Infections In Lung Transplant Recipients Research Articles

Epidemiology of Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients Treated With Belatacept.

Belatacept is a costimulatory blocker that can be used to prevent and treat rejection in lung transplant recipients (LuTRs). The epidemiology of infections in belatacept-treated LuTRs has not been systematically evaluated. We performed a single-center retrospective study of all adult LuTRs who received belatacept as prevention or treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (desensitization) or as part of maintenance immunosuppression from January 1, 2011, to June 30, 2022. We assessed the epidemiology of infections that occurred within 12 months following the first belatacept dose. Fifty-two LuTRs received at least one dose of belatacept as either desensitization (n = 32) or maintenance immunosuppression (n = 20). Among 45 patients who were cytomegalovirus (CMV) donor and/or recipient seropositive, nine (20%) developed CMV infection. Seven (77%) CMV infections occurred despite valganciclovir prophylaxis and four (44%) were associated with antiviral resistance. Three (6%) LuTRs developed Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Twenty-five (48%) LuTRs developed 43 bacterial infections and five (10%) developed proven or probable invasive fungal disease. Incidence rates of viral, bacterial, and fungal infections were similar between the desensitization and maintenance groups: incidence rate ratios (95% confidence interval) were 0.70 (0.32-1.57), 1.31 (0.70-2.46), and 2.82 (0.31-25.2), respectively. Infection/PTLD prompted belatacept discontinuation in eight (15%) patients. In the first year after belatacept initiation, LuTRs commonly developed CMV infections, EBV+ PTLD, and bacterial infections. Multicenter collaborations are needed to better understand infection risks in LuTRs treated with belatacept.

A Single-center Experience With >200 Lung Transplant Recipients With COVID-19 Infection.

Although COVID-19 is no longer a declared global health emergency, data remain limited on the impact of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients. We identified lung transplant recipients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 from March 2020 through August 2022 in our institutional database and investigated clinical outcomes. We then analyzed outcomes based on date of COVID-19 diagnosis (first wave March 2020-October 2020; second wave November 2020-2021; third wave December 2021-September 2022) and compared these results. Of the 210 lung transplant recipients (median age 67; 67% men) enrolled, 140 (67%) required hospital admission. Among admitted recipients, 35 (25%) were intubated and 7 (5%) were placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Overall survival was 67.1% at 1 y and 59.0% at 2 y post-COVID-19 diagnosis. COVID-19 led to mortality in all 5 patients diagnosed during their index admission for lung transplantation. Although overall survival was significantly better in recipients with COVID-19 during the third wave, in-hospital mortality remained high (first wave 28%, second wave 38%, and 28% third wave). Vaccination (partially vaccinated versus none and fully vaccinated versus none) was the only significant protective factor for hospital admission, and age 70 y and older and partially vaccinated (versus none or fully vaccinated) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Overall survival after COVID-19 infection in lung transplant recipients continues to improve; however, in-hospital mortality remains remarkably high. Vaccination appears to have been impactful in preventing hospital admission, but its impact on in-hospital mortality is still unclear. Further research is needed to better identify lung transplant recipients at high risk for mortality from COVID-19.

Description, clinical impact and early outcome of S. maltophilia respiratory tract infections after lung transplantation, A retrospective observational study

Background and research questionS. maltophilia infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Little is known regarding its presentation, management, and outcome in lung transplant recipients. Study design and MethodsThis retrospective case control study reviewed S. maltophilia respiratory tract infection in lung transplant recipients (01/01/2011-31/01/2020) and described the clinical, microbiological and outcome characteristics matched with lung transplant recipients without respiratory tract infection. Results and interpretationWe identified 63 S. maltophilia infections in lung transplant recipients. Among them none were colonized before transplantation. Infections occurred a median of 177 (IQR: 45- 681) days post transplantation. Fifty-four (85.7 %) patients received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (400/80 mg three times a week) to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP). S. maltophilia strains were susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, levofloxacin, minocycline and ceftazidime in respectively 85.7 %, 82.5 %, 96.8 % and 34.9 % of cases. Median duration of treatment was 9 days (IQR 7–11.5). Clinical and microbiological recurrence were observed in respectively 25.3 % and 39.7 % of cases. Combination therapy was not associated with a decrease in the risk of recurrence and did not prevent the emergence of resistance. S. maltophilia respiratory tract infection was associated with a decline in FEV-1 at one year. ConclusionS. maltophilia is an important cause of lower respiratory tract infection in lung transplant recipients. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use as prophylaxis for PJP doesn't prevent S. maltophilia infection among lung transplant recipients. Levofloxacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole appear to be the two molecules of choice for the treatment of these infections and new antibiotic strategies (cefiderocol, aztreonam/avibactam) are currently being evaluated for multi-resistant S. maltophilia infections.

High Mortality Rates Associated with Parainfluenza Virus, not Metapneumovirus, Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Observation

High Mortality Rates Associated with Parainfluenza Virus, not Metapneumovirus, Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Observation

Impact of Intravenous Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy on Hypogammaglobulinemia and Infection in Lung Transplant Recipients

Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) from immunosuppression therapy in lung transplant recipients has been associated with increased mortality, morbidity and higher risk of infection. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for the treatment of HGG post-lung transplant is not well studied with conflicting evidence regarding efficacy. This single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzed adult lung transplant recipients with HGG receiving ≥1 dose of IVIG 0.3-0.5 g/kg. Resolution of HGG (IgG > 600 mg/dL within 30 days of IVIG) was evaluated for optimal dose and duration of IVIG therapy. Incidence of infection, patient survival, rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival at 1 year were compared between resolved and persistent HGG. Results demonstrated majority of patients 46/58 (79.3%) achieved HGG resolution. Severe HGG (IgG < 400 mg/dL) was significantly associated with persistent HGG (50.5% vs 15.2%, p = 0.02), with comparable cumulative IVIG dose and duration between both groups (p = 0.96 and p = 0.39, respectively). No other variables correlated with HGG resolution. Overall infection rates were similar between groups (69.6% vs 58.3%, p = 0.50), suggesting HGG resolution did not correlate with incidence of infection. Lastly, use of IVIG for the treatment of HGG appears to be safe with minimal incidence of thrombosis found within each group.

Donor-derived Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma infections in lung transplant recipients: A prospective study of donor and recipient respiratory tract screening and recipient outcomes

Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma species are urogenital mollicutes that can cause serious donor-derived infections in lung transplant recipients. Best practices for mollicute screening remain unknown. We conducted a single-center prospective study analyzing lung transplants performed from October 5, 2020, to September 25, 2021, whereby donor and recipient bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples obtained at time of transplant underwent mollicute screening via culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Of 115 total lung transplants performed, 99 (86%) donors underwent combined mollicute BAL culture and PCR testing. The study cohort included these 99 donors and their matched recipients. In total, 18 (18%) of 99 donors screened positive via culture or PCR. Among recipients, 92 (93%) of 99 had perioperative BAL screening performed, and only 3 (3%) had positive results. After transplant, 9 (9%) recipients developed mollicute infection. Sensitivity of donor screening in predicting recipient mollicute infection was 67% (6/9) via culture and 56% (5/9) via PCR. Positive predictive value for donor culture was 75% (6/8), compared with 33% (5/15) for PCR. Donor screening via culture predicted all serious recipient mollicute infections and had better positive predictive value than PCR; however, neither screening test predicted all mollicute infections. Independent of screening results, clinicians should remain suspicious for posttransplant mollicute infection.

Donor-derived mold infections in lung transplant recipients: The importance of active surveillance.

Unexpected donor-derived fungal infections represent a rare but potentially fatal complication in lung transplant (Tx) recipients. Timely communication of the results of donor cultures and prompt treatment of recipients are crucial to mitigate the consequences of donor-derived transmissions. In this prospective cohort study, all consecutive patients who underwent lung transplantation from 2015 to 2022 were included. In December 2015, a Local Active Surveillance System has been implemented to provide biovigilance of donor culture results and optimize recipients' management. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence of unexpected, mold-positive cultures among lung donors and the rate of transmission to recipients. Furthermore, management strategies and outcome of recipients with mold transmission are described. In case of isolation of the same mold in donor and recipient cultures, when possible, transmission was confirmed by dendrogram analysis. During the study period, 82 lung Tx were performed from 80 donors. The prevalence of donors with "unexpected" mold isolation from the respiratory tract was 3.75% (3/80). Isolated molds were Aspergillus niger, Rhizopus oryzae, and Aspergillus flavus. Transmissions occurred in all the three cases (100%) with a mean time of 5 days from lung Tx but none of the recipients developed invasive mold disease. Our Local Active Surveillance System allowed prompt recognition of lung donors unexpected mold colonization. Even though transmission occurred, introduction of early targeted antifungal therapy prevented potential catastrophic consequence of mold donor-derived infection in the immediate post-Tx period.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in lung transplant recipients.

This study aimed to investigate the clinical manifestations and prognosis of lung transplant (LTx) recipients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. The research participants were LTx recipients who underwent surgery and were regularly followed up at our center. From 1 December 2022 to 28 February 2023, during the COVID-19 pandemic in China, research participants were interviewed either online or in person. SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid or self-tested antigens were detected according to accessibility. Diagnosis and treatment were performed according to the Diagnosis and Treatment Plan for COVID-19 (10th edition) issued by the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. Hospitalized patients underwent chest imaging examinations, routine blood tests, biomarkers for infection and inflammation, and biochemical tests, all of which were taken and recorded. Data were analyzed to describe the features of COVID-19 in LTx recipients. In total, 52 patients were enrolled in this study, comprising 48 men and 4 women, with a mean age of 51.71 ± 11.67 years. By 1 December 2022, the mean survival period was 33.87 ± 25.97 months, of which 84.61% of the patients (44/52) had a survival period longer than 12 months. The SARS-CoV-2 infection rate in these LTx recipients was 82.69% (43/52), with 3.85% (2/52) of the infected recipients being asymptomatic, 50.00% (26/52) of the infected recipients experiencing mild COVID-19, 11.54% (6/52) having moderate COVID-19, and 17.31% (9/52) having severe or critical COVID-19. The mortality rate among severe and critical patients was 66.67% (6/9). LTx recipients in this cohort exhibited a notable susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2, with 82.69% of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19. Moreover, the mortality rate among critically ill patients was high.

Low Mortality Associated with COVID-19 Infection in Lung Transplant Recipients at a Single Center

Lung Transplant Recipients (LTR) are particularly vulnerable to severe infection, hospitalization, and death due to community acquired respiratory viruses. As a result, the global SARS-Cov-2 pandemic poses a higher risk to this population. We aim to study the lung function, severity of infection and mortality among LTR at a single center. A retrospective chart review was performed on all LTR at the University of San Diego, California Medical Center between June 2020 and September 2022. Spirometry was performed at 1-2 months and then again 3 months after infection. Patients were closely monitored for the development of acute cellular rejection (ACR). 72 LTR were infected with COVID-19. 37.5% required hospital admission, of which 25.9% required management in the intensive care unit (ICU). 73.6% LTR had received at least one vaccination dose prior to infection. Post-infection, the median drop in FEV1 was 140 mL and FVC was 25 mL within 1-2 months. At 3 months post-infection the median reduction in FVC was slightly larger at 75 ml, while median decline in FEV1 decreased to 55 ml. Overall, the rates of ACR and mortality in this population were both 4.2%. Additionally, monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy reduced hospitalization (20.9% vs 62%) and mortality (0% vs 10.3%), Our study found low rates of ACR and mortality in LTR with confirmed COVID-19, despite the statistically significant decline in FEV1, and trends with FVC. The use of vaccinations and mAb therapy decreased rates of hospitalizations, with mAb therapy reducing mortality as well.

(1427) - Association of Donor Derived Cell-Free DNA Fractions with Acute Rejection and Pulmonary Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients

(1427) - Association of Donor Derived Cell-Free DNA Fractions with Acute Rejection and Pulmonary Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients

(134) - The Ability of an Electronic Nose to Distinguish Between Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients

(134) - The Ability of an Electronic Nose to Distinguish Between Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients

A case report of drug interaction between co-packaged nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and tacrolimus causing hyponatremia in a lung transplant recipient

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in lung transplant recipients can be lethal owing to the use of immunosuppressants. Antiviral agents may be administered to these patients. Co-packaged nirmatrelvir-ritonavir is a new agent currently being used in combination.Case presentationIn this report, we present a case of a 64-year-old woman, a lung transplant recipient, who experienced hyponatremia and showed a high serum tacrolimus concentration following the administration of the co-packaged nirmatrelvir-ritonavir combination.ConclusionAlthough the nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and tacrolimus combination is not contraindicated, other treatment strategies should be considered first, if available, and the dose of tacrolimus should be reduced when using the nirmatrelvir-ritonavir combination. In cases where combination therapy is necessary, serum tacrolimus levels should be closely monitored in lung transplant recipients. Documentation of more such reports is important to identify drug interactions between nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and other agents, with the aim of preventing severe adverse effects.

Alterations of lung microbiota in lung transplant recipients with pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia

BackgroundIncreasing evidence revealed that lung microbiota dysbiosis was associated with pulmonary infection in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Pneumocystis jirovecii (P. jirovecii) is an opportunistic fungal pathogen that frequently causes lethal pneumonia in LTRs. However, the lung microbiota in LTRs with P. jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) remains unknow.MethodsIn this prospective observational study, we performed metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) on 72 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples from 61 LTRs (20 with PJP, 22 with PJC, 19 time-matched stable LTRs, and 11 from LTRs after PJP recovery). We compared the lung microbiota composition of LTRs with and without P. jirovecii, and analyzed the related clinical variables.ResultsBALFs collected at the episode of PJP showed a more discrete distribution with a lower species diversity, and microbiota composition differed significantly compared to P. jirovecii colonization (PJC) and control group. Human gammaherpesvirus 4, Phreatobacter oligotrophus, and Pseudomonas balearica were the differential microbiota species between the PJP and the other two groups. The network analysis revealed that most species had a positive correlation, while P. jirovecii was correlated negatively with 10 species including Acinetobacter venetianus, Pseudomonas guariconensis, Paracandidimonas soli, Acinetobacter colistiniresistens, and Castellaniella defragrans, which were enriched in the control group. The microbiota composition and diversity of BALF after PJP recovery were also different from the PJP and control groups, while the main components of the PJP recovery similar to control group. Clinical variables including age, creatinine, total protein, albumin, IgG, neutrophil, lymphocyte, CD3+CD45+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells were deeply implicated in the alterations of lung microbiota in LTRs.ConclusionsThis study suggests that LTRs with PJP had altered lung microbiota compared to PJC, control, and after recovery groups. Furthermore, lung microbiota is related to age, renal function, nutritional and immune status in LTRs.

The changing landscape of infections in the lung transplant recipient.

Infections in lung transplant recipients remain a major challenge and can affect lung allograft function and cause significant morbidity and mortality. New strategies for the prevention and treatment of infection in lung transplantation have emerged and are reviewed. For important vaccine preventable infections (VPIs), guidance has been updated for at risk solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, data on the efficacy of newer vaccines in lung transplant, including the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine, are limited. Studies demonstrate improved vaccination rate with Infectious Diseases consultation during pretransplant evaluation. Two new antiviral agents for the treatment and prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in SOT, letermovir and maribavir, are being incorporated into clinical care. CMV-specific cell-mediated immune function assays are more widely available. Antibiotics for the management of multidrug resistant pathogens and Burkholderia cepacia complex have been described in case series and case reports in lung transplant. Although new vaccines and novel therapies for preventing and treating infections are available, larger studies evaluating efficacy in lung transplant recipients are needed.

Risk Factors for Invasive Fungal Infection in Lung Transplant Recipients on Universal Antifungal Prophylaxis.

Many centers use universal antifungal prophylaxis after lung transplant, but risk factors for invasive fungal infection (IFI) in this setting are poorly described. This retrospective, single-center cohort study including 603 lung transplant recipients assessed risk factors for early (within 90 days of transplant) invasive candidiasis (IC) and invasive mold infection (IMI) and late (90-365 days after transplant) IMI using Cox proportional hazard regression. In this cohort, 159 (26.4%) patients had 182 IFIs. Growth of yeast on donor culture (hazard ratio [HR], 3.30; 95% CI, 1.89-5.75) and prolonged length of stay (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03) were associated with early IC risk, whereas transplantation in 2016 or 2017 (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.70; HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.80, respectively) and female recipient sex (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.93) were associated with reduced risk. Antimold therapy (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.78) was associated with lower early IMI risk, and female donor sex (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22-0.72) was associated with lower late IMI risk. Recent rejection was a risk factor for late IMI (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.02-2.95), and renal replacement therapy predisposed to early IC, early IMI, and late IMI (HR, 5.67; 95% CI, 3.01-10.67; HR, 7.54; 95% CI, 1.93-29.45; HR, 5.33; 95% CI, 1.46-19.49, respectively). In lung transplant recipients receiving universal antifungal prophylaxis, risk factors for early IC, early IMI, and late IMI differ.

Prevention and Management of Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients.

Anti-rejection medications are essential in preventing organ rejection amongst solid organ transplant recipients; however, these agents also cause profound immunosuppression, predisposing lung transplant recipients (LTRs) to infectious complications. The timely management including prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of such infectious complications is vital to prevent significant morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients and allograft dysfunction. LTRs are inundated with microbes that may be recognized as commensals in hosts with intact immune systems. Bacterial infections are the most common ones, followed by viral pathogens. Indications of a brewing infectious process may be subtle. Hence, the importance of adapting vigilance around isolated hints through symptomatology and signs is pivotal. Signals to suggest an infectious process, such as fever and leukocytosis, may be dampened by immunosuppressive agents. One must also be vigilant about drug interactions of antibiotics and immunosuppressive agents. Treatment of infections can become challenging, as antimicrobials can interact with immunosuppressive agents, and antimicrobial resistance can surge under antimicrobial pressure. Transplant infectious disease physicians work in concert with transplant teams to obtain specimens for diagnostic testing and follow through with source control when possible. This heavily impacts medical decisions and fosters a multidisciplinary approach in management. Furthermore, the reduction of immunosuppression, although it augments the risk of allograft rejection, is as crucial as the initiation of appropriate antimicrobials when it comes to the management of infections.

Immediate Postoperative COVID-19 Infection after Lung Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Case Series.

With new variants challenging the effectiveness of preventive measures, we are beginning to recognize the reality that COVID-19 will continue to pose an endemic threat. The manifestations of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients during index admission are poorly understood with very few cases reported in recent lung transplant recipients. Optimal management of immunosuppression and antiviral therapy in recent transplant recipients is challenging. We performed a retrospective analysis identifying lung transplant recipients at our institution who contracted COVID-19 in the immediate postoperative period (within index admission). In addition, we performed a systematic review from January 2020 to August 2023 identifying all publications on the PUBMED database regarding COVID-19 infection in lung transplant recipients during index admission. We report four cases of COVID-19 pneumonia in lung transplant recipients in the immediate postoperative period and we describe the clinical course, treatment options, and immunosuppression changes to manage this unique clinical problem. All patients made a full recovery and were eventually discharged home. Within our review of the literature, the most prevalent presenting symptoms were cough, dyspnea, and fatigue. Six (75%) patients decreased or held their antimetabolite. The two most common treatments were monoclonal antibodies (38%) and remdesivir (63%). Although previous literature demonstrates that COVID-19 can be deadly in recent lung transplant recipients, rapid treatment with anti-viral therapy/immunotherapy, deescalating immunosuppression, and treatment of respiratory decompensation with Decadron was effective in our patients.

Differentiation between lung allograft rejection and infection using donor-derived cell-free DNA and pathogen detection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing

BackgroundIn lung transplant recipients (LTRs), the primary causes of mortality are rejection and infection, which often present similar symptoms, making differentiation challenging. This study aimed to explore the diagnostic efficacy of plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in conjunction with metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for pathogen detection in differentiation between lung allograft rejection and infection in LTRs experiencing new-onset pulmonary complications. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study on 188 LTRs who underwent lung or heart-lung transplantation at our institution from 2015 to 2021. The LTRs were categorized into three groups: stable, rejection, and infection. We measured plasma dd-cfDNA levels and utilized both mNGS and culture methods to identify pathogens in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). ResultsThe rejection group exhibited the highest levels of plasma dd-cfDNA (median 1.34 %, interquartile range [IQR] 1.06–2.19 %) compared to the infection group (median 0.72 %, IQR 0.62–1.07 %) and the stable group (median 0.69 %, IQR 0.58–0.78 %) (both p < 0.001). Within the infection group, a significantly higher level of dd-cfDNA was observed in the cytomegalovirus infection subgroup (p < 0.001), but not in the fungal (p > 0.05) or bacterial infection subgroups (p > 0.05), when compared to the stable group. Elevated dd-cfDNA levels, in combination with negative mNGS results, strongly indicated lung allograft rejection, with a positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 88.7 % and 99.2 %, respectively. ConclusionsPlasma dd-cfDNA in combination with BALF pathogen detection by mNGS shows satisfactory accuracy in differentiating lung allograft rejection from infectious complications.

Incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in lung transplant recipients in the Omicron era

Incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in lung transplant recipients in the Omicron era

Lung Transplant Recipients and COVID-19: Report of Two Cases.

Although the WHO has declared the end of the pandemic emergency, COVID-19 still poses a threat to immunocompromised patients. The COVID-19 pandemic has spread throughout the world over the last two years, causing a significant number of deaths. After three years, SARS-CoV-2 has lost its initial lethality but has shown a significantly worse prognosis for immunocompromised patients, especially those who have undergone lung transplantation, compared with the general population. This paper presents two compelling case studies that highlight the complex challenges of COVID-19 infection in lung transplant recipients. The first case involves a patient who received a bilateral lung transplant for pulmonary artery hypertension in 2009, followed by a kidney transplant in 2022. Surprisingly, despite an initially favorable clinical course after contracting COVID-19, the patient deteriorated rapidly and died within a few days due to extensive lung involvement. This case highlights the unpredictable nature of COVID-19 and its potentially devastating impact on lung transplant recipients. The second case involves a patient who underwent bilateral lung transplantation five years earlier for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This individual also contracted COVID-19 and had pre-existing complications, including chronic lung allograft rejection (CLAD) and diffuse bronchial stenosis. Following viral infection, the patient's clinical condition deteriorated rapidly, with worsening bronchial stenosis. This case highlights the ability of COVID-19 to exacerbate pre-existing pulmonary complications in transplant recipients. These cases highlight the urgent need for increased vigilance and tailored management strategies when dealing with COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients. The unpredictable and detrimental course of the disease observed in these patients highlights the importance of implementing stringent preventive measures, such as vaccination and strict adherence to infection control protocols, in this vulnerable population. Further research is essential to gain a full understanding of the unique dynamics of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients and to develop targeted interventions to improve their outcomes.