Infiltration Analgesia In Total Knee Arthroplasty Research Articles

Local infiltration analgesia with additional intraarticular catheter provide better pain relief compared to single-shot local infiltration analgesia in TKA.

Local infiltration analgesia (LIA) has been proven to be efficient in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the effect of single-shot LIA is temporarily limited. The objective of this prospective trial was to investigate if the potential benefits resulting from LIA can be prolonged by a continuous intra-articular perfusion of LIA. The hypothesis of the present study was that the use of an additional continuous intra-articular perfusion delivering LIA would result in less pain and better function compared to single-shot LIA in the immediate post-operative period. 50 consecutively selected patients undergoing TKA received either a single-shot LIA (S-LIA group, 25 knees) or single-shot LIA combined with a continuous post-operative intra-articular perfusion for three post-operative days (CP-LIA group, 25 knees). VAS (visual analogue scale) for pain, pain medication consumption and flexion ability were recorded postoperatively for 6days. All patients had the same implant, surgeon and intra- as well as post-operative setting. The VAS score was significantly better for CP-LIA 6h after surgery and on post-operative day 1, 2 and 6. There was no significant difference with regard to additional opioid consumption or flexion ability of the knee. However, there was a trend of the CP-LIA group requiring less additional opioids over the complete post-operative period compared to the S-LIA group. There were no complications or revisions. LIA combined with an additional intra-articular catheter provides better short-term pain control compared to single-shot LIA. However, no significant differences in terms of knee flexion were observed. This limited benefit should be balanced against the additional costs and the possible higher risk of infection. Level II.

Reasons for Unsuccessful Same-Day Discharge Following Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: 5½ Years' Experience From a Single Institution

BackgroundOutpatient joint arthroplasty (OJA) is considered safe and feasible in selected patients but should be further optimized to improve success rates. The purposes of this study are to (1) identify the main reasons of unsuccessful same-day discharge (SDD) following hip and knee arthroplasty; (2) determine the hospital length of stay (LOS) following unsuccessful SDD; and (3) assess which independent variables are related to specific reasons for unsuccessful SDD. MethodsFive hundred twenty-five patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively identified. SDD to home was planned in all patients. Specific reasons for unsuccessful SDD and LOS were assessed. Bivariate analysis was performed to find differences in independent variables between patients experiencing a specific reason for unsuccessful SDD and control patients. ResultsOne hundred ten patients (21%) underwent unsuccessful SDD. The main reason was postoperative reduced motor function and sensory disturbances (33%). The mean LOS in the unsuccessful SDD group was 1.7 days (standard deviation ± 1.0 days). Postoperative transient reduced motor function and sensory disturbances occurred more often in patients undergoing TKA (P < .001). ConclusionAn option for overnight stay should be available when performing outpatient hip and knee arthroplasty. The main reason for unsuccessful SDD in this study was transient postoperative reduced motor function and sensory disturbance, most likely due to intraoperative local infiltration analgesia in TKA. No other studies have found local infiltration analgesia to be an issue preventing SDD.