Infusion-related Reactions In Patients Research Articles

Dexamethasone is non-inferior to antihistamine plus dexamethasone premedication in preventing ramucirumab plus nab-paclitaxel infusion-related reactions in gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

PurposeRamucirumab (RAM) is recommended as premedication with H1-receptor antagonists (H1RA) to prevent infusion-related reactions (IRRs). However, RAM is a human antibody with a low incidence of IRRs. We evaluated the noninferiority of non-H1RA (dexamethasone [DEX] alone) premedication to H1RA (plus DEX) premedication in terms of IRRs in patients with gastric cancer receiving RAM plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX).MethodsThis was a noninferiority, multicenter, retrospective trial conducted in three Japanese centers to assess the incidence of IRRs in patients receiving RAM plus nab-PTX for gastric cancer between 2018 and 2023. Patients with gastric cancer receiving RAM plus nab-PTX were divided into groups with and without H1RA premedication. The incidence of IRRs was compared between the two groups.ResultsNinety patients were evaluated, with non-H1RA and H1RA premedications in 43 and 47 cases, respectively. After the first dose of RAM, IRRs were not observed in either group. IRRs during the overall doses were 0% for non-H1RA premedication and 2.1% for H1RA premedication (90% confidence interval (CI): –5.6%–1.3% for each comparison). The upper limit of the 90% CI (1.3%) did not exceed the noninferiority margin (Δ) of + 10% and therefore met the noninferiority criteria.ConclusionRAM plus nab-PTX for gastric cancer with DEX premedication may be possible without H1RA premedication.

EP.17A.04 Real-World Rates of Infusion-Related Reactions in Patients with EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Receiving Amivantamab

EP.17A.04 Real-World Rates of Infusion-Related Reactions in Patients with EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Receiving Amivantamab

Expert consensus on the management of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) receiving crizanlizumab: a RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panel.

Crizanlizumab, a monoclonal antibody against P-selectin, has been shown to reduce vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) compared to placebo in patients ≥ 16 years with sickle cell disease (SCD). However, there have been rare reports of patients experiencing severe pain and subsequent complications within 24hours of crizanlizumab infusions. These events are defined as infusion-related reactions (IRRs). Informed by current literature and clinical experience, a group of content experts developed clinical guidelines for the management of IRRs in patients with SCD. We used the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) modified Delphi panel method, a valid, reproducible technique for achieving consensus. We present our recommendations for managing IRRs, which depend on patient characteristics including: prior history of IRRs to other monoclonal antibodies or medications, changes to crizanlizumab infusion rate and patient monitoring, pain severity relative to patient's typical SCD crises, and severe allergic symptoms. These recommendations outline how to evaluate and manage IRRs in patients receiving crizanlizumab. Future research should validate this guidance using clinical data and identify patients at risk for these IRRs.

Infusion-related reactions with immune checkpoint inhibitors in genitourinary cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

604 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used to treat genitourinary cancers, particularly urothelial carcinoma (UC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) have been reported in up to 20% of all patients treated with ICIs. However, the risk of IRRs varies with the type of ICI and the accurate incidence in genitourinary cancers remains unclear. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the incidence of IRRs in patients with genitourinary cancers treated with ICIs. Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science to identify phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating ICIs (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA-4], programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1], and programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1] inhibitors) in patients with UC and RCC. The odds ratio [OR] of grade 1-5 and grade 3-5 IRRs was calculated and pooled by the random-effect model meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was performed based on study types as follows: 1) Studies with a design “ICI plus treatment A (including placebo/observation) vs. treatment A”, 2) Studies evaluating ICI monotherapy vs. chemotherapy in patients with UC, and 3) Studies assessing ICI plus vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGF-TKIs) vs. sunitinib in patients with RCC. When IRRs were reported in studies evaluating oral VEGF-TKIs, IRRs were referred to as hypersensitivity or anaphylactic reactions, defined in each RCT. Results: We identified 12 RCTs with 10,001 participants for the meta-analysis, out of which one evaluated a CTLA-4 inhibitor while the others evaluated PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. The addition of ICIs to other systemic therapies was associated with significantly higher rates of grade 1-5 IRRs (OR=2.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-7.29, p = 0.02) but not of grade 3-5 IRRs (OR=2.98, 95% CI: 0.64-13.74, p = 0.16). When compared to chemotherapy, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy was not associated with an increase in either grade 1-5 (OR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.25-2.95, p = 0.81) or grade 3-5 IRRs (OR=1.13, 95% CI: 0.07-18.19, p = 0.93) in patients with UC. When compared to sunitinib in patients with RCC, the combination of ICI plus VEGF-TKIs was not associated with an increase in either grade 1-5 (OR=5.43, 95% CI: 0.62-46.07, p = 0.13) or grade 3-5 IRRs (OR=3.49, 95% CI: 0.64-19.04, p = 0.15). Sensitivity analysis performed by removing studies evaluating avelumab did not alter the overall results (data will be presented). Conclusions: Compared to the previous standard of care without ICIs, therapies with ICIs were not associated with increased IRRs in genitourinary cancers. However, the addition of ICIs to other systemic therapies was associated with an increased incidence of IRRs. The latter merits further prospective evaluation and careful consideration while designing clinical trials.

The utility of H2 receptor antagonists in preventing infusion-related reactions to paclitaxel chemotherapy.

Paclitaxel has a risk of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) and despite no prospective evidence, is often given with premedication including a corticosteroid, H1 antagonist, and H2 antagonist (H2RA). Backorders impacted the supply of intravenous H2RAs at our center, and it was removed as routine premedication. The authors compared the incidence of IRR in patients treated without H2RA to patients receiving standard H2RA premedication. The authors reviewed outpatients starting paclitaxel at the Ottawa Hospital from December 2019 to October 2021. Two cohorts were created: patients treated without H2RA premedication (intervention), and those receiving standard H2RA (control). Demographics, treatment, and IRR information were collected retrospectively. Primary end point was rate of grade ≥2 IRRs during first two doses of paclitaxel. A total of 182 patients were treated without H2RA premedication, compared to 184 control patients treated during non-backorder periods. Baseline characteristics included: median age, 63 years; 86% female; and primary tumor 52% breast/24% gynecologic/10% gastric/esophageal/8% lung/6% other. There were no significant differences between cohorts in baseline characteristics. There was no difference in the rate of grade ≥2 IRR between cohorts; 12.1% (22 of 182; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7%-17.7%) for patients treated without H2RA, and 15.1% (28 of 185; 95% CI, 10.3%-21.1%) for control patients. The rate of grade ≥3 IRRs were also similar, 4.4% in intervention cohort versus 3.8% in control cohort. The removal of H2RAs from premedication for paclitaxel did not result in an increased incidence of IRRs. The use of H2RAs in preventing IRRs to paclitaxel should be re-evaluated.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Infusion-Related Reactions Following Rituximab Administration in Patients with Desensitization before Renal Transplantation.

Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are the major side effects of rituximab administration. Although several studies have reported predictive markers for IRRs in patients with malignancies, there are no such reports for patients without malignancies. Accordingly, we aimed to clarify the predictive markers for rituximab-induced IRRs in renal transplant recipients. This retrospective study included 116 inpatients aged ≥18 years who received an initial dose of 150 mg/m2 of rituximab for desensitization before renal transplantation with loxoprofen and diphenhydramine before rituximab infusion between June 2007 and February 2022. Overall, 45 patients were evaluated and 71 patients were excluded in this study. IRRs were observed in 12 (26.7%) patients. The proportion of men in the IRRs group was significantly higher than that in the non-IRRs group (p = 0.023). Additionally, body weight, body surface area (BSA), and body mass index (BMI) were significantly higher in the IRRs group than in the non-IRRs group (body weight, p = 0.0058; BSA, p = 0.0051; BMI, p = 0.017). Their cutoff values for predicting rituximab-induced IRRs, based on the receiver-operating characteristic curve, were 74.850 kg, 1.910 m2 and 24.164 kg/m2, respectively. In conclusion, the male sex, high actual body weight, BSA, and BMI may be new predictive markers for rituximab-induced IRRs in renal transplant recipients. Therefore, clinicians should carefully monitor patients who receive rituximab before renal transplantation and present with the predictive markers.

Same Day Infusion of Iron Therapy Is Associated With No Increased Risk for Adverse Events Among Patients Receiving Biological Infusions for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

The goal of this study was to compare the relative safety of administering iron infusions on the same day as intravenous (IV) biological therapy to the administration of these treatments on different days in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IV iron therapy is often required in patients with IBD. Many patients with IBD who receive IV iron therapy in the outpatient setting also receive biological infusion therapy for treatment of their IBD. Patients with IBD who received IV iron therapy at a single infusion center were included. We compared documented infusion-related reactions in patients with patients receiving an iron infusion on the same day as their biological infusion to those who received their iron infusion on a different day. Among 481 patients, 129 received an iron infusion on the same day as a biologic infusion. There was no significant difference in the incidence of infusion reaction when comparing patients who received biological infusion therapy in the same session as the iron infusion to those patients who received a biological infusion on a different day (5% vs. 7%, P =0.246) or any IBD-related therapy (5% vs. 8%, P =0.206). The frequency and type of infusion reactions in patients receiving IV iron therapy on the same day after IV therapy with biologics was not increased compared with patients who received a biological infusion on a different day. A sequential infusion of biological therapy followed by IV iron therapy may be a safe and cost-effective approach.

MO4-1 Management of infusion-related reactions in patients receiving amivantamab in the CHRYSALIS study

Amivantamab is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-MET bispecific antibody approved in the US for the treatment of EGFR exon 20 insertion non-small cell lung cancer that progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. We review infusion-related reactions (IRRs) and its management in patients (pts) treated with amivantamab.

Abstract P2-13-27: Infusion-related reactions in patients receiving pertuzumab and trastuzumab: A retrospective study

Abstract BACKGROUND: The use of two anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) (pertuzumab and trastuzumab) combined with taxanes is the standard of care for first line treatment in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Infusion related reactions (IRR) during first administration of anti-HER2 mAb have been reported. Reintroduction of the causal drugs is often possible, but there is no data to identify patients at highest risk of developing IRR and modalities of safe reintroduction. The aim of this study was to report patients who experienced IRR during anti-HER2 mAbs infusions at Institut Curie Hospitals (ICH) and to describe these reactions. METHODS: All IRR cases must be reported to the ICH pharmacies. We retrospectively inspected the electronic record of patients who experienced an IRR during pertuzumab (Pmab) and trastuzumab (Tmab). We collected patients’ characteristics, grade of IRR and outcomes. RESULTS: From January 2013 to December 2020, a total of 223 patients had at least one Pmab+Tmab infusion as part of their BC treatment. Among them, 28 patients (8%) with anti-HER2 mAb IRR were identified. All patients but one had an HER2-positive BC; the HER2-negative case was a HER3-mutant mBC. Twelve patients (43%) had de novo mBC. Twenty-six patients (93%) received Pmab+Tmab as first line treatment for mBC. Ten patients were previously exposed to Tmab and three to Pmab+Tmab for (neo)adjuvant treatment. At IRR onset, 21 patients (75%) had liver metastasis, with more than five liver metastases for 19 of them. Fifteen patients (55%) had liver enzymes upper normal limit. IRR occurred during first anti-HER2-mAb infusion in 22 patients (79%) despite pre-treatment with antihistaminic and/or glucosteroids for taxanes. The other IRR were reported at the 2nd, 5th, 6th, 8th and > 10th cycle of Pmab+Tmab. Sixteen IRR (57%) were attributed to Pmab infusion, 9 (32%) to Tmab infusion and 3 (11%) to Tmab and/or Pmab. Al IRR were declared to the pharmacovigilance agency. Majority of reactions were mild to moderate (54% of grade 2). Most frequent symptoms associated with IRR were: thrills (68%), hyperthermia (64%); low oxygen saturation (36%), pain (25%), hypotension (21%), cutaneous (18%) and digestive (18%) reaction. Three patients were transferred to ICU. One death was attributed to anti-HER2 mAb IRR (death was attributed to respiratory distress during the first Tmab infusion). Reintroduction off Pmab+Tmab was performed in 18 patients, after pre-treatment with antihistaminic and/or glucosteroids and with vital function monitoring in conventional hospitalization. No recurrence of IRR was observed in 15/18 patients. For the 3 patients with recurrent IRR, symptoms were mild to moderate. Objective response to anti-HER2 treatments was observed in twenty three patients (82%; 8 complete responses; 15 partial responses). Median PFS was 16 months. CONCLUSIONS: Most anti-Her2-mAb IRR occurs during first infusion, are mild to moderate and do not require a transfer in ICU. Our study suggests that patients with high liver burden might be over-represented among those experiencing an IRR. Reintroduction of Pmab+Tmab was safe in most patients, allowing the continuation of the anti-HER2 dual blockade. Citation Format: Delphine Loirat, Juliette Logeart, Pauline Vaflard, Aurélien Noret, Mathilde Saint-Ghislain, Edith Borcoman, Audrey Hurgon, Cyrille Cros, Thomas Genevee, Audrey Bellesoeur, Francesco Ricci, Florence Lerebours, Laurence Escalup, Marie-Paule Sablin, François-Clément Bidard, Paul H. Cottu, Jean-Yves Pierga. Infusion-related reactions in patients receiving pertuzumab and trastuzumab: A retrospective study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-27.

Tolerability and Safety of Switching from Rituximab to Ocrelizumab: Evaluating Factors Associated with Infusion Related Reactions.

BackgroundOcrelizumab and rituximab are frequently used treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS). Data on switching from rituximab to ocrelizumab is limited.ObjectivesTo assess the frequency, severity, and factors of infusion related reactions (IRRs) in patients with MS who switch from rituximab to ocrelizumab, compared to those who stay on rituximab.MethodsProspective study on MS patients aged 18–65, on rituximab for at least 2 cycles, who either switched to ocrelizumab (switch group) or stayed on rituximab (comparator group) (n = 100 each). Participants were followed for IRRs, safety, and tolerability over 12 months.ResultsThe proportion of IRRs in patients who continue on rituximab (14%) were similar to those who switched to ocrelizumab on Day 1 (14%; p = 1.000) and Week 24 (12%; p = 0.647) but higher than at Day 15 (4%; 0.005). The risk of IRRs for the switch group was associated with the presence of B cells (CD19 and/or CD20 counts ≥1%) increasing by 5.01 (1.49, 16.82) times on Day 1 (p = 0.007). Antidrug antibodies to ocrelizumab were not associated with IRRs. No other safety concerns were identified in switching to ocrelizumab.ConclusionIRRs are similar between both groups, which suggests that it is safe to switch from rituximab to ocrelizumab.

Pretreatment with ibrutinib reduces cytokine secretion and limits the risk of obinutuzumab-induced infusion-related reactions in patients with CLL: analysis from the iLLUMINATE study

Anti-CD20 antibody treatments, such as obinutuzumab, have been associated with infusion-related reactions (IRRs). In the phase 3 iLLUMINATE study of ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab in first-line chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, IRRs were substantially reduced with ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. We prospectively analyzed inflammatory cytokines to evaluate the impact of ibrutinib on circulating cytokine levels following obinutuzumab infusion. In iLLUMINATE, ibrutinib or chlorambucil was given approximately 30–120 min before the first obinutuzumab infusion. Cytokines evaluated were IFNγ, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-18, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, and TNFα. Changes in peak cytokine levels from baseline (immediately before obinutuzumab) to post-obinutuzumab infusion were compared between arms and between patients with versus without IRRs using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Of 228 treated patients, 95 on ibrutinib-obinutuzumab (15 with IRRs, 80 without) and 88 on chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (45 with IRRs, 43 without) with cytokine data were included. Irrespective of IRR occurrence, median increase in cytokines was lower with ibrutinib-obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab for all cytokines (P < 0.01) except MIP-1β. Across treatment arms, post-obinutuzumab median increase in all cytokines except MIP-1β was greater in patients with versus without IRRs (P < 0.001). IL-6 and IL-8 elevations were associated with IRRs in both treatment arms. Among patients with IRRs, those receiving ibrutinib-obinutuzumab had lower post-obinutuzumab increases in IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and MCP-1 (P < 0.04) than patients receiving chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. For patients in the ibrutinib-treatment arm, we observed a reduction in both the rate of clinically apparent IRRs and the levels of IRR-related cytokines and chemokines. This observation supports an immunomodulatory mechanism of action for ibrutinib. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02264574

Mast cell stabilizers in management of IgE independent mast cell activation in infusion related reactions in patients with Fabry disease

Mast cell stabilizers in management of IgE independent mast cell activation in infusion related reactions in patients with Fabry disease

Efficacy and tolerability of infliximab retreatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background:A large proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) relapse after drug discontinuation despite achieving a stable state of infliximab-induced clinical remission. Resuming the use of the same tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors in patients who relapse following TNF-α inhibitor discontinuation was suggested as a treatment strategy. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab retreatment in patients with IBD.Methods:A systematic literature search to shortlist relevant studies was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and SCOPUS databases for studies published from inception to August 2020.Results:Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled clinical remission rate of infliximab retreatment in patients with IBD was 85% (95% confidence interval (CI), 81–89%) for induction treatment and 73% (95% CI, 66–80%) for maintenance treatment. A clinical remission rate following infliximab reintroduction was achieved in a greater proportion of patients with Crohn’s disease (87%; 95% CI, 83–91%) than in those with ulcerative colitis (78%; 95% CI, 61–91%) for induction treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant. Infusion-related reactions after infliximab retreatment occurred in 9% of patients with IBD (95% CI, 3–16%).Conclusion:Infliximab retreatment showed high clinical remission rates with tolerable infusion-related reactions in patients with IBD who achieved remission with initial infliximab treatment but relapsed after its discontinuation. We suggest infliximab as a viable alternative in patients with IBD who previously responded well to infliximab treatment.

Utilizing a novel four-drug regimen to reduce the incidence of infusion-related reactions for first-dose rituximab infusions: An institutional review of rituximab infusion-related reactions in lymphoma patients.

e19148 Background: Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody utilized in the treatment of several disease states including B-cell non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. Infusion-related reactions (IRR) with rituximab occur with an incidence of up to 77% during the first infusion. The occurrence of an infusion reaction adds to the cost and time of rituximab administrations, especially with prolonged chair time and increased nursing and physician support, and decreased quality of life. The University of Arizona Cancer Center (AZCC) initiated a four-drug premedication regimen consisting of dexamethasone, famotidine, diphenhydramine, and acetaminophen. Our study examined the frequency of first-dose rituximab infusion reactions with our premedication regimen as compared to other published regimens. Methods: A retrospective chart review for all first-dose rituximab infusions was conducted for lymphoma patients treated with BR or RCHOP regimens from 11/2013 through 6/2019 at the AZCC. Data points collected included baseline patient demographics as well as rituximab infusion data. Results: In our study, the median age of the patient population was 64 years (range 22-89), 60.5% were males, and the average BSA was 2 m2 (range 1.39-3.04). The average rituximab dose was 750 mg (range 521-1140) and the average infusion time was 301 minutes (range 197-512). IRR with first time Rituximab was seen in 19 patients out of 81 total patients (23.5%). Of these IRR, 52.6% occurred in BR versus 47.4% in RCHOP. The most frequent IRR symptoms seen included flushing, itching, feeling hot, and tingling. The average infusion time for IRR patients was 334 minutes versus 284 minutes in patients not experiencing IRR. Grade 2 reactions were reported in 14 patients (73.7%) with grade 3 IRR’s reported in 5 patients (26.3%). Onset of IRR occurred on average during the first 61.6 minutes of the start of infusion (range 10-108 minutes). Conclusions: A novel four drug premedication regimen consisting of corticosteroids, antihistamines H2RA antatagonist and analgesic, resulted in a much lower rituximab infusion reaction rate (23.5%) than what has been previously reported in literature using standard premedications ( &gt; 50%). The utilization of this four drug combination therapy provides the means to reduce first dose rituximab IRR in patients while maximizing patient care and increasing the number of patients who were able to receive Rapid Rituximab during their next cycle of chemotherapy.

A Single Center Retrospective Evaluation of Daratumumab Infusion Related Reactions with Split-First Dose Day 1 and Day 2 Infusion

Introduction:Monoclonal antibody's infusion related reactions (IRRs) include anaphylaxis, anaphylactoid reactions and cytokine release syndrome. These reactions are related to the time of infusion. Incidence of IRRs in patients treated with daratumumab is reported to be about 42%. Severity of the most commonly reported IRRs, during the first dose of infusion are between grade I and II. Approved dosage of daratumumab is 16 mg/kg IV weekly given for 1 through 8 weeks, then every 2 weeks from 9th through 24th week, after which it is given every 4 weeks from 25th week onwards, its use is continued until disease progression. The goal of this study is to evaluate the IRRs at cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1) and C1D2, using split dose daratumumab (8 mg/kg) and to look for the impact of prior leukotriene receptor antagonist administration on the incidence of IRRs.Methods:To study the IRRs at day 1 using split dose daratumumab C1D1 (8 mg/kg) and C1D2 (8 mg/kg), we performed a retrospective review of medical records of relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma patients receiving daratumumab between December 1st, 2015 to March 31st, 2018 at our center. Key variables related to each patient were recorded from Epic electronic database. Data were summarized using counts and percentages.Results:A total of 35 patients were included and the incidence of IRRs was measured. Overall, 13 (37.14%) patients developed IRRs on day 1. Out of these 13 patients, 11 (84.61%) patients had grade II IRRs, 1 (7.69%) patient had grade I IRRs and 1 (7.69%) patient had grade III IRRs.Nineteen (54.2%) patients out of a total 35 patients were pretreated with montelukast; out of these 19 patients, 5 (26.31%) patients had grade II IRRs and 1 (5.26%) patient had grade III IRRs. Thus, 31.57% patients had IRRs with montelukast pretreatment. No patient had grade I or grade IV IRRs.Sixteen (45.71%) patients out of total 35 patients were not pretreated with Montelukast; out of these 16 patients, 6 (37.5%) patients had grade II IRRs and 1 (6.25%) patient had grade I IRR. No patient had grade III or grade IV IRR. Thus, 43.75% patients had IRRs without montelukast. Overall, 12.18% reduction in IRRs was noted with pretreatment using montelukast.Conclusion:This single center study demonstrates that split dose model of daratumumab in the treatment of R/R multiple myeloma shows lower incidence of IRRs when compared to historical controls reported in the literature. Moreover, pretreatment with leukotriene receptor antagonist also appear to decreases the incidence of IRRs in our patient population. Future randomized prospective trials are needed to support these findings and improving the overall impact on tolerance for daratumumab. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Ensemble-plus Study Design: An Investigation of Shortened Ocrelizumab Infusion Time on Infusion-related Reactions in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis from the Phase Iiib Ensemble-plus Study

Ensemble-plus Study Design: An Investigation of Shortened Ocrelizumab Infusion Time on Infusion-related Reactions in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis from the Phase Iiib Ensemble-plus Study

Infusion-related reactions in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II on idursulfase enrolled in the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS)

Cerebral folate deficiency (CFD) syndromes are defined as neuro-psychiatric conditions with low CSF folate and attributed to different causes such as autoantibodies against the folate receptor-alpha (FR) protein that can block folate transport across the choroid plexus, FOLR1 gene mutations or mitochondrial disorders. High-dose folinic acid treatment restores many neurologic deficits.Among 36 patients from 33 families the infantile-onset CFD syndrome was diagnosed based on typical clinical features and low CSF folate. All parents were healthy. Three families had 2 affected siblings, while parents from 4 families were first cousins.We analysed serum FR autoantibodies and the FOLR1 and FOLR2 genes. Among three consanguineous families homozygosity mapping attempted to identify a monogenetic cause. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed in the fourth consanguineous family, where two siblings also suffered from polyneuropathy as an atypical finding.Boys (72%) outnumbered girls (28%). Most patients (89%) had serum FR autoantibodies fluctuating over 5–6 weeks. Two children had a genetic FOLR1 variant without pathological significance. Homozygosity mapping failed to detect a single autosomal recessive gene. WES revealed an autosomal recessive polynucleotide kinase 3´phosphatase (PNKP) gene abnormality in the siblings with polyneuropathy.Infantile-onset CFD was characterized by serum FR autoantibodies as its predominant pathology whereas pathogenic FOLR1 gene mutations were absent. Homozygosity mapping excluded autosomal recessive inheritance of any single responsible gene. WES in one consanguineous family identified a PNKP gene abnormality that explained the polyneuropathy and also its contribution to the infantile CFD syndrome because the PNKP gene plays a dual role in both neurodevelopment and immune-regulatory function. Further research for candidate genes predisposing to FRα-autoimmunity is suggested to include X-chromosomal and non-coding DNA regions.

Assessment of Measures to Reduce Infusion-Related Reactions in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated with Obinutuzumab in the GREEN Study

Assessment of Measures to Reduce Infusion-Related Reactions in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated with Obinutuzumab in the GREEN Study

Role of CD20 expression and other pre-treatment risk factors in the development of infusion-related reactions in patients with CLL treated with obinutuzumab

Role of CD20 expression and other pre-treatment risk factors in the development of infusion-related reactions in patients with CLL treated with obinutuzumab

Risk Factors Associated with the Development of Infusion-Related Reactions in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Treated with Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies: Analysis of the CLL11 Study Dataset

Background: The administration of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in patients with B-cell lympho-proliferative disorders is frequently accompanied by a constellation of signs and symptoms that have been labelled as infusion-related reactions (IRR). The pathophysiology of IRR remains poorly understood as do predictors of risk, which may relate to the mechanism of action of the anti-CD20, disease-related factors such as tumour burden or host factors such as polymorphisms of Fc gamma receptor 3A (FcγRIIIA).In the CLL11 trial (NCT01010061), patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and comorbidities were randomised to receive either rituximab (type I anti-CD20 mAb) or obinutuzumab (type II and glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb) in combination with chlorambucil for six cycles. Obinutuzumab led to faster depletion of B cells and achieved an improvement in outcome parameters such as response and progression-free survival compared with the rituximab arm, but was also associated with a higher rate and increased severity of IRR. To better understand the profile of risk for IRR in patients with CLL, we performed an exploratory analysis on data obtained from patients treated with either one of the two antibodies given in combination with chlorambucil.Methods: Patients from the prospective, randomized Phase III CLL11 study who received a first infusion of obinutuzumab (N=331) or rituximab (N=326) were included. Baseline pre-treatment risk factors thought to play a possible role in the development of IRR were identified a priori and included patient demographics, concurrent conditions and premedications, parameters of disease burden, prognostic factors, laboratory variables and FcγR genotype. Baseline values for mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD20, gated on the circulating CLL clone, and MFI of CD16, gated on the natural killer (NK) cell population (CD56+16+) in peripheral blood were also available for N=510 patients. The primary outcome, development of an IRR with the first infusion, was defined as the occurrence of related signs and symptoms during or within 24 hours of administration of antibody. Due to the short-term nature of the initial IRR a multivariate logistical regression analysis was performed rather than a time to event analysis. Internal validation of this model, derived from a single dataset, was conducted using the established resampling technique of bootstrapping. This assessed the proportion of times each variable retained significance at α=0.10 when the model was fitted to bootstrapped samples of the dataset.Results: Patients that appeared to be at greater risk of developing any grade of IRR with the first infusion of rituximab or obinutuzumab were those treated with obinutuzumab, those with higher surface expression CD20 on CLL cells (MFI CD20) and greater FcγRIIIA (MFI CD16) on NK cells in peripheral blood, those with higher affinity FcγRIIIA genotype (VV), more pronounced neutropenia and splenomegaly at baseline (Table 1). Higher baseline absolute lymphocyte count and the presence of respiratory comorbidity also appeared to increase risk. All variables significant for inclusion in the model are shown in Table 1. Looking at those patients treated with obinutuzumab only, the most important determinant of risk was MFI CD20 (OR 3.6 95% CI 1.6-7.9). The impact of glucocorticoid premedication in reducing risk in obinutuzumab treated patients was not sufficient to reach significance, however, patients were not randomised to this intervention.Conclusion: This work identifies novel disease- and patient-specific biological variables that appear to play a role in the development of IRR in patients with CLL treated with anti-CD20 mAb, although the treatment received (obinutuzumab >rituximab) confers greatest risk. In addition to parameters of tumour burden, target antigen expression and gene polymorphisms of FcγR also appear to contribute to the risk of developing an IRR. Our results support the hypothesis that higher rates of IRR seen with the administration of obinutuzumab may result from stronger activation upon binding to CD20 on leukemic cells and subsequent enhanced cross-linking between CD20 expressing leukemic cells and FcγRIIIA bearing effector cells. Further studies involving obinutuzumab in this patient population will be needed to externally validate the results of this exploratory analysis. [Display omitted] DisclosuresFreeman:Roche Pharmaceuticals: clinical research fellowship supported by Roche Pharmaceuticals (secondment from Bart’s) Other. Dixon:Roche Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Houghton:Roche Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Humphrey:Roche: Employment. Fingerle-Rowson:Roche Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Kreuzer:Roche Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Engelke:Roche: Travel grants Other. Hallek:Roche Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Goede:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel grants Other.