Infection Prevention And Control Measures Research Articles

Successful control of an environmental reservoir of NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae associated with nosocomial transmissions in a low-incidence setting

BackgroundThe hospital wastewater system has been reported as a source of nosocomial acquisition of carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in various settings. Cleaning and disinfection protocols or replacement of contaminated equipment often fail to eradicate these environmental reservoirs, which can lead to long-term transmission of CPE. We report a successful multimodal approach to control a New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase positive Klebsiella pneumoniae (NDM-KP) nosocomial outbreak implicating contamination of sink traps in a low-incidence setting.MethodsFollowing the incidental identification of NDM-KP in a urine culture of an inpatient, we performed an epidemiological investigation, including patient and environmental CPE screening, and whole genome sequencing (WGS) of strains. We also implemented multimodal infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, namely the isolation of cases, waterless patient care, replacement of contaminated P-traps and connecting pieces, and bleach and steam disinfection of sinks for 6 months, followed by patient and environmental screenings for eradication.ResultsBetween February and May 2022, five NDM-KP cases were identified in an eight-bed neurosurgical intermediate care unit. Among the eight sink traps of the unit, three were positive for NDM-KP. Patient and environmental isolates belonged to multilocus sequence typing ST-268. All isolate genomes were genetically very similar suggesting cross-transmission and a potential role of the environment as the source of transmissions. Following the introduction of combined IPC measures, no new case was subsequently detected and sink traps remained negative for NDM-KP within 6 months after the intervention.ConclusionThe implementation of multimodal IPC measures, including waterless patient care combined with the replacement and disinfection of P-traps and connecting pieces, was successful in the control of NDM-KP after eight months. In a low-incidence setting, this approach has made it possible to pursue the objective of zero transmission of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE).

The role and needs of teachers/schools in infection, prevention and control post covid-19

Abstract Introduction COVID-19 highlighted the importance of infection prevention and control (IPC) across all settings. As children are important transmitters of infection, teachers and schools play an important role in infection prevention. The aim of this study is to understand attitudes towards, and knowledge of IPC in schools post-Covid, and highlight any gaps in the training and resources needed. Methods An online survey of 1000 primary and secondary school teachers was carried out across England. Pearson’s chi-squared test, corrected for survey design, was used to test for differences in proportions across levels of categorical variables. Two qualitative workshops with eight head teachers were carried out to gather more in-depth information. Results 1000 teachers completed the survey across a range of teaching roles. Respondents reported that IPC measures are now less frequently implemented than during the pandemic. 71% of respondents say their role has changed since the pandemic, now having more responsibility for pupil health and hygiene; higher in primary versus secondary school teachers (31% v 25%; p < 0.05). 1/3 felt this change was permanent; 84% had no IPC training. Knowledge gaps were identified in the areas of IPC roles within schools, and IPC measures. 72% teachers claim they feel better prepared to deal with a public health outbreak compared to pre-pandemic, although 22% do not have an updated IPC policy; 35% had unmet needs. Conclusions Schools and teachers play a pivotal role in preventing the spread of communicable disease, highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Teachers need, and more importantly want, more IPC training. Training and updated policies would support the educational workforce who feel their needs are not being met. Providing more streamlined, consistent, clear and concise information from trusted sources is required. Key messages • It is imperative to understand educators’ role in IPC in schools as they are key players in supporting local and national efforts to reduce the spread of infections. • Teachers desire further training with comprehensive information, and up-to-date policies to support their infection prevention and control efforts in educational settings.

Safely reopening and operating a primary healthcare facility after closure due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in a healthcare worker – Nairobi, Kenya, 2020

The first COVID-19 case in a healthcare worker in Kenya was reported on March 30, 2020, in Nairobi, leading to a 41-day closure of the health facility where he had worked. We assessed infection prevention and control (IPC) activities and implemented recommendations to re-open and operate the facility. We conducted a risk assessment of the facility in April 2020 using a modified World Health Organization, six-element IPC facility risk assessment tool. IPC recommendations were made, and a follow-up assessment of their implementation was conducted in July 2020. Breaches in IPC measures included poor ventilation in most service delivery areas; lack of physical distancing between patients; inadequate COVID-19 information, education, and communication materials; lack of standard operating procedures on cleaning and disinfecting high-touch areas; insufficient IPC training; inadequate hand hygiene facilities; insufficient personal protective equipment supplies; and an inactive IPC committee. Strengthening IPC measures is critical to prevent healthcare facility closures.

Home-based nursing care: what do we know about multidrug-resistant organisms in this setting?

Abstract Background The burden and complexity of home-based nursing care have intensified due to earlier discharges from hospitals and patients living longer at home with increasing co-morbidities. This growing population of vulnerable patients, combined with the worldwide increase in the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), poses a new burden on home-based nursing staff. Home-based nursing care differs significantly from hospitals and nursing homes, challenging implementation of infection prevention and control (IPC) measures. It is therefore important to gain insight into the attitudes, experiences and needs of home-based nursing staff. Also, to better understand the scope of MDRO carriage and transmission in this setting, including its challenges. Methods Cross-sectional studies were conducted in the Netherlands including a survey and focusgroup study among home-based nursing staff, supplemented by a report of cases of MDRO clusters. Results We have identified several factors adding to the complexity of responding to an MDRO outbreak with involvement of home-based nursing care. First, inapplicable recommendations in guidelines/protocols or from infection preventionists, often aimed at intramural care. Second, nursing staff questioned the proportionality of IPC measures, potentially influenced by behaviour of colleagues and patients. Third, inadequate information transfers about patients carrying MDROs. Fourth, uncertainty about the roles and responsibilities of involved healthcare professionals. Finally, the need for organisational support in providing education and sufficient resources, and clarity about financial aspects. Conclusions Insights from these studies have aided in aligning upcoming MDRO guidelines for home-based nursing care in the Netherlands, which factor in the above mentioned complexity. Furthermore, these findings can aid in future strategies to prevent or respond early in MDRO outbreaks with involvement of home-based nursing care.

Artificial intelligence for training and reporting infection prevention measures in critical wards.

Healthcare associated infections (HAI) are a major concern. Infections and sepsis are prevalent causes of prolonged hospitalization, healthcare resources consumption, and mortality. Infection prevention and control (IPC) measures need to be encouraged with the purpose to become standard protocol. Hand hygiene represents the most important measure to prevent the spread of infections. Poor hand hygiene is often due to: the belief that the use of gloves replaces hand hygiene, lack of good example from colleagues and superiors, sinks that are difficult to access or insufficient in number, staff often too busy / not enough time, poor knowledge of guidelines and protocols. Artificial intelligence was recently integrated in hand washing devices; this can implement training on a daily basis but also is an objective method to assess the efficacy of the IPC measures adopted. The benefit–cost ratio of this approach needs to be discussed.

Stigma relating to tuberculosis infection prevention and control implementation in rural health facilities in South Africa — a qualitative study outlining opportunities for mitigation

BackgroundTuberculosis (TB) is a stigmatised disease with intersectional associations with poverty, HIV, transmission risk and mortality. The use of visible TB infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, such as masks or isolation, can contribute to stigma.MethodsTo explore stigma in this condition, we conducted in-depth individual interviews with 18 health workers and 15 patients in the rural Eastern Cape of South Africa using a semi-structured interview guide and narrative approach. We used reflexive thematic analysis guided by line-by-line coding. We then interpreted these key findings using Link and Phelan’s theoretical model of stigma, related this to stigma mitigation recommendations from participants and identified levels of intervention with the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework.ResultsParticipants shared narratives of how TB IPC measures can contribute to stigma, with some describing feeling ‘less than human’. We found TB IPC measures sometimes exacerbated stigma, for example through introducing physical isolation that became prolonged or through a mask marking the person out as being ill with TB. In this context, stigma emerged from the narrow definition of what mask-wearing symbolises, in contrast with broader uses of masks as a preventative measure. Patient and health workers had contrasting perspectives on the implications of TB IPC-related stigma, with patients focussing on communal benefit, while health workers focussed on the negative impact on the health worker-patient relationship. Participant recommendations to mitigate TB IPC-related stigma included comprehensive information on TB IPC measures, respectful communication between health workers and patients, shifting the focus of TB IPC messages to communal safety (which could draw on ubuntu, a humanist framework) and using universal IPC precautions instead of measures targeted at someone with infectious TB.ConclusionsHealth facilities may unwittingly perpetuate stigma through TB IPC implementation, but they also have the potential to reduce it. Evoking ‘ubuntu’ as an African humanist conceptual framework could provide a novel perspective to guide future TB IPC stigma mitigation interventions, including policy changes to universal IPC precautions.

Comparative analysis of hospital-acquired and community-acquired infections at a tertiary hospital in China before and during COVID-19: A 7-year longitudinal study (2017-2023)

This 7-year longitudinal survey (2017-2023) assessed the point prevalence of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) and community-acquired infections (CAIs) at a first-class tertiary hospital in China, both prior to and during the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Patients were stratified into prepandemic and pandemic periods, as well as into stringent and relaxed infection prevention and control (IPC) phases, to compare the point prevalence of HAIs and CAIs. The overall point prevalence of HAIs was 1.50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32%-1.71%), showing a significant downward trend (P=.021). Among patients receiving pathogen testing, the point prevalence of HAIs significantly declined during the pandemic (6.26% vs9.89%, P<.001). The point prevalence of CAIs demonstrated a notable increase in 2023 compared with 2020 to 2022 among pathogen-tested patients (81.37% vs74.18%, P=.001). Multivariate analysis identified hospitalization during the pandemic as a protective factor against HAIs (adjusted odds ratio 0.49, 95% CI, 0.36-0.67). The comprehensive IPC strategy implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic at this tertiary hospital significantly reduced the point prevalence of HAIs. However, CAIs exhibited a rising trend following the relaxation of COVID-19 IPC measures.

Healthcare workers’ compliance with COVID-19 prevention and control measures at De Martino Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundHealthcare workers are a high-risk group for COVID-19 and protecting them is crucial for healthcare delivery. Limited studies have explored compliance with infection prevention and control (IPC) practices among Somali healthcare workers. This study aimed to determine compliance with IPC practices among healthcare workers in De Martino Public Hospital, Somalia.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at the De Martino Public Hospital, Mogadishu, Somalia from August to October 2022, with the participation of 204 healthcare workers (response rate = 97%). Compliance was assessed using responses to 25 questions on a five-point Likert-type scale, and a median score of 20 was used to dichotomize compliance scores. A chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were performed to check the associations between healthcare workers’ socio-demographic information, IPC-related factors, work conditions and practices on COVID-19, and IPC compliance during healthcare interventions using SPSS 23 version.ResultsIn total, 58.3% of the participants had good compliance with IPC. There were significant associations between IPC compliance and the type of healthcare worker (doctors and doctor assistants: 72.3%, nurses and paramedical staff: 67.3%, non-clinical staff: 5.7%, p < 0.01). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, compared to non-clinical staff, doctors and doctor assistants (OR: 12.11, 95% CI: 2.23–65.84) and nurses and paramedical staff (OR: 21.38, 95% CI: 4.23–108.01) had higher compliance with IPC measures. There were no significant associations between compliance and sex, marital status, vaccination status, or smoking (p > 0.05 for all).ConclusionsLow levels of compliance with COVID-19 IPC measures were observed among hospital workers. Prioritizing awareness campaigns and behavior change interventions, especially among non-clinical staff, is crucial for effective COVID-19 infection prevention and control within hospitals.

Knowledge, attitudes, and readiness about critical antimicrobial resistant organisms among healthcare workers at colonial war memorial hospital in Fiji: a pre and post intervention study

BackgroundGram-negative bacteria resistant to carbapenems are also known as critical antimicrobial resistant organisms. Their emergence at Colonial War Memorial Hospital (CWMH), the largest hospital in Fiji, is a major clinical concern. This study was conducted to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and readiness of healthcare workers (HCW) at CWMH regarding management of patients with infections caused by critical antimicrobial resistant organisms.MethodsA questionnaire was designed using a Likert scale to assess knowledge, attitudes, and readiness. Two cross-sectional studies were conducted, before and after the implementation of targeted educational activities which were informed by the pre-intervention study findings.ResultsA total of 393 and 420 HCW participated in the pre- and post-intervention studies, respectively. The majority of respondents were female (77.3%) and 18–34 years of age (67%). HCW professional roles included nurses (56.3%), doctors (31.6%), and laboratory personnel (12.2%). In the post-intervention study, significantly more HCW reported having received infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial resistance education and training (26.8% in pre to 45.5% in post intervention, p < 0.001). The majority of nurses and doctors (> 85% to ≥ 95%) were aware of how AMR organisms spread in healthcare settings and knew the IPC measures to prevent transmission of AMR infections including hand hygiene, standard and transmission-based precautions. Attitudes towards AMR were positive, with 84.2% pre intervention and 84.8% of HCW post intervention expressing their willingness to change their work environment to assist with AMR prevention. Perceived readiness to address the problem showed mixed results. Improvements in laboratory AMR surveillance data availability were noted (29.4–52.4%, p < 0001). Modest improvement in the hospital’s capacity for outbreak response (44–51.9%, p = 0.01), and treatment of AMR infections (38.9–44.4%, p = 0.01) was reported.ConclusionsOur data revealed high levels of staff awareness and knowledge about AMR and IPC. However, readiness for outbreak response and treatment of critical AMR infections requires more attention. Improving AMR prevention and containment in CWMH will likely require sustained and multisectoral interventions with strong administrative commitment.

Assessing ventilation through ambient carbon dioxide concentrations across multiple healthcare levels in Ghana.

Infection prevention and control (IPC) measures safeguard primary healthcare systems, especially as the infectious disease landscape evolves due to climate and environmental change, increased global mobility, and vaccine hesitancy and inequity, which can introduce unexpected pathogens. This study explores the importance of an "always-on," low-cost IPC approach, focusing on the role of natural ventilation in health facilities, particularly in low-resource settings. Ambient carbon dioxide (CO2) levels are increasingly used as a measure of ventilation effectiveness allowing for spot checks and targeted ventilation improvements. Data were collected through purposive sampling in Northern Ghana over a three-month period. Levels of CO2 ppm (parts per million) were measured by a handheld device in various healthcare settings, including Community-Based Health Planning and Services (CHPS) facilities, municipal and teaching hospitals, and community settings to assess ventilation effectiveness. Analyses compared CO2 readings in community and hospital settings as well as in those settings with and without natural ventilation. A total of 40 facilities were evaluated in this study; 90% were healthcare facilities and 75% had natural ventilation (with an open window, door or wall). Facilities that relied on natural ventilation were mostly community health centers (60% vs 0%) and more commonly had patients present (83% vs 40%) compared with facilities without natural ventilation. Facilities with natural ventilation had significantly lower CO2 concentrations (CO2 ppm: 663 vs 1378, p = 0.0043) and were more likely to meet international thresholds of CO2 < 800 ppm (87% vs 10%, p = <0.0001) and CO2 < 1000 ppm (97% vs 20%, p = <0.0001). The adjusted odds ratio of low CO2 in the natural facilities compared with non-natural were: odds ratios, OR (95% CI): 21.7 (1.89, 247) for CO2 < 800 ppm, and 16.8 (1.55, 183) for CO2 < 1000 ppm. Natural ventilation in these facilities was consistently significantly associated with higher likelihood of low CO2 concentrations. Improved ventilation represents one cost-effective layer of IPC. This study highlights the continuing role natural ventilation can play in health facility design in community health care clinics. Most health facilities met standard CO2 thresholds, particularly in community health facilities. Further research is needed to optimize the use of natural ventilation. The use of a handheld devices to track a simple metric, CO2 levels, could improve appreciation of ventilation among healthcare workers and public health professionals and allow for them to target improvements. This study highlights potential lessons in the built environment of community primary health facilities as a blueprint for low-cost, integrated multi-layer IPC measures to mitigate respiratory illness and anticipate future outbreaks.

Regional variation in the interpretation of contact precautions for multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a cross-sectional survey

Contact precautions are recommended when caring for patients with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE), carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CPPA), and extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E). Our aim was to determine the interpretation of contact precautions and associatedinfection prevention and control (IPC) measures in the non-ICU hospital settingfor patients with CPE, CPPA or ESBL-E in 11 hospitals in the Southwest of the Netherlands. A cross-sectional survey was developed to collect information on all implemented IPC measures, including use of personal protective equipment, IPC measures for visitors, cleaning and disinfection, precautions during outpatient care and follow-up strategies. All 11 hospitals were invited to participate between November 2020 and April 2021. The survey was filled together with each hospital. All hospitals installed isolation precautions for patients with CPE and CPPA during inpatient care and day admissions, whereas 10 hospitals (90.9%) applied isolation precautions for patients with ESBL-E. Gloves and gowns were always used during physical contact with the patient in isolation. Large variations were identified in IPC measures for visitors, cleaning and disinfection products used, and precautions during outpatient care. Four hospitals (36.4%) actively followed up on CPE or CPPA patients with the aim of declaring them CPE- or CPPA-negative as timely as possible, and two hospitals (20.0%) actively followed up on ESBL-E patients. Contact precautions are interpreted differently between hospitals, leading to regional differences in IPC measures applied in clinical settings. Harmonizing infection-control policies between the hospitals could facilitate patient transfers and benefit collective efforts of preventing transmission of multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Whole Genome Sequencing for the Identification of a Streptococcus agalactiae Outbreak in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Background: While Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus [GBS]) infections in infants usually result from maternal transmission, healthcare-associated cases, particularly in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), can occur. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) can aid in investigating GBS outbreaks among infants in hospital settings. The aim of the study is to describe the investigation of GBS infections in NICU using WGS. Methods: Infection prevention and control (IPAC) at our hospital monitors the occurrence of late-onset GBS disease (LOD) in our 57-bed NICU, which consists of all private rooms. The occurrence of 2 cases of LOD within 2 weeks triggered an investigation, including WGS of the two isolates and isolates causing invasive GBS during the last 6 months in the unit. GBS isolates underwent WGS using Illumina at Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory. All affected patients underwent chart-review. Outbreak description and investigation: In August 2023, two NICU neonates (patients 2,3) experienced LOD two weeks apart, one with bacteremic meningitis and the other with two bacteremic episodes three weeks apart. While WGS was pending two additional cases of late-onset GBS bacteremia (patients 4,5) occurred. Isolates from Pts 2,3 and 5 were indistinguishable from each other and from an isolate from an infant admitted to the NICU with early onset bacteremia on July 27, 2023 (day 1 of life) (patient 1). Weekly point prevalence for throat and rectal colonization over 3 weeks identified five infants colonized with unrelated strains. An additional long-stay infant (patient 6) developed GBS conjunctivitis due to a strain indistinguishable from (patient 4) by pulse field gel electrophoresis, WGS for the second cluster is pending. IPAC interventions: Lapses in IPAC practices were observed, with no commonalities among cases other than similar geographic location within the unit. We hypothesized transmission was due to horizontal transmission between babies due to these lapses. Basic IPAC measures, including hand hygiene and environmental cleaning, were reinforced; Additional Precautions were not used due to private rooms’ unit structure. No environmental samples were taken due to lack of an obvious environmental point or common source. Point prevalence monitoring persisted until no new cases related to the outbreak strains were further identified in three consecutive weekly point prevalence. Conclusions: Increased awareness of healthcare-associated transmission is crucial in NICU as LOD GBS emerges. WGS plays a key role in identifying transmission. Detecting a multi-strain outbreak can appropriately redirect investigations. Legend: Figure 1: Timeline of stay at NICU and infection timing for patients 1-6

Managerial Influence on Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) Implementation in Israeli Hospitals: A Doctoral Research Study

Background: This research, part of a doctoral study, aims to examine the impact of managerial factors on the implementation of Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) measures in Israeli hospitals. The study focuses on identifying key facilitators and barriers from the perspectives of physician and nurse managers, with an emphasis on understanding the integration of managerial strategies and theoretical frameworks in IPC implementation. Objective: The objective is to explore specific managerial factors, both facilitators and barriers, influencing the effective implementation of IPC measures. The research investigates these influences through the lens of physicians and nurses managing IPC units in public hospital settings. Methodology: A mixed-method approach was adopted, involving in-depth interviews with ten IPC-Unit managers (five physicians and five nurses) and a comprehensive questionnaire distributed among IPC-Unit heads. The study’s demographic and professional profiles of participants are detailed in Table 1. The data collection process encompassed an Activity Assessment Questionnaire (2-AAQ) and an Organizational Change Implementation Questionnaire (3-OrgChangeImplQ), with the distribution of responses categorized by implementation stages and sociological theories (Tables 2-4). Result: Managerial autonomy emerged as a significant catalyst for IPC implementation, with supportive leadership and resource allocation being critical. Differences in approaches between physician and nurse managers were observed, reflecting diverse strategies in planning, execution, monitoring, and maintenance of IPC measures. The findings also revealed a natural alignment with sociological theories, particularly Normalization Process Theory (NPT) and Diffusion of Innovations (DOI), despite a lack of formal training in these areas. Conclusions: The study underscores the multifaceted nature of IPC implementation, highlighting the importance of managerial autonomy, supportive leadership, and a deep understanding of organizational culture. The inherent alignment of IPC strategies with NPT and DOI theories suggests the potential of these frameworks in guiding IPC implementation. The research advocates for the integration of these theoretical perspectives into formal training programs to enhance the effectiveness of IPC measures in healthcare settings.

First Detected Transmission of C. auris within a Minnesota Healthcare Facility Following Exposure in the Emergency Department

Background: Candida auris reporting and submission of confirmed or possible isolates has been mandatory in Minnesota since August 2019. On August 9, 2023, the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) was notified of a C. auris isolate in hip tissue from a patient in acute care hospital A (ACH-A). Only 9 cases of C. auris were detected prior to August 2023, in Minnesota, and all from patients with a history of international healthcare or healthcare in endemic C. auris locations of the United States. Methods: The MDH Public Health Laboratory (MDH-PHL) confirmed identification of C. auris from the ACH-A isolate by MALDI-TOF. MDH partnered with ACH-A to review medical records, assess infection prevention and control (IPC) practices, conduct contact tracing, and identify patients for colonization screening. Screening was performed on all patients that overlapped with the index case (case A) and were admitted to a facility in the same healthcare system as ACH-A. Facilities accepting discharged patients who overlapped with case A were contacted for colonization screening. Overlapping patients, no longer admitted to a healthcare facility, were sent a notification letter, and offered outpatient screening. Composite axilla/groin swabs were screened for C. auris using real-time PCR at MDH-PHL, who also performed whole genome sequencing (WGS) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis. Results: Case A’s medical record showed only Minnesota healthcare exposures, a surgical procedure in June 2023 and indicated the case overlapped with a previous case (case B) from July 2023, who had recent international healthcare. The two cases were hospitalized at ACH-B July 12-18, on different care floors without evident links to shared services. However, the cases were in adjacent rooms in ACH-B Emergency Department (ED) on July 3 for 5 hours, when C. auris status of case B was unknown. WGS indicated both isolates were within clade I (South Asian) and separated by 2 SNPs, suggesting relatedness. Extensive colonization screening occurred among 109 potentially exposed patients, including 18 patients from the ED. No additional C. auris was detected. Conclusions: This case represents the first detected transmission of C. auris within a Minnesota healthcare facility. The role of C. auris transmission within the ED is not well understood. Medical record review in combination with WGS analysis suggests potential transmission within the ED. Clinicians should be aware of the risks for C. auris transmission in the ED and follow all IPC measures to prevent transmission of this emerging fungal pathogen.

Infection prevention and control in Dutch general practices before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and its implications for pandemic preparedness and seasonal respiratory epidemics: a qualitative study on lessons learned

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has prompted a re-evaluation of infection prevention and control (IPC) in general practices, highlighting the need for comprehensive IPC implementation. This study aimed to evaluate healthcare workers’ (HCWs) experiences and perspectives regarding IPC in general practices before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and its implications for post-pandemic IPC implementation.MethodsThis qualitative study involved semi-structured, in-depth interviews during two time periods: (1) prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (July 2019-February 2020), involving 14 general practitioners (GPs) and medical assistants; and (2) during the COVID-19 pandemic (July 2022-February 2023), including 22 GPs and medical assistants. Data analysis included thematic analysis that addressed multiple system levels.ResultsFindings indicated a shift towards comprehensive IPC implementation and organisation during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period. Since the Omicron variant, some general practices maintained a broad set of IPC measures, while others released most measures. HCWs’ future expectations on post-pandemic IPC implementation varied: some anticipated reduced implementation due to the desire to return to the pre-pandemic standard, while others expected IPC to be structurally scaled up during seasonal respiratory epidemics. Main contextual challenges included patient cooperation, staff shortages (due to infection), shortages of IPC materials/equipment, and frequently changing and ambiguous guidelines. Key lessons learned were enhanced preparedness (e.g., personal protective equipment supply), and a new perspective on care organisation (e.g., digital care). Main recommendations reported by HCWs were to strengthen regional collaboration within primary care, and between primary care, public health, and secondary care.ConclusionHCWs’ experiences, perspectives and recommendations provide insights to enhance preparedness for future epidemics and pandemics, and sustain IPC in general practices. For IPC improvement strategies, adopting an integrated system-based approach that encompasses actions across multiple levels and engages multiple stakeholders is recommended.

Evaluation of the practice of reprocessing ORs in German hospitals from an infection prevention and control perspective.

The aim of this study was to analyze the cleaning and disinfection of operating rooms (ORs) status quo focusing on hygiene plans in German hospitals. In 2016, a structured online survey was sent to infection prevention and control (IPC) specialists at the cost calculation hospitals of the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) and all university hospitals in Germany (n = 365). With a response rate of 27.4%, 78% stated that written hygiene plans were available. After cleaning and disinfecting an OR with a "septic" patient, 55% waited until surfaces were dry before reusing in accordance with national recommendations, 27% waited > 30min. Additionally, 28% of hospitals had ORs only for "septic" patients. In 56% "septic" patients were only operated on at the end of the program. Postoperative monitoring of patients with bacteria with special IPC requirements took place in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) (29%), operating room (OR) (52%), intensive care unit (ICU) (53%), and in the intermediate care unit (IMC) (19%). Despite written hygiene plans in place the partly long duration of OR nonuse time following IPC measures, the consistent continued use of stratification for "septic" patients and the postoperative follow-up care of patients with colonizing/infecting bacteria with special IPC requirements in the OR and high care areas represent relevant potential for improvement.

Thoughts on and Proposal for the Education, Training, and Recruitment of Infectious Disease Specialists.

The global pandemic of COVID-19 has underscored the significance of establishing and sustaining a practical and efficient infection control system for the benefit and welfare of society. Infectious disease (ID) specialists are expected to take on leadership roles in enhancing organizational infrastructures for infection prevention and control (IPC) at the hospital, community, and national levels. However, due to an absolute shortage and an uneven distribution, many core hospitals currently lack the ID specialists. Given the escalating global risk of emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases as well as antimicrobial resistance pathogens, the education and training of ID specialists constitutes an imperative concern. As demonstrated by historical changes in the healthcare reimbursement system, the establishment and enhancement of IPC measures is pivotal to ensuring medical safety. The existing structure of academic society-driven certification and training initiatives for ID specialists, contingent upon the discretionary decisions of individual physicians, possesses both quantitative and qualitative shortcomings. In this article, I first address the present situations and challenges related to ID specialists and then introduce my idea of securing ID specialists based on the new concepts and platforms; (i) ID Specialists as National Credentials, (ii) Establishment of the Department of Infectious Diseases in Medical and Graduate Schools, (iii) Endowed ID Educative Courses Funded by Local Government and Pharmaceutical Companies, and (iv) Recruitment of Young Physicians Engaged in Healthcare Services in Remote Areas. As clarified by the COVID-19 pandemic, ID specialists play a crucial role in safeguarding public health. Hopefully, this article will advance the discussion and organizational reform for the education and training of ID specialists.

Assessment of Healthcare Workers' Adherence to Infection Prevention and Control Measures in Najran City, Saudi Arabia, in the Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Era

Infection prevention and control (IPC) standards have a unique role in controlling infection transmission. In Saudi Arabia, every healthcare facility is required to establish an IPC program to identify and reduce the risk of infection acquisition and transmission. This study aimed to estimate adherence to IPC measures after the COVID-19 pandemic among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Najran City, Saudi Arabia. This cross-sectional study was conducted among HCWs in Najran City during the period of May to August 2023. A self-administered questionnaire was given to HCWs consisting of three parts: demographic data, profile of healthcare facility and healthcare professional regarding infection control, and questionnaire to assess the adherence of HCWs regarding infection control measures. The study recruited 580 HCWs, of whom 57.6% were males, and 46.6% were aged between 31 and 40 years. The overall mean adherence score was 103.2±9.71 out of 150 points. Accordingly, 88.4% were classified as having moderate adherence, 10.2% were good, and only 1.4% were classified as having poor adherence. Some of the factors associated with increased adherence to IPC measures, include being female, being a nurse, being a practitioner, working in the hospital emergency department, and having a recognized antimicrobial stewardship program team/unit at a healthcare facility. There was satisfactory adherence among HCWs regarding infection prevention and control measures. Being a female, a nurse, a practitioner, working in a hospital emergency department, being a staff of a non-MOH (Ministry of Health) hospital, and having a recognized antimicrobial stewardship program team/unit were identified as significant predictors of increased adherence. IPC measures can be optimized by setting up institutional IPC teams, necessary PPE, and periodic provision of IPC training.

Assessment of Infection Control Practices among Healthcare Workers Working at Tertiary Care Hospital of Larkana, Sindh: A Cross Sectional Survey

Background: The increasing prevalence of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) represents a significant challenge to patient safety worldwide, particularly in tertiary care settings where the risk of transmission is heightened. Effective infection prevention and control (IPC) practices, including hand hygiene, are pivotal in mitigating these risks. Despite the critical importance of these measures, adherence varies significantly across different healthcare settings, especially in low and middle-income countries. Objective: This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported practices related to infection control among healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital in Larkana, with a specific focus on hand hygiene practices. The study seeks to identify gaps in knowledge and practice that could be targeted to improve overall IPC measures within the hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among healthcare workers at a tertiary care hospital in Larkana, utilizing a WHO-validated self-administered questionnaire. The survey covered various aspects of IPC, including hand hygiene knowledge, attitudes towards infection control, and self-reported adherence to IPC practices. The participants included doctors, nurses, paramedics, pharmacists, and technicians, with data collected on demographic details, professional roles, and specific IPC practices. Results: Out of 317 respondents, a substantial proportion, 65.93% (209 participants), reported routinely using alcohol-based hand rubs, indicating good practice adherence. Furthermore, 88.32% (280 participants) demonstrated sufficient knowledge on the correct handwashing technique as recommended by the WHO. Comparative analysis within the professional groups revealed that doctors and technicians were more likely to report higher adherence to hand hygiene practices than other healthcare workers. Conclusion: The study underscores a generally high level of knowledge and adherence to hand hygiene practices among healthcare workers in the surveyed tertiary care hospital in Larkana. Despite these positive findings, the variability in self-reported practices across different professional groups suggests the need for targeted educational and policy interventions to ensure uniform IPC compliance.

From COVID-19 Reflections: Crucial Strategies for Ensuring Healthcare Worker and Patient Safety in Developing Countries

Globally, as millions of individuals stopovered at home to curtail the spread of COVID 19, healthcare workers (HCWs) remained in field to save mankind from the deadly virus. They attended the hospitals as well as clinics, exposed themselves to risk of COVID 19. Despite multiple steps taken by global health agencies, about 704,301,493 individuals were infected and 7,006,979 died around the globe. A significant proportion of transmissions was reported from health care settings among the health care workforce and patients. About 20% of the health care workforce of Italy was infected and many died in that outbreak, along with significant ratio of disease transmission to thir families. Physical and mental health of HCWs were affected badly because of the nuisance of hard triage verdicts and expiry of patients and colleagues. The frequency of HCWs who have acquired COVID 19 was high among the endemic countries. The key causative factors for the healthcare-associated COVID 19 spreads included lack of personal protective equipment availability, improper use of PPEs, lack of training of HCWs, overcrowding in hospitals and lack of proper acquiescence to and acceptance of the significance of fulfilling infection prevention and control (IPC) strategies. This credence was reinforced by globally renowned agencies i.e., WHO and the CDC. The agencies facilitated and implemented adopting IPC measures