Initiation Of Second-line Therapy Research Articles

Clinical features and treatment outcomes of liver involvement in paediatric Langerhans cell histiocytosis

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is the most common histiocytic disorder in children, and liver involvement in LCH is rare. This retrospective study reported the clinical features and prognosis of patients with hepatic LCH. Liver involvement was defined by histopathological findings, liver dysfunction or abnormalities, or ultrasound imaging. A total of 130 patients (14.5%) with hepatic LCH out of 899 in the LCH population were enrolled. Patients with liver involvement had greater frequencies of skin, lung, hearing system, and haematologic system involvement, and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (P<0.001, 0.001, 0.002, 0.009, and <0.001, respectively). Overall survival and progression-free survival were lower in LCH patients with liver involvement than in those without liver involvement (P<0.001 and <0.001). In patients with liver involvement, the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were lower in patients with cholangitis than in those without cholangitis (P<0.020 and 0.030). For the treatment response, the response rate of hepatic LCH patients to initial first-line therapy (n=89) was 22.5%. However, there was no significant difference in the response rate or recurrence rate between patients who shifted from first-line treatment to second-line treatment (n=29) or to targeted therapy (n=13) (P=0.453 and 1.000). The response rate of hepatic LCH patients who received initial second-line therapy (n=13) was 38.5%. Two of these patients subsequently experienced bone recurrence. The response rate of hepatic LCH patients who received initial targeted therapy (n=16) was 75.0%. Three patients subsequently experienced recurrence, including 2 in the bone and 1 in the liver and skin. A total of 39.3% of patients who received second-line treatment had severe myelosuppression (grade III-IV), and 50.8% had varying degrees of gastrointestinal events, whereas there was no severe toxicity in patients who received first-line treatment and targeted therapy. Four patients underwent liver transplantation because of liver cirrhosis. The patients’ liver disease improved within a follow-up period of 18-79 months. This study demonstrated that LCH with liver involvement, especially cholangitis, indicates a poor prognosis. Targeted therapy provides a good treatment response and less toxicity. However, it may relapse after withdrawal. Liver transplantation is still a reliable salvage option for patients with end-stage liver disease.

The MAGIC algorithm probability predicts treatment response and long-term outcomes to second-line therapy for acute GVHD

AbstractThe significance of biomarkers in second-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has not been well characterized. We analyzed clinical data and serum samples at the initiation of second-line systemic treatment of acute GVHD from 167 patients from 17 centers of the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) between 2016 and 2021. Sixty-two patients received ruxolitinib-based therapy, whereas 102 received other systemic agents. In agreement with prospective trials, ruxolitinib resulted in a higher day 28 (D28) overall response Frate than nonruxolitinib therapies (55% vs 31%, P = .003) and patients who received ruxolitinib had significantly lower nonrelapse mortality (NRM) than those who received nonruxolitinib therapies (point estimates at 2-year: 35% vs 61%, P = .002). Biomarker analyses demonstrated that the benefit from ruxolitinib was observed only in patients with low MAGIC algorithm probabilities (MAPs) at the start of second-line treatment. Among patients with a low MAP, those who received ruxolitinib experienced significantly lower NRM than those who received nonruxolitinib therapies (point estimates at 2-year: 12% vs 41%, P = .016). However, patients with high MAP experienced high NRM regardless of treatment with ruxolitinib or nonruxolitinib therapies (point estimates at 2-year: 67% vs 80%, P = .65). A landmark analysis demonstrated that the relationship between the D28 response and NRM largely depends on the MAP level at the initiation of second-line therapy. In conclusion, MAP measured at second-line systemic treatment for acute GVHD predicts treatment response and NRM. The outcomes of patients with high MAP are poor regardless of treatment choice, and ruxolitinib appears to primarily benefit patients with low MAP.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes from a retrospective chart review study of patients with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer who progressed following prior systemic therapy in Europe

ObjectiveTo evaluate real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer patients who progressed following prior systemic therapy in clinical practice in Europe.DesignEndometrial Cancer Health Outcomes-Europe (ECHO-EU) is a...

Evaluating the efficacy of combination and single-agent immunotherapies in real-world patterns of disease progression and survival of metastatic melanoma patients.

The objective of this study is to describe survival outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma in a real-world setting receiving combination and single-agent immunotherapy outside the clinical trial context. We conducted a retrospective single-institution study of patients with metastatic melanoma in a real-world setting. Survival was calculated using log-rank test. Contingency tables were analyzed using Fisher's Exact test. CD8 + T-cell densities were measured using quantitative immunofluorescence and analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test. The median overall survival (OS) for 132 patients was 45.3 months. Brain metastasis did not confer a higher risk of death relative to liver and/or bone disease (39.53 versus 30.00 months, respectively; P = 0.687). Anti-PD-1 monotherapy was the most common first-line treatment, received by 49.2% of patients. There was no significant difference in OS between patients receiving single-agent anti-PD-1 and combination anti-PD-1 plus CTLA-4 (39.4 months versus undefined; P = 0.643). Patients treated with combination therapy were more likely to be alive without progression at the last follow-up than those who received monotherapy (70.4% versus 49.2%; P = 0.0408). Median OS was 21.8 months after initiation of second-line therapy after anti-PD-1 monotherapy. CD8+ T-cell densities were higher in patients who achieved disease control on first-line immunotherapy ( P = 0.013). In a real-world setting, patients with metastatic melanoma have excellent survival rates, and treatment benefit can be achieved even after progression on first-line therapy. Combination immunotherapy may produce more favorable long-term outcomes in a real-world setting. High pretreatment CD8+ T-cell infiltration correlates with immunotherapy efficacy.

Improvements in Overall Survival in Older Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Are Driven By Improvements across Multiple Lines of Therapy

Introduction Survival rates for people with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) have improved in recent years. Among the potential factors accounting for this improvement is the approval of multiple new therapies over the past two decades, including bortezomib, bendamustine, ibrutinib, lenalidomide, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib. We hypothesized that the availability of multiple agents with non-overlapping mechanisms of action would result in significant improvements in overall survival following first-line therapy. Methods Patients diagnosed with MCL between 2002 and 2017 were identified using the SEER-Medicare linked database. Selected patients were &amp;gt;65 years of age at the time of diagnosis with MCL. Lines of therapy were determined using billing codes, with inpatient/outpatient claims used for traditional agents and Medicare Part D dataset used for oral agents. Next lines of therapy were defined based on claims for new anticancer agents separated from the end of the prior line by some certain number of days. Sensitivity analyses were performed varying the number of days between therapies. Overall survival (OS) was defined as initiation of initial therapy to death, while OS2 was defined as time from initiation of second-line therapy to death. Time to next therapy 1 (TTNT1) was defined as time from start of first-line therapy to death or start of second-line therapy, whichever came first. Cox models and Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves were generated for time-to-event analyses. Analyses were stratified by categories of years of first- and second-line therapies corresponding to eras of key drug approvals (e.g., 2002-2005, 2006-2009, 2010-2013, &amp;gt;2013). Results In total, 4,832 patients were included, among whom 3,840 patients (79.5%) had claims for first-line regimens and 1,648 (34.1% of total and 42.9% of patients with first-line regimens) had second-line regimens. Of the 4,832 patients, the majority were male (67.4%), White (94.6%), and non-Hispanic (94.7%), with good performance status (74.8%) and a Charlson Comorbidity Index &amp;lt;2 (64.8%). The median age at diagnosis was 75 (IQR 70-81). Patients with first- and/or second-line regimens did not differ significantly from the entire population of 4,832 patients with MCL in terms of baseline characteristics. In the first-line setting, use of bendamustine-rituximab (BR) increased from 2.3% of patients treated in 2006-2009 to 49.5% in 2014-2017. Similarly, use of single-agent BTK-inhibitors (BTKi) increased from nonexistent in patients treated in 2010-2013 to 13.8% in 2014-2017. In the second-line setting, use of single-agent BTKi similarly increased from 2.6% of those treated in 2010-2013 to 44.9% in 2014-2017. Median OS for the 3,840 patients with fist-line regimens was 4.4 years (95% CI, 4.1-4.5); median OS for those receiving first-line therapy in 2002-2005 was 3.5 years (3.1-3.9), compared to 3.7 (3.4-4.0), 4.5 (4.2-5.0), and not reached (4.8-NR) among those treated in 2006-2009, 2010-2013, and 2014-2017, respectively. Patients treated in 2014-2017 had significantly improved OS compared with those in 2002-2005 (log rank p&amp;lt;0.0001). Median TTNT1 overall was 2.5 years (2.4-2.6); median TTNT1 was 3.2 years (2.9-3.5) vs 2.3 years (2.1-2.6) for patients who received first-line therapy in 2014-2017 compared to 2002-2005 (log rank p&amp;lt;0.0001) ( Figure A). In addition, there was a significant difference across KM curves for OS2 stratified by categories of years of second-line therapy, with median OS2 of 2.5 (2.0-3.2) in patients treated in 2014-2017 compared to median OS2 of 2.1 (1.7-2.5) in 2010-2013 ( Figure B). Discussion In this analysis, we observed improvements survival of MCL patients over time, along with similar improvements in outcomes following first-line therapy, which may correlate with increased BR and BTKi use as first-line agents. Unexpectedly, improvements in survival following first-line therapy were considerably more modest. Potential explanations include lack of data from recent years during which we expect continued increased utilization of oral therapies vs unique impact of repeated therapies in the elderly. Overall, these data support the need for ongoing development of first- and subsequent-line therapies in MCL.

The Clinical Implications of Reversions in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 after Progression on Rucaparib.

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) provide an effective maintenance option for patients with BRCA- or PALB2-mutated pancreatic cancer. However, mechanisms of PARPi resistance and optimal post-PARPi therapeutic strategies are poorly characterized. We collected paired cell-free DNA samples and post-PARPi clinical data on 42 patients with advanced, platinum-sensitive pancreatic cancer who were treated with maintenance rucaparib on NCT03140670, of whom 32 developed progressive disease. Peripherally detected, acquired BRCA or PALB2 reversion variants were uncommon (5/30; 16.6%) in patients who progressed on rucaparib. Reversions were significantly associated with rapid resistance to PARPi treatment (median PFS, 3.7 vs. 12.5 months; P = 0.001) and poor overall survival (median OS, 6.2 vs. 23.0 months; P < 0.0001). All patients with reversions received rechallenge with platinum-based chemotherapy following PARPi progression and experienced faster progression on this therapy than those without reversion variants (real-world time-to-treatment discontinuation, 2.4 vs. 5.8 months; P = 0.004). Of the patients who progressed on PARPi and received further chemotherapy, the OS from initiation of second-line therapy was significantly lower in those with reversion variants than in those without (5.5 vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.002). Finally, high levels of tumor shedding were independently associated with poor outcomes in patients who received rucaparib. Acquired reversion variants were uncommon but detrimental in a population of patients with advanced BRCA- or PALB2-related pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who received maintenance rucaparib. Reversion variants led to rapid progression on PARPi, rapid failure of subsequent platinum-based treatment, and poor OS of patients. The identification of such variants in the blood may have both predictive and prognostic value. See related commentary by Tsang and Gallinger, p. 5005.

The MAGIC Algorithm Probability Predicts Long-Term Outcomes and Treatment Response to Second-Line Therapy for Acute Gvhd

Introduction: Risk stratification approaches using clinical criteria or biomarkers in acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) have traditionally been implemented at diagnosis or initiation systemic treatment with corticosteroids. For patients who require second-line treatment, the significance of biomarkers at salvage therapy and the relationship between biomarker risk and choice of therapy are unknown. Methods: We studied adult patients who received second-line treatment for acute GVHD between January 2016 and December 2021 in the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD Consortium (MAGIC) database, which collects clinical data and longitudinal serum samples from allogeneic HCT recipients using a rigorous PRoBE study design. Exclusion criteria included relapse of underlying malignant disease prior to second-line therapy, missing response data, or missing serum sample. Serum samples collected from 7 days prior to 3 days after initiation of second-line therapy met criteria for biomarker analysis. The MAGIC algorithm probability (MAP) was calculated as a single value based on concentrations of ST2 and REG3α and was stratified at a threshold of 0.290 to define high MAP and low MAP groups. The primary objective evaluated the association between MAP and survival for patients receiving second-line therapy for acute GVHD. The key secondary objective was to investigate the MAP and choice of second-line systemic agent on Day 28 overall response rate (ORR) and survival. Results: In total, 316 adult patients received second-line treatment for acute GVHD; 149 patients (47%) were excluded for disease relapse (n=27), missing response data (n=48), or missing sample (n=74).Of the 167 evaluable patients, most had steroid-refractory acute GVHD (n=146, 87%), rather than steroid-dependent (n=8, 5%) or steroid-sensitive (n=14, 8%) disease. 62 patients received ruxolitinib while 102 received other systemic agents (best available therapy: BAT). Baseline clinical characteristics of the study population according to treatment choice were similar, except for donor type (Rux: MRD 15%, MUD 74%, haplo 11%; BAT: MRD 30%, MUD 67%, haplo 3%; P=0.014) and median days from corticosteroids to second-line treatment (Rux: 18, BAT: 12; P=0.02).In total, 81 patients had high MAPs and 86 patients had low MAPs, with similar distribution in each treatment cohort (P=0.53). For the entire cohort, the median follow-up for survivors was 22 months (range, 1.5-27).The MAP separated patients into 2 groups (high vs low) with significantly different mortality (NRM at 2 years, 76% vs 29%, P&amp;lt;.0001) and survival (OS at 2 years, 12% vs 63%, P&amp;lt;.0001). Patients who received ruxolitinib as second-line therapy had lower mortality (NRM at 2 years, 35% vs 60%, P&amp;lt;.002) and improved survival (OS at 2 years, 51% vs 32%, P&amp;lt;.008), compared to those who received other systemic agents. However, the outcomes of patients with high MAP were poor, regardless of second-line treatment choice ( Figure 1A). The MAP (low vs high), time from corticosteroids to second-line treatment (≥14 days vs &amp;lt; 14 days), GVHD grade at second-line (0-2 vs 3-4), and choice of second-line therapy (Rux vs BAT) were all significant (P&amp;lt;0.05) predictors of lower NRM and higher OS in multivariate analysis. The MAP also separated patients into 2 groups with significantly different D28 ORR (low: 49%, high: 30%, P&amp;lt;.0001). In agreement with prospective trials, ruxolitinib resulted in higher D28 response rates compared to other systemic therapies (ORR 54.9% vs 30.5%, P=0.005), which was observed in both low MAP (ORR, 64.5% vs 38.5%, P=0.017) and high MAP cohorts (ORR, 42.9% vs 22.6%, P=0.06) ( Figure 1B). The MAP (low vs high), GVHD grade at second line (0-2 vs 3-4), and choice of second-line therapy (Rux vs BAT) were significant predictors (P&amp;lt;0.05) of higher D28 ORR in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The MAP measured at the initiation of second-line systemic treatment for acute GVHD predicts NRM and OS, as well as treatment response. The outcomes of patients with high MAP are poor, regardless of second-line treatment choice, and the higher CR rate in low MAP patients may drive higher survival rates. Incorporation of MAP into clinical trials in this setting warrants investigation. The results also support the current use of ruxolitinib as second-line treatment for acute GVHD, particularly in patients with low MAP.

Influence of treatment intensity and medical comorbidities in older adults with peripheral T cell lymphoma

We conducted a population-based study of patients >65 years, diagnosed 2008-2017, with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) using SEER-Medicare. Associations between PTCL subtype, treatment regimen, comorbidity, and mortality were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression. Amongst the 2,546 patients, the median age was 77 years (interquartile range, 71–83). 5-year overall survival (OS) ranged from 22.2% to 37.3% depending on PTCL subtype. The most common frontline regimen was cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP). 5-year OS rate was 47.0% for patients treated with etoposide + CHOP (N = 67; CHOEP), 33.7% for those treated with CHOP (N = 732), and 23.8% for patients treated with non-anthracycline-containing regimens (N = 105; p < 0.001). In patients without comorbidities, CHOEP remained independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.52, 95% CI,0.30-0.91). Median OS was 1.2 years from initiation of second-line therapy (N = 228) independent of treatment regimen. Frontline but not second-line treatment regimen is associated with OS in older patients with PTCL.

Metabolic control and incidence of hypoglycaemia, hospitalisation and complications among Saudi patients with type 2 diabetes initiating second-line therapy: an analysis of the Saudi Arabia data from the DISCOVER Observational Study programme

ObjectivesThe aim of the global DISCOVERing Treatment Reality of Type 2 Diabetes in Real World Settings (DISCOVER) Study was to provide a comprehensive real world assessment of the treatment pattern...

SGLT2 Inhibitors Are Associated With Reduced Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: An Analysis of Real-World Data

ObjectiveTo assess the association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and other second-line diabetes therapies with risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), as well as conduct head-to-head comparisons between SGLT2 inhibitors. Patients and MethodsUsing data from the MarketScan databases (January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2019), SGLT2 inhibitor users were matched with up to five other second-line therapy users by age, sex, date of enrollment, and date of second-line therapy initiation. The primary composite outcome included stroke, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Hazard ratios were estimated, adjusting for demographics and a propensity score reflecting comorbidities and medications. ResultsIn this study population of 313,396 patients (mean age 53±10 years; 47% female), 9787 incident CVD events occurred over a median follow-up of 1.36 years. After multivariable adjustments, SGLT2 inhibitor users had a lower risk of CVD than other second-line therapy users (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.71). Significant associations were also observed when each CVD outcome was assessed separately. No differences were noted when comparing individual SGLT2 inhibitors. ConclusionSGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a clinically meaningfully lower CVD risk in the real-world setting. In head-to-head comparisons, the different SGLT2 inhibitors were consistent in their protective associations with CVD. This suggests that as a class, SGLT2 inhibitors may have widespread benefit in preventing CVD among patients with type 2 diabetes.

Early initiation of second-line therapy in primary immune thrombocytopenia: insights from real-world evidence

To compare patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) prescribed early (within 3 months of initial ITP treatment) second-line treatment (eltrombopag, romiplostim, rituximab, immunosuppressive agents, splenectomy) with or without concomitant first-line therapy to those who received only first-line therapy. This real-world retrospective cohort study of 8268 patients with primary ITP from a large US-based database (Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record [EHR] dataset) combined electronic claims and EHR data. Outcomes included platelet count, bleeding events, and corticosteroid exposure 3 to 6 months after initial treatment. Baseline platelet counts were lower in patients receiving early second-line therapy (10‒28 × 109/L) versus those who did not (67 × 109/L). Counts improved and bleeding events decreased from baseline in all treatment groups 3 to 6 months after the start of therapy. Among the very few patients for whom follow-up treatment data were available (n = 94), corticosteroid use was reduced during the 3- to 6-month follow-up period in patients who received early second-line therapy versus those who did not (39% vs 87%, p < 0.001). Early second-line treatment was prescribed for more severe cases of ITP and appeared to be associated with improved platelet counts and bleeding outcomes 3 to 6 months after initial therapy. Early second-line therapy also appeared to reduce corticosteroid use after 3 months, although the small number of patients with follow-up data on treatment precludes any substantive conclusions. Further research is needed to determine whether early second-line therapy has an effect on the long-term course of ITP.

Cyclosporine treatment for steroid-resistant nephrosis complicated with acquired hemophilia A: a case report.

A 12-year-old girl with steroid-resistant nephrosis (SRN) was admitted complaining of pain in her right leg and an ultrasound showed a hematoma in her right calf. The coagulation profile revealed partial thromboplastin time prolongation and high titers (156 BU) of anti-factor VIII inhibitors were observed. Where half of the patients with antifactor VIII inhibitors were associated with underlying disorders, additional tests were performed that rule out secondary causes. This patient with long-standing SRN, who was on a maintenance dose of prednisone for six years, was complicated with acquired hemophilia A (AHA). In different to the last recommendations of AHA treatment, we preferred using cyclosporine; which is considered the initial second-line therapy for children with SRN. Complete remission was achieved of both disorders after a month with no recurrence of nephrosis or bleeding events. To our knowledge, nephrotic syndrome with AHA was reported in only three patients, two cases after remission and one during a relapse but no one were treated with cyclosporine. The authors encountered the first case of cyclosporine treatment for AHA in a patient with SRN. This study supports the use of cyclosporine to treat AHA, especially with nephrosis.

Age-Stratified Analysis of First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Evidence from a Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Chemoimmunotherapy improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in two phase III trials. They set the age-stratified subgroup analyses at 65 years; however, over half of the patients with lung cancer were newly diagnosed at ≥75 years in Japan. Therefore, treatment efficacy and safety in elderly patients ≥ 75 years with ES-SCLC should be evaluated through real-world Japanese evidence. Consecutive Japanese patients with untreated ES-SCLC or limited-stage SCLC unfit for chemoradiotherapy between 5 August 2019 and 28 February 2022 were evaluated. Patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy were divided into the non-elderly (<75 years) and elderly (≥75 years) groups, and efficacy, including PFS, OS, and post-progression survival (PPS) were evaluated. In total, 225 patients were treated with first-line therapy, and 155 received chemoimmunotherapy (98 non-elderly and 57 elderly patients). The median PFS and OS in non-elderly and elderly were 5.1 and 14.1 months and 5.5 and 12.0 months, respectively, without significant differences. Multivariate analyses revealed that age and dose reduction at the initiation of the first chemoimmunotherapy cycle were not correlated with PFS or OS. In addition, patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) = 0 who underwent second-line therapy had significantly longer PPS than those with ECOG-PS = 1 at second-line therapy initiation (p < 0.001). First-line chemoimmunotherapy had similar efficacy in elderly and non-elderly patients. Individual ECOG-PS maintenance during first-line chemoimmunotherapy is crucial for improving the PPS of patients proceeding to second-line therapy.

A real-world analysis of factors associated with high healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with myasthenia gravis receiving second-line treatment

Despite current treatments, patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) experience unpredictable and inadequately controlled symptoms, lending to variability in the clinical and economic burden of disease. However, limited data are available on MG healthcare costs, and specifically, no data on patients initiating second-line therapy. Using claims data from the IBM® MarketScan® database, we assessed patient characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and costs among MG patients initiating second-line therapy, and identified potential factors associated with high healthcare costs over a two-year follow-up period. We identified 1498 patients, of whom 49% and 31% received chronic steroids and non-steroidal immunosuppressants (NSISTs) as their second-line therapy, respectively. During follow-up, 49% experienced ≥1 MG exacerbation. Among all patients, mean all-cause total healthcare cost was $106,821 per patient during follow-up, with $88,040 and $18,780 attributed to medical and pharmacy costs, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, variables significantly associated with high cost included use of high-dose steroids, chronic intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg, ≥6 cycles), and 1 and ≥ 4 (but not 2–3) MG exacerbations in the first year after second-line therapy initiation. Any number of exacerbations were associated with high cost in a univariable analysis. A stratified cost analysis showed that patients with >1 exacerbation, ≥1 treatment switch, and high-dose steroid use in this first year experienced $198,487, $114,037, and $79,752 mean MG-related total healthcare spend during follow-up, respectively. These data suggest that patients receiving chronic IVIg or NSISTs for MG experience significant economic burden. Disease characteristics including exacerbation and treatment history may be an indicator of future high costs.

Outcomes from treatment of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma following failure of first-line anti-VEGF/VEGFR therapy: real-life evidence on the change of the treatment paradigm.

Recently approved agents for post-vascular endothelial growth factor/post-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF/VEGFR) inhibitors treatment of metastatic renal-cell carcinomas (mRCC), such as axitinib, nivolumab, and cabozantinib were shown to improve prognosis and substituted everolimus in this setting. We studied practice patterns, efficacy, and tolerability of these agents in a real-world series of Greek patients. We included patients with mRCC who received everolimus, axitinib, or nivolumab after progression on first-line anti-VEGF/VEGFRs therapy. Patients were stratified into three groups. Group A received nivolumab with or without cabozantinib at some point in their disease. Group B received axitinib but without nivolumab or cabozantinib. Group C received only everolimus among the four approved agents. Overall, 131 patients were included in the analysis. Everolimus and nivolumab were mainly used in the second line, while axitinib and cabozantinib were mostly used in the third and fourth lines. Median overall survival (OS) from first-line initiation was 8.7 [95% confidence interval (CI), 4-not reached], 3.6 (95% CI, 2-6), and 2.1 years (95% CI, 1.4-2.6) for Group A, B, and C, respectively (P < 0.001). Median OS from the initiation of second-line therapy was 3.5, 2.7, and 1.3 years, respectively (P < 0.001). There was no impact of first-line agent or treatment timing on survival. International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk stratification was associated with OS. Toxicities observed were within expected frequencies. Grade ≥3 events were rare. Adoption of modern standards in everyday treatment of mRCC results in prolongation of survival. Real-world datasets are the new landmarks of survival for future research.

Treatments and Outcomes for Patients at Academic Cancer Centers with Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) By Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) Scores

BACKGROUND: IPSS-R classifications are used to estimate risk of disease progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), overall survival (OS), and to guide treatment decisions for patients with MDS. Recent data show mutational profiles improve prognostic stratification of MDS. This study aims to describe the distribution of IPSS-R scores in patients with MDS and assess treatment patterns and clinical outcomes by IPSS-R scores. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study assessed real-world, patient-level data from adults diagnosed with MDS between 2010-2020 at the Huntsman Cancer Institute and Moffitt Cancer Center, both NCCN, NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Data were obtained via chart review from electronic medical records. IPSS-R scores were calculated at or within 30 days of diagnosis. Patients with an intermediate to very-high IPSS-R score (3.5-6+) comprised the higher risk (HR) cohort; those with low or very low-risk IPSS-R (0-3) comprised the lower risk (LR) cohort. Study variables were compared across cohorts. Progression-free survival (PFS), defined as physician documented disease progression, AML transformation, or death, was evaluated from initiation of medication therapy and was censored at lost to follow-up or initiation of second-line therapy. OS was also assessed from treatment initiation. Clinical outcomes, specifically PFS and OS, were assessed within the hypomethylating agent (HMA)-treated subgroup. The influence of common genetic alterations on clinical outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS: There were 369 patients included in this analysis. Distribution of IPSS-R scores was: 5% (n=18) very low, 18% (n=68) low, 26% (n=97) intermediate, 25% (n=94) high, and 25% (n=92) very high. The mean age of patients was 66 years (SD: 10.6). Males were 56% (n=208) of patients, 93% (n=342) were white, and 41% (n=141) were transfusion independent at diagnosis. Transfusion independence was more common in the LR cohort (47%, n=35) compared to the HR cohort (39%, n=106). Among NGS-tested patients, the TP53 gene was most frequently altered (30%, n=86), followed by ASXL1 (20%, n=58), TET2 (17%, n=50), and DNMT3A (15%, n=44). The HR cohort harbored more TP53 mutations (HR: n=78 [35%]; LR: n=8 [12%]) and fewer SF3B1 mutations (HR: n=11 [5%]; LR: n=14 [22%]). In the HR cohort, first-line HMAs were used to treat 81% (n=230) of patients for a median of 4 cycles, while 11% (n=32) received no MDS-directed therapy, and 7% (n=21) received other medications for treatment of MDS (e.g., clinical trial drug, hydroxyurea). In the LR cohort, HMAs were used to treat 51% (n=44) of patients for a median 5 cycles, 26% (n=22) received no MDS-directed therapy, & 23% (n=20) received other medications for treatment of MDS (e.g., clinical trial drug, hydroxyurea). Second-line treatment was received by 24% of patients (n=88) with HMAs as the most frequent therapy choice for both HR (19%, n=53) and LR (16%, n=14) patients. Lenalidomide was the second most common second-line therapy for both HR (1%, n=3) and LR (5%, n=4) patients. Stem-cell transplant (SCT) was pursued within the HR cohort both more frequently (n=157 [55%] vs. n=23 [27%]) and sooner (7.2 vs. 9.3 median months from diagnosis) compared to the LR cohort. Among HR patients treated with first-line HMA complete response (CR) was achieved by 11% (n=26) with a median duration of CR of 23.8 months that included 24 patients (92%) who received SCT. Among first-line HMA-treated patients (n=274), median PFS was shorter within the HR cohort (median 9.5 months) compared to the LR cohort (18.3 months). Similarly, among first-line HMA-treated patients (n=274) median OS was shorter for the HR cohort (18.8 months) compared to the LR cohort (25.6 months. Among HMA-treated HR patients (n=227), OS was shorter for TP53 mutated patients (median 14.3 vs. 26.8 months) compared to TP53 wildtype patients, and longer for ASXL1 mutated patients (median 51.8 vs. 16.3 months) compared to ASXL1 wildtype patients. CONCLUSIONS: In the first-line setting, HR patients have low likelihood of achieving and maintaining a complete response. Both HR and LR patients have a high likelihood of experiencing disease progression. In addition, few patients received second-line therapy. Therefore, a large unmet need exists for first and subsequent lines of therapy. Specific genetic profiles may influence treatment decisions. Future research will describe the IPSS-M classification system within the same cohort.

Influence of first-line chemotherapy regimen on survival outcomes of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who received second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors.

The therapeutic landscape for advanced urothelial carcinoma (mUC) has changed significantly since studies establishing superiority of cisplatin as first-line therapy were conducted. Most patients who are eligible now receive either maintenance or second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and data comparing first-line platinum chemotherapy agents in this setting is limited. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of first-line platinum chemotherapy agent on survival for patients who receive second-line ICI. This is a retrospective cohort study of real-world data, performed from January 1, 2015, to March 21, 2021, included patients with a diagnosis of metastatic or locally advanced urothelial carcinoma. Exposure of interest was first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy (gemcitabine and/or cisplatin or gemcitabine and/or carboplatin) followed by single-agent second-line ICI. The primary endpoint was overall survival from start of second-line therapy. 2,042 patients received either gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) or gemcitabine and carboplatin (gem/carbo) as first-line therapy. The primary analysis of 890 patients who received second-line single-agent ICI had a median follow-up was 24.2 months from initiation of second-line therapy. Important differences in baseline demographics and/or clinical factors between groups were age, performance status, incidence of upper tract disease, and cisplatin eligibility. Unadjusted overall survival (OS) calculated from start of second-line therapy was longer in patients who received gem/cis compared to gem/carbo followed by ICI (median 9.3 vs. 8.8 months, P = 0.0009). However, OS adjusted for covariates was not significantly different with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.79-1.13; P = 0.50). A separate time-varying covariate model also showed no association between OS and first-line gem/cis (HR 1.00 [95% CI, 0.84-1.19]) while receiving second-line ICI. Survival time on ICI in the second-line setting is the same regardless of choice of prior platinum agent (cisplatin vs. carboplatin) suggesting against specific synergy for one of these agents with ICI. However, a significantly greater proportion of patients in a landmark analysis had long-term benefit with cisplatin strongly supporting it is as the preferred first-line platinum agent.

Previously treated recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer in England: A real-world observational analysis

ObjectivesIn patients with recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer who have progressed after first-line treatment, there are a lack of real-world data on treatment patterns, characteristics, and survival outcomes. A novel study was conducted to determine real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in England. MethodsThis non-interventional study used routine, administrative health data from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service in England to identify patients diagnosed with recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018, inclusive. A cohort of patients who progressed to second-line treatment were identified as the ‘immune checkpoint inhibitor-eligible second-line’ cohort. The co-primary objectives were to summarise baseline demographics, disease characteristics, treatments received, and depict overall survival and time-to-next-treatment (a proxy for progression-free survival) from the start of second-line therapy using Kaplan–Meier methodology. ResultsOverall, 12,058 patients were diagnosed with recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer;999 patients were included in the immune checkpoint inhibitor-eligible second-line cohort and 77.9% (778 of 999) had advanced disease (Stage III/IV). The most common treatments received at second-line were carboplatin plus paclitaxel (27.9%), carboplatin plus liposomal doxorubicin (14.1%), liposomal doxorubicin monotherapy (13.0%), and paclitaxel monotherapy (11.6%). From initiation of second-line therapy, median (95% confidence interval) overall survival was 10.3 months (9.2–11.1), and median time-to-next-treatment was 7.7 months (7.1–8.2). ConclusionsTreatments received in the relapsed setting were variable and survival outcomes poor at second-line, highlighting the need for standard of care guidance and innovative therapies to improve patient outcomes in England and in countries with similar treatment patterns. FundingGSK.

Treatment patterns and real-world clinical outcomes in patients with advanced endometrial cancer that are non-microsatellite instability high (non-MSI-high) or mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) in the United States

ObjectiveMicrosatellite instability (MSI) due to defective DNA mismatch repair has emerged as an actionable biomarker in advanced endometrial cancer (aEC). Currently, there are no treatment patterns and outcomes data in non-MSI-high (non-MSI-H) or mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) aEC patients following prior systemic therapy (FPST). Our goal was to describe real-world data in this population in the US in 2019 and prior years. MethodsEndometrial Cancer Health Outcomes (ECHO) is a retrospective patient chart review study conducted in the US. Patients with non-MSI-H/pMMR aEC and progression between 06/01/2016–06/30/2019 FPST were eligible. Data collected included patient demographics, clinical and treatment characteristics, and clinical outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to estimate time to treatment discontinuation, real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and overall survival (OS), separately by treatment category. ResultsA total of 165 eligible patients initiated second-line therapy with chemotherapy ± bevacizumab (n = 140) or hormonal therapy (n = 25). Median age was 66.0 years at aEC diagnosis, 70.2% were Stage IIIB-IV, 40.0% had ECOG ≥ 2 at second-line therapy initiation. Median rwPFS was 5.0 months (95% CI: 4.0–6.0) for patients receiving chemotherapy ± bevacizumab and 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.0–29.0) for those receiving hormonal therapy. Median OS was 10.0 months (95% CI: 8.0–13.0) and 9.0 months (95% CI: 6.0-NA) in these groups, respectively. ConclusionsNon-MSI-H/pMMR patients who initiated second-line therapy with chemotherapy ± bevacizumab or hormonal therapy had poor clinical outcomes with a median survival less than 1 year and rwPFS less than 6 months. This was the first study to define the clinical unmet need in patients with non-MSI-H/pMMR aEC with conventional therapy.

Cost-effectiveness of CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy versus autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in first relapse.

7537 Background: The recently reported ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM trials demonstrate superior event-free survival among patients with primary refractory or early relapsed DLBCL compared to salvage chemotherapy with ASCT. However, given a cost of &gt;$370,000, it is not known whether second-line CAR-T is cost-effective compared to ASCT. Thus, we developed a state-transition microsimulation model to simulate clinical outcomes and costs associated with therapy for DLBCL patients in first relapse, using ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM data. Methods: The model begins at initiation of second-line therapy comparing salvage chemotherapy with ASCT or CAR-T therapy. We examined a three-year time horizon, including crossover to the alternative strategy therapy in the third line, as well as subsequent lines of therapy, using open-source Amua 0.3.0 software. Base case analysis was performed using 1000 first-order Monte Carlo simulations and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was performed with 1000 simulations to test model uncertainty. Conditional probabilities of survival and disease progression were extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves from pivotal clinical trials using the WebPlotDigitizer tool. Costs were estimated from public sources in US Dollars ($) and effects were estimated in quality-adjusted life years (QALY) using published utility values. Results: Median overall survival was 15 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 13-19 months) with ASCT and 21 months (95% CI 17-29 months) with CAR-T. The PSA demonstrated costs and effectiveness per patient of $243,581 and 1.06 QALYs with ASCT and $470,150 and 1.22 QALYs with CAR-T with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $1,383,320/QALY. Incremental net monetary benefit of CAR-T versus ASCT, based on a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $200,000/QALY, was -$193,812. The break-even price for CAR-T and all subsequent therapies, based on a one-way sensitivity analysis, was $170,489. Conclusions: The model demonstrated improved survival and QALYs for the second-line CAR-T therapy, but was not cost-effective, as the ICER exceeded $1,000,000/QALY, which is higher than most accepted WTP thresholds. A limitation of these early data is that they only assess outcomes over three years. To estimate the full effect of these therapies, we will extrapolate the Kaplan-Meier curves for additional analyses. Clinical outcomes of second-line CAR-T are promising, but prices would need to be considerably lower to enable equitable access and affordability.[Table: see text]