Influence Patient Preferences Research Articles

Stated Preferences of At-Risk Populations for the Treatment of Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review.

Poor adherence to anti-osteoporosis treatment is a well-recognized problem, partly due to misalignment with patient preferences. In recent years, several quantitative preference studies have been conducted. This study aimed to systematically review stated preference research to provide a comprehensive overview of patient preferences in osteoporosis, in particular on conditional relative attribute importance and preference heterogeneity. This systematic review was conducted in MEDLINE and Embase up to February 29th, 2024. It includes all English-language, peer-reviewed, stated preference articles related to osteoporosis management and treatment in patients with or at risk of osteoporosis. Conditional relative importance of attributes as well as heterogeneity was assessed, and attributes classified into outcome, process, and cost attributes. Quality assessment was performed using a combined checklist of Purpose, Respondents, Explanation, Findings, and Significance (PREFS) and International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) items. Fourteen studies including 4714 participants were evaluated. Attributes were mostly classified as process related (50%) and outcome related (40%), both of which significantly influence patient preferences. In pairwise attribute comparison, efficacy was dominant over cost, administration, and side-effects. Preference heterogeneity was observed in the majority of studies (86%). Quality assessment indicated an overall improvement in study quality over time, with recent studies adhering more closely to established methodological standards. The findings highlight the importance of considering patient preferences in the management of osteoporosis, underscoring the need for a patient-centered approach. The readiness of patients to engage in trade-offs between attributes suggests that healthcare providers should ensure treatments are aligned with individual patient preferences to improve adherence and optimize outcomes.

Patient preferences for preventive migraine treatments among Canadian adults: A discrete choice experiment.

To evaluate preferences for key attributes of injected or infused preventive migraine treatments and assess heterogeneity in preferences among Canadian participants with migraine. Current treatment options for migraine prevention differ in their attributes, including mode of administration, efficacy, and dosing frequency; preferences for such attributes can vary among patients. With the advent of new therapies, evidence demonstrating patient preferences for injected or infused preventive migraine treatments is necessary. Canadian adults self-reporting a diagnosis of migraine completed a cross-sectional, internet-based survey that included a discrete choice experiment. Participants were presented with attributes of preventive migraine treatments, including speed of onset, durability of efficacy, mode of administration, administration setting, and dosing frequency. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify subgroups of patients who differed in their treatment preferences. In total, 200 participants completed the survey. Participants' treatment preferences were most sensitive to improvements in the durability of effectiveness from "wears off 2 weeks before next dose" to "does not wear off before the next dose" (absolute difference in weights = |-0.95 to 1.07| = 2.02) and improvements from "cranial injections" to "intravenous infusions" (|-1.04 to 0.58| = 1.62); participants equally preferred self-injection and intravenous infusion from a health-care provider (mean weight = 0.58 and 0.47, respectively) as a route of administration over cranial injections (mean weight = -1.04). Three subgroups were identified with LCA: group one (n = 103) prioritized fast-acting and durable therapies, group two (n = 54) expressed aversion to cranial injections, and group three (n = 43) favored treatments administered in a health-care provider setting. In this sample of Canadian adults with migraine, we showed that durability of effectiveness and mode of administration are key attributes influencing patient preferences for preventive migraine treatments; however, certain groups of patients may differ in their treatment priorities. Our results highlight the need for patient-provider discussions regarding treatment attributes and consideration of patients' preferences when selecting a preventive migraine treatment.

The role of attachment and personality traits in choosing opiate addiction replacement therapy

Contemporary medical approaches for opioid addiction often include medication-assisted therapy, utilizing methadone and buprenorphine. However, factors influencing patient preferences for starting buprenorphine or methadone therapy are poorly understood. This study aims to explore whether variances in personality traits and attachment styles are related to treatment preferences among individuals undergoing buprenorphine and methadone maintenance therapies. 300 participants completed the Big Five Questionnaire for personality traits and sub-dimensions and the Experiences in Close Relationship Scale for assessing attachment styles. The results indicated that patients with higher levels of Dynamism, Conscientiousness, and Perseverance personality traits were more likely to choose buprenorphine over methadone for achieving and maintaining abstinence. Although attachment styles showed a greater ability to differentiate between groups compared to personality traits, the differences were not significant. However, Conscientiousness stood out for its high discriminant validity, suggesting that scores in this personality dimension could significantly distinguish between groups, with individuals in the buprenorphine group showing higher levels of Conscientiousness compared to the methadone group. The study suggests a partial association between individuals' preference for abstinence therapy and their personality traits. These findings could be considered useful indicators when choosing maintenance therapy to help opiate-addicted patients achieve and maintain abstinence.

Shifts in patient preference of third-line overactive bladder therapy after introduction of the implantable tibial nerve stimulator.

Third-line therapies for overactive bladder (OAB) that are currently recommended include intravesical Onabotulinumtoxin-A injections (BTX-A), percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), and sacral neuromodulation (SNM). The implantable tibial nerve stimulator (ITNS) is a novel therapy that is now available to patients with OAB. The objective of this study was to analyze shifts in patient preference of third-line therapies for OAB after introducing ITNS as an option amongthe previously established therapies for non-neurogenic OAB. A survey was designed and distributed via SurveyMonkey to the platform's audience of U.S. adults of age 18 and older. Screening questions were asked to include only subjectswho reported symptoms of OAB. Descriptions of current AUA/SUFU guideline-approved third-line therapies (BTX-A, PTNS, and SNM) were provided, and participants were asked to rank these therapies in order of preference (stage A). Subsequently, ITNS was introduced with a description, and participants were then asked to rank their preferences amongst current guideline-approved therapies and ITNS (stage B). Absolute and relative changes in therapy preferences between stage A and stage B were calculated. Associations between ultimate therapy choice in stage B and participant characteristics were analyzed. A total of 485 participants completed the survey (62.5% female). The mean age was 49.1 ± 36.5 years (SD). The most common OAB symptoms reported were urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) (73.0%) and urinary urgency (68.0%). 29.2% of patients had tried medication for OAB in the past, and 8.0%-10.3% of patients were previously treated with a third-line therapy for OAB. In stage A, participants ranked their first choice of third-line therapy as follows: 28% BTX-A, 27% PTNS, and 13.8% SNM. 26.6% of participants chose no therapy, and 4.5% chose all three equally. In stage B, participants ranked their first choice as follows: 27.6% BTX-A, 19.2% PTNS, 7.8% SNM, and 19.2% ITNS. 21.9% of participants chose no therapy and 4.3% chose all four equally as their first choice. There were both absolute and relative declines in proportions of patients interested in BTX-A, SNM, and PTNS as their first choice of third-line therapy with the introduction of ITNS. Patients originally interested in PTNS in stage A had the greatest absolute change after the introduction of ITNS with 7.8% of participants opting for ITNS in stage B. Those interested in SNM in stage A had the largest relative change in interest, with 43.5% of those originally interested in SNM opting for ITNS in stage B. Finally, with the introduction of ITNS, the number of participants initially not interested in any third-line therapy declined by an absolute change of 4.7% and relative change of 17.6%. Participants experiencing concurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptomswere more likely to choose a current guideline-approved third-line therapy than ITNS or no therapy at all (p = 0.047). Those who had prior experience with third-line therapies were more likely to choose a third-line therapy other than ITNS as their ultimate choice of therapy in stage B. Of those who had chosen a guideline-approvedthird-line therapy in stage B (not ITNS), 13.6% had prior experience with BTX-A, 14.7% with PTNS, and 32 (11.2%) with SNM (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.009, respectively). From our study, it appears that ITNS may attract a subset of patients who would not have otherwise pursued current guideline-approved third-line therapies for OAB. When patients are provided with descriptions of third-line OAB therapies including ITNS as an option, ITNS appears to compete with SNM and PTNS. It is possible that ITNS will provide patients with a different phenotype of neuromodulation therapy that can appeal to a niche OAB population. Given that ITNS devices have been introduced relativelyrecently to the market, their application will largely depend on cost and payer coverage, provider bias, and patient comorbidities. Further study is needed to understand how these factors interact with and influence patient preference of advanced OAB therapy to understand which patients will most benefit from this treatment modality.

Patient experience of telehealth appointments in head and neck cancer services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in rapid changes to head and neck cancer (HNC) services. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) face-to-face appointments were converted to telehealth appointments (telephone and video-call) to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission. The literature exploring HNC patient experience of these appointment types is limited. To explore patient experience of telehealth appointments at one UK centre during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the variables that may influence patient preference for virtual or face-to-face appointments. A survey-based study design was used, with closed questions and open text options to capture the views of the participants. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Open text data was used to add depth to the findings. A total of 23 participant surveys were returned. Six categories were identified: Usability; Information receiving & giving; Satisfaction; Emotions and comfort; Rapport; and Travel time and cost. Overall, participants gave positive responses to each category and indicated that telehealth appointments met their needs. Areas for clinical consideration are highlighted. Variables such as age, travel distance from hospital site, fear of COVID-19 and information technology (IT) access did not appear to influence patient preference for appointment type. Going forward, telehealth may be considered for use in combination with face-to-face appointments in the HNC pathway. Areas for further development include a 'telehealth screening tool' that may help to identify those patients most appropriate for these appointment types, or who require support to access them. What is already known on this subject The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in major disruption to HNC centres across the world. Services adapted to meet the needs of patients with many implementing telehealth into pathways. Studies exploring telehealth in speech and language therapy (SLT) services with the HNC population indicate positive results. It is clear telehealth has a role in modern healthcare and should not be viewed as a temporary solution to the pandemic. It is, however, recognized that embedding telehealth into pathways is not straightforward and requires ongoing review and evaluation, which includes patient and clinician perceptions. What this study adds to the existing knowledge The service evaluation gives insight into HNC patient experience of telehealth appointments for MDT clinics (led by SLT, dietician and clinical nurse specialist) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, patients report a positive experience of telehealth in the HNC pathway and are willing to accept this platform into their healthcare. Areas for clinical consideration are highlighted. What are the actual and clinical implications of this work? This findings of this service evaluation can be used to support the co-design of HNC pathways which embed telehealth as an option for patients. Areas that were important to the participants are highlighted; this includes the timing of telehealth appointments in the pathway, the need to meet the MDT face to face and the positive benefit of cost savings. The authors suggest a telehealth appointment screening tool as an area for future development.

Preferences of Patients with Congenital Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Other Chronic Conditions for in-Home Prophylactic Infusions

Background Congenital thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (cTTP) is an ultra-rare, life-threatening, thrombotic microangiopathy caused by an inherited deficiency of the von Willebrand factor (VWF)-cleaving enzyme ADAMTS13. Current treatment approaches include replacement therapy with intravenous (IV) infusions of either fresh frozen plasma, solvent/detergent-treated plasma, or factor VIII/VWF concentrates administered in a hospital/clinical setting. There is recent interest in novel treatments for cTTP and other chronic conditions where patients may be able to receive treatment at home with limited risk and a manageable safety profile compared to outpatient treatment. Understanding patient preferences regarding treatment at home vs an outpatient setting could help to inform approaches to patient care for both cTTP and other chronic conditions. Aims The primary objective was to assess stated preferences of patients with either cTTP or another chronic condition requiring treatment with regular IV infusions (listed in Table 1) toward prophylactic infusions administered at home vs in an outpatient setting. Secondary objectives were to estimate the utility and disutility of 7 attributes (listed in Table 2) associated with patient preferences and to assess whether clinical, sociodemographic, or other factors influence patient preferences. Methods This cross-sectional cohort study utilized an online discrete choice experiment survey, in which patients were presented with pairwise choice sets consisting of 7 attributes and their associated levels (listed in Table 2). In the survey, each patient was asked to choose their preferred alternative in a choice set (repeated 16 times) using different combinations of varying attribute levels for all 7 attributes, using an orthogonal experimental design. The survey also included a time trade-off exercise to enable the attribute levels to be adjusted for quality adjusted life years. The survey was conducted in France, Germany, Spain, the UK, and the US. Patients ≥18 years old with either cTTP or another chronic condition (listed in Table 1) who were receiving prophylactic IV infusions for ≥3 months, in either an outpatient setting or a hybrid outpatient and at-home setting, were eligible for inclusion. Treatment frequency ranged from once a week to once every 3 weeks. Data were analyzed using multinomial logit regression models. Results In total, 307 complete patient responses (France, n=18; Germany, n=95; Spain, n=96; UK, n=7; US, n=91) were included in the analyses. Median (range) age was 44.0 (20.0-78.0) years and 25 patients (8.1%) had cTTP ( Table 1). Overall, 137 patients (44.6%) reported an overall preference for receiving infusions at home, 85 patients (27.7%) reported a preference for receiving treatment in a hospital/clinic, and 85 patients (27.7%) reported a preference for receiving treatment via a hybrid outpatient and at-home setting. The majority of patients would prefer either a doctor or a nurse to administer their treatment at home (n=125, 40.7%). Patients placed significantly greater value on certain treatment-setting attributes ( Table 2); being comfortable with the treatment environment was considered the most important attribute. For the ‘convenience and impact on daily life’ attribute, selection of ‘flexibility in scheduling infusions’ was influenced by age (estimate: 0.019, 95% CI: 0.007; 0.032), and whether the patient had been diagnosed &amp;gt;5 years ago vs &amp;lt;1 year ago (estimate: 0.744, 95% CI: 0.255; 1.269). A high proportion of patients (60.9%) were willing to trade 12 months of their lives to receive treatment at home. Also, 59.0% and 56.4% of patients, respectively, were willing to trade 12 months to ensure that complications did not necessitate treatment in a hospital setting and that travelling to a hospital/clinic was not required to receive prophylaxis. Conclusions The majority of patients with cTTP or another chronic condition requiring treatment with regular IV infusions stated that they would prefer to receive treatment at home with support from healthcare providers. A high proportion of patients were also willing to trade 12 months of their lives to receive treatment at home; a limitation of the time trade-off exercise was that the maximum time that could be traded was 12 months. These findings provide insights into the importance of the treatment setting preferences of patients receiving prophylactic infusions.

Patient Preferences for Fixed Versus Treat-to-Progression Therapies in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

The treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has evolved in the last 8 years to include novel targeted therapies as alternatives to chemoimmunotherapy. These treatments vary in their benefit-risk profiles, mode and frequency of administration, and duration of treatment. Previous preference studies in CLL have evaluated preferences for treatment attributes such as efficacy, tolerability, and mode and frequency of administration. However, few have assessed preferences for treatment duration independently of mode of administration. This study sought to further understand the factors that influence patient preferences for treatment duration and to quantify the tradeoffs that patients were willing to accept to have a fixed duration therapy versus a treat-to-progression therapy. The study was conducted in 2 phases: (1) a qualitative phase of in-depth individual interviews with patients to identify the factors that influence patient preferences for treating until progression versus a fixed duration as well as the CLL treatment attributes that patients consider most important, and (2) a quantitative phase to estimate the tradeoffs that patients would accept among CLL treatment attributes. In the qualitative phase, the semistructured interview guide included open-ended questions and probes to understand perceptions of fixed-duration treatments compared with treat-to-progression regimens and to elicit a list of treatment attributes that influence CLL treatment preference. The results of the interviews informed the development of a web-based discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey. Respondents to the online survey answered 12 DCE questions, each offering a choice between 2 hypothetical treatment profiles defined by 7 attributes with varying levels, including treatment duration, which included levels for treat to progression and fixed duration for either 6 or 12 months. Data were analyzed using a random-parameters logit model, and estimated preference weights were used to calculate the maximum acceptable risk (MAR) of treatment-related adverse events the average respondent would accept in exchange for a move from a treat-to-progression to a fixed-duration therapy. The MAR is estimated as the ratio of the relative importance of an improvement in an attribute to the relative importance of a unit change in the level of risk (i.e., tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), atrial fibrillation, or fatigue). Interviews were conducted with 20 adults with a self-reported diagnosis of CLL. The mean age was 59 years, and 55% of participants (n = 11) identified as female. The mean time since diagnosis of CLL was 3 years, and 70% of participants (n = 14) had received treatment for CLL. Overall, 93 treatment attributes were spontaneously reported, including treatment duration. When probed, treatment duration was reported by 50% of participants as “very important” in their treatment decision. Almost all participants (n = 17) preferred a treatment with a fixed duration compared with treat-to-progression, assuming each had the same efficacy. Table 1 reports patients' perceived benefits and drawbacks of fixed-duration versus treat-to-progression therapies. The DCE survey was completed by 229 adults with a self-reported diagnosis of CLL for at least 3 months. The mean age was 66 years, and nearly 60% of the sample identified as female (n = 136). About 60% of the sample (n = 138) was diagnosed 5 or more years ago, and 152 respondents (66%) had experience with treatment for CLL. The results of the preference analysis showed that respondents preferred a fixed duration of either 6 months or 12 months versus treat-to-progression and, based on the MAR estimates, were willing to accept the following levels of risks to have a fixed-duration treatment versus treat to progression: more than a 3% increased risk of TLS, 6%-7% increased risk of atrial fibrillation, and 21%-26% increased risk of fatigue (Table 2). Past research has shown efficacy as the most important factor, yet qualitative interview participants also identified treatment duration as an important factor in their decision when choosing a CLL therapy. This finding was confirmed by the quantitative preference study, which revealed a preference for fixed-duration therapies over treat-to-progression regardless of the timeframe (6 or 12 months). Results from this study can help inform shared decision-making when considering alternative therapies for CLL.

Patient perspectives about treatment preferences for obesity with complications.

Obesity and many of its comorbidities can be improved by nutritional therapy, lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy, and surgical intervention. Relatively little is known about patients' preferences for the range of obesity treatments. The present study was undertaken to identify factors that may influence these preferences. By evaluating patient-preferred treatment options and factors influencing patients, treatment adherence and efficacy may be improved. Our objective was to identify factors that influence patient preferences and subsequent choice of obesity treatment among those seeking treatment for obesity-related complications. Participatory action research, using purposeful sampling, was used to recruit 33 patients with obesity complications. Recruitment took place in specialist clinics for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Sixteen males and 17 females aged 18-70years with a BMI>35kg/m2 were recruited. Prior to the interview, participants watched a 60-min video explaining nutritional therapies, pharmacotherapies, and surgical therapies in equipoise. Data were collected in one-to-one semi-structured interviews using zoom or the telephone; reflective thematic analysis was used. Four themes emerged: 1) structural factors, 2) autonomy, 3) interaction with formal care, and 4) the emotional and physical consequences of obesity. 39% of participants preferred nutritional therapy with support from medical professionals. 27% chose bariatric surgery. 24% chose pharmacotherapy alone, while 6% chose pharmacotherapy combined with nutritional therapy, 3% of participants wanted no intervention. The challenges can be addressed by increasing support for healthcare professionals toward enhancing both their knowledge and the health literacy of patients. Future research should focus on improving access to treatment pathways for patients as well as developing health literacy programs and educational programs for healthcare professionals.

The Influence Of Price, Trust, And Quality Of Service On The Decision To Use Oriskin Medan Clinic Services

This study aims to investigate the influence of price, trust, and service quality on decisions to use Oriskin Medan Clinic services. This research is an attempt to understand the factors that influence individual choices in choosing health services at this clinic. Data was collected through a survey involving a sample of Oriskin Medan Clinic patients. The results of this study reveal that price, level of trust in the clinic, and service quality contribute significantly to the decision to use clinic services. These findings highlight the importance of these aspects in influencing patient preferences in choosing a health clinic. Managerial implications and recommendations for healthcare practitioners are also discussed in this study to improve patient experience and sustainability of Oriskin Medan Clinic. This study can provide useful insights for stakeholders in the healthcare industry to develop more effective strategies in maintaining and increasing market share.

Protecting the Autonomy of Patients with Severe Mental Illness Through Psychiatric Advance Directive Peer-Facilitation

Protecting the Autonomy of Patients with Severe Mental Illness Through Psychiatric Advance Directive Peer-Facilitation

Treatment Preferences in Young Adults with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: A Qualitative Study from the Nordic Countries.

The purpose of this study is to explore treatment preferences and identify patient characteristics in young bio-naive adults with moderate to severe psoriasis in the Nordic countries (Norway, Finland, Sweden, and Denmark). Patients were 18-45years old and bio-naive but referred for biologic treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. Patients were included at eight Nordic dermatology clinics. Patients with significant comorbidity or psoriatic arthritis were excluded. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were assessed along with basic patient information. A semistructured interview guide was used in individual qualitative interviews, asking patients about their treatment preferences and reasons, disease journey, and disease management. The interviews were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Twenty-four patients sufficed to reach saturation in this qualitative study. The patient sample characteristics represented a qualitative variation in age, sex, symptoms, duration of disease, and country. We included a total of 12 male and 12 female patients. The mean age was 34years (range 18-45years), the mean age at diagnosis was 20years (range 6-34years), the mean± standard deviation (SD) time since diagnosis was 13 ± 8years, PASI was 9.5 ± 4.7, and DLQI was 15.2 ± 6.4. Interviews suggested that both the burden of disease as well as the burden of treatment influenced patient preferences regarding treatment attributes, hence getting alleviation from symptoms did not alone influence patient preferences. Time, effort, and inconvenience related to psoriasis treatments also influenced patient preferences. This first in-depth, qualitative study in young bio-naive adults with psoriasis suggests that patient preferences are focusing not only on symptom relief but also on alleviating the burden of psoriasis treatment. Understanding the reasons for patient preferences and the perspectives of young adults is needed to guide individual shared decision-making in psoriasis management.

PO-03-155 PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR ADDITIONAL HEALTH CARE INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATION IN SHARED DECISION MAKING IN AN OUTPATIENT CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CLINIC

Providing health care related information is a component of patient centered care that allows for shared decision making (SDM). Patient preferences for health care information (PPHI) and SDM vary among populations. Understanding PPHI may improve delivery of relevant information, especially for older patients who are seeking care for complex arrhythmic conditions in the time constrained outpatient setting. This study sought to understand patient preferences for participation in SDM and for the amount, format and delivery of additional relevant health information, as well as to explore the influence of select sociodemographic factors. Over four months, a convenience sample of adult patients, prior to their visit in an Electrophysiology (EP) clinic voluntarily completed an anonymous multiple-response survey ranking their preferences for the amount, delivery and format of information, and for their degree of participation in SDM. Bivariate analyses were used to correlate associations between demographic characteristics and PPHI. P values, assuming a significance level of 0.05, were obtained using chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Analyses were performed using (SAS®). Of 202 patients who participated, 76% wished to know most or all information for their condition such as diagnosis, treatment, procedures and complications (Table 1). Apart from face-to-face conversation, printed format was preferred by 83% for additional health information. Approximately 46% preferred their doctor to play a major role in SDM, while 52% preferred equal participation for various aspects of health care (diagnosis, treatment, procedures and risks). These were independent of age or education level. Patients older than 65 were less likely to own a smart phone or seek additional information online, and less likely to prefer a video format. Those who did not complete high school were less likely to have internet access, own a smart phone or search for information from other sources and did not prefer a video format. Understanding patient preferences for delivery and format for additional relevant health care information is essential for SDM in the outpatient EP setting. Advanced age and lower level of education contribute to technological vulnerability of patients and influence patient preferences for additional information and SDM. Health systems should integrate PPHI in the outpatient setting.

It takes more than a machine: A pilot feasibility study of point-of-care HIV-1 viral load testing at a lower-level health center in rural western Uganda.

Barriers continue to limit access to viral load (VL) monitoring across sub-Saharan Africa adversely impacting control of the HIV epidemic. The objective of this study was to determine whether the systems and processes required to realize the potential of rapid molecular technology are available at a prototypical lower-level (i.e., level III) health center in rural Uganda. In this open-label pilot study, participants underwent parallel VL testing at both the central laboratory (i.e., standard of care) and on-site using the GeneXpert HIV-1 assay. The primary outcome was the number of VL tests completed each clinic day. Secondary outcomes included the number of days from sample collection to receipt of result at clinic and the number of days from sample collection to patient receipt of the result. From August 2020 to July 2021, we enrolled a total of 242 participants. The median number of daily tests performed on the Xpert platform was 4, (IQR = 2-7). Time from sample collection to result was 51 days (IQR = 45-62) for samples sent to the central laboratory and 0 days (IQR = 0-0.25) for the Xpert assay conducted at the health center. However, few participants elected to receive results by one of the expedited options, which contributed to similar time-to-patient between testing approaches (89 versus 84 days, p = 0.07). Implementation of a rapid, near point-of-care VL assay at a lower-level health center in rural Uganda appears feasible, but interventions to promote rapid clinical response and influence patient preferences about result receipt require further study. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04517825, Registered 18 August 2020. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04517825.

Patient Preferences for Acne Vulgaris Treatment and Barriers to Care: A Survey Study.

The associated direct and indirect costs of acquiring acne vulgaris (acne) treatment from a clinician may prohibit some patients from doing so. Barriers to care may also influence patient preferences for treatment, and while both over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription acne treatments are efficacious, preferences for OTC or prescription acne medications are not well established. We recruited 529 adult subjects from the United States through Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), and subjects were surveyed about acne, their acne treatment preferences, and any barriers to care. A total of 450 subjects passed the attention check and were included in the analysis. Of respondents who had tried both OTC and prescription treatments (n=223), more respondents reported that they preferred prescription treatments (130/223, 58.3%), compared with OTC treatments (64/223, 28.7%); or no preference (29/223, 13.0%; P=0.00001). Almost half of all respondents also stated that they experienced barriers to accessing medical care for acne treatment (192/450 42.7%); cost and transportation were the top 2 factors. Considering how common barriers are, and their everchanging nature, some patients may benefit from a discussion of alternative non-prescription acne treatments, serving as a bridge to therapy or while patients are unable to reach a medical provider. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(11):1191-1195. doi:10.36849/JDD.6940.

Comparison of Pediatric Dermatology Conditions Across Telehealth and In-Person Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Understanding the utility of virtual visits in pediatric dermatology practice has become increasingly important in the telehealth era. We compared the conditions diagnosed in pediatric dermatology between traditional in-person visits and virtual telehealth visits during the initial 8-month phase of the COVID-19 pandemic at an urban medical institution. When given the option, pediatric dermatology patients and their families were more likely to choose telehealth visits for the diagnosis and/or management of acne, hemangiomas, and contact dermatitis; however, they were more likely to choose in-person visits for atopic dermatitis, viral warts, and alopecia areata. These differences may be attributed to clinical features of pediatric skin conditions, treatment options, and other factors which may influence patient preference for telehealth or in-person care for their condition. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(11):1260-1263. doi:10.36849/JDD.6843.

An analysis of factors that influence patient preference of third-line therapy for overactive bladder.

Patients with overactive bladder (OAB) refractory to first- and second-line therapy may pursue third-line therapies, including intradetrusor onabotulinum toxin-A (BTX), peripheral tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), and sacral neuromodulation (SNM). The factors that influence patient preference for each treatment modality have not yet been explored. This study sought to investigate the specific parameters that patients consider in choosing a third-line therapy for OAB. Patients refractory to first- and second-line therapies for OAB were identified in our outpatient clinic and asked to watch an educational video providing information on the risks and benefits of each third-line treatment option. They were then given a questionnaire to rank their preference of therapy and select reasons for why they found each therapy favorable and unfavorable. Patients under age 18 years, non-English speakers, those with a developmental disability, and those with a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder were excluded. Of the 98 patients included in the study, 40 participants (40.8%) chose intradetrusor BTX injections, 34 (34.7%) chose PTNS, and 16 (16.3%) chose SNM as their first choice. Seven patients (7.1%) chose none of the offered therapies, and one patient (1.0%) chose all three therapies with equal preference. BTX was found most attractive for its long efficacy (47%); its least attractive feature was the potential need for self-catheterization due to urinary retention (54%). PTNS was found most attractive for being a nonsurgical option (32%) and having no reported significant complications (39%); its least attractive feature was need for frequent office visits (61%). SNM was found most attractive for its potential for long-term relief without frequent office visits (53%); its least attractive feature was need for an implanted device (33%). Patients opting for SNM had higher scores on Urinary Distress Inventory-6and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 questionnaires when compared to patients opting for BTX injections or PTNS (p &lt; 0.05). 47.4% of patients eventually pursued a third-line therapy. Of those, there was a 67.6% concordance rate between the therapy patients ranked first and the therapy they eventually underwent. Patients with more severe OAB symptoms opt for more invasive and less time-consuming therapy with the potential for long-term relief, namely SNM. Despite thorough counseling, many patients do not progress to advanced OAB therapies. Understanding factors that influence patients' affinity towarda specific type of treatment can aid with individualized counseling on third-line OAB therapies.

Understanding patient preferences in anti-VEGF treatment options for age-related macular degeneration.

(1) To investigate the relative importance of convenience (consultation frequency and injection frequency) against treatment outcomes (visual and anatomical outcomes) and out-of-pocket medical costs via a discrete choice experiment (DCE), and (2) to investigate how patient characteristics affect patient treatment preferences. Eligibility criteria were: (1) receiving a neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) diagnosis; (2) receiving anti-VEGF treatment; (3) being ≥21 years old, and (4) being able to speak and understand English/Mandarin. Patients were presented with eight choice tasks and asked to choose between their current treatment and two hypothetical treatments that varied by six attributes: number of clinic visits in a year, number of injections in a year, vision quality, control of swelling in retina, drug labelling and out-of-pocket cost. This analysis involved 180 patients. Based on latent class logistic regressions, vision quality was the most important attribute (34%) followed by cost (24%). The frequency of total clinic visits (15%) was the third most-important attribute, closely followed by labelling (12%) and control of retina swelling (11%). Injection frequency was the least important attribute (4%). Vision quality was the most important attribute followed by the out-of-pocket costs. Given the same outcomes, patients preferred treatment regimens which require fewer total clinic visits. In comparison, injection frequency alone did not influence patient preferences. With increasing treatment options for nAMD, understanding patients' preferences can help clinicians in selecting agents and treatment regimen most preferred for each patient, which may lead to improved long-term adherence and outcomes.

Treatment decision-making among Asian Americans with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Treatment decision-making among Asian Americans with chronic rhinosinusitis.

Patient Factors and Preferences in Choosing Sleep Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Qualitative Study.

There are several obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment options available to patients, including surgery and less invasive therapies. Little is known about the factors that influence patient preferences for treatment. We aimed to understand factors influencing patient experience and decision making for undergoing sleep surgery. Retrospective qualitative study. Tertiary sleep surgery clinic. We conducted semistructured interviews with adults who previously underwent any nasal and/or pharyngeal sleep surgery. We asked open-ended questions about their decision-making process within a preconceived thematic framework of chief OSA symptoms, expectations for recovery, and sources of information. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed, and content was analyzed for defined, emergent, and prevalent themes. Ten patients were interviewed from December 11, 2020 through January 29, 2021. Six patients underwent nasal surgery, 1 underwent pharyngeal surgery, and 3 underwent staged nasal and pharyngeal procedures. All patients were beyond the acute recovery phase. Reasons for pursuing surgical consultation varied from sleep apnea burden to external factors, such as recommendations from significant others. Duration of sleep surgery consideration varied from months to years. Major concerns about sleep surgery involved anesthesia and postoperative pain. External factors influencing patients' decisions to pursue sleep surgery included family and friend support. Postoperative outcomes of surgery included patient satisfaction with decision for surgery, given OSA improvements. Understanding patient factors that influence decision making for sleep surgery may guide clinicians in patient-centered counseling that engages patients in decision making, aligning with clinical symptoms and patient preferences.

What factors influence patient preference for communication technology consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting? A qualitative study

What factors influence patient preference for communication technology consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting? A qualitative study