Worldwide, infections with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have become a major cause of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the major global problems for public health in the world and Iran (1–3). HBV infection is the main cause of chronic liver disease in Iran (4) and the seroprevalence of HBV infection in Iran has been decreased during the last two decades (5). The main risk factor for HBV transmission was related to maternal-to-infantile transmission and the infantile vaccination with high coverage is the main cause for changes in epidemiology of HBV infection. But today, we have more risk factors for transmission in adulthood. The community contacts more in adolescence and the health policy makers should attend more for control of HBV infection. People awareness, risk factors modifications, harm reduction programmes in young addicted persons, vaccination against HBV in adults should be consider for control of HBV infection in future. We have less new cases, but we will have more cirrhotic cases and we need to consider the best therapy for prevention of HBV infection to end-stage phases. Therapy of HBV infection in which phase and which drugs are the debate. The goal of therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients is sustained suppression of HBV viremia and decrease progression of liver disease to cirrhosis and HCC with the ultimate goal of improving survival. This can be pursued by maintaining constant inhibition of viral replication through a long term treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs or by inducing, through the combined antiviral and immunomodulatory effects of interferon, a sustained immune response (6). Standard interferon is the oldest approved drug in therapy of HBV infection, but it has a limited response rate. Recently new published data have shown the better response with pegylated interferon in therapy of chronic HBV infection (7, 8). PEG-IFNα-2a has been licensed for the treatment of both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic HBV as a 48-week course, given by subcutaneous injection once weekly in a dosage of 180 mg. The main side effects of therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogs such as lamivudine, adefovir and entecavir, is emergence of resistance (9, 10). These events will decrease benefit of therapy with anti-viral agents. HBs Ag level in prediction of therapy response The main question was and is regarding how and when we can conclude the therapy in HBV infection is effective and we should continue or it is ineffective and we should discontinue it. During recent years serum HBsAg is hypothesized to be a marker for immunological response to therapy, independent of virological response as measured using HBV DNA levels, because of its correlation with intrahepatic HBV covalently closed circular (ccc) DNA, the main replicative template of HBV (11). HBsAg levels appear to differentiate patients in the inactive carrier state from those with active disease or from inactive carriers with a high probability of subsequent relapse. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that on- treatment HBsAg levels are predictive of a durable off-treatment response to peginterferon (PEG-IFN), and can accurately identify non-responders early during therapy, both in HBeAg-positive, and HBeAg-negative patients. Among those who underwent HBsAg loss within 6 years of follow-up, serum HBsAg levels were a better predictor than HBV DNA levels. Low serum levels of HBsAg, alone or in combination with HBV DNA levels, 1 year after HBeAg seroconversion can predict HBsAg loss in patients with HBV infection (12). Currently, multiple diagnostic assays are available for quantification of HBsAg. That we should use the validate method for diagnosis.