The importance of the growth of the ramus in normal development of the mandible has been recognized for many years. Sarnat [2] has shown the importance of condylar growth experimentally m monkeys. Ricketts [3] has demonstrated the importance of condylar growth in children using a special radiographic technique. No one has proved that prognathic mandibles develop by any mechanism or in a manner greatly different from that of normal mandibles. The prognathic mandible seems to be an expression of quantitative growth rather than of qualitative growth. The size and shape of the alveolar arches of prognathic patients are usually harmonious after their relationship has been corrected. Therefore, the configuration of the prognathic mandible seems to verify the fact that the overgrowth of bone occurs mainly in the ramus, perhaps greatly influenced by condylar growth, as in normal development. For these reasons we believe an operation in the subcondylar region, as close to the origin of overgrowth as possible, properly performed, will produce the best anatomic and physiologic results. Some of the operations used in the treatment of prognathism, such as those involving the overlapping of bone fragments, produce a second deformity while attempting to correct the original deformity. In the application of our technique we have followed sound orthopedic surgical principles in order to correct the prognathism, while producing a minimal disturbance of the normal anatomic position of the associated structures, thereby maintaining or enhancing proper function and improving esthetics. The submandibular approach, or modification thereof, has proved to be a very popular method of entree into the ramus. With proper precautions the two possible complications which have been mentioned in connection with this approach, i.e., injury to the mandibular branch of the facial nerve and parotid fistula, have not proved to be troublesome in a variety of maxillofacial procedures in which this approach has been used. The ever-present possibility of injury to the internal maxillary artery, and the inferior alveolar artery and nerve which exists in operations on the superior portion of the ramus has been eliminated by the presence of the protecting retractor. (Fig. 6.) At the same time accuracy is assured by the use of a precise cutting guide. By careful preoperative study on a stone articulator, as described herein, the relationship of the holes for interosseous wiring can be determined so as to allow for vertical as well as horizontal transposition of the anterior segment which bears the dental arch, and a balanced occlusion with a positively controlled edge-to-edge approximation of the bone fragments can be assured. We believe this new technique of oblique ostectomy of the ramus offers the following advantages: 1. 1. The operative area, as far as we can determine, is as near the anatomic origin of the deformity as possible. 2. 2. The subauriculomandibular approach offers adequate exposure for good visualization of, and access to, the operative area and leaves an inconspicuous scar. 3. 3. There is no oral contamination of the wounds and an aseptic surgical technique is possible. 4. 4. The special self-retaining retractor offers maximum protection to important blood vessels and nerves medial to the site of ostectomy. 5. 5. The preoperative study and precise cutting guide assures accuracy of ostectomy. 6. 6. At the site of operation the ramus is devoid of important blood vessels and nerves, and is relatively free of muscle attachments. 7. 7. The intact body of the mandible and its contiguous tissues are transposed as a unit. 8. 8. The edge-to-edge approximation of bone fragments, stabilized by interosseous wires, reduces the period of immobilization to a minimum and prevents an open bite deformity. 9. 9. The muscles of mastication, with the exception of the external pterygoid muscles, remain attached to the large, denture-bearing, anterior fragment of the mandible which further tends to stabilize the mandible and prevent an open bite deformity. 10. 10. There is minimal disturbance to or enhancement of the functional positions of the muscles of mastication, muscles of the floor of the mouth and the tongue. 11. 11. No teeth are sacrificed or devitalized, and the size of the alveolar arch is not diminished. 12. 12. The acuteness of the gonial angle is increased. 13. 13. The heads of the condyles are retained in their original positions, thereby maintaining the integrity of the intratemporomandibular joint anatomic relationships. 14. 14. By the removal of accurate sections of bone and interosseous wiring, proper alignment of the fragments is maintained. 15. 15. There is no danger of interposing soft tissue between the bone fragments, and healing of bone in the subcondylar region is excellent. 16. 16. The technique requires no elaborate or special method of intermaxillary fixation during the healing process, and is an excellent procedure for edentulous patients.
Read full abstract