Indian Initial Public Offerings Research Articles

Short-Term Performance of Indian Initial Public Offerings (IPOs)

The pricing of IPO’s in the short-term has been analyzed by several theoretical and empirical studies referring to the world’s major stock markets. Studies have also observed that IPOs cause increase in price considerably on the first day of trading and provide huge returns to investors who buy at the initial offer price and sell immediately in the secondary market. This research presents the results of the analysis related to the short-term performance of the Indian IPOs under study. Event study methodology is used to analyze the short term performance of IPOs from January 2016 to December 2022 issued in Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), India. The average positive return on the listing day is 18.5 percent which indicates that the IPOs are underpriced.

INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS IN INDIA – A STRUCTURAL REVIEW

<p>This research offers a comprehensive analysis of the structural aspects of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) in India, covering the period from the pre-liberalization era to the current time. The research paper examines the IPO landscape in India, a vibrant economy in Asia, by gathering a comprehensive dataset from various sources, including the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) archives, financial reports, and other pertinent sources. It analyzes the evolutionary patterns, regulatory changes, and significant events that have influenced the development of IPOs in the country. The primary findings indicate that regulatory changes, economic growth trajectories, and global financial conditions have significantly influenced initial public offerings (IPOs) volume and valuation. The research methodology involved meticulous data collection from reputable academic databases, primarily Mendeley and Scopus, spanning over five decades. This extensive dataset forms the foundation for our robust and insightful analysis. The study additionally emphasizes the significance of India's distinctive socio-economic structure, which has enabled and restricted the advancement of the capital market. By conducting a comparative analysis between India's framework and worldwide best practices, this study aims to identify areas of convergence and divergence. The paper finishes by providing policy proposals that enhance the resilience and inclusiveness of the Indian Initial Public Offering (IPO) market for a diverse range of issuers and investors.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>JEL</strong>: O10, O16</p><p> </p><p><strong> Article visualizations:</strong></p><p><img src="/-counters-/soc/0016/a.php" alt="Hit counter" /></p>

Studies on Indian IPO: systematic review and future research agenda

PurposeThis paper aims to review, discuss and synthesize the literature focusing on the Indian initial public offering (IPO) market. Understanding the Indian IPO market can help answer broader corporate finance questions. The growing number of IPOs in the Indian context, coupled with the increasing importance of the Indian economy in the global market, makes this review an essential topic.Design/methodology/approachThe systematic literature review methodology was adopted to review 111 papers published between 2002 and 2021. The authors used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach during the review process. Additionally, the authors use a bibliometric review methodology to examine the pattern and trend of research in this area of interest. Furthermore, the authors conduct a critical review and synthesis of the top 20 papers based on citations. The authors also use a co-citation network and manual content analysis method to identify key research themes.FindingsThis review helps in identifying major themes of research in this area of interest. The authors find that majority of the research has focused on IPO performance whereas post-IPO performance needs critical attention as well. The authors develop a comprehensive framework and future research agenda based on their discussion.Research limitations/implicationsMeta-analysis of the literature can be conducted to gain better insights into the findings of prior studies.Practical implicationsThis review paper develops a comprehensive overview on Indian IPO market which can be of interest not only to Indian scholarship. India as an economy is increasingly gaining attention at the global level. Hence, the future research objectives as illustrated in the study can be of interest for the global scholarship also.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review paper that examines, synthesizes and outlines the future research agenda on Indian IPO studies. This review can be useful for researchers, business policymakers, finance professionals and anyone else interested in the Indian IPO market.

Investor attention and IPO returns: evidence from Indian markets

PurposeThe regulatory design of Indian stock market provides us with the opportunity to disaggregate initial returns into two categories, i.e. voluntary premarket underpricing and post market mispricing. This study explores the impact of investor attention on the disaggregated short-run returns and long-run performance of initial public offerings (IPOs).Design/methodology/approachThe study employs regression techniques on the sample of IPOs listed from 2005 to 2019. It measures investor attention with the help of the Google Search Volume Index (GSVI) extracted from Google Trends. Along with GSVI, the subscription rate is used as a proxy to measure investor attention.FindingsThe empirical results suggest a positive and significant relationship between initial returns and investor attention, thus validating the attention theory for Indian IPOs. Furthermore, when the returns are analysed for a more extended period using buy-and-hold abnormal returns (BHARs), it was found that price reversal holds in the long run.Research limitations/implicationsThis study highlights the importance of information diffusion in the market. It emphasizes the behavioural tendency of the investors in the pre-market, which reduces the market efficiency. Hence, along with fundamentals, investor attention also plays an essential role in deciding the returns for an IPO.Originality/valueAccording to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the first studies that has attempted to explore the influence of investor attention and its interplay with underpricing and long-run performance for IPOs of Indian markets.

Deliberate underpricing and after-market mispricing in Indian IPO market: Stochastic frontier approach

Purpose This paper aims to study the underpricing phenomenon of initial public offerings (IPOs) of 355 Indian companies issued from 2007 to 2019. The research question this paper empirically examines is whether Indian corporate executives deliberately underprice IPOs from its fair value to attract investors, thereby causing an abnormal spike in the prices on the listing day. The findings of this study challenge a commonly held notion of leaving money on the table by IPO issuing companies. Of the overall average listing day returns of 17%, the deliberate premarket underpricing component is found to be mere 5.3%, while the remaining price fluctuation is, inter alia, a result of market momentum along with the unmet demands of impatient investors. Design/methodology/approach Following Koop and Li (2001), this study uses Stochastic frontier model (SFM) to study a routine anomaly of disparity between the primary market price (i.e. IPO issue price) and the secondary market price (listing price). The jump in the issue price observed on a listing day is decomposed into deliberate premarket underpricing component that reflects the extent of managerial manipulation and the after-market misvaluation component attributable to information asymmetry and prevailing market volatility. Findings This paper uses SFM to bifurcate initial returns into deliberate underpricing by managers and after-market mispricing by noise traders. This study finds that a significant part of the initial return is explained through after-market mispricing. This study finds that average initial returns are 17%, deliberate premarket underpricing is 5.3% and after-market mispricing averages 11.9%. Research limitations/implications This study can isolate underpricing done at the premarket by estimating a systematic one-sided error term that measures the maximum predicted issue price deviation from the offered price. Consequentially, the disaggregation of initial returns may be especially informative for retail investors in planning their exit strategy from an IPO by separating the strength of the firm's fundamentals and its causal relationship with the initial returns. Substantial proportion of after-market mispricing implies that future research should focus on factors causing after-market mispricing. As underlying causes are identified, tailor-made policy responses can be formulated to benefit investors. Practical implications This paper has empirically validated that initial return is a mix of both components, i.e. deliberate underpricing and aftermarket mispricing. This disaggregation of initial returns can prove helpful for investors in planning their exit strategy. This study can help investors to become more aware of the importance of the fundamentals of the firm and its causal relation with the initial returns. This information in turn can help reduce the information asymmetry amongst investors and help them lessen the costs of adverse selection. Originality/value A large number of research studies on IPO pricing find overwhelming evidence of underpricing in public issues. This research attempts to decompose the extent of underpricing into deliberate underpricing and after-market mispricing, thereby supplementing the existing literature on the IPO pricing puzzle. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first contribution to the literature on initial return decomposition for the Indian capital markets.

Analyzing the Relationship Between Psychological Biases and Initial Public Offerings Investment Decision-making in India

The study investigates the effect of psychological biases on investment decision-making in the financial market with particular reference to the initial public offerings (IPO) market in India. The research is conducted by administering a self-completion questionnaire to measure selected psychological biases. Using the structural equation modelling (SEM) technique of the multivariate analysis, the study analyzes a sample of 230 individual IPO investors and examines the effect of the selected psychological biases on the degree of irrationality in the market. The findings of the study reveal that investors are prone to availability and representativeness biases. This study suggests that an augmented understanding of fundamental psychological biases of human decision-making would help the Indian IPO market achieve a more significant level of market efficiency. The contribution of this research lies in its practical implications to the issuer of the issue, intermediaries and market regulators. JEL Classification: G11, G23, G41

Disclosed qualitative factors and underpricing: an empirical evidence from Indian IPO market

PurposeThe academic research into underpricing of initial public offerings (IPOs) offers many explanations, i.e. signalling, financial and market hypothesis. However, another set of information, namely, “Qualitative Factors” (along with financial and others), are largely reported by the issuing firms in the prospectus. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge no such systematic study has been carried out on how firms’ qualitative factors impact the IPO valuation. This paper aims to addresses this gap.Design/methodology/approachUsing a sample of 82 IPOs issued from 2014 to 2020, we investigate the issuing firm’s pattern of reporting qualitative factors. These qualitative factors are subjected to factor analysis. The authors classify all reported factors across firms into a few categories using principal component analysis. The authors also investigate the impact of these factors on IPO underpricing using OLS regression.FindingsThe authors find that the qualitative information relating to market leadership, established brand image and modern scalable information technology infrastructure significantly influences underpricing. The authors also document that market leadership and brand image are the influential reported quality factors that reduce underpricing. Moreover, location advantage, good customer relationship, established relationship with a client, track record of growth and profitability, experienced promoter and management team failed to influence underpricing.Originality/valueThe outcome of this piece of research offers additional signalling as an attestation of quality for the issue. The authors further argue that the amount of qualitative information disclosed by the managers in the prospectus to support the pricing should not be ignored.

Earnings management and issue characteristics: an empirical analysis of IPOs in India

PurposeThis study aims to examine earnings management around initial public offerings (IPOs) in India. It also explores the influence of issue characteristics on earnings management around the IPOs.Design/methodology/approachA sample of 511 IPOs that came during April 2003-March 2019 is studied for calculating earnings management for pre-issue, issue and post-issue years. Using Cross-Sectional Modified Jones Model, the paper presents earnings management on the basis of three proxies i.e. discretionary accruals, discretionary current accruals and discretionary long-term accruals. The influence of issue characteristics on earnings management practised around the IPOs is also observed through correlation and multiple regression analysis.FindingsThe paper finds that earnings management is abnormally high during the issue year compared with pre-issue and post-issue years. It also unveils that profitability, premium, age, and size of the issuer significantly determine the level of pre-issue and issue year earnings management practised by Indian IPO issuers.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings are useful to stakeholders (potential investors, analysts and regulators) to observe, assess and understand the quality of financial numbers that are based on fallacious disclosure of accounting figures. It provides insight into the possibilities of managed earnings around the issue that could influence investors’ decision-making. Further, the study reflects the efficacy of Indian regulatory norms for IPOs.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, it is the only Indian study that had used an extensive data set of about two decades to calculate earnings management during pre-issue, issue and post-issue years. The uniqueness of the study further lies in three proxies of earnings management representing short-term and long-term accruals. Moreover, it is the first study to observe the influence of IPO issue characteristics on earnings management.

The impact of media sentiments on IPO underpricing

PurposeIn initial public offerings (IPOs), the media plays a pivotal role by disseminating the information to the investors who generally lack the expertise to understand the information through the prospectus. Thus, media coverage can impact the investment decision of the investors and the IPO performance. Media typically covers the IPO before listing, suggesting that it may play an important role in explaining the opening price rather than the closing price on the day of listing. Therefore, this study aims to disaggregate the traditional IPO underpricing into three categories: voluntary, pre-market and post-market and provides a comparative analysis of the media sentiments impact on the traditional and disaggregated IPO underpricing. The authors’ disaggregated IPO underpricing analysis will facilitate the investors in making an effective investment strategy based on media sentiments.Design/methodology/approachThe study deploys sentiment analysis using bags of n (2) grams approach to gauge the sentiments on 2,891 media articles and uses “robust-regression” technique to analyze them on a sample of 222 Indian IPOs during 2009–2018.FindingsThe study reports that the sentiment score is positively related to the traditional underpricing; the sentiment score is positively associated with the pre-market underpricing and does not have any significant relationship with the post-market underpricing; the number of media articles does not play a significant role in explaining the IPO underpricing. The findings highlight the presence of a semi-strong form of efficiency in the Indian IPO market.Originality/valueExisting literature focuses that the role of media on IPO performance is based on the developed countries. IPO laws differ based on the countries. For instance, in India, investors can check the demand by the other categories of investors on a real-time basis. Thus, it is interesting to study whether, with such a high level of transparency, media can explain IPO performance in the Indian market. Media generally covers IPO before listing; therefore, the present study disaggregates the IPO underpricing to evaluate the role of media on the primary and secondary market separately. It will help the investors to decide when to enter and exit the market.

Impact of Quality of Involvement of VC/PE in IPO Firms: Evidence from India

This article draws its primary motivation from the steady rise in the participation and involvement of venture capital/private equity (VC/PE) funds in the Indian IPO market over the last couple of decades. The study explores the involvement quality of the VC/PE managers and its impact on the long-run equity and operating performance of Indian firms issuing securities through initial public offerings (IPOs). Using data for 173 IPOs backed by VC/PE funding (out of a total of 625 IPOs) from 2000 to 2016, the authors show that post-issue, both equity market performance and operating performance of these VC/PE-backed IPOs are unimpressive in general. The information asymmetry, mispricing, and “timing the market” do not seem to be reasons for such long-term underperformance. The authors argue that it may be a case of too much money chasing too few winners in the Indian VC/PE-backed IPO market. The study utilizes a unique, hand-collected data set (from IPO prospectuses) on VC/PE firms’ involvement quality. Findings indicate that the duration and the size of the stake that the VC/PE firms hold in the pre-issue period positively affect the post-issue performance of IPOs. These findings lend support to the previously theorized “monitoring” and “certification” role of VC/PE firms. <b>Key Findings</b> ▪ Both long-term market and operating performance of VC/PE-backed IPOs in India from 2000 to 2016 were unimpressive. ▪ The quality of VC/PE involvement has some impact on the post-IPO performance of investee firms. ▪ The VC/PE-backed IPOs are not engaged in timing (hot and cold periods) the market.

Do anchor investors affect long run performance? Evidence from Indian IPO markets

PurposeAnchor investor (AI) regulation was introduced in 2009 by the Indian market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India to facilitate the price discovery process during the book-building mechanism. This study aims to examine the aftermarket pricing performance of initial public offering (IPO) firms over the long-run period of up to 36 months after the listing date in the anchor investor regime.Design/methodology/approachThe post-issue performance of 129 Indian IPOs issued from 2009 to 2014 is studied by using buy and hold abnormal returns, cumulative abnormal returns and wealth relatives approaches. This study presents the aftermarket performance indicators of Indian IPOs along with the comparative analysis between anchor-backed and non-anchor-backed IPO categories. Using multiple regression analysis, this study identifies the firm-level variables and issue characteristics that can explain long-term IPO performance.FindingsThis study reports that Indian IPOs continue to underperform in the long run in the anchor regulation era as well. However, anchor-backed IPOs are reported to underperform lesser than the IPOs not backed by anchor investment. Additionally, this study documents that the variables, i.e. offer size, grade, post-issue promoter holding and IPOs issued during hot IPO periods, are significant in explaining the 36-month aftermarket performance.Originality/valueThis study investigates the long-run aftermarket pricing performance of anchor affiliated IPOs in the Indian market context. Thus, it contributes to the limited primary markets’ research from emerging economies. Further, the results provide fresh evidence reaffirming the credibility of AI as an institutional investor for attestation of quality of the issues.

Earnings Management and IPO Anomalies—Evidence from Indian Stock Market

This study examines the relationship between the extent of earnings management in a firm, the level of underpricing during an initial public offering (IPO), and their long-term performance. Earnings management has been acknowledged as a matter of concern during IPOs since long; however, its relationship with underpricing and long-term returns remained inconclusive in emerging markets like India. Using a sample of Indian IPO firms, this study finds that firms that manage accruals aggressively in the pre-IPO period have high initial returns and subsequently low stock returns in the post-IPO period. This study also observed that firms that have used abnormal accruals more conservatively while reporting earnings have better returns in the third year after IPO compared to the firms that reported more aggressively. The results are in consonance with the theory of information asymmetry and suggest that valuation of an IPO firm becomes ambiguous with high level of earnings management, which leads to higher underpricing.

Does Cap Size and Pricing of Issues Influence Wealth Creation of Indian Initial Public Offering Investors? - An Empirical Investigation

Does Cap Size and Pricing of Issues Influence Wealth Creation of Indian Initial Public Offering Investors? - An Empirical Investigation

Does Cap Size and Pricing of Issues Influence Wealth Creation of Indian Initial Public Offering Investors? - An Empirical Investigation

Does Cap Size and Pricing of Issues Influence Wealth Creation of Indian Initial Public Offering Investors? - An Empirical Investigation

Does Cap Size and Pricing of Issues Influence Wealth Creation of Indian Initial Public Offering Investors? - An Empirical Investigation

Does Cap Size and Pricing of Issues Influence Wealth Creation of Indian Initial Public Offering Investors? - An Empirical Investigation

Earnings Management and Long-run Post-issue Performance of IPOs in India

The controversies surrounding accounting figures bring forth the downgraded quality of financial statements in India. Opportunistic management of earnings at the cost of stakeholders’ interest requires prompt regulatory measure as they may become grave in high profile corporate events like mergers and public issues. Focusing on one of the most important mega events of initial public offerings (IPOs) the present study evaluates the accounting figure of IPOs that came out during April 2010 to March 2013. The study measures pre and post issue earnings management for a time span of 11 years from April 2008 to March 2019 and post issue long run earnings and stock performance using Modified Jones Model (1995) for a time span of seven years including issue year and six post issue years. The study provides evidence of earnings management by Indian IPO firms and post issue earnings and stock underperformance due to reversal of discretionary current accruals of issue year. The study emphasizes on better monitoring and regulatory environment and precise definition of accounting choices to control managed accounts to avoid frequent fraud incidents.

Determinants of oversubscription of SME IPOs in India: evidence from quantile regression

PurposeThe study aims to measure the subscription level and examine the determinants of oversubscription of small and medium enterprise (SME) initial public offerings (IPOs) in India.Design/methodology/approachThe study employs cross sectional data to analyze 403 SME IPOs issued from Feb 2012 to May 2018 and listed on Bombay Stock Exchange's small and medium enterprise (BSE SME) platform and National Stock Exchange (NSE) EMERGE to investigate the determinants of oversubscription of SME IPOs. Hence, the study makes use of ordinary least square regression and quantile regression to test the hypotheses formulated for the determinants of oversubscription.FindingsThe main findings unveil that while issue price, pricing mechanism, listing delay negatively influence oversubscription; firm size, underwriter reputation, hot market and underpricing have been divulged to positively influence oversubscription. However, issue size emerged out to be significant in quantile regression at 25th, 50th and 75th quantiles.Research limitations/implicationsThe present study is confined to limited number of variables in understanding the factors impacting oversubscription. Future studies could include macroeconomic variables like gross domestic product (GDP), inflation rate, industry specific variable, i.e. technology/nontechnology industry, financial/nonfinancial industry for better understanding. Cross country analysis is suggested in future studies to validate the findings of current study. Future studies are advised to conduct the study examining the factors affecting oversubscription in light of COVID-19 pandemic.Practical implicationsThe findings of the present study offer implications to academicians, investors, investment advisors and regulators. It provides useful insights to researchers by listing the factors that contribute to variation in subscription levels in emerging economy like India thereby, paving the way for future researches in SME IPOs in countries with different institutional settings. For investors, the study provides additional and novel information useful for IPO valuation and informed investment decisions. In addition, the findings put investment advisors in better place to guide potential investors regarding investment in good quality SME stocks (i.e. highly subscribed stocks) in more informative manner. Last but not the least, as this study would assist the regulators in handling future IPOs in a way that augments the chances of success of SME IPOs.Originality/valueThis study is a novel contribution in widening the IPO literature by examining the relationship between pre-IPO firm actions like issue price, pricing mechanism, issue size, firm size, listing delay, underwriter reputation, hot market, underpricing and oversubscription in unexplored settings of Indian SME IPOs.

The long-run performance of SME IPOs in India: empirical evidence from Indian stock market

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to study the pattern of long-run performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) initial public offerings (IPOs) and examine the firm- and issue-related determinants of long-run performance of SME IPOs in India.Design/methodology/approachThe 3 6, 9 and 12 months share returns of Indian SME IPOs is studied using event time methodologies, i.e. buy and hold returns, cumulative abnormal returns and wealth relatives on a sample of 375 SME IPOs issued during February 2012 to May 2018. Additionally, ordinary least square regression has been used to investigate the determinants of long-run performance of SME IPOs on a reduced sample of 104 because of non-availability of price observations.FindingsThe findings reveal that Indian SME IPOs exhibit long-run overperformance contradicting the international evidences of underperformance, and this overperformance is significantly evident using buy and hold abnormal return (BHAR). Furthermore, based on the divergence of opinion hypothesis, fads theory and windows of opportunity hypothesis, the results reveal that on one hand, issue size and oversubscription negatively affect BHAR, while on the other hand, auditor reputation, underwriter reputation, hot market, underpricing, inverse of issue price, profits prior to listing positively affect long-run performance. However, firm age, firm size, debt equity ratio, volatility and long-run performance computed through BHAR lacks significant relationship.Research limitations/implicationsThe study relied on event time methodology of measuring aftermarket performance of one year because of the limited availability of price offerings. Hence, the study could be extended to analyze aftermarket returns over a period of three to five years to enable reaching the vivid conclusions. Calendar time methodology may also be used to compute abnormal returns.Practical implicationsThe results based on the study provides an implication to the investors by providing them an opportunity to bank higher long-run returns by engaging in active and timely trading strategies. Nevertheless, the results also show that investors should be cautioned while taking investment decisions.Originality/valueThe study contributes to rising body of international literature by analyzing the larger and recent sample of IPOs issued from 2012 to 2018 listed on SME exchange.

Short-run performance evaluation of under-priced Indian IPOs

The under-pricing of Initial Public Offerings (IPO) speaks to one of the inconsistencies seen in essential markets (primary market) worldwide, however, the profundity and broadness of its shift from nation to nation. In this context, the study is a posteriori analysis of the short-run performance of Indian IPOs in the National Stock Exchange (NSE). The study aims to determine the relationship between the returns of IPOs and NIFTY50 (benchmark index) using correlation and regression analysis. To determine the performance of the IPOs, whether they are outperforming or underperforming using Wealth Relative Model. As the investors look for attractive returns through primary market opportunities, therefore, historical returns of trading days 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 are taken into consideration. The study uses data of 114 Indian IPOs that were listed in the NSE during the period 2014–2018 as part of secondary data, however, a total of 71 under-priced IPOs listed in the NSE are utilized for analysis. The study concludes there is a significant under-pricing of IPOs with trading day 15th showing the highest initial returns.

Do Female Directors Signal Indian SME IPOs Quality? Evidence From a Quantile Regression Approach

The purpose of this article is to examine the influence of female directors on the underpricing of small and medium enterprise (SME) initial public offerings (IPOs) in an emerging country like India which is relatively a fruitful setting to investigate. The research in relatively underexplored area is undertaken using a sample of 403 SME IPOs issued between 2012 and 2018. Ordinary least square (OLS) regression (mean regression) and quantile regression (QR, median regression) has been used to examine the signaling role of female directors on listing day performance of Indian SME IPOs. The results unveil that presence of female directors on IPO board reduces the underpricing. However, the negative relationship lacks statistical association between the variables. Similar results have been obtained when proportion of female directors instead of female dummies is used to gauge the impact on underpricing. The study highlights the need to increase the proportion of women directors on board to break the ‘glass ceiling’ and capitalize their talent for improving IPO performance. The extant research investigating the impact of female directors has largely been concentrated on larger companies in developed countries. Thus, the present research contributes to the literature by examining its influence in context of IPOs of smaller firms which needs effective signals to communicate true quality to investors thereby gaining societal legitimacy.