Infusion-related Adverse Events Research Articles

Rituximab is a safe and effective alternative treatment for patients with autoimmune hepatitis: Results from the ColHai registry.

Small series suggest that rituximab could be effective as treatment for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), although data are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in different cohorts of patients with AIH. Multicentre retrospective analysis of the 35 patients with AIH and its variant forms treated with rituximab and included in the ColHai registry between 2015 and 2023. Most patients were female (83%), 10 (29%) had cirrhosis and four (11.4%) variant forms of AIH. Indication for rituximab were as follows: 14(40%) refractory AIH, 19(54%) concomitant autoimmune or haematological disorder, 2(6%) intolerance to prior treatments. In three (9%) subjects with a concomitant disorder, rituximab was the first therapy for AIH. Overall, 31 (89%) patients achieved or maintained complete biochemical response (CBR), including the three in first-line therapy. No difference in CBR was observed according to rituximab indication (refractory AIH 86% vs. concomitant disorders 90%, p = .824) or cirrhosis (80% vs. 92%, p = .319). Rituximab was associated with a significant reduction in corticosteroids (median dose: prior 20 vs. post 5 mg, p < .001) and the discontinuation of ≥1 immunosuppressant in 47% of patients. Flare-free rate at 1st, 2nd and 3rd year was 86%, 73% and 62% respectively. Flares were not associated with the development of liver failure and were successfully managed with repeated doses of rituximab and/or increased corticosteroids. Three (9%) patients experienced infusion-related adverse events (1 anaphylaxis and 2 flu-like symptoms) and five (14%) infections. Rituximab is safe and effective in patients with refractory AIH and those treated due to concomitant autoimmune or haematological disorders.

Chinese expert consensus on the management of clinical pathway and adverse events of trastuzumab deruxtecan (2024 edition)

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is one of the new generation antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) with bystander effect. T-DXd can not only significantly improve the survival of HER-2-positive advanced breast cancer patients, but also enable advanced breast cancer patients with low HER-2 expression to benefit from HER-2-targeted therapy. T-DXd has been approved by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) for the treatment of HER-2-positive or HER-2-low breast cancer patients. It is foreseeable that T-DXd will be widely used in clinical practice in the future. However, T-DXd has also shown different safety characteristics compared to previous HER-2 targeted drugs in clinical trials. How to manage T-DXd adverse events more reasonably and fully utilize the efficacy of T-DXd is an urgent clinical problem. Based on the existing clinical evidence and guideline consensus, combined with clinical practice experience, the expert group finally reached the consensus of clinical care pathway and adverse reaction management of trastuzumab deruxtecan after many discussions. This consensus content includes the clinical use method of T-DXd, pre-treatment patient education, and management of common or noteworthy adverse events of T-DXd. The adverse events include infusion related adverse events, digestive system adverse events (nausea/vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, and decreased appetite), hematological adverse events (neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia), respiratory adverse events (interstitial lung disease/pneumonia), cardiovascular adverse events (decreased left ventricular ejection fraction), adverse events in liver function (elevated transaminases) and other common adverse events (alopecia, fatigue, etc). This consensus focuses on the prevention of adverse events, dose adjustment and treatment when adverse events occur, and recommendations for patients' lifestyle, aiming to improve clinicians' understanding of T-DXd and provide practical guidance for clinical oncologists on T-DXd clinical management.

Assessment of 2% vs 3% Peripheral Hypertonic Sodium Chloride Administration and Its Impact on Safe and Timely Treatment

Abstract Objectives Evaluate if peripheral administration of 3% hypertonic saline (HTS) provides timely treatment with a rate of infusion-related adverse events at or below what is reported in the literature. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective study conducted in a large academic medical center in New York City. Eligible patients were inpatients receiving either 2% or 3% HTS for severe hyponatremia, elevated intracranial pressure, or cerebral edema. The primary outcome was incidence of infusion-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints included achievement of appropriate sodium correction, incidence of over-correction, length of time from ordering to medication administration, and incidence of osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS). Main Results A total of 199 patients were included in analysis (85 in the 3% HTS group and 114 in the 2% HTS group). No difference was found between groups for rate of infusion related adverse events or incidence of sodium overcorrection groups (0 vs 1 [0.9%]; p = 0.39). Significantly more patients in the 3% HTS group received intermittent administration (p &lt; 0.001), whereas more patients in the 2% HTS group received a continuous infusion (p &lt; 0.001). There were no reports of ODS in either group. No difference in length of time to administration was found between groups. Conclusion Our study, one of the largest to evaluate peripheral administration of 3% HTS, found that it is not associated with an increase in infusion related adverse events or sodium overcorrection versus 2% HTS. Peripheral administration should be recommended to provide timely treatment for patients requiring HTS.

Mesenchymal stromal cells plus basiliximab improve the response of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease as a second-line therapy: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial

BackgroundFor patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD), effective second-line regimens are urgently needed. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been used as salvage regimens for SR-aGVHD in the past. However, clinical trials and an overall understanding of the molecular mechanisms of MSCs combined with basiliximab for SR-aGVHD are limited, especially in haploidentical haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT).MethodsThe primary endpoint of this multicentre, randomized, controlled trial was the 4-week complete response (CR) rate of SR-aGVHD. A total of 130 patients with SR-aGVHD were assigned in a 1:1 randomization schedule to the MSC group (receiving basiliximab plus MSCs) or control group (receiving basiliximab alone) (NCT04738981).ResultsMost enrolled patients (96.2%) received HID HSCT. The 4-week CR rate of SR-aGVHD in the MSC group was obviously better than that in the control group (83.1% vs. 55.4%, P = 0.001). However, for the overall response rates at week 4, the two groups were comparable. More patients in the control group used ≥ 6 doses of basiliximab (4.6% vs. 20%, P = 0.008). We collected blood samples from 19 consecutive patients and evaluated MSC-derived immunosuppressive cytokines, including HO1, GAL1, GAL9, TNFIA6, PGE2, PDL1, TGF-β and HGF. Compared to the levels before MSC infusion, the HO1 (P = 0.0072) and TGF-β (P = 0.0243) levels increased significantly 1 day after MSC infusion. At 7 days after MSC infusion, the levels of HO1, GAL1, TNFIA6 and TGF-β tended to increase; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Although the 52-week cumulative incidence of cGVHD in the MSC group was comparable to that in the control group, fewer patients in the MSC group developed cGVHD involving ≥3 organs (14.3% vs. 43.6%, P = 0.006). MSCs were well tolerated, no infusion-related adverse events (AEs) occurred and other AEs were also comparable between the two groups. However, patients with malignant haematological diseases in the MSC group had a higher 52-week disease-free survival rate than those in the control group (84.8% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.031).ConclusionsFor SR-aGVHD after allo-HSCT, especially HID HSCT, the combination of MSCs and basiliximab as the second-line therapy led to significantly better 4-week CR rates than basiliximab alone. The addition of MSCs not only did not increase toxicity but also provided a survival benefit.

Taliglucerase alfa in the longterm treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 Gaucher disease: the Albanian experience.

Enzyme replacement therapy is already recognized as the gold standard of care for patients with Gaucher disease. Taliglucerase alfa is one of the three alternatives recommended for treatment of Gaucher disease in children and adults. This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of Taliglucerase alfa in children and adolescents with Type 1 Gaucher disease. Over a six-year period, we monitored the efficacy of continuous treatment in 10 patients by assessing various parameters, including hemoglobin concentration, platelet count, liver and spleen volume, bone mineral density, glucosylsphingosine level, chitotriosidase activity, and growth parameters. Safety was evaluated by immunogenicity and adverse event monitoring. The mean age of patients was 13.4 ± 3.6 years and the treatment duration was 60.24 ± 13.4 months. From baseline to end line the parameters change as follows: hemoglobin concentration improved from 12.7 (±1.3) to 14.6 (±1.5) and platelet count from 180 (±74) to 198 (±79). The spleen volume, was reduced by 46% (p = 0,007). The chitotriosidase activity decreased from 4,019.7 (±3,542.0) nmoles/ml/hr to 2,039.5 (±1,372.2) nmoles/ml/hr (46% reduction). Glucoylsphingosine level dropped from 119.2 (±70.4) ng/ml to 86.2 (±38.1) ng/ml, indicating a reduction of 28%. Bone mineral density Z-score, improved from -1.47 (±1.76) to -0.46 (±0.99) (69.7% reduction). Out of the 1,301 total administrations, our patients reported only 37 (2.8%) infusion-related adverse events which were mild and transitory. Taliglucerase alfa exhibits good efficacy and a safe profile in the treatment of children and adolescents with Type 1 Gaucher disease.

Patient preference, efficacy, and compliance with zoledronic acid for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in patients with autoimmune diseases.

We evaluated the preference, patient satisfaction, and efficacy of zoledronic acid compared with oral bisphosphonates (BPs) for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) in patients with autoimmune diseases. We enrolled 50 patients with new fractures or osteoporosis detected on follow-up bone densitometry after at least 1year of oral BP use among patients diagnosed with GIOP during treatment for autoimmune diseases. After 1year of zoledronic acid treatment, patients completed a survey for preference and satisfaction assessment. Treatment efficacy was analysed by comparing bone mineral density changes and fractures with those in a control group of patients who continued oral BP use. Age, sex, treatment duration, and medication history did not differ significantly between the two groups. Among the participants, 86.7% preferred and were more satisfied with intravenous zoledronic acid than with oral BPs, primarily because of the convenience of its administration interval. Only two patients (4%) reported infusion-related adverse events with zoledronic acid. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in the annualized percentage change in the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femur neck, and hip between patients receiving zoledronic acid and those receiving oral BPs. The occurrence of new fractures was consistent across both groups, with two cases in each, showing no significant differences. Patients showed a preference for and greater satisfaction with zoledronic acid, and its efficacy in treating osteoporosis was comparable to that of oral BPs. Therefore, zoledronic acid is a suitable treatment option for GIOP in patients with autoimmune diseases.

Cross-Reactivity of Antibodies to Rituximab with Other Therapeutic Anti-CD20 Antibodies.

One reason for a lack of response to rituximab as well as infusion-related anaphylactic adverse events is the development of antidrug Abs to rituximab. Besides rituximab, a number of other therapeutic Abs targeting CD20 are nowadays available as alternatives. In this study, we investigated the potential cross-reactivity of (human) anti-rituximab Abs to three other anti-CD20 mAbs: ofatumumab, obinutuzumab, and ocrelizumab. In 25 cases of anti-rituximab Abs, cross-reactivity was examined using both direct binding assays and inhibition immunoassays. Although no cross-reactivity was observed to ofatumumab or obinutuzumab, 8 of 25 samples also showed reactivity toward ocrelizumab in at least one of the two assays. Furthermore, in three cases of anti-ocrelizumab Abs, cross-reactivity to rituximab was observed in an inhibition immunoassay, albeit not in a direct binding assay. Our results suggest that obinutuzumab or ofatumumab are safe anti-CD20 alternatives in case of the presence of anti-rituximab Abs. It is advisable to proceed cautiously if switching from rituximab to ocrelizumab (or vice versa) is considered in case these alternatives may not be available.

Intravenous administration of umbilical cord lining stem cells in left ventricular assist device recipients: Results of the uSTOP LVAD BLEED pilot study

PurposeLeft ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation improves survival in advanced heart failure. Despite this, angiodysplastic bleeding complications remain a significant driver of costs as well as morbidity. Mechanisms implicated in post LVAD implant bleeding include the dysregulation of angiogenic factors seen in this population. The present pilot study evaluates the safety of umbilical cord lining stem cells (ULSCs) in LVAD recipients while exploring any early evidence of efficacy to improve bleeding. MethodsIn a 3 + 3 design, 9 patients received an intravenous (IV) infusion of ULSCs at escalating doses. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, secondary exploratory outcomes included antibodies against hemoglobin to quantify the amount of blood in stool without need for dietary restriction. ResultsThe primary safety and tolerability outcomes were met as no infusion related adverse events or toxic responses were observed. There was no sensitization after administration of ULSCs as assessed by panel reactive antibody. An increase in Angiopoetin-1 levels and a decrease in Angiopoetin-2 levels from baseline to 30 days were observed in 4 patients. Quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Test suggested a decrease in the mean blood content of stool from baseline to 30 days. ConclusionsIn this first ever IV administration of ULSCs in LVAD patients, infusion was noted to be safe and tolerable and did not cause immune sensitization. Half of the patients were noted to have angiogenic stabilization, and there was a trend towards decreasing amounts of blood noted in the stool, suggesting an early signal of efficacy.

Ironing out the Wrinkles: Low Molecular Weight Iron Dextran and Premedications

Intravenous (IV) iron infusion increases hemoglobin levels and reduces the need for transfusions compared to oral iron in patients with iron deficiency. Low molecular weight iron dextran (LMW ID) has a boxed warning for anaphylactic-type infusion reactions and premedication is commonly given. However, a recent multi-institution cohort study showed similar rates of infusion-related adverse events (AEs) with iron sucrose (4.3%) and iron dextran (3.8%), and a 23-fold higher incidence of AEs among those who received premedication compared with those who did not (38.6% vs 1.7%). There is currently a national shortage of iron dextran. A study during a previous iron dextran shortage in 2016 showed that the increased use of newer IV iron formulations persisted even once the shortage ended. This may in part be due to the concern for infusion reactions, but the use of these formulations comes at a significant cost. An analysis of the US FDA database showed that, based on differences in the average price of iron sucrose and LMW ID, the cost to prevent one life-threatening AE related to the use of LMW ID was estimated to be 5.0-7.8 million dollars. The cost to prevent one LMW ID-related death was estimated to be 33 million dollars. To further evaluate the incidence of infusion reactions and the use of premedication at the University of Kansas Medical Center, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who received their first ever infusion of iron dextran between 1/1/2021-12/31/2022. Infusion reactions were characterized as severe if hypoxia (O2&amp;lt;90%), hypotension (&amp;lt;100/80) or hospital admission occurred. Ninety-six patients were identified. 17 (17.7%) were males and 79 (82.3%) were females. There were 49 (51%) Caucasian, 26 (27.1%) African Americans, 12 (12.5%) Hispanic, and 9 (9.4%) others. 8 patients had infusion reaction (8.3%; 95% CI 4.0-15.1%) as determined by review of nursing documentation. Serious infusion reactions with LMW ID were rare (n=2, 2.1%), and neither patient required epinephrine administration nor hospitalization. Patients with history of allergies (n=61, 63.5%) had a higher incidence of AEs compared to those who did not (13.1% [95% CI, 6.4-23.2%] vs 0.0%, P = 0.022). This was even higher in 27 (28.1%) patients with 3 or more allergies (18.5% [95% CI, 7.4-35.9%] vs 0.0%, P = 0.019). In 71 (80.2%) patients who received premedication, there was a lower incidence of AEs compared to those who did not (3.9% vs 26.3%; χ2 = 10.02; P =0.007). The incidence of AEs was compared with individual premedication, and lower incidences were seen in 64 (66.7%) patients with diphenhydramine (3.1% vs 18.8%, χ2 = 6.82; P =0.015), 50 (52.1%) with methylprednisolone (2.0% vs 15.2%, χ2 = 5.48; P =0.022), and 46 (47.9%) with acetaminophen (0.0% vs 16%, χ2 = 8.03; P =0.004). Notably, a variety of premedication combinations and doses were used, indicating a lack of standardization even within a single institution. No patient who received acetaminophen experienced an infusion reaction. By contrast, there was no significant difference in patients receiving famotidine, suggesting that while acetaminophen may be a useful premedication, famotidine may not be beneficial. Further, our data strongly suggests that patients without a history of drug allergies do not require premedication. Our retrospective study demonstrates significant benefit to receiving premedication, which is divergent when compared to previous studies. This may be due to several reasons: the previously mentioned multi-center study included multiple formulations of IV iron, had a much lower rate of premedication (6% vs. 80%), and used a different definition of infusion reaction. In the multi-center cohort study, administration of medications post-iron infusion was used as a surrogate marker of reaction, while in our study it was based on review of nursing documentation. Both our study and the prior multi-center study noted an increased incidence of infusion reactions in patients with a history of allergies, and both demonstrated the rarity of serious reactions. Based on these results and the prior studies indicating the increased cost of other IV iron formulations, consideration of reinstitution of LMW ID with de-escalation of premedication in those without history of drug allergies should be considered once the current drug shortage resolves.

Evaluation of the Safety of Slow IV Push Versus Slow IV Infusion Administration of 23.4% Sodium Chloride.

Increased intracranial pressure due to cerebral edema is a medical emergency in which 23.4% sodium chloride (23.4% NaCl) may be a lifesaving intervention. Currently, safety data is limited on slow IV push (IVP) administration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of IVP administration of 23.4% NaCl and determine the number of infusion-related adverse events (IRAEs) compared to slow IV infusion (SIV) administration. We performed a retrospective review of patients who received a dose of 23.4% NaCl at the (removed institution) from January 2015 to June 2020 as either SIV over 30 minutes or IVP over 2-5 minutes. In total, 81 patients, 55 in the IVP group and 26 in the SIV group, were included in the analysis. There was a significantly faster time from order entry to dose completion (IVP 25 [13,58] vs SIV 73 [55,113] minutes, P < .001). There was no difference in IRAEs between the groups (IVP 17 [31%] vs SIV 6 [23%], P = .466). Hypotension was most common (IVP 13 [24%] vs SIV 5 [19%], P = .656) followed by bradycardia (IVP 6 [11%] vs SIV 1 [4%], P = .291). There were no extravasations reported. Overall, among a cohort of patients with cerebral edema, we found no difference in the incidence of IRAEs between SIV and IVP administration of 23.4% NaCl, and found a faster time to complete administration fssor the latter. In emergent scenarios where time may impact neurologic function, 23.4% NaCl administered IVP may be an alternative to SIV administration.

Safety and efficacy of biological agents in the treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

BackgroundTo determine the safety and efficacy of biological agents used in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in adults.MethodsSystematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines.Data sourcesMEDLINE (through Pubmed), EMBASE, Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov, Australianclinicaltrials.gov.au, ANZCTR.org.au and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for studies published from 20 May 2021 and 15 years prior. A grey literature search was performed and completed on 31 May 2021.Study criteriaPhase II, III or quasi randomised controlled trials, studies with only cerebral or cutaneous lupus were excluded. Data extraction: Two authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted, reviewed data for accuracy, and used the Cochrane tool to assess risk of bias.ResultsForty-four studies were identified, consisting of 15 groups of drugs and 25 different biological agents, totalling 16,889 patients. The main outcomes assessed included Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI), BILAG-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) and combined combined/partial renal remission (CRR/PRR).Four groups of biologics were found to improve outcomes. Anti-interferons: Anifrolumab increased BICLA response and SRI 5 to 8, decreased prednisone dosages, with increased herpes zoster infections, but fewer serious adverse events. Sifalimumab improved SRI but also increased herpes zoster infections. Anti BAFF/BLyS and/or APRIL: Belimumab consistently improved SRI 4, decreased prednisone dosages, increased combined CRR/PRR, and had no adverse safety outcomes. Tabalumab increased SRI 5 at 52 weeks with no steroid sparing effect but was associated with increased infusion related adverse events. Telitacicept improved SRI 4 at 52 weeks, with no increased adverse events, though data was rather sparse. Anti CD-20 monoclonal antibody, Obinutuzumab increased combined CRR/PRR at 1 and 2 years. Anti IL12/23 monoclonal antibody, Ustekinumab, increased SRI 4 to 6, but not BICLA at 24 weeks, with no concerning safety outcomes.ConclusionMultiple biologic agents are shown in high quality studies to have a significant therapeutic impact on outcomes in SLE.

Ofatumumab in Rituximab-Resistant and Rituximab-Intolerant Patients With Primary Membranous Nephropathy: A Case Series

Rituximab is the first-choice therapy for patients with primary membranous nephropathy (MN) and nephrotic syndrome. However, approximately 30% of patients are treatment-resistant or become treatment-intolerant with hypersensitivity reactions upon repeated drug exposures. We aimed to assess whether ofatumumab, a fully human second-generation anti-CD20 antibody, could be a valuable alternative to rituximab in this population. Case series. 7 rituximab-intolerant and 10 rituximab-resistant patients with MN who consented to receive ofatumumab (50-300mg, single intravenous infusion) and were followed at the nephrology unit of Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII (Bergamo, Italy) between September 2015 and January2019. Over a median (IQR) follow-up of 5.0 (3.0-9.8) months, all 7 rituximab-intolerant and 3 of the 10 rituximab-resistant patients exhibited complete (proteinuria<0.3g/d) or partial (proteinuria<3.5g/d with≥50% reduction vs baseline) remission of nephrotic syndrome. Circulating B cells were similarly depleted in all patients by 1 week, and serum anti-phospholipase A2 receptor antibody concentrations decreased to<2.7 relative units/mL in 3 of 4 rituximab-intolerant and 4 of 8 rituximab-resistant patients with phospholipase A2 receptor-related disease. Ofatumumab significantly reduced 24-hour urinary protein and immunoglobulin G excretion and increased serum albumin and immunoglobulin G levels. These effects were greater in rituximab-intolerant than in rituximab-resistant patients. Measured glomerular filtration rate significantly increased by an average of 13.4% at 24 months compared with baseline (P=0.036) among all patients in the series. There were 14 nonserious infusion-related adverse events in 9 patients that recovered with temporary infusion interruption. Retrospective design, limited number of patients. Ofatumumab may represent an effective and safe treatment for rituximab-intolerant cases of MN. Larger prospective studies will be needed to validate these preliminary findings and explore the effectiveness of other second-generation anti-CD20 antibodies in this clinical setting. Primary membranous nephropathy (MN) is one of the most frequent causes of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults. In this case series, we explored the efficacy of ofatumumab, a fully human second-generation anti-CD20 antibody, in 17 patients with MN and NS who were intolerant or unresponsive to rituximab. All 7 rituximab-intolerant patients exhibited complete or partial clinical remission, compared with only 3 of the 10 rituximab-resistant patients. Autoantibody levels decreased in all patients with phospholipase A2 receptor-related disease. Ofatumumab achieved a significant reduction in urinary protein and immunoglobulin G excretion while increasing serum albumin and immunoglobulin G levels. Ofatumumab may be a promising option for patients with MN who are rituximab-intolerant. Further investigations are warranted to validate these preliminary findings.

Real-World Experiences with Taliglucerase Alfa Home Infusions for Patients with Gaucher Disease: A Global Cohort Study.

Taliglucerase alfa is an enzyme replacement therapy approved for Gaucher disease. We assessed the duration/compliance/safety of such home infusions in commercial use in four countries where home infusion programs are available. The treatment duration/compliance study included 173 patients (Israel, 58; US, 61; Brazil, 48; Australia, 6) who received ≥1 taliglucerase alfa home infusion through 6/2021. The median age at home therapy initiation was 38 (range, 2-87) years; 58% were females. The median treatment duration (at home) was 2.7 (range, 0.04-9.0) years. The annual compliance rate was stable (≥95%) throughout the study period. A search of the Pfizer global safety database (through 6/2021), identified 19 adverse events (AEs) as related to "definite home use" and 14 to "possible home use" of taliglucerase alfa; 42.4% of these AEs were serious; none were fatal. Twelve serious AEs in five separate case reports were considered treatment related: one case of chest discomfort/pain and hypertension and one case of erythema associated with a toe blister, for which causality could not be excluded; pain in extremity; projectile vomiting and chills, alongside excessive eye blinking; and an infusion-related AE (pruritus). In conclusion, this real-life global study demonstrated that taliglucerase alfa home infusions are safe with high compliance rates.

CMV hyperimmune globulin as salvage therapy for recurrent or refractory CMV infection in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)-related morbidity and mortality. Treatment failure continues to be a major issue in patients with CMV infection due to both drug resistance and intolerance. This single-center brief retrospective analysis of a case series aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of CMV-hyperimmune globulin as salvage therapy for CMV infection in children undergoing HSCT. Fifteen pediatric patients received human CMV-specific immunoglobulin (CMVIG) between July 2018 and December 2021 as a salvage therapy for refractory or recurrent CMV infection. At the time of CMVIG prescription, eight children presented with recurrent CMV infection and seven with refractory CMV infection. The overall response rate was 67% at 50 days from the CMVIG administration [95% confidence interval (CI): 44-88]. Overall survival (OS) from CMVIG administration at 100 days was 87% (95% CI: 56-96), and OS from HSCT at 1 year was 80% (95% CI: 50-93). Four patients died, three unrelated to CMV infection and one due to CMV pneumonia. CMVIG as salvage therapy was well tolerated, and no infusion-related adverse events were observed.

#5215 OFATUMUMAB AS A RESCUE THERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH MEMBRANOUS NEPHROPATHY

Abstract Background and Aims Rituximab is the first-line treatment for patients with primary membranous nephropathy (MN) and nephrotic syndrome (NS) at high risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease. However, this drug is effective only in approximately two thirds of treated patients, and repeated rituximab infusions may be complicated by hypersensitivity reactions, which contraindicate retreatment. Ofatumumab, a fully human anti-CD20 antibody, could overcome these limitations. Method We retrospectively evaluated the response to a single 50–300 mg dose of intravenous ofatumumab in 17 MN patients referred to our institution who either experienced hypersensitivity reactions (rituximab-intolerant, n = 5) or failed to achieve NS remission after rituximab infusion (rituximab-resistant, n = 12). Results Over a median [IQR] follow-up of 5.0 [3.0-9.8] months, ten (58.8%) patients—five rituximab-resistant (41.7%) and all five rituximab-intolerant—achieved complete or partial NS remission, defined as proteinuria &amp;lt;0.3 g/day or proteinuria &amp;lt;3.5 g/day with ≥50% reduction from baseline, respectively. Ofatumumab infusion induced a progressive reduction in 24-hour urinary protein and IgG excretion, and a sharp increase in serum albumin and IgG levels. Peripheral B cells were depleted in all patients and started reconstituting by 3 months from baseline. Seven of the 12 subjects with PLA2R-related disease (i.e. with baseline anti-PLA2R antibody levels &amp;gt;2.7 RU/mL by ELISA) achieved antibody depletion during the follow-up (half of rituximab-resistant and all rituximab-intolerant). There were 14 non-serious infusion-related adverse events in nine patients, all of which completely resolved with temporary interruption of ofatumumab infusion. Conclusion Ofatumumab may be an effective and safe treatment option for all rituximab-intolerant and a substantial proportion of rituximab-resistant MN patients.

A pilot study of lymphodepletion intensity for peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived neoantigen-specific CD8 + T cell therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors

Currently, the optimal lymphodepletion intensity for peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived neoantigen-specific CD8 + T cell (Neo-T) therapy has yet to be determined. We report a single-arm, open-label and non-randomized phase 1 study (NCT02959905) of Neo-T therapy with lymphodepletion at various dose intensity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors that are refractory to standard therapies. The primary end point is safety and the secondary end points are disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS). Results show that the treatment is well tolerated with lymphopenia being the most common adverse event in the highest-intensity lymphodepletion groups. Neo-T infusion-related adverse events are only grade 1–2 in the no lymphodepletion group. The median PFS is 7.1 months (95% CI:3.7-9.8), the median OS is 16.8 months (95% CI: 11.9-31.7), and the DCR is 66.7% (6/9) among all groups. Three patients achieve partial response, two of them are in the no lymphodepletion group. In the group without lymphodepletion pretreatment, one patient refractory to prior anti-PD1 therapy shows partial response to Neo-T therapy. Neoantigen specific TCRs are examined in two patients and show delayed expansion after lymphodepletion treatment. In summary, Neo-T therapy without lymphodepletion could be a safe and promising regimen for advanced solid tumors.

Amphotericin B colloidal dispersion: an effective drug for the treatment of mucormycosis in China.

Mucormycosis has emerged as an increasingly important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients, but the effective drugs for the treatment are limited. Hence, the study aimed to summarize the characteristics of mucormycosis in patients with hematological malignancies, and investigate the efficacy and safety of Amphotericin B Colloidal Dispersion (ABCD) in treating mucormycosis. In this study, patients with mucormycosis complicated by hematological malignancies who received ABCD at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from April 2021 to May 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. The clinical data of the enrolled patients were collected, and then, the drug response at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and the end of treatment; the survival rate at 4, 8, and 12 weeks; and the laboratory-related indicators and adverse events (AEs) associated with ABCD were evaluated. In total, 9 patients with mucormycosis complicated by hematological malignancies were enrolled. The main symptoms were fever, cough, and chest pain. In addition, reversed halo signs (RHS) were found on chest CTs. The responses to ABCD at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and the end of treatment were 100% (9/9), 77.8% (7/9), and 77.8% (7/9), respectively. The survival rates of the patients at 4, 8, and 12 weeks were 77.8% (7/9), 66.7% (6/9), and 66.7% (6/9), respectively. Among laboratory-related indicators, white blood cell (WBC) counts were significantly increased from baseline after 1 and 2 weeks of ABCD treatment (P<0.05), whereas neutrophil counts were only increased significantly from baseline at 2 weeks post-treatment (P<0.05). The most common AEs were infusion-related AEs manifesting as fever, chills, and pruritus. Moreover, none of the patients suffered from renal injury once again. ABCD is a promising treatment strategy for patients with mucormycosis complicated by hematologic malignancies, showing remarkable efficacy and safety.

Ferric carboxymaltose versus standard-of-care oral iron to treat second-trimester anaemia in Malawian pregnant women: a randomised controlled trial

Anaemia affects 46% of pregnancies in Africa; oral iron is recommended by WHO but uptake and adherence are suboptimal. We tested a single dose of a modern intravenous iron formulation, ferric carboxymaltose, for anaemia treatment in Malawian pregnant women. In this open-label, individually randomised controlled trial, we enrolled women with a singleton pregnancy of 13-26 weeks' gestation in primary care and outpatient settings across two regions in southern Malawi. Women were eligible if they had capillary haemoglobin of less than 10·0 g/dL and negative malaria rapid diagnostic test. Participants were randomised by sealed envelope 1:1. Assessors for efficacy outcomes (laboratory parameters and birthweight) were masked to intervention; participants and study nurses were not masked. Participants were given ferric carboxymaltose up to 1000 mg (given once at enrolment in an outpatient primary care setting), or standard of care (60 mg elemental iron twice daily for 90 days), along with intermittent preventive malaria treatment. The primary maternal outcome was anaemia at 36 weeks' gestation. The primary neonatal outcome was birthweight. Analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat population for mothers and liveborn neonates, according to their randomisation group. Safety outcomes included incidence of adverse events during infusion and all adverse events from randomisation to 4 weeks' post partum. The trial is registered with ANZCTR, ACTRN12618001268235. The trial has completed follow-up. Between Nov 12, 2018, and March 2, 2021, 21 258 women were screened, and 862 randomly assigned to ferric carboxymaltose (n=430) or standard of care (n=432). Ferric carboxymaltose did not reduce anaemia prevalence at 36 weeks' gestation compared with standard of care (179 [52%] of 341 in the ferric carboxymaltose group vs 189 [57%] of 333 in the standard of care group; prevalence ratio [PR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·81 to 1·06; p=0·27). Anaemia prevalence was numerically lower in mothers randomly assigned to ferric carboxymaltose compared with standard of care at all timepoints, although significance was only observed at 4 weeks' post-treatment (PR 0·91 [0·85 to 0·97]). Birthweight did not differ between groups (mean difference -3·1 g [-75·0 to 68·9, p=0·93). There were no infusion-related serious adverse events or differences in adverse events by any organ class (including malaria; ≥1 adverse event: ferric carboxymaltose 183 [43%] of 430 vs standard of care 170 [39%] of 432; risk ratio 1·08 [0·92 to 1·27]; p=0·34). In this malaria-endemic sub-Saharan African setting, treatment of anaemic pregnant women with ferric carboxymaltose was safe but did not reduce anaemia prevalence at 36 weeks' gestation or increase birthweight. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-010612).

Cryopreservation of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Products During COVID-19 Pandemic: Graft Characterization and Engraftment Outcomes

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered the deployment of unfamiliar measures to safeguard successful allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Among these measures, cryopreservation offered logistical benefits that could outlast the pandemic, including graft availability and timely clinical service. The purpose of this study was to evaluate graft quality and hematopoietic reconstitution in patients transplanted with cryopreserved allogeneic stem cell products during the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated 44 patients who underwent allo-HCT using cryopreserved grafts consisting of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) apheresis (A) and bone marrow (BM) products at Mount Sinai Hospital. Comparative analyses of 37 grafts infused fresh during the one-year period preceding the pandemic were performed. Assessment of cellular therapy products included total nucleated cell and CD34+ cell enumeration, viability, and post-thaw recovery. The primary clinical endpoint was the evaluation of engraftment (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] and platelet count) and donor chimerism (presence of CD33+ and CD3+ donor cells) at day +30 and +100 post-transplant. Adverse events related to cell infusion were also analyzed. Patient characteristics were comparable between the fresh and cryopreserved groups with 2 exceptions in the HPC-A cohort: the number of patients in the cryopreserved group that received haploidentical grafts was 6 times that in the fresh group, and the number of patients in the fresh group with a Karnofsky performance score >90 was double that in the cryopreserved group. The quality of HPC-A and HPC-BM products was not affected by cryopreservation, and all grafts met the release criteria for infusion. The pandemic did not affect the time between collection and cryopreservation (median, 24 hours) and time in storage (median, 15 days). Median time to ANC recovery was significantly delayed in recipients of cryopreserved HPC-A (15 vs 11 days, P=.0121), and there was a trend toward delayed platelet engraftment (24 vs 19 days, P=.0712). The delay in ANC and platelet recovery was not observed when only matched graft recipients were compared. Cryopreservation did not affect the ability of HPC-BM grafts to engraft and reconstitute hematopoiesis, and there was no difference in the rates of ANC and platelet recovery. Achievement of donor CD3/CD33 chimerism was not affected by cryopreservation of either HPC-A or HPC-BM products. Graft failure was observed in only 1 case, a recipient of cryopreserved HPC-BM. Three recipients of cryopreserved HPC-A grafts died before ANC engraftment from infectious complications. Remarkably, 22% of our studied population had myelofibrosis, and almost half received cryopreserved HPC-A grafts with no graft failure observed. Finally, patients receiving cryopreserved grafts were at a higher risk of infusion-related adverse events than those receiving fresh grafts. Cryopreservation of allogeneic grafts results in adequate product quality with minimal impact on short-term clinical outcomes, except for an increased risk of infusion-related adverse events. Cryopreservation is a safe option in terms of graft quality and hematopoietic reconstitution with logistical benefits, but additional data are needed to determine long-term outcomes and assess whether this is a suitable strategy for at-risk patients.

Safety and efficacy of cladribine in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Previously, several studies investigated the effect of cladribine among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) as a treatment option. Due to the contradictory results of previous studies regarding the efficacy and safety of cladribine in the MS population, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis by including clinical trials and observational studies in terms of having more confirmative results to make a general decision. The three databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched in May 2022. We included the studies that investigated the efficacy and safety of cladribine in patients with MS. Eligible studies have to provide sufficient details on MS diagnosis and appropriate follow-up duration. We investigated the efficacy of cladribine with several outcomes including Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) change, progression-free survival (PFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and MRI-free activity survival (MFAS). After two-step reviewing, 23 studies were included in our qualitative and quantitative synthesis. The pooled SMD for EDSS before and after treatment was - 0.54 (95%CI: - 1.46, 0.39). Our analysis showed that the PFS after cladribine use is 79% (95%CI 71%, 86%). Also, 58% of patients with MS who received cladribine remained relapse-free (95%CI 31%, 83%). Furthermore, the MFAS after treatment was 60% (95%CI 36%, 81%). Our analysis showed that infection is the most common adverse event after cladribine treatment with a pooled prevalence of 10% (95%CI 4%, 18%). Moreover, the pooled prevalence of infusion-related adverse events was 9% (95%CI 4%, 15%). Also, the malignancies after cladribine were present in 0.4% of patients (95%CI 0.25%, 0.75%). Our results showed acceptable safety and efficacy for cladribine for the treatment of MS except in terms of reducing EDSS. Combination of our findings with the results of previous studies which compared cladribine to other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs), cladribine seems to be a safe and effective drug in achieving better treatment for relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients.