Individual Surgeon Practice Research Articles

Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Comparison of Opioid Prescription Patterns and Occupational Therapy Referrals.

Endoscopic and open carpal tunnel releases (ECTR and OCTR) are safe and effective operations. We compared the approaches in terms of postoperative opioid refills and occupational therapy (OT) referrals. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) treated with ECTR or OCTR. Patients with isolated idiopathic CTS were included; patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral carpal tunnel release (CTR), revision CTR, and additional procedures at time of CTR were excluded. Outcomes included number of patients requiring an opioid refill and/or an OT referral within 6 months of surgery. A total of 1125 patients met inclusion criteria. Endoscopic release was performed in 634 (56%) cases and open release in 491 (44%). Unadjusted analysis revealed no difference in number of patients requiring refills (6.0% vs 7.1%, P = .44), mean number of refills among those requiring one (1.29 vs 1.23, P = .69), total oral morphine equivalents (45.1 vs 44.7, P = .84), number of patients calling regarding pain (12.8% vs 14.7%, P = .36), OT referrals (12.1% vs 11.4%, P = .71), or average number of OT visits (4.5 vs 4.2, P = .74) for endoscopic and open techniques, respectively. Adjusted analysis revealed lower age, lower body mass index, and history of muscle relaxant as predictors of opioid refills, and in contrast to the unadjusted analysis, operating surgeon and surgical technique were predictors of referral to OT. Endoscopic CTR and OCTR did not differ in terms of unadjusted postoperative patient calls for pain, number of opioid refills, or OT referrals. After correcting for individual surgeon practice, endoscopic was associated with decreased odds of requiring postoperative OT.

Identification of Main Influencers of Surgical Efficiency and Variability Using Task-Level Objective Metrics: A Five-Year Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy Case Series.

ObjectiveSurgical efficiency and variability are critical contributors to optimal outcomes, patient experience, care team experience, and total cost to treat per disease episode. Opportunities remain to develop scalable, objective methods to quantify surgical behaviors that maximize efficiency and reduce variability. Such objective measures can then be used to provide surgeons with timely and user-specific feedbacks to monitor performances and facilitate training and learning. In this study, we used objective task-level analysis to identify dominant contributors toward surgical efficiency and variability across the procedural steps of robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) over a five-year period for a single surgeon. These results enable actionable insights that can both complement those from population level analyses and be tailored to an individual surgeon's practice and experience.MethodsIntraoperative video recordings of 77 RSG procedures performed by a single surgeon from 2015 to 2019 were reviewed and segmented into surgical tasks. Surgeon-initiated events when controlling the robotic-assisted surgical system were used to compute objective metrics. A series of multi-staged regression analysis were used to determine: if any specific tasks or patient body mass index (BMI) statistically impacted procedure duration; which objective metrics impacted critical task efficiency; and which task(s) statistically contributed to procedure variability.ResultsStomach dissection was found to be the most significant contributor to procedure duration (β = 0.344, p< 0.001; R = 0.81, p< 0.001) followed by surgical inactivity and stomach stapling. Patient BMI was not found to be statistically significantly correlated with procedure duration (R = −0.01, p = 0.90). Energy activation rate, a robotic system event-based metric, was identified as a dominant feature in predicting stomach dissection duration and differentiating earlier and later case groups. Reduction of procedure variability was observed between earlier (2015-2016) and later (2017-2019) groups (IQR = 14.20 min vs. 6.79 min). Stomach dissection was found to contribute most to procedure variability (β = 0.74, p < 0.001).ConclusionsA surgical task-based objective analysis was used to identify major contributors to surgical efficiency and variability. We believe this data-driven method will enable clinical teams to quantify surgeon-specific performance and identify actionable opportunities focused on the dominant surgical tasks impacting overall procedure efficiency and consistency.

Parathyroid Imaging Practices for Primary Hyperparathyroidism Without Previous Operations Among Endocrine Surgery Program Directors.

Attempts at preoperative localization of abnormal parathyroid gland(s) in primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) can be performed with a variety of modalities. Study utilization is surgeon-specific with highly variable opinions in parathyroid surgery. As more people are diagnosed with pHPT, the complexity of the disease has given rise to variation in management. This heterogeneity raises the question of the true clinical practice of imaging among individual endocrine surgeons. To better understand the preoperative parathyroid imaging practices of endocrine surgeons, an email-based survey was disseminated to the program directors of 22 American Association of Endocrine Surgeons fellowship programs querying them on their initial diagnostic test of choice for pHPT. Clinical support team members from each respective program were subsequently contacted and answers were compared. Sixty-eight percent (15/22) of clinical team members recommended either an additional (12/15) or different imaging test (3/15) than what was recommended by their institution's endocrine surgeon. The most common initial imaging test that was repeated by both the endocrine surgeon and clinical team member was neck ultrasound; 33% of clinical team members (7/22) responded concordantly to their surgeon with ultrasound as the initial recommendation. Significant variability exists in the preoperative approach to patients with hyperparathyroidism. Here, we demonstrate that inconsistency in preoperative imaging recommendations even extends to within an individual surgeon's practice based on the impact of the clinical support team, highlighting the role for improved clinical protocols within an institution's clinical team.

Discussion of: Individual surgeon practice is the most important factor influencing diverting ileostomy creation for patients undergoing sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis

Discussion of: Individual surgeon practice is the most important factor influencing diverting ileostomy creation for patients undergoing sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis

Individual surgeon practice is the most important factor influencing diverting loop ileostomy creation for patients undergoing sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis

BackgroundTo identify factors associated with diverting ileostomy creation (DLI) in patients undergoing sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease in a high volume colorectal unit and to obtain information for better preoperative patient counseling. MethodsPatients who underwent sigmoid colectomy with colorectal anastomosis with or without DLI for diverticulitis between 01/1994-12/2014 were identified. Preoperative characteristics, surgeon practice year, individual surgeon and postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with DLI or not. Results1320 patients were identified and DLI was created in 204 (15.4%) patients. DLI creation was associated with older age (p < 0.001), female gender (p = 0.01), higher ASA-class (p < 0.001), hypertension (p = 0.01), DM(p < 0.001), renal comorbidities (p < 0.001), preoperative steroid use (p = 0.03), preoperative anemia (p = 0.004), and open surgery (p < 0.001). While ileostomy creation rates did not vary over the years during the study period or with increased surgeons' experience, surgeon identity had significant impact on ileostomy creation (Rate range 6.8–60.7%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that individual surgeon, open approach, preoperative steroid use, and disease-related factors remained independently associated with DLI creation. ConclusionIndividual surgeon's practice affects the rate of diverting ileostomy creation in patients undergoing sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease.

Cost variation in a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the association with outcomes across a single health system: implications for standardization and improved resource utilization

BackgroundPayers and regulatory bodies are increasingly placing emphasis on cost containment, quality/outcome measurement and transparent reporting. Significant cost variation occurs in many operative procedures without a clear relationship with outcomes. Clear cost‐benefit associations will be necessary to justify expenditures in the era of bundled payment structures. MethodsAll laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LCCKs) performed within a single health system over a 1‐year period were analysed for operating room (OR) supply cost. The cost was correlated with American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) outcomes. ResultsFrom July 2013 to June 2014, 2178 LCCKs were performed by 55 surgeons at seven hospitals. The median case OR supply cost was $513 ± 156. There was variation in cost between individual surgeons and within an individual surgeon's practice. There was no correlation between cost and ACS NSQIP outcomes. The majority of cost variation was explained by selection of trocar and clip applier constructs. ConclusionsSignificant case OR cost variation is present in LCCK across a single health system, and there is no clear association between increased cost and NSQIP outcomes. Placed within the larger context of overall cost, the opportunity exists for improved resource utilization with no obvious risk for a reduction in the quality of care.

Comparative inpatient resource utilization for patients undergoing endoscopic or microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary lesions.

OBJECT.: An increasingly important measure in the health care field is utilization of hospital resources, particularly in the context of emerging surgical techniques. Despite the recent widespread adoption of the endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for pituitary lesion surgery, the health care resources utilized with this approach have not been compared with those utilized with the traditional microscopic approach. The purpose of this study was to determine the drivers of resource utilization by comparing hospital charges for patients with pituitary tumors who had undergone either endoscopic or microscopic transsphenoidal surgery. A complete accounting of all hospital charges for 166 patients prospectively enrolled in a surgical quality-of-life study at a single pituitary center during October 2011-June 2013 was undertaken. Patients were assigned to surgical technique group according to surgeon preference and then managed according to a standard postoperative institutional set of orders. Individual line-item charges were assigned to categories (such as pharmacy, imaging, surgical, laboratory, room, pathology, and recovery unit), and univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were conducted. Of the 166 patients, 99 underwent microscopic surgery and 67 underwent endoscopic surgery. Baseline demographic descriptors and tumor characteristics did not differ significantly. Mean total hospital charges were $74,703 ± $15,142 and $72,311 ± $16,576 for microscopic and endoscopic surgery patients, respectively (p = 0.33). Furthermore, other than for pathology, charge categories did not differ significantly between groups. A 2-step multivariate regression model revealed that length of stay was the most influential variable, followed by a diagnosis of Cushing's disease, and then by endoscopic surgical technique. The model accounts for 42% of the variance in hospital charges. Study findings suggest that adoption of the endoscopic transsphenoidal technique for pituitary lesions does not adversely affect utilization of resources for inpatients. The primary drivers of hospital charges, in order of importance, were length of stay, a diagnosis of Cushing's disease, and, to a lesser extent, use of the endoscopic technique. This study also highlights the influence of individual surgeon practice patterns on resource utilization.

Effect of Preoperative Intravenous Methocarbamol and Intravenous Acetaminophen on Opioid Use After Primary Total Hip and Knee Replacement

Between 2010 and 2011, a perioperative pain protocol for primary total hip and knee replacement at one Florida medical center replaced preoperative oral analgesics with intravenous methocarbamol and intravenous acetaminophen. This is a retrospective cohort study of 300 patients, with 150 patients using the new pain protocol and 150 patients using a 2008 pain protocol that did not include these medications. The 2 cohorts were similar in patient gender, age, and body mass index. Opioid consumption was evaluated for a period of 48 hours after incision and was divided into 3 separate time intervals, as well as total 48-hour consumption. Mean opiate use decreased significantly from 2008 to 2011 in all time intervals and total consumption (7.5±3.4 mg to 6.1±3.0 mg; P<.01). Subgroup analysis suggested that changes to the hip protocol were responsible for decreased opioid use in the operating room and the postanesthesia care unit, and changes to the knee protocol were responsible for decreased opioid use on the hospital floor and total consumption. The difference between the 2 protocol groups was not due to differences in individual surgeon practice patterns. Physical therapy progress of knee flexion, average walking distance, and maximum walking distance were significantly improved. Hospital discharge was shorter in the 2011 group (4.0±1.1 days in 2008 group and 3.6±1.0 days in 2011 group). This study shows significant improvement in patient care from 2008 to 2011 that is at least partially due to the change to the use of preoperative intravenous methocarbamol and intravenous acetaminophen.

FILLERS-Q: An Instrument for Assessing Patient Experiences after Treatment with Facial Injectable Soft Tissue Fillers

Patient-reported outcomes data are limited after injectable soft tissue filler treatment. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are becoming integral to medical practices in other specialties and will become so as well in facial plastic surgery. The obvious differences in types of disorders treated and the outcomes of primary importance seen between general medical/surgical and facial plastic surgery practices make institution of standard outcomes studies difficult in facial plastic surgery. However, understanding the patient's experience and satisfaction with treatment is essential to continue to provide excellent care to facial aesthetic patients. This article describes use of a new survey instrument, Facial Injectables: Longevity, Late and Early Reactions and Satisfaction Questionnaire (FILLERS-Q), in assessing patient response to facial injections of soft tissue fillers. FILLERS-Q is a 43-item questionnaire that captures patient demographics (4 items), patient satisfaction with treatment (10 items), procedure-related events (3 to 7 items), impact on relationships (9 to 15 items), and economic considerations related to dermal filler treatment (3 to 7 items). The results provide a "snapshot" of patients treated in an individual surgeon's practice.

Improving the Informed Consent Process for Surgery

Obtaining and documenting informed consent is of vital importance to physicians. We developed a procedure-based consent form that facilitates patient discussion and validated this process by surveying the patient regarding elements of the consent process, using an independent evaluator. One hundred and twenty consecutive outpatients were evaluated before different neurosurgery procedures. The consent form listed specific diagnoses, procedures, alternatives (eight listed), and risks (22 listed), and each point discussed was checked off by the surgeon. Between 10 and 20 minutes later, each element was questioned by one lay-member of the office staff. A group of patients not at risk for cognitive decline were resurveyed months later. One hundred and twenty (100%) of 120 of patients answered correctly regarding their diagnosis and the planned procedure. Four hundred and twenty-eight alternative treatments were discussed, and 420 (98.1%) of the 428 were recalled correctly. Of 1207 risks that were discussed, 1176 (97.4%) were recalled correctly. When a subset of the patients were reevaluated at a mean of 4.5 months later, all 20 patients correctly recalled their procedure and diagnosis. Of 79 alternatives discussed with patients before surgery, 73 (92.4%) were subsequently recalled. Of 217 risks discussed before surgery, 199 (91.7%) were recalled. Although the immediate or delayed recall rates were high (> 90%), there was a reduction in the recall rate over time (alternatives, P = .007; risks, P < 0.0001). A consent process designed for an individual surgeon's practice was validated and showed high rates of patient recall in the postprocedural period. We think that this method to obtain and document informed consent should be considered for use by physicians.

Difficulties with the "N + 7 rule" in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

In an effort to facilitate the use of interference screw fixation in the tibia, a method to orient the tibial tunnel termed the "N + 7 Rule" was prospectively applied to 60 consecutive endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions performed by a single surgeon. Four cases were excluded because a breach in the described protocol for application of the N + 7 rule was identified at the time of the operation. Of the remaining 56 cases, 28 (50%) were fixed with an interference screw on the tibia, whereas 28 (50%) required fixation with sutures tied over a post. The 28 cases not amenable to interference screw fixation included 17 cases in which the tibial tunel was too long and 11 cases in which the tunnel was too short. It appears that the applicability of the N + 7 rule to an individual surgeon's practice may be altered by small variations in operative technique.

Vascular surgeons' resource use at a university hospital related to diagnostic-related group and source of admission.

To determine whether differences in the conduct of individual practices of attending vascular surgeons account for variations in resource use at a university hospital. The practice patterns of six attending vascular surgeons at the University of Michigan Hospital were assessed for patient length of stay (LOS), ancillary service use, and the number of nursing hours required. Included in the study were 1930 hospitalized patients who had one of the 10 most frequently encountered diagnostic related groups (DRGs). Statistical analyses of variables that were thought likely to affect resource use included multiple regression models. Patient age, sex, insurance, source of admission (direct admission or transfer admission), surgeon, and DRG category together accounted for 22% of LOS variation, 27.7% of variation in ancillary service use, and 29.4% of variation in nursing hours. In no model did the individual surgeon's practice significantly effect the LOS, ancillary use, or nursing hours. Patients transferred from other hospitals had increased resource use in all models. The DRG category alone explained 20.9% of the variance in LOS, 25.2% of the variation in ancillary service use, and 21.2% of the variance in nursing hours. Differences in the conduct of individual vascular surgeons' practices accounted for less than 1% variation in hospital resource use. The most important influences on resource use were the DRG category and the source of patient admission. Modification of the frequency and manner of accepting transfer patients to vascular surgery services of a university hospital may have a major impact on hospital resource use.