Initial Monthly Doses Research Articles

Dual pathway inhibition with faricimab for previously treated neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema: guidance from a UK panel of retina specialists.

Some eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and centre-involving diabetic macular oedema (DMO) fail to respond sufficiently or lose response over time to standard of care intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. This paper explores clinical scenarios for switching to dual action angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2)/VEGF-A inhibitor faricimab (Vabysmo, Roche Products Limited) in previously anti-VEGF-treated patients. A national steering group meeting of UK retina specialists was held in London on 27 October 2023. Clinician practice and experience were reviewed together with pivotal clinical trial data and early findings from real-world settings. Roche Products Limited facilitated and funded the meeting. While there is no standardised protocol for identifying suboptimal response, the authors review relevant clinical biomarkers of disease activity used in routine clinical practice to determine patient response and guide treatment decisions. Common reasons identified for considering a change of treatment were lack of efficacy demonstrated by suboptimal anatomic or visual improvement and insufficient durability of response. The panel outline strategies for switching to faricimab among eligible patients with a prior anti-VEGF treatment history, with initial monthly loading doses or maintaining the previous treatment interval before attempting to extend, that may be integrated into current treat-and-extend (T&E) clinical pathways for treating patients with nAMD and DMO. General considerations for switching between treatments are also reviewed. Clinicians may consider a treatment switch to faricimab in nAMD and DMO patients who have suboptimal disease control or insufficient durability of response on initial anti-VEGF therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Efdamrofusp Alfa versus Aflibercept in Participants with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized, Double-Masked, Active-Controlled, Noninferiority, Phase II Trial

PurposeTo evaluate efficacy and safety of efdamrofusp alfa compared with aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DesignRandomized, double-masked, multicenter, active-controlled, non-inferiority phase 2 study ParticipantsA total of 231 treatment-naïve and previously treated participants with active choroidal neovascularization secondary to nAMD were enrolled. MethodsEligible participants were randomized (1:1:1) to 2 mg efdamrofusp alfa, 4 mg efdamrofusp alfa or 2 mg aflibercept groups. Participants in all groups received three initial monthly loading doses, followed by treatment every 8 weeks with assessment every 4 weeks up to week 52. Main outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was the mean BCVA change from baseline to week 36. The pre-specified noninferiority margin was set as –5 letters (80% CI). ResultsEach treatment group included 77 participants. The mean BCVA changes from baseline to week 36 for 2 mg efdamrofusp alfa, 4 mg efdamrofusp alfa and aflibercept groups were +10.6, +11.4, +12.0 letters, respectively; Least Squares (LS) mean difference were –1.4 (80% CI: –3.5 to 0.7) between 2 mg efdamrofusp alfa and aflibercept, and –0.6 (80% CI: –2.7 to 1.6) between 4 mg efdamrofusp alfa and aflibercept. Mean central retinal thickness changes were consistent across groups. Adverse event rate was comparable among the groups. ConclusionsEfdamrofusp alfa demonstrated noninferiority to aflibercept in BCVA improvement, accompanied by a similar safety profile.

Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (PULSAR): 48-week results from a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial

Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg could improve treatment outcomes and provide sustained disease control in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), with extended dosing compared with aflibercept 2 mg. PULSAR is a phase 3, randomised, three-group, double-masked, non-inferiority, 96-week trial conducted across 223 sites worldwide. Adults with nAMD were randomised 1:1:1 to aflibercept 8 mg every 12 weeks (8q12), aflibercept 8 mg every 16 weeks (8q16), or aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks (2q8), following three initial monthly doses in all groups. From week 16, patients in the aflibercept 8 mg groups had their dosing interval shortened if pre-specified dose regimen modification criteria denoting disease activity were met. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 48. All patients with at least one dose of study treatment were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04423718) and is ongoing. Of 1011 patients randomised to aflibercept 8q12 (n=336), 8q16 (n=338), or 2q8 (n=337) between Aug 11, 2020, and July 30, 2021, 1009 patients received study treatment (aflibercept 8q12 n=335; aflibercept 8q16 n=338; and aflibercept 2q8 n=336). Aflibercept 8q12 and 8q16 showed non-inferior BCVA gains versus aflibercept 2q8 (mean BCVA change from baseline +6·7 [SD 12·6] and +6·2 [11·7] vs +7·6 [12·2] letters). The least squares mean differences between aflibercept 8q12 versus 2q8 and 8q16 versus 2q8, respectively, were -0·97 (95% CI -2·87 to 0·92) and -1·14 (-2·97 to 0·69) letters (non-inferiority margin at 4 letters). The incidence of ocular adverse events in the study eye was similar across groups (aflibercept 8q12 n=129 [39%]; aflibercept 8q16 n=127 [38%]; and aflibercept 2q8 n=130 [39%]). Aflibercept 8 mg showed efficacy and safety with extended dosing intervals, which has the potential to improve the management of patients with nAMD. Bayer AG and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Intravitreal aflibercept for the treatment of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration in routine clinical practice in Latin America: the AQUILA study

BackgroundAQUILA (NCT03470103) was a prospective, observational, 12-month cohort study evaluating treatment patterns, clinical effectiveness, and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in patients from Latin America with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).MethodsTreatment-naïve and previously treated (switching to IVT-AFL) patients (aged ≥ 55 years) were enrolled from March 2018, with a primary completion date of September 2020, from Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica, and Mexico. Patients received IVT-AFL in a routine clinical practice setting.ResultsOf 274 patients in the full analysis set, 201 were treatment-naïve and 73 had received previous treatment. The mean ± standard deviation number of IVT-AFL injections received by month 12 was 4.2 ± 1.9 (treatment-naïve) and 5.2 ± 2.7 (previously treated). The median duration from diagnosis to IVT-AFL treatment was 1.2 months (treatment-naïve) and 19.5 months (previously treated). Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) improved from baseline to month 12 by + 5.2 ± 18.3 (treatment-naïve; baseline: 48.2 ± 23.5) and + 3.1 ± 15.3 letters (previously treated; baseline: 47.7 ± 21.4).ConclusionAQUILA is the first study to assess the use of IVT-AFL in routine clinical practice in Latin America. Mean BCVA and other visual acuity outcomes improved in both treatment groups, despite many patients not receiving the IVT-AFL label-recommended regimen of three initial monthly doses, or seven or more injections in 12 months. Patients who did receive the label-recommended number of injections had numerically greater improvements in visual acuity outcomes. Patients with nAMD treated regularly and more frequently with IVT-AFL, therefore, have the potential to achieve outcomes consistent with those observed in interventional studies.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03470103. Registered February 5, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03470103

Intravitreal aflibercept for the treatment of patients with diabetic macular edema in routine clinical practice in Latin America: the AQUILA study

BackgroundAQUILA (NCT03470103) was a prospective, observational, 12-month cohort study to understand treatment patterns and to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in patients from Latin America with diabetic macular edema (DME).MethodsTreatment-naïve and previously treated (switching to IVT-AFL) patients (aged ≥ 18 years) were enrolled from March 2018, with a primary completion date of September 2020, from Argentina, Colombia, Costa Rica and Mexico. Patients received IVT-AFL in a routine clinical practice setting.ResultsOf 258 patients in the full analysis set, 181 were treatment-naïve and 77 had received previous treatment. The mean ± standard deviation number of IVT-AFL injections by Month 12 was 3.7 ± 1.8 (treatment-naïve) and 4.0 ± 2.2 (previously treated). The median duration from diagnosis to IVT-AFL treatment was 1.8 months (treatment-naïve) and 16.0 months (previously treated). Mean best-corrected visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) improved from baseline to Month 12 by + 8.1 ± 17.7 (treatment-naïve; baseline: 54.5 ± 19.4) and + 4.6 ± 15.4 letters (previously treated; baseline: 52.9 ± 18.6).ConclusionAQUILA is the first study to assess the use of IVT-AFL in routine clinical practice in Latin America. Despite few patients being treated with the label-recommended regimen of 5 initial monthly doses or receiving ≥ 8 injections in 12 months, functional and anatomic visual outcomes improved during 12 months of treatment with IVT-AFL. Patients receiving the label-recommended number of injections had numerically greater improvements in visual acuity outcomes. Patients with DME treated regularly and more frequently with IVT-AFL therefore have the potential to achieve outcomes consistent with those observed in interventional studies.Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03470103. Registered February 5, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03470103

Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Requiring Intensive Intravitreal Aflibercept Treatment: An ARIES Post Hoc Analysis.

IntroductionThe aim of this post hoc analysis of the ARIES study is to explore the requirement for intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment intervals of < 8 weeks (w) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), and to assess vision and anatomic outcomes in such patients who require more intensive treatment.MethodsARIES was a multicenter, randomized, phase 3b/4 study that investigated the efficacy of two IVT-AFL proactive, individualized, treat-and-extend regimens over 2 years in treatment-naïve patients with nAMD. Patients were determined as injection-intensive if the study investigator identified that a treatment interval of < 8 w was needed and if they had ≥ 1 interval of < 8 w after three initial monthly doses. Treatment intervals could be extended subsequently if extension criteria were met. This is a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in ARIES and statistical analysis is descriptive.ResultsOf 269 patients in the combined treatment arms, 23.0% (n = 62) were injection-intensive (Year 1: 13.8% [n = 37]; Year 2: 9.3% [n = 25]). Time from IVT-AFL initiation to injection-intensive determination varied (range, 16–100 w; median: 43.2 w). Mean treatment interval was 8.4 w before and 6.1 w after injection-intensive determination. Overall, 59.7% achieved treatment intervals of ≥ 8 w following injection-intensive determination. Vision improvements from baseline to Week 104 were smaller for injection-intensive patients than non–injection-intensive patients (mean [SD] best-corrected visual acuity change: + 2.3 [15.6] vs. + 5.9 [12.3] letters). Anatomic outcomes were similar between injection-intensive and non–injection-intensive patients (central retinal thickness change from baseline to Week 104: − 160 [154] vs. − 167 [136] µm).ConclusionsIn ARIES, 23% of treatment-naïve patients with nAMD experienced at least one treatment interval of < 8 w. Injection-intensive patients showed improved vision and anatomic outcomes. For most, treatment intervals could be extended to ≥ 8 w following injection-intensive determination. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02581891.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00541-8.

Correlation of Change in Macular Thickness With Change in Visual Acuity in Diabetic Macular Edema: Post Hoc Analysis of VISTA and VIVID Trials.

Purpose: To assess the correlation between the change in central subfield thickness (CST) and change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with fixed-dosing intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI). Methods: This post hoc analysis of the VISTA and VIVID randomized controlled clinical trials, in which 862 eyes with central-involved DME were randomly assigned to IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (2q4; 290 eyes), IAI 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly doses (2q8; 286 eyes), or macular laser (286 eyes) and followed through 100 weeks. Correlations between the change in CST and change in BCVA from baseline to weeks 12, 52, and 100 were assessed using the Pearson correlation. Results: The respective correlations (r [95% CI]) at weeks 12, 52, and 100 were -0.39 (-0.49 to -0.29), -0.27 (-0.38 to -0.15), and -0.30 (-0.41 to -0.17) in the 2q4 arm and -0.28 (-0.39 to -0.17), -0.29 (-0.41 to -0.17), and -0.33 (-0.44 to -0.20) in the 2q8 arm. Linear regression analysis of the correlation at week 100, adjusted for relevant baseline factors, showed CST changes accounted for 17% of the variance in BCVA changes; every 100-µm decrease in CST was associated with a 1.2-letter increase in BCVA (P = .001). Conclusions: Correlations between the change in CST and change in BCVA after 2q4 or 2q8 fixed-dosing IAI for DME were modest. Although a change in CST might be important in determining the need for antivascular endothelial growth factor for DME at follow-up, it was not a good surrogate for VA outcomes.

Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Events in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema: Post Hoc Analysis of VISTA and VIVID Trials.

This work aimed to assess the incidence of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) events and improvement to mild non-PDR (NPDR) or better after intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) or laser treatment (control) in diabetic macular edema (DME). PDR events in the VISTA (NCT01363440) and VIVID (NCT01331681) phase 3 clinical trials were evaluated in a combined IAI-treated group (IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks or 2 mg every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly doses; n = 475) and a macular laser control group (n = 235) through week 100 in eyes without PDR at baseline (Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale [DRSS] score ≤ 53). Improvement in the DRSS score to 35 or better was evaluated in those with a baseline DRSS score of 43 or greater. A lower proportion of eyes in the IAI group than in the laser group developed a PDR event through week 100 (4.4% vs 11.1%; adjusted difference, -6.7%; 97.5% CI, -11.7 to -1.6; nominal P = .0008). All PDR events occurred in eyes with a baseline DRSS score of 43, 47, or 53 and not in those with a score of 35 or less. A greater proportion of eyes in the IAI group than in the control group achieved a DRSS score of 35 or less (20.0% vs 3.8%; nominal P < .0001). Fewer eyes with NPDR and DME treated with IAI than eyes treated with a laser had a PDR event. More eyes treated with IAI improved to mild NPDR or better (DRSS score ≤ 35) through 100 weeks.

PERSEUS-IT 24-month analysis: a prospective observational study to assess the effectiveness of intravitreal aflibercept in routine clinical practice in Italy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PurposePERSEUS-IT (NCT02289924) was a prospective, observational, 2-year study evaluating the effectiveness and treatment patterns of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in routine clinical practice in Italy.MethodsTreatment-naïve patients with nAMD receiving IVT-AFL per routine clinical practice were enrolled. The primary endpoint was mean change in visual acuity (VA; decimals) from baseline to month (M) 12 and M24. Outcomes were evaluated for the overall study population and independently for the 2 treatment cohorts: regular (3 initial monthly doses, ≥ 7 injections by M12, and ≥ 4 injections between M12 and M24) and irregular (any other pattern).ResultsOf 813 patients enrolled, 709 were included in the full analysis set (FAS); VA assessments were available for 342 patients at M12 (FAS1Y, 140 regular and 202 irregular) and 233 patients at M24 (FAS2Y, 37 regular and 196 irregular). In the overall FAS, the mean ± SD change in VA from baseline to M12 and M24 was + 0.09 ± 0.24 and + 0.02 ± 0.25 decimals, and there was a statistically significant difference between the regular and irregular cohorts in both FAS1Y (p = 0.0034) and FAS2Y (p = 0.0222). Ocular treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 4.1% (n = 33/810 [safety set]) of patients.ConclusionIn PERSEUS-IT, clinically relevant functional and anatomic improvements were observed within the first 12 months of IVT-AFL treatment in routine clinical practice in Italy in patients with treatment-naïve nAMD. These gains were generally maintained across the 2-year study. The safety profile of IVT-AFL was consistent with prior studies.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02289924.Date of registrationNovember 13, 2014.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept Treat-and-Extend Regimens in the ALTAIR Study: 96-Week Outcomes in the Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Subgroup.

IntroductionTo explore the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) proactive, individualized treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens in exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the subgroup of patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) enrolled in the ALTAIR study.MethodsThis was a PCV subgroup analysis of ALTAIR, a 96-week, randomized, open-label, phase 4 study in treatment-naïve patients with exudative AMD in Japan. Following three initial monthly doses, patients received IVT-AFL at week 16 and were randomized 1:1 to T&E regimens with either 2-week (IVT-AFL-2W) or 4-week (IVT-AFL-4W) adjustments. The primary endpoint of ALTAIR was the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 52. Endpoints were assessed at weeks 52 and 96. Safety analyses were conducted.ResultsA total of 90 patients with PCV were included within the full analysis set. From baseline to week 52, mean [standard deviation (SD)] change in BCVA was + 7.5 (14.7) letters and + 8.2 (11.6) letters in the IVT-AFL-2W and IVT-AFL-4W groups, respectively. From baseline to week 96, 91.3% and 90.9% of patients maintained vision in the IVT-AFL-2W and IVT-AFL-4W groups, respectively. From baseline to week 52, mean (SD) change in central retinal thickness was − 153 (177) µm and −112 (122) µm in the IVT-AFL-2W and IVT-AFL-4W groups, respectively. Overall, 51.1% of patients (IVT-AFL-2W, 43.5%; IVT-AFL-4W, 59.1%) achieved a treatment interval of 16 weeks between weeks 16 and 96. The safety profile of IVT-AFL was consistent with previous studies.ConclusionIn treatment-naïve patients with PCV, IVT-AFL administered using two different T&E regimens improved and maintained functional and anatomic outcomes over 96 weeks while minimizing treatment burden.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02305238.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02162-w.

Efficacy Outcomes of Brolucizumab Versus Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients with Early Residual Fluid

To compare the outcomes of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration with early residual fluid in the HAWK and HARRIER studies. Post hoc analysis using pooled data from the phase 3 studies HAWK (NCT02307682) and HARRIER (NCT02434328). The early residual fluid cohort for this post hoc analysis consisted of patients treated with either brolucizumab 6 mg (n= 730 patients) or aflibercept 2 mg (n= 729 patients) and who had the presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), or both verified by spectral-domain OCT at the week 12 clinic visit. After 3 initial monthly doses, patients treated with brolucizumab received injections every 12 weeks (q12w) or every 8 weeks (q8w), depending on the neovascular age-related macular degeneration disease activity, whereas patients treated with aflibercept received fixed q8w dosing. The mean change in best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness (CST) from the baseline to that at weeks 48 and 96, the proportion of patients treated with brolucizumab remaining on q12w dosing to week 96, and the change in fluid status at weeks 48 and96. All analyses were based on 149 of 730 (20.4%) patients treated with brolucizumab and 217 of 729 (29.8%) patients treated with aflibercept with spectral-domain OCT-verified IRF, SRF, or both at their week 12 visit. The best-corrected visual acuity improvements from baseline at weeks 48 and 96 were numerically better for brolucizumab than for aflibercept (least square mean [standard error] 7.9 ± 1.1 vs. 4.6 ± 0.9 and 7.4 ± 1.3 vs.2.9± 1.1 letters, respectively). The CST reductions from baseline at weeks 48 and 96 were consistently greater with brolucizumab than with aflibercept (least square mean [standard error], μm:-194.9 ± 13.7 vs.-123.9 ± 11.3; and-201.1 ± 14.5 vs.-134.2 ± 12.0, respectively). At weeks 48 and 96, patients treated with brolucizumab had a 40.4% and 31.3% probability of remaining on q12w dosing intervals, respectively. Fewer patients treated with brolucizumab had remaining IRF, SRF, or both at weeks 48 and 96 than patients treated with aflibercept (59.1% vs. 75.1% and 49.0% vs. 60.4%, respectively). In patients with early residual fluid, defined as spectral-domain OCT-verified IRF, SRF, or both at the week 12 clinic visit, brolucizumab resolved the early residual fluid and reduced CST more effectively than aflibercept, resulting in greater best-corrected visual acuity improvements through week 96 of anti-VEGF treatment.

Evaluation of Intravitreal Aflibercept for the Treatment of Severe Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Proactive treatment of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) reduces the risk of progression to vision-threatening complications. To evaluate vascular endothelial growth factor blockade therapy with intravitreal aflibercept injections in eyes with severe NPDR without diabetic macular edema (DME). The Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Aflibercept for the Improvement of Moderately Severe to Severe Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PANORAMA) was a double-masked 100-week randomized clinical trial conducted in multiple centers worldwide. The study included 402 adults with Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) level 47 or 53 with no DME and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Intravitreal injections of aflibercept, 2 mg, every 16 weeks after 3 initial monthly doses and one 8-week interval (aflibercept 2q16 group); intravitreal injections of aflibercept, 2 mg, every 8 weeks after 5 initial monthly doses, with pro re nata (PRN) dosing beginning at week 56 (aflibercept 2q8/PRN group); or sham injections (control group). Proportions of eyes with a 2-step or greater improvement in DRSS level, vision-threatening complications, and center-involved DME from baseline to weeks 24, 52, and 100. Among 402 participants (1 eye per participant), the mean (SD) age was 55.7 (10.5) years; 225 (56.0%) were male, and 310 (77.1%) were White. A total of 135 were randomized to the aflibercept 2q16 group, 134 to the aflibercept 2q8/PRN group, and 133 to the control group. At 24 weeks, treatment with aflibercept resulted in a 2-step or greater improvement in DRSS level in 157 of 269 eyes (58.4%) in the combined aflibercept groups vs 8 of 133 eyes (6.0%) in the control group (adjusted difference, 52.3%; 95% CI, 45.2%-59.5%; P < .001). At 52 weeks, 88 of 135 eyes (65.2%) in the aflibercept 2q16 group (adjusted difference, 50.1%; 95% CI, 40.1%-60.1%) and 107 of 134 eyes (79.9%) in the aflibercept 2q8/PRN group (adjusted difference, 64.8%; 95% CI, 55.8%-73.9%) compared with 20 of 133 eyes (15.0%) in the control group (P < .001 for both comparisons) showed a 2-step or greater improvement in DRSS level. Fewer eyes treated with aflibercept vs sham injections developed vision-threatening complications and/or center-involved DME through week 100 (22 of 135 eyes [16.3%] in the 2q16 group [adjusted difference, -34.2%; 95% CI, -44.6 to -23.8] and 25 of 134 eyes [18.7%] in the 2q8/PRN group [adjusted difference, -31.7%; 95% CI, -42.5 to -20.9] compared with 67 of 133 eyes [50.4%] in the control group; P < .001 for both comparisons). No new safety signals were identified. In this study, significantly more eyes with moderately severe to severe NPDR that were treated with aflibercept showed a 2-step or greater improvement in DRSS level at 24, 52, and 100 weeks, and significantly fewer eyes treated with aflibercept vs sham developed vision-threatening complications and center-involved DME. Outcomes on the DRSS between year 1 and 2 emphasize the need for ongoing vascular endothelial growth factor suppression and adherence. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02718326.

Real-World Outcomes of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Large-Scale Postmarketing Surveillance in Korea.

PurposeTo investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in Asian patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a real-world clinical setting.Patients and MethodsIn this analysis of a prospective, regulatory, postmarketing surveillance study for IVT-AFL, 3115 patients with nAMD were included and followed for 8 months. The mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were analyzed using last observation carried forward method. A post hoc subgroup analysis and a multivariate logistic regression analysis were also performed to assess factors related to treatment outcomes.ResultsMean BCVA improved from 0.62 to 0.51 logarithm of minimum angle resolution and mean CRT decreased from 383.3 to 289.7 μm, with a mean of 3.4 injections during the 8-month follow-up. In the subgroup analysis, patients who had received 3 initial monthly doses had significantly better anatomical improvements than those treated as needed. Patients with confirmed polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) had significantly better anatomical improvements and better visual recovery than those with other types of nAMD. The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that age, injection number, PCV, and baseline BCVA were significantly associated with higher odds of gaining 3 lines at 8 months, and sex, injection number, PCV, and baseline CRT were associated with CRT ≤250 µm at 8 months. No new safety findings were identified.ConclusionIVT-AFL was effective and well tolerated in a real-world setting with a large number of Asian patients with nAMD. Number of injections and PCV were important determinants for improved treatment outcomes.

Correlation between improvement in visual acuity and QOL after Ranibizumab treatment for age-related macular degeneration patients: QUATRO study

BackgroundTo evaluate the correlation between visual acuity improvement and vision-related QOL after ranibizumab treatment in Japanese patients with AMD.MethodsIn this one-year prospective, interventional, open-label, multicenter study involving four sites, patients with neovascular AMD were enrolled and observed for 12 months. Treatment-naïve patients received 0.5 mg ranibizumab as needed after three initial monthly doses. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at every visit. Evaluations with the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) and patient satisfaction questionnaire were performed at baseline and 3 and 12 months after initial treatment. The primary endpoint was change in BCVA and QOL 3 months after ranibizumab treatment. QOL outcomes were also assessed in the better and poor BVCA subgroups.ResultsThe study enrolled 100 patients. The mean logMAR BCVA after treatment improved significantly from 0.43 to 0.30 at 3 months (p< 0.0001), and 0.28 at 12 months (p< 0.0001). The mean NEI-VFQ-25 composite scores improved from 79.48 to 84.13 at 3 months (p< 0.0001), and 86.0 at 12 months (p< 0.0001). The 3 and 12-month changes in NEI-VFQ-25 score and BCVA showed significant correlation. In the poor baseline visual acuity group (decimal BCVA ≤0.5), there was a significant correlation between the changes in the NEI-VFQ-25 score and BCVA (p=0.02) but not in the better baseline visual acuity group (decimal BCVA > 0.6, p=0.1) at 3 months. There were no significant differences in the satisfaction questionnaire score from baseline to at 3 months (p=0.54) and 12 months (p=0.23). The average CMT improved significantly from 340 to 264 μm at 3 months (p< 0.0001) and to 268 μm at 12 months (p< 0.0001).ConclusionsIntravitreal ranibizumab treatment resulted in improvement in visual acuity, anatomical change, and visual function change in Japanese AMD patients. Significant improvement was seen in patient visual function, and this was correlated with changes in VA, except immediately after loading dose treatment in patients with higher baseline VA. The patients’ satisfaction with the treatment remained unchanged during the study period.Trial registrationThis study is registered at UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000012013). Registered October 10, 2013, as prospective study.

Cost-effectiveness of intravitreal conbercept versus other treatments for wet age-related macular degeneration.

BackgroundThe potential benefits of conbercept, aflibercept, and ranibizumab has been reported in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD). However, their economic outcomes are still unclear. The current study would assess the cost-effectiveness of conbercept, aflibercept and ranibizumab for patients with wAMD in a Chinese healthcare setting.MethodsA Markov model was constructed based on patient visual acuity. Five regimens were considered: usual care without active anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment, IVT-AFL (intravitreal aflibercept on a two-monthly basis following three initial monthly doses), RBZ q4 (ranibizumab monthly dosing), RBZ RPN (ranibizumab dose as needed) and IVT-CON (intravitreal conbercept on a three-monthly basis after three initial monthly doses). Clinical, cost, and utility data were collected from published literature.ResultsIn comparison with usual care, the IVT-AFL, RBZ q4, RBZ PRN, and IVT-CON strategies provided an additional 0.235, 0.338, 0.228, and 0.324 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively. They had marginal costs of $6,800, $10,084, $4,640, and $6,173, respectively. The strategies also produced incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of $28,892, $29,857, $20,338 and $19,028/QALY, respectively. One-way sensitivity analysis showed utility of blindness (best-corrected visual acuity <35) to have the greatest sensitivity of all the parameters. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) indicated that IVT-CON yielded the greatest probabilities of cost-effectiveness (about 92%) compared with other strategies.ConclusionsConbercept is a cost-effective option for the treatment of wAMD in a Chinese healthcare setting.

Outcomes by Baseline Choroidal Neovascularization Features in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Post Hoc Analysis of the VIEW Studies

To assess the influence of baseline choroidal neovascularization (CNV) features on visual change and fluid resolution after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Post hoc analysis of 52-week data from the phase 3 Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor VEGF Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Studies (VIEW) 1 and 2 clinical trials. One thousand eight hundred four patients with nAMD. Integrated data from VIEW 1 and 2 of 1804 eyes receiving intravitreal aflibercept injections (IAIs) 2 mg every 4 weeks, IAIs 2 mg every 8 weeks after 3 initial monthly doses, and ranibizumab every 4 weeks with documented baseline CNV type, total area, and leakage area were analyzed. Time to an event and cumulative incidence were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and relative risks were estimated using proportional hazards analysis. Cumulative incidence of time to first sustained vision gain of 15 or more Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, vision loss of more than 5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters from baseline, as well as first sustained absence of retinal fluid and intraretinal fluid as evaluated by OCT with respect to CNV type, total CNV, and leakage area. Eyes with predominantly classic CNV (mean best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA], 48.2 letters at baseline) showed a higher incidence rate of first sustained gain of 15 letters or more than eyes with occult CNV (mean BCVA, 57.9 letters at baseline; P < 0.01). Eyes with occult CNV at baseline showed higher incidence rates of first sustained absence of retinal fluid and of intraretinal fluid than eyes with predominantly classic CNV (both P < 0.01). With increasing baseline CNV total area and leakage area, the incidence rate of first sustained gain of 15 letters or more decreased. This post hoc analysis provided additional evidence for the role of baseline CNV features (CNV type, total area, and leakage area) in influencing visual and anatomic outcomes in eyes with nAMD after anti-VEGF treatment.

Macular atrophy after aflibercept therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: outcomes of Japanese multicenter study.

To evaluate the development and rate of growth in macular atrophy after intravitreal injections of aflibercept (IVAs) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) over a 2-year period. Retrospective, interventional, consecutive case series. This study included 94 eyes of 92 patients with treatment-naïve AMD involving the foveal center treated with IVAs at 3 university hospitals in Japan. The patients underwent IVAs bimonthly after 3 initial monthly doses in the first year. The protocol was converted to a treat-and-extend regimen in the second year. The incidence and growth rate of macular atrophy were quantified based on hypoautofluorescence detected by fundus autofluorescence images. Additionally, possible background factors related to the development and rate of growth of macular atrophy were investigated. Of 94 eyes, 39 (41.5%) had typical AMD and 55 (58.5%) had polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Ten eyes (10.6%) had macular atrophy at the baseline. Of the remaining 84 eyes, 14 (16.7%) had developed new macular atrophy at 2years, the square root of the growth rate of atrophy was 0.52mm/year. In multivariate analyses, a poorer best-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.01) and the presence of intraretinal fluid (P = 0.04) at baseline were found to be the independent predictors for the development of macular atrophy. No factors were found that were significantly related to the growth rate of the macular atrophy. Our study determined the incidence and rate of growth of macular atrophy after IVAs for neovascular AMD in clinical settings. Eyes with vision reduction and intraretinal fluid at the baseline develop macular atrophy more frequently after IVAs for neovascular AMD.

&lt;p&gt;Intravitreal Aflibercept versus Laser Photocoagulation in Asian Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema: The VIVID-East Study&lt;/p&gt;

PurposeThe prevalence of diabetes and diabetes-related complications, including diabetic macular edema (DME), is increasing in Asia and worldwide.MethodsVIVID-East was a 12-month, double-masked, randomized, active-controlled, Phase 3 trial (NCT01783886) enrolling adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with DME at 25 centers across China, Hong Kong, Republic of Korea, and Russia. Eyes were randomized 1:1:1 to 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) every 4 weeks (2q4; N=127), 2 mg IVT-AFL every 8 weeks (after 5 initial monthly doses from baseline to week 16) with sham injections on nontreatment visits (2q8; N=127), or macular laser photocoagulation at baseline and sham injections at every visit (laser control group; N=124). The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 52.ResultsCompared with baseline, at week 52 the mean (SE) BCVA in the 2q4 and 2q8 groups gained +13.6 (0.9) and +13.1 (1.0) letters, respectively, versus −0.5 (1.4) letters in the laser group (P<0.0001 for both). A significantly higher proportion of patients treated with IVT-AFL (2q4 and 2q8) achieved a ≥10-letter or ≥15-letter gain compared with laser (both P<0.0001) (≥10-letter gain: 70.9%, 62.7%, and 23.4%, respectively; ≥15-letter gain: 43.3%, 36.5%, and 12.1%, respectively). Mean reduction in central retinal thickness from baseline to week 52 was significantly greater with IVT-AFL versus laser treatment. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was low and similar across groups; conjunctival hemorrhage (11.8%), retinal hemorrhage (8.7%), retinal aneurysm (7.5%), and retinal exudates (5.5%) being the most frequently reported. Visual and anatomic outcomes in the Chinese subgroup were consistent with the overall population.ConclusionIVT-AFL treatment resulted in significant visual and anatomic improvements in Asian patients with DME. Treatment benefits observed in the overall study population were mirrored in the subgroup of Chinese patients, who made up the largest population group in the study.Study RegistrationNCT01783886.

PDG18 COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF INTRAVITREAL AFLIBERCEPT IN TREATING NAMD IN CHINA

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks after 3 initial monthly doses (IVT-AFL 3+Q8) versus Ranibizumab 0.5 mg monthly (RAN Q4) and pro re nata after 3 initial monthly doses (RAN 3+PRN) in the treatment of patients with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD) from a Chinese payer’s perspective, so as to provide evidence to support rational drug use in clinical practice in China. A Markov model was developed to simulate the progression of the disease in terms of visual acuity. The model included health status of “no visual impairment”, “mild visual impairment”, “moderate visual impairment”, “severe vision loss”, “blindness”, and “death”. Transition probabilities and utility scores were derived from published literature. Cost data were collected from medical institutions and physician surveys. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 5.0% per year. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. For the lifetime horizon, the costs of IVT-AFL 3+Q8, RAN Q4 and RAN 3+PRN were 129,676.18 CNY, 164,903.36 CNY and 135,912.20 CNY respectively. The corresponding quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were 6.162 QALYs, 6.162 QALYs and 6.156 QALYs. IVT-AFL 3+Q8 was dominant vs. RAN Q4 vs. RAN 3+PRN groups since it was cost saving (same outcome 6.162 QALYs with less costs). Sensitivity analyses showed that this result was robust. IVT-AFL 3+Q8 was similarly or more effective in terms of QALYs and less costly compared with RAN Q4 and RAN 3+PRN for nAMD patients in China.

Translating evidence into practice: recommendations by a UK expert panel on the use of aflibercept in diabetic macular oedema

ObjectivesThis paper describes recommendations from a panel of UK retina experts on aflibercept in diabetic macular oedema (DMO).MethodsA roundtable meeting was held in London, UK in March 2018. The meeting was sponsored by Bayer.ResultsRecommendations are based on clinical experience and level 1 evidence. Clinical experience supports the evidence base, reinforcing that aflibercept should be initiated with intensive proactive dosing at 2 mg every 4 weeks. Most panel members use six initial 4-weekly doses as in Protocol T, rather than five initial monthly doses as recommended in the Summary of product characteristics (SmPC). After intensive proactive dosing, patients with a good response (meet Protocol T ‘improvement’ criteria ≥5-letter improvement in visual acuity [VA] and/or ≥10% improvement in central subfield thickness [CST] from baseline) but who are not yet stable should continue with 4-weekly aflibercept until stability is reached. Patients with a good response and stability should initiate monitor-and-extend (not in line with SmPC). Those with a sub-optimal response (meet ‘improvement’ criteria but with additional concerns e.g. fluid worsening on macular volume map) should continue with 4-weekly aflibercept but additional treatments should be considered (aflibercept is not licensed for combination treatment). For patients with no response (no change, or meeting Protocol T ‘worsening’ criteria [≥5-letter decrease in VA and/or ≥ 10% increase in CST] from baseline), switching to a non-anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment should be considered.ConclusionsClinical experience reinforces that, when using aflibercept in DMO, the licensed posology or Protocol T regimens achieve the best outcomes.