Infusion Site Reactions Research Articles

Continuous Subcutaneous Foslevodopa-Foscarbidopa in Parkinson's Disease: A Mini-Review of Current Scope and Future Outlook.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms, primarily because of the impairment of dopaminergic neurons. Long-term use of levodopa, the standard PD treatment, often results in fluctuating therapeutic effects and dyskinesia, necessitating alternative therapies. This review aims to synthesize current insights and clinical experiences with foslevodopa-foscarbidopa, focusing on its pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety profile, to evaluate its potential in transforming PD therapy. A systematic literature search was conducted up to November 2023 using databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The search yielded eight eligible articles, including pharmacological studies, case reports, observational studies, and controlled trials. No language restrictions were applied. Foslevodopa and foscarbidopa, as prodrugs of levodopa and carbidopa, exhibited excellent chemical stability and solubility, facilitating continuous subcutaneous infusion. Clinical trials demonstrated that these prodrugs maintain stable levodopa levels, thereby addressing the limitations of oral levodopa therapy. Phase 1 and 3 studies indicated significant improvements in motor function and quality of life in advanced PD patients. However, a higher incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, mainly infusion site reactions, was observed compared to oral therapies. Foslevodopa-foscarbidopa emerges as a promising alternative for advanced PD treatment, offering sustained symptom control. Its efficacy in managing motor fluctuations and dyskinesia makes it a viable option in the PD therapeutic spectrum. Future research should focus on long-term safety, economic impact, and broader accessibility. Foslevodopa-foscarbidopa is now commercially distributed in many countries in Europe and in Japan.

Reduced Volume and Faster Infusion Rate of Activated Prothrombin Complex Concentrate: A Phase 3b/4 Trial in Adults with Hemophilia A with Inhibitors.

Background Activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) is indicated for bleed treatment and prevention in patients with hemophilia with inhibitors. The safety and tolerability of intravenous aPCC at a reduced volume and faster infusion rates were evaluated. Methods This multicenter, open-label trial (NCT02764489) enrolled adults with hemophilia A with inhibitors. In part 1, patients were randomized to receive three infusions of aPCC (85 ± 15 U/kg) at 2 U/kg/min (the approved standard rate at the time of the study), in a regular or 50% reduced volume, and were then crossed over to receive three infusions in the alternative volume. In part 2, patients received three sequential infusions of aPCC in a 50% reduced volume at 4 U/kg/min and then at 10 U/kg/min. Primary outcome measures included the incidence of adverse events (AEs), allergic-type hypersensitivity reactions (AHRs), infusion-site reactions (ISRs), and thromboembolic events. Results Of the 45 patients enrolled, 33 received aPCC in part 1 and 30 in part 2. In part 1, 24.2 and 23.3% of patients with regular and reduced volumes experienced AEs, respectively; 11 AEs in eight patients were treatment related. AHRs and ISRs occurred in four (12.1%) and two (6.1%) patients, respectively. In part 2, 3.3 and 14.3% of patients with infusion rates of 4 and 10 U/kg/min experienced AEs, respectively; only one AE in one patient was treatment related; no AHRs or ISRs were reported. Most AEs were mild/moderate in severity. Overall, no thromboembolic events were reported. Conclusions aPCC was well tolerated at a reduced volume and faster infusion rates, with safety profiles comparable to the approved regimen.

Efficacy and safety of stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common autoimmune neurological disease affecting patients’ motor, sensory, and visual performance. Stem Cell Transplantation (SCT) is a medical intervention where a patient is infused with healthy stem cells with the purpose of resetting their immune system. SCT shows remyelinating and immunomodulatory functions in MS patients, representing a potential therapeutic option. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis that included randomized control trials (RCTs) of SCT in MS patients to investigate its clinical efficacy and safety, excluding observational and non-English studies. After systematically searching PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library until January 7, 2024, nine RCTs, including 422 patients, were eligible. We assessed the risk of bias (ROB) in these RCTs using Cochrane ROB Tool 1. Data were synthesized using Review Manager version 5.4 and OpenMeta Analyst software. We also conducted subgroup and sensitivity analyses. SCT significantly improved patients expanded disability status scale after 2 months (N = 39, MD = − 0.57, 95% CI [− 1.08, − 0.06], p = 0.03). SCT also reduced brain lesion volume (N = 136, MD = − 7.05, 95% CI [− 10.69, − 3.4], p = 0.0002). The effect on EDSS at 6 and 12 months, timed 25-foot walk (T25-FW), and brain lesions number was nonsignificant. Significant adverse events (AEs) included local reactions at MSCs infusion site (N = 25, RR = 2.55, 95% CI [1.08, 6.03], p = 0.034) and hematological disorders in patients received immunosuppression and autologous hematopoietic SCT (AHSCT) (N = 16, RR = 2.33, 95% CI [1.23, 4.39], p = 0.009). SCT can improve the disability of MS patients and reduce their brain lesion volume. The transplantation was generally safe and tolerated, with no mortality or significant serious AEs, except for infusion site reactions after mesenchymal SCT and hematological AEs after AHSCT. However, generalizing our results is limited by the sparse number of RCTs conducted on AHSCT. Our protocol was registered on PROSPERO with a registration number: CRD42022324141.

Trilaciclib dosage in Chinese patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a pooled pharmacometrics analysis.

This study aimed to analyze potential ethnic disparities in the dose-exposure-response relationships of trilaciclib, a first-in-class intravenous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor for treating chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This investigation focused on characterizing these relationships in both Chinese and non-Chinese patients to further refine the dosing regimen for trilaciclib in Chinese patients with ES-SCLC. Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) and exposure-response (E-R) analyses were conducted using pooled data from four randomized phase 2/3 trials involving Chinese and non-Chinese patients with ES-SCLC. PopPK analysis revealed that trilaciclib clearance in Chinese patients was approximately 17% higher than that in non-Chinese patients with ES-SCLC. Sex and body surface area influenced trilaciclib pharmacokinetics in both populations but did not exert a significant clinical impact. E-R analysis demonstrated that trilaciclib exposure increased with a dosage escalation from 200 to 280 mg/m2, without notable changes in myeloprotective or antitumor efficacy. However, the incidence of infusion site reactions, headaches, and phlebitis/thrombophlebitis rose with increasing trilaciclib exposure in both Chinese and non-Chinese patients with ES-SCLC. These findings suggest no substantial ethnic disparities in the dose-exposure-response relationship between Chinese and non-Chinese patients. They support the adoption of a 240-mg/m2 intravenous 3-day or 5-day dosing regimen for trilaciclib in Chinese patients with ES-SCLC.

Post-marketing risk analysis of bendamustine: a real-world approach based on the FAERS database.

Objective: Bendamustine was approved for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Despite its therapeutic benefits, the long-term safety of bendamustine in a large population remains inadequately understood. This study evaluates the adverse events (AEs) associated with bendamustine, using a real-world pharmacovigilance database to support its clinical application. Methods: We conducted a post-marketing risk analysis to assess the association between bendamustine and its AEs. Data were extracted from the US FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), covering the period from January 2017 to September 2023. The characteristics of bendamustine-associated AEs and the onset time were further analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using MYSQL 8.0, Navicat Premium 15, Microsoft EXCEL 2016, and Minitab 21.0. Results: 9,461,874 reports were collected from the FAERS database, 9,131 identified bendamustine as the "primary suspected" drug. We identified 331 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs). Common AEs included pyrexia, neutropenia, infusion site reaction, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), injection site vasculitis, and pneumonia-all documented on bendamustine's label. Notably, 16 unexpected and significant AEs were discovered, including hypogammaglobulinemia, which is concerning due to its potential to increase infection susceptibility following bendamustine treatment. Other significant findings were anaphylactic reactions, PML, and cutaneous malignancies, suggesting updates to the drug's label may be necessary. Physicians should monitor for neurological and skin changes in patients and discontinue treatment if PML is suspected. Moreover, the median onset time for bendamustine-associated AEs was 13 days, with an interquartile range [IQR] of 0-59 days, predominantly occurring on the first day post-initiation. The β of bendamustine-related AEs suggested risk reduction over time. Conclusion: Our study uncovered some potential pharmacovigilance signals for bendamustine, providing important insights for its safe and effective clinical use.

Characterization of Infusion Site Reactions (ISR) with 24-hour Subcutaneous Infusion of ND0612: Findings from an Integrated Safety Database (P9-3.010)

Characterization of Infusion Site Reactions (ISR) with 24-hour Subcutaneous Infusion of ND0612: Findings from an Integrated Safety Database (P9-3.010)

Safety and efficacy of continuous subcutaneous levodopa–carbidopa infusion (ND0612) for Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations (BouNDless): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre trial

Conventional oral levodopa therapy for the treatment of Parkinson's disease can be associated with variations in plasma concentrations. Levodopa infusion strategies might provide more consistent drug delivery and fewer motor fluctuations. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of a continuous 24 h/day subcutaneous infusion of ND0612 (a levodopa-carbidopa solution) compared with oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa for the treatment of motor fluctuations in people with Parkinson's disease. We conducted a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicentre trial at 117 academic and community neurology sites in 16 countries, including in Europe, Israel, and the USA. Eligible participants were men and women aged 30 years or older with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr stage ≤3 in the on state) who experienced at least 2·5 h/day of off time. Participants underwent an open-label run-in phase (<12 weeks), during which time optimal regimens were established for both oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa and for 24 h/day subcutaneous ND0612 infusion (levodopa-carbidopa 60·0/7·5 mg/mL), with supplemental oral levodopa-carbidopa if needed. Participants were then randomly assigned (1:1) to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with their optimised regimen of either subcutaneous ND0612 or oral levodopa-carbidopa, with matching oral or subcutaneous placebo given as required to maintain blinding. Randomisation was done via an interactive web response system, stratified by region, using a permuted block schedule. Participants, study partners, treating investigators, study site personnel, and the sponsor were masked to treatment group allocation. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline (ie, time of randomisation, when all patients were receiving an optimised open-label ND0612 regimen) to end of the double-blind phase in total daily on time without troublesome dyskinesia, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04006210, and is complete. Between Sept 30, 2019, and April 8, 2022, 381 participants were enrolled, of whom 259 (68%) were randomly assigned, 128 (49%) to subcutaneous ND0612 and 131 (51%) to oral levodopa-carbidopa. 243 (94%) participants completed the study. Treatment with subcutaneous ND0612 provided an additional 1·72 h (95% CI 1·08 to 2·36) of on time without troublesome dyskinesia compared with oral levodopa-carbidopa (change from baseline of -0·48 h [-0·94 to -0·02] with subcutaneous ND0612 vs -2·20 h [-2·65 to -1·74] with oral levodopa-carbidopa; p<0·0001). Significant treatment differences favouring subcutaneous ND0612 were also found in the first four of nine prespecified hierarchical outcomes of daily off time (-1·40 h [95% CI -1·99 to -0·80]), Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part II scores (-3·05 [-4·28 to -1·81]), Patients Global Impression of Change (odds ratio [OR] 5·31 [2·67 to 10·58]), and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (OR 7·23 [3·57 to 14·64]). Hierarchical testing ended after the fourth secondary endpoint. Adverse events were reported by 287 (89%) of 322 participants during open-label ND0612 optimisation, and by 103 (80%) of 128 in the ND0612 group and 97 (74%) of 131 in the oral levodopa-carbidopa group during the double-blind phase. The most common adverse events were infusion-site reactions (266 [83%] participants during open-label ND0612, and 73 [57%] in the ND0612 group vs 56 [43%] in the oral levodopa-carbidopa group during the double-blind phase), most of which were mild. Serious adverse events in four participants in the ND0612 group were related to study treatment (infusion-site cellulitis [n=2], infusion-site abscess and infusion-site ulcer [n=1]; and paraesthesia and peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy [n=1]). One participant in the ND0612 group died during the double-blind phase, but the death was not related to study treatment (fall leading to traumatic brain injury). Results of this phase 3 study showed that subcutaneous ND0612 used in combination with oral immediate-release levodopa-carbidopa increased on time without troublesome dyskinesia and reduced off time, with a favourable benefit-risk profile. ND0612 might offer a safe and efficacious subcutaneous levodopa infusion approach to managing motor fluctuations in people with Parkinson's disease. The ongoing open-label extension phase will provide further information on the long-term efficacy and safety of treatment. NeuroDerm.

Continuous Subcutaneous Delivery of rhPTH(1-84) and rhPTH(1-34) by Pump in Adults With Hypoparathyroidism.

Continuous subcutaneous infusion of recombinant parathyroid hormone (rhPTH) through a pump has been proposed as a therapeutic alternative for patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism who remain symptomatic or hypercalciuric on conventional treatment (calcium and active vitamin D) or daily injections of rhPTH(1-84) or rhPTH(1-34). However, the real-world evidence of the outcome of this novel therapy is limited. We report the clinical and biochemical outcomes of 12 adults with hypoparathyroidism (11 women, age 30-70 years, and 1 man, age 30 years) from 3 different clinical sites in the United States who were transitioned from conventional therapy to daily injections of rhPTH(1-84) or rhPTH(1-34) and then switched to continuous administration of rhPTH(1-84)/rhPTH(1-34) via pump therapy. In most patients, mean serum calcium concentrations increased while on PTH pump therapy compared with both conventional therapy (in 11 patients) and single/multiple daily rhPTH injections (in 8 patients). Despite this, 10 patients had lower median 24-hour urinary calcium levels while on PTH pump therapy compared with prior therapy (mean ± SD difference: -130 ± 222 mg/24 hours). All patients reported a qualitative decrease in hypocalcemic symptoms while receiving pump therapy. Three patients had pod failure at least once, and 1 patient developed an infusion site reaction. In this case series of 12 patients with chronic hypoparathyroidism treated with rhPTH(1-84)/rhPTH(1-34) administered via a pump, improvement in clinical and biochemical parameters were observed in the majority of the patients. Our observations indicate benefits of pump administration of rhPTH that warrant further investigation.

Safety of Intravenous Push Valproate Compared with Intravenous Piggyback at a Tertiary Academic Medical Center.

Data are limited regarding the safety associated with administering valproate sodium by intravenous push (IVP) compared with intravenous piggyback (IVPB). The objective of this retrospective pre-post analysis was to compare the safety profile of valproate administration via IVPB from March to May 2022 and IVP from June to August 2022. A total of 890 IVPB and 440 IVP administrations were included. The major endpoint of this analysis was the incidence of infusion site reactions (infiltration or phlebitis). The incidence of documented intravenous (IV) site reactions demonstrated minimal differences between both IVPB and IVP administration cohorts. Based on the Naranjo algorithm, all IVPB and IVP infusion site reactions were classified as possible or doubtful. Additional safety endpoints included bradycardia, hypotension, or sedation attributable to valproate sodium administration. Similar safety profiles were observed, including valproate-associated bradycardia, hypotension, and sedation events. All safety events were further classified as possible or doubtful by the Naranjo algorithm. Time from pharmacist verification to valproate administration was also collected. The mean time from pharmacist order verification to valproate administration was significantly faster in the IVP cohort compared to the IVPB cohort. IVP valproate administration may be considered safe, allowing for more optimal clinical and operational outcomes in the acute care setting.

P115 Ustekinumab in DEVELOP: A safety analysis from an Inflammatory Bowel Disease multicenter, prospective, long-term registry of paediatric patients

Abstract Background DEVELOP is a multi-center, global, prospective, observational, longitudinal registry of long-term safety of infliximab (and other treatments) in paediatric patients (pts) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) &amp;lt;18 years (yrs) at diagnosis. Over the course of follow-up, many pts required changes in therapy. Ustekinumab (UST) is approved for treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD) in adults and is currently being evaluated for safety/efficacy in paediatric pts. This report focuses on assessment of safety of UST in paediatric pts with CD from DEVELOP. Methods Data included paediatric pts treated with UST from 31 May 2007 through 30 June 2022; data are collected every 6 months. The analyzed population included: all paediatric pts (all pts), pts weighing &amp;lt;40kg (&amp;lt;40kg group), and pts weighing ≥40kg (≥40kg group). Assessments included medical and treatment history, UST exposure, adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), CD-related SAEs leading to hospitalization, IBD surgeries, serious and opportunistic infections, malignancies, and deaths. Results A total of 150 pts received UST (49.3% females); 31 in the &amp;lt;40kg group and 119 in the ≥40kg group (Table 1). Most treated pts (92.0%) were 12-17yrs. The majority (91%) of pts were initially dosed with UST every 8 weeks (q8w); at the last known dose, 64% received UST q8w and 22% q4w. Mean (SD) age of initial UST exposure was 15yrs (2.19). Prior IBD surgery was reported in 65.3% pts. The majority of pts (98%) had prior biologic therapy and 72% received ≥2 biologics prior to UST. Overall, 37/150 (24.7%) of pts discontinued UST during follow-up, with a mean (SD) time to discontinuation of 16.7 (17.00) months; 84/150 (56.0%) were exposed to UST for ≥24 months. Rates (events/100 pt-yrs) of AEs were higher in the ≥40kg group (177.62) than in the &amp;lt;40kg group (101.27). Rates of SAEs were slightly lower among the ≥40kg group (25.42) vs &amp;lt;40kg (32.67). There were no SAEs related to infusion or injection site reactions. Rates of serious infections and CD-related hospitalizations were low and similar between groups, and rates of IBD-related surgeries were similar between groups (Figure 1). One malignancy (malignant carcinoid tumor) was reported in a female (18yrs) in the ≥40kg group with a history of prior therapy with vedolizumab, methotrexate, and 6-MP. No deaths or opportunistic infections were reported. Conclusion The safety profile observed for this off-label use of UST in paediatric CD pts in DEVELOP was similar to that of the treated adult population, despite most paediatric pts having prior biologic exposure. No new safety signals are identified in this paediatric population.

Advancements and Challenges in Antiamyloid Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Comprehensive Review.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by the accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) proteins and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain. There have been recent advancements in antiamyloid therapy for AD. This narrative review explores the recent advancements and challenges in antiamyloid therapy. In addition, a summary of evidence from antiamyloid therapy trials is presented with a focus on lecanemab. Lecanemab is the most recently approved monoclonal antibody that targets Aβ protofibrils for the treatment of patients with early AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Lecanemab was the first drug shown to slow cognitive decline in patients with MCI or early onset AD dementia when administered as an infusion once every two weeks. In the Clarity AD trial, lecanemab was associated with infusion-site reactions (26.4%) and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (12.6%). The clinical relevance and long-term side effects of lecanemab require further longitudinal observation. However, several challenges must be addressed before the drug can be routinely used in clinical practice. The drug's route of administration, need for imaging and genetic testing, affordability, accessibility, infrastructure, and potential for serious side effects are some of these challenges. Lecanemab's approval has fueled interest in the potential of other antiamyloid therapies, such as donanemab. Future research must focus on developing strategies to prevent AD; identify easy-to-use validated plasma-based assays; and discover newer user-friendly, and cost-effective drugs that target multiple pathways in AD pathology.

Safety Profile of High-Dose Intravenous Push Lacosamide.

Lacosamide (LCM) is an antiseizure medication used to manage status epilepticus (SE). Previous retrospective analyses have demonstrated safety and efficiency in intravenous push (IVP) administration at 80mg per minute. Quick administration can be achieved in a high-acuity setting without the additional time required for compounding. However, previous literature only partially represents high doses of IVP LCM, which limits the understanding of the safety profile of these doses. Our study was a single-center, retrospective, single-arm analysis of patients who received IVP LCM 300mg or 400mg during admission. The primary outcome was the incidence of infusion site reactions, hypotension, and bradycardia within 2hours of IVP administration. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of PR prolongation. A total of 113 patients were evaluated for infusion site reactions. Of these, 108 patients had vital signs assessed within 2hours of IVP LCM and could be evaluated for hypotension and bradycardia. The sample primarily consisted of LCM 400mg IVP (85.8%). The primary outcome consisted of 7 (6.2%) infusion reactions, 12 (11.1%) hypotensive events, and no reports of bradycardia. Each adverse event was assessed using the Naranjo Adverse Drug Probability Scale. All events scored less than two, suggesting the possibility was likely related to factors other than the medication. In conclusion, LCM 300mg and 400mg IVP administration have the potential to facilitate more rapid treatment of seizures without additional risk of infusion site reactions, hypotension, and bradycardia.

Safety and Efficacy of Continuous Subcutaneous Levodopa/Carbidopa Infusion for Parkinson’s disease: Three-Year Data from the Open-Label BeyoND study (PL4.003)

Safety and Efficacy of Continuous Subcutaneous Levodopa/Carbidopa Infusion for Parkinson’s disease: Three-Year Data from the Open-Label BeyoND study (PL4.003)

Long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a subcutaneous immunoglobulin 16.5% (cutaquig®) in the treatment of patients with primary immunodeficiencies.

A prospective study and its long-term extension examined whether weekly treatment of patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) with a 16.5% subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg; cutaquig®) confers acceptable efficacy, safety, and tolerability over a follow-up of up to 238 weeks (>4 years). Seventy-five patients received 4462 infusions during up to 70 weeks of follow-up in the main study and 27 patients received 2777 infusions during up to 168 weeks of follow-up in the extension. In the main study, there were no serious bacterial infections (SBIs), and the annual rate of other infections was 3.3 (95% CI 2.4, 4.5). One SBI was recorded in the extension, for an SBI rate of 0.02 (upper 99% CI 0.19). The annual rate of all infections over the duration of the extension study was 2.2 (95% CI 1.2, 3.9). Only 15.0% (1085) of 7239 infusions were associated with infusion site reactions (ISRs), leaving 85.0% (6153) of infusions without reactions. The majority of ISRs were mild and transient. ISR incidence decreased over time, from 36.9% to 16% during the main study and from 9% to 2.3% during the extension. The incidence of related systemic adverse events was 14.7% in the main study and 7.4% in the extension. In conclusion, this prospective, long-term study with cutaquig showed maintained efficacy and low rates of local and systemic adverse reactions in PID patients over up to 238 weeks of follow-up.

Safety and Tolerability of 23.4% Hypertonic Saline Administered Over 2 to 5 Minutes for the Treatment of Cerebral Herniation and Intracranial Pressure Elevation.

Hyperosmolar therapy is the cornerstone of medical management of sustained elevated intracranial pressure from cerebral edema. Acute intracranial hypertension and herniation is a medical emergency that requires rapid treatment and stabilization to prevent secondary brain injury or death. Intravenous hypertonic sodium chloride (NaCl) 23.4% is an effective treatment modality commonly used in this setting. Because of its high osmolarity, use has historically been limited primarily to central venous line administration as an intermittent infusion due to concerns about thrombophlebitis, injection site pain, and tissue necrosis or injury with extravasation. The objective of this analysis was to prospectively evaluate the safety of administration of 23.4% NaCl as a rapid intravenous push over 2-5min. A prospective analysis of patients admitted between April 2021 and December 2021 who received 23.4% NaCl intravenous push over 2-5min in a central or peripheral line was performed. Safety end points included incidence of new onset hypotension [defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90mm Hg or SBP decrease of at least 20mm Hg], bradycardia (defined as heart rate < 50 beats per minute), and infusion site reactions documented within 1h of administration. For secondary safety outcomes, highest and lowest SBP and lowest heart rates documented within 1h before 23.4% NaCl administration were compared with values collected within 1h post administration and evaluated by mixed-design analysis of variance test with adjustment for peripheral versus central line administration. We identified 32 patients who received 79 administrations of 23.4% NaCl through a central line or peripheral line during the study period. An SBP decrease of at least 20mm Hg was observed in 13% of patients, an SBP < 90mm Hg occurred in 16% of patients, and bradycardia occurred in 3% of patients who received 23.4% NaCl. Injection site pain was reported by one patient without documented thrombophlebitis, cellulitis, or tissue damage. Pain was not reported during two subsequent administrations in the same patient. There was no documented occurrence of soft tissue injury or necrosis in any patient. Compared with baseline vital signs before 23.4% NaCl administration, no difference in vital signs post administration was observed. Central and peripheral administration of 23.4% NaCl over 2-5min was well tolerated, and incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, or infusion site-related adverse events was rare.

Transitioning subcutaneous immunoglobulin 20% therapies in patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies: Canadian real-world study

BackgroundReal-world data on transitioning to Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human) 20% solution (Ig20Gly) are limited. This study aimed to assess infusion parameters and experience of patients with primary (PID) or secondary immunodeficiencies (SID) transitioning to Ig20Gly in clinical practice in Canada.MethodsPatients with PID or SID who received subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) for ≥ 3 months before transitioning to Ig20Gly were eligible for this multicenter (n = 6), phase 4, non-interventional, prospective, single-arm study. Ig20Gly infusion parameters, dosing, and adverse events were collected from patient medical records at Ig20Gly initiation and 3, 6, and 12 months post-initiation. Patient satisfaction and quality of life were assessed 12 months post-initiation using validated questionnaires.ResultsThe study included 125 patients (PID, n = 60; SID, n = 64; PID + SID, n = 1). Median volume per infusion was 30.0 ml at initiation, and 40.0 ml at 6 and 12 months post-initiation. Most patients administered Ig20Gly weekly and used two infusion sites (primarily abdomen). At each time point, median infusion duration was ≤ 1 h. At 12 months, 61% of infusions were administered via a pump and 39% manually. Headache and infusion-site reactions were the most reported adverse events of interest. Patients expressed overall satisfaction with Ig20Gly at 12 months post-initiation, with all respondents indicating they would like to continue Ig20Gly.ConclusionsThis study provides a detailed description of Ig20Gly infusion parameters, tolerability, and quality of life in clinical practice among patients with PID or SID switching to Ig20Gly from another SCIG and confirms the feasibility of infusing Ig20Gly via pump or manual administration.Trial registration NCT03716700, Registered 31 August 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03716700

Efficacy and safety of rituximab as second-line therapy in immune thrombocytopenic purpura based on ethnicity: A descriptive study among the Arabic population.

Background: Rituximab is used as second-line therapy in patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who do not respond to first-line management. The response rate for Rituximab is variable in different populations ranging from 30% to 90%. The adverse effects of rituximab in patients with ITP range from infusion site reactions to the reactivation of hepatitis B virus and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and interpopulation variation.Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study in Qatar's National Center for Cancer Care & Research. The study included patients with chronic refractory ITP who received rituximab as second-line therapy. Descriptive and summary statistics were used to describe the sociodemographic parameters of the study cohort.Results: Of the 41 patients with chronic ITP, 26 were Arabs, 12 were Asians, and 3 were of other ethnicities. Rituximab was associated with an overall response rate of 80.4%. Arabic patients had the highest clinical response (84.6%) among the ethnicities with the lowest adverse effects (11.5%). Asians had a response rate of 66.6%, and adverse effects were seen in 16.7% of the patients.Conclusions: In chronic refractory ITP, rituximab appears to have a better clinical response in the Arabic population with minimal toxicity than in other ethnicities.

Performance of Fast-Acting Aspart Insulin as Compared to Aspart Insulin in Insulin Pump for Managing Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis.

No meta-analysis has analysed efficacy and safety of fast-acting aspart insulin (FIAsp) with insulin pump in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Electronic databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving T1DM patients on insulin pump receiving FIAsp in intervention arm, and placebo/active comparator insulin in control arm. Primary outcome was to evaluate changes in 1- and 2-hour post-prandial glucose (1hPPG and 2hPPG). Secondary outcomes were to evaluate alterations in percentage time with blood glucose <3.9 mmol/L (hypoglycaemia), time in range (TIR) blood glucose 3.9 to 10 mmol/L, insulin requirements and adverse events. Data from four RCTs involving 640 patients was analysed. FIAsp use in insulin pump was associated with significantly greater lowering of 1hPPG (mean difference [MD], -1.35 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.72 to -0.98; P<0.01; I2=63%) and 2hPPG (MD, -1.19 mmol/L; 95% CI, -1.38 to -1.00; P<0.01; I2=0%) as compared to controls. TIR was comparable among groups (MD, 1.06%; 95% CI, -3.84 to 5.96; P=0.67; I2=70%). Duration of blood glucose <3.9 mmol/L was lower in FIAsp group, approaching significance (MD, -0.91%; 95% CI, -1.84 to 0.03; P=0.06; I2=0%). Total hypoglycaemic episodes (risk ratio [RR], 1.35; 95% CI, 0.55 to 3.31; P=0.51; I2=0%), severe hypoglycaemia (RR, 2.26; 95% CI, 0.77 to 6.66; P=0.14), infusion site reactions (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.63 to 2.93; P=0.77; I2=0%), and treatment-emergent adverse events (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.60; P=0.50; I2=0%) were comparable. FIAsp use in insulin pump is associated with better post-prandial glycaemic control with no increased hypoglycaemia or glycaemic variability.

A Multi\u2011Center, Open\u2011Label, Single\u2011Arm Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy,\xa0Pharmacokinetics, and Safety and Tolerability of IGSC 20% in Subjects\xa0with Primary Immunodeficiency

PurposeThe purpose of this phase 3 study was to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human), 20% Caprylate/Chromatography Purified (IGSC 20%) in patients with primary immunodeficiency (PI).MethodsImmunoglobulin treatment-experienced subjects with PI received 52 weeks of IGSC 20% given weekly at the same dose as the subject’s previous IgG regimen (DAF 1:1); the minimum dose was 100 mg/kg/week. The primary endpoint was serious bacterial infections (SBIs [null vs alternative hypothesis: SBI rate per person per year ≥ 1 vs < 1]). IgG subclasses and specific pathogen antibody levels were also measured.ResultsSixty-one subjects (19 children [≤ 12 years], 10 adolescents [> 12–16 years], and 32 adults) were enrolled. The rate of SBIs per person per year was 0.017. The 1-sided 99% upper confidence limit was 0.036 (< 1), and the null hypothesis was rejected. The rate of hospitalization due to infection per person per year was 0.017 (2-sided 95% confidence interval: 0.008–0.033) overall. The mean trough total IgG concentrations were comparable to the previous IgG replacement regimen. The average of the individual mean trough ratios (IGSC 20%:previous regimen) was 1.078 (range: 0.83–1.54). The average steady-state mean trough IgG concentrations were 947.64 and 891.37 mg/dL, respectively. Seven subjects had serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); none was drug-related. The rate of all TEAEs, including local infusion site reactions, during 3045 IGSC 20% infusions was 0.135. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate.ConclusionsIGSC 20% demonstrated efficacy and good safety and tolerability in subjects with PI.

1099. Evaluation of the Safety and Pharmacokinetics (PK) following Administration of Single and Multiple Doses of Anti-Staphylococcal Lysin, LSVT-1701, in Healthy Adult Subjects

BackgroundLSVT-1701 is an anti-staphylococcal phage lysin being developed for treatment of MRSA infections in combination with SoC antibiotics. The safety and PK of single ascending doses of LSVT-1701 0.1 to 10 mg/kg in healthy adult volunteers were previously described (Jun, et.al, AAC 2017;61:e02629-16). We further evaluated the safety and PK of multiple ascending doses of LSVT-1701 in healthy adult subjects.MethodsStudy ITB-101-1b was a Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending dose study. 8 subjects were randomized 3:1 to active:placebo in each cohort. LSVT-1701 was administered as a 6 mg/kg single dose and twice daily (BID) doses of 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 mg/kg for 4 days (24h between Doses 1-2, 12h between Doses 2-6). Study drugs were administered as a 1-hour IV infusion. Serial serum samples were collected over 24 hours following the first and last doses for measurement of LSVT-1701 concentrations by a validated ELISA method. PK analysis of LSVT-1701 concentration-time data was done using noncompartmental methods. Safety was assessed by AEs, clinical labs, vital signs, and ECG.Results30/32 (94%) subjects completed the study. No subjects withdrew due to AEs, and there were no severe AEs, no serious AEs, and no deaths. AEs were of mild (97%) to moderate (3%) intensity and were reported by all subjects in the LSVT-1701 6 mg/kg single dose group and 1-3 (17-50%) of subjects receiving 1.5 to 4.5 mg/kg BID or placebo. The most common AEs of headache, chills, rigors, and fever generally lasted for ≤2 days with or without acetaminophen treatment, and no clinically significant changes in blood pressure, heart rate, ECG, or clinical labs (other than transient increases in CRP) were observed. Infusion site reactions (erythema, pain, induration, warmth) were observed with BID administration of LSVT-1701, but not with the single 6 mg/kg dose or placebo. LSVT-1701 exposure increased greater than in proportion to dose and t1/2 was concentration-dependent, increasing with higher doses. No accumulation in LSVT-1701 exposure was observed.Summary of LSVT-1701 PK Parameters Summary of LSVT-1701 PK ParametersConclusionThe safety and PK profile of LSVT-1701 is favorable for evaluation in patients with S. aureus infections, including bacteremia and infective endocarditis, for which new treatments are needed.Disclosures Mary Beth Wire, Pharm#, Lysovant (Consultant) Soo youn Jun, PhD, iNtRON Biotechnology (Consultant) In-Jin Jany, PhD, iNtRON (Consultant) Jun Gi Hwang, PhD, Lysovant (Consultant) David Huang, MD, PhD, Lysovant (Consultant)