Indwelling Inferior Vena Cava Filters Research Articles

Mechanical thrombectomy of inferior vena cava filter-associated caval thrombosis using FlowTriever and ClotTriever systems

ObjectiveChronically indwelling inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) can have multiple adverse sequelae, including IVCF-associated thrombosis. The Inari ClotTriever and FlowTriever mechanical and aspiration thrombectomy systems (Inari Medical) can be used for acute caval thrombosis associated with IVCFs if appropriate proximal IVCF protection is used intraprocedurally. The present study reports a single institution's outcomes after ClotTriever and FlowTriever thrombectomy of acute IVCF-associated iliocaval thrombus. MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent ClotTriever or FlowTriever thrombectomy for IVCF-associated caval thrombosis. The patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and postprocedural outcomes of a 15-patient cohort were compiled and described. ResultsA total of 15 patients were identified as presenting with acute IVCF-associated caval thrombosis and having undergone intervention with either the ClotTriever or FlowTriever system from 2019 to 2022. Of the 15 patients in the cohort, 3 (20%) had presented with a threatened extremity (phlegmasia cerulea dolens), and 12 had presented with severe, debilitating, but non–limb-threatening, lower extremity edema. The preprocedural clot burden was significant and involved the cava, iliac veins, and femoropopliteal veins in 7 of 15 patients (47%) in the cohort. The procedure was technically successful in 11 patients (73.33%). Resolution of acute symptoms was noted in 100% of the technically successful procedures. The 30-day mortality rate was 13% (2 of 15 patients). One intraprocedural death occurred from pulmonary embolism, and one patient died of malignancy complications. The surviving patients not lost to follow-up experienced stable or improving venous disease, with only one patient presenting with post-phlebitic syndrome. ConclusionsMechanical and aspiration thrombectomy of IVCF-associated thrombus with the FlowTriever and ClotTriever systems have good technical success and resulted in significant improvement in acute symptoms with adequate clot clearance. Proximal embolic protection maneuvers for pulmonary embolism prophylaxis and preexisting filter protection are required intraprocedurally.

Reengaging patients with forgotten filters through an institutional multidisciplinary approach

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcomes of a hospital-wide multidisciplinary initiative to reengage and manage patients with unretrieved chronic indwelling inferior vena cava (IVC) filters placed at a large tertiary care center, who had been lost to follow-up. MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of outcomes from a completed multidisciplinary quality improvement project. The quality improvement project identified and contacted (via letter) patients with chronic indwelling IVC filters placed at a single tertiary care center from 2008 to 2016 who were alive and without evidence of filter retrieval in the medical records. A total of 316 eligible patients were mailed a letter regarding their chronic indwelling IVC filter and the updated recommendations regarding IVC filter removal. The letter included institutional contact information, and all the patients who responded were offered a clinic visit to discuss potential filter retrieval. In the retrospective review, we assessed the outcomes of the quality improvement project, including the patient response rate, follow-up clinic visits, new imaging studies generated, retrieval rate, procedural success, and complications. The patient demographics and filter characteristics were collected and evaluated for correlations with the response and retrieval rates. ResultsThe patient response rate to the letter was 32% (101 of 316). Of the 101 patients who responded, 72 (71%) were seen in clinic and 59 (82%) underwent new imaging studies. Using standard and advanced techniques, 34 of 36 filters after a median dwell time of 9.4 years (range, 3.3-13.3 years) were successfully retrieved (94% success rate). The patients with a documented IVC filter complication were more likely to respond to the letter (odds ratio, 4.34) and undergo IVC filter retrieval (odds ratio, 6.04). No moderate or severe procedural complications occurred during filter retrieval. ConclusionsAn institutional, multidisciplinary quality initiative successfully identified and reengaged patients with chronic indwelling IVC filters who had been lost to follow-up. The filter retrieval success rate was high and procedural morbidity low. Institution-wide efforts to identify and retrieve chronic indwelling filters are feasible.

Stenting across inferior vena cava filters can be a safe and effective alternative to complex retrieval

ObjectiveVenous stenting for acute and chronic venous disease has been increasingly used as more evidence has accumulated on the efficacy and durability of these interventions for symptomatic patients. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters that could have been present for years will often be implicated in the obstructive pathology and removal can be challenging. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether stenting across an indwelling IVC filter is a safe and effective alternative to removal. MethodsConsecutive patients who had undergone iliocaval stenting at our institution from 2007 to 2020 were identified and divided into groups stratified by the presence of an IVC filter. The operative notes, venography findings, and the electronic health records were queried to obtain the operative details, patient characteristics, postoperative outcomes, stent patency, and survival outcomes. The primary end point was iliocaval stent patency. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of an IVC filter with or without overstenting. We used the χ2 test and survival analysis as appropriate. ResultsA total of 224 consecutive patients were identified, of whom 71 were found to have undergone iliocaval stenting (age, 48 ± 18 years; 47.9% male; body mass index, 31 ± 9 kg/m2). Of the 71 patients, 15 had had stents placed across an indwelling IVC filter (overstented group) and 56 had not had an IVC filter present (non-overstented group). No differences were found in presentation between the overstented group (acute occlusion, 4 of 15 [26.7%]; chronic occlusion, 8 of 15 [53.3%]; and nonocclusive lesions, 3 of 15 [20%]) and the non-overstented group (acute occlusion, 29 of 56 [52%]; chronic occlusion, 18 of 56 [32%]; nonocclusive lesions, 9 of 56 [16%]; P = .2). Comparisons between the two groups revealed no differences in the baseline characteristics except for age (overstented, 57 ± 15 years; non-overstented, 46 ± 18 years; P = 0.03), preoperative anticoagulation therapy (overstented, 66.6%; non-overstented, 26.9%; P = .01), and bilateral leg symptoms (overstented, 86.7%; non-overstented, 23.2%; P < .001). Primary patency at 30 months was 85.6% in the overstented group and 86.1% in the non-overstented group (P = .78). At follow-up, no adverse events related to filter crushing were reported, and no differences were found in 30-month survival. ConclusionsIn our single-center, retrospective study of iliocaval stenting, patients who had undergone overstenting across an indwelling IVC filter had had patency rates similar to those whose stents had been placed with no IVC filter in place. Thus, complex IVC filter removal, when not possible or when the risk of operative complications is too high, can be forgone in favor of stenting across the IVC filter, with no implications on midterm patency or adverse events.

Lethal hemorrhage from iliac vein rupture complicating inferior vena cava thrombosis demonstrated by post-mortem CT angiography.

Spontaneous iliac vein rupture is a rare cause of retroperitoneal hemorrhage that may present to the forensic pathologist. It has been reported in association with venous thrombosis, anatomical variants such as May-Thurner syndrome, and as a complication of a long-term indwelling IVC filter. It has a female predominance and most often occurs due to rupture of the left iliac vein. This is the first report of the use of post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) and post-mortem computed tomography angiography (PMCTA) as an adjunct to a conventional autopsy to diagnose rupture of the left iliac vein causing retroperitoneal hemorrhage arising as a complication of an inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus. We discuss the use of PMCTA as a useful tool in the diagnosis of vascular injury and how it can be used to assist the forensic pathologist. The use of PMCT with PMCTA is an invaluable adjunct to conventional autopsy to diagnose the site of vascular rupture.

Pregnancy in women with an inferior vena cava filter: a tertiary center experience and overview of the literature

Patients with an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter that remains in situ encounter a lifelong increased risk of deep vein thrombosis and IVC filter complications including fracture, perforation, and IVC filter thrombotic occlusion. Data on the safety of becoming pregnant with an in situ IVC filter are scarce. The objective was to evaluate the risk of complications of in situ IVC filters during pregnancy. We performed a retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients with an in situ IVC filter from a tertiary center between 2000 and 2020. We collected data on complications of IVC filters and pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, we performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and gray literature. We identified 7 pregnancies in 4 patients with in situ IVC filters with a mean time since IVC filter insertion of 3 years (range, 1-8). No complications of IVC filter occurred during pregnancy. Review of literature yielded five studies including 13 pregnancies in 9 patients. In 1 pregnancy a pre-existent, until then asymptomatic, chronic perforation of the vena cava wall by the IVC filter caused major bleeding and uterine trauma with fetal loss. Overall, the complication rate was 5%. It seems safe to become pregnant with an indwelling IVC filter that is intact and does not show signs of perforation, but because of the low number of cases, no firm conclusions about safety of in situ IVC filters during pregnancy can be drawn. We suggest imaging before pregnancy to reveal asymptomatic IVC filter complications.

Contemporary management of chronic indwelling inferior vena cava filters

ObjectiveDespite increasing retrieval rates of the inferior vena cava (IVC) filter, less than one-third are removed within the recommended timeline. Prolonged filter dwell times may increase the technical difficulty of retrieval and filter-related complications. We sought to evaluate the contemporary outcomes of patients with chronic indwelling IVC filters at a tertiary care center. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed from August 2015 through August 2019 of all patients who were referred for removal of a prolonged IVC filter with a dwell time >1 year. Descriptive analysis was used to evaluate patients' characteristics and procedural outcomes, which were reviewed through electronic medical records. Data were expressed as median with interquartile range (IQR) or number and percentage, as appropriate. ResultsA total of 47 patients were identified with a median filter dwell time of 10.0 years (IQR, 6-13 years); 34 patients underwent IVC filter removal, and 13 patients refused retrieval. The median age of patients was 54.9 years (IQR, 42.5-64.0 years); the majority were female (57%) and white (53%). The most common indication for filter placement was high risk despite anticoagulation (49%), followed by venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (21%). The majority of patients were symptomatic (72%). If symptomatic, the most common reason for retrieval was IVC penetration (94%), and the chief complaint was pain (56%). Retrieval success was 97%, with a median length of stay of 0 days. The majority of retrievals were performed through an endovascular approach (97%). There was one postprocedural complication (3%). ConclusionsDespite prolonged dwell times, IVC filter retrieval can be performed safely and effectively in carefully selected patients at a tertiary referral center.

Radiologists' Field Guide to Permanent Inferior Vena Cava Filters.

OBJECTIVE. Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are commonly used in patients at risk for life-threatening pulmonary embolism. Since the Mobin-Uddin filter was introduced in 1967, numerous other IVC filters have been developed. Given the plethora of IVC filter types, inaccurate identification of a filter on radiographic examination can lead to confusion in the options for filter retrieval and anticoagulation. CONCLUSION. This article highlights permanent IVC designs to assist the interpretation of diagnostic studies. Accurate identification of indwelling IVC filters could have a dramatic effect on patient management regarding anticoagulant use and possibility for IVC filter retrieval and removal. Identification of filter type, filter position, presence or absence of thrombosis, filter tilt, and filter fracture should be included in interpretive reports.

Vena Cava Filter Retrieval with Aorto-Iliac Arterial Strut Penetration.

To evaluate the safety and technical success of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter retrieval in the setting of aorto-iliac arterial strut penetration. IVC filter registries from six large United States IVC filter retrieval practices were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent IVC filter retrieval in the setting of filter strut penetration into the adjacent aorta or iliac artery. Patient demographics, implant duration, indication for placement, IVC filter type, retrieval technique and technical success, adverse events, and post procedural clinical outcomes were identified. Arterial penetration was determined based on pre-procedure CT imaging in all cases. The IVC filter retrieval technique used was at the discretion of the operating physician. Seventeen patients from six US centers who underwent retrieval of an IVC filter with at least one strut penetrating either the aorta or iliac artery were identified. Retrieval technical success rate was 100% (17/17), without any major adverse events. Post-retrieval follow-up ranging from 10 days to 2 years (mean 4.6 months) was available in 12/17 (71%) patients; no delayed adverse events were encountered. Findings from this series suggest that chronically indwelling IVC filters with aorto-iliac arterial strut penetration may be safely retrieved.

Contemporary outcomes of elective iliocaval and infrainguinal venous intervention for post-thrombotic chronic venous occlusive disease

Patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis are at risk for development of post-thrombotic syndrome. Iliac vein stenting has been shown to significantly improve clinical outcomes in patients with venous outflow obstruction, although many studies include a heterogeneous population with several different venous pathologic processes. Our objective was to evaluate the results of iliocaval and infrainguinal venous intervention for venous outflow obstruction due to post-thrombotic chronic venous occlusive disease. All patients treated at a single institution for symptomatic iliocaval venous occlusive lesions with and without infrainguinal extension between 2008 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions were excluded from analysis. All patients with symptomatic post-thrombotic occlusion of the iliac vein or inferior vena cava (IVC) and a Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology (CEAP) score of 3 or greater were included. Demographics of the patients, presence of IVC filters at presentation, presenting CEAP score, postintervention CEAP score, primary and secondary patency, wound healing and subjective clinical improvement outcomes, and procedural details were recorded in a database. There were 105 patients with symptomatic iliocaval venous occlusive lesions identified, of which 31 patients (42limbs) met inclusion criteria. Presenting symptoms included pain or swelling (100%); venous claudication (81%); and CEAP class 3 (76%), 4 or 5 (14%), or 6 (10%). All patients presented with either subacute (>30days [35%]) or chronic (>90days [65%]) iliocaval venous thrombosis. Procedural technical success with venous recanalization was achieved in 100% of cases and in 46% of IVC filter retrieval attempts. Overall clinical improvement was achieved in 84% of patients; complete clinical resolution was obtained in 42% and a decrease in CEAP score in 65%. At a mean follow-up of 14.7months (range, 2-49months), primary and secondary 1-year patency was 66% and 75% overall, and primary patency was equivalent between patients requiring isolated iliac venous stenting and those requiring infrainguinal stent extension (68% vs 65%, respectively; P= .74, not significant). Patients who presented with IVC filters had a higher rate of complete clinical resolution if the filter could be removed (100%) compared with those patients in whom the filter could not be removed (17%; P< .01). Treatment of chronic venous occlusive disease with iliocaval and infrainguinal venous stenting is associated with acceptable1-year patency rates, healing of venous ulcers, and a significant reduction in symptoms and CEAP score. Patients who underwent successful removal of indwelling IVC filters showed improved clinical outcomes compared with those in whom the IVC filter could not be removed.

Surgical Management of Perforated Inferior Vena Cava Filters

Management of complicated indwelling inferior vena cava (IVC) filters has increased due to low retrieval rates. Filter migration and perforation are infrequent complications and require explantation of the filter. We report our recent experience with endovascular retrieval and surgical explantation of IVC filters after caval perforation. This is a retrospective review of patients who had IVC filter explantation between 2014 and 2015. Patient demographics, indication for filter placement, clinical presentation, surgical indication and technique, and outcomes were noted. Five cases of IVC filter removal due to caval perforation were identified. Four patients were female, and the median age was 50. Four IVC filters were of the retrievable type and had an average indwelling time of 4years. One filter was permanent with an indwelling time of 9years. The most common presentation was abdominal pain. Four patients had an open operation: 2 performed via laparotomy and 2 with retroperitoneal exposure of the IVC. One patient required median sternotomy and explantation of device fragments that migrated to the right ventricle. One patient had endovascular retrieval, with filter indwelling time of 0.8years. No mortality occurred related to device removal. All patients had resolution of pain at their postoperative visit. Patients presenting with abdominal pain and history of IVC filter placement should cause concern for possible caval strut perforation. Endovascular retrieval or surgical explantation are required for removal and can be accomplished with minimal risk to the patient.

Cost-benefit analysis of establishing an inferior vena cava filter clinic.

Adverse events associated with retrievable inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) have generated an increased interest in improving IVCF retrieval rates to improve patient safety and quality care. This study aims to demonstrate the cost-benefit of implementing an IVCF clinic to improve patient care in an institution in the United States. An IVCF clinic was established at a single institution in September 2012 and for ten months referring physicians were contacted to facilitate retrieval when appropriate. Additionally, a retrospective review was conducted on filter placements over the eight preclinic months. Cost-benefit analysis was conducted by creating a model, which incorporated the average cost and reimbursement for permanent and retrievable IVCFs. A total of 190 IVCFs (152 retrievable IVCFs and 38 permanent IVCFs) were implanted during the IVCF clinic period. Twenty-nine percent of the retrievable IVCFs were successfully retrieved compared to 10 of 119 retrievable IVCFs placed during the preclinic period (8.4%). Cost-benefit analysis, using the average of the institution's six most common reimbursement schedules, demonstrated an average net financial loss per permanent or retrievable IVCF not removed. However, a net financial gain was realized for each retrievable IVCF removed. The additional hospital cost to maintain the IVCF clinic was offset by removing an additional 3.1 IVCFs per year. An IVCF clinic significantly increases retrieval rates, promotes patient safety, and is economically feasible. Given the adverse event profile of retrievable IVCFs, strategic efforts such as these ultimately can improve quality care for patients with in-dwelling IVCFs.

Catheter directed interventions for inferior vena cava thrombosis.

Inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis, although similar in many aspects to deep venous thrombosis (DVT), has distinct clinical implications, treatments and roles for endovascular management. Etiologies of IVC thrombosis vary from congenital malformations of the IVC to acquired, where indwelling IVC filters have been implicated as a leading cause. With an increasing incidence of IVC thrombosis throughout the United States, clinicians need to be educated on the clinical signs and diagnostic tools available to aid in the diagnosis as well as available treatment options. Untreated IVC thrombus can result in serious morbidity and mortality, both in the acute phase with symptoms related to venous outflow occlusion and embolism, and in the long-term, sequelae of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) related to chronic venous occlusion. This manuscript will discuss the clinical presentation of IVC thrombosis, diagnostic and treatment options, as well as the role of endovascular management.

Laser-Assisted Removal of Embedded Vena Cava Filters: A 5-Year First-in-Human Study

Many patients are subjected to the potential risks and morbidity associated with an indwelling inferior vena cava (IVC) filter when standard methods fail to remove the filter. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the excimer laser sheath technique for removing embedded IVC filters. Over a 5-year period, 251 consecutive patients undergoing laser-assisted filter retrieval were prospectively enrolled. There were 103 men and 148 women (mean, 46 years; range, 15-82 years). Indications for retrieval included symptomatic acute IVC thrombosis, chronic IVC occlusion, and/or pain from filter penetration. Retrieval was also performed to prevent risks from prolonged implantation and potentially to eliminate the need for lifelong anticoagulation. After retrieval failed using three times the standard retrieval force (digitally measured), treatment escalation was attempted using a laser sheath powered by a 308-nm XeCl laser. Success was defined as complete filter detachment and removal from the body. Primary safety outcomes were major procedure-related complications. Laser-assisted retrieval was successful in 249 of 251 patients (99.2%) (95%CI, 97.2%-99.9%), with a mean implantation of 979days, range: 37-7,098days (> 19 years), among retrievable-type filters (n= 211) and permanent-type filters (n= 40). Average force during failed attempts without laser was 6.7 vs3.8 lbs during laser-assisted retrievals (P< .0001). The major complication rate was 1.6%(95%CI, 0.4%-4.0%), and all were successfully treated. Successful retrieval allowed cessation of anticoagulation in 45 of 46 patients (98%) (95%CI, 88%-99%) and alleviated filter-related morbidity in 55 of 57 patients (96%) (95%CI, 88%-99%). The excimer laser sheath technique is safe and effective for removing embedded IVC filters refractory to standard retrieval and high force. This technique can be used to alleviate or prevent filter-related morbidity and may allow cessation of filter-related anticoagulation. ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01158482; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Anticoagulation Is Associated with Decreased Inferior Vena Cava Filter-Related Complications in Patients with Metastatic Carcinoma

ObjectivesPatients with metastatic carcinoma and venous thromboembolism commonly have contraindications to anticoagulation that prompt the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. The aim of this study was to compare the pattern of inferior vena cava filter use, anticoagulation management, and development of inferior vena cava filter-related complications in patients with localized versus metastatic carcinoma. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of inferior vena cava filter use at a tertiary referral hospital between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2011. Including only patients with cancer and carcinomas, both metastatic and localized, we recorded the indications for inferior vena cava filter, postfilter practices including anticoagulation use, filter retrieval rates, and filter-related complications. ResultsOverall, 154 patients with carcinoma underwent inferior vena cava filter placement. Basic demographics and indication for filter placement were similar between the metastatic and localized groups. Metastatic patients had more filter-related complications (25% vs 11%, P = .03) and underwent filter retrieval less often (31% vs 58%, P = .01). Time to reinitiating anticoagulation was longer in metastatic patients (5.5 vs 2 days, P = .05). In multivariate analysis, metastatic disease was associated with reduced inferior vena cava filter retrieval (odds ratio, 0.3; P = .003). Anticoagulation use was associated with a lower rate of filter-related complications (odds ratio, 0.3; P = .005). ConclusionsPatients with metastatic carcinoma with an indwelling inferior vena cava filter had a higher rate of filter-related complications, a lower filter retrieval rate, and a greater median time to initiating anticoagulation. When possible, early reinitiation of anticoagulation may reduce inferior vena cava filter-related complications.

Evidence-Based Evaluation of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Complications Based on Filter Type.

Many inferior vena cava (IVC) filter types, along with their specific risks and complications, are not recognized. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the various FDA-approved IVC filter types to determine device-specific risks, as a way to help identify patients who may benefit from ongoing follow-up versus prompt filter retrieval. An evidence-based electronic search (FDA Premarket Notification, MEDLINE, FDA MAUDE) was performed to identify all IVC filter types and device-specific complications from 1980 to 2014. Twenty-three IVC filter types (14 retrievable, 9 permanent) were identified. The devices were categorized as follows: conical (n = 14), conical with umbrella (n = 1), conical with cylindrical element (n = 2), biconical with cylindrical element (n = 2), helical (n = 1), spiral (n = 1), and complex (n = 1). Purely conical filters were associated with the highest reported risks of penetration (90-100%). Filters with cylindrical or umbrella elements were associated with the highest reported risk of IVC thrombosis (30-50%). Conical Bard filters were associated with the highest reported risks of fracture (40%). The various FDA-approved IVC filter types were evaluated for device-specific complications based on best current evidence. This information can be used to guide and optimize clinical management in patients with indwelling IVC filters.

Creation of an iOS and Android Mobile Application for Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filters: A Powerful Tool to Optimize Care of Patients with IVC Filters.

Owing to a myriad of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter types and their potential complications, rapid and correct identification may be challenging when encountered on routine imaging. The authors aimed to develop an interactive mobile application that allows recognition of all IVC filters and related complications, to optimize the care of patients with indwelling IVC filters. The FDA Premarket Notification Database was queried from 1980 to 2014 to identify all IVC filter types in the United States. An electronic search was then performed on MEDLINE and the FDA MAUDE database to identify all reported complications associated with each device. High-resolution photos were taken of each filter type and corresponding computed tomographic and fluoroscopic images were obtained from an institutional review board-approved IVC filter registry. A wireframe and storyboard were created, and software was developed using HTML5/CSS compliant code. The software was deployed using PhoneGap (Adobe, San Jose, CA), and the prototype was tested and refined. Twenty-three IVC filter types were identified for inclusion. Safety data from FDA MAUDE and 72 relevant peer-reviewed studies were acquired, and complication rates for each filter type were highlighted in the application. Digital photos, fluoroscopic images, and CT DICOM files were seamlessly incorporated. All data were succinctly organized electronically, and the software was successfully deployed into Android (Google, Mountain View, CA) and iOS (Apple, Cupertino, CA) platforms. A powerful electronic mobile application was successfully created to allow rapid identification of all IVC filter types and related complications. This application may be used to optimize the care of patients with IVC filters.

Erosion of inferior vena caval filter noted during robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) filters are mechanical devices implanted to provide prophylaxis against pulmonary emboli in patients for whom standard anticoagulation is either inadequate or contraindicated. A 67-year-old female with a 10-year-old indwelling IVC filter underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for a right upper pole renal mass. Renal hilum dissection was complicated by adhesions secondary to eroded IVC filter struts. IVC filter erosion is a well-described phoenomena in both the radiologic and surgical literature. As many as 25% of filters are noted to be radiographically eroded; however, the incidence of clinically significant erosion is much less. Given the placement of endovascularly delivered IVC filters in close proximity to many urologic operative fields, it is important for urologists to be aware of the potential of eroded devices when pursuing para-caval dissections.

Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filter and Catheter Directed Thrombolysis (CDT) for Treating a 19-year-old Man with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Complicated by Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT): A Case Report

Here, we report a case of a 19-year-old man with acute myeloid leukemia complicated by deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in which we placed a retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter during catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT). We were able to retrieve the IVC filter after a successful CDT and concluded that the use of this filter might be efficacious and better than an indwelling IVC filter that is associated with long-term risks. A retrievable filter and CDT should be considered in patients who are at transient risk for phlebemphraxis and require placement of a filter.