Infection In Cardiac Patients Research Articles

The Effects of Moxifloxacin and Gemifloxacin on the ECG Morphology in Healthy Volunteers: A Phase 1 Randomized Clinical Trial

Moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin are the two newer broad-spectrum 8-methoxy-quinolone derivatives that are used to treat various bacterial infections in cardiac patients. In this research study, we assessed the impact of moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin on the QT intervals of electrocardiograms in normal adult doses and draw a comparison, in a controlled environment, on healthy volunteers. Additionally, the effect of both test drugs on the QRS complex was checked. Sixty healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to two groups via R-software, and each respectively received moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin for five days. The research ethics committee approved the research, and it was registered for clinical trial under NCT04692623. The participants' electrocardiograms were obtained before the start of the dose (baseline) and on the fifth day. Significant prolongation of QT interval was noted in moxifloxacin (p < 0.0001) as compared to gemifloxacin treated groups. There were no cases of QTc prolongation over the usual limits (450-470 ms) in the gemifloxacin-treated group, however, QTc prolongations at the rate of 30 and 60 ms from the baseline were noted, interpreted as per the EMEA guidelines. These findings indicate that moxifloxacin caused significant (p < 0.0001) QT interval prolongation (QTIP) as compared to gemifloxacin. In contrast to the previously reported literature, the prominent effect of moxifloxacin on the widening of the QRS-complex was noted with no such effect on QRS-widening in the gemifloxacin-treated group. It is concluded that both drugs have the potential for considerable QT interval prolongation (QTIP) effects, which is one of the risk factors for developing torsade de pointes (TdPs) in cardiac patients. Thus, clinicians should exercise caution when prescribing moxifloxacin and gemifloxacin to cardiac patients and should consider alternate treatment options.

Risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia due to multi-drug resistant organisms after cardiac surgery in adults

BackgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections, which can cause multiple adverse events. Due to bacterial mutation and overuse of antimicrobial drugs, multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) has become one of the major causes of postoperative VAP infections in cardiac patients. Therefore, this study aims to explore the risk factors for VAP with MDRO following cardiac surgery in adults.MethodsThe clinical data of adult VAP patients following cardiac surgery in the hospital from Jan 2017 to May 2021 were analyzed retrospectively, and the patients were divided into the MDRO VAP group and the non-MDRO VAP group. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed on risk factors in patients with MDRO VAP. The species and drug sensitivity of pathogens isolated from the VAP patients were also analyzed.ResultsA total of 61 VAP cases were involved in this study, with 34 cases in the MDRO VAP group (55.7%) and 27 cases in the non-MDRO VAP group (44.3%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that independent risk factors for MDRO VAP included preoperative creatinine clearance rate (CCR) ≥ 86.6ml, intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time ≥ 151 min, postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) and nasal feeding. Gram-negative bacilli were the main pathogens in VAP patients (n = 54, 90.0%), with the highest rate of Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 24, 40.0%). Additionally, patients with MDRO VAP had a significantly longer postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) duration and higher hospitalization costs than non-MDRO VAP patients, but there was no notable difference in the 28-day mortality rate between the two groups.ConclusionBased on implementing measures to prevent VAP, clinicians should pay more attention to patients with kidney disease, longer intraoperative CPB time, and postoperative nasal feeding to avoid MDRO infections.

Intraoperative local administration of antibiotics for prevention of sternal wound infection in cardiac surgery

Aim. The article compares the effects of local and systemic use of antibiotics on the incidence of sternal wound infection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.Methods. 485 patients undergoing adult cardiac surgery for the incidence of sternal wound infection were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups who received systemic (cefazolin) and topical (vancomycin, gentamicin) administration of antibiotics for the prevention of sternal wound infection in the postoperative period. The incidence of sternal wound infection depending on the method of application of antibiotics was also assessed.Results. According to the results of the statistical analysis, intraoperative topical application of antibiotics (vancomycin and gentamicin) significantly reduced the cases of sternal wound infection from 7.9 to 0.45% (odds ratio of 1871.9; 95% confidence interval 1.67-2.1×106; p = 0.036). Thus, to improve the efficiency of impact on the pathogenic flora in the wound and to reduce the risk of sternal infection, topical application of antibacterial drugs: vancomycin for the cancellous bone of the sternum, gentamicin for irrigation of tissue during suturing the wound is one of the methods. Conclusion. As a result of the comparative analysis, prevention of sternal wound infection in cardiac patients with intraoperative topical antibiotics is more effective than systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. To reduce the risk of sternal wound infection, topical application of vancomycin as a putty for the cancellous bone of the sternum and gentamicin for irrigation of the soft tissue in the process of wound suturing is recommended.Received 16 August 2016. Accepted 22 November 2016.Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.Financing: The study had no sponsor’s support.

Gentamicin-impregnated collagen sponge for preventing sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery.

The frequency of sternal wound infection (SWI) after cardiac surgery ranges from 0.5% to 8% and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and treatment cost. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is not sufficient to fully prevent the contamination of the surgical access site. One of the most effective methods for the prevention of wound infection seems to be the use of gentamicin-impregnated collagen sponge, which is successfully used in abdominal and orthopedic surgery. Surgically implantable topical antibiotics can reduce wound infection in cardiac patients as well, but the efficacy of SWI prevention in cardiac surgery still raises many questions.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in a cardiac surgical unit.

Increased antibiotic resistance of common bacteria is attributed in part to the widespread use of various antibiotic agents. Prophylactic and therapeutic antibiotic treatments are routinely used in cardiac surgical units, and it is no surprise that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection is becoming a major cause of surgical infections in cardiac patients. We reviewed our experience with patients who underwent cardiac surgery and experienced infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Between 1992 and 2000 at the Montreal Heart Institute, 39 patients had methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surgical infections, and 13,199 patients underwent cardiac surgery. The yearly incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, the relative risk of acute mediastinitis and of superficial wound infections or other types of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection episodes, and the effect of preventive measures were analyzed. The annual incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acute mediastinitis decreased from 0.37% (5/1321) of cardiac patients in 1992 and 0.44% (6/1355) in 1993 to 0% between 1994 and 1997, 0.13% (2/1528) in 1999, and 0% (0/1700) in 2000. The total incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, including mediastinitis, superficial and deep sternal and leg wound infection, and all systemic infection episodes ranged from 0.68% of patients in 1992 and 0.96% of patients in 1993 to 0.46% of patients in 1999 and 0.53% of patients in 2000. The relative risk of severe mediastinal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection to all other methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection episodes decreased from 1.65 in 1992 to 0.41 in 1999 and 0 in 2000. Beginning in 1993, all patients given a diagnosis methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and all nasal carriers of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were strictly isolated on the surgical unit, and vancomycin was used as the prophylactic antibiotic agent for cardiac surgery in these patients. Moreover, since 1998, all patients admitted in the hospital were screened, and nasal carriers were isolated and treated with topical antibiotic ointment. Mediastinal and other infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus have a significant morbidity in cardiac surgical patients. After an outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus mediastinal infections, several preventive measures to control methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contamination of surgical patients were implemented (nasal screening, preventive isolation, application of mupirocin, prophylaxis with vancomycin and alcohol gels) and were effective in decreasing the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and mediastinitis after cardiac surgery.

Procedures associated with infective endocarditis in adults

To assess the relative risk of infective endocarditis associated with various procedures and the protective efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis by a case-control study. Recommendations for the prevention of infective endocarditis are based on the hypothesis of a relationship between procedures and infective endocarditis which is supported by anecdotal reports and data from experimental models. Cases met the Von Reyn's diagnostic criteria modified with echocardiographic and macroscopic findings Controls were recruited from cardiology or medicinal wards. Cases (n = 171) and controls were matched as regards sex, age and underlying cardiac condition. They were requested to indicate all the medical, surgical or dental procedures within the previous 3 months. Among potential confounding factors, infectious episodes and skin wounds in the previous 3 months were reported. Antibiotic prophylaxis administration was documented for type, dosage, duration and administration schedule. Cases significantly more frequently than controls had undergone at least one procedure (matched odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 2.53). Dental procedures considered as a whole were not associated with an increased risk, although scaling and root canal treatment showed a trend towards a higher risk of infective endocarditis (P = 0.065). Among non-dental procedures, only surgery appeared to be at risk (matched odds ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 22). Considering all procedures, the risk of infective endocarditis increased significantly with the number of procedures. While general co-morbid conditions did not differ between the two groups, cases significantly more frequently than controls had experienced an infectious episode or a skin wound. In multivariate analysis, only infectious episodes and skin wounds significantly increased the risk of infective endocarditis. Scaling was the only independent risk factor for viridans streptococcal infective endocarditis. The 46% protective efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis was not significant. Procedures do increase the risk of infective endocarditis. The interpretation of the apparent low risk associated with dental procedures may be as a result of the current practice of antibiotic prophylaxis. Our data suggest that surgery should be more clearly mentioned in future guidelines, and reemphasize that a rigorous treatment of any focal infection in cardiac patients is mandatory. From the efficacy rate of antibiotic prophylaxis,it can be estimated that the overall incidence of infective endocarditis might be reduced by 5 to 10% in France by appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac patients.