The article reveals the peculiarities of the formation and development of legal regulation of land relations in Galicia as a part of Austria and Austria-Hungary (1772–1918). It is noted that such legal regulation was carried out on the basis of individual imperial patents, ministerial orders and instructions, and starting from 1861, decisions of the Galician Regional Diet were added to them. A separate complex normative legal act - the land code in the modern sense of the term, which would regulate land relations at the time under study, did not exist in the Habsburg monarchy. Only after the adoption of the Civil Code in 1811, it was possible to unify a number of aspects in the field of legal relations in the land sector. But even in that case, the Civil Code of 1811 actually regulated only what arose from the property rights to a land plot, providing a number of norms, the purpose of which was to protect the rights of noble property. In 1828, a new land cadastre called «definitum» was introduced in Galicia, which operated until the beginning of the Second World War. Another change in the legal regulation of land relations in Galicia took place after the «Spring of Nations» revolution. On June 7, 1883, the Comassation (Combination of Land Plots) Act was passed. The latter, in particular, provided for the right to combine land plots with the participation of representatives of the authorities and in accordance with the current legislation. Austrian civil law recognized land as unlimited property with the right of «use» and «abuse». However, there was a difference in the legal status of individual lands. In particular, the subject who owned the land did not have the right to divide it, pledge it, or even inherit it. At the same time, the court (dominia) did not have the right to divide this land or exchange it for another without government permission. Also, with the permission of the government, the yard could remove an unwanted peasant from the soil, but it was necessary to plant another one in his place. Restrictions on the ownership, tenure or inheritance after the abolition of manor in 1848 became much less, as they were no longer determined by manor relations. After the abolition of the master's power over his subjects and the transformation of the peasants into the subjects of the emperor, the state placed the peasants under the jurisdiction of the public authorities. Urbarial relations were recognized as a sphere of private law civil relations. But even despite the gradual improvement of the legal framework for the regulation of land ownership, land use, lease, pledge or inheritance, vestiges of patrimonial law were preserved and constantly revived in land relations.