Indirect Costs Of Rheumatoid Arthritis Research Articles

Cost of Illness and Out-of-pocket Expenditure of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Rheumatoid Arthritis at a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India Using Conventional Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

Background: The economic burden of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in India is significant. Aim: To estimate the cost of illness (COI) and out-of-pocket expenditure of AS and RA among patients on conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Methodology: A retrospective, cross-sectional study on 87 participants using a prevalence-based, bottom-up approach and the human capital method was adopted to calculate the direct and indirect costs of RA and AS. Results: The average COI for patients with RA was estimated to be ₹51,741 person per year, whereas the COI for patients with AS was ₹41,379 per person per year (Consumer Price Index 2021: 134.44). Direct cost was the major contributor to COI constituting 65.21% [₹33,743] and 58.84% [₹24,348] of the total COI of RA and AS, respectively. Increasing disease severity, longer duration of illness and increasing impairment of daily activities were significantly associated with increasing COI of both RA and AS. The main expense towards annual direct costs per year in patients with RA was medication expenses, whereas for patients with AS, it was investigation expenses. Out-of-pocket spending was significant as nearly half (54.95%) of the direct expenditure on health for both RA [₹18,544] and AS (39.2%) [₹9,544] was borne by patients themselves. RA and AS caused catastrophic health expenditure in 14.92% and 6.67% of households, respectively. Indirect costs of RA and AS were ₹17,998 and ₹17,030, respectively. Indirect costs of RA and AS increased as productivity at work decreased. Average overall work productivity impairment and overall activity impairment reached close to 50% and was comparable for RA and AS. Conclusion: The economic burden of RA and AS is significant. There is an urgent need to prioritise policies and interventions for management of rheumatological conditions.

POS0530 HOW DOES MULTIMORBIDITY IMPACT ON THE DIRECT AND INDIRECT COSTS IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS?

Background:Comorbidities are prevalent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and associated with worse outcomes as well as higher economic burden. Little is known about the impact of multimorbidity on the direct and indirect costs of RA. Evidence of the incremental scale of these multimorbidity costs will usefully inform RA interventions and policies.Objectives:The aim of this study was to describe how multimorbidity impacts on the cost-of-illness, including direct and indirect costs, in patients with RA.Methods:The Scottish Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (SERA) is a registry of patients newly presenting with RA since 2011. It contains data on patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, health-related quality of life, and employment status data. These data were linked to routinely recorded hospital admissions and primary care prescribing data. Direct costs were estimated by applying relevant unit costs to healthcare resource use quantities. Indirect cost estimates were obtained from information on employment status and hospital admissions, valued by age and sex specific wages. Two-part models (probit followed by generalized linear model) were used to estimate direct and indirect costs, adjusting for age, gender, and functional disability. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score was calculated using patient ICD-10 diagnoses from hospital records. The number of comorbidities was categorized into “RA alone”, “single comorbidity” and “multimorbidity (>1 comorbidity)”.Results:Data were available for 1,150 patients, 65.7% were female and a mean age of 57.5±14 years. The majority of patients only had RA (54.1%), followed by a single comorbidity (23.4%) and multimorbidity (22.5%). Annual total costs were significantly higher for patients with multimorbidity (£6,669 95% CI £4,871-£8,466; OR 11.3 95% CI 8.14-15.87) and for patients with a single comorbidity (£2,075 95% CI £1,559-£2,591; OR 3.52 95% CI 2.61-4.79), when compared with RA alone (£590). The excess costs were mainly driven by direct costs (£6,281 versus £1,875 versus £556). Although the difference in indirect costs between patients with multimorbidity and a single comorbidity were not statistically significant (£1,218 versus £914, p=0.11), patients with multimorbidity were associated with significantly higher costs than those with RA only (£594, p<0.01).Conclusion:The presence of comorbidity contributes significant excess to both direct and indirect costs among RA patients. In particular, patients with multimorbidity incurred substantially higher direct costs than those with a single comorbidity or RA only.Acknowledgements:The study analysed the data from the Scottish Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (SERA) study with a linkage to routinely recorded health data from Information Service Division, National Service Scotland. We would like to thank all the patients, clinical and nursing colleagues who have contributed their time and support to the study, the SERA steering committee for the approval, and Allen Tervit from the Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow for the timely technical supports.Disclosure of Interests:Ping-Hsuan Hsieh: None declared, Claudia Geue: None declared, Olivia Wu Consultant of: OW has received consultancy fees from Bayer, Lupin and Takeda outside the submitted work., Emma McIntosh: None declared

Indirect Costs of Rheumatoid Arthritis Depending on Type of Treatment-A Systematic Literature Review.

The economic burden of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on society is high. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are the cornerstone of therapy. Biological DMARDs are reported to prevent disability and improve quality of life, thus reducing indirect RA costs. We systematically reviewed studies on the relationship between RA and indirect costs comparing biological treatment with standard care. Studies, economic analyses, and systematic reviews published until October 2018 through a MEDLINE search were included. A total of 153 non-duplicate citations were identified, 92 (60%) were excluded as they did not meet pre-defined inclusion criteria. Sixty-one articles were included, 17 of them (28%) were reviews. After full-text review, 28 articles were included, 11 of them were reviews. Costs associated with productivity loss are substantial; in several cases, they may represent over 50% of the total. The most common method of estimation is the Human Capital method. However, certain heterogeneity is observed in the method of estimating, as well as in the resultant figures. Data from included trials indicate that biological therapy is associated with improved labor force participation despite an illness, in which the natural course of disease is defined by progressive work impairment. Use of biological DMARDs may lead to significant indirect cost benefits to society.

Analysis of the Indirect Costs of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Romania.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased costs generated by resource utilization and loss of work productivity. We have studied 206 RA patients and analyzed indirect costs of RA in Romania (estimated using the human capital approach) in comparison with reported data for other countries. Data were collected using self-reported questionnaires. The average age at inclusion was 55 years, with mean disease duration of 9.4 years; 55 patients had permanent work disability due to RA; 6.35 days of sick leave per patient were reported for the entire year of follow-up; the cost of permanent work disability was 1256€ per patient. From a societal perspective, the average indirect costs for a patient with RA were 1506€, significantly lower than the ones reported by other countries, especially due to the low monetary value of paid work.

Economic Burden of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Italy: Possible Consequences on Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody-Positive Patients.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease with a substantial medical and economic burden. In Italy, it affects approximately 280,000 people, therefore representing the musculoskeletal disease with the highest economic impact in terms of costs for the National Health Service and the social security system. The aim of this study was to estimate the annual economic burden of RA in Italy and determine the potential cost reduction considering the most effective biologic treatment for early rapidly progressing RA (ERPRA) patients. The model developed considers both direct costs that are mainly due to the pharmacological treatments, and indirect costs, which also include the productivity lost because of the disease. A systematic literature review provided the epidemiological and economic data used to inform the model. A one-way probabilistic sensitivity analysis based on 5000 Monte Carlo simulations was performed. Furthermore, specific scenario analyses were developed for those patients presenting an ERPRA, with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness of different biologic treatments for this subgroup of patients and estimating potential cost reduction. The total economic burden associated with RA was estimated to be €2.0billion per year (95%confidence interval [CI] €1.8-2.3billion). Forty-five percent of the expenditure was due to indirect costs (95% CI €0.8-1.0billion); 45% depended on direct medical costs (95%CI €0.7-1.1billion), and the residual 10% was determined by direct non-medical costs (95%CI €0.16-0.25billion). In particular, the costs estimated for ERPRA patients totalled €76,171,181, of which approximately €18million was associated with patients with a high level of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA). The results of the analysis outline how it is possible to obtain a cost reduction for ERPRA patients of between €1 and €3million by varying the number of patients with a high level of immunoglobulinG treated with the most effective biologic drug. In fact, the latter may determine higher efficacy outcomes, especially for poor prognostic ERPRA patients, ensuing higher levels of productivity. This study presents a pioneering approach to estimate the direct and indirect costs of RA. The model developed is a useful tool for policy makers as it allows to understand the economic implications of RA treatment in Italy, identify the most effective allocation of resources, and select the most appropriate treatment for ERPRA patients.

Societal Costs of Rheumatoid Arthritis in China: A Hospital‐Based Cross‐Sectional Study

To estimate the annual direct and indirect costs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in China and identify the predictors for cost of illness. A cross-sectional study of cost of illness from the societal perspective was conducted on 829 patients with RA in 21 tertiary care hospitals in China between July 2009 and December 2010. Data on demographics, clinical variables, and components of costs were collected by physician interview. Costs were represented in 2009 US dollars using purchasing power parity estimates. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors for cost of illness. The mean ± SD total cost of RA in China was $3,826 ± $5,659 per patient-year, given a gross domestic product per capita of $6,798 in China in 2009. Direct costs and indirect costs comprised 90.0% and 10.0% of the total costs, respectively. Drug expense represented approximately half of the total costs, dominated by biologic agents (48.2%) and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (23.5%). Additionally, the cost of extracted herbal drugs and traditional Chinese medicine comprised ∼17.6% of the drug expense. Higher education level, noninsured status, longer disease duration, more extraarticular manifestations, and higher Health Assessment Questionnaire score independently predicted higher total costs. Our results provide the first study of costs of RA in China. This study not only demonstrates the economic burden of RA, but also identifies the predictors that could be interventional factors to reduce the societal costs of RA in China.

PMS50 Indirect Costs of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Serbia Related to Work Absenteeism, Medical Welfare and Rehabilitation Costs

PMS50 Indirect Costs of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Serbia Related to Work Absenteeism, Medical Welfare and Rehabilitation Costs

Indirect Costs of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Brazil

Objective The present study aimed to determine indirect costs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a sample of patients followed at a public health-care facility in Brazil. Factors potentially associated with higher indirect costs in these patients were also investigated. Methods This cross-sectional study included patients between 18 and 65 years old with RA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria. Patients who were working, on sick leave or retired early due to RA were invited to participate in the survey. A systematic structured interview was conducted in all patients including demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical variables and an experienced rheumatologist examined all patients. Estimates of the indirect costs in the preceding 12 months were performed using the human-capital approach based on the society perspective. Multiple linear regression models were used to determine the variables associated with higher indirect costs. Results A total of 192 patients were included in the study. Forty-seven of them (24.5%) had retired early due to RA, 62 others (32.3%) were on sick leave due to RA while 83 patients (43.2%) were working at the time of the interview. Estimated indirect cost for this population was US$ 466,107.81 or US$ 2,423.51 per patient per year. Factors associated with higher costs were RA poor functional class, high socioeconomic status and male patients (p < 0.001). Conclusions Estimated costs found in our population are similar to that described in more developed countries. Indirect costs were higher in patients with poor functional classes, high socioeconomic status, and men.

The need for standardization: A literature review of indirect costs of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis

The need for standardization: A literature review of indirect costs of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis

The Effects of Rheumatoid Arthritis on Labor Force Participation, Work Performance, and Healthcare Costs in Two Workplace Samples

To assess the workplace costs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the employer perspective. Samples included 4485 manufacturing firm (MF) employees (109 with RA) and 915 commercially insured (CO) subscribers (333 with RA). Respondents completed the Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). The effects of RA were estimated using regression analysis. RA was associated with increased probability of no longer working (CO), increased effort to maintain work performance (CO), increased sickness absence (MF), and increased non-RA pharmacy costs (CO). RA was not associated with hours worked or hourly wage. Indirect costs of RA did not exceed direct medical costs. Indirect costs of RA to employers are significant and warrant further research to increase our understanding of the contribution of different RA treatment interventions to optimizing workforce productivity.

Direct and indirect costs of rheumatoid arthritis and the socio-emotional effects of this disease – an Austrian study

The results of this Austrian study confirm the conclusions of earlier studies that high costs for the individual and for society result from rheumatoid arthritis. We were able to show the figures for direct costs; indirect costs could not be calculated in their entirety. Drugs--especially disease-modifying drugs--and inpatient treatment constitute the largest percentage of direct costs. We describe the enormous psychological and psychosocial impact of rheumatoid arthritis, pain, and reduced quality of life. The study also presents a basis for the decisions to be made by patients, physicians and health policy makers.

Adalimumab for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Third-party payors and national health systems require evidence that new medications for rheumatoid arthritis are cost effective. To determine cost effectiveness, one must consider the cost of a given therapy versus the long-term cost of the disease, with and without therapy. The direct and indirect costs of rheumatoid arthritis over the course of the disease, including the considerable costs related to hospitalization and disability, have been quantified. Resource utilization and treatment costs are high for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and there is a strong link between functional disability and direct cost of care. Traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) [such as methotrexate and gold] have limited long-term effects in improving lives and avoiding costs for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists, the newest class of rheumatoid arthritis drug therapies, significantly improve patient outcomes, including reducing the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis, improving physical function and health-related quality of life, and inhibiting radiographie damage. Failing to treat rheumatoid arthritis effectively is very costly; effective treatment includes early, aggressive therapy. As a result, the National Health Service in the UK, other societal decision-makers, and third-party payors have recommended the use of TNF antagonists, in many instances, for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The TNF antagonists — infliximab, etanercept, and the most recently approved, adalimumab — address the limitations of traditional DMARDs, thus setting a new therapeutic standard for rheumatoid arthritis. Data from three key studies (Anti-TNF Research Program of the Monoclonal Antibody Adalimumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis, DE019 and DE011) indicate that adalimumab provides a rapid, sustainable, predictable, and significantly greater reduction in the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis than traditional DMARDs. Adalimumab yields significantly less structural joint damage as measured by the total Sharp scores and scores on its two major components: joint erosions and joint space narrowing. It also improves physical function (as measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index) and health utility (as measured by the Health Utilities Index Mark 3). In conclusion, rheumatoid arthritis and other musculoskeletal diseases are costly, but an upfront investment in highly effective therapies may provide long-term cost savings compared with traditional therapies. The immediate, out-of-pocket costs of TNF antagonists are greater than traditional DMARDs, but with the potential to significantly improve response rates, inhibit structural joint damage, and improve disability and health utility, TNF antagonists have the potential to be more cost effective over the long run. TNF antagonists can be valuable for patients in need and therefore appropriate for reimbursement by national health systems and third-party payors.

Direct and indirect costs of rheumatoid arthritis to an employer.

This study is among the first to estimate the overall economic burden of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from an employer perspective. The annual, per capita cost of RA was determined for beneficiaries of a major employer by analyzing medical, pharmaceutical, and disability claims data. The incremental costs related to RA were determined by matching RA patients to a case-control group of individuals with no recorded RA treatment. The utilization of health care services as well as the rate of disability among RA patients was substantially higher than among the controls. For example, annual, per capita employer expenditures for RA employees with disability were almost 3 times those for their controls ($17,822 vs $6131, respectively). Treatment to address not only the severity but also the progression of RA may substantially reduce overall employer expenditures for this disease.

The costs of rheumatoid arthritis: an international long-term view

Objectives: To review the literature on the measurable direct and indirect costs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in industrialized countries from a societal perspective and to develop a template for international use. Methods: A literature search using MEDLINE and other sources identified153 relevant published articles, press releases, and so forth on the costs of RA and rheumatism from the major Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries in English and other languages. Sixty-eight publications provide some economic data for analysis and are included in the bibliography. Twelve publications provide sufficiently detailed and robust information for inclusion in country overview tables. The concept of varied costs at different disease stages measured by years since diagnosis and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores is used to guide rational decisions in the allocation of scarce health care resources. Results: Direct costs increase overproportionately during the course of thedisease. The most important driver of direct costs is hospitalization, especially in moderate and severe RA. Costs of medication represent a comparatively small proportion of direct costs. Indirect costs caused by work disability can be substantially higher than direct costs, particularly in working-age patients. The total costs of RA to society, and the different cost components such as direct and indirect costs, are broadly comparable in industrialized countries by their order of magnitude. Major confounding factors for international comparison are different study methodologies, and patient samples. Conclusions: The cost template developed in this article can be used toestimate the likely costs of RA to society for industrialized countries. It probably will underestimate indirect costs because of their incomplete cover age in the studies examined. A long-term perspective is needed for chronic diseases such as RA to assess the future effects of early interventions. Treatment in the early stages of RA that effectively reduces long-term disability has the potential to save substantial costs to society.

Cost evaluation of novel therapeutics in rheumatoid arthritis (CENTRA):A decision analysis model

This study was performed to evaluate the potential costs of a hypotheticalnovel biological agent (BIO) as a therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), compared with oral methotrexate (MTX) and intramuscular gold (IMG). A decision analysis model was used to compare the total costs of treating a cohort of 10,000 RA patients with each agent for 6 months. Total costs included direct costs and indirect costs. Baseline estimates were subjected to sensitivity analysis. Total costs per person were: MTX, $5,430; IMG, $6,725; BIO, $9,411. In sensitivity analysis, the primary cost drivers for MTX and IMG were the indirect costs of RA and monitoring costs. In contrast, total costs of the BIO were driven predominantly by medication costs. Sensitivity analysis showed, even when efficacy and safety were optimized, costs for the BIO still substantially exceeded those of MTX and IMG. Medication costs will be an important consideration in the development of novel BIOS for RA.

The costs of rheumatoid arthritis.

The economic costs associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic, systemic, inflammatory disorder that affects many joints, are high, approximating those of coronary heart disease. The estimated prevalence of RA in the US is 0.9%. Incidence increases with age, and is highest among women in the fourth to sixth decades of life. The primary impact of RA is due to the significant morbidity associated with this disease. Mortality is increased among a poorly defined subgroup of RA patients. The average level of disability among RA patients is moderate, but 6.5 to 12% of patients are severely disabled. Between one- and two-thirds of previously employed patients have a reduced work capacity. Treatment primarily involves the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. Rehabilitation measures and orthopaedic surgery are also used. Total annual direct costs of RA (total charges) have been calculated to be $US5275 and $US6099 (1991 dollars) per patient. Lifetime medical care charges were estimated at $US12,578 per patient (1991 dollars). The direct costs of RA are substantial, but indirect costs have been calculated to be much higher because of extensive morbidity. The difference between the direct and indirect costs of RA is decreasing because salary increases have not kept pace with rising healthcare costs. The latter are increasing rapidly in RA because of the use of new technology, surgical procedures, and the greater use of drugs with frequent monitoring requirements and significant toxicity. Because intangible costs such as pain form a substantial part of the overall costs of RA but are difficult to evaluate, cost estimates inevitably underestimate the impact of the disease on individuals and society.

Rheumatoid arthritis and the use of medical services.

Although there have been several studies examining the direct and indirect costs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), no studies have analyzed the group and individual factors that are associated with the use of services among RA patients. The present study applies the behavioral model of health services utilization developed by Andersen to data derived from interviews with 288 RA patients. The behavioral model proposes that the use of services is related to predisposing, enabling, and need variables. All visits within 6 months of the interview that were initiated by the patient, requested by the physician, in response to RA flare-ups and/or for physical therapy were analyzed. Ever having had surgery for RA also was analyzed. The results indicate that predisposing and enabling variables are related to use among these RA patients and, therefore, use is not a simple function of need.