Injuries In Military Personnel Research Articles

Common Data Elements and Databases Essential for the Study of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Military Personnel.

Injuries are the leading cause of medical encounters with over 2 million medical encounters for musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions and over 700,000 acute injuries per year. Musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) are by far the leading health and readiness problem of the U.S. Military. The Proceedings of the International Collaborative Effort on Injury Statistics published a list of 12 data elements deemed necessary for injury prevention in the civilian population; however, there are no standardized list of common data elements (CDEs) across the DoD specifically designed to study MSKIs in the Military Health System (MHS). This study aims to address this gap in knowledge by defining CDEs across the DoD for MSKIs, establishing a CDE dictionary, and compiling other necessary information to quantify MSKI disease burden in the MHS. Between November 2022 and March 2023, we conducted an environmental scan of current MSKI data metrics across the DoD. We used snowball sampling with active engagement of groups housing datasets that contained MSKI data elements to determine CDEs as well as information on readiness databases across the DoD containing up-to-date personnel information on disease, hospitalizations, limited duty days (LDDs), and deployability status for all military personnel, as well as MSKI-specific measures from the MHS Dashboard which tracks key performance measures. We identified 8 unique databases: 5 containing demographic and diagnostic information (Defense Medical Surveillance System, Medical Assessment and Readiness Systems, Military Health System Data Repository, Person-Data Environment, and Soldier Performance, Health, and Readiness Database); and 3 containing LDD information (Aeromedical Services Information Management System, eProfile, and Limited Duty Sailor Marines Readiness Tracker). Nine CDEs were identified: DoD number, sex, race, ethnicity, branch of service, rank, diagnosis, Common Procedural Terminology coding, and cause codes, as they may be captured in any database that is a derivative of the Military Health System Data Repository. Medical Assessment and Readiness Systems contained most variables of interest, excluding injury/place of region and time in service. The Limited Duty Sailor Marines Readiness Tracker contains a variable corresponding to "days on limited duty." The Aeromedical Services Information Management System uses the "release date" and "profile date" to calculate LDDs. The eProfile system determines LDDs by the difference between the "expiration date" and "approved date." In addition, we identified 2 measures on the MHS Dashboard. One measures the percentage of service members (SMs) who are on limited duty for longer than 90 days because of an MSKI and the other tracks the percentage of SMs that are not medically ready for deployment because of a deployment-limiting medical condition. This article identifies core data elements needed to understand and prevent MSKIs and where these data elements can be found. These elements should inform researchers and result in evidence-informed policy decisions supporting SM health to optimize military force readiness.

Prevalence of Upper Extremity Injuries in Military Personnel and the Assessment of Disability Conditions according to Military Regulations

Objective: Musculoskeletal injuries have an essential place among the injuries of military personnel. Depending on the severity of these injuries and the degree of functional loss, return to work is delayed, and sequela leads to job loss and disability as well. This study has aimed to assess the distributions of current injuries and make recommendations to reduce these injuries and evaluate the conditions causing disability. Material and Method: Upper limb injury distribution and disability status of injured contracted soldiers/NCOs, who applied to a tertiary trauma center between January 2019 and January 2020, were evaluated according to Turkish Armed Forces Health Ability Regulation No. 6405. Results: The number of patients included in the study was 31. Their mean age was 21.45. A significant relationship was found when the relationship between injured areas and disability occurrence was evaluated (p=0.036). In this relationship, it was observed that the possibility of especially hand (excluding finger), forearm, and upper arm injuries to cause disability was high and that although the number of finger injuries was high, their possibility to cause disability was at 60%. There was no significant difference between combat and noncombat occupational accidents in terms of the injured areas (p=0.305). Conclusion: Although injuries in military personnel require long rest periods and finger loss poses a major obstacle to serving, there are loss of rights due to the limited disability conditions and insufficient details of the regulations. It is recommended that military guidelines be made more functional, reviewed by a board that includes a hand surgeon, increased training, and the development of double-stage security systems and protective equipment

Understanding Traumatic Brain Injuries in Military Personnel: Investigating the Dynamic Interplay of the Cerebrospinal Fluid and Brain During Blasts.

Background It is estimated that around 450,000 traumatic brain injury cases have occurred in the 21st century with possible under-reporting. Computational simulations are increasingly used to study the pathophysiology of traumatic brain injuries among US military personnel. This approach allows for investigation without ethical concerns surrounding live subject testing. Methodology The pertinent data on head acceleration is applied to a detailed 3D model of a patient-specific head, which encompasses all significant components of the brain and its surrounding fluid. The use of finite element analysis and smoothed-particle hydrodynamics serves to replicate the interaction between these elements during discharge through simulation of their fluid-structure dynamics. Results The stress levels of the brain are assessed at varying time intervals subsequent to the explosion. The regions where there is an intersection between the skull and brain are observed, along with the predominant orientations in which displacement of the brain occurs resulting in a brain injury. Conclusions It has been determined that the cerebrospinal fluid is inadequate in preventing brain damage caused by multiple abrupt directional shifts of the head. Accordingly, additional research must be undertaken to enhance our comprehension of the injury mechanisms linked with consecutive changes in acceleration impacting the head.

Association of clinically-measured and dynamic ankle dorsiflexion assessed by markerless motion capture during the drop-jump task on landing biomechanics and risk of ankle injury in military personnel undergoing 10 weeks of physical training.

Determine the influence of clinically-measured maximum dorsiflexion, dynamic peak dorsiflexion and percent of clinically-measured maximum dorsiflexion used during a drop-jump task on landing biomechanics and risk of ankle injury in military personnel. Prospective cohort study. 672 participants (122 women) enrolled. The weightbearing lunge test assessed clinically-measured maximum dorsiflexion averaged across limbs (degrees). Markerless motion capture and force plates collected lower extremity kinematic and kinetic data during a drop-jump task. Percent of clinically-measured maximum dorsiflexion used during landing was calculated as dynamic peak dorsiflexion divided by clinically-measured value, multiplied by 100 (%). De-identified injury data was derived from military physical therapists. Simple linear regression analysis determined the association between dorsiflexion measures and landing biomechanics. Simple binary logistic regression analyses identified predictors of ankle injuries. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. Eighteen participants sustained a traumatic ankle injury from a landing. All measures of dorsiflexion were associated with movement patterns that countered the stiff-legged landing strategy with dynamic measures showing a higher predictive value. Protective factors against ankle injury included height (odds ratio: 0.818, p = 0.006) and weight (odds ratio: 0.824, p = 0.023) for women. Relative braking impulse was a risk factor for men (odds ratio: 1.890, p = 0.001). Greater clinically-measured and dynamic measures of dorsiflexion were associated with movement patterns that countered the stiff-legged landing strategy but neither measure of dorsiflexion predicted ankle injury risk. Resultant biomechanics and anthropometrics influenced ankle injury risk to warrant recognition for injury prevention initiatives.

Gait Retraining And Telehealth For Mitigation Of Risk Factors For Running-related Injury In Military Personnel

Gait Retraining And Telehealth For Mitigation Of Risk Factors For Running-related Injury In Military Personnel

Current risks factors and emerging biomarkers for bone stress injuries in military personnel.

Bone stress injuries (BSIs) have plagued the military for over 150 years; they afflict around 5 to 10% of military recruits, more so in women, and continue to place a medical and financial burden on defence. While the tibia generally adapts to the rigours of basic military training, the putative mechanisms for bone maladaptation are still unclear. This paper provides a review of the published literature on current risk factors and emerging biomarkers for BSIs in military personnel; the potential for biochemical markers of bone metabolism to monitor the response to military training; and, the association of novel biochemical 'exerkines' with bone health. The primary risk factor for BSI in military (and athletic) populations is too much training, too soon. Appropriate physical preparation before training will likely be most protective, but routine biomarkers will not yet identify those at risk. Nutritional interventions will support a bone anabolic response to training, but exposure to stress, sleep loss, and medication is likely harmful to bone. Monitoring physiology using wearables-ovulation, sleep and stress-offer potential to inform prevention strategies. The risk factors for BSIs are well described, but their aetiology is very complex particularly in the multi-stressor military environment. Our understanding of the skeletal responses to military training is improving as technology advances, and potential biomarkers are constantly emerging, but sophisticated and integrated approaches to prevention of BSI are warranted.

Penetrating gunshot wounds to the penis: a case report of combat patient injured in the war in Ukraine

BackgroundThe current war in Ukraine is associated with frequent applications of multiple-launch rocket systems and cruise missiles as well as other various high-energy weapons to cause severe injuries in military personnel including abdomen wounds, vascular injury, and limb amputations as well as genitourinary trauma. The aim of this report is to demonstrate a case of successful penile salvage by restoring its function in a combat patient with gunshot genitourinary trauma in conditions of an interrupted supply of medical equipment.Case presentationWe describe a case of a 48-year-old male patient with a combined shrapnel gunshot wound to the penis with damage to the urethra and combined injury to the soft tissues of the left thigh. Several hours after the injury, the patient underwent primary surgical debridement of the left thigh, ligation of the great saphenous vein of the thigh, primary sutures on the penile urethra and navicular fossa, suturing of the rupture of the head and penis, drainage of the wound, catheterization of the bladder, and epicystostomy. An artificial erection was performed intraoperatively.The urethral catheter was removed 3 weeks after urethral suturing (May 4, 2022). The epicystostomy was removed 5 months after the injury (August 4, 2022) and 2 days after the restoration of spontaneous urination. At the follow-up of 7 months after the injury, the patient has normal urination with minor urinary dribbling, sufficient erection, and ejaculation.ConclusionsWe have shown that in a case of gunshot wounds to the penis and hanging part of the urethra, even in the presence of combined severe purulent lesions of non-urological localizations, it is possible to perform a primary reconstruction of urogenital injuries using a primary urethral suture and applying a negative pressure device. Findings from this case report shed new light on the management of penile gunshot injury in ongoing warfare as well as provide evidence of the possibility to perform adequate management for penile injury in conditions of limited medical resources, violation of international humanitarian law, and under frequent strikes of high-energy weapons.

A Review of Medical Evacuations Related to Dental Emergencies and Oral-Maxillofacial Injuries.

A literature review was performed to determine the frequency of medical evacuations (MEDEVAC) that are required for dental emergencies (DE) and oral-maxillofacial (OMF) injuries. Fourteen studies were reviewed altogether - eight which quantified evacuation of DEs or OMF injuries in military personnel (from 1982-2013) and six studies that discussed medical evacuation of DEs occurring in civilians working in offshore oil and gas rigs and wilderness expeditions (from 1976-2015). Among military personnel, DE/OMF issues were frequently among one of the top categories of medical evacuations, ranging from 2-16% of all evacuations. Among oil and gas industry workers, 5.3-14.6% of evacuations were dental-related, while one study of wilderness expeditions found that DEs ranked as the third most frequent type of injury that required evacuation. Previous studies have shown that dental and OMF problems often account for one of most frequently cited reasons for evacuation. However, due to the limited study base of DE/OMF medical evacuations, further research is needed to determine their impact on the cost of health care delivery.

Capacitating militarised masculinity: Genitourinary injuries, sex/sexuality, and US military medicine

Abstract This article examines the soldiering body in relation to the increasing prevalence of genitourinary injuries in military personnel. Feminist scholars have demonstrated that the idealised masculine soldiering body are central to the workings of international politics. The article shows that US militarised masculinity operates through the selective distribution of bodily capacities. The article draws upon critical disability studies, particularly Jasbir Puar's work on capacity and debility, to argue that treatments for genitourinary injuries revolve around the production of seminal capacity. Queer and trans bodies are debilitated in these arrangements through the denial of heterosexual and cisgender capabilities to them. To unpack this argument the article analyses treatments for genitourinary injuries. The article shows that genitourinary injuries destabilise the gender identity of US service members. Through an exploration of surgical treatments, including penis transplants and reconstructive surgeries, and fertility treatments, the article shows how masculine capacitation is achieved for some US service members through the debilitation of others; in particular, queer and trans bodies, and the bodies of Iraqi and Afghan civilians.

A Retrospective Cohort Study of Burn Casualties Transported by the US Army Burn Flight Team and US Air Force Critical Care Air Transport Teams.

The US Army Burn Center, the only burn center in the Department of Defense provides comprehensive burn care. The Burn Flight Team (BFT) provides specialized burn care during transcontinental evacuation. During Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom, burn injuries accounted for approximately 5% of all injuries in military personnel. To augment BFT capacity, US Air Force Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATTs) mobilized to transport burn patients. The purpose of this study was to describe critically ill, burn injured patients transported to the US Army Burn Center by BFT or CCATT, to compare and contrast characteristics, evacuation procedures, in-flight treatments, patient injuries/illnesses, and outcomes between the two groups. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of CCATT and BFT patients, admitted to the burn ICU between January 1, 2001 and September 30, 2018. Patients with total body surface area burned (TBSA) >30% were evacuated by BFT, while CCATT evacuated patients with ≤ 30% TBSA. Ninety-seven patients met inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 40 (41%) were transported by the BFT and 57 (59%) were transported by CCATTs. Compared with patients transported by CCATTs, patients transferred by the BFT had higher median TBSA and full-thickness burn size, higher prevalence of chest, back and groin burns, and higher prevalence of inhalation injury. BFT patients had increased hospital days (62 vs. 37; P = .08), ICU days (29 vs. 12; P = .003) and ventilator days (14 vs. 6; P < .001). TBSA was the only variable significantly associated with ARDS (aOR = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.08; P = 0.04), renal failure (aOR = 1.07; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.11; P = .002), and mortality (aOR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.13; P = .001). Evacuation by the BFT was associated with increased ICU and ventilator days, increased mortality, and a greater risk for developing renal failure. The severity of injury/TBSA likely accounted for most of these differences.

Long-Term Effects of Repeated Blast Exposure in United States Special Operations Forces Personnel: A Pilot Study Protocol.

Emerging evidence suggests that repeated blast exposure (RBE) is associated with brain injury in military personnel. United States (U.S.) Special Operations Forces (SOF) personnel experience high rates of blast exposure during training and combat, but the effects of low-level RBE on brain structure and function in SOF have not been comprehensively characterized. Further, the pathophysiological link between RBE-related brain injuries and cognitive, behavioral, and physical symptoms has not been fully elucidated. We present a protocol for an observational pilot study, Long-Term Effects of Repeated Blast Exposure in U.S. SOF Personnel (ReBlast). In this exploratory study, 30 active-duty SOF personnel with RBE will participate in a comprehensive evaluation of: 1) brain network structure and function using Connectome magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 7 Tesla MRI; 2) neuroinflammation and tau deposition using positron emission tomography; 3) blood proteomics and metabolomics; 4) behavioral and physical symptoms using self-report measures; and 5) cognition using a battery of conventional and digitized assessments designed to detect subtle deficits in otherwise high-performing individuals. We will identify clinical, neuroimaging, and blood-based phenotypes that are associated with level of RBE, as measured by the Generalized Blast Exposure Value. Candidate biomarkers of RBE-related brain injury will inform the design of a subsequent study that will test a diagnostic assessment battery for detecting RBE-related brain injury. Ultimately, we anticipate that the ReBlast study will facilitate the development of interventions to optimize the brain health, quality of life, and battle readiness of U.S. SOF personnel.

Effects of prevention programmes on injury risk in military personnel: a systematic review with meta-analysis

IntroductionExercise programmes have been used to prevent injuries in military personnel, as they can reduce modifiable risk factors for injuries. Our aim was to review the literature to evaluate the...

Clinical and epidemiological characteristics severe injuries in military personnel in peacetime

The purpose of the study: to study the clinical and epidemiological aspects of severe trauma (polytrauma), accompanied by shock and (or) coma, in military personnel in peacetime.Material and methods. During the period 2015–2021, 280 cases of severe trauma were studied in servicemen who were initially hospitalized in medical or military medical organizations of the zone of territorial medical responsibility of the Western Military District of the Russian Defense Ministry. Polytrauma (ISS≥18 points, “Berlin Definition”) was recorded in 137 cases (48.9%). 252 victims (90.0%) were subsequently evacuated to higher-level trauma centers for medical, tactical and organizational reasons. Statistical processing of information and analytical work were carried out with the help of the original trauma register.Results and discussion. In the structure of the causes of severe trauma (traumogenesis) military personnel in peacetime, as well as in the whole of the Russian Federation, were dominated by traffic accidents. The injury structure д. was dominated by injury without severe leading damage (max AIS=2 points). The most severe and unfavorable in prognostic terms were injuries of two or more anatomical areas; injuries with leading damage to soft tissues and breast organs. In general, compliance with the principles of primary routing of victims with mechanical injuries was noted, the proportion of victims with polytrauma taken to level 3 trauma centers is minimal. More than half of the victims (52.1%) are initially taken to trauma centers after hours, when their medical and diagnostic resources are limited. During the initial delivery to military medical organizations, military personnel are more often delivered to level 3 trauma centers. Victims with an ISS index of less than 18 points were taken to trauma centers of all levels in approximately equal proportions. The proportion of polytrauma victims taken to level 3 trauma centers was minimal. Inter-hospital transportation of victims from level 3 trauma centers was carried out on average 27 hours earlier than from level 2 trauma centers.Conclusions. Timely inter-hospital transportation of victims with polytrauma increased their chances of a favorable outcome. When studying the problem of severe trauma, the trauma register allows you to conduct high-quality analytical work. The problem of timeliness of inter-hospital transportation for medical and tactical indications is still relevant, especially in the central area of medical responsibility of the Western Military District.

Acute Fatigue Responses to Occupational Training in Military Personnel: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Military personnel are required to undertake rigorous physical training to meet the unique demands of combat, often leading to high levels of physiological stress. Inappropriate recovery periods with these high levels of physical stress may result in sub-optimal training and increased risk of injury in military personnel. However, no reviews have attempted to examine the magnitude of training-induced stress following military training activities. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the magnitude of physiological stress (physical, hormonal, and immunological) following task-specific training activities in military personnel. An extensive literature search was conducted within CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, SportDiscus, and Web of Science databases with 7,220 records extracted and a total of 14 studies eligible for inclusion and evaluation. Study appraisal was conducted using the Kmet scale. Meta-analysis was conducted via forest plots, with standard mean difference (SMD, effect size) and inter-trial heterogeneity (I2) calculated between before (preactivity) and after (12-96 hours postactivity) military-specific activities for biomarkers of physiological stress (muscle damage, inflammation, and hormonal) and physical performance (muscular strength and power). Military training activities resulted in significant levels of muscle damage (SMD = -1.28; P = .003) and significant impairments in strength and power (SMD = 0.91; P = .008) and testosterone levels (SMD = 1.48; P = .05) up to 96 hours postactivity. There were no significant differences in inflammation (SMD = -0.70; P = .11), cortisol (SMD = -0.18; P = .81), or insulin-like growth factor 1 (SMD = 0.65; P = .07) when compared to preactivity measures. These findings indicate that assessments of muscle damage, anabolic hormones like testosterone, strength, and power are effective for determining the level of acute stress following military-specific activities. With regular monitoring of these measures, appropriate recovery periods may be implemented to optimize training adaptations and occupational performance, with minimal adverse training responses in military personnel.

Digital phenotyping in transmission constrained, military operational environments

Introduction: Stress fracture injuries affect defence forces worldwide. The sudden onset of high-impact exercise, insufficient recovery, and suboptimal conditions (e.g., energy and sleep restriction) elicit injuries in 5 to 10% of military recruits. Women are three times more likely to develop stress fractures than men1, and this risk of injury is projected to increase further in women employed in ground close combat roles2. Oestrogens have two distinct roles in women’s bone biology. 1. Oestrogens influence the size and shape of bone during puberty, promoting endosteal contraction, and resulting in a smaller cross-sectional area than men. A smaller bone size contributes to the increased risk of stress injuries under loading in women. 2. Oestrogens prevent excessive bone resorption by suppressing RANKL expression. Low oestrogen caused by suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis—indicated by a loss of menstrual periods—is highly prevalent during arduous exercise3 and demineralises bone. Cessation of menstrual periods, amenorrhoea, is a risk factor for stress fracture injury4. Ovulation is a key event in the menstrual cycle, preceded by a peak in oestrogen concentration, and followed by increased progesterone concentration. Anovulatory cycles are characterised by low, non-cyclical oestrogen and progesterone. Ovulation is a sign of menstrual health and informs women of their reproductive hormonal status. Non-invasive, innovative methods of detecting ovulation are disrupted approaches to mitigating injury risk in women. Methods: This presentation will provide an overview of the epidemiology of stress fracture injuries in military personnel, reporting the prevalence and patterns of injuries observed during basic military training. The role of the sex steroid hormones on bone health will be described, and the utility of wearables to detect ovulation appraised. Primary evidence will be obtained from open-source, peer-reviewed literature, and wearable data will be drawn from both published studies and preliminary data from the British Army’s EMPOWER study. Conclusions: A high proportion of women experience menstrual disturbances during arduous training and suffer a high incidence of stress fractures. The validity of wearable technology for women to detect ovulation during arduous military training, characterised by high physical demands, stress, and restricted energy and sleep, is under investigation. Acknowledgements: This work was funded by the British Army. References 1O’Leary TJ, Wardle SL, Rawcliff AJ, et al. Understanding the musculoskeletal injury risk of women in combat: the effect of infantry training and sex on musculoskeletal injury incidence during British Army basic training. BMJ Mil Health. 2020; 0:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-2019-001347 2Ministry of Defence. Women in Ground Close Combat Roles - Interim Health Report 2016. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/536381/20160706_ADR006101_Report_Women_in_Combat_WEB-FINAL.PDF Accessed 31 Aug 2021. 3Gifford RM, O’Leary TJ, Wardle SL, et al. Reproductive and metabolic adaptation to multistressor training in women. Am J Physiol Endoc-M 2021; 321(2):E281-E291. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00019.2021 4Ackerman KE, Sokoloff NC, Maffazioli GDN, et al. Fractures in relation to menstrual status and bone parameters in young athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2015; 47(8):1577-1586. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000574

Military Working Dogs Operating in Afghanistan Theater: Comparison between Pre- and Post-Mission Blood Analyses to Monitor Physical Fitness and Training

Simple SummaryIn modern conflicts, one of the greatest risks for military personnel is represented by explosive devices. For this reason, specifically trained dogs able to detect explosives have been more and more intensively used in humanitarian military operations. However, at present, literature regarding working problems reported by these animals is very limited. The a of this study was to evaluate the health status of military dogs participating in humanitarian missions to Afghanistan, comparing their pre- and post-mission blood work. Dogs were first considered together as a group and then divided in groups by age, sex, breed and mission length. The results of the study show that there are no particular differences between their blood work before and after the missions. This indicates that the recorded dogs were physically well prepared to face their tasks.The intergovernmental organization known as the United Nations (UN) was born “to maintain international peace and security” through different operations and tasks, including “mine action” and “explosive detection”. Explosives are the most frequent cause of injuries in military personnel and an enormous danger for civilians. The role of explosive detection dogs (EDDs) and mine detection dogs has gained great consideration over time, leading to their intense use in military operations. Literature regarding working injuries reported by EDDs during missions is limited. The aim of the present study is to investigate the hematological changes that occurred between pre- and post-mission blood analyses in military working dogs deployed to Afghanistan in order to evaluate signs of health problems or physical adjustments. Examining the clinical records, only three dogs reported a medical issue, one with gastric dilatation-volvulus (GDV), and two with lameness episodes. Lack of health issues occurring during the missions was reflected by the absence of significant differences between pre- and post-mission blood analyses. Blood results were also examined by dividing the EDDs into groups considering age at departure, sex, breed and mission length. A few categories demonstrated significant changes in some parameters; however, the mean values were always included in the ranges of normality, indicating that their physical fitness and training were adequate for the required tasks.

Sleep and Injuries in Military Personnel With Suggestions for Improving Sleep and Mitigating Effects of Sleep Loss.

Sleep professionals suggest adults should sleep at least seven hours per night and define good sleep quality as 1) sleep onset =15 minutes, 2) one or fewer awakenings per night, 3) awake after sleep onset =20 minutes, and 4) sleep efficiency (ratio of sleep time to time in bed) =85%. This paper focuses on associations between injuries and sleep quality/duration among military personnel and strategies to optimize sleep and mitigate effects of sleep loss. Investigations among military personnel generally used convenience samples who self-reported their injury and sleep quality/quantity. Despite these limitations, data suggest that lower sleep quality or duration is associated with higher risk of musculoskeletal injury (MSI). Possible mechanisms whereby poor sleep quality/duration may influence MSI include hormonal changes increasing muscle catabolism, increases in inflammatory processes affecting post-exercise muscle damage, and effects on new bone formation. Sleep can be optimized by a slightly cool sleeping environment, bedding that maintains a stable thermal microclimate around the body, not using media devices near bedtime or in the sleeping environment, minimizing noise, and having regular bed and awaking times. Sleep loss mitigation strategies include napping (<30 to 90 minutes), sleep banking (extended time in bed), and judicious use of caffeine or modafinil.

Comparison of indicators of injuries in military personnel serving on conscription in the Armed Forces of Russia and the Republic of Belarus (2003–2020)

Relevance. Injury indicators in military personnel reflect injuries and their consequences that occur in a certain period, as a rule, over a year. Injury indicators in the Armed Forces (AF) are important for assessing occupational safety.Intention: To compare injury indicators in military conscripts between the Russian Armed Forces and the Republic of Belarus for 18 years from 2003 to 2020.Methodology. We carried out a selective statistical analysis of medical reports on the health status of personnel and the activities of the medical service according to 3/MED form in military units where at least 80 % of the total number of conscripts of the Armed Forces of Russia and Belarus served. Groups (blocks) of injuries in Chapter XIX “Injuries, poisoning and certain other consequences of exposure to external causes” were agreed with the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision (ICD-10). Injury data were calculated per 1000 military personnel or ‰, mortality rates – per 100 000 military personnel.Results and their Discussion. In the Russian Armed Forces compared to the Belarusian Armed Forces, the average annual injury rates (primary morbidity) of conscripts were (15.91 ± 1.65) ‰ vs (20.23 ± 1.96) ‰, hospitalizations with injuries (14.16 ± 1.29 ) vs (14.50 ± 0.96) ‰, work days lost (303.4 ± 27.0) vs (303.4 ± 27.0) ‰, dismissal due to injuries (0.552 ± 0.066) vs (0.551 ± 0.051) ‰, injury-related mortality (21.96 ± 4.26) vs (24.18 ± 4.29) per 100 000, respectively. As a rule, polynomial trends with high determination coefficients showed a decrease in the levels of injury, hospitalization, work days lost and mortality. Dismissal trends showed decrease in the Russian Armed Forces and increase in the Belarusian Armed Forces. The conscripts of the Armed Forces of Russia and Belarus have a positive statistically significant congruence in indicators of injuries, hospitalizations, work days lost and mortality, which may indicate the influence of the same (unidirectional) factors in the formation of annual indicators. Injuries of the head (Group 1, Chapter XIX by ICD-10), shoulder girdle and upper limbs (Groups 5–7), the area of the hip joint and lower extremities (Groups 8–10), injuries, affecting several areas of the body (Group 11), and the consequences of injuries, poisoning and other external causes (Group 22) are of high military-epidemiological significance for conscripts in the Russian Armed Forces and the Belarusian Armed Forces. These injuries accounted for 78.7 % and 82.8 % of the generalized estimate in the Russian Armed Forces and the Armed Forces of Belarus, respectively.Conclusion. Taking into account the indicators of injuries will allow the medical service to optimize the calculation of forces and assets for treatment and rehabilitation of servicemen with injuries. Injuries are not only a medical problem; it is necessary to involve more extensively military professionals from various services to analyze the cause-and-effect relationships of injuries and develop measures for their prevention.

Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in military personnel: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

To investigate the risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries in military personnel. A systematic literature search was carried out in August 2019 and updated in July 2020 without language or time filters. The inclusion criteria were prospective studies that investigated the risk factors for injuries in military personnel. Only risk factors analyzed by at least ten studies were selected for the meta-analysis. For data analysis, the RevMan5.3 program was used to compare the number of participants with injuries between high- or low-risk groups. The measurement of dichotomous variables was one of the selected parameters for the analysis, as well as the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method, random-effects model, and analysis with a relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval for the included studies. A total of 2,629 studies were identified through databases. Thirty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. The groups considered at risk were the oldest [RR = 1.22; (95% CI 1.06-1.41)], with overweight or obesity [RR = 1.27; (95% CI 1.08-1, 48)], with previous injuries [RR = 1.15; (95% CI 1.01-1.30)], and with the worst performance in running tests of 1,600-3,200m [RR = 1.87; (95% CI 1.28-2.71)]. Gender, ethnicity, and smoking were not associated with injuries. However, a subgroup analysis showed that among studies with a follow-up of fewer than 12months, women presented RR = 2.44 (95% CI 1.65-3.60) more likely to develop injuries. Age, overweight or obesity, previous injuries, and performance in the 1600-3200m run are associated with an increased risk of injury in the military.

Exercise Programs to Reduce the Risk of Musculoskeletal Injuries in Military Personnel: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of exercise programs on reduction of musculoskeletal injury (MSI) risk in military populations.DesignSystematic review and meta‐analysis.Literature SurveyA database search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, SPORTdiscus, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform Search Portal, Open Gray, National Technical Reports Library, and reference lists of included articles up to July 2019. Randomized and cluster‐randomized controlled trials evaluating exercise programs as preventive interventions for MSIs in armed forces compared to other exercise programs or to usual practice were eligible for inclusion.MethodologyTwo authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Data were adjusted for clustering if necessary and pooled using the random‐effects model when appropriate.SynthesisWe included 15 trials in this review, with a total number of 14 370 participants. None of the included trials appeared to be free of any risk of bias. Meta‐analysis and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) assessment could be performed for static stretching compared to no stretching (3532 participants), showing low quality of evidence indicating no favorable effect of stretching. Gait retraining, an anterior knee‐pain targeted program, and resistance exercises showed cautious favorable effects on reducing injury risk in military personnel.ConclusionThe current evidence base for exercise‐based MSI prevention strategies in the military is of low quality. Areas worthy of further exploration include the effects of gait retraining, anterior knee‐pain targeted programs, agility training, and resistance training programs, on medial tibial stress syndrome incidence, anterior knee pain incidence, attrition due to injuries and any type of MSI, respectively.