Induces Centrosome Amplification Research Articles

MicroRNA‑155‑5p inhibits trophoblast cell proliferation and invasion by disrupting centrosomal function.

Recurrent miscarriage is used to refer to more than three pregnancy failures before 20 weeks of gestation. Defective trophoblast cell growth and invasion are frequently observed in recurrent miscarriage. Several microRNAs (miRs), including miR‑155‑5p, are aberrantly upregulated in recurrent miscarriage; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. The centrosome orchestrates microtubule networks and coordinates cell cycle progression. In addition, it is a base for primary cilia, which are antenna‑like organelles that coordinate signaling during development and growth. Thus, deficiencies in centrosomal functions can lead to several disease, such as breast cancer and microcephaly. In the present study, the signaling cascades were analyzed by western blotting, and the centrosome and primary cilia were observed and analyzed by immunofluorescence staining. The results showed that overexpression of miR‑155‑5p induced centrosome amplification and blocked primary cilia formation in trophoblast cells. Notably, centrosome amplification inhibited trophoblast cell growth by upregulating apoptotic cleaved‑caspase 3 and cleaved‑poly (ADP‑ribose) polymerase in miR‑155‑5p‑overexpressing trophoblast cells. In addition, overexpression of miR‑155‑5p inhibited primary cilia formation, thereby inhibiting epithelial‑mesenchymal transition and trophoblast cell invasion. All phenotypes could be rescued when cells were co‑transfected with the miR‑155‑5p inhibitor, thus supporting the role of miR‑155‑5p in centrosomal functions. It was also found that miR‑155‑5p activated autophagy, whereas disruption of autophagy via the depletion of autophagy‑related 16‑like 1 alleviated miR‑155‑5p‑induced apoptosis and restored trophoblast cell invasion. In conclusion, the present study indicated a novel role of miR‑55‑5p in mediating centrosomal function in recurrent miscarriage.

Centrosome amplification and aneuploidy driven by the HIV-1-induced Vpr•VprBP•Plk4 complex in CD4+ T cells

HIV-1 infection elevates the risk of developing various cancers, including T-cell lymphoma. Whether HIV-1-encoded proteins directly contribute to oncogenesis remains unknown. We observe that approximately 1–5% of CD4+ T cells from the blood of people living with HIV-1 exhibit over-duplicated centrioles, suggesting that centrosome amplification underlies the development of HIV-1-associated cancers by driving aneuploidy. Through affinity purification, biochemical, and cellular analyses, we discover that Vpr, an accessory protein of HIV-1, hijacks the centriole duplication machinery and induces centrosome amplification and aneuploidy. Mechanistically, Vpr forms a cooperative ternary complex with an E3 ligase subunit, VprBP, and polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4). Unexpectedly, however, the complex enhances Plk4’s functionality by promoting its relocalization to the procentriole assembly and induces centrosome amplification. Loss of either Vpr’s C-terminal 17 residues or VprBP acidic region, the two elements required for binding to Plk4 cryptic polo-box, abrogates Vpr’s capacity to induce these events. Furthermore, HIV-1 WT, but not its Vpr mutant, induces multiple centrosomes and aneuploidy in human primary CD4+ T cells. We propose that the Vpr•VprBP•Plk4 complex serves as a molecular link that connects HIV-1 infection to oncogenesis and that inhibiting the Vpr C-terminal motif may reduce the occurrence of HIV-1-associated cancers.

Prolonged overexpression of PLK4 leads to formation of centriole rosette clusters that are connected via canonical centrosome linker proteins

Centrosome amplification is a hallmark of cancer and PLK4 is one of the responsible factors for cancer associated centrosome amplification. Increased PLK4 levels was also shown to contribute to generation of cells with centriole amplification in mammalian tissues as olfactory neuron progenitor cells. PLK4 overexpression generates centriole rosette (CR) structures which harbor more than two centrioles each. Long term PLK4 overexpression results with centrosome amplification, but the maturation of amplified centrioles in CRs and linking of PLK4 induced amplified centrosomes has not yet been investigated in detail. Here, we show evidence for generation of large clustered centrosomes which have more than 2 centriole rosettes and define these structures as centriole rosette clusters (CRCs) in cells that have high PLK4 levels for 2 consecutive cell cycles. In addition, we show that PLK4 induced CRs follow normal centrosomal maturation processes and generate CRC structures that are inter-connected with canonical centrosomal linker proteins as C-Nap1, Rootletin and Cep68 in the second cell cycle after PLK4 induction. Increased PLK4 levels in cells with C-Nap1 and Rootletin knock-out resulted with distanced CRs and CRCs in interphase, while Nek2 knock-out inhibited separation of CRCs in prometaphase, providing functional evidence for the binding of CRC structures with centrosomal linker proteins. Taken together, these results suggest a cell cycle dependent model for PLK4 induced centrosome amplification which occurs in 2 consecutive cell cycles: (i) CR state in the first cell cycle, and (ii) CRC state in the second cell cycle.

Elucidating Differences in Early-Stage Centrosome Amplification in Primary and Immortalized Mouse Cells.

The centrosome is involved in cytoplasmic microtubule organization during interphase and in mitotic spindle assembly during cell division. Centrosome amplification (abnormal proliferation of centrosome number) has been observed in several types of cancer and in precancerous conditions. Therefore, it is important to elucidate the mechanism of centrosome amplification in order to understand the early stage of carcinogenesis. Primary cells could be used to better understand the early stage of carcinogenesis rather than immortalized cells, which tend to have various genetic and epigenetic changes. Previously, we demonstrated that a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, 3-aminobenzamide (3AB), which is known to be nontoxic and nonmutagenic, could induce centrosome amplification and chromosomal aneuploidy in CHO-K1 cells. In this study, we compared primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) and immortalized MEF using 3AB. Although centrosome amplification was induced with 3AB treatment in immortalized MEF, a more potent PARP inhibitor, AG14361, was required for primary MEF. However, after centrosome amplification, neither 3AB in immortalized MEF nor AG14361 in primary MEF caused chromosomal aneuploidy, suggesting that further genetic and/or epigenetic change(s) are required to exhibit aneuploidy. The DNA-damaging agents doxorubicin and γ-irradiation can cause cancer and centrosome amplification in experimental animals. Although doxorubicin and γ-irradiation induced centrosome amplification and led to decreased p27Kip protein levels in immortalized MEF and primary MEF, the phosphorylation ratio of nucleophosmin (Thr199) increased in immortalized MEF, whereas it decreased in primary MEF. These results suggest that there exists a yet unidentified pathway, different from the nucleophosmin phosphorylation pathway, which can cause centrosome amplification in primary MEF.

Mitotic Errors Increase Radiation Sensitivity in Multiple Cancer Cell Types and in Laryngeal Cancer Patients

Chromosomal instability (CIN) arises from continual mitotic errors over the course of multiple cell divisions and is common in cancer. When CIN is increased beyond a maximally tolerated threshold it leads to cell death due to loss of both copies of one or more essential chromosomes. Combining two independent insults that each cause tolerable levels of CIN results in high CIN, cell death and tumor suppression. Because radiation causes CIN, we hypothesize that pre-existing CIN sensitizes tumor cells to radiation therapy. We characterized CIN in 4 HPV+ and 4 HPV- head and neck (HNC), 4 cervical, and 2 breast cancer cell lines before and 24 hours after 2 Gy of radiation. CIN was quantified by scoring lagging, bridge, and misaligned chromosomes, centrosome amplification, and multipolar spindles using immunofluorescence microscopy. To test our hypothesis, we created isogenic CIN and non-CIN HeLa and FaDu cells by knocking down the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad1, which induces lagging chromosomes, and by using MCF10A cells expressing tet-inducible polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) to induce centrosome amplification. Clonogenic assays and murine tumor growth curves were used to determine radiation sensitivity in vitro and in vivo respectively. 6-chromosome FISH was used to quantify CIN and test if it was associated with local recurrence (LR) in a cohort of 29 laryngeal cancer patients treated with definitive (chemo)radiation. Significant differences were determined using a two-tailed student's t-test or Fisher's exact test. A total of 2 Gy of radiation significantly increased lagging, bridge, and misaligned chromosomes and induced centrosome amplification in all cancer cell types in vitro and in vivo. Most abnormal chromosomes after radiation were acentric fragments, which are known to missegregate. Mad1 knockdown in HeLa and FaDu cells increased CIN and led to significantly increased radiation sensitivity compared to their wild-type counterparts. PLK4 overexpression in MCF10A cells led to centrosome amplification and multipolar spindles, which also increased radiation sensitivity. Additionally, mitotic errors were significantly correlated with radiation response in both HPV+ and HPV- patient derived xenograft (PDX) HNC tumors. Finally, patients with laryngeal tumors with CIN below the median of the cohort had a 31% rate of LR after therapy, while tumors with CIN greater than or equal to the median had a LR rate of only 6%. Cancer cells with higher CIN are more sensitive to radiation therapy in vitro and in vivo. This was true for different types of mitotic errors and in different cancer models implying this is likely tumor type agnostic. Importantly, laryngeal tumors with higher baseline levels of CIN had an improved response to definitive radiation therapy, implying increased radiation sensitivity. These studies have potential implications for personalization of radiation dose.

The Chlamydia trachomatis type III-secreted effector protein CteG induces centrosome amplification through interactions with centrin-2

The centrosome is the main microtubule organizing center of the cell and is crucial for mitotic spindle assembly, chromosome segregation, and cell division. Centrosome duplication is tightly controlled, yet several pathogens, most notably oncogenic viruses, perturb this process leading to increased centrosome numbers. Infection by the obligate intracellular bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis (C.t.) correlates with blocked cytokinesis, supernumerary centrosomes, and multipolar spindles; however, the mechanisms behind how C.t. induces these cellular abnormalities remain largely unknown. Here we show that the secreted effector protein, CteG, binds to centrin-2 (CETN2), a key structural component of centrosomes and regulator of centriole duplication. Our data indicate that both CteG and CETN2 are necessary for infection-induced centrosome amplification, in a manner that requires the C-terminus of CteG. Strikingly, CteG is important for invivo infection and growth in primary cervical cells but is dispensable for growth in immortalized cells, highlighting the importance of this effector protein to chlamydial infection. These findings begin to provide mechanistic insight into how C.t. induces cellular abnormalities during infection, but also indicate that obligate intracellular bacteria may contribute to cellular transformation events. Centrosome amplification mediated by CteG-CETN2 interactions may explain why chlamydial infection leads to an increased risk of cervical or ovarian cancer.

Cigarette smoke condensate induces centrosome clustering in normal lung epithelial cells.

Unlike normal cells, cancer cells frequently have multiple centrosomes that can cluster to form bipolar mitotic spindles and allow for successful cell division. Inhibiting centrosome clustering, therefore, holds therapeutic promise to promote cancer cell-specific cell death. We used confocal microscopy, real-time PCR, siRNA knockdown, and western blot to analyze centrosome clustering and declustering using normal lung bronchial epithelial and nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. Also, we used Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software to identify novel pathways associated with centrosome clustering. In this study, we found that exposure to cigarette smoke condensate induces centrosome amplification and clustering in human lung epithelial cells. We observed a similar increase in centrosome amplification and clustering in unexposed NSCLC cell lines which may suggest a common underlying mechanism for lung carcinogenesis. We identified a cyclin D2-mediated centrosome clustering pathway that involves a sonic hedgehog-forkhead box protein M1 axis which is critical for mitosis. We also observed that cyclin D2 knockdown induced multipolar mitotic spindles that could eventually lead to cell death. Here we report a novel role of cyclin D2 in the regulation of centrosome clustering, which could allow the identification of tumors sensitive to cyclin D2 inhibitors. Our data reveal a pathway that can be targeted to inhibit centrosome clustering by interfering with the expression of cyclin D2-associated genes.

RAD6 inhibition enhances paclitaxel sensitivity of triple negative breast cancer cells by aggravating mitotic spindle damage

BackgroundPaclitaxel (PTX), a first-line therapy for triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) induces anti-tumor activity by microtubule stabilization and inhibition of cell division. Its dose-limiting toxicity and short half-life, however, pose clinical challenges underscoring the need for strategies that increase its efficiency. RAD6, a E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme, is associated with centrosomes at all phases of cell cycle. Constitutive overexpression of the RAD6B homolog in normal breast cells induces centrosome amplification and multipolar spindle formation, indicating its importance in centrosome regulation.MethodsTNBC centrosome numbers were scored by pericentrin immunostaining. PTX sensitivities and interactions with SMI#9, a RAD6-selective small molecule inhibitor, on TNBC cell survival were analyzed by MTT and colony forming assays and an isogenic MDA-MB-468 TNBC model of PTX resistance. The molecular mechanisms underlying PTX and SMI#9 induced cytotoxicity were determined by flow cytometry, immunoblot analysis of cyclin B1 and microtubule associated protein TAU, and dual immunofluorescence staining of TAU and α-tubulin.ResultsOur data show aberrant centrosome numbers and that PTX sensitivities are not correlated with TNBC BRCA1 status. Combining PTX with SMI#9 synergistically enhances PTX sensitivities of BRCA1 wild-type and mutant TNBC cells. Whereas SMI#9/PTX combination treatment increased cyclin B1 levels in MDA-MB-468 cells, it induced cyclin B1 loss in HCC1937 cells with accumulation of reproductively dead giant cells, a characteristic of mitotic catastrophe. Cell cycle analysis revealed drug-induced accumulation of tetraploid cells in S and G2/M phases, and robust increases in cells with 4 N DNA content in HCC1937 cells. TAU overexpression is associated with reduced PTX efficacy. Among the six TAU isoforms, both SMI#9 and PTX downregulated 1N3R TAU in MDA-MB-468 and HCC1937 cells, suggesting a common mechanism of 1N3R regulation. Dual TAU and α-tubulin immunostaining showed that SMI#9 induces monopolar mitotic spindles. Using the isogenic model of PTX resistance, we show that SMI#9 treatment restores PTX sensitivity.ConclusionsThese data support a common mechanism of microtubule regulation by SMI#9 and PTX and suggest that combining PTX with RAD6 inhibitor may be beneficial for increasing TNBC sensitivities to PTX and alleviating toxicity. This study demonstrates a new role for RAD6 in regulating microtubule dynamics.

BRCA1 transports the DNA damage signal for CDDP-induced centrosome amplification through the centrosomal Aurora A.

Breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA1) plays roles in DNA repair and centrosome regulation and is involved in DNA damage-induced centrosome amplification (DDICA). Here, the centrosomal localization of BRCA1 and the kinases involved in centrosome duplication were analyzed in each cell cycle phase after treatment with DNA crosslinker cisplatin (CDDP). CDDP treatment increased the centrosomal localization of BRCA1 in early S-G2 phase. BRCA1 contributed to the increased centrosomal localization of Aurora A in S phase and that of phosphorylated Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) in late S phase after CDDP treatment, resulting in centriole disengagement and overduplication. The increased centrosomal localization of BRCA1 and Aurora A induced by CDDP treatment involved the nuclear export of BRCA1 and BRCA1 phosphorylation by ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM). Patient-derived variants and mutations at phosphorylated residues of BRCA1 suppressed the interaction between BRCA1 and Aurora A, as well as the CDDP-induced increase in the centrosomal localization of BRCA1 and Aurora A. These results suggest that CDDP induces the phosphorylation of BRCA1 by ATM in the nucleus and its transport to the cytoplasm, thereby promoting the centrosomal localization Aurora A, which phosphorylates PLK1. The function of BRCA1 in the translocation of the DNA damage signal from the nucleus to the centrosome to induce centrosome amplification after CDDP treatment might support its role as a tumor suppressor.

Hexavalent chromium induces centrosome amplification through ROS-ATF6-PLK4 pathway in colon cancer cells.

Centrosome amplification (CA) refers to a numerical increase in centrosomes resulting in cells with more than two centrosomes. CA has been shown to initiate tumorigenesis and increase the invasive potential of cancer cells in genetically modified experimental models. Hexavalent chromium is a recognized carcinogen that causes CA and tumorigenesis as well as promotes cancer metastasis. Thus, CA appears to be a biological link between chromium and cancer. In the present study, we investigated how chromium triggers CA. Our results showed that a subtoxic concentration of chromium-induced CA in HCT116 colon cancer cells, resulted in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), activated ATF6 without causing endoplasmic reticulum stress, and upregulated the protein level of PLK4. Inhibition of ROS production, ATF6 activation, or PLK4 upregulation attenuated CA. Inhibition of ROS using N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) inhibited chromium-induced activation of ATF6 and upregulation of PLK4. ATF6-specific siRNA knocked down the protein level and activation of ATF6, and upregulated PLK4, with no effect on ROS production. Knockdown of PLK4 protein had no effect on chromium-induced ROS production or activation of ATF6. In conclusion, our results suggest that hexavalent chromium induces CA via the ROS-ATF6-PLK4 pathway and provides molecular targets for inhibiting chromium-mediated CA, which may be useful for the assessment of CA in chromium-promoted tumorigenesis and cancer cell metastasis.

PARP Inhibitor Decreases Akt Phosphorylation and Induces Centrosome Amplification and Chromosomal Aneuploidy in CHO-K1 Cells

Cancer cells are known to have chromosomal number abnormalities (aneuploidy), a hallmark of malignant tumors. Cancer cells also have an increased number of centrosomes (centrosome amplification). Paradoxically, cancer therapies, including γ-irradiation and some anticancer drugs, are carcinogenic and can induce centrosome amplification and chromosomal aneuploidy. Thus, the processes of carcinogenesis and killing cancer cells might have some mechanisms in common. Previously, we found that the inhibitors of polyADP-ribosylation, a post-translational modification of proteins, caused centrosome amplification. However, the mechanism of action of the inhibitors of polyADP-ribosylation is not fully understood. In this study, we found that an inhibitor of polyADP-ribosylation, 3-aminobenzamide, caused centrosome amplification, as well as aneuploidy of chromosomes in CHO-K1 cells. Moreover, inhibitors of polyADP-ribosylation inhibited AKT phosphorylation, and inhibitors of AKT phosphorylation inhibited polyADP-ribosylation, suggesting the involvement of polyADP-ribosylation in the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway for controlling cell proliferation. Our data suggest a possibility for developing drugs that induce centrosome amplification and aneuploidy for therapeutic applications to clinical cancer.

Chlamydia and HPV induce centrosome amplification in the host cell through additive mechanisms.

Based on epidemiology studies, Chlamydia trachomatis has been proposed as a co-factor for human papillomavirus (HPV) in the development of cervical cancer. These two intracellular pathogens have been independently reported to induce the production of extra centrosomes, or centrosome amplification, which is a hallmark of cancer cells. We developed a cell culture model to systematically measure the individual and combined effects of Chlamydia and HPV on the centrosome in the same host cell. We found that C. trachomatis caused centrosome amplification in a greater proportion of cells than HPV and that the effects of the two pathogens on the centrosome were additive. Furthermore, centrosome amplification induced by Chlamydia, but not by HPV, strongly correlated with multinucleation and required progression through mitosis. Our results suggest that C. trachomatis and HPV induce centrosome amplification through different mechanisms, with the chlamydial effect being largely due to a failure in cytokinesis that also results in multinucleation. Our findings provide support for C. trachomatis as a co-factor for HPV in carcinogenesis and offer mechanistic insights into how two infectious agents may cooperate to promote cancer. TAKE AWAYS: • Chlamydia and HPV induce centrosome amplification in an additive manner. • Chlamydia-induced centrosome amplification is linked to host cell multinucleation. • Chlamydia-induced centrosome amplification requires cell cycle progression. • Chlamydia and HPV cause centrosome amplification through different mechanisms. • This study supports Chlamydia as a co-factor for HPV in carcinogenesis.

Binding between ROCK1 and DCTN2 triggers diabetes‑associated centrosome amplification in colon cancer cells.

Type 2 diabetes increases the risk various types of cancer and is associated with a poor prognosis therein. There is also evidence that the disease is associated with cancer metastasis. Centrosome amplification can initiate tumorigenesis with metastasis in vivo and increase the invasiveness of cancer cells in vitro. Our previous study reported that type 2 diabetes promotes centrosome amplification via the upregulation and centrosomal translocation of Rho-associated protein kinase 1 (ROCK1), which suggests that centrosome amplification is a candidate biological link between type 2 diabetes and cancer development. In the present study, functional proteomics analysis was used to further investigate the molecular pathways underlying centrosome amplification by targeting ROCK1 binding partners. High glucose, insulin and palmitic acid were used to induce centrosome amplification, and immunofluorescent staining was employed to visualize centrosomal alterations. Combined with immunoprecipitation, mass spectrometry-based proteomics analysis was used to identify ROCK1 binding proteins, and protein complex disruption was achieved by siRNA-knockdown. In total, 1,148 ROCK1 binding proteins were identified, among which 106 proteins were exclusively associated with the treated samples, 193 were only associated with the control samples, and 849 were found in both the control and treated samples. Of the proteins with evidence of centrosomal localization, Dynactin subunit 2 (DCTN2) was confirmed to be localized to the centrosomes. Treating the cells with high glucose, insulin and palmitic acid increased the protein levels of ROCK1 and DCTN2, promoted their binding with each other, and triggered centrosome amplification. Disruption of the protein complex by knocking down ROCK1 or DCTN2 expression partially attenuated centrosome amplification, while simultaneous knockdown of both proteins completely inhibited centrosome amplification. These results suggested ROCK1-DCTN2 binding as a signal for the regulation of centrosome homeostasis, which is key for diabetes-associated centrosome amplification, and enriches our knowledge of centrosome biology. Therefore, the ROCK1-DCTN2 complex may serve as a target for inhibiting centrosome amplification both in research or future therapeutic development.

Hexavalent chromium induces amplification via ROS‐TF6‐PLK4 pathway

Hexavalent chromium is classified as one of the group one carcinogens in 2012 by the IARC. Accumulated evidence indicates that centrosome amplification is sufficient to initiation tumorigenesis. Since chromium can cause centrosome amplification, it is logical to suspect that chromium causes tumorigenesis via centrosome amplification. The present study investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying chromium-elicited centrosome amplification using non-cancerous lung cells as an experimental model. We found that hexavalent chromium K2Cr2O7 was sub-toxic the cells at the concentration of 0.5 µM or below. At the sub-toxic concentrations, it induced centrosome amplification significantly. Treatment of the cells by chromium increased the intracellular level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), activated ATF-6, and increased the protein level of PLK4. Antioxidant N-acetylcysteine was able to inhibit the chromium-triggered ROS, ATF-6 activation, increment in PLK expression and centrosome amplification. Knockdown of ATF-6 inhibited the production of AFT6 active fragment, the PLK4 expression and centrosome amplification by chromium, without affecting the chromium-produced ROS. Knockdown of PLK4 inhibited the centrosome amplification, but did not modify the ROS production and AFT6 activation. In conclusion, our results suggest that the hexavalent chromium evokes centrosome amplification via ROS-ATF-6-PLK4 signaling pathways. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the chromium-induced centrosome amplification is helpful for the assessment of centrosome amplification in the chromium-caused tumorigenesis.

Genotoxic stress-activated DNA-PK-p53 cascade and autophagy cooperatively induce ciliogenesis to maintain the DNA damage response

The DNA-PK maintains cell survival when DNA damage occurs. In addition, aberrant activation of the DNA-PK induces centrosome amplification, suggesting additional roles for this kinase. Here, we showed that the DNA-PK-p53 cascade induced primary cilia formation (ciliogenesis), thus maintaining the DNA damage response under genotoxic stress. Treatment with genotoxic drugs (etoposide, neocarzinostatin, hydroxyurea, or cisplatin) led to ciliogenesis in human retina (RPE1), trophoblast (HTR8), lung (A459), and mouse Leydig progenitor (TM3) cell lines. Upon genotoxic stress, several DNA damage signaling were activated, but only the DNA-PK-p53 cascade contributed to ciliogenesis, as pharmacological inhibition or genetic depletion of this pathway decreased genotoxic stress-induced ciliogenesis. Interestingly, in addition to localizing to the nucleus, activated DNA-PK localized to the base of the primary cilium (mother centriole) and daughter centriole. Genotoxic stress also induced autophagy. Inhibition of autophagy initiation or lysosomal degradation or depletion of ATG7 decreased genotoxic stress-induced ciliogenesis. Besides, inhibition of ciliogenesis by depletion of IFT88 or CEP164 attenuated the genotoxic stress-induced DNA damage response. Thus, our study uncovered the interplay among genotoxic stress, the primary cilium, and the DNA damage response.

Abstract 3560: PLK4 is a HIF-1α target gene: A novel mechanism inducing centrosome amplification in tumor cells

Abstract Background: The presence of supernumerary or abnormally large centrosomes, also known as centrosome amplification (CA), drives tumor progression by enhancing chromosomal instability, and altering cellular microtubule cytoskeletons and tissue cytoarchitectures to promote the migration and invasion capabilities of cancer cells. Although the prevalence of CA is documented in a variety of cancer types, it remains unclear how CA is induced in tumor cells.This study aims to examine the role of intratumoral hypoxia in inducing CA via HIF-1α. Methods: We (a) exposed cultured breast, pancreatic, colorectal and prostate cancer cells to hypoxia, and (b) genetically manipulated hypoxia [via overexpression (OE) or knock-out (KO) of HIF-1α], and quantitated CA employing immunocytofluorescence methods. We also quantitated the levels of CA-associated genes and proteins by qRT-PCR and western blot, respectively. Next, to discern the biological pathway through which HIF-1α induces CA, we performed ChIP and Luciferase reporter assays. We immunohistochemically labeled breast (n=24), colon (38), prostate (n=52), and pancreatic (n=34) cancer tissue samples for HIF-1α and PLK4. Serial sections from the same tumors were also immunofluorescently labeled for γ-tubulin and CA was quantitated. Using public microarray datasets (TCGA), we investigated whether centrosomal gene expression is enriched in tumors characterized by a high expression of a hypoxia gene expression signature. Results: Cells cultured in hypoxic conditions exhibited higher CA (p<0.05) than the cells cultured in normoxic conditions. CA levels increased when cells with HIF-1α OE were cultured in normoxic conditions and no significant induction of CA was observed when the HIF-1α KO cells were cultured under hypoxic conditions. ChIP and Luciferase assay confirmed that HIF-1α induced CA by directly upregulating the expression of PLK4. Moreover, when tumor cells were exposed to hypoxia after knock-down of PLK4, no significant changes in CA and CA-associated proteins were observed. In clinical patient samples (breast, colon, pancreatic and prostate cancer), we observed that HIF-1α expression was significantly (p<0.05) correlated with PLK4 expression at the protein level (breast ρ=0.81, colon ρ=0.76, prostate ρ=0.68, and pancreatic ρ=0.67). Findings from our in silico analyses further validated these observations by showing a strong correlation between the expressions of HIF-1α and PLK4 at the transcriptional level. We also found that centrosomal gene expression is enriched in tumors with high hypoxia score (TCGA dataset of breast, colon, pancreatic and prostate cancer). Conclusion: Collectively, our findings suggest that hypoxia drives CA in tumor cells through HIF-1α-mediated transcriptional upregulation of PLK4. Given the development of several promising HIF-1α inhibitors, this research could potentially aid in patient risk stratification for clinical decision-making, and enable design of new therapies. Citation Format: Karuna Mittal, Jaspreet Kaur, Shaligram Sharma, Ishita Choudhary, Guanhao Wei, Precious Imhansi Jacob, Da Hoon Choi, Nagini Maganti, Shrikant Pawar, Michael S. Toss, Emiel A. Janssen, Meenakshi V. Gupta, Michelle D. Reid, Emad A. Rakha, Padmashree Rida, Ritu Aneja. PLK4 is a HIF-1α target gene: A novel mechanism inducing centrosome amplification in tumor cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3560.

Cordycepin Inhibits Human Gestational Choriocarcinoma Cell Growth by Disrupting Centrosome Homeostasis.

IntroductionHuman gestational choriocarcinoma, a type of gestational trophoblastic disease, occurs after miscarriage, abortion, ectopic pregnancy, or molar pregnancy. Despite recent advances in the mechanism of anticancer drugs that induce human gestational choriocarcinoma apoptosis or block its growth, new therapeutic approaches are needed to be established. Cordycepin is an active anti-cancer component extracted from Cordyceps sinensis. It prevents cell proliferation both in vitro and in vivo.Materials and MethodsHere, we examined cell growth by counting cell numbers, and performing a flow cytometry assay and EdU incorporation assay. Centrosome and cytoskeleton-related structures were observed by immunofluorescence assay. The DNA damage-related signaling was examined by Western blot assay.ResultsHere, we showed that cordycepin inhibited human gestational choriocarcinoma cell proliferation and induced cell death. In addition, treatment with cordycepin activated DNA-PK and ERK, thus inducing centrosome amplification and aberrant mitosis. These amplified centrosomes also disrupted microtubule arrays and actin networks, thus leading to defective cell adhesion. Furthermore, cordycepin induced autophagy for triggering cell death.ConclusionThus, our study demonstrates that cordycepin inhibits cell proliferation and disrupts the cytoskeleton by triggering centrosome amplification.

Secreted Wnt6 mediates diabetes-associated centrosome amplification via its receptor FZD4.

We recently published that type 2 diabetes promotes cell centrosome amplification via upregulation of Rho-associated protein kinase 1 (ROCK1) and 14-3-3 protein-σ (14-3-3σ). This study further investigates the molecular mechanisms underlying diabetes-associated centrosome amplification. We found that treatment of cells with high glucose, insulin, and palmitic acid levels increased the intracellular and extracellular protein levels of Wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 6 (Wnt6) as well as the cellular level of β-catenin. The treatment also activated β-catenin and promoted its nuclear translocation. Treatment of cells with siRNA species for Wnt6, Frizzled-4 (FZD4), or β-catenin as well as introduction of antibodies against Wnt6 or FZD4 to the cell culture medium could all attenuate the treatment-triggered centrosome amplification. Moreover, we showed that secreted Wnt6-FZD4-β-catenin was the signaling pathway that was upstream of ROCK1 and 14-3-3σ. We found that advanced glycation end products (AGEs) were also able to increase the cellular and extracellular levels of Wnt6, the cellular protein level of β-catenin, and centrosome amplification. Treatment of the cells with siRNA species for Wnt6 or FZD4 as well as introduction of antibodies against Wnt6 or FZD4 to the cell culture could all inhibit the AGEs-elicited centrosome amplification. In colon tissues from a diabetic mouse model, the protein levels of Wnt6 and 14-3-3σ were increased. In conclusion, our results showed that the pathophysiological factors in type 2 diabetes, including AGEs, were able to induce centrosome amplification. It is suggested that secreted Wnt6 binds to FZD4 to activate the canonical Wnt6 signaling pathway, which is upstream of ROCK1 and 14-3-3σ, and that this is the cell signaling pathway underlying diabetes-associated centrosome amplification.

POLQ Overexpression Is Associated with an Increased Somatic Mutation Load and PLK4 Overexpression in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

DNA Polymerase Theta (POLQ) is a DNA polymerase involved in error-prone translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) and error-prone repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In the present study, we examined whether abnormal POLQ expression may be involved in the pathogenesis of lung adenocarcinoma (LAC). First, we found overexpression of POLQ at both the mRNA and protein levels in LAC, using data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and by immunohistochemical analysis of our LAC series. POLQ overexpression was associated with an advanced pathologic stage and an increased total number of somatic mutations in LAC. When H1299 human lung cancer cell clones overexpressing POLQ were established and examined, the clones showed resistance to a DSB-inducing chemical in the clonogenic assay and an increased frequency of mutations in the supF forward mutation assay. Further analysis revealed that POLQ overexpression was also positively correlated with Polo Like Kinase 4 (PLK4) overexpression in LAC, and that PLK4 overexpression in the POLQ-overexpressing H1299 cells induced centrosome amplification. Finally, analysis of the TCGA data revealed that POLQ overexpression was associated with an increased somatic mutation load and PLK4 overexpression in diverse human cancers; on the other hand, overexpressions of nine TLS polymerases other than POLQ were associated with an increased somatic mutation load at a much lower frequency. Thus, POLQ overexpression is associated with advanced pathologic stage, increased somatic mutation load, and PLK4 overexpression, the last inducing centrosome amplification, in LAC, suggesting that POLQ overexpression is involved in the pathogenesis of LAC.

BRCA1-Interacting Protein OLA1 Requires Interaction with BARD1 to Regulate Centrosome Number.

BRCA1 functions as a tumor suppressor in DNA repair and centrosome regulation. Previously, Obg-like ATPase 1 (OLA1) was shown to interact with BARD1, a heterodimer partner of BRCA1. OLA1 binds to BRCA1, BARD1, and γ-tubulin and functions in centrosome regulation. This study determined that overexpression of wild-type OLA1 (OLA1-WT) caused centrosome amplification due to centriole overduplication in mammary tissue-derived cells. Centrosome amplification induced by overexpression of the cancer-derived OLA1 mutant, which is deficient at regulating centrosome number, occurred in significantly fewer cells than in that induced by overexpression of OLA1-WT. Thus, it was hypothesized that overexpression of OLA1 with normal function efficiently induces centrosome amplification, but not that of OLA1 mutants, which are deficient at regulating centrosome number. We analyzed whether overexpression of OLA1 missense mutants of nine candidate phosphorylation residues, three residues modified with acetylation, and two ATP-binding residues caused centrosome amplification and identified five missense mutants that are deficient in the regulation of centrosome number. Three of them did not bind to BARD1. Two phosphomimetic mutations restored the binding to BARD1 and the efficient centrosome amplification by their overexpression. Knockdown and overexpression of BARD1 also caused centrosome amplification. BARD1 mutant reported in cancer failed to bind to OLA1 and rescue the BARD1 knockdown-induced centrosome amplification and reduced its centrosomal localization. Combined, these data reveal that the OLA1-BARD1 interaction is important for the regulation of centrosome number.Implications: Regulation of centrosome number by BRCA1/BARD1 together with OLA1 is important for the genome integrity to prevent tumor development. Mol Cancer Res; 16(10); 1499-511. ©2018 AACR.