Initiation Of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Research Articles

Does preperitoneal packing increase venous thromboembolim risk among trauma patients? A prospective multicenter analysis across 17 level I trauma centers.

Pelvic fractures are associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Among treatment options, including pelvic angioembolization (PA), preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP), and pelvic open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), PPP has been postulated as a VTE risk factor. We aimed to characterize the risk of VTE among pelvic fracture patients receiving PPP, PA or ORIF. We used observational data from a 17-site Consortium of Leaders in the Study of Traumatic Thromboembolism (CLOTT) study group, a US level I trauma center collaborative working to identify factors associated with posttraumatic VTE, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or pulmonary thrombosis. The CLOTT criteria included age 18 to 40 years with at least one independent VTE risk factor. We compared outcomes of PPP, PA, and pelvic ORIF to reference of no pelvic intervention. Our primary outcome was VTE. A competing risk analysis was performed. Among 1,387 pelvic fracture patients, VTE incidence was 5.6%. The ORIF patients were most likely to develop VTE (24.7%), while VTE incidence for PPP was 9.0% and 2.6% for PA. After multivariate, risk-competing analysis, none of the three treatment interventions for pelvic fractures were significantly associated with VTE. Initiation of VTE prophylaxis in the first 24 hours of admission independently halved VTE incidence (hazard ratio, 0.55; confidence interval, 0.33-0.91). Pelvic fracture interventions do not appear to be independent risk factors for VTE in our study. Initiation of VTE pharmacoprophylaxis within the first 24 hours of admission remains critical to significantly decreasing VTE formation in this high-risk population. Therapeutic Study; Level III.

A collaborative multidisciplinary trauma program improvement team improves VTE chemoprophylaxis guideline compliance in non-operative stable TBI.

Delays in initiating venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI) persist despite guidelines recommending early initiation. We hypothesized that the expansion of a Trauma Program Performance Improvement (PI) team will improve compliance of early (24-48 hours) initiation of VTE prophylaxis and will decrease VTE events in TBI patients. We performed a single-center retrospective review of all TBI patients admitted to a Level I trauma center before (2015-2016,) and after (2019-2020,) the expansion of the Trauma Performance Improvement and Patient Safety (PIPS) team and the creation of trauma process and outcome dashboards. Exclusion criteria included discharge or death within 48 hours of admission, expanding intracranial hemorrhage on CT scan, and a neurosurgical intervention (craniotomy, pressure monitor, or drains) prior to chemoprophylaxis initiation. A total of 1,112 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 54% (n = 604) were admitted after Trauma PIPS expansion. Following the addition of a dedicated PIPS nurse in the trauma program and creation of process dashboards, the time from stable CT to VTE prophylaxis initiation decreased (52 hours to 35 hours; p < 0.001) and more patients received chemoprophylaxis at 24 hours to 48 hours (59% from 36%, p < 0.001) after stable head CT. There was no significant difference in time from first head CT to stable CT (9 vs. 9 hours; p = 0.15). The Contemporary group had a lower rate of VTE events (1% vs. 4%; p < 0.001) with no increase in bleeding events (2% vs. 2%; p = 0.97). On multivariable analysis, being in the Early cohort was an independent predictor of VTE events (adjusted odds ratio, 3.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-6.16). A collaborative multidisciplinary Trauma PIPS team improves guideline compliance. Initiation of VTE chemoprophylaxis within 24 hours to 48 hours of stable head CT is safe and effective. Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Propensity weighted analysis of chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis agents in isolated severe traumatic brain injury: An EAST sponsored multicenter study

BackgroundIn patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), clinicians must balance preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) with the risk of intracranial hemorrhagic expansion (ICHE). We hypothesized that low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) would not increase risk of ICHE or VTE as compared to unfractionated heparin (UH) in patients with severe TBI. MethodsPatients ≥ 18 years of age with isolated severe TBI (AIS ≥ 3), admitted to 24 level I and II trauma centers between January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2020 and who received subcutaneous UH and LMWH injections for chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (VTEP) were included. Primary outcomes were VTE and ICHE after VTEP initiation. Secondary outcomes were mortality and neurosurgical interventions. Entropy balancing (EBAL) weighted competing risk or logistic regression models were estimated for all outcomes with chemical VTEP agent as the predictor of interest. Results984 patients received chemical VTEP, 482 UH and 502 LMWH. Patients on LMWH more often had pre-existing conditions such as liver disease (UH vs LMWH 1.7 % vs. 4.4 %, p = 0.01), and coagulopathy (UH vs LMWH 0.4 % vs. 4.2 %, p < 0.001). There were no differences in VTE or ICHE after VTEP initiation. There were no differences in neurosurgical interventions performed. There were a total of 29 VTE events (3 %) in the cohort who received VTEP. A Cox proportional hazards model with a random effect for facility demonstrated no statistically significant differences in time to VTE across the two agents (p = 0.44). The LMWH group had a 43 % lower risk of overall ICHE compared to the UH group (HR = 0.57: 95 % CI = 0.32–1.03, p = 0.062), however was not statistically significant. ConclusionIn this multi-center analysis, patients who received LMWH had a decreased risk of ICHE, with no differences in VTE, ICHE after VTEP initiation and neurosurgical interventions compared to those who received UH. There were no safety concerns when using LMWH compared to UH. Level of evidenceLevel III, Therapeutic Care Management

Venous Thromboembolism Risk and Prophylaxis in the Acute Hospital Care Settings in Oman: A National Multicenter Cross-sectional Study.

To evaluate the prevalence of risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the proportion of at-risk patients who receive appropriate thromboprophylaxis among inpatients in acute hospital care settings in Oman. A related objective was to evaluate the type and time of initiation of VTE prophylaxis. This multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in three tertiary hospitals in Oman. The study included acutely ill medical and surgical inpatients admitted from August to September 2022. VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis were assessed based on the 2012 recommendations of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP). A total of 384 patients were enrolled, 240 were medical patients and 144 were surgical patients. As per the ACCP criteria, 179 (74.6%) of medical and 92 (63.9%) of surgical patients were at risk for VTE and required prophylaxis. Appropriate prophylaxis was received by 142 (79.3%) at-risk medical and 70 (76.1%) at-risk surgical patients. In cases where pharmacological prophylaxis was contraindicated, mechanical prophylaxis was markedly underused. For medical patients, the median day of initiating VTE prophylaxis was day one of admission. For surgical patients, the median day of initiating VTE prophylaxis was postoperative day one. The majority of hospitalized patients in Oman are at risk of VTE. However, a significant minority of patients do not receive the required pharmacological or mechanical prophylaxis. We recommend the development of a national VTE risk assessment and guiding tool with a facility for monitoring compliance.

Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism and Eventual Amputation in Traumatic Femoral and Iliac Vein Injuries: A Trauma Quality Improvement Program Analysis.

Iliac and femoral venous injuries represent a challenging dilemma in trauma surgery with mixed results. Venous restoration of outflow (via repair or bypass) has been previously identified as having higher rates of VTE (venous thromboembolism) compared to ligation. We hypothesized that rates of VTE and eventual amputation were similar whether restoration of venous outflow vs ligation was performed at initial operation. Patients in the 2019-2021 National Trauma Data Bank with iliac and femoral vein injuries were abstracted and analyzed. The primary outcomes of interest were in-hospital lower extremity amputation and VTE. A total of 2642 patients with operatively managed iliac and femoral vein injuries were identified VTE was found in 10.8% of patients. Multivariable logistic regression was performed and identified bowel injury, higher ISS, older age, open repair, and longer time to VTE prophylaxis initiation as independent predictors of VTE. Amputation was required in 4.2% of patients. Multivariable logistic regression identified arterial or nerve injury, femur or tibia fracture, venous ligation, percutaneous intervention, fasciotomy, bowel injury, and higher ISS as independent factors of amputation. Venous restoration was not an independent predictor of VTE. Venous ligation on index operation was the only modifiable independent predictor of amputation identified on regression analysis.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in Asian patients with severe COVID-19: A prospective cohort study

The severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers various coagulation cascades, culminating in the manifestation of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The efficacy of anticoagulant prophylaxis in averting VTE occurrence in severe COVID-19 cases in Thailand remains uncertain. We aimed to determine the prevalence of symptomatic VTE in patients with severe COVID-19 who received a standard dose of anticoagulants and to evaluate the risk factors. Our prospective cohort study included patients with severe COVID-19 who received anticoagulant prophylaxis. VTE, bleeding events and mortality were monitored until 60 days after VTE prophylaxis initiation. Of the 250 study patients, pulmonary embolism was observed in 7.2% of patients. In a multivariate Cox regression model, endotracheal intubation [hazard ratio (HR) = 13.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.87–65.82; p = 0.001] and high D-dimer levels [HR = 1.052; 95% CI = 1.023–1.081; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher VTE risk within 60 days of VTE prophylaxis. Bleeding and major hemorrhage occurred in 35 (14%) and eight (3.2%) patients, respectively. These findings indicated that a standard dose of anticoagulant may not be sufficient for preventing thrombosis in patients who require intensive care. Further research on the appropriate dose is necessary.

Streamlining care in two neurosurgical practices in a rural trauma center

ABSTRACT To maximize cost-effective care and evaluate the use of physician associates/assistants (PAs) and NPs in an academic inpatient setting, we investigated the effect of streamlining care by using a common PA position between two neurosurgery groups. Trauma registry data were obtained and analyzed to gain insight into hospital length of stay (LOS) and clinical outcomes before and after implementing this new position. The average hospital LOS was reduced for less severely injured patients, and the time to initiation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis decreased for injured neurosurgical patients. These results indicate the successful facilitation of time-sensitive, value-based healthcare for this specific clinical population at our Level 2 trauma center.

Body Mass Index and Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Traumatic Brain Injury

IntroductionPatients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at risk for developing venous thromboembolic complications. Previous work suggests venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is protective compared to unfractionated heparin (UH) in trauma patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of body mass index (BMI) and type of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in patients who develop VTE with severe TBI. MethodsPatients with a severe TBI who received VTE prophylaxis were queried from the 2019 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. Demographics, injury characteristics, timing of VTE prophylaxis, and BMI were collected. Outcome measures include VTE, mortality, and neurosurgical interventions. ResultsOf the 39,520 patients with severe TBI included in the study, 25,671 received LMWH and 13,849 received UH. Multivariable logistic regression found patients with a BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2 (odds ratio [OR] 1.375; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.180-1.603; P < 0.0001) and a BMI>30 kg/m2 (OR 1.831; 95% CI 1.570-2.137; P < 0.0001) were independent predictors of VTE. Patients with BMI of 25-29.9 kg/m2 (OR 1.145; 95% CI 1.016-1.289; P = 0.0265) have a higher risk of mortality. For every hour delay in initiation to VTE prophylaxis, patients were 0.2% more likely to develop VTE (OR 1.002; 95% CI 1.002-1.003; P < 0.0001). Patients treated with UH were more likely to develop VTE complications (OR 1.085; 95% CI 1.058-1.112; P < 0.0001) and have increased mortality (OR 1.116; 95% CI 1.094-1.139; P < 0.0001), regardless of BMI and time to initiation of prophylaxis, compared to patients treated with LMWH. ConclusionsIn patients with severe TBI, higher BMI was associated with an increased risk of VTE and death. Delay in VTE prophylaxis initiation was associated with an increased risk of VTE. LMWH had a protective association with VTE.

The Association Between the Timing of Initiation of Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis with Outcomes in Burns Patients.

Hospitalized burn patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Guidelines regarding thromboprophylaxis in burn patients are unclear. This study aims to compare the outcomes of early versus late thromboprophylaxis initiation in burn patients. In this 3-year analysis of 2017-2019 ACS-TQIP, adult(18-64years) burn patients were identified after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria and stratified based on timing of initiation of VTE prophylaxis: Early(<24 hours of admission); Late(>24 hours). Outcomes were deep venous thrombosis(DVT), pulmonary embolism(PE), unplanned return to operating room (OR), unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, post-prophylaxis packed red blood cells (PRBC) transfusion, and mortality. Nine thousand two hundred and seventy-two patients were identified. Overall, median age was 41years, 71.5% were male, and median[IQR] injury severity score was 3[1-8]. 53% had second-degree burns, and 80% had less than 40% of total body surface area affected. Median time to thromboprophylaxis initiation was 11[6-20.6]hours. Overall VTE rate was 0.9% (DVT-0.7%, PE-0.2%). On univariable analysis, early prophylaxis group had lower rates of DVT(0.6% vs 1.1%, P = .025), and PE(0.1% vs 0.6%, P < .001). On multivariable regression, late prophylaxis was associated with 1.8 times higher odds of DVT (aOR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.04-3.11, P = .03), 4.8 times higher odds of PE(aOR = 4.8, 95% CI = 1.9-11.9, P < .001), and 2 times higher odds of unplanned ICU admission(aOR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.4-3.1, P < .001). Furthermore, early thromboprophylaxis was not associated with increased odds of post-prophylaxis PRBC transfusion(aOR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.8-1.4, P = .4), and mortality(aOR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.4-1.1, P = .13). Early VTE prophylaxis in burn patients is associated with decreased rates of DVT and PE, without increasing the risk of bleeding and mortality. VTE prophylaxis may be initiated within 24 hours of admission to reduce VTE in this high-risk patient population.

289 The Timing of Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Initiation for Burn Patients with Concomitant Trauma

Abstract Introduction Hospitalized burn patients are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Clinical guidelines regarding thromboprophylaxis in burn patients with concomitant trauma are unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes of early versus late thromboprophylaxis initiation for burn patients with concomitant trauma. Methods A 3-year analysis of 2017-2019 TQIP. We identified all adult burn patients with concomitant trauma who received thromboprophylaxis. We excluded patients that had severe TBI (Head AIS &amp;gt; 2), were transferred, those that died &amp;lt; 24 hours of admission and those that underwent hemorrhage control surgery. Patients were stratified based on the timing of initiation of postoperative thromboprophylaxis: Early (&amp;lt; 24 hours of admission) versus Late ( &amp;gt;24 hours). Multivariate regression analyses were performed. Outcome measures were odds of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), unplanned return to OR, unplanned ICU admission, post-prophylaxis PRBC transfusion and in-hospital mortality. Results 9,272 trauma patients with concomitant burns who received thromboprophylaxis were identified. Overall, mean age was 41.3 ± 13.4 years, 71.5% were male, and median ISS was 3 [1-8]. 53% had second degree burns, and 39% had more than 10% of total body surface area affected. Median time to thromboprophylaxis initiation was 11 [6-20.6] hours. On multivariate regression, patients who received thromboprophylaxis after 24 hours of admission had 1.8 times higher odds of developing DVT (aOR=1.8, 95% CI=1.04-3.11, p=0.03), 4.8 times higher odds of developing PE (aOR=4.8, 95% CI=1.9-11.9, p&amp;lt;.001), 2 times higher odds of unplanned ICU admission (aOR=2.1, 95% CI=1.4-3.1, p&amp;lt;0.001), and nonsignificant increase in the odds of unplanned return to OR (aOR=2, 95% CI=0.96-4.31, p=0.06). Further, early thromboprophylaxis was not associated with increased odds of post-prophylaxis PRBC transfusion (aOR=1.1, 95% CI=0.8-1.4, p=0.4), and in-hospital mortality (aOR=0.68, 95%CI=0.4-1.1, p=0.13) compared to patients who received late thromboprophylaxis. Conclusions Early VTE prophylaxis in burn patients is associated with decreased rates of DVT and PE, without increasing the risk of bleeding and mortality. VTE prophylaxis may be initiated within 24 hours of admission to reduce VTE in this high-risk patient population. Applicability of Research to Practice This work will guide the timing of initiation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in burn patients with concomitant trauma

Angioembolization in Severe Pelvic Trauma is Associated with Venous Thromboembolism

IntroductionManagement of hemorrhage from pelvic fractures is complex and requires multidisciplinary attention. Pelvic angioembolization (AE) has become a key intervention to aid in obtaining definitive hemorrhage control. We hypothesized that pelvic AE would be associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). MethodsAll adults (age >16) with a severe pelvic fracture (Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥ 4) secondary to a blunt traumatic mechanism in the 2017-2019 American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database were included. Patients who did not receive VTE prophylaxis during their admission were excluded. Patients who underwent pelvic AE during the first 24 h of admission were compared to those who did not using propensity score matching. Matching was performed based on patient demographics, admission physiology, comorbidities, injury severity, associated injuries, other hemorrhage control procedures, and VTE prophylaxis type, and time to initiation of VTE prophylaxis. The rates of VTE (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) were compared between the matched groups. ResultsOf 72,985 patients with a severe blunt pelvic fracture, 1887 (2.6%) underwent pelvic AE during the first 24 h of admission versus 71,098 (97.4%) who did not. Pelvic AE patients had a higher median Injury Severity Score and more often required other hemorrhage control procedures, with laparotomy being most common (24.7%). The median time to initiation of VTE prophylaxis in pelvic AE versus no pelvic AE patients was 60.1 h (interquartile range = 36.6-98.6) versus 27.7 h (interquartile range = 13.9-52.4), respectively. After propensity score matching, pelvic AE patients were more likely to develop VTE compared to no pelvic AE patients (11.8% versus 9.5%, P = 0.03). ConclusionsPelvic AE for control of hemorrhage from severe pelvic fractures is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital VTE. Patients who undergo pelvic AE are especially high risk for VTE and should be started as early as safely possible on VTE prophylaxis.

Racial Disparities in Administration of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Severe Traumatic Injuries.

Race is associated with differences in quality of care process measures and incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in trauma patients. We aimed to investigate if racial disparities exist in the administration of VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients. We queried the Trauma Quality Improvement Project database from 2017 to 2019. Patients ages ≥16years old with ISS ≥15 were included. Patients with no signs of life on arrival, any AIS ≥6, hospital length of stay <1day, anticoagulant use before admission, or without recorded race were excluded. Patients were grouped by race: white, black, Asian, American Indian, and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander. The association between VTE prophylaxis administration and race was determined using a Poisson regression model with robust standard errors to adjust for confounders. A total of 285,341 patients were included. Black patients had the highest rates of VTE prophylaxis exposure (73.8%), shortest time to administration (1.6 days), and highest use of low molecular weight heparin (56%). Black patients also had the highest incidence of deep vein thrombosis (2.8%) and pulmonary embolism (1.4%). Black patients were 4% more likely to receive VTE prophylaxis than white patients [adj. IRR (95% CI): 1.04 (1.03-1.05), P < .001]. American Indians were 8% less likely to receive VTE prophylaxis [adj. IRR (95% CI): .92 (.88-.97), P < .001] than white patients. No differences between white and Asian or Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander patients existed. While black patients had the highest incidence of DVT and PE, they had higher administration rates and earlier initiation of VTE prophylaxis. Further work can elucidate modifiable causes of these differences.

SP5.1.3 Early initiation of chemical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following traumatic spleen injury is safe and effectively reduce VTE events

Abstract Aims Within the first 48 hours (h) of trauma, hyper-coagulation state occurs which put trauma patients at risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), leading to an increase rate of mortality. Non operative management (NOM) is now the standard of care for traumatic splenic injuries (TSI). However, timing of initiating chemical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, heparin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), remains controversial due to concern of rebleeding. This study examines the safety and timing of initiating VTE prophylaxis post TSI. Methods Patients with TSI were identified from prospectively maintained Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database from 2015–2020 in a single tertiary trauma centre. Clinical and radiological information were collected retrospectively. TSI were graded using AAST classification. VTE prophylaxis initiation were categorised as not given, &amp;lt;48h and &amp;gt;48h following the injury. Results In total 102 patients were included. Fifty-three percent (54/102) had Grade 3 injury and above. Majority 90/102 (88%) of patients were treated non-operatively. VTE prophylaxis was not given for 31 (30.4%), initiated for 37 (36.3%) within 48h and given to 34 (33.3%) patients after 48h. Seven (7%) patients developed thromboembolic events, majority of which (6/7) received VTE prophylaxis after 48h. None of the patients who received VTE prophylaxis had rebleeding. Conclusions This study showed that early initiation of chemical VTE prophylaxis (&amp;lt;48h) is safe, resulted in lower incidence of DVTs/PEs without increase risk of bleeding. Results from this study supports recommendation from other studies to initiate chemical VTE prophylaxis after TSI as early as 24h post injury.

Early start of thromboprophylaxis does not increase risk of intracranial hematoma progression in multiply injured patients with traumatic brain injury

ABSTRACT Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in severely injured patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a risk during the clinical course. Data on the safety of an early initiation of pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in severely injured patients with concomitant severe TBI is sparse. Methods Admissions to our level-1-trauma center between January 2015 and December 2018 were screened. Patients suffering from severe TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) of the head ≥3) and at least one further AIS ≥ 3 in any other body region were included. Demographic data, thromboembolic events, and progression of the intracranial hemorrhage were extracted from the patient’s charts. According to the first application of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (VTEp), patients were categorized either to the early, the late (later than 24 h) or the no therapy group. Results In 79 patients (early: n = 35, late: n = 29, no therapy: n = 15) the Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 36.7 ± 12.7 points (AIShead 4.1 ± 0.8). No differences were found regarding the progression of the intracranial hemorrhage after initiation of the VTE prophylaxis (adj. p = 0.8). The VTE rate was low (n = 1, 1.6%). Conclusion In severely injured patients with severe TBI, the early administration of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis did not result in a higher rate of intracranial hematoma progression.

Effects of Early Chemoprophylaxis in Traumatic Brain Injury and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism.

The optimal timing to initiate venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in patients with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) is still unknown. We designed a study to determine the effect that timing of initiation of VTE prophylaxis has on VTE rates in TBI patients. Patient records were obtained from 32 level 1 and 2 trauma centers in the Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program from 2008 to 2018. Overall, 5589 patients with a TBI were included and split into cohorts based on VTE prophylaxis initiation time. Outcomes included rate of VTE, mortality, and serious in-hospital complications. There were nine patients (1.3%) in the <24hour group with a VTE as compared to 36 (2.6%) in the 24-48hour group, 51 (4.1%) in the 48-72hour group, and 181 (8.1%) in the >72hour group (P < .001). The adjusted odds of VTE were significantly greater in patients initiated within 48-72hours (AOR 2.861, 95% CI 1.271-6.439) and >72hours (AOR 3.963, 95% CI 1.824-8.612) compared to <24hours. Patients that received VTE prophylaxis within 24hours had similar rates of serious in-hospital complication as patients initiated within 24-48hours (AOR .956, 95% CI .637-1.434) and 48-72hour (AOR 1.132, 95% CI .757-1.692) but less than the >72hour group (AOR 1.662, 95% CI 1.154-2.393) groups. Patients initiated on VTE prophylaxis within 48hours of presentation had lower incidence of VTE without a significant increase in serious complications.

Early initiation of thromboembolic prophylaxis in critically ill trauma patients with high-grade blunt liver and splenic lacerations is not associated with increased rates of failure of non-operative management

Background Non-operative management (NOM) is the current standard of care of hemodynamically stable patients with traumatic blunt solid abdominal organ injuries. Guidelines do not define the optimal timing of initiation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in this population, and fear of failure of NOM may lead to delayed initiation of prophylaxis specifically in patients with high-grade injuries. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective study of patients with high-grade (AAST grades ≥3) blunt liver and splenic lacerations presenting to our level 1 trauma center between January 2010 and October 2017. Patients were divided into groups based on timing of low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) initiation for VTE prophylaxis. The primary outcome was rate of failure of NOM, defined as the need for interventional radiology or surgical intervention for management of abdominal organ bleeding. Secondary outcomes included rates of VTE, lengths of ICU and hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. Results A total of 207 patients with high-grade blunt liver and splenic injuries undergoing an initial attempt at NOM were identified. The distribution of grades 3, 4, and 5 liver and splenic injuries were similar across all groups. Overall, 55.5% of patients received LMWH during their index admission. Early administration of LMWH was not associated with a statistically significant increased risk of failure of NOM ( p = 0.054). Rates of VTE and in-hospital mortality were similar. Conclusions Early initiation of VTE prophylaxis was not associated with an increased rate of failure of NOM in patients with high-grade blunt abdominal organ injuries in patients who survived 24 h post-admission and did not require massive transfusion; however, the study was likely underpowered to detect a difference among groups due to small sample size.

Early pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis after splenectomy is associated with better outcomes: A matched cohort study

BackgroundThis study aimed to explore the timing of pharmacologic prophylaxis initiation after trauma splenectomy and the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE). MethodsRetrospective review of American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database 2013–2017. Adults (>16 years) with isolated splenic injuries who underwent splenectomy and received pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis were stratified based on timing of initiation of prophylaxis: ≤48 h (EARLY) or > 48 h (LATE) from admission. Patients were matched for demographic and clinical characteristics and outcomes compared. Results3631 patients were included. On logistic regression, LATE prophylaxis was associated with DVT (OR 2.317, p < 0.001) and VTE (OR 2.064, p < 0.001). Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was protective for DVT (OR 0.621, p = 0.014) and VTE (OR 0.667, p = 0.015). 1196 patients with EARLY prophylaxis were matched with 1196 patients with LATE prophylaxis. VTE and overall complications were significantly higher in the LATE group (7.4% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.001 and 25.8% vs 16.6%, p < 0.001). ConclusionsLate initiation of VTE prophylaxis is associated with DVT and VTE in post-splenectomy patients, while LMWH is protective.

Association of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Neurosurgical Intervention for Traumatic Brain Injury With Thromboembolic Complications, Repeated Neurosurgery, and Mortality

There is a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis among patients who undergo neurosurgical interventions for traumatic brain injury (TBI). To measure the association between timing of VTE prophylaxis after urgent neurosurgical intervention for TBI and thromboembolic and intracranial complications. This retrospective cohort study included adult patients (aged ≥16 years) who underwent urgent neurosurgical interventions (craniotomy/craniectomy or intracranial monitor/drain insertion within 24 hours after admission) for TBI at level 1 and 2 trauma centers participating in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016. Data were analyzed from January to August 2020. Timing of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis initiation after urgent neurosurgical intervention (prophylaxis delay) measured in days (24-hour periods). The primary outcome was VTE (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism). Secondary outcomes were repeated neurosurgery (neurosurgical reintervention after initiation of VTE prophylaxis) and mortality. Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between prophylaxis delay and each outcome at the patient level and were adjusted for patient baseline and injury characteristics. The study included 4951 patients (3676 [74%] male; median age, 50 years [IQR, 31-64 years]) who underwent urgent neurosurgical intervention for TBI at 304 trauma centers. The median prophylaxis delay was 3 days (IQR, 1-5 days). After adjustment for patient baseline and injury characteristics, prophylaxis delay was associated with increased odds of VTE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.08 per day; 95% CI, 1.04-1.12). Earlier initiation of prophylaxis was associated with increased risk of repeated neurosurgery. During the first 3 days, each additional day of prophylaxis delay was associated with a 28% decrease in odds of repeated neurosurgery (aOR, 0.72 per day; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88). After 3 days, each additional day of prophylaxis delay was associated with an additional 15% decrease in odds of repeated neurosurgery (aOR, 0.85 per day; 95% CI, 0.80-0.90). Earlier prophylaxis was associated with greater mortality among patients who initially underwent intracranial monitor/drain procedures, such that each additional day of prophylaxis delay was associated with decreased odds of death (aOR, 0.94 per day; 95% CI, 0.89-0.99). In this cohort study of patients who underwent urgent neurosurgical interventions for TBI, early pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was associated with reduced risk of thromboembolism. However, earlier initiation of prophylaxis was associated with increased risk of repeated neurosurgery. These findings suggest that although timely initiation of prophylaxis should be prioritized, caution should be used particularly during the first 3 days after the index procedure, when this risk appears to be highest.

Early Chemoprophylaxis Against Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Timing to start of chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains controversial. We hypothesize that early administration is not associated with increased intracranial hemorrhage. A retrospective study of adult patients with TBI following blunt injury was performed. Patients with penetrating brain injury, any moderate/severe organ injury other than the brain, need for craniotomy/craniectomy, death within 24hours of admission, or progression of bleed on 6hour follow-up head computed tomography scan were excluded. Patients were divided into early (≤24hours) and late (>24hours) cohorts based on time to initiation of chemoprophylaxis. Progression of bleed was the primary outcome. 264 patients were enrolled, 40% of whom were in the early cohort. The average time to VTE prophylaxis initiation was 17hours and 47hours in the early and late groups, respectively (P < .0001). There was no difference in progression of bleed (5.6% vs. 7%, P = .67), craniectomy/-craniotomy rate (1.9% vs. 2.5%, P = .81), or VTE rate (0% vs. 2.5%, P = .1). Early chemoprophylaxis is not associated with progression of hemorrhage or need for neurosurgical intervention in patients with TBI and a stable head CT 7hours following injury.

When Is It Safe to Start Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Pelvic Fractures? A Prospective Study From a Level I Trauma Center

BackgroundThe ideal time for pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis initiation after pelvic fracture is controversial. This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of early VTE prophylaxis after blunt pelvic trauma. MethodsPatients presenting to our American College of Surgeons–verified level I trauma center (between December 1, 2016 and November 30, 2017) with blunt pelvic fracture were prospectively screened. Exclusion criteria were emergency department death, immediate operative intervention, transfers, home anticoagulation, pregnancy, and patients receiving no pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis during hospitalization. Patients were dichotomized into study groups based on VTE prophylaxis initiation time ≤48 h (early prophylaxis [EP]) versus >48 h (late prophylaxis [LP]) after emergency department arrival. Demographics, injury data, clinical data, VTE prophylaxis agent and initiation time, and outcomes were compared. ResultsAfter exclusions, 146 patients were identified: 74 (51%) patients in EP group and 72 (49%) patients in LP group. Pelvic fracture severity was comparable between groups (Abbreviated Injury Scale extremity score 2 [2-3] versus 2 [2-3]; P = 0.610). On univariate analysis, deep vein thrombosis rates were higher after LP (n = 5, 7% versus 0, 0%; P = 0.027). Pulmonary embolism rates were similar (n = 2, 3% versus n = 3, 4%; P = 1.000). No patient required delayed intervention for bleeding, and postprophylaxis blood transfusion was comparable between groups (P > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, timing of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis initiation was not associated with VTE development (odds ratio, 0.647; P = 0.999). Pelvic angioembolization was independently associated with VTE (odds ratio, 1.296; P = 0.044). ConclusionsEarly initiation of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis after blunt pelvic fracture is safe. Although EP initiation did not reduce the rate of VTE, these data identify angioembolization as an independent risk factor for VTE. Patients with blunt pelvic fracture who undergo angioembolization may therefore represent a high-risk population who may especially benefit from EP.