Inequalities In Health Care Provision Research Articles

Factors affecting patient and public perceptions of the adoption of electronic health record sharing: A Hong Kong study

Background and ObjectivesThe disclosure of personal health information in electronic health records (eHR) highlights privacy and security concerns that are complicated by the digitization and interoperability of health records. Hong Kong’s Electronic Health Record Sharing System (eHRSS), introduced in March 2016, enables eHR sharing among public and private health services upon the consent of patients. Based on a September 2021 survey, this study examined the specific context of Hong Kong, patient and public perceptions on the security and privacy of eHR sharing, correlation of trust with personal privacy and security concerns, and how perceptions affect health care-related decisions. MethodsUsing a random sample of householders aged 45–70 years, the study conducted a questionnaire survey on respondents’ awareness, perceived benefits, and obstacles to participating in the eHRSS, and the impact of their perceptions on health care-related decisions. A focus group discussion with 13 participants further explored views on the security of Hong Kong’s eHRSS and their readiness to support the system. ResultsThe study analyzed data from 400 responses. The findings showed a low degree of awareness of the eHRSS. Privacy and security concerns were impeding factors in the sharing of information; half of the respondents reported being concerned over their personal health information being part of the eHRSS. The majority (86.9%) expressed conditional support for the sharing of information. Despite their concerns on security and privacy, 66.5% and 77.9%, respectively, would not withhold information nor postpone the seeking of medical care based on those concerns. Participants in the focus group expressed concerns regarding eHRSS registration, data leaks, information accuracy, and the potential prejudice that may result in discrimination and inequality in health care provision. ConclusionsSatisfaction with the health care services played a role in the trust reposed in the Hospital Authority and health care providers and institutions. Security and privacy were decisive factors in respodents’ refusal to seek care from physicians who had violated their privacy. Respondents expressed greater interest in sharing their information if measures were in place for anonymization and punishing data misuse. Ensuring rights of control toward information sharing would inspire greater confidence among patients.

Socioeconomic deprivation: an important largely unrecognized risk factor in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Abstract Background Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Whether deprivation status should be incorporated in more cardiovascular risk estimation scores remains unclear. Purpose This study evaluates how socioeconomic deprivation status affects the performance of three primary prevention cardiovascular risk scores. Methods The Generation Scotland Scottish Family Health Study was used to evaluate the performance of three cardiovascular risk scores with (ASSIGN) and without (SCORE2, PCE) socioeconomic deprivation as a covariate in the risk prediction model. Deprivation was defined by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation score. The predicted 10-year risk was evaluated against the observed event rate for the cardiovascular outcome of each risk score. The comparison was made across three groups defined by the deprivation index score consisting of group 1 defined as most deprived, group 3 defined as least deprived and group 2 which consisted of individuals in the middle deprivation categories. Results The study population consisted of 15,506 individuals (60.0% female, median age of 51). Across the population 1,808 (12%) individuals were assigned to group 1 (most deprived), 8,119 (55%) to group 2, and 4,708 (32%) to group 3 (least deprived). Risk scores based on models that did not include deprivation status significantly under predicted risk in the most deprived (6.4% observed versus 4.6% predicted for SCORE2 and 6.7% observed versus 4.7% predicted for PCE, p<0.001 for both). Both risk scores also significantly overpredicted the risk in the least deprived group (4.0% observed versus 4.7% predicted for SCORE2, p=0.007 and 4.2% observed versus 4.9% predicted for PCE, p=0.028). In contrast, no significant difference was demonstrated in the observed versus predicted risk when using the ASSIGN risk score, which included socioeconomic deprivation status in the risk model. Conclusions Socioeconomic status is a largely unrecognized risk factor in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Risk scores that exclude socioeconomic deprivation as a covariate under- and overestimate the risk in the most and least deprived individuals, respectively. This study highlights the importance of incorporating socioeconomic deprivation status in risk estimation systems to ultimately reduce inequalities in health care provision for cardiovascular disease. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The British Heart Foundation.Health Data Research UK which receives its funding from HDR UK Ltd (HDR-5012) funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department of Health and Social Care (England), Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), British Heart Foundation and the Wellcome Trust.

Socioeconomic Deprivation: An Important, Largely Unrecognized Risk Factor in Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.

Background:Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Whether deprivation status should be incorporated in more cardiovascular risk estimation scores remains unclear. This study evaluates how socioeconomic deprivation status affects the performance of 3 primary prevention cardiovascular risk scores.Methods:The Generation Scotland Scottish Family Health Study was used to evaluate the performance of 3 cardiovascular risk scores with (ASSIGN [Assessing cardiovascular risk using SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) guidelines to ASSIGN preventive treatment]) and without (SCORE2 [Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 algorithm], Pooled Cohort Equations) socioeconomic deprivation as a covariate in the risk prediction model. Deprivation was defined by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation score. The predicted 10-year risk was evaluated against the observed event rate for the cardiovascular outcome of each risk score. The comparison was made across 3 groups defined by the deprivation index score consisting of group 1 defined as most deprived, group 3 defined as least deprived, and group 2, which consisted of individuals in the middle deprivation categories.Results:The study population consisted of 15 506 individuals (60.0% female, median age of 51). Across the population, 1808 (12%) individuals were assigned to group 1 (most deprived), 8119 (52%) to group 2, and 4708 (30%) to group 3 (least deprived), and 871 (6%) individuals had a missing deprivation score. Risk scores based on models that did not include deprivation status significantly under predicted risk in the most deprived (6.43% observed versus 4.63% predicted for SCORE2 [P=0.001] and 6.69% observed versus 4.66% predicted for Pooled Cohort Equations [P<0.001]). Both risk scores also significantly overpredicted the risk in the least deprived group (3.97% observed versus 4.72% predicted for SCORE2 [P=0.007] and 4.22% observed versus 4.85% predicted for Pooled Cohort Equations [P=0.028]). In contrast, no significant difference was demonstrated in the observed versus predicted risk when using the ASSIGN risk score, which included socioeconomic deprivation status in the risk model.Conclusions:Socioeconomic status is a largely unrecognized risk factor in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Risk scores that exclude socioeconomic deprivation as a covariate under- and overestimate the risk in the most and least deprived individuals, respectively. This study highlights the importance of incorporating socioeconomic deprivation status in risk estimation systems to ultimately reduce inequalities in health care provision for cardiovascular disease.

Factors that hinder medical career aspirations: A nationwide questionnaire survey of teachers in charge of career guidance in Japanese high schools

Despite concerns raised on the inequality in healthcare provision in Japan, little is known about the factors that hinder candidates’ application to medical schools. A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted to identify the impact of economic factors and living place on students’ choice of and preparation for medical school. The survey was administered to high school teachers with career advisory roles, as they support and likely influence students’ choice and decision on this matter. Responses totaling 1,094 were obtained from 1,746 high schools across Japan. The ratio of high schools with two or more students enrolled in medical schools every year is higher in private schools, those with high tuition, and those located in big cities. Approximately 66.8% of the respondents agreed that "It is difficult for students in economically disadvantaged families to enroll in medical schools;" 42.0% agreed that "Some students gave up on aspiring to enter medical schools because they could not afford it," and 61.2% agreed that "Students living in urban areas are more likely to enroll in medical schools." When asked about the percentage of students attending prep school among those aspiring for a medical career, significantly more respondents from private versus public high schools answered "80% or more." When asked about the percentage of parents who are doctors or dentists among students aspiring for a medical career, significantly more respondents from private versus public high schools answered "50% or more.” The results suggest that students from lower-income families and those living in rural areas are more likely to be disadvantaged when choosing a medical career (because of financial difficulties) than those who live in urban areas and come from wealthier families. The results imply that economic and geographical divides in medical admission are reflected in high school teachers’ perception of and support provided to students.

Demographic factors associated with length of stay in hospital and histological diagnosis in adults undergoing appendicectomy

Appendicectomy remains of the most common emergency operations in the United Kingdom. The exact etiologies of appendicitis remain unclear with only potential causes suggested in the literature. Social deprivation and ethnicity have both been demonstrated to influence outcomes following many operations. There are currently no studies evaluating their roles with regards to severity and outcomes following appendicectomy. Demographic data were retrieved from health records for adult patients who underwent appendicectomy between 2010-2016 within a single NHS trust. To measure social deprivation, Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) rankings were used. Histology reports were reviewed and diagnosis classified into predefined categories: non-inflamed appendix, uncomplicated appendicitis, complicated appendicitis and gangrenous appendicitis. Three thousand four hundred and forty-four patients were identified. Mean age was 37.8 years (range 73 years). Using a generalized linear model, South Asian ethnicity specifically was found to be independently predictive of increased length of stay following appendicectomy (p <0.001). Amongst South Asian patients, social deprivation was found to be further predictive of longer hospital stay (p= 0.005). Deprivation was found to be a predictor of complicated appendicitis but not of gangrenous appendicitis (p= 0.01). Male gender and age were also independent predictors of positive histology for appendicitis (p <0.001 and p= 0.021 respectively). This study is the first to report an independent association between South Asian ethnicity and increased length of stay for patients undergoing appendicectomy in a single NHS trust. The associations reported in this study may be a result of differences in the pathophysiology of acute appendicitis or represent inequalities in healthcare provision across ethnic and socioeconomic groups.

The Lived Experience of Inequalities in the Provision of Treatment for Hepatitis C.

The issues of health, illness, stigma and inequalities in healthcare provision, areas that in my role as a social researcher were already of interest and concern, shifted to a different perspective when I was diagnosed with hepatitis C. From this altered position, my body and lifeworld were a nexus point for a range of ongoing challenges around staying as well as possible, and the struggle to get my healthcare needs met. There is a gap between the support provided for some ill and disabled people, and the help that they actually require. This is particularly so for conditions that are not well understood, that have a low public profile, limited funding, and/or are in some way stigmatised due to perceived differences to social norms. Hepatitis C is one such condition, it is a viral disease that is transmitted through blood-to-blood contact and it causes ongoing damage to the liver. Because of the systemic nature of the disease, individuals may struggle to cope with the demands of work and daily living, and their lifeworld and opportunities are frequently limited. It can be challenging for the patient to advocate for themselves due to low energy levels, self-blame for getting ill, and the stigma associated with the condition. The first generation of effective anti-viral drugs emerged from clinical trials in 2013, but in the United Kingdom context, access was only possible for those with advanced liver disease. Therefore, many patients felt compelled to purchase the anti-virals through Buyers Clubs, whereby generic versions of the drugs are imported for personal use at a fraction of the market cost. In this article I draw on my own lived experience of joining a Buyers Club as an example of how risks and benefits are weighed, and to explain the contexts in which decisions are shaped and made.

Dynamics surrounding the Implementation of the Primary Health Care Approach in Zimbabwe’s Rural Areas: The Case of Mt Darwin District

This research studied the implementation of the Primary Health Care approach to health service delivery in Zimbabwe’s rural areas from 2009 to 2012. The approach was launched in response to the Alma-Alta Declaration in 1978 which sought to end the inequalities in health care provision around the globe and was first adopted and implemented in 1982 in Zimbabwe. The approach almost collapsed due to the economic meltdown in the past decade but the period 2009 to 2013 marked a new economic paradigm in Zimbabwe which saw the economy being dollarized which subsequently led to the revival and the resuscitation of the health sector. It is therefore to explore the progress and the dynamics surrounding the implementation of the PHC at Mt Darwin Hospital in light of the dollarized economy. The study explores the dynamics surrounding the implementation of PHC at Mt Darwin District Hospital by particular attention to the following key elements: promotion of nutrition, sanitation, maternal and child care, immunization, treatment of common diseases and provision of essential drugs. Qualitative techniques such as face to face interviews with key informants and documentary research were used to generate data. The research findings revealed that PHC is a powerful tool in delivering health services in Mt Darwin. However, lack of material, financial and human resources have hindered the proper implementation of the PHC approach in Mt Darwin district. The study recommends multi sectoral collaboration in solving health related issues.

Improving antenatal engagement for Aboriginal women in Australia: A scoping review

BackgroundAboriginal women have an increased risk of poor antenatal engagement in pregnancy in comparison with Caucasian women, due to inequalities in health care provision. The Pregnancy Outcome in South Australia reports Aboriginal women having 10 times the risk of non-attendance of antenatal care throughout their pregnancy, 3 times the risk of attending the initial booking appointment later than recommended in their pregnancy, and Aboriginal women have an increased risk of attending significantly less antenatal appointments than Caucasian women. ObjectiveThe primary purpose of the scoping review is to map the body of literature known about Aboriginal women engaging with antenatal care in Australia, and the factors that facilitate or cause barriers to this engagement. Secondary to this, the review will describe how culturally safe care influences antenatal engagement. MethodsScoping reviews utilise a broad range of literature, encompassing all types of studies. An online search of 6 databases was conducted to identify and critically analyse sources discussing antenatal engagement for Aboriginal women in Australia. Using the JBI framework for Scoping Reviews, the researcher was able to strengthen the rigour of the methodology. FindingsThe search produced 9 articles, relating to 6 studies addressing antenatal engagement for Aboriginal women in Australia. Several themes were prevalent in the research that impact antenatal engagement including: Smoking, Relocation, Continuity of Care, Aboriginal maternity infant care workers, home visits, birthing on country, age, family and culturally safe care. ConclusionAboriginal women have identified continuity of care, Aboriginal workforce, home visits, family involvement, birthing on country and cultural safety as factors that improve antenatal engagement. Aboriginal women have reported smoking, rural and remote location, cultural incompetence and young age as factors that deter them from engaging with antenatal care.In order to improve antenatal engagement for Aboriginal women in South Australia, culturally safe care is essential. In order to determine the factors that facilitate and/or deter Aboriginal women from antenatal engagement, further research is required.

Exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and UK lockdown on individuals with experience of eating disorders

BackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may raise unique challenges for individuals with experience of eating disorders. Many factors have potential for detrimental impacts on psychological wellbeing and eating disorder recovery, including: Disruption to living situations, ‘social distancing’ restrictions, difficult access to healthcare, and societal changes to food behaviours and technology usage. To date, little is known on the impact of the pandemic on this population, particularly within the UK.MethodA mixed-methods online survey was developed for the purpose of this study. Data was collected from 129 individuals currently experiencing, or in recovery from, an eating disorder during the early stages of the UK pandemic lockdown. Participants were aged between 16 and 65 years, with 121 participants identifying as female, 7 male and 1 participant preferring not to disclose their gender.ResultsFindings suggest that the pandemic is having a profound, negative impact upon individuals with experience of eating disorders. Eight key themes were generated: Disruption to living situation, increased social isolation and reduced access to usual support networks, changes to physical activity rates, reduced access to healthcare services, disruption to routine and perceived control, changes to relationship with food, increased exposure to triggering messages, and positive outcomes. The results suggest detrimental impacts on psychological wellbeing including decreased feelings of control, increased feelings of social isolation, increased rumination about disordered eating, and low feelings of social support.ConclusionsIndividuals with eating disorders are at significant risk of negative impacts of the pandemic. There is a vital need for interventions to support this population. Inequalities in healthcare provision were identified, emphasising a need for a more cohesive approach to remote treatment across UK healthcare services. Positive aspects of technology use were identified but the results suggest a need to address and/or limit the potential for negative impacts of public messages around food and exercise behaviours, and to co-design technologies with end-users to facilitate effective treatment.

REPORT-HF reveals global inequalities in health care provision and prognosis of patients with acute heart failure.

REPORT-HF reveals global inequalities in health care provision and prognosis of patients with acute heart failure.

Inequalities in Healthcare Provision to Third Country Nationals in Cyprus and the Prospect of a Promising Health Reform

The rise of migratory inflows in post-crisis Cyprus raised crucial policy challenges, one of which was about the urgent and pressing problem of their access to healthcare services. The old system was characterised by health inequalities that resulted in high unmet needs, especially among migrants from third countries. Drawing on a document analysis of legislative acts, official reports and research papers regarding national health policy, as well as pilot findings from the field, the main aim of this paper is to shed light on this situation and explore under what conditions the ongoing healthcare reform could address the problem of coverage and access to healthcare services for this vulnerable group.

The reporting of race and/or ethnicity in the medical literature: a retrospective bibliometric analysis confirmed room for improvement

ObjectivesAlthough the collection of race and/or ethnicity data is an important way to identify and address inequalities in health care provision and disparities in access to treatment, studies examining the extent to which race and/or ethnicity data are reported in the medical literature, and the quality of these data, are lacking. Therefore, we sought to objectively determine the quality of reporting of race and/or ethnicity in original medical research papers. Study Design and SettingA retrospective bibliometric analysis was used. Two independent investigators analyzed original articles investigating race/ethnicity, published between 2007 and 2018, in the 10 top-ranking academic journals in each of the following categories: general medicine, surgery, and oncology. ResultsA total of 995 original articles were included in our analysis. Only 45 studies (4.52%) provided a formal definition of race/ethnicity, and 8.94% identified the investigator responsible for the classification. While race/ethnicity was a key part of study design in 31.86% of the included investigations, the method used to classify individuals into racial/ethnic groups was described in only 10.25% of articles. In terms of terminology, we identified 81 different race/ethnicity classifications, but these were often imprecise and open to interpretation. ConclusionThere is significant room for improvement in the collection, reporting, and publishing of data describing ethnicity and/or race in the medical literature.

Health situation and health care of women aged 50 years and older in rural regions in Germany

Abstract Background In many countries demographic changes and regional differences lead to inequalities in healthcare provision. In Germany, this applies especially to rural regions and could affect the healthcare situation of middle-aged and older women in particular. Our study, which is part of the project “Frauen 5.0”, explores the health and healthcare situation of women 50 years and older in Northeastern Germany, with focus on outpatient gynaecological and general medical care and reasons for healthcare utilisation. Methods Our analyses comprise the health situation of women aged 50 years and older, their utilisation of outpatient gynaecologists and general practitioners (GPs), reasons for utilisation, access barriers to outpatient care, the demographic situation and the spatial distribution of gynaecological and GP practices in Northeastern Germany. We use a variety of data sources; main data source is the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1, 2008-2011), which was carried out by the Robert Koch Institute and is representative of the German adult population. Results There is an unequal distribution of gynaecologic and GP practices in Northeastern Germany, with the highest density in and around Berlin. About 30% of gynaecologists and GPs in the study region are aged 60 years and older. Whereas in all age groups at least 80% of women used GP services in the last 12 months, the use of gynaecologic services declines from 80% in 18- to 29 year-old to 45% in 70- to 79 year-old women. Most important reasons for seeking gynaecological treatment are menopause and early detection of cancer. Conclusions The analyses show that there is need to ensure adequate health care for women aged 50 and over in rural regions in Germany. Based on the results, within the project “Frauen 5.0” innovative solutions for this task, e.g. interprofessional cooperation, will be identified. Key messages Analyses of outpatient healthcare services show an unequal distribution of gynaecologic and GP practices in Northeastern Germany; about 30% of the gynaecologists and GPs are aged 60 years and older. Whereas in all age groups at least 80% of women used GP services in the last 12 months, the use of gynaecologic services declines from 80% in 18- to 29 year-old to 45% in 70- to 79 year-old women.

The "problem" of health: An analysis of health care provision in Canada's federal prisons.

The United Nations states that prisoners should enjoy the same standards of health care that are available in the community. Despite this, persons in prison experience barriers to care and face unique health challenges. Given the ways in which prisons shape health outcomes for incarcerated persons, it is important to interrogate how the provision of health care is governed in custodial settings. In this article, we examine one important aspect of governance: legislation governing the provision of health care in prisons. We view this issue through a critical lens, building on a body of poststructural scholarship which has illuminated how laws and policies are not merely tools of governance but also key sites for the production of meanings around social "problems," including the "problem of health." Taking Canada's Corrections and Conditional Release Act as a case example and applying Carol Bacchi's "What's the Problem Represented to Be" analytical framework, we examine how the specific representation of "health" in this legislation works to produce effects for persons in federal prison. Three key themes are formed through this analysis. First, what constitutes "essential services" in the context of federal prisons is more limited compared with the broader community. Second, the dichotomy between the rights of persons in prison versus the protection of society that is produced in development of these laws has significant bearing on the treatment of those in prison. Third, this representation has negative effects on the health of persons in prison. In order to meet United Nations standards, greater attention must be paid to the ways in which laws and other governing practices reproduce inequities in health care provision in prisons.

Putting placebo-controlled trials in developing countries to the interpersonal justifiability test.

This paper considers the ethics of placebo-controlled trials in developing countries, where a treatment already exists but is not available due to the low local standard of care. Such trials would not be permitted in more developed nations where a higher standard of care is available. I argue that there are moral intuitions against such trials, but a further intuition that if the trials were aimed at producing treatment options for the developing world, that would be more permissible than if the trials were designed with the benefit of rich world people in mind. An approach based upon GA Cohen's work on interpersonal justifiability is suggested to allow us to explain these intuitions. Cohen's framework shows that these trials are ethically problematic because the inequality in healthcare provision between developing and developed nations that allows them to take place is at least partly the pharmaceutical corporations' fault. Following Cohen's argument, this means the trials are non-comprehensively justified. This allows for a more complete explanation of our intuitions than to consider such trials as cases of exploitation, because intuitions on the ethicacy of research can vary even when the exploitation relation remains the same. It is then established that there is good empirical evidence to believe that pharmaceutical corporations do fail the interpersonal justifiability test. The policy implications of this judgement are then considered, and it is suggested that the framework might be equally applicable to examining the permissibility of research conducted on vulnerable people within more developed nations.

Global healthcare use by immigrants in Spain according to morbidity burden, area of origin, and length of stay.

BackgroundThe healthcare of immigrants is an important aspect of equity of care provision. Understanding how immigrants use the healthcare services based on their needs is crucial to establish effective health policy.MethodsThis retrospective, observational study included the total population of Aragon, Spain (1,251,540 individuals, of whom 11.9 % were immigrants). Patient-level data on the use of primary, specialised, hospital, and emergency care as well as prescription drug use in 2011 were extracted from the EpiChron Cohort and compared between immigrants and nationals. Multivariable standard or zero-inflated negative binomial regression models were generated, adjusting for age, sex, length of stay, and morbidity burden.ResultsThe annual visit rates of immigrants were lower than those of nationals for primary care (3.3 vs 6.4), specialised care (1.3 vs 2.7), planned hospital admissions/100 individuals (1.6 vs 3.8), unplanned hospital admissions/100 individuals (2.7 vs 4.7), and emergency room visits/10 individuals (2.3 vs 2.8). Annual prescription drug costs were also lower for immigrants (€47 vs €318). These differences were only partially attenuated after adjusting for age, sex and morbidity burden.ConclusionIn a universal coverage health system offering broad legal access to immigrants, the global use of healthcare services was lower for immigrants than for nationals. These differences may be explained in part by the healthy migration effect, but also reveal possible inequalities in healthcare provision that warrant further investigation.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3127-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Hiding the evidence: The state and spatial inequalities in health in Ireland

The Irish State has consistently reduced its production of publicly accessible disease / mortality maps over the last fifty years. State health statistics, and the small number of disease / mortality maps that have been produced in official publications, show a declining level of detail and are routinely out of date. Following a review of the production of disease / mortality maps in Ireland by the State and allied health agencies, two reasons are suggested for this decline. The first explanation relates to spatial inequalities in healthcare provision and to the absence of a health funding formulae in Ireland. The second explanation focuses on the potential politicisation of spatial inequalities in health status. Researchers in these fields are urged to disseminate information widely on spatial inequalities in healthcare provision, healthcare access and health status, both within and outside of the academic literature. Researchers in these fields are also urged to adopt an advocacy role on these issues, or to develop strategic alliances with such advocates.

Inequalities in healthcare provision for individuals with substance use disorders: perspectives from healthcare professionals and clients

Background: Little is known about inequalities in healthcare provision for individuals with substance use disorders. The main objective of this study was to assess expectations and perceptions of inequalities in healthcare provision among healthcare professionals (HCPs) and clients in treatment for substance use disorders.Method: General practitioners, healthcare professionals (HCPs) of mental healthcare- and specialized addiction services, and clients in treatment for substance use disorders filled out a questionnaire in which expectations and perceptions of inequalities in healthcare provision were assessed. Descriptive statistics and ANOVAs were used to illustrate the expectations and perceptions of respondents and to compare groups of respondents.Results: Approximately one-third of the respondents expected inequalities in healthcare provision, whereas perceptions of inequalities were less prevalent across all groups. Healthcare professionals were slightly more negative in their expectations compared to clients.Conclusion: This study provides insights into expectations and perceptions of professionals and clients about inequalities in healthcare provision. This study adds to the scarce body of literature concerning inequalities in healthcare provision from the perspective of HCPs and clients. More research, such as observational research, are needed in order to gain a better understanding of inequalities in the healthcare provision for clients with substance use disorders.

Experiences of self-management support from GPs among Australian ethnically diverse diabetes patients: A qualitative study

Ethnically diverse diabetes patients face significant challenges in diabetes self-management ranging from cultural expectations to inequalities in health care provision. This study explored the experiences of ethnically diverse patients with diabetes attending group diabetes education in receiving self-management support from GPs. An approach based on phenomenology was used to analyse participants’ experiences in self-management support across three group interviews comprising 28 Australian ethnically diverse diabetes patients: Arabic-speaking group (n = 11), English-speaking group (n = 9) and Vietnamese-speaking group (n = 8). Two themes emerged related to the poor quality of information to support self-management and challenges in negotiating traditional consultation styles. In particular, participants believed they knew more about diabetes self-management than their GPs but felt unable to influence consultation style and communicate their changing needs in self-management support. The health care and information needs of ethnically diverse patients continue to be marginalised within health systems. This small exploratory study highlights the need for further research to illuminate interactions between ethnically diverse diabetes patients and GPs in supporting long-term diabetes self-management.

Men’s health: a commentary

ENGAGING MEN in health care can be a challenge for clinicians. Engaging men in research exploring their experiences of health care, especially when there are particular sensitivities in the health issues being investigated, creates additional challenges, which too few researchers appear willing to address. The ethical principle of ‘justice’ dictates that researchers be fair to research participants and integral to this principle is the idea that there are no groups in society who cannot be involved in research. Sometimes that research might be complex and time-consuming but not undertaking research in such challenging groups risks creating an inequality in healthcare provision if there is a dearth of research evidence. Our two themed papers describe and reflect on the researchers’ experiences of undertaking qualitative research with men experiencing particularly sensitive health concerns.