Ineffective Esophageal Motility Research Articles

Ineffective Esophageal Motility: Current Criteria and Management

Ineffective Esophageal Motility: Current Criteria and Management

BN SO18 - Considering Physiology Surveillance in Patients with Oesophageal Atresia

Abstract Background Oesophageal atresia (OA) is a congenital malformation found between one in every 2,400 to 4,500 new-borns per year world-wide [1] who require immediate oesophageal surgery and lifelong endoscopic surveillance for complications of gastroesophageal reflux, oesophagitis, Barrett's oesophagus, anastomotic strictures, oesophageal dysmotility and dysphagia [2, 3]. This study investigates whether ad-hoc oesophageal physiology surveillance would be clinically beneficial for patients with post OA surgical history. Method Retrospective study was conducted on patients with surgical history for OA and undergone oesophageal physiology studies between 2010 and 2023. 11 patients were found (6 females) who had oesophageal physiology at mean age of 29 years (95% CI 26.7 to 35.3 years) or correspondingly post-surgery for OA. Standard high-resolution manometry assessment was re-interpreted with reference Chicago Classification(version 4.0)[4]. This followed by stimulation with multiple water swallowing and solid bolus swallows as adjunctive testing [5, 6, 7]. This project was approved by the NHS institution and the local research ethics committee (REC 18/NW/0120)(IRAS 333800). Results Major dysmotility was observed in 7 patients (63.6%)(achalasia 3, absent contractility(AC) 4) and minor dysmotility was apparent in 4 patients (ineffective oesophageal motility [IOM]). Development of major dysmotility was at a later onset post-surgery to minor dysmotility (30.4 years vs 26.5 years, p=0.214). As was achalasia to AC (32.3 years vs 29.0 years, p=0.379). Adjunctive testing augmented oesophageal smooth muscle contractility in all patients with IOM and invoked remaining neuromuscular functioning in 2 patients with AC. The achalasia diagnosis in the 3 patients remained unchanged during the adjunctive testing. Conclusion Oesophageal physiology surveillance in patients with post OA surgery would enable identifying the staging of the motility disorder and which may direct further surgical management. This study revealed patients were still suitable for partial fundoplication post OA surgery (54.5%) and surgical myotomy for achalasia (27.3%). The prevalence of achalasia (27.3%) and absent contractility (36.4%) in post OA surgery observed this study are significantly higher compared to the non-OA treatment-naïve patients found in the general population living with achalasia and absent contractility disorders.

Influence of Menthol Infusion on Esophageal Peristalsis in Patients With Ineffective Esophageal Motility.

Activation of the cold receptor, transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8) by menthol inhibits esophageal secondary peristalsis in healthy adults. Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is common. This study is to evaluate the effects of acute infusion of menthol on esophageal peristalsis in patients with IEM. Twenty patients with IEM (males 11, mean age 36) were studied for esophageal peristalsis using high-resolution manometry. All participant had primary peristalsis performed with 10 water swallows and secondary peristalsis generated with 10 rapid air injections of 20 mL via mid-esophageal infusion port. Two different sessions by randomly performing acute administration of placebo or menthol (3 mM) were used for testing their effects on esophageal peristalsis. Menthol infusion had no effects on distal contractile integral (P = 0.471), distal latency (P = 0.58), or complete peristalsis (P = 0.251). Menthol infusion did not change basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure (P = 0.321), esophagogastric junction contractile integral (P = 0.758), or integrated relaxation pressure (P = 0.375) of primary peristalsis, but reduced upper esophageal sphincter pressure (P = 0.037). Infusion of menthol significantly reduced the frequency of secondary peristalsis for air injects of 20 mL (P = 0.002), but did not affect distal contractile integral of secondary peristalsis for air injections of 20 mL. This work has suggested that activation of TRPM8 by menthol can attenuate mechanosensitivity of secondary peristalsis in response to rapid air distension regardless of the presence of IEM.

Additional Diagnostic Yield of the Rapid Drink Challenge in Chicago Classification Version 4.0 Compared With Version 3.0.

Chicago classification version 4.0 enhances the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders using position change and provocative tests such as multiple rapid swallows and a rapid drink challenge. This study investigates the diagnostic role of the rapid drink challenge based on Chicago classification 4.0 using a functional luminal imaging probe to estimate the cutoff value. This study included 570 patients who underwent esophageal manometry with a rapid drink challenge between January 2019 and October 2022. The diagnostic flow was analyzed according to Chicago classification 4.0. Ninety-nine patients (38, achalasia; 11, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction; 7, ineffective esophageal motility; 1, hypercontractile esophagus; and 42, normal esophageal function) failed the rapid drink challenge. Among the 453 participants, 50 and 86 were diagnosed with achalasia and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, respectively, using Chicago classification 4.0. In 249/453 (55.0%) patients initially diagnosed with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction using Chicago classification 3.0, the diagnosis was changed to achalasia (n = 28), hypercontractile esophagus (n = 7), ineffective esophageal motility (n = 7), or normal esophageal function (n = 121) using Chicago classification 4.0. Rapid drink challenge-integrated relaxation pressure's diagnostic cutoff value was 19 mmHg. Nine patients had diagnoses changed after the rapid drink challenge, including 3 with panesophageal pressurization. Chicago classification 4.0 increased the diagnostic yield of the rapid drink challenge by 2.0% (9/453 patients). However, the rapid drink challenge had a failure rate of 17.9% (99/552 patients). Given the relatively low diagnostic yield and high failure rate of the rapid drink challenge, we recommend adopting an individualized approach to manometry.

Clinical characteristics of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis and eosinophilic esophageal myositis based on esophageal motility.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) presents with various esophageal motility disorders, and some cases of hypercontractile esophagus (HE) are associated with eosinophilic esophageal myositis (EoEM). This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of patients with EoE and EoEM according to their esophageal motility. The 28 patients with EoE and 2 patients with EoEM were divided into three groups based on esophageal motility: normal motility group, hypomotility group, and spastic contraction group. The clinical characteristics of the three groups were retrospectively compared. Among the 28 patients with EoE, there were 15 with normal esophageal motility, 9 with hypomotility (2 with absent contractility, 7 with ineffective esophageal motility), and 4 with spastic contractions (1 with type III achalasia, 1 with HE, 2 with unclassifiable multipeak contractions). The two patients with EoEM had HE. Most patients in the normal and hypomotility groups had typical endoscopic findings of EoE, whereas these typical findings were less common in the spastic contraction group (P < 0.001). Four of the five patients with esophageal stricture were in the hypomotility group (P = 0.036). The therapy method significantly differed between the three groups: the normal group had more patients that responded to a proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker, the hypomotility group had more patients that responded to steroids, and the spastic contraction group contained two patients treated with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (P = 0.021). The endoscopic findings and therapy methods differ between patients with EoE and EoEM based on the esophageal motility.

Effects of capsaicin on esophageal peristalsis in humans using high resolution manometry.

Capsaicin-containing red pepper sauce suspension augments esophageal contraction amplitude on conventional manometry. This study used high-resolution manometry (HRM) to investigate if capsaicin infusion modulates segmental esophageal smooth muscle peristalsis in healthy adults. Sixteen healthy volunteers (mean age 37 years, 14 male) underwent HRM for the evaluation of primary peristalsis and secondary peristalsis using slow and rapid air distensions. Both primary and secondary peristalsis were assessed following infusions of capsaicin-containing red pepper sauce and saline. Capsaicin infusion significantly increased heartburn symptoms compared to saline infusion (p < 0.001), and significantly decreased threshold volumes of secondary peristalsis during rapid air distensions (p = 0.02). The frequency of secondary peristalsis during rapid air distensions was significantly increased by capsaicin infusion (p = 0.03). Neither capsaicin infusion (p = 0.06) nor saline infusion (p = 0.27) altered threshold volume during slow air distensions. Capsaicin infusion significantly increased distal contractile integral (DCI) of primary peristalsis (p = 0.04), particularly in the proximal smooth muscle segment (p = 0.048). It enhanced secondary peristalsis during rapid air distensions (p = 0.003) but not during slow air distension (p = 0.23). Saline infusion significantly increased DCI of secondary peristalsis during rapid air distension (p = 0.01). Augmentation of distension-induced secondary peristalsis can be modulated by activation of capsaicin-sensitive afferents similar to mechanosensitive afferents. Capsaicin-induced augmentation of primary peristalsis isolates to the cholinergic-mediated proximal smooth muscle segment, which warrants study in ineffective esophageal motility to determine therapeutic potential.

S3235 Middle Term Outcome of POEM on Patients With Ineffective Esophageal Motility: A Case Series

S3235 Middle Term Outcome of POEM on Patients With Ineffective Esophageal Motility: A Case Series

S600 Defining the Natural History of Ineffective Esophageal Motility and Change in Diagnosis with Updated Chicago Classification Criteria

S600 Defining the Natural History of Ineffective Esophageal Motility and Change in Diagnosis with Updated Chicago Classification Criteria

Normative high resolution esophageal manometry values in asymptomatic patients with obesity.

Surgical bariatric interventions, while highly effective, can be associated with post-operative esophageal symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux disease and esophageal dysmotility. Whether pre-operative physiology impacts this risk is unknown, in part because expected values on esophageal manometry in patients with obesity are not well understood. This study seeks to establish normative values on esophageal high resolution manometry (HRM) and the prevalence of esophageal dysmotility in the asymptomatic patient with obesity. This retrospective study included adult patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg m-2 without esophageal symptoms undergoing preoperative bariatric surgical evaluation, including HRM, at a single tertiary care center between February, 2019 and February, 2020. Of 104 asymptomatic patients with obesity, HRM identified normal esophageal motility in 94 (90.4%) with the remaining 10 having ineffective esophageal motility (3.8%), manometric esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (3.8%), distal esophageal spasm (1.0%), and hypercontractile esophagus (1.0%). Mean of median lower esophageal sphincter integrated relaxation pressure (LES IRP) was 10.6 mmHg supine (95th percentile 21.5 mmHg) and 8.5 mmHg upright (95th percentile 21.3 mmHg). 86% of patients had intragastric pressure above 8 mmHg. Mean of mean distal contractile integral (DCI) was 2261.6 mmHg cm s-1 (95th percentile 5889.5 mmHg cm s-1). The vast majority of asymptomatic patients with obesity had normal manometry. LES IRP and DCI were higher than that observed in non-obese cohorts. Additionally, BMI correlated to increased intragastric pressure. These data suggest that normative values in patients with obesity should be adjusted to prevent overdiagnosis of EGJOO or hypercontractile esophagus.

Comparative Prevalence of Ineffective Esophageal Motility: Impact of Chicago v4.0 vs. v3.0 Criteria.

Background and Objectives: The threshold for ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) diagnosis was changed in Chicago v4.0. Our aim was to determine IEM prevalence using the new criteria and the differences between patients with definite IEM versus "inconclusive diagnosis". Materials and Methods: We retrospectively selected IEM and fragmented peristalsis (FP) patients from the high-resolution esophageal manometries (HREMs) database. Clinical, demographic data and manometric parameters were recorded. Results: Of 348 HREMs analyzed using Chicago v3.0, 12.3% of patients had IEM and 0.86% had FP. Using Chicago v4.0, 8.9% of patients had IEM (IEM-4 group). We compared them with the remaining 16 with an inconclusive diagnosis of IEM (borderline group). Dysphagia (77% vs. 44%, Z-test = 2.3, p = 0.02) and weight loss were more commonly observed in IEM-4 compared to the borderline group. The reflux symptoms were more prevalent in the borderline group (87.5% vs. 70.9%, p = 0.2). Type 2 or 3 esophagogastric junction morphology was more prevalent in the borderline group (81.2%) vs. 64.5% in IEM-4 (p = 0.23). Distal contractile integral (DCI) was lower in IEM-4 vs. the borderline group, and resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and mean integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) were similar. The number of ineffective swallows and failed swallows was higher in IEM-4 compared to the borderline group. Conclusions: Using Chicago v4.0, less than 10% of patients had a definite diagnosis of IEM. The dominant symptom was dysphagia. Only DCI and the number of failed and inefficient swallows were different between definite IEM patients and borderline cases.

Defining lower esophageal sphincter physiomechanical states among esophageal motility disorders using functional lumen imaging probe panometry.

Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) panometry assesses esophageal motility in response to controlled volumetric distension. This study aimed to describe the physiomechanical states of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in response to serial filling/emptying regimes for esophageal motility disorders. Fourty-five patients with absent contractile response on FLIP and diagnoses of normal motility (n = 6), ineffective esophageal motility (IEM; n = 8), scleroderma (SSc; n = 10), or nonspastic achalasia (n = 21) were included, as were 20 patient controls with normal motility on FLIP and manometry. LES diameter and pressure were measured after stepwise FLIP filling at 60 mL, 70 mL, and emptying to 60 mL with relative changes used to define physiomechanical states. Passive dilatation after FLIP filling occurred in 63/65 (97%) patients among all diagnoses. After FLIP emptying, passive shortening occurred in 12/14 (86%) normal motility/IEM, 10/10 (100%) SSc, 9/21(43%) achalasia, and 16/20 (80%) controls, with auxotonic relaxation seen in 2/14 (14%) normal motility/IEM, 12/21 (57%) achalasia, and 4/20 (20%) controls. After achalasia treatment (LES myotomy), 21/21 (100%) achalasia had passive shortening after FLIP emptying. Physiomechanical states of the LES can be determined via response to FLIP filling and emptying regimes. While passive shortening was the general response to FLIP emptying, auxotonic relaxation was observed in achalasia, which was disrupted by LES myotomy. Further investigation is warranted into the clinical impact on diagnosis and treatment of esophageal motility disorders.

371. ENDOFLIP: THE FUTURE OF DYSPHAGIA DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT

Abstract Background High-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for characterizing esophageal motility disorders, but it’s frequently associated with poor patient tolerance. A newer diagnostic tool, the Endoscopic Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP), has emerged to assess esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility and distension-mediated peristalsis. Also, for motility disorders such as EGJ outflow obstruction (EGJOO), HRM-isolated features aren’t enough for the diagnosis. The diagnosis also requires symptom correlation and additional investigations like EndoFLIP. Methods We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study for patients with dysphagia and inconclusive or intolerant to HRM. The inclusion criteria were patients with an elevated median integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on HRM and patients with an inconclusive or intolerant to HRM. Patients with isolated IRP on HRM were included, as this isolated finding does not allow for the definitive diagnosis of EGJOO. These patients underwent EndoFLIP testing from January 2022 to February 2024 at a tertiary center. Results We performed EndoFLIP on 42 patients (50% male; 50% female), 23,8% with EGJOO diagnosis on HRM, 21,4% with inconclusive HRM, and 54,8% patients intolerant to HRM. Twenty-three patients intolerant to HRM underwent EndoFLIP, enabling diagnosis in all cases. Four patients were diagnosed with EGJOO, 6 with achalasia, and 4 with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). On 88% of patients, the EndoFLIP allowed a correct diagnosis and treatment, with 29% undergoing endoscopic treatment during the same procedure. 9 patients with inconclusive HRM were diagnosed after EndoFLIP: 3 were diagnosed with EGJOO, 4 with IEM, and 3 with achalasia. We report a significant discordance between EGJOO diagnosis on HRM and EndoFLIP results. 50% of patients diagnosed with EGJOO on HRM showed normal EndoFLIP results, with only 20% confirming the diagnosis, while 20% raised the possibility of the diagnosis being achalasia. 43,8% of patients diagnosed with EGJOO confirmed by EndoFLIP underwent endoscopic therapy with botulinum toxin or balloon dilation during the same procedure, resulting in clinical improvement for all patients. Discussion The discordance between HRM and EndoFLIP may arise from HRM's tendency to overdiagnose EJGOO, leading to unnecessary testing and treatments for EGJOO. Many EGJOO HRM diagnoses don't require therapy, as symptoms often resolve spontaneously or with dietary education, casting doubt on the isolated HRM finding's clinical significance. It's particularly beneficial for patients with inconclusive/intolerance to HRM, allowing correct diagnosis and treatment in cases of obstructive symptoms. These results support EndoFLIP as a screening tool for patients undergoing endoscopy, enabling better selection of those benefiting from subsequent HRM.

213. A NEW MANOMETRIC TOOL TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY OF LAPAROSCOPIC ANTIREFLUX SURGERY

Abstract Background High resolution manometry (HRM) has been proven able to describe the pathophysiological pathway leading to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Recently, a new manometric tool, the Milan Score (MS), has been introduced and validated to evaluate the risk of pathologic GERD, defined as Acid Exposure Time (AET) &amp;gt;6% at pH-study. Aim of this study is to validate this score in the post-operative assessment after laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS). Methods All patients who underwent HRM after LARS between October 2020 and May 2023 were included. The MS was calculated assessing four manometric variables: esophagogastric junction (EGJ) type, EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI), ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and response to the straight leg raise (SLR) manoeuvre. The MS was considered pathologic if ≥137 (risk of GERD ≥50%). The risk of GERD was categorized into six classes, according to the MS score. The MS was compared with validated questionnaires for reflux symptoms, including GERD Questionnaire (GERD-Q), GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), and with postoperative endoscopy findings. Results A total of 160 patients were included (63% males, age: 53 years, time from surgery: 30 months). Surgical techniques included magnetic sphincter augmentation in 54% of patients, Toupet fundoplication in 29% and Nissen or Dor fundoplication in 17%. The proportion of patients with MS ≥137 among those with pathologic questionnaires was 73% for GERD-Q (p&amp;lt;0.001), 75% for GERD-HRQL (p&amp;lt;0.001) and 78% for RSI (p&amp;lt;0.001). The rate of pathologic questionnaires increased for higher MSs. A MS ≥137 was related to recurrent hiatal hernia (23%, p=0.046) and esophagitis (21%, p=0.007) at endoscopy. Clinical and manometric outcomes were similar among different surgical techniques. Conclusions The MS is an efficient tool to assess the efficacy of LARS. Various surgical techniques have similar distribution in the different risk classes for GERD identified by MS, and similar clinical results. HRM with MS represent an easy and feasible assessment of surgical outcomes after LARS, providing an objective evaluation of the antireflux barrier after surgery.

280. MANOMETRIC FINDINGS IN PATIENTS WITH GIANT HIATAL HERNIA: OESOPHAGEAL PHYSIOLOGY APPEARS TO IMPROVE WITH SURGERY

Abstract Background High resolution manometry (HRM) is a gold standard test of oesophageal physiology. The use of HRM in patients with giant hiatus hernia (GHH) is limited by historical technical challenges as well as unclear clinical implications of the findings. The aim of this study is to demonstrate feasibility of HRM in patients with GHH and study effect of surgery on oesophageal physiology of patients undergoing GHH repair. Methods Data was extracted from a prospectively populated database of patients with giant (&amp;gt;30% stomach above diaphragm) hiatus hernias. All patients that underwent HRM before and after surgery were included. Manometric findings before and after surgery were analysed and compared. Patient symptoms were correlated with manometric findings. Results Inclusion criteria were met by 30 patients: 83% female, average age 74 (range 51-86), 93% had type III hernia containing on average 55% of stomach. All operations but one were performed laparoscopically. Pre-operatively average LOS length was 1.89cm which improved significantly to 2.19cm after surgery (p&amp;lt;0.05). Nine patients had ineffective oesophageal motility on index study which normalised post operatively in 4 patients. Lower oesophageal sphincter integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) increased post-operatively from 9.07mmHg to 11.52mmHg (p&amp;lt;0.05). Distal contractility improved post-operatively, however this was not significant. Most common presenting symptoms were dyspnoea, anaemia, retrosternal pain, and dysphagia. There was no association between dysphagia and manometric findings before or after surgery. Conclusion This study provides an insight into HRM findings in patients with GHH before and after surgery. Majority of the physiological parameters improved with surgery. There was no correlation of symptom of dysphagia with manometric findings.

363. REFLUX MICRO-ASPIRATION: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED

Abstract Background The accurate diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux pulmonary microaspiration has only become possible recently with the introduction of a novel technique of reflux micro-aspiration scintigraphy study combined with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) combined with x-ray tomography (CT) in a hybrid instrument. This has allowed the accurate diagnosis of pulmonary and airway contamination with refluxate. Previously only patients with large volume symptomatic reflux aspiration were diagnosed clinically (Mendelson syndrome) or by 2-dimentional barium meal or an older plantar (2 dimensional) technique of scintigraphic aspiration studies. The concept of reflux micro-aspiration has been implicated in multiple pulmonary diseases but without absolute proof from an adequate diagnostic test. Little was known about the natural history, physiology, and response to treatment amongst patients with silent reflux micro-aspiration. The aim of this presentation is to summarise a series of research projects studying the natural history of the disease, common presenting symptoms, pathophysiology and response to treatment. Methods A prospectively populated database of patients referred to a tertiary specialist reflux diagnostic service with atypical and/or treatment resistant reflux was evaluated. The database contained records of consecutive patients including demographic information, presenting symptoms, investigations including imaging, upper gastro-intestinal physiology studies and novel reflux micro-aspiration scintigraphy studies. Treatment details including medical and surgical treatment and post treatment clinical information and investigations. Multiple studies were conducted using the information from the database and findings are summarised in this presentation. Results The novel reflux micro-aspiration scintigraphy with SPECT/CT was compared with other studies (multichannel intraluminal impedance and 24-hour pH monitoring) and was found to be sensitive to reflux occurring outside the oesophagus. Patients with reflux micro-aspiration can present a wide variety of symptoms, commonly a combination of typical symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (heartburn and regurgitation) and respiratory symptoms. Reflux micro-aspiration was associated with reduced lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, severe ineffective oesophageal motility (IOM), and pharyngeal contamination with refluxate on reflux scintigraphy. Delayed liquid gastric emptying was not associated with reflux micro-aspiration, however gastroparesis with solids is associated with micro-aspiration. Micro-aspiration was common in patients with giant hiatus hernias and mostly resolved with surgery. Anti-reflux surgery resulted in resolution of aspiration in the majority of patients, however severe IOM was associated with lesser rates of microaspiration resolution. Conclusion Reflux micro-aspiration appears to be a more common manifestation of GORD than previously thought. The work summarised in this presentation discusses the presentation, physiological associations, and treatment of patients with reflux micro-aspiration.

383. LOSS OF PERISTALTIC RESERVE DETERMINED BY MULTIPLE RAPID SWALLOWS CORRELATES WITH DYSPHAGIA AND POOR BOLUS TRANSIT IN INEFFECTIVE ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY

Abstract Introduction Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is a common finding on high resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) and is often of unclear clinical significance as its impact on dysphagia and bolus transit is variable. Multiple rapid swallow (MRS) testing is a provocative maneuver performed during HRM that assesses peristaltic reserve, documented by the presence of contractile augmentation (defined by contractile vigor after MRS greater than that seen with single swallows). Lack of augmentation after MRS is associated with dysphagia after anti-reflux surgery. To date, no studies have evaluated the impact of peristaltic reserve on dysphagia and bolus transit in IEM patients. Methods Retrospective review of 159 patients with Chicago classification 4.0 IEM. 52 patients were excluded due to prior esophageal surgery, technically inadequate MRS, or concomitant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Demographics and brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire (BEDQ) results were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. MRS and bolus transit data were analyzed using a commercially available software. Impedance analysis documented complete versus incomplete bolus transit. Augmentation was defined as the ratio of post-MRS DCI to mean single swallow DCI &amp;gt; 1. Fisher's exact test for continuous data and linear model ANOVA were used to assess for statistical significance. Results 107 IEM patients were included, 46 of them had loss of peristaltic reserve (no augmentation on MRS). Compared to IEM patients with augmentation, those without augmentation had more severe dysphagia documented by higher mean BEDQ score (6.8 versus 4.8, p= 0.045), and increased rates of impaired bolus transit (73% versus 55%, p-= 0.013). Discussion IEM patients without augmentation on MRS have more severe dysphagia and more frequent incomplete bolus clearance. These findings support adding MRS response to the diagnosis of IEM or using it to describe a subset of patients with more severe disease.

Esophageal Dysmotility in Multiple System Atrophy: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Background/Objective: Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is often associated with dysphagia and esophageal dysmotility (ED). However, ED in patients with MSA is poorly understood. To assess the relationship between ED, dysphagia, and other clinical findings in such patients and investigate the details of ED in MSA using high-resolution manometry (HRM). Methods: Patients from The University of Tokyo Hospital with MSA who underwent swallowing examinations, esophagography, and HRM between 2017 and 2022 were enrolled. A retrospective chart review of patients' backgrounds, swallowing function, and esophageal motility was performed. ED was evaluated using the Chicago Classification version 4.0. Results: Seventy-four patients with MSA were identified. The median age was 64 years, 48 patients (65%) were male, and the cerebellar variant type was predominant (69%). Abnormal upper esophageal sphincter (UES) resting pressure was observed in 34 patients (46%) and intraesophageal stasis in 65 (88%). High-severity MSA was a risk factor for developing dysphagia, vocal fold movement impairment, and abnormal UES function (p < 0.05). However, no overt clinical risk factors for ED were identified. Various types of ED were detected using HRM, and ineffective esophageal motility was the most frequent disorder. Conclusions: ED is a common occurrence in patients with MSA. Although a high-severity MSA may be a risk factor for developing dysphagia and vocal fold motion impairment, ED can occur regardless of clinical severity. Since ED is rarely detected based on subjective symptoms, careful evaluation of esophageal motility by esophagography or HRM is warranted in patients with MSA.

Spectrum of esophageal manometry and 24-h pH impedance findings in non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and response to phenotype-based treatment-A prospective observational study.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is classified into erosive reflux disease (ERD) and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). NERD includes three phenotypes: true NERD, functional heartburn (FH) and reflux hypersensitivity (RH). The management of these NERD phenotypes differs. We aimed at studying the spectrum of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and 24-hour impedance-pH findings in Indian patients with NERD, classifying the phenotypes and assessing the response to phenotype-based treatment. We prospectively studied the clinical characteristics, endoscopy, HRM, 24-hour impedance-pH findings, symptom association and response to phenotype-specific treatment in patients with NERD. Of 53 patients with NERD, the following phenotypes were diagnosed namely: 35(66%) true NERD, 12(22.7%) RH and six(11.3%) FH. The esophagogastric junction-contractile integral (EGJ-CI) was low in 60.4% and ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) was present in 53% of patients. The respective median values for true NERD, RH and FH groups were as follows: proximal mean nocturnal baseline impedance (P-MNBI) 2250Ω, 2241Ω, 2550Ω, (p = 0.592), distal (D-MNBI) 1431Ω, 2887.5Ω, 2516Ω (p < 0.001), post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWI) 11.1%, 16%, 18.7% (p = 0.127). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses showed that D-MNBI and PSPWI discriminated FH and RH from true NERD, respectively, with a cut-off of 2376.5Ω (area under curve [AUC]:0.919, p < 0.001), 22.6% (AUC:0.671, p = 0.184) and 2318Ω (AUC:0.919, p = < 0.001), 16.2%(AUC:0.671, p = 0.079). The median P-MNBI was lower in patients with GERD-associated cough than other symptoms 1325 (1250, -). Fifty (94.3%) patients showed significant improvement in symptom severity scores (p < 0.001) following phenotype-specific treatment. In NERD patients, EGJ-CI and IEM were low. D-MNBI and PSPWI could effectively discriminate true NERD from FH and RH, whereas P-MNBI could help diagnose GERD-associated cough. The phenotype-specific treatment provides better symptom relief for patients.

Relevance of ineffective esophageal motility to striated esophageal muscle contraction: Studies with high-resolution manometry.

Striated esophageal muscle contraction (SEC) is important for pharyngeal swallowing and deglutition augmentation against aspiration. Its clinical relevance is unclear in patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). In this study, we aimed to characterize and compare SEC in consecutive patients with and without IEM. All eligible patients were evaluated for SEC, primary and secondary peristalsis using high-resolution manometry (HRM) with one mid-esophageal injection port. Primary peristalsis was assessed with 10 5-mL liquid swallows and multiple rapid swallows (MRS), while secondary peristalsis was performed with rapid air injections of 20 mL. All peristatic parameters of HRM were measured, and SEC and its contractile integral (SECI) were evaluated. One hundred and forty patients (59.3% women, mean age 46.1 ± 13.1 years) were included. There was no difference in SECI between patients with and without IEM (p = 0.91). SECI was also similar between patients with and without secondary peristalsis for IEM (p = 0.63) or normal motility (p = 0.80). No difference in SECI was seen between patients with and without MRS for IEM (p = 0.55) or normal motility (p = 0.88). SECI was significantly higher in male patients than female patients in IEM patients (p = 0.01). SECI significantly correlated with age in patients with normal motility (r = -0.31, p = 0.01). Aging may have a negative impact on SEC in patients with normal motility, while gender difference in SECI occurs in IEM patients. Neither secondary peristalsis nor MRS influences SECI.

Impact of Esophageal Motility on Microbiome Alterations in Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients With Negative Endoscopy: Exploring the Role of Ineffective Esophageal Motility and Contraction Reserve.

Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is common in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and can be associated with poor esophageal contraction reserve on multiple rapid swallows. Alterations in the esophageal microbiome have been reported in GERD, but the relationship to presence or absence of contraction reserve in IEM patients has not been evaluated. We aim to investigate whether contraction reserve influences esophageal microbiome alterations in patients with GERD and IEM. We prospectively enrolled GERD patients with normal endoscopy and evaluated esophageal motility and contraction reserve with multiple rapid swallows during high-resolution manometry. The esophageal mucosa was biopsied for DNA extraction and 16S ribosomal RNA gene V3-V4 (Illumina)/full-length (Pacbio) amplicon sequencing analysis. Among the 56 recruited patients, 20 had normal motility (NM), 19 had IEM with contraction reserve (IEM-R), and 17 had IEM without contraction reserve (IEM-NR). Esophageal microbiome analysis showed a significant decrease in microbial richness in patients with IEM-NR when compared to NM. The beta diversity revealed different microbiome profiles between patients with NM or IEM-R and IEM-NR (P = 0.037). Several esophageal bacterial taxa were characteristic in patients with IEM-NR, including reduced Prevotella spp. and Veillonella dispar, and enriched Fusobacterium nucleatum. In a microbiome-based random forest model for predicting IEM-NR, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 was yielded. In symptomatic GERD patients with normal endoscopic findings, the esophageal microbiome differs based on contraction reserve among IEM. Absent contraction reserve appears to alter the physiology and microbiota of the esophagus.