Introduction The dissertation is the culminating feature of the doctoral program. The significance of a doctoral student's completed dissertation is of immense importance both to the field and student. Not only does the dissertation signify the candidate's ability to perform independent research, it also confirms the candidate's ability to provide original contributions to the field's knowledge base (Isaac, Quinlan, & Walker, 1992; Katz, 1997; Useem, 1997). The significance of the dissertation does not stop there. The dissertation reflects more than the candidate's training, technical, analytical, and writing skills. The dissertation also impacts the close working relationship between the advisor and the candidate and the reputation of the advisor. Additionally, since external accreditation organizations review PhD candidate dissertations as part of the accreditation process, the dissertation also reflects on the program, department, college, and university as well (Isaac et al., 1992; Katz, 1997). Katz (1997) also identifies society as an important player with a vital interest in the dissertation process because of its implications to research, practice and policy. Reputations of the individual, advisor, and university are all at stake in a doctoral dissertation. Isaac et al. (1992) and Useem (1997) stated that the dissertation may also play a critical role in the initial hiring of new faculty members. As long as the dissertation remains the center of the doctoral degree (Ziolkowski, 1990), it is important to study the factors that influence the selection of a dissertation topic because the lack of understanding can lead to the poor dissertation work, frustration and drop out from the doctoral program. This paper, using dynamic network analysis (DNA), suggest vital factors that might help enhance successful dissertation topic selection. Research Questions The following questions were examined in this research: 1. How do professors' research agendas influence a student's dissertation topic? 2. What kinds of resources (faculty and classes taken) influence a student's selection of his or her dissertation topic? 3. What is the relationship between (a) students knowledge and (b) students' belief in their research topic selection? 4. What dynamic networks do Educational Leadership graduates use to determine their dissertation topics? Literature Review Selecting a dissertation topic may be the most difficult and most important major decision associated with a graduate student's education (Katz, 1997; Lei, 2009). Choosing a dissertation topic is crucial, as it requires identifying one's research interest and the area of one's contribution to knowledge (Luse, Mennecke, & Townsend, 2012). This decision should be well guided and supported by convincing reasons. There is very little literature on what constitutes the most influence on the doctoral student's selection of dissertation topic (Isaac, Koenigsknecht, Malaney, & Karras, 1989). The preponderance of the literature focuses on writing the dissertation, the graduate student experience, and faculty/adviser student relations with scant research on the process of dissertation topic selection (Bargar & Duncan, 1982; Dunham & Lumsden, 1981). Even rarer is the influence of network interactions and relationships in dissertation topic selection. Dynamic network is the context and mechanisms that enable interactions to emerge during the dissertation topic selection process. Context here refers to the interactive atmosphere while mechanism describes the patterns of behavior that produces the desired outcome. The primary outcomes of dynamic networks are adaptability, creativity, and learning (Uhl-Bien, Marion, & McKelvey, 2007). Much of the literature contains very little advice on how to select research topics for this important task (Gatrell, 1991; Isaac et al. …
Read full abstract