patients (P < .001). Annual percentage increases in outpatient TKA were most pronounced for Asians and Hispanics and least pronounced among Blacks, when compared to White patients. ConclusionThe outcomes of outpatient TKA are impacted by risk factors that reflect underlying disparities in healthcare. As joint arthroplasties have come off the inpatient-only list and procedures move to ambulatory settings, these disparities will likely magnify and impact outcomes, costs, and access points. Extensive preoperative optimization and interventions that target medical and social factors may help to reduce these disparities in TKA and increase access among minority patients. Level of EvidenceIII, retrospective cohort study.

Over Half of All Medicare Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Are Now Classified as an Outpatient–Three-Year Impact of the Removal From the Inpatient-Only List

BackgroundIn 2018, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services removed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from its inpatient-only list, triggering many unintended consequences. The purpose of this study was to determine how the impact of TKA removal affected the number of outpatient TKA patients, which patients were being labeled outpatient, and how outpatient classification affected discharge location and readmission rates. MethodsUsing a large administrative claims database, we reviewed a consecutive series of 216,365 primary TKA Medicare patients from 2015 to 2020. Patients who had an inpatient status (n = 63,356) were compared to patients who had an outpatient status (n = 38,510) from 2018 to 2020 based on demographics, comorbidities, discharge dispositions, and readmissions. ResultsIn 2015, only 1.8% of TKA patients were designated as outpatients, but by 2020, 57.2% of Medicare TKA patients were classified as outpatients. A majority of patients (72%) who had an outpatient designation remained in the hospital for >24 hours (average length of stay was 2.7 days). Patients who had an outpatient status were discharged to skilled nursing facilities more frequently than patients who had an inpatient status (3.1 versus 2.0%, P < .001) with increased emergency visits (5.1 versus 3.9%, P < .001) and 90-day readmissions (2.2 versus 0.9%, P < .001). ConclusionOver half of all Medicare TKA patients are being classified as outpatients 3 years following the policy to remove TKA from the inpatient-only list. Patients designated as outpatients had higher readmissions than those designated as inpatients. This policy should be re-evaluated in the context of failure to demonstrate safer discharge of Medicare patients who undergo TKA.

Hospital Revenue, Cost, and Contribution Margin in Inpatient Versus Outpatient Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

BackgroundRemoval of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the inpatient-only list has financial implications for both patients and institutions. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare financial parameters between patients designated for inpatient versus outpatient total joint arthroplasty. MethodsWe reviewed all patients who underwent TKA or THA after these procedures were removed from the inpatient-only list. Patients were statistical significance into cohorts based on inpatient or outpatient status, procedure type, and insurance type. This included 5,284 patients, of which 4,279 were designated inpatient while 1,005 were designated outpatient. Patient demographic, perioperative, and financial data including per patient revenues, total and direct costs, and contribution margins (CMs) were collected. Data were compared using t-tests and Chi-squared tests. ResultsAmong Medicare patients receiving THA, CM was 96.1% lower for the inpatient cohort when compared to outpatient (P < .001), although the difference between groups for TKA was not significant (P = .163). For patients covered by Medicaid or Government-managed plans, CM was 807% higher for THA inpatients (P < .001), and 143.7% higher for TKA inpatients (P < .001). ConclusionOur analyses showed that recent costs associated with inpatient stay inconsistently match or outpace additional revenue, causing CM to vary drastically depending on insurance and procedure type. For Medicare patients receiving THA, inpatient surgery is financially disincentivized leaving this vulnerable patient population at a risk of losing access to care. Level III EvidenceRetrospective Cohort Study.

What’s New in Hip Replacement

What’s New in Hip Replacement

The combined effect of policy changes and the covid-19 pandemic on the same day discharge and complications following total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide analysis

IntroductionAs a result of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020, elective surgeries, including total joint arthroplasty (TJA), were suspended nationwide. Concurrent removal of total hip arthroplasty (THA) from the Medicare inpatient-only list posed challenges to the delivery of quality patient care with low payor cost. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare temporal trends in patient demographics, case volumes, length of stay, and complications following elective THA in the years 2019 to 2020 in the United States.MethodsThe 2019 to 2020 ACS-NSQIP database was queried for elective THA patients. Patients Pre-COVID (2019 and 2020Q1) were compared with post-COVID (2020Q2-Q4). THA utilization, demographics, 30-day complications, and length of stay (LOS) were compared between years. Linear regression evaluated changes in case volumes over time with significance threshold of P < 0.05.ResultsA total of 77,797 patients underwent elective THA in 2019 (n = 43,667) and 2020 (n = 34,130), resulting in a 24.5% decline. Outpatient THA increased in 2020 (35.6%) vs. 2019 (5.7%) (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the volume of cases in 2019Q1 through 2019Q4 (P = 0.984). Elective THA volumes declined by 68.8% in 2020Q2, returned to pre-pandemic baseline in 2020Q3, before leveling off at 81.5% of baseline in Q4. Average LOS was significantly shorter in 2020 (1.55 days) vs. 2019 (1.78 days) (P < 0.001) and the proportion of same day discharge (SDD) increased quarterly from 2019 to 2020. There was no significant difference in the total complication rates in 2019 (6.6%) vs. 2020 (6.6%) (P = 0.831).DiscussionElective THA precipitously declined during the second quarter of 2020. The combined effect of policy changes and the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a seven-fold increase in the number of surgeries performed in the outpatient setting in 2020. Rates of SDD doubled over the study period, despite no change in complication rates.