Index Of Multiple Deprivation Score Research Articles

Education to improve timeliness of shingles diagnosis: Cluster RCT and qualitative study.

Herpes zoster (shingles) is normally diagnosed clinically. Timely diagnosis is important so antiviral treatment can be started soon after rash onset. To assess whether a practice-level educational intervention, aimed at non-clinical patient-facing staff, improves the timely assessment of patients with shingles. Cluster randomised Study Within A Trial (SWAT) with nested qualitative study in General Practices in England. Practices were cluster randomised 1:1, stratified by centre and minimised by practice list size and index of multiple deprivation score. Intervention practices were sent educational materials, highlighting the common presenting features of shingles and what action to take if suspected. The primary and secondary outcomes were the mean proportion of patients per practice seen within 72 hours and 144 of rash onset, respectively. Comparison between groups was conducted using linear regression, adjusting for randomisation variables. Semi-structured interviews with practice staff in intervention practices explored views and opinions of the intervention. 67 practices were enrolled; 34 randomised to intervention, 33 to control. The mean difference in proportion of patients seen within 72 and 144 hours was -0.132 (95% CI -0.308, 0.043) and -0.039 (95% CI -0.158, 0.080), respectively. In intervention practices, 90.5% reported distributing the educational materials, however engagement with these was suboptimal. 12 participants were interviewed, and the poster component of the intervention was said to be easiest to implement. Our educational intervention did not improve the timely assessment of patients with shingles. This may be the result of poor intervention engagement.

Descriptive study of COVID-19 vaccinations and infections within an NHS workforce.

Healthcare workers were a priority group for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination during the pandemic. Occupational exposure may account for some of the increased risk faced. Describe COVID-19 vaccine uptake and infection rates in staff across a large NHS board in Scotland to better understand occupational risk during the pandemic. Descriptive cross-sectional study. Demographic data were extracted on 5 August 2021 from 26 058 members of staff. COVID-19 vaccination status and positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results were extracted on two separate dates to describe the timeline of staff infections between March 2020 and January 2022. There was high uptake of all three vaccine doses across all demographic groups in hospital staff. PCR positivity decreased with increasing age and Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation score. Staff and nosocomial COVID-19 infections followed peaks in community infection rates. NHS Lothian is a typical NHS workforce with good vaccine uptake. Beyond very early cases, there seems to be minimal evidence of occupational acquisition of COVID-19. The large number of nosocomial infections at the start of the pandemic may, in fact, reflect lack of community testing at this time. Despite protection from high vaccine coverage, job type and good Infection Prevention and Control practices, it seems that staff remain at high risk of catching the highly transmissible omicron variant from the community rather than work.

Clinical and health inequality risk factors for non-COVID-related sepsis during the global COVID-19 pandemic: a national case-control and cohort study

Sepsis, characterised by significant morbidity and mortality, is intricately linked to socioeconomic disparities and pre-admission clinical histories. This study aspires to elucidate the association between non-COVID-19 related sepsis and health inequality risk factors amidst the pandemic in England, with a secondary focus on their association with 30-day sepsis mortality. With the approval of NHS England, we harnessed the OpenSAFELY platform to execute a cohort study and a 1:6 matched case-control study. A sepsis diagnosis was identified from the incident hospital admissions record using ICD-10 codes. This encompassed 248,767 cases with non-COVID-19 sepsis from a cohort of 22.0 million individuals spanning January 1, 2019, to June 31, 2022. Socioeconomic deprivation was gauged using the Index of Multiple Deprivation score, reflecting indicators like income, employment, and education. Hospitalisation-related sepsis diagnoses were categorised as community-acquired or hospital-acquired. Cases were matched to controls who had no recorded diagnosis of sepsis, based on age (stepwise), sex, and calendar month. The eligibility criteria for controls were established primarily on the absence of a recorded sepsis diagnosis. Associations between potential predictors and odds of developing non-COVID-19 sepsis underwent assessment through conditional logistic regression models, with multivariable regression determining odds ratios (ORs) for 30-day mortality. The study included 224,361 (10.2%) cases with non-COVID-19 sepsis and 1,346,166 matched controls. The most socioeconomic deprived quintile was associated with higher odds of developing non-COVID-19 sepsis than the least deprived quintile (crude OR 1.80 [95% CI 1.77-1.83]). Other risk factors (after adjusting comorbidities) such as learning disability (adjusted OR 3.53 [3.35-3.73]), chronic liver disease (adjusted OR 3.08 [2.97-3.19]), chronic kidney disease (stage 4: adjusted OR 2.62 [2.55-2.70], stage 5: adjusted OR 6.23 [5.81-6.69]), cancer, neurological disease, immunosuppressive conditions were also associated with developing non-COVID-19 sepsis. The incidence rate of non-COVID-19 sepsis decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic and rebounded to pre-pandemic levels (April 2021) after national lockdowns had been lifted. The 30-day mortality risk in cases with non-COVID-19 sepsis was higher for the most deprived quintile across all periods. Socioeconomic deprivation, comorbidity and learning disabilities were associated with an increased odds of developing non-COVID-19 related sepsis and 30-day mortality in England. This study highlights the need to improve the prevention of sepsis, including more precise targeting of antimicrobials to higher-risk patients. The UK Health Security Agency, Health Data Research UK, and National Institute for Health Research.

The role of the multiple Index of deprivation in predicting mental health outcomes after the COVID-19 pandemic in adolescents: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundThe number of children and young people (CYP) diagnosed with mental health problems has increased over the past decade. The COVID-19 pandemic also has accelerated this increase, raising significant concerns about adolescent emotional wellbeing. Research suggests that adolescents who live in more deprived areas are more likely to experience poor emotional wellbeing. Children in the northwest of England are among those with the poorest outcomes in the UK. We aimed to investigate the association between deprivation and mental health outcomes from 2019 to 2022. The aim was to support local authorities with targeted provision of public health services as well as predicting service need for 2022 onwards. MethodsIn this cross-sectional study, we analysed routinely collected Schools Health Needs Assessment (SHNA) data. The School Health Needs Assessment dataset contained 32 676 responses from Year 6 (ages 10–11 years) and Year 9 (ages 13–14 years) who completed the annual survey in 2019–22. The questionnaire was offered to all mainstream schools, delivered by the public health school nursing service. Index of multiple deprivation (IMD) data were provided for household postcodes. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS. Factor analysis created a composite emotional wellbeing scale (EWS) and estimates generated by school year (Years 6 and 9) and three academic years (2019–22). We calculated correlations between IMD and EWS overall and within school and academic year samples. FindingsThe final total sample across the three consecutive survey years and the two school years was 32 659. The sample consisted of 15 932 (49%) female students and 5066 (16%) students who registered at school as from an ethnic minority. Of the total sample, 9209 (28%) lived in a postcode in the most deprived IMD quintile in England. There was an overall decrease in EWS from Year 6 to Year 9 and from 2019 to 2022. The Year 6 students in 2022 reported mean levels of EWS equivalent to Year 9 students in 2019 indicating a shift toward poorer mental health in younger children. The correlational analyses showed no significant associations between IMD and EWS scores within the school or academic year cohorts. A follow-up analysis of children in receipt or not in receipt of free school meals also showed no significant association with EWS scores. InterpretationFindings showed that the emotional wellbeing of children and young people in the northwest of England has deteriorated since 2019, with greatest changes observed in the younger cohort of children in Year 6. This was not explained by postcode-based indices of multiple deprivation. Although it is recognised that deprivation is both a cause and a result of poor mental health, policy decisions on service provision for children and young people should not be based solely on IMD or receipt of free school meals. A rapid response is required to address the decline in emotional wellbeing currently observed in younger children of the northwest of England. FundingNone.

Demographics and deprivation in obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a retrospective cohort study.

The present study analyses the relationships between deprivation and obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP). A retrospective observational study was conducted of infants with OBPP seen between 2008 and 2020 (n = 321). The index of multiple deprivation (IMD) was used to assign an IMD rank to patients based on birth postcode and the relationship with OBPP was analysed, including deprivation, gestational diabetes, age at referral and at first assessment. Quintile-based analysis demonstrated over-representation of patients from more deprived neighbourhoods (n = 109, 39%) living in the top 20% most deprived neighbourhoods. A total of 48 (15%) mothers had diabetes and 98 (31%) infants underwent surgical brachial plexus exploration (a marker of disease severity). Neither diabetes, age at referral nor age at first assessment were associated with IMD score. This suggests that neighbourhood deprivation is associated with OBPP, though the mechanisms are unclear. Further studies in this area may enable targeted health intervention for more deprived maternal and infant groups.Level of evidence: III.

WTP3.11 The impact of inpatient Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography on total length of hospital stay

Abstract Aims Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a frequently performed inpatient imaging modality to rule out bile duct stones (BDS). The aim of the study was to quantify the time delays from request of MRCP to its execution. Methods A retrospective cohort study of all consecutive adult inpatient MRCPs was conducted in a single centre from October 2021 to September 2022. Patient demographics, indications for MRCP, system timestamps for MRCP scans and length of stay (LOS) were analysed. Peak liver function test values were used pre-MRCP. Results A total of 302 patients were identified, 181 (59.9%) were female. Median age was 65 (IQR 50-76) and median Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation score was 5 (IQR 3-8). 59 (19.5 %) MRCPs were performed for jaundice and 55 (18.2 %) were for gallstone pancreatitis. 104 (34.3%) had proven bile duct stones (BDS). Ultrasound and/or CT evidence of dilated bile ducts was strongly correlated with positive MRCP findings (p<0.001). Patient age, gender, bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels were not predictive for BDS. 112 (37.1%) were urgent requests. The median wait time for urgent MRCP was 1.0 days (IQR 0.6- 1.8) compared to 1.2 days (IQR 0.9- 2.7) for routine requests. Median LOS was 5.9 days (IQR 3.6-10.9). Conclusion Inpatient MRCP does not significantly impact total LOS. We conclude that patients with high risk factors for BDS should undergo MRCP as inpatients to mitigate complications of BDS.

P-444 The use of socioeconomic deprivation as an explanation of variation in IVF success rates between clinics

Abstract Study question Can differences in the live birth rate (LBR) between clinics with similar standard operating procedures (SOPs) be explained by variations in socioeconomic deprivation? Summary answer Socioeconomic deprivation does not appear to explain differences in LBR between clinics with similar SOPs in this cohort What is known already IVF success rates vary markedly between clinics. Numerous factors determine whether an IVF cycle is likely to be successful. It has been suggested that more socioeconomically deprived women are significantly less likely to achieve a live birth per cycle than less deprived women. In the UK, there is considerable variation in the levels of socioeconomic deprivation between different cities. Study design, size, duration We undertook a multi-center, retrospective review of prospectively collected data. We included all women undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle between January 2016 and December 2020 in eight different clinics belonging to the same IVF group. Clinics were located across England: three were situated in ‘very deprived’ cities, two in ‘predominantly affluent’ cities and the remaining cities were ‘neither very deprived nor very affluent’ i.e. their distribution was not skewed. Participants/materials, setting, methods We included all women undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle involving transfer of a single, fresh embryo. SOPs for medical and laboratory aspects of treatment were similar across all eight clinics. Socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) determined by the residential postcode of each woman undergoing treatment. Patients were categorized into quintiles according to IMD score. Live birth rates across IMD quintiles were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22. Main results and the role of chance In total, across the 8 clinics, 17171 women underwent an IVF/ICSI cycle. The LBR ranged from 17.9 - 35.7% (p < 0.001) with both upper and lower extremes in clinics in cities classified as ‘neither very deprived nor very affluent’. The overall LBR ranged from 23.7-26.0% across the IMD quintiles. This difference was neither linear nor statistically significant. Similar trends were noted whether the treatment was NHS (n = 4992) or self-funded (n = 12179). The proportion of women in each IMD quintile varied significantly (p < 0.001) across the different clinics: in the most deprived quintile this ranged from 3.2 - 22.8% and in the least deprived quintile this ranged from 19.1 - 30.8%. The LBR in each IMD quintile also varied significantly (p < 0.001) across the different clinics. The LBR in the most deprived quintile ranged from 7.1 - 46.1% and in the least deprived quintile ranged from 19.4 - 22.9%. Limitations, reasons for caution Our results require caution as the distribution of deprivation amongst women undergoing IVF was not representative of the cities in which clinics were located with a skew towards greater affluence seen. Further unknown variables appear responsible for the significant variation in LBRs between clinics rather than IMD categorization alone. Wider implications of the findings The distribution of deprivation amongst women undergoing IVF was not representative of the cities in which clinics were located. Whilst not unexpected due to the cost of IVF, ethical questions regarding access to fertility care are highlighted and efforts to promote inclusion should be prioritized. Trial registration number Not applicable

O020 Comparison of indices of deprivation and screening uptake within a local AAA screening programme

Abstract Introduction The NHS Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Programme (NAAASP) was established nationally to reduce the number of deaths caused by ruptured AAA. NAAASP invites all men in their 65th year for a simple abdominal ultrasound scan. Across the country uptake to the programme varies greatly. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of deprivation on local screening programme attendance. Methods The attendance for patients invited to screening within the Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland screening NAAASP programme between the years 2016 and 2021 was compared to indices of multiple deprivation (IMD) (derived from their Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA) for each patient). Multiple logistic regression was used to determine the most significant component contributing to the IMD score. Results 28,730 men in total were invited to attend. Mean IMD for those that attended screening was 15.6 versus 20.6 for non-attenders (P value <0.001). Multiple regression revealed the IMD domains most associated with non-attendance to screening to be; Health Deprivation and Disability domain (P<0.001), Outdoor living environment domain (P<0.001) and Adult skills and English language proficiency domain (P<0.001). Barriers to housing and service domain including ‘geographical barriers’ which relate to the physical proximity of local services and employment domains did not show any association with attendance. Conclusion In line with the contemporary medical literature, social deprivation affects the uptake of the local National Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Programme (NAAASP). Health deprivation and disability, Outdoor living environment and adult education domains are most contributory to non-attendance.

Use of historical remote monitoring data to determine predictors of CPAP non-compliance in patients with OSA.

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea. This study aimed to use complete usage data collected remotely from modern CPAP devices to identify compliance trends and clinical predictors of CPAP usage. Group usage data were analysed for a large cohort at a single tertiary sleep-centre before a detailed review of a 90-day reporting window for each patient was conducted. Individual data were collected for a smaller cohort of patients including demographics, past medical history and diagnostic sleep study results. A zero-inflated negative binomial regression model was used to determine associations between patient characteristics and usage days. Of 6450 patients who wereprescribed CPAP and included in the initial service analysis, 476 patients wereincluded in the sub-group. Complete usage data revealed that 46% of patients were fully compliant with CPAP therapy. Compliance fell from 55 to 46% by day 90 and remained at this rate going forward. Significant predictors of CPAP non-compliance included being in the lowest quartile of Index of Multiple Deprivation scores (most deprived) compared with the highest quartile (least deprived) (p = .005), and less severe oxygen desaturation index (ODI) on diagnosis (p = .03). Complete usage data show that compliance at day 90 appears to be a good indicator of future CPAP usage. Predictors of CPAP non-compliance may include lower socioeconomic status, and lower ODI.

Weighting of risk factors for low birth weight: a linked routine data cohort study in Wales, UK

ObjectiveGlobally, 20 million children are born with a birth weight below 2500 g every year, which is considered as a low birthweight (LBW) baby. This study investigates the contribution of...

Cross-sectional survey of child weight management service provision by acute NHS trusts across England in 2020/2021

ObjectiveWith one in five children in England living with obesity, we mapped the geographical distribution and format of child weight management services provided by acute National Health Service (NHS) trusts...

The influence of neighbourhood-level socioeconomic deprivation on developing type 2 diabetes in older men: a longitudinal analysis of the British Regional Heart Study cohort data

BackgroundEvidence from the British longitudinal studies on the influence of neighbourhood-level socioeconomic deprivation in older men on developing type 2 diabetes mellitus is scarce. This study investigates the prospective associations of neighbourhood-level deprivation and individual socioeconomic position with type 2 diabetes mellitus incidence in older men. MethodsThe British Regional Heart Study comprises a cohort of 4252 men aged 60–79 years in 1998–2000 from 24 towns across the UK. Neighbourhood-level deprivation was based on the country specific 2004–05 Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintiles for participants' postcode of residence at baseline. Individual socioeconomic position was defined as occupational social class based on longest-held occupation at recruitment. Participants with prevalent diabetes were excluded. The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus was ascertained from biannual reviews of primary care records over 18 years of follow-up. Cox proportional hazard models were undertaken to examine associations. FindingsThe incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus cases observed was 368 (9·9%), amongst the 3706 male participants. Age-adjusted rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus increased from IMD quintile 1 (least deprived) to quintile 4 (second most deprived), before decreasing in quintile 5. Compared with quintile 1, the age and individual social class adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) in quintile 4 was 1·52 (95% CI 1·09–2·13), remaining significant after further adjustments for obesity and family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Participants in the lowest social class had the highest rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The aHR by age and IMD scores for type 2 diabetes mellitus in the lowest social class compared with the highest social class was 2·12 (95% CI 1·15–3·89). InterpretationNeighbourhood-level and individual-level socioeconomic factors remain important predictors of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus in older men, demonstrating that inequalities persist in later life. Inequalities in diabetes and its underlying modifiable risk factors need to be addressed to reduce the burden of this disease in socioeconomically deprived older-age populations. FundingNone.

Socioeconomic deprivation: an important largely unrecognized risk factor in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Abstract Background Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Whether deprivation status should be incorporated in more cardiovascular risk estimation scores remains unclear. Purpose This study evaluates how socioeconomic deprivation status affects the performance of three primary prevention cardiovascular risk scores. Methods The Generation Scotland Scottish Family Health Study was used to evaluate the performance of three cardiovascular risk scores with (ASSIGN) and without (SCORE2, PCE) socioeconomic deprivation as a covariate in the risk prediction model. Deprivation was defined by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation score. The predicted 10-year risk was evaluated against the observed event rate for the cardiovascular outcome of each risk score. The comparison was made across three groups defined by the deprivation index score consisting of group 1 defined as most deprived, group 3 defined as least deprived and group 2 which consisted of individuals in the middle deprivation categories. Results The study population consisted of 15,506 individuals (60.0% female, median age of 51). Across the population 1,808 (12%) individuals were assigned to group 1 (most deprived), 8,119 (55%) to group 2, and 4,708 (32%) to group 3 (least deprived). Risk scores based on models that did not include deprivation status significantly under predicted risk in the most deprived (6.4% observed versus 4.6% predicted for SCORE2 and 6.7% observed versus 4.7% predicted for PCE, p<0.001 for both). Both risk scores also significantly overpredicted the risk in the least deprived group (4.0% observed versus 4.7% predicted for SCORE2, p=0.007 and 4.2% observed versus 4.9% predicted for PCE, p=0.028). In contrast, no significant difference was demonstrated in the observed versus predicted risk when using the ASSIGN risk score, which included socioeconomic deprivation status in the risk model. Conclusions Socioeconomic status is a largely unrecognized risk factor in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Risk scores that exclude socioeconomic deprivation as a covariate under- and overestimate the risk in the most and least deprived individuals, respectively. This study highlights the importance of incorporating socioeconomic deprivation status in risk estimation systems to ultimately reduce inequalities in health care provision for cardiovascular disease. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The British Heart Foundation.Health Data Research UK which receives its funding from HDR UK Ltd (HDR-5012) funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department of Health and Social Care (England), Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), British Heart Foundation and the Wellcome Trust.

An investigation of factors affecting changes in health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic in a UK population–based cohort study

ObjectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic has led to changes in behaviours, which may have different health effects in population subgroups. We investigated whether within-individual changes in health behaviours from before to during the pandemic differ by socio-economic deprivation, age or sex. Study designProspective cohort study. MethodsParticipants were recruited from the existing UK Fenland cohort study with measurements of health behaviours twice prepandemic (2005 to February 2020) and three times during the pandemic (July 2020 to April 2021). Health behaviours included daily servings of fruit and vegetables, units of alcohol consumed per week, smoking status, sleep duration and total and domain-specific physical activity energy expenditure. Sociodemographic information (English indices of multiple deprivation, education, occupation and ethnicity) and COVID-19 antibody status were also collected. Participants were grouped into three categories based on their English indices of multiple deprivation score: most, middle and least deprived. ResultsParticipants were included if they had completed at least one measurement during the pandemic and one prepandemic (n = 3212). Fruit and vegetable consumption, total physical activity energy expenditure and smoking prevalence decreased during the pandemic compared with prepandemic, whereas average sleep duration increased and alcohol consumption did not change. Decreases in fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity energy expenditure were most pronounced in the most deprived group compared with the least deprived group and were greater in women than men. ConclusionsSocio-economic inequalities in health behaviours have worsened during the pandemic. As the country emerges from the COVID-19 pandemic, strategies to reduce health inequalities need to be put at the forefront of recovery plans.

Linkage of historical GB Census data to present day population registers.

ObjectivesThis research links, for the first time, individual level entire GB population census data for 1851-1911 to present day individual level population registers. Precise georeferencing of individual records using AddressBase Premium and further linkage to Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMDs) enables family group analysis of inter-generational social mobility outcomes.
 ApproachPresent-day individual names and addresses taken from Electoral Registers and consumer data are georeferenced and linked to IMD data using AddressBase. This enables calculation of average IMD scores for every family group (surname). Individual level names and addresses from 1851-1911 censuses are assigned to harmonised historical parishes. The present day surname IMD scores are attributed to every resident in the historical censuses. Parish average ‘future IMD’ scores are calculated to show which areas have bequeathed the highest and lowest IMD scores on their residents’ descendants. This is a measure of how ‘north – south divides’ shape inter-generational social mobility.
 ResultsA linked data website, apps.cdrc.ac.uk/gbnames, profiles social mobility outcomes for 13,000+ family names, according to average neighbourhood quality experienced by family name bearers. There are clear and enduring regional divides in “future deprivation” inherited from ancestors by the present-day GB population. The research traces the origins of a north-south divide in England. Family roots in northern industrial cities are associated with unfavourable outcomes today. In Scotland, an east-west divide identifies eastern areas sharing similarly high levels of hardship to nineteenth-century industrial cities such as Liverpool and Manchester. Migration partially mitigates these inequalities, but most family groups remain concentrated in their ancestral heartlands, and continue to experience the long-term disadvantages bestowed by geographical location.
 ConclusionSurnames provide an under-exploited way of linking precisely georeferenced geographies of entire historical populations to their descendants today. Additional linkage to areal deprivation measures makes it possible to evaluate how social and spatial inequalities both endure and are promulgated through the generations. Geography is destiny for much of the population.

Describing the impact of community pharmacy organisation type on emergency hormonal contraception services in England.

In England, non-dispensing pharmacy services are commissioned either nationally or locally. For the national service Medicines Use Reviews (MURs), large multiple/chain pharmacies provide more consultations than independents. This study aimed to examine the relationship between community pharmacy organisation type and a local service, Emergency Hormonal Contraception (EHC). It also aimed to explore the influence of deprivation. Freedom of information requests was sent to all 147 local authorities in England. Data included the number of EHC consultations by individual pharmacies across England (2017/18). Public data were used to identify pharmacies, match with MUR data, and group by organisation type. Bivariate correlations and ANOVA described the relationship between service provision, organisation type and deprivation. Pharmacy data were obtained from 76 (52%) local authorities. Following removal of unidentifiable pharmacies, 3069 were analysed - 56% of the estimated 5461 commissioned pharmacies in England. Bivariate correlations indicated a significant negative correlation between EHC provision and Index of Multiple Deprivation score. Greater deprivation correlated to greater EHC provision. A One-way ANOVA demonstrated significant differences between organisation types for MUR provision (larger organisations providing greater volumes). EHC provision demonstrated significant differences between groups and a U-shaped association; large multiple and independent organisations had higher levels than medium and small chains. A two-way ANOVA showed no significant interaction between deprivation and organisation type. EHC provision does not increase linearly with organisation type. Deprivation appears a more reliable indicator of EHC provision. Provision is likely influenced by local factors but could increase with a nationally commissioned service.

Socioeconomic Deprivation: An Important, Largely Unrecognized Risk Factor in Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.

Background:Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Whether deprivation status should be incorporated in more cardiovascular risk estimation scores remains unclear. This study evaluates how socioeconomic deprivation status affects the performance of 3 primary prevention cardiovascular risk scores.Methods:The Generation Scotland Scottish Family Health Study was used to evaluate the performance of 3 cardiovascular risk scores with (ASSIGN [Assessing cardiovascular risk using SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) guidelines to ASSIGN preventive treatment]) and without (SCORE2 [Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 algorithm], Pooled Cohort Equations) socioeconomic deprivation as a covariate in the risk prediction model. Deprivation was defined by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation score. The predicted 10-year risk was evaluated against the observed event rate for the cardiovascular outcome of each risk score. The comparison was made across 3 groups defined by the deprivation index score consisting of group 1 defined as most deprived, group 3 defined as least deprived, and group 2, which consisted of individuals in the middle deprivation categories.Results:The study population consisted of 15 506 individuals (60.0% female, median age of 51). Across the population, 1808 (12%) individuals were assigned to group 1 (most deprived), 8119 (52%) to group 2, and 4708 (30%) to group 3 (least deprived), and 871 (6%) individuals had a missing deprivation score. Risk scores based on models that did not include deprivation status significantly under predicted risk in the most deprived (6.43% observed versus 4.63% predicted for SCORE2 [P=0.001] and 6.69% observed versus 4.66% predicted for Pooled Cohort Equations [P<0.001]). Both risk scores also significantly overpredicted the risk in the least deprived group (3.97% observed versus 4.72% predicted for SCORE2 [P=0.007] and 4.22% observed versus 4.85% predicted for Pooled Cohort Equations [P=0.028]). In contrast, no significant difference was demonstrated in the observed versus predicted risk when using the ASSIGN risk score, which included socioeconomic deprivation status in the risk model.Conclusions:Socioeconomic status is a largely unrecognized risk factor in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Risk scores that exclude socioeconomic deprivation as a covariate under- and overestimate the risk in the most and least deprived individuals, respectively. This study highlights the importance of incorporating socioeconomic deprivation status in risk estimation systems to ultimately reduce inequalities in health care provision for cardiovascular disease.

Effects of ethnicity and socioeconomic status on surgical outcomes from inflammatory bowel disease.

Evidence suggests that ethnicity and socioeconomic status of patients with chronic diseases influence their healthcare outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of these factors on the surgical outcome of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) over a 15-year period. A retrospective observational study investigated IBD patients operated on at an NHS Trust between 2000-2015, with follow-up data until 2020. Logistic regression models were used to determine the relationship between ethnic minority background and Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) on outcomes including requirement for intra-abdominal surgery, permanent stoma, re-do surgery and surgical complications, accounting for age, gender, smoking history and biologic treatment. There were 1,620 patients (56.7% ulcerative colitis (UC) and 43.3% Crohn's disease (CD)). Median age was 32years, and 49.6% were female. Patients with an ethnic minority background accounted for 20.6%. Within 5years of first presentation, 369 patients required intra-abdominal surgery, 95 permanent stomas and 107 re-do surgery. For CD patients, younger age at diagnosis, female patients, those with an ethnic minority background, higher IMD quintile, smoking history and biologic treatment were more likely to have intra-abdominal surgery. Ethnic minority background and higher IMD score were further associated with surgical complications for CD but not UC patients. Ethnic minority status and socioeconomic deprivation were associated with worse surgical outcomes within our cohort of IBD patients. These findings may stimulate discourse regarding the strategic planning of equitable healthcare services.

Peer-led physical activity intervention for girls aged 13 to 14 years: PLAN-A cluster RCT

Background Increasing physical activity among girls is a public health priority. Peers play a central role in influencing adolescent behaviour. Peer-led interventions may increase physical activity in adolescent girls, and a feasibility trial had shown that PLAN-A (Peer-led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls) had evidence of promise to increase physical activity in adolescent girls. Objective The objective was to test whether or not PLAN-A can increase adolescent girls’ physical activity, relative to usual practice, and be cost-effective. Design This was a two-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial, including an economic evaluation and a process evaluation. Participants State-funded secondary schools in the UK with girls in Year 9 (aged 13–14 years) participated in the trial. All Year 9 girls in participating schools were eligible. Randomisation Schools were the unit of allocation. They were randomised by an independent statistician, who was blinded to school identities, to the control or intervention arm, stratified by region and the England Index of Multiple Deprivation score. Intervention The intervention comprised peer nomination (i.e. identification of influential girls), train the trainers (i.e. training the instructors who delivered the intervention), peer supporter training (i.e. training the peer-nominated girls in techniques and strategies underpinned by motivational theory to support peer physical activity increases) and a 10-week diffusion period. Outcomes The primary outcome was accelerometer-assessed mean weekday minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity among Year 9 girls. The follow-up measures were conducted 5–6 months after the 10-week intervention, when the girls were in Year 10 (which was also 12 months after the baseline measures). Analysis used a multivariable, mixed-effects, linear regression model on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary outcomes included weekend moderate to vigorous physical activity, and weekday and weekend sedentary time. Intervention delivery costs were calculated for the economic evaluation. Results A total of 33 schools were approached; 20 schools and 1558 pupils consented. Pupils in the intervention arm had higher Index of Multiple Deprivation scores than pupils in the control arm. The numbers randomised were as follows: 10 schools (n = 758 pupils) were randomised to the intervention arm and 10 schools (n = 800 pupils) were randomised to the control arm. For analysis, a total of 1219 pupils provided valid weekday accelerometer data at both time points (intervention, n = 602; control, n = 617). The mean weekday moderate to vigorous physical activity was similar between groups at follow-up. The central estimate of time spent engaging in moderate to vigorous physical activity was 2.84 minutes lower in the intervention arm than in the control arm, after adjustment for baseline mean weekday moderate to vigorous physical activity, the number of valid days of data and the stratification variables; however, this difference was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval –5.94 to 0.25; p = 0.071). There were no between-arm differences in the secondary outcomes. The intervention costs ranged from £20.85 to £48.86 per pupil, with an average cost of £31.16. Harms None. Limitations The trial was limited to south-west England. Conclusions There was no evidence that PLAN-A increased physical activity in Year 9 girls compared with usual practice and, consequently, it was not cost-effective. Future work Future work should evaluate the utility of whole-school approaches to promote physical activity in schools. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN14539759. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 10, No. 6. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. This trial was designed and delivered in collaboration with the Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration (BRTC), a United Kingdom Clinical Research Commission (UKCRC)-registered Clinical Trials Unit that, as part of the Bristol Trials Centre, is in receipt of NIHR Clinical Trials Unit support funding. The sponsor of this trial was University of Bristol, Research and Enterprise Development www.bristol.ac.uk/red/. The costs of delivering the intervention were funded by Sport England.

The association between deprivation and the access to disease modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis: An England wide community-based study in the UK MS Register

BackgroundDeprivation can impact the access to health interventions in publicly funded health systems where cost is not the dominant barrier. In this study we examined whether deprivation affected the access to disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). MethodsAll English adults on the UK MS register with relapsing remitting MS who were diagnosed between 2010 and 2017, and after the age of 29 years were included. Deprivation was measured using postcode-based 2015 English index of multiple deprivation (IMD), which was divided into quintiles. ResultsA total of 1449 participants were eligible and 531/1449 (36.6%) received DMTs. Participants who lived in more deprived areas, based on their IMD scores, were significantly less likely to receive DMTs (odds ratio = 0.69, 95% Confidence interval = 0.49 to 0.98); barriers to housing and services contributed to this disparity. The Nagelkerke R2 value of these models showed that 2% of variation in accessing DMTs were dependant on deprivation. ConclusionsDeprivation, as measured by IMD, negatively influences the access to DMTs in England. Our findings also suggest that the lack of access to local MS DMT clinics in deprived areas may contribute to this disparity.