Influence Of Anesthetic Technique Research Articles

Influence of Anesthetic Techniques on Colorectal Cancer Recurrence: A Comprehensive Review.

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a significant risk of recurrence following surgical treatment. Emerging evidence suggests that perioperative factors, particularly anesthetic techniques, may influence cancer recurrence rates. This comprehensive review aims to critically analyze the impact of various anesthetic techniques on colorectal cancer recurrence. We explore the distinct immunomodulatory and inflammatory effects of general, regional, and combined anesthetic approaches and their potential influence on tumor biology. The review synthesizes findings from clinical studies, experimental research, and theoretical models, highlighting the differential impact of anesthetic choices on long-term oncological outcomes. By examining recurrence rates, immune responses, and inflammatory markers associated with different anesthetic techniques, this review provides a holistic understanding of the role of anesthetic management in colorectal cancer surgery. Our findings suggest that anesthetic techniques can modulate the immune and inflammatory responses in ways that may affect tumor recurrence, underscoring the need for further research to optimize anesthetic protocols. The review offers clinical recommendations based on current evidence and identifies gaps in knowledge, proposing directions for future investigations. This comprehensive analysis aims to inform clinical practice and guide future research, ultimately improving long-term outcomes for colorectal cancer patients.

Influence of anesthetic technique on postoperative cognitive impairment following multiple surgical interventions in patients with severe concomitant injury: a pilot study

Influence of anesthetic technique on postoperative cognitive impairment following multiple surgical interventions in patients with severe concomitant injury: a pilot study

Influence of anesthetic technique on survival after tumor debulking surgery of elderly patients with ovarian cancer: Results of a retrospective cohort study.

Epidural analgesia could influence the postoperative oncologic outcomes in patients with specific types of non-metastatic solid neoplasms. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of anesthetic technique on survival in elderly patients with ovarian cancer (OC). The records of all women with OC older than 60 years of age undergoing tumor debulking surgery at the University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Mainz, Germany) between January 2008 and December 2019 were obtained. The study cohort was divided into two groups based on the use of perioperative epidural anesthesia or not. First, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to analyze the prognostic influence of anesthetic technique on survival. Second, multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was adjusted for multiple conventional prognostic factors concerning three main categories: i) Current clinical-pathological tumor characteristics; ii) anesthesiologic parameters, including mean age, American Society of Anesthesiologists Performance Status and preexisting comorbidities summarized in the Charlson Comorbidity Index; and iii) oncological and surgical parameters such as oncological radicality and Surgical complexity Score. A total of 110 patients were included in the study and 71 (64.5%) of them received epidural analgesia. The median survival time was 26.0 months from primary debulking surgery and no significant differences in progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were noted between the ‘Epidural’ and ‘non-Epidural’ cohorts. After adjustment for the selected risk factors from the three categories, the effects of epidural analgesia on PFS and OS remained non-significant [PFS: hazard ratio (HR), 1.26; 95% CI, 0.66–2.39; and OS: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.45–1.40]. The present results did not support the independent association between epidural-supplemented anesthesia and improved PFS or OS in elderly patients with standardized ovarian cancer debulking surgery.

Current Understanding on Perioperative Management in Lung Cancer: Implications for Anesthetic Considerations.

Narcotic drugs are often used to treat perioperative pain for patients with lung cancer. However, anesthetic management and narcotic substance use may have significant impacts on patients with lung cancer, including anti-cancer or promoting cancer effects. In this study, we summarize the effects of anesthetic management and its related substances on lung cancer. An evidence-based review of the influence of anesthetic techniques and narcotic substances used on lung cancer was performed. The effects of perioperative pain management and the method of choosing anesthesia for patients with lung cancer were explored. Different management techniques of anesthesia have been indicated to suppress both cell-mediated immunity and humoral immunity and have effects on the recurrence and metastasis of lung cancer. Evidence suggests that the effects of narcotic substances used on lung cancer were still inconsistent. However, the mechanisms by which anesthetics and analgesics inhibit the tumor are complicated. Perioperative management leads to decreased immunity in patients with lung cancer, which to some extent contributes to recurrence and metastasis. Various narcotic substances used may modulate signal pathways, including the mitochondrial pathway, and appear to exert different effects on the recurrence and metastasis of lung cancer. The anesthesiologists should consider these effects on perioperative management with lung cancer.

Influence of Anesthetic Techniques on Perioperative Outcomes after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

The purpose of the study was to explore the influence of anesthetic techniques on perioperative outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in a Chinese population. A retrospective review was performed in patients after elective EVAR for infrarenal AAA at our single center. Patients were classified into general anesthesia (GA), regional anesthesia (RA), and local anesthesia (LA) groups. The primary outcomes (30-day mortality and morbidity) and secondary outcomes [procedure time, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and length of hospital stay (LOS)] were collected and analyzed. From January 2006 to December 2015, 486 consecutive patients underwent elective EVAR at our center. GA was used in 155 patients (31.9%), RA in 56 (11.5%), and LA in 275 (56.6%). The GA patients had fewer respiratory comorbidities, shorter and more angulated proximal necks, and more concomitant iliac aneurysms. LA during EVAR was significantly associated with a shorter procedure time (GA, P<0.001; RA, P<0.001) and shorter LOS (GA, P=0.002; RA, P=0.001), but a higher MAP (GA, P<0.001; RA, P<0.001) compared with GA and RA. LA was associated with a significantly lower risk of cardiac (odds ratio (OR) 4.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-15.04), pulmonary (OR 5.37, 95% CI 1.58-18.23), and systemic complications (OR 4.15, 95% CI 1.85-9.33) compared with GA. RA was also associated with a decreased risk of systemic complications (OR 4.74, 95% CI 1.19-18.92) compared with GA. There was no difference in the 30-day mortality, neurologic complications, renal complications, and intraoperative extra procedures among the 3 groups. Anesthetic techniques for EVAR have no influence on the 30-day mortality. LA for EVAR appears to be beneficial concerning the procedure time, LOS, and 30-day systemic complications for patients after elective EVAR for infrarenal AAA in the Chinese population.

Scalp Block Is Associated With Improved Recurrence Profiles in Patients Undergoing Primary Glioma Resection Surgery.

Glioma is associated with high recurrence and poor survival, despite the success of tumor resection surgery. This may be partly because the immune microenvironment within a glioma is susceptible to perioperative immunosuppression. Therefore, intraoperative anesthesia-related immunomodulators, such as scalp block, intravenous anesthesia, the opioid dosage administered, and transfusions, may influence oncological outcomes among patients with glioma. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the influence of anesthetic techniques on oncological outcomes after craniotomy for glioma resection, particularly the effects of scalp block, intravenous anesthesia, and inhalation anesthesia. Consecutive patients who underwent primary glioma resection surgeries between January 2010 and December 2017 were analyzed to compare postcraniotomy oncological outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival) by using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression analysis. A propensity score-matched regression analysis including prognostic covariates was also conducted to analyze the selected relevant anesthetic factors of the unmatched regression model. A total of 230 patients were included in the final analysis. No analyzed anesthetic factor was associated with overall survival. Patients who received scalp block had a more favorable median (95% confidence interval [CI]) PFS (55.37 [95% CI, 12.63-62.23] vs. 14.07 [95% CI, 11.27-17.67] mo; P=0.0053). Scalp block was associated with improved PFS before (hazard ratio, 0.465; 95% CI, 0.272-0.794; P=0.0050) and after (hazard ratio, 0.367; 95% CI, 0.173-0.779; P=0.0091) propensity score-matched Cox regression analysis. By contrast, intravenous anesthesia, amount of opioid consumed, and transfusion were not associated with PFS. The study results suggest that the scalp block improves the recurrence profiles of patients receiving primary glioma resection.

Effect of Anesthetic Technique on the Occurrence of Acute Kidney Injury after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Recent studies have reported the advantages of spinal anesthesia over general anesthesia in orthopedic patients. However, little is known about the relationship between acute kidney injury (AKI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and anesthetic technique. This study aimed to identify the influence of anesthetic technique on AKI in TKA patients. We also evaluated whether the choice of anesthetic technique affected other clinical outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent TKA between January 2008 and August 2016. Perioperative data were obtained and analyzed. To reduce the influence of potential confounding factors, propensity score (PS) analysis was performed. A total of 2809 patients and 2987 cases of TKA were included in this study. A crude analysis of the total set demonstrated a significantly lower risk of AKI in the spinal anesthesia group. After PS matching, the spinal anesthesia group showed a tendency for reduced AKI, without statistical significance. Furthermore, the spinal anesthesia group showed a lower risk of pulmonary and vascular complications, and shortened hospital stay after PS matching. In TKA patients, spinal anesthesia had a tendency to reduce AKI. Moreover, spinal anesthesia not only reduced vascular and pulmonary complications, but also shortened hospital stay.

The influence of anesthetic techniques on postoperative cognitive function in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: General vs spinal anesthesia

BackgroundHip fracture is common and morbid in elderly patients. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is also very common in these subjects undergoing surgery with an incidence which exceeds 40% in some reports. To date, the evidence is ambiguous as to whether anesthetic technique may affect the patients’ outcome as far as postoperative cognitive function is concerned. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the effect of general and subarachnoid (spinal) anesthesia on the development of POCD up to 30 days after surgery in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Methods Subjects over 65 years with hip fracture undergoing surgery were recruited for this study. They were enrolled and randomized to receive either general anesthesia (GA group) or subarachnoid (spinal) anesthesia (S group). Cognitive function was assessed using a battery of neuropsychological tests undertaken preoperatively and at 30 days postoperatively. The incidence of delirium was examined during the same period and their functional status, in terms of activities of daily living was also recorded. ResultsA total of seventy patients, 33 men and 37 females, mean age of 76 years were analyzed. Thirty-three patients received general anesthesia (GA group) and 37 subarachnoid (spinal) anesthesia (S group). The two groups of patients were similar with respect to baseline characteristics, comorbidities and perioperative data. The results of neuropsychological testing showed that there were no significant differences between the groups in eight out of ten neurocognitive tests at baseline and 30 days after surgery. There was a statistically significant decline of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale score in S group compared with group GA on the 30th postoperative day (p = 0.043). A significant decline was also present in Color-Word Task test in S group compared with group GA at baseline (p = 0.014) and 30 days postoperatively (p = 0.003). Postoperative delirium was present in four patients (12%) for the GA group, and in 10 patients (27%) for the group receiving subarachnoid anesthesia. ConclusionWe concluded that the choice of anesthesia modality does not appear to influence the emergence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Вплив методу анестезії на кровообіг під час і після ендопротезування кульшового суглоба

Вплив методу анестезії на кровообіг під час і після ендопротезування кульшового суглоба

Influence of anaesthetic technique on maternal and foetal outcome in category 1 caesarean sections - A prospective single-centre observational study.

Background and Aims:In category 1 caesarean section (CS), there is limited evidence regarding superior anaesthetic technique. Hence, this study was designed to study the influence of anaesthetic technique on the maternal and foetal outcome.Methods:Patient characteristics, indication for CS, decision-to-delivery interval (DDI), uterine incision-to-delivery time (UIDT), cord blood pH, Apgar scores and neonatal and maternal outcome were noted. Composite endpoint (Apgar score <7, umbilical cord blood pH <7.2, neonatal intensive care unit admission or death) was created for adverse neonatal outcome. Logistic regression was done to assess the influence of confounding factors on the occurrence of adverse neonatal outcome.Results:Of 123 patients who underwent category 1 cesarean section, 114 patients were included for analysis. The DDI and UIDT were comparable. One and 5-min Apgar scores were significantly lower in the group general anaesthesia (GA) than in the group spinal anaesthesia (SA). The umbilical cord blood pH was comparable (7.21 ± 0.15 vs 7.25 ± 0.11 in groups GA and SA, respectively). Neonatal intensive care admission and maternal outcome were comparable in both the groups. Subgroup analysis of patients with foetal heart rate of less than 100 showed that group GA had significantly lower 1-min Apgar scores and umbilical cord blood pH and significantly more neonatal admission and mortality. Binominal logistic regression showed that group GA (odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence intervals 1.27-6.41) and gestational age were independently associated with adverse neonatal outcome.Conclusion:GA for category 1 CS was associated with increased incidence of adverse neonatal outcome.

Cervical plexus anesthesia versus general anesthesia for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

Both general anesthesia (GA) and cervical plexus anesthesia (CPA) can be used for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of anesthetic techniques on perioperative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing cervical surgery.From January 2008 to December 2015, 356 patients who underwent 1-level ACDF for cervical spinal myelopathy were prospectively reviewed. They were assigned to receive GA (group A) and CPA (group B). The analgesic efficacy of the block was assessed by anesthesia preparation time, the maximum heart rate, and mean arterial blood pressure changes compared with the baseline, time of postoperative revival, and duration of recovery stay. Duration of surgery, blood loss, and anesthesia medical cost were also recorded. Numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to evaluate pain at different time points. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was assessed, and postoperative average administered dosages of meperidine and metoclopramide were also recorded. The spinal surgeon satisfaction, anesthetist satisfaction, and patient satisfaction were assessed.Both the anesthesia induction time and postoperative revival time were longer in group A than that in group B; both the duration of surgery and recovery stay were also longer in group A than that in group B, whereas there was no difference in blood loss between the 2 groups. The average dosage of both meperidine and metoclopramide was more in group A than that in group B, and the anesthesia medical cost was greater in group A than that in group B. There were no significant differences in baseline data of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate between the 2 groups. But the intraoperative data of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate were higher/larger in group B than that in group A. In group A, there was no complaint of pain in the surgery procedure, but the pain increased after GA, with highest degree at 8 hours postoperation; then the pain degree decreased, and the NRS was 1 at 24 hours postoperation. In group B, intraoperative pain was NRS 4, and pain degree decreased from 4 hours postoperation; the NRS was 2 at 24 hours postoperation. The incidence of severe PONV was higher in group A than that in group B. There was no significant difference in the spinal surgeon satisfaction and anesthetist satisfaction for the anesthetic techniques. There was significant difference in patient satisfaction between the 2 groups, with high satisfaction for GA.General anesthesia is superior to CPA in maintaining better intraoperative hemodynamic stability and providing high patient satisfaction with no intraoperative pain for patients receiving ACDF, but it entails longer surgery and anesthesia time, and requires more postoperative analgesic and anesthesia cost.

Operating unit time use is associated with anaesthesia type in below-knee surgery in adults.

Peripheral nerve blocks could reduce the operating unit and theatre time spent on high-risk patients who are particularly vulnerable to complications of general anaesthesia or have medications that prevent application of central neuraxial blocks. Medical record data of 617 and 254 elderly adults undergoing below-knee surgery in Jorvi and Meilahti hospitals (Helsinki University Hospital) between January 2010 and December 2012 were used to investigate the influence of anaesthetic technique on operating theatre times and on operating unit times using flexible parametric survival models. We report operating theatre and unit exit ratios (i.e. hazard ratios but using ratios of exit rates) for different types of anaesthesia. Adjusted analyses: In Jorvi Hospital, anaesthesia type was associated with large initial differentials in operating theatre times. The theatre exit ratios remained lower for general anaesthesia and central neuraxial blocks compared to peripheral nerve blocks until 30 min. In Meilahti Hospital, anaesthesia type did not influence theatre time, but was the best predictor of operating unit times. Compared to peripheral nerve blocks, the exit ratio remained lower for general anaesthesia until five operating unit hours in both hospitals and for central neuraxial blocks until 1 h in Meilahti Hospital and until 3 h in Jorvi Hospital. Holding area was used more in Jorvi Hospital compared to Meilahti Hospital. Peripheral nerve block anaesthesia reduces time spent in the operating unit and can reduce time spent in the operating theatre if induced in holding area outside of theatre.

Influence of Anaesthesia on Mobilisation Following Hip Fracture Surgery: An Observational Study: 麻醉技術對髖部骨折病人術後活動能力的影響：一項觀察性研究

BackgroundAnaesthetic technique can influence mortality and morbidity following hip fracture surgery. However, its influence on postoperative mobilisation is not clear. In this study, we evaluated the influence of anaesthetic technique on postoperative mobilisation. MethodsIn this prospective observational study, we included all consecutive patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2013 at our institution. Any patients who died prior to mobilisation or who could not be followed up after surgery were excluded. Data was collected on demographics, clinical characteristics, anaesthesia technique and surgical factors, and date and time of admission, operation, first mobilisation and discharge. ResultsOf the 1040 patients included in the analysis, 264 received general anaesthesia only (Group GA), 322 received general anaesthesia with regional anaesthesia (Group GARA), and 454 received central neuraxial blockade anaesthesia with or without sedation (Group CNB). There was no significant difference in age (p = 0.56), sex (p = 0.23), number of comorbidities (p = 0.06), residential status (p = 0.18), time to surgery (p = 0.10) and length of hospital stay (p = 0.30) between the three groups. There was a statistically significant difference in ASA grade (p = 0.01), implant type used (p = 0.04), grade of operating surgeon (p = 0.02) and grade of anaesthetist during surgery (p = 0.004) among the three groups. Patients in Group GARA had a median time-to-first mobilisation of 23.8 hours after surgery, compared to 24.1 hours in Group GA and 24.3 hours in Group CNB. This difference was not statistically significant after controlling for confounding factors (p = 0.45). ConclusionOur results show that anaesthetic technique does not influence time-to-first mobilisation after hip fracture surgery.

Влияние метода анестезии на возникновение послеоперационной когнитивной дисфункции у пациентов пожилого возраста при операциях в гинекологии

Влияние метода анестезии на возникновение послеоперационной когнитивной дисфункции у пациентов пожилого возраста при операциях в гинекологии

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after inhalational anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing major surgery: the influence of anesthetic technique, cerebral injury and systemic inflammation.

BackgroundElderly patients are reportedly at higher risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) after inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane. We hypothesized that the incidence of POCD would be higher in elderly patients undergoing major surgery under inhalational rather than intravenous anesthesia. We also measured plasma S-100β protein concentration as a biomarker of central nervous system injury, and plasma interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α concentrations to judge the contribution of systemic inflammation to POCD.MethodsNinety patients aged 65–75 years scheduled for resection of an esophageal carcinoma were randomly assigned to one of three groups (n = 30) as follows: a group receiving sevoflurane anesthesia (Group S); a group receiving preoperative methylprednisolone before sevoflurane anesthesia (Group S + MP); and a control group maintained with intravenous propofol (Group C). The mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) were used to measure patients’ cognitive function the day before surgery, and on the first, third and seventh postoperative days. The plasma concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6 and S-100β protein were measured 10 min before anesthesia, and on the first, third and seventh postoperative days.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the demographic or clinical characteristics, or perioperative hemodynamic status, of the three groups. The MMSE and MoCA scores were significantly lower in Group S than in the propofol control (Group C) and Group S + MP on the first, third and seventh postoperative days (P <0.05). Throughout the first postoperative week the plasma concentrations of TNF-α, IL-6, and S-100β protein were significantly elevated in Group S compared with Group C (P <0.05), but were significantly lower in Group S + MP than Group S (P <0.05).ConclusionsThe incidence of POCD was higher in elderly patients undergoing major surgery under inhalational anesthesia with sevoflurane than those maintained on intravenous propofol, and lower in elderly patients pro-treating with methylprednisolone. Furthermore, we found elevated plasma concentrations of S-100β protein, TNF-α and IL-6 in those receiving sevoflurane anesthesia.Trial registrationChiCTR-IOR-15007007 (02-09-2015).

Cancer-Free or Overall Survival Rate Following Radical Prostatectomy is not Influenced by Perioperative Pain Management

Objective: There is controversial data regarding influence of anesthetic techniques on the outcome of patients undergoing cancer surgery. In particular, whether patients benefit from the application of regional techniques is elaborately discussed. Therefore we enrolled a retrospective analysis to determine the influence of different anesthetic techniques in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy due to prostate cancer. Methods: After ethics approval, we viewed our medical record archive for patients that received radical prostatectomy between 1995 and 2005 and included 300 patients. They were divided according to their postoperative pain regime (systemic opioids vs. epidural analgesia). Recurrence-free survival was defined as the primary endpoint and overall survival as the secondary endpoint. The study period covered at least the first five post-operative years. Results: We documented no difference in recurrence-free or overall survival comparing the two analgesic regimes. However, we observed that higher body-mass-indexes (BMI) significantly correlated with a worse outcome (recurrence-free survival p=0.037, overall survival p=0.02). Other factors influencing the outcome were the Gleason score (5-6 vs. 10 p=0.016; 7 vs. 10 p=0.08) and surgical margins free of cancer (p=0.04). Conclusion: In this study, different anesthetic techniques did not influence recurrence-free or overall survival rate. Interestingly, we could identify BMI as a risk factor with potential impact on the outcome of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Adequately powered prospective randomized trials are required to decide on the effect of regional anesthesia in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.

術後栄養療法に私たち麻酔科医ができること

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery（ERAS®）は，多くの施設で実践されている．このプログラムの大きな目標は早期離床と，絶食期間の短縮である．術後の栄養療法再開には悪心・嘔吐の予防，鎮痛，消化管機能の改善が不可欠である．今回，これらの因子に麻酔方法が与える影響について，2011年に当院産婦人科で術後鎮痛法を用いた手術を朝1例目の搬入で受けた連続する125名の患者を対象とし後方視的に検討した．その結果，手術当日の嘔吐がプロポフォール群でセボフルラン群より有意に少なかった．また，硬膜外麻酔群で手術当日の蠕動音を聴取した割合と，排ガスがあった割合が，PCA群より有意に高かった．手術当日の経口摂取にはプロポフォールと硬膜外麻酔が有効かもしれない．

Influence of anesthetic technique on postoperative oral intake in gynecological surgery

Influence of anesthetic technique on postoperative oral intake in gynecological surgery

The influence of anaesthetic technique on apoptosis in ER negative breast cancer cells

The influence of anaesthetic technique on apoptosis in ER negative breast cancer cells

¿Influyen las técnicas anestésicas en los resultados postoperatorios? Parte I

The influence of anesthetic technique on postoperative outcomes has opened a wide field of research in recent years.High-risk patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery are those who have higher incidence of postoperative complications and mortality. A proper definition of this group of patients should focus maximal efforts and resources to improve the results.In view of the significant reduction in postoperative mortality and morbidity in last 20 years, perioperative research should take into account new indicators to investigate the role of anesthetic techniques on postoperative outcomes. Studies focused on the evaluation of intermediate outcomes would probably discriminate better effectiveness differences between anesthetic techniques.We review some of the major controversies arising in the literature about the impact of anesthetic techniques on postoperative outcomes. We have grouped the impact of these techniques into 9 major investigation areas: mortality, cardiovascular complications, respiratory complications, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, chronic postoperative pain, cancer recurrence, postoperative nausea/vomiting, surgical outcomes and resources utilization.In this first part of the review, we discuss the basis on postoperative outcomes research, mortality, cardiovascular and respiratory complications.