Inflammatory Component Of Multiple Sclerosis Research Articles

Mitochondria in Multiple Sclerosis: Molecular Mechanisms of Pathogenesis.

Mitochondria, the organelles that function as the powerhouse of the cell, have been increasingly linked to the pathogenesis of many neurological disorders, including multiple sclerosis (MS). MS is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) and a leading cause of neurological disability in young adults in the western world. Its etiology remains unknown, and while the inflammatory component of MS has been heavily investigated and targeted for therapeutic intervention, the failure of remyelination and the process of axonal degeneration are still poorly understood. Recent studies suggest a role of mitochondrial dysfunction in the neurodegenerative aspects of MS. This review is focused on mitochondrial functions under physiological conditions and the consequences of mitochondrial alterations in various CNS disorders. Moreover, we summarize recent findings linking mitochondrial dysfunction to MS and discuss novel therapeutic strategies targeting mitochondria-related pathways as well as emerging experimental approaches for modeling mitochondrial disease.

Peptide immunotherapy in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

We now have potent drugs available to treat the inflammatory component of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, not all patients respond, the drugs are not curative, and the associated risks to beneficial immune surveillance are considerable. A more desirable approach is to specifically target those comparatively rare T lymphocytes that are orchestrating the autoimmune attack. Using the autoantigen itself to instill immune tolerance in those cells remains a holy grail of immunotherapy. Peptide immunotherapy (PIT) is highly effective at silencing autoimmune responses in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), and clinical trials of PIT are underway in MS. This review discusses the current paradigms for PIT-induced tolerance in naïve T cells. It highlights the need for better understanding of the mode of action of PIT upon memory and effector T cells that are responsible for driving/sustaining ongoing autoimmune pathology. Recent studies in EAEsuggest genetic and epigenetic changes in these pathogenic T-cell populations in response to PIT. Finally, future challenges to effective translation of PIT to the clinic are considered.

Influence of Peripheral inflammation on the progression of multiple sclerosis: Evidence from the clinic and experimental animal models

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by demyelination, remyelination and loss of functions. Even though its etiology is unknown viral, genetic and environmental factors are considered triggers of the disease. MS shows a heterogeneous clinical course, but most patients exhibit exacerbations and remissions from the onset, eventually leading to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Systemic inflammatory events are known to signal into the central nervous system (CNS), and can induce a general response known as sickness behavior. Several research papers have demonstrated that a peripheral stimulus can induce the synthesis of cytokines in the brain. In different neurodegenerative diseases peripheral inflammation generates exacerbation to ongoing damage in the brain. In MS, relapsing and remitting episodes are unpredictable; however, peripheral inflammation may exacerbate these events. Clinical studies revealed an association between infections and relapses, which may lead to the worsening of neurological damage. A similar scenario was described in MS animal models demonstrating that peripheral inflammation recrudesced a central ongoing demyelinating lesion. In this paper, we reviewed the existing data on the inflammatory component of MS, with special attention on the effect of peripheral infections in the etiology and progression of MS and its effect on the relapsing and remitting episodes. We also analyzed data concerning the effect of peripheral inflammatory events in MS experimental animal models. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Neuroinflammation in neurodegeneration and neurodysfunction'.

The importance of clinical trials in unraveling the mysteries of multiple sclerosis

Despite a number of new therapies that are effective in reducing the inflammatory component of multiple sclerosis, the underlying cause of the disease remains uncertain. One of the most powerful tools available to an investigator to help in unraveling the underlying disease mechanisms in MS is the incorporation of careful imaging and laboratory studies into clinical trials. Regardless of the outcome of the trial with respect to modification of clinical disease, probing the biological effects of the treatment in relationship to the clinical outcome can provide important insights into the disease. Unfortunately, careful proof-of-principle laboratory studies are often not supported by the sponsors of clinical trials and mechanisms for rapid funding of supporting laboratory studies is difficult. Consequently important opportunities to better understand the disease are missed.

Application of Interferon Beta-1b in Multiple Sclerosis

Recombinant interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b) was the first approved disease-modifying therapy for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) by the world regulatory agencies for medical drugs and devices. IFNβ-1b significantly decreases the inflammatory component of MS but still has doubtable effect on the neurodegenerative component. This article appraises the beneficial effects of IFNβ-1b on clinical and imaging measures of disease. Upon only briefly discussing the side effects of the drug, it will conclude with some crucial scientific aspects warranting urgent investigations to precisely address the potentials of IFNβ-1b in MS patients.

New Therapeutic Approaches for Multiple Sclerosis

Although several therapies exist for multiple sclerosis (MS), the most common inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), there remains a large unmet clinical need for more effective immunomodulatory treatments in this category of diseases and for interventions that address their neurodegenerative component, which is currently untreated. Progress in our understanding of the immunology of MS over the past 30 years has recently synergized with novel computational methods and emerging high-throughput technologies that characterize variations in DNA, RNA, proteins, and metabolites to usher in a period of intense pathophysiologic investigation. These efforts are beginning to define subsets of patients with different forms of demyelinating disease. This partitioning of patients will prove valuable as we begin to tailor immunotherapy to the underlying pathophysiologic processes of individual patients using current therapies, emerging treatments, and rational combinations of all of these treatments. Preventing the entry of lymphocytes into the CNS and modifying the nature of the immune response are treatment approaches that work in the inflammatory component of MS but have little or no effect on neurodegeneration. Two challenges confront us: to develop cocktails of therapies that shift the immune homeostasis of patients with MS toward a healthy profile, and to identify and modulate the activity of targets within the neurodegenerative component of MS.

Promoting repair in multiple sclerosis: problems and prospects

Despite recent progress in treating the inflammatory component of multiple sclerosis, current therapies have no clear impact on progression of disability, which closely relates to tissue (myelin and axon) injury. Many scientists now focus their efforts on elucidating the mechanisms that lead to tissue injury, and on developing new strategies for tissue repair. We review recent breakthroughs in this field and discuss their putative applications to therapy. Several hypotheses have been raised to explain the failure of remyelination, including depletion of remyelinating cells, quiescence of oligodendrocyte precursor cells and axonal inhibitory signals. Success in remyelination therapy may be achieved either by enhancing endogenous repair or by grafting exogenous remyelinating cells. Several neurotrophic factors have been shown to enhance endogenous remyelination, and many immature cells have been shown to induce efficient exogenous remyelination in animal models. Although effective remyelination probably represents the best way to prevent neurodegeneration, several alternative neuroprotective strategies are emerging. Statins, cyclins and immunophilin ligands are orally available immunomodulatory agents that may protect neurones. Other promising possibilities include the modulation of excitotoxicity, nitric oxide synthesis, or cationic channels. Despite the increasing number of putative therapeutic targets, no treatment to achieve remyelination or neuroprotection has yielded positive clinical results in humans. Forging a link between basic biology and treatment of patients will require us to overcome several challenges, including assessment of efficacy of repair, improving tolerance to and delivery of neurotrophic factors, and better defining the indications for and limitations of transplantation.

Physiopathology of multiple sclerosis.

Pleiotropy and redundancy are distinctive elements of the immune response. Recent research into the inflammatory component of multiple sclerosis (MS) indicates that, as expected, pleiotropy and redundancy characterize various physiopathological mechanisms of the disease. A certain degree of redundancy is becoming apparent also as far as the degenerative component is concerned. Cumulatively, these data suggest that treatments that target single pathogenetic pathways are unlikely to provide a definitive solution. Combination therapies may offer, in principle, some advantage, although there is a need for more information on the aetiology of the disease.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis: current status and future challenges

This article reviews recent advances in clinical trials of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a therapy for multiple sclerosis, and progress in exploring the potential for neural repair of hematopoietic-derived precursors. Important recent findings are that hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can completely suppress the inflammatory component of multiple sclerosis, hematopoietic stem cells can migrate into the central nervous systems of rodents and humans, and can differentiate into cells expressing neural and glial markers. Hematopoietic stem cells also have neural and myelin repair potential. The heterogeneity of transplant regimens, the selection of patients at different stages of disease in clinical trials, and the limited duration of follow-up all currently preclude the evaluation of the long-term clinical benefits of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is an experimental treatment that shows strong effects on the inflammatory component of multiple sclerosis. On the basis of experience acquired from initial pilot studies, controlled clinical trials are now being designed to verify long-term clinical efficacy. Selecting patients at high risk in the earlier stages of the disease that is dominated by inflammation, and monitoring objectively disease activity by magnetic resonance imaging will be critically important in these studies. Recent advances on the migratory potential and on the differentiation plasticity of hematopoietic stem cells have opened new opportunities for remyelination and axonal repair strategies for multiple sclerosis.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis: current status and future challenges

Purpose of review This article reviews recent advances in clinical trials of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as a therapy for multiple sclerosis, and progress in exploring the potential for neural repair of hematopoietic-derived precursors. Recent findings Important recent findings are that hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can completely suppress the inflammatory component of multiple sclerosis, hematopoietic stem cells can migrate into the central nervous systems of rodents and humans, and can differentiate into cells expressing neural and glial markers. Hematopoietic stem cells also have neural and myelin repair potential. The heterogeneity of transplant regimens, the selection of patients at different stages of disease in clinical trials, and the limited duration of follow-up all currently preclude the evaluation of the long-term clinical benefits of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis. Summary Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is an experimental treatment that shows strong effects on the inflammatory component of multiple sclerosis. On the basis of experience acquired from initial pilot studies, controlled clinical trials are now being designed to verify long-term clinical efficacy. Selecting patients at high risk in the earlier stages of the disease that is dominated by inflammation, and monitoring objectively disease activity by magnetic resonance imaging will be critically important in these studies. Recent advances on the migratory potential and on the differentiation plasticity of hematopoietic stem cells have opened new opportunities for remyelination and axonal repair strategies for multiple sclerosis.