Infection Prevention Personnel Research Articles

Best Practices and a Business Case for Surgical Site Infection Prevention.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) can be costly and result in prolonged hospital stays; readmissions; and additional diagnostic tests, therapeutic antibiotic treatments, and surgical procedures. Evidence-based practices for preventing SSIs include environmental cleaning; instrument cleaning, decontamination, and sterilization; preoperative bathing; preoperative Staphylococcus aureus decolonization; intraoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis; hand hygiene; and surgical hand antisepsis. Strong partnerships among infection prevention personnel, perioperative nurses, surgeons, and anesthesia professionals may enhance perioperative infection prevention. Facility and physician-specific SSI rates should be reported to physicians and frontline personnel in a timely, accessible manner. Together with costs associated with SSIs, these data help determine the success of an infection prevention program. Leaders can develop a comprehensive business case proposal for perioperative infection prevention programs. The proposal should describe the need for the program and anticipated return on investment; it also should focus on the goal of decreasing SSIs by establishing metrics for assessing outcomes and addressing barriers.

2161. Pilot Implementation of a Nationwide Automated Multidrug-Resistant Organism Tracking and Alert System in Veterans Affairs

BackgroundRegional spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), can occur when carriers present unbeknownst to healthcare facilities and thereby delay appropriate infection control interventions. Herein, we describe pilot implementation of a novel national system that automatically alerts local facility staff to newly admitted patients with any history of CRE or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in VA.MethodsFrom December 2016 to November 2017, we implemented the alert system in 10 VA medical centers. The system continually monitors the VA Corporate Data Warehouse for new facility admissions nationwide among patients with archived CRE and MRSA data. When such admissions occur, an alert is emailed to Infection Prevention personnel at the local facility. During implementation, we upgraded to a faster, more accurate report, “MDRO Tracker”, that provided alerts within 4 hours of admission. We evaluated system utility in three ways: (1) assessing user data and feedback; (2) comparing a dataset identifying all unique patients harboring CRE and MRSA to the subset of patients whose most recent positive result was identified at a different VA facility; and (3) enrolling a convenience sample of CRE and MRSA patients to validate system accuracy and assess whether the new system or existing infrastructure identified the MDRO first. IRB approval was obtained at each site.ResultsThe number of users increased over time and are shown in Figure 1. User feedback data are shown in Figure 2; 71/256 (28%) responses indicated that alert data were new and/or timely. Of all CRE- and MRSA-positive patients identified during the study period, 11/101 (11%) and 214/2,390 (9%), respectively, had positive MDRO results originating from a different VA facility. Of the 61 CRE and 1,720 MRSA patients enrolled by research staff, 21% (n = 13) of CRE and 7% (n = 71) of MRSA cases were first identified by the automated system. ConclusionThis pilot implementation of a novel automated MDRO alert system shows feasibility and potential for substantial utility of such a system. Further refinement and expanded β-testing of the system is underway.Disclosures M. A. Gelman, Cepheid: Speaker, Speaking Fee.

Infection Prevention and Control Programs in US Nursing Homes: Results of a National Survey

ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to (1) obtain a national perspective of the current state of nursing home (NH) infection prevention and control (IPC) programs and (2) examine differences in IPC program characteristics for NHs that had and had not received an infection control deficiency citation. DesignA national cross-sectional survey of randomly sampled NHs was conducted and responses were linked with Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) and NH Compare data. SettingSurveys were completed and returned by 990 NHs (response rate 39%) between December 2013 and December 2014. ParticipantsThe person in charge of the IPC program at each NH completed the survey. MeasurementsThe survey consisted of 34 items related to respondent demographics, IPC program staffing, stability of the workforce, resources and challenges, and resident care and employee processes. Facility characteristics and infection control deficiency citations were assessed using CASPER and NH Compare data. ResultsMost respondents had at least 2 responsibilities in addition to those related to infection control (54%) and had no specific IPC training (61%). Although many practices and processes were consistent with infection prevention guidelines for NHs, there was wide variation in programs across the United States. Approximately 36% of responding facilities had received an infection control deficiency citation. NHs that received citations had infection control professionals with less experience (P = .01) and training (P = .02) and were less likely to provide financial resources for continuing education in infection control (P = .01). ConclusionThe findings demonstrate that a lack of adequately trained infection prevention personnel is an important area for improvement. Furthermore, there is a need to identify specific evidence-based practices to reduce infection risk in NHs.

Surveillance versus clinical adjudication: Differences persist with new ventilator-associated event definition

The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) has recently supported efforts to shift surveillance away from ventilator-associated pneumonia to ventilator-associated events (VAEs) to decrease subjectivity in surveillance and minimize concerns over clinical correlation. The goals of this study were to compare the results of an automated surveillance strategy using the new VAE definition with a prospectively performed clinical application of the definition. All patients ventilated for ≥2 days in a medical and surgical intensive care unit were evaluated by 2 methods: retrospective surveillance using an automated algorithm combined with manual chart review after the NHSN's VAE methodology and prospective surveillance by pulmonary physicians in collaboration with the clinical team administering care to the patient at the bedside. Overall, a similar number of events were called by each method (69 vs 67). Of the 1,209 patients, 56 were determined to have VAEs by both methods (κ = .81, P = .04). There were 24 patients considered to be a VAE by only 1 of the methods. Most discrepancies were the result of clinical disagreement with the NHSN's VAE methodology. There was good agreement between the study teams. Awareness of the limitations of the surveillance definition for VAE can help infection prevention personnel in discussions with critical care partners about optimal use of these data.

Automated tracking and ordering of precautions for multidrug-resistant organisms

The transmission and infection risk associated with multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) carriers necessitates surveillance and tracking to provide proper contact precautions. As MDROs increase in scope, automated electronic health record (EHR) systems may help with surveillance demands. We created a system for MDROs and Clostridium difficile tracking that automated the following 3 main surveillance and tracking activities: monitoring of microbiology results and initiation of chart-based flags, ordering of contact precautions on admission, and ensuring appropriate removal of precautions. Automation saved 43 infection preventionist hours per 1,000 admissions, in addition to previously unquantified hours spent reviewing MDRO history for every admission. Automatic retiring of certain MDRO flags ensured removal of contact precautions after a specified time. A point-prevalence assessment for eligibility for discontinuation found that all precautions were appropriate, with none eligible for removal. By integrating microbiology data, EHR tracking flags, and automated orders, this system assured rapid and comprehensive placement of patients into contact precautions without requiring oversight by infection prevention personnel. We show that automated systems embedded within EHRs can ensure tracking and application of appropriate contact precautions while simultaneously producing tremendous time savings for infection prevention programs.

Is accounting for acute care beds enough? A proposal for measuring infection prevention personnel resources

There is still little known about how infection prevention (IP) staffing affects patient outcomes across the country. Current evaluations mainly focus on the ratio of IP resources to acute care beds (ACBs) and have not strongly correlated with patient outcomes. The scope of IP and the role of the infection preventionist in health care have expanded and changed dramatically since the Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control (SENIC Project) recommended a 1 IP resource to 250 ACB ration in the 1980s. Without a universally accepted model for accounting for additional IP responsibilities, it is difficult to truly assess IP staffing needs. A previously suggested alternative staffing model was applied to acute care hospitals in our organization to determine its utility.

Is Accounting for Acute Care Beds Enough? A Proposal for Measuring Infection Prevention Personnel Resources

The guideline of one Infection Prevention (IP) professional for every 250 acute care beds has been used by leadership at many facilities since the mid-1980s. The scope of IP programs has expanded greatly since that time without the recommendation being updated. Little is known about how IP programs are staffed across the country. Staffing ratios appear to differ greatly between the eleven hospitals in a Midwestern healthcare system.

Infection Control Link Nurse Program: An interdisciplinary approach in targeting health care-acquired infection

We describe a successful interdisciplinary liaison program that effectively reduced health care-acquired (HCA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a university hospital setting. Baseline was from January 2006 to March 2008, and intervention period was April 2008 to September 2009. Staff nurses were trained to be liaisons (link nurses) to infection prevention (IP) personnel with clearly defined goals assigned and with ongoing monthly education. HCA-MRSA incidence per 1,000 patient-days (PD) was compared between baseline and intervention period along with total and non-HCA-MRSA, HCA and non-HCA-MRSA bacteremia, and hand soap/sanitizer usage. Hand hygiene compliance was assessed. A reduction in MRSA rates was as follows in intervention period compared with baseline: HCA-MRSA decreased by 28% from 0.92 to 0.67 cases per 1,000 PD (incidence rate ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.62-0.83, P < .001), and HCA-MRSA bacteremia rate was reduced by 41% from 0.18 to 0.10 per 1,000 PD (incidence rate ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.84, P = .003). Total MRSA rate and MRSA bacteremia rate also showed significant reduction with nonsignificant reductions in overall non-HCA-MRSA and non-HCA-MRSA bacteremia. Hand soap/sanitizer usage and compliance with hand hygiene also increased significantly during IP. Link nurse program effectively reduced HCA-MRSA. Goal-defined metrics with ongoing re-education for the nurses by IP personnel helped drive these results.

Public Health Surveillance in the Dialysis Setting: Opportunities and Challenges for Using Electronic Health Records

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has conducted public health surveillance for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in dialysis facilities since the 1970s, evolving from facility-level surveys to patient-level surveillance systems. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recently implemented incentives for all end-stage renal disease (ESRD) facilities to monitor and report patient-level quality indicators to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) in accordance with the NHSN Dialysis Event Protocol. These CMS incentives have led to a rapid increase in dialysis facility NHSN enrollment during 2012. Ongoing challenges to HAI surveillance in this setting include variability in the surveillance process, assurance of data quality, and staff time and resource requirements. Use of existing electronic health records (EHR), especially in conjunction with detection algorithms, has increasingly been shown to produce valid and reliable estimates of HAI frequency in acute care hospitals. Given the large number of dialysis facilities that are now beginning to conduct surveillance using NHSN, the typical lack of dedicated infection prevention personnel in those facilities, and the widespread use of EHR in large dialysis provider organizations, the use of EHR will probably become a cornerstone of surveillance in these settings. Implemented properly, the use of EHR to support public health surveillance has enormous potential to focus and strengthen infection prevention activities in dialysis facilities. Systematic, ongoing validation efforts will be vital to ensure that reported data are accurate, permit valid comparisons of facility performance, and effectively support improved outcomes for dialysis patients.

Perceived strength of evidence supporting practices to prevent health care-associated infection: Results from a national survey of infection prevention personnel

Limited data exist describing the perceived strength of evidence behind practices to prevent common health care-associated infections (HAIs). We conducted a national survey of infection prevention personnel to assess perception of the evidence for various preventive practices. We were also curious whether lead infection preventionist certification in infection prevention and control (CIC) correlated with perceptions of the evidence. In 2009, we mailed surveys to 703 infection prevention personnel using a national random sample of US hospitals and all Veterans Affairs hospitals; the response rate was 68%. The survey asked the respondent to grade the strength of evidence behind prevention practices. We considered "strong" evidence as being 4 and 5 on a Likert scale. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations between CIC status and the perceived strength of the evidence. The following practices were perceived by 90% or more of respondents as having strong evidence: alcohol-based hand rub, aseptic urinary catheter insertion, chlorhexidine for antisepsis prior to central venous catheter insertion, maximum sterile barriers during central venous catheter insertion, avoiding the femoral site for central venous catheter insertion, and semirecumbent positioning of the ventilated patient. CIC status was significantly associated with the perception of the evidence for several practices. Successful implementation of evidence-based practices should consider how key individuals in the translational process assess the strength of that evidence.

One-day point prevalence of emerging bacterial pathogens in four secondary and five tertiary care German hospitals - results from a pilot study of the German Society for Hospital Hygiene (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Krankenhaushygiene, DGKH).

Objective: Data on the prevalence of emerging bacterial pathogens like extended-spectrum-lactamase-building (ESBL) Gram negative organisms, multiresistant Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter species or toxin-building Clostridium difficile in German hospitals are sparse. To provide data for different regions in Germany, a one-day point prevalence study with five tertiary care hospitals and four secondary care hospitals was conducted on the 10th of February 2010.Method: For participating hospitals, the level of care (primary/secondary/tertiary), staffing with infection prevention personnel, availability of a MRSA-screening, microbiological support and the prevalence of five emerging bacterial pathogens in intensive care, surgical and medical wards was assessed by questionnaire.Results: Overall, 3411 patients were included. In tertiary hospitals, the following prevalences were given: MRSA 1.8%, ESBL E. coli 0.45%, ESBL Klebsiella spp. 0.41%, multiresistant Pseudomonas 0.53%, multiresistant Acinetobacter species 0.15%, VRE 0.49% und Clostridium difficile 1.01%. In secondary hospitals, as prevalences resulted for MRSA 3.48%, ESBL E. coli 0.4%, ESBL Klebsiella spp. 0.4%, multiresistant Pseudomonas 0%, multiresistant Acinetobacter species 0%, VRE 0.13% und Clostridium difficile 1.34%.Discussion: The prevalence of MRSA found is comparable to other prevalence studies published in the last years, but remarkably higher than reported by the German National Surveillance System (KISS). As no prevalence data for other pathogens as MRSA could be found, only data from the ITS-KISS are available for comparison. Again, the prevalences found in the present study are much higher than reported by the KISS. Whether this is by chance or indicates a systematic underreporting in the KISS remains unclear.Conclusion: The results from this one day point prevalence study show that prevalences of emerging bacterial pathogens differ markedly between regions, departments and hospitals. This can be explained by regional, methodical and other difference associated with the level of care provided by these hospitals. Still, the prevalences found fit well to other prevalence studies from the last years but are remarkably higher than to be expected by the KISS. As questionnaire-based one-day prevalence studies have been shown to be inexpensive and feasible, such studies, using a fixed day and protocol, should be extendedly used in the future to collect representative data for Germany. By such initiatives, scientific societies as the DGKH can take part in collecting valuable epidemiological data of emerging bacterial pathogens.

Influenza Vaccination among Healthcare Workers: Ten-Year Experience of a Large Healthcare Organization

To describe the results of different measures implemented to improve adherence to the healthcare worker (HCW) influenza immunization program at BJC HealthCare during the period from 1997 through 2007. Descriptive retrospective study. BJC HealthCare, a 13-hospital nonprofit healthcare organization in the Midwest. We reviewed and analyzed HCW influenza vaccination data from all BJC HealthCare Occupational Health Services and hospitals during the period from 1997 through 2007. Occupational health staff, infection prevention personnel, and key influenza vaccination campaign leaders were also interviewed regarding implementation measures during the study years. At the end of 2007, BJC HealthCare had approximately 26,000 employees. With the use of multiple progressive interventions, influenza vaccination rates among BJC employees increased from 45% in 1997 to 72% in 2007 (P < .001). The influenza vaccination rate in 2007 was significantly higher than in 2006: 72%, compared with 54% (P < .001). Five hospitals had influenza vaccination rates that exceeded the target goal of 80% in 2007. The most successful interventions were adding influenza vaccination rates to the quality scorecard incentive program and the use of declination statements, both of which were implemented in 2007. The most important barriers to success identified by interview respondents were HCWs' misconceptions about influenza vaccination and a perceived lack of leadership support. Influenza vaccination rates among HCWs significantly improved with multiple interventions over the years. However, the BJC HealthCare influenza vaccination target of 80% was not attained at all hospitals with these measures. More aggressive interventions, such as implementing mandatory influenza vaccination policies, are needed to achieve higher vaccination rates.