Abstract Background Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) pose a great risk of morbidity and mortality to our older population. It is estimated that around 20% of patients admitted to hospital receive an indwelling catheter at some point. Each day that a catheter is in situ increases the risk of urinary tract infection by 5 %. Inappropriate placement of catheters in this population poses an unnecessary and significant risk. Many catheters are inserted in the Emergency Department in older patients, and we wanted to find out if these urinary catheters were inserted in accordance with best practice guidelines. Methods An audit was conducted to look at indwelling catheter use in a cohort of patients over 75 years of age who presented to the Emergency Department of a tertiary hospital over a two-week period in November 2023. Using the software Symphony patient records and Emergency Department physician notes were accessed to look at the following: age, whether catheter insertion was consistent with current best practice evidence, whether the indication for catheter insertion was documented and whether the catheter was removed while in the emergency department. Patients who had long term catheters were also included. Results We included 22 patients in this audit (n=22)- median age was 81 (range 75-90); 11 were male (50%) and 20 had urinary catheterisation consistent with best practice guidelines (91%). 8 patients had clear documentation of indication for the catheter (36%), while no patients had their catheter removed whilst in the emergency department (0%). Conclusion The vast majority of patients had an appropriate indication for urinary catheterisation however clear documentation of a physician order for the urinary catheter was lacking in over half of the cases. A guideline was created showing clear indications for urinary catheterisation in this population and an education session with medical and nursing staff is planned prior to re-auditing.
Read full abstract