Inheritance Of Methylation Patterns Research Articles

General DNA Methylation Patterns and Environmentally-Induced Differential Methylation in the Eastern Oyster (Crassostrea virginica)

Epigenetic modification, specifically DNA methylation, is one possible mechanism for intergenerational plasticity. Before inheritance of methylation patterns can be characterized, we need a better understanding of how environmental change modifies the parental epigenome. To examine the influence of experimental ocean acidification on eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) gonad tissue, oysters were cultured in the laboratory under control (491 ± 49 µatm) or high (2550 ± 211 µatm) pCO2 conditions for four weeks. DNA from reproductive tissue was isolated from five oysters per treatment, then subjected to bisulfite treatment and DNA sequencing. Irrespective of treatment, DNA methylation was primarily found in gene bodies with approximately 22% of CpGs (2.7% of total cytosines) in the C. virginica genome predicted to be methylated. In response to elevated pCO2, we found 598 differentially methylated loci primarily overlapping with gene bodies. A majority of differentially methylated loci were in exons (61.5%) with less intron overlap (31.9%). While there was no evidence of a significant tendency for the genes with differentially methylated loci to be associated with distinct biological processes, the concentration of these loci in gene bodies, including genes involved in protein ubiquitination and biomineralization suggests DNA methylation may be important for transcriptional control in response to ocean acidification. Changes in gonad methylation also indicate potential for these methylation patterns to be inherited by offspring. Understanding how experimental ocean acidification conditions modify the oyster epigenome, and if these modifications are inherited, allows for a better understanding of how ecosystems will respond to environmental change.

Quantitative trait variation is revealed in a novel hypomethylated population of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca).

BackgroundPhenotypic variation is determined by a combination of genotype, environment and their interactions. The realization that allelic diversity can be both genetic and epigenetic allows the environmental component to be further separated. Partitioning phenotypic variation observed among inbred lines with an altered epigenome can allow the epigenetic component controlling quantitative traits to be estimated. To assess the contribution of epialleles on phenotypic variation and determine the fidelity with which epialleles are inherited, we have developed a novel hypomethylated population of strawberry (2n = 2x = 14) using 5-azacytidine from which individuals with altered phenotypes can be identified, selected and characterized.ResultsThe hypomethylated population was generated using an inbred strawberry population in the F. vesca ssp. vesca accession Hawaii 4. Analysis of whole genome sequence data from control and hypomethylated lines indicate that 5-azacytidine exposure does not increase SNP above background levels. The populations contained only Hawaii 4 alleles, removing introgression of alternate F. vesca alleles as a potential source of variation. Although genome sequencing and genetic marker data are unable to rule out 5-azacytidine induced chromosomal rearrangements as a potential source of the trait variation observed, none were detected in our survey. Quantitative trait variation focusing on flowering time and rosette diameter was scored in control and treated populations where expanded levels of variation were observed among the hypomethylated lines. Methylation sensitive molecular markers indicated that 5-azacytidine induced alterations in DNA methylation patterns and inheritance of methylation patterns were confirmed by bisulfite sequencing of targeted regions. It is possible that methylation polymorphisms might underlie or have induced genetic changes underlying the observable differences in quantitative phenotypes.ConclusionsThis population developed in a uniform genetic background provides a resource for the discovery of new variation controlling quantitative traits. Genome sequence analysis indicates that 5-azacytidine did not induce point mutations and the induced variation is largely restricted to DNA methylation. Using this resource, we have identified new variation and demonstrated the inheritance of both variant trait and methylation patterns. Although direct associations remain to be determined, these data suggest epigenetic variation might be subject to selection.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12870-016-0936-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Selective Anchoring of DNA Methyltransferases 3A and 3B to Nucleosomes Containing Methylated DNA

Proper DNA methylation patterns are essential for mammalian development and differentiation. DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) primarily establish and maintain global DNA methylation patterns; however, the molecular mechanisms for the generation and inheritance of methylation patterns are still poorly understood. We used sucrose density gradients of nucleosomes prepared by partial and maximum micrococcal nuclease digestion, coupled with Western blot analysis to probe for the interactions between DNMTs and native nucleosomes. This method allows for analysis of the in vivo interactions between the chromatin modification enzymes and their actual nucleosomal substrates in the native state. We show that little free DNA methyltransferase 3A and 3B (DNMT3A/3B) exist in the nucleus and that almost all of the cellular contents of DNMT3A/3B, but not DNMT1, are strongly anchored to a subset of nucleosomes. This binding of DNMT3A/3B does not require the presence of other well-known chromatin-modifying enzymes or proteins, such as proliferating cell nuclear antigen, heterochromatin protein 1, methyl-CpG binding protein 2, Enhancer of Zeste homolog 2, histone deacetylase 1, and UHRF1, but it does require an intact nucleosomal structure. We also show that nucleosomes containing methylated SINE and LINE elements and CpG islands are the main sites of DNMT3A/3B binding. These data suggest that inheritance of DNA methylation requires cues from the chromatin component in addition to hemimethylation.

Trans‐generation inheritance of methylation patterns in a tobacco transgene following a post‐transcriptional silencing event

We have studied the inheritance of the epigenetic state of tobacco transgenes whose expression was post-transcriptionally silenced by an invertedly repeated silencer locus. We show that, in hybrids, the coding region of the target neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII) gene was almost exclusively methylated at CG configurations, and dense non-CG methylation occurred in the 3' untranslated region. Homologous sequences in the silencer locus were heavily methylated at both CG and non-CG motifs. After segregation of the silencer locus, the CG methylation but not the non-CG methylation of the target genes was transmitted to the progeny. In the segregants, we observed an overall increase of CG methylation in the target genes, associated with a re-distribution from the 3' end of the coding region towards the middle. This pattern was inherited with some fluctuation for at least two additional generations in the absence of a detectable T-DNA-derived small RNA fraction. Thus CG methylation is not cleared during meiosis and may be inherited over generations without RNA signals being present. These epi-allelic variants re-expressed the reporter gene immediately after segregation of the trigger, showing that relatively dense CG methylation (approximately 60-80%) imprinted on most of the coding region (>500 bp) did not reduce expression compared with the parental non-methylated locus. We propose that the genic CG methylation seen in euchromatic regions of the genome may originate from ancient post-transcriptional gene silencing events as a result of adventitiously produced methylation-directing RNA molecules.

DNA methylation patterns: an additional level of information?

The DNA of many organisms contains modified bases such as 5-methylcytosine and 6-methyladenine, in addition to the four unmodified bases (reviewed by Razin and Szyf, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 782, 331-342, 1984). A hallmark of DNA methylation in vertebrates is that a fraction of the CpG dinucleotide sequences is methylated at the 5 ' position (60-80%). The nonmethylated cytosines are distributed in a nonrandom fashion, generating a pattern of methylation that is gene and tissue specific (reviewed by Yisraeli, and Szyf, In DNA methylation: biochemistry and biological significance, Edited by Razin et al., Springer-Verlag, NY. pp. 353-378, 1984). The methylation pattern might therefore play an important role in shaping the differential identity of DNA during development. This nonrandom pattern begs the question: is methylation a passive mirror image of the gene expression profile of the genome, or does it represent an additional level of information? I believe that an understanding of the mechanisms that regulate the formation of methylation patterns is fundamental to assess the biological role of DNA methylation. This commentary proposes a model to explain the molecular mechanisms regulating the formation and inheritance of methylation patterns.