Timber is the principal material used in old framework buildings. Present research suggests that the vertical loads are exclusively applied to the timber girders, but the timber frame can not bear all vertical loads if the posts are spaced wide apart. These structures have nevertheless remained stable for over 100 years. Our present knowledge is not sufficient to determine the ultimate load-bearing capacity of this type of construction which has gone out of use. The Institute has conducted practical tests and theoretical studies which make it possible to forecast buckling failures for wall systems as a function of vertical load. 1 Structure and material 1.1 Structure Stud walls are framework structures in which the spacing of some posts equals their length, giving square infill areas in a number of cases. There is normally no strutting, with the exception of the bays nearest to the outer wall, and the attic. The cross section of the pine timber posts suits the wall thickness which is !4 brick (12 cm thick). The horizontal girders are head rails arranged under the floor beams. (Fig. 1) The masonry is butt-jointed to the timber structure. Recesses in the posts and mortar-sealed joints between the posts and masonry are rare. Equilibrium moisture Transactions on the Built Environment vol 39 © 1999 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 46 Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Historical Buildings Figure 1: building with the descripted form of framework was achieved in covered open buildings by allowing them to stand empty for one winter before putting in windows, followed by alternate heating and airing to drive out more moisture. 1.2 Material To simplify classification, timber quality can be described as grade 10 (DIN 4074) in present terms (pine wood). The carpenters of the time selected timbers by appearance, and members intended for high loads will often have been of an even better grade, but this will be neglected here. Due to a strong demand for bricks, the number of clay pits and brick yards rose rapidly, with new types of bricks being developed and patented all the time. Brick quality therefore differed largely even within a single building. In our studies, three different strength classes for bricks (Fig. 2) were found in four walls of two buildings erected almost at the same time (1874 and 1876). For another Transactions on the Built Environment vol 39 © 1999 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Historical Buildings 47 building with inner walls made of porous bricks, a statistically significant average compression strength was established. Mortar quality is very much a function of aging, and chemical analysis of mortar composition at the time of production allows no conclusion as to its present compression strength. Partial sampling so far would put most of the masonry structures only in mortar group I. Following Brocker's findings, the admissible compression stress is assumed to be c=0.6N/mnf (Brb'cker, [1]). 20.00