BackgroundPatient-specific 3D computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have been used previously to identify the impact of injection parameters (e.g. injection location, velocity, etc.) on the particle distribution and the tumor dose during transarterial injection of radioactive microspheres for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, these simulations are computationally costly, so we aim to evaluate whether these can be reliably simplified. MethodsWe identified and applied five simplification strategies (i.e. truncation, steady flow modelling, moderate and severe grid coarsening, and reducing the number of cardiac cycles) to a patient-specific CFD setup. Subsequently, we evaluated whether these strategies can be used to (1) accurately predict the CFD output (i.e. particle distribution and tumor dose) and (2) quantify the sensitivity of the model output to a specific injection parameter (injection flow rate). ResultsFor both accuracy and sensitivity purposes, moderate grid coarsening is the most reliable simplification strategy, allowing to predict the tumor dose with only a maximal deviation of 1.4 %, and a similar sensitivity (deviation of 0.7 %). The steady strategy performs the worst, with a maximal deviation in the tumor dose of 20 % and a difference in sensitivity of 10 %. ConclusionThe patient-specific 3D CFD simulations of this study can be reliably simplified by coarsening the grid, decreasing the computational time by roughly 45 %, which works especially well for sensitivity studies.
Read full abstract