onabotulinumtoxinA Injections Research Articles

Successful Treatment of Severe, Poorly Controlled Benign Essential Blepharospasm with DaxibotulinumtoxinA.

Benign essential blepharospasm is a focal dystonia characterized by involuntary contractions of the orbicularis oculi. Botulinum toxin type A injections are often first-line treatment, but patients may experience refractory symptoms or decreased response over time. DaxibotulinumtoxinA, a novel botulinum toxin type A product, has shown promise in cervical dystonia and facial rhytids but has not been previously reported for benign essential blepharospasm treatment. This case highlights a 57-year-old male with severe, poorly controlled benign essential blepharospasm despite high-dose injections of onabotulinumtoxinA and incobotulinumtoxinA. He subsequently received 100 units of daxibotulinumtoxinA in the same periorbital injection pattern with subjective faster onset, extended duration of effect, and improved symptom management compared to previous treatments. Notably, the patient experienced 50% to 75% efficacy retention at 3 months postinjection, significantly better than his response to other botulinum toxin type A products. This case suggests that daxibotulinumtoxinA may be an effective treatment for benign essential blepharospasm including patients experiencing poor symptom control with other botulinum toxin type A products.

Outcomes following intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA in a national cohort of nursing home residents

AbstractObjectivesTo determine predictors of treatment success and complications following intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections among a large cohort of nursing home (NH) residents, representing one of the most frail and vulnerable populations in the United States.Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of long‐stay NH residents who underwent onabotulinumtoxinA injections between 2014 and 2016. Residents were identified using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) linked to Medicare claims. Frailty was measured using the Claims‐based Frailty Index and socioeconomic status using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI; higher ADI = increasing social deprivation). The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as repeat onabotulinumtoxinA injection within 1 year of index injection. Secondary outcomes included 30‐day complications and urinary retention, defined as new indwelling urinary catheters identified on the MDS at 3 months.ResultsOnabotulinumtoxinA injections were performed in 1683 NH residents. Mean age was 78.2 years, 74% were female and 22.8% had an indwelling urinary catheter at baseline. A total of 38.4% of residents had ≥1 30‐day complication and 14.6% had a new catheter at 3 months. Repeat injections were performed in 34.3% of residents within 1 year. Repeat injections were more likely among residents who were female [adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.29; 95% CI 1.08–1.54] and who had a baseline catheter (aRR 1.30; 95% CI 1.11–1.52). Residents who were ≥85 years (aRR 0.78; 95% CI 0.64–0.96) and those in the lowest quartile ADI (aRR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61–0.93) were less likely to undergo repeat injections.ConclusionAmong this population of NH residents, who are by definition frail and comorbid, rates of repeat onabotulinumtoxinA injections are comparable to retrospective analyses of younger adults and independent of frailty and comorbidity. Based on these findings, surgeons should consider the entire clinical picture when evaluating patients for onabotulinumtoxinA injections and should not necessarily exclude those who are frail or comorbid from this potentially quality‐of‐life‐improving therapy.

Patient Safety: Acknowledging Acute Angioedema Following Cosmetic Injections

To report a case of acute angioedema following hyaluronic acid filler and onabotulinumtoxinA injection in an individual with allergies, recent viral vaccination, and polymyalgia rheumatica. This is a retrospective case report. A 63-year-old female with a history of allergies, asthma, and polymyalgia rheumatica on lisinopril presented with angioedema 4 hours following facial filler injection and botulinum toxin injection. The patient was successfully treated with epinephrine, diphenhydramine, and methylprednisolone. Although cosmetic injections are commonly performed, clinicians must be vigilant about rare, yet serious side-effects such as angioedema. This case underscores the importance of thoroughly evaluating medical histories before cosmetic injections and addressing patient concerns after the procedure.

Predictive Factors for Clean Intermittent Catheterization after Intravesical OnabotulinumtoxinA Injections in Women with Overactive Bladder: a Danish Retrospective Cohort Study.

We aimed to evaluate the clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) rate in women undergoing their first OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) treatment and to investigate factors predictive of initiating CIC. This was a retrospective cohort of women, who had their first BTX-A treatment for symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome, with a pretreatment urodynamic study (UDS). We reviewed demographic, medical and gynecological history, UDS, pretreatment bladder diaries, objective examinations, BTX-A treatment details, and post-void residual (PVR) reports in the electronic medical record. Botox® Allergan 100 International Units were injected into the detrusor at 10-20 sites. Statistical analyses included univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. We included 397 women. Median age was 68 (Q1-Q3: 54-76) years. CIC rate was 8.6% (n = 34) following the first BTX-A treatment. Urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) reduced the risk of undergoing CIC (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09-0.97). A bladder capacity of 500ml or greater in the bladder diary increased the risk of CIC (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.06-5.70), whereas reported leakages were associated with a decreased risk of CIC (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10-0.57). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that anterior colporrhaphy (OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.52-9.06) and 10-ml increments in median maximum cystometric capacity (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06) predicted CIC, whereas UUI was a protective factor for CIC (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.79). A history of anterior colporrhaphy, large bladder capacity, and absence of incontinence episodes in bladder diary or UDS were risk factors for CIC after the first BTX-A treatment.

Bilateral Greater Occipital Nerve Block for Preventing the OnabotulinumtoxinA Wear-off Phenomenon in the Treatment of Chronic Migraine: A Case Series of 12 Patients

Purpose: OnabotulinumtoxinA is widely used to treat chronic migraines; however, the wear-off phenomenon before the next scheduled dose has emerged as a challenge. This study suggests a new strategy for preventing the wear-off phenomenon using bilateral greater occipital nerve block. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with chronic migraine who were treated with onabotulinumtoxinA and bilateral greater occipital nerve block at St. Vincent Hospital from January 2023 to December 2023. Twelve chronic migraine patients with a history of the wear-off phenomenon received a greater occipital nerve block 8 weeks after the initial onabotulinumtoxinA injection for two sessions. Responses to treatment were evaluated with regular follow-ups and daily headache diaries. Results: All patients who had previously experienced the wear-off phenomenon with conventional onabotulinumtoxinA treatment did not experience the wear-off phenomenon during two sessions with an additional greater occipital nerve block administered 8 weeks after each onabolulinumtoxinA injection. Conclusion: Bilateral greater occipital nerve block administered 8 weeks after the initial onabotulinumtoxinA injection effectively prevents the wear-off phenomenon, enabling sustained therapeutic benefits in chronic migraine patients. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in larger cohorts.

Ultrasound visualization of Botulinum toxin injection: Identifying clinical correlates to optimize outcomes in spasticity management.

Botulinum toxin injections are well established and commonly used for spasticity management. Clinicians strive to optimize outcomes from toxin injections. One potential complication is toxin spread beyond the intended muscle, which can lead to unwanted weakness. The utilization of ultrasound allows direct visualization of target muscles and identification of toxin leakage from the target muscle. Ultrasound evaluation of clinical factors that correlate to toxin leakage have not been studied. To identify cases of botulinum toxin injectate leak beyond the targeted muscle during ultrasound-guided spasticity injections and associate cases of leak with predictive clinical factors, which include muscle size, fibroadipose changes, and number of previous injections. This was a prospective observational study. An outpatient clinic in an academic medical center. Patients who demonstrated wrist flexor spasticity warranting intervention were invited to participate. Patients received standard-of-care spasticity management with injection of onabotulinumtoxinA into the flexor carpi radialis muscle based upon clinical presentation and prescribing guidelines. Ultrasound video was recorded, and a blinded review was conducted by the study team. The primary outcome measure was visualized leak of injectate on recorded ultrasound video. Documented leak was then associated with clinical factors including diameter of the flexor carpi radialis, volume of injectate used, history of prior injections, and fibrotic change of the muscle. The study included 54 patients, 77.8% of whom had an underlying diagnosis of cerebrovascular accident. Injectate leak was observed in 18.5% of injections and could not be confirmed in 9.3% of injections. Multivariable analysis demonstrated increased odds of leak with higher Modified Heckmatt Scale score. No statistically significant increase in leak was noted with higher volume of injectate or smaller muscle diameter. Extramuscular leak of botulinum toxin injection may be associated with fibroadipose muscle change.

Review of simultaneous treatment with intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injections during transurethral prostate surgery for men with bladder outlet obstruction and overactive bladder

ABSTRACT Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) is common in males with benign prostate enlargement (BPE) and often presents with different lower urinary tract symptoms. Overactive bladder (OAB) has been reported to be related to BOO, although it can also be idiopathic. The storage symptoms of BOO are often similar to those of OAB. The etiology and pathophysiology of both BPE and OAB are multifactorial with metabolic syndrome known as one of the factors. As of today, transurethral prostate surgery remains the gold standard for treating BOO associated with BPE. Intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) injections have been shown to be effective in treating OAB. However, they are usually administered after transurethral prostate surgery. In view of the strong therapeutic effects of both surgery and injections, the feasibility of combining them in one setting to increase patient comfort, convenience, and possibly results while decreasing costs is appealing to physicians. However, patient safety and possible complications have to be considered. In this article, we review available studies of concurrent intradetrusor BoNT-A injections during transurethral prostate surgery. Although there is no definitive evidence supporting the concurrent use of intradetrusor BoNT-A during transurethral prostate surgery, there are no reports of increased complications too. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials would be necessary to validate the feasibility of combining the treatments in one setting and observe for possible complications.

Sexual Dysfunction in Patients with Overactive Bladder Syndrome Treated with Botulinum Toxin

Introduction: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a syndrome of the lower urinary tract characterized by urinary urgency, frequency, and nocturia, with or without urgency urinary incontinence. OAB significantly impacts all aspects of life—social, psychological, physical, professional, domestic, and sexual—for both women and men. The aim of this study was to investigate sexual dysfunction in both women and men with OAB treated with intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) injections using the Sexual Quality of Life questionnaire in two versions: female (SQoL-F) and male (SQoL-M). Methods: Forty sexually active patients (thirty women and ten men) with idiopathic OAB were recruited. Patients completed the SQoL-F or SQoL-M questionnaire before treatment, and again at 3 and 6 months after treatment with intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injections. Results: All 40 patients completed the study (30 women and 10 men). There were no statistically significant differences in SQoL results before the procedure or at 3- and 6-months post-treatment. Conclusions: OAB treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA did not significantly affect the quality of sexual life in either women or men. Further research is needed using questionnaires specifically designed to assess the sexual life of patients with OAB, especially in men.

173 - Predictive factors for clean intermittent catheterization after intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injections in women with overactive bladder syndrome: A Danish retrospective cohort study

173 - Predictive factors for clean intermittent catheterization after intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA injections in women with overactive bladder syndrome: A Danish retrospective cohort study

The Effects of OnabotulinumtoxinA on Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Analysis

Background: Psychopathological symptoms can exacerbate or induce cutaneous disorders. The side effect profile of psychiatric medications may reduce compliance in patients with primarily dermatologic complaints. OnabotulinumtoxinA injections are a common dermatologic intervention that recently demonstrated efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms. This systematic review investigates the anxiolytic effects of onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with comorbid anxiety. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, databases including APA PsycInfo, Embase, and PubMed were searched using MeSH terms related to onabotulinumtoxinA and anxiety. English-language primary research that examined the effects of onabotulinumtoxinA on anxiety was selected. Data regarding study design, participant demographics, indications, dosage, and anxiety scores were analyzed. Results: From 677 citations, 32 studies involving 41 patient groups met the criteria for inclusion in this review. The average population was 46 ± 14 years old and female (70 ± 24%). The most common indications for onabotulinumtoxinA included pain (46.3%) and chronic migraines/headaches (34.1%) with a mean dose of (251 ± 368 U). The severity of anxiety was assessed with validated scales in 94% and 81% of patients pre- and post-injection, respectively. At 4 ± 5 months post-onabotulinumtoxinA, 63% of patient groups revealed significant reductions in anxiety. Transient pain and muscle stiffness were the most common side effects, reported in 41.5% of groups. Conclusion: OnabotulinumtoxinA is a promising anxiolytic with a mild side effect profile. Further research will be needed to detail its efficacy relative to specific dermatologic indications, injection locations, and lasting effects.

Adverse Effects of Intravesical OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection in Patients with Idiopathic Overactive Bladder or Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.

Despite the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA, its safety profile remains a concern. This meta-analysis reviewed the major adverse events (AEs) associated with intravesical onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) and idiopathic overactive bladder (iOAB). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted between January 2000 and December 2022 were searched for adult patients administered different onabotulinumtoxinA dosages or onabotulinumtoxinA vs. placebo. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.3. A total of 26 RCTs were included in the analysis, including 8 on NDO and 18 on iOAB. OnabotulinumtoxinA vs. placebo significantly increased the urinary tract infection (UTI) incidence in patients with NDO (relative risk, or RR, 1.54) and iOAB (RR, 2.53). No difference in the RR with different onabotulinumtoxinA dosages was noted. Urinary retention was frequent with onabotulinumtoxinA use in the NDO (RR, 6.56) and iOAB (RR, 7.32) groups. Similar observations were made regarding the risks of de novo clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). The risk of voiding difficulty increased with onabotulinumtoxinA use in patients with iOAB. Systemic AEs of onabotulinumtoxinA, including muscle weakness (RR, 2.79) and nausea (RR, 3.15), were noted in patients with NDO; most systemic AEs had a low incidence and were sporadic.

Open label experience of repeated OnabotulinumtoxinA injections towards the sphenopalatine ganglion in patients with chronic cluster headache and chronic migraine.

A novel technique for injection of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTA) towards the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) has shown promise in refractory chronic migraine (CM) and chronic cluster headache (CCH). Open label safety and efficacy data are presented here. Patients with refractory CM or CCH who had received at least one injection and completed headache diaries were included. Efficacy was defined as ≥50% reduction in moderate-to-severe headache days for CM, or ≥50% reduction in attack frequency for CCH, at weeks five to eight. Over 261 injections, there were 123 adverse events (AE), of which one was serious. Most (93%) AEs were mild and all were transient. The 50% response to one injection was 81% for CM and 69% for CCH. The response gradually reduced over subsequent months for CM but stayed between 55% and 67% for CCH. Repeated injections were beneficial. Injections resulted in improvement for both groups and was maintained with repeated injections. Repeat injection after three months may be beneficial in CM. Adverse events were not uncommon, but universally transient, presumably as a result of the mechanism of action of BTA. Repeated BTA injection towards the SPG could be an effective treatment for refractory CM and CCH. Larger, randomised, placebo-controlled trials are required.

Cost Analysis of Oral Phenazopyridine vs Intravesical Lidocaine for Preprocedural Analgesia for Intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA Injections.

Office administration of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA is commonly used to treat overactive bladder. For preprocedure analgesia, either 50 mL 2% intravesical lidocaine instillation for 20 to 30 minutes or 200 mg oral phenazopyridine can be used. Phenazopyridine is associated with shorter appointment times and is noninferior to lidocaine for pain control in this setting. We performed a cost analysis of phenazopyridine vs lidocaine for analgesia before office intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection for the treatment of idiopathic overactive bladder. A health care sector-perspective cost analysis was performed. The following assumptions were made: (1) similar efficacy of each medication in providing adequate analgesia, (2) similar physician ease of performing the procedure with either analgesic, and (3) similar patient satisfaction with either analgesic. Average cost of medications, adverse reactions, nursing tasks, and office visit time were found in publicly available data. Sensitivity analyses were performed using TreeAge Pro 2021, R1 software. Phenazopyridine is less costly compared to lidocaine per visit for office intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection ($827 vs $925). A difference of $98 per procedure provides a total annual cost savings of over $24 million if all procedures are performed with phenazopyridine instead of lidocaine. Sensitivity analysis showed that phenazopyridine remained less costly under most circumstances, and threshold analysis provided exact circumstances under which phenazopyridine is no longer cost saving. Phenazopyridine provides cost savings compared to lidocaine for analgesia before office intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA injection for the treatment of idiopathic overactive bladder. If adopted by providers nationwide, phenazopyridine may reduce health care spending and minimize office visit time while maintaining patient pain control and satisfaction.

The effectiveness and predictors influencing the outcome of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in chronic migraine: understanding from diverse patient profiles in a single session.

This real-world study aimed to investigate how onabotulinumtoxinA affects the outcome of migraine, along with accompanying anxiety, depression, and bruxism among a group of patients with chronic migraine (CM) and define predictors of good response. Patients diagnosed with CM who received onabotulinumtoxinA were included in this single-center, real-world retrospective cohort study. Monthly headache days (MHDs), monthly migraine days (MMDs), headache intensity (numeric rating scale-NRS) and headache characteristics were evaluated at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores, 12-item Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Response to onabotulinumtoxinA (% reduction in MHDs) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also evaluated. OnabotulinumA was applied to the masseter muscles in patients complaining of bruxism. A total of 72 patients (mean ± SD age: 36.3 ± 8.5 years; 91.7% were female) diagnosed with CM were included. OnabotulinumtoxinA revealed significant decrease in median (IQR) MHDs [from 20(15-25) at baseline to 6(4-10), p < 0.001], MMDs [from 9(6-12) to 3(1-6), p < 0.001] and NRS [from 9(8-10) to 7(6-8), p < 0.001], and the MIDAS [from 54(30-81) to 16(7-24), p < 0.001], HIT-6 [from 67(65-69) to 58(54-64), p < 0.001], ASC-12 [from 6(1.5-9) to 2(0-9), p = 0.002], BAI [from 12(6.5-19) to 9(3-17), p < 0.001] and BDI [from 11(6.5-17) to 3(2-7) p < 0.001] scores at 12 weeks post-treatment. Patients complaining of bruxism received onabotulinumtoxinA injections in the first n = 27 (37.5%) and 12. week post-treatment n = 19 (70.4%) periods. Overall, 70.8% of patients responded (≥50% reduction in MHDs), while 29.2% did not (<50% reduction). Both groups showed similar characteristics in demographics, migraine history, baseline PROMs scores, comorbidities, and prior treatments. OnabotulinumtoxinA is an effective treatment option that rapidly improves migraine outcomes, disability, and impact while also alleviating comorbid depression and/or anxiety. This study's noteworthy finding is that onabotulinumtoxinA is effective in a majority of CM patients, irrespective of their prior treatment history, migraine characteristics, or concurrent comorbidities. Furthermore, we identified no specific predictors for a favorable response to onabotulinumtoxinA. Applying onabotulinumtoxinA to the masseter muscles can relieve discomfort associated with concurrent bruxism; however, it does not impact migraine outcomes.

Comparative effectiveness and tolerability of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine: A multicenter, real-world study in Taiwan.

To compare the real-world effectiveness and tolerability of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine (CM) patients. This multicenter study involved retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of CM patients treated with CGRP mAbs or onabotulinumtoxinA, including difficult-to-treat (DTT) patients (i.e., ≥3 preventive failures). Treatment outcomes were determined at 6 months based on prospective headache diaries and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS). The study included 316 (55 M/261F, mean age 44.4 ± 13.5 years) and 333 (61 M/272F, mean age 47.9 ± 13.4 years) CM patients treated with CGRP mAbs or onabotulinbumtoxinA, respectively. At 6 months, CGRP mAb treatment was associated with a greater decrease in monthly migraine days (MMDs) (-13.0 vs. -8.7 days/month, p < 0.001) and a higher ≥50% responder rate (RR) (74.7% vs. 50.7%, p < 0.001) compared with onabotulinumtoxinA injections. The findings were consistent in DTT patients (-13.0 vs. -9.1 MMDs, p < 0.001; ≥50% RR: 73.9% vs. 50.3%, p < 0.001) or those with medication-overuse headache (MOH) (-13.3 vs. -9.0 MMDs, p < 0.001; ≥50% RR: 79.0% vs. 51.6%, p < 0.001). Besides, patients receiving CGRP mAbs had greater improvement (-42.2 vs. -11.8, p < 0.001) and a higher ≥50% RR (62.0% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.001) in MIDAS scores and a lower rate of adverse events (AEs) (6.0% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001). However, none of the patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. In this multicenter, real-world study, CGRP mAbs were more effective than onabotulinumtoxinA in CM patients, even in DTT or MOH patients. All of these injectables were well tolerated. Further prospective studies are needed to verify these findings.

Onabotulinum toxin injections for shoulder and chest wall muscle pain in breast cancer survivors: retrospective study – preliminary report

ObjectivesThe primary objective of this retrospective review is to describe patient-reported improvement in muscular pain after initial treatment with onabotulinum toxin. A secondary objective was to determine other physiatry (physical...

OnabotulinumtoxinA is now an important tool for managing pediatric neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Initial urologic management of pediatric neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) includes clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) regimen and use of anticholinergic or beta3 agonist medications. Historically, NLUTD that did not respond to these initial management strategies received open surgical procedures such as augmentation cystoplasty (AC) to increase bladder capacity and create a lower-pressure reservoir. Since its first reported use in 2002, intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) injections has developed an emerging role in management of pediatric NLUTD, culminating in its recent FDA-approval in 2021. In this review, the current evidence regarding the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of BTX-A use in pediatric NLUTD will be summarized. Additionally, we will attempt to define the current role of BTX-A in the management of patients with NLUTD, discuss limitations to the current body of literature, and suggest future avenues of study.

Onabotulinumtoxina (craniotomy scar combined with cranial suture line injections) for persistent post craniotomy headache: Case series with long-term follow-up.

There is no defined preventive treatment protocol for persistent post-craniotomy headache. In several small case series and individual case reports onabotulinumtoxinA injected into the craniotomy scar has shown possible efficacy. What is lacking is long term follow-up and if focusing on the cranial suture lines along with the craniotomy scar can enhance improvement and provide more sustained benefit. Retrospective chart review with case series. Four patients (three women, one man) with ICHD-3 defined persistent post craniotomy headache were treated using a novel onabotulinumtoxinA injection protocol. All the patients presented with continuous head pain of moderate to severe intensity. All had severe allodynia on the side of their craniotomy. All had significant reduction in quality of life. Our application of onabotulinumtoxinA involved injection into both the surgical scar and the transected/irritated cranial suture lines noted on neuroimaging and physical examination. With treatment all patients demonstrated significant benefit including a reduction in daily pain intensity (75%-100%), developing periods of pain freedom (2-7 days per week) and having a dramatic improvement in quality of life (close to 100% in all). The benefit was sustained for at least five years of follow-up. From our case series it appears that injection not only along the painful craniotomy scar but into the involved cranial suture lines provides positive efficacy and sustained improvement in patients with persistent post craniotomy headache.

Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in Pediatric Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Diagnostic and Management Concerns.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is increasing in the pediatric population and, as in adults, symptoms vary among patients. In children the first manifestations can sometimes overlap with acute neurological symptoms. Urological symptoms have not been much studied in childhood. We shared our experience with MS urological manifestation in children. This article is a retrospective evaluation of all children with MS, according to the Krupp criteria, who also present with urological symptoms. We collected demographic and clinical history, the MR localization of demyelinating lesions, urological symptoms, and exams. We report on six MS pediatric cases with urological manifestation. Urinary symptoms, characterized by urinary incontinence in five patients and urinary retention in one patient, appeared in a different time frame from MS diagnosis. Urodynamic exams showed both overactive and underactive bladder patterns. Treatment was defined according to lower urinary tract dysfunction, using clean intermittent catheterization, oxybutynin, and intradetrusor Onabotulinum Toxin-A injection. A low acceptance rate of invasive evaluation and urological management was observed. The MS diagnosis was traumatic for all our patients. We believe it is important to address urological care in young people from the time of diagnosis for prompt management; it could be useful to include a pediatric urologist in multidisciplinary teams.

Sequential administration of peripheral nerve blocks andonabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of chronic migraine andother headache disorders-A retrospective tolerability and safety study.

To determine the tolerability and safety of concurrent peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA treatment during a single outpatient clinic procedure visit. Procedural interventions are available for the treatment of headache disorders. OnabotulinumtoxinA and peripheral nerve blocks are used as alternatives or in addition to oral therapies to reduce the frequency and intensity of migraine attacks. There is currently a lack of safety data focusing on the sequential administration of local anesthetic via peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA during a single clinical encounter for the treatment of headache. The primary aim of the study was to determine the safety and tolerability of concurrent peripheral nerve blockade and onabotulinumtoxinA injections during a single outpatient clinic procedure visit. We hypothesized that the dual intervention would be safe and well tolerated by patients with chronic migraine and other headache disorders. A retrospective chart review was performed using clinical data from patients seen by multiple providers over a 16-month timeframe at one outpatient headache clinic. Patients were identified by procedure codes and those receiving peripheral nerve block(s) and onabotulinumtoxinA injections during a single encounter within the study period were eligible for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients 18 years and older who were (2) receiving both peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA injections for the treatment of chronic migraine. Patients were excluded if they were under age 18, received their procedure outside of the clinic (emergency room, inpatient ward), or were receiving sphenopalatine ganglion blocks. Age- and sex-matched patients who received one procedure, either peripheral nerve blocks or onabotulinumtoxinA, were used for control. The primary outcome of this safety study was the number of adverse events that occurred in the dual intervention group compared to the single intervention control arms. Information regarding adverse events was gathered via retrospective chart review. If an adverse event was recorded, it was then graded by the reviewer utilizing the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ranging from Grade 1 Mild Event to Grade 5 Death. Additionally, it was noted whether the adverse event led to treatment discontinuation. In total, 375 patients were considered eligible for inclusion in the study. After age and sex matching of controls, 131 patients receiving dual intervention were able to be compared to 131 patients receiving onabotulinumtoxinA alone and 104 patients receiving dual intervention were able to be compared to 104 patients receiving peripheral nerve block(s) alone. The primary endpoint analysis showed no significant difference in total adverse events between dual intervention compared to nerve blocks alone or onabotulinumtoxinA alone. The number of adverse events that led to treatment discontinuation approached but did not reach statistical significance for those receiving dual intervention versus onabotulinumtoxinA alone in the number of adverse events that led to treatment termination (4.6%, 6/131 vs. 0.8%, 1/131, p = 0.065); however, the number of patients who discontinued therapy was not significantly different between those groups (2.3%, 3/131 vs. 0.8%, 1/131; p = 0.314; odds ratio 0.3 [0-3.2]; p = 0.338). In this retrospective chart review, there was no significant difference in adverse events or therapy discontinuation between patients receiving sequential peripheral nerve block(s) and onabotulinumtoxinA injections versus those receiving either peripheral nerve block(s) or onabotulinumtoxinA injections alone. As a result, we concluded that the combination procedure is likely safe and well tolerated in routine clinical practice.