You have accessJournal of UrologyTransplantation & Vascular Surgery: Renal Transplantation, Vascular Surgery II1 Apr 20122279 PROSTATE VOLUME IS AN INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR FOR PROSTATE CANCER IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT PATIENTS Ioannis Antonopoulos, Affonso Piovesan, Hideki Kanashiro, Renato Falci, Fernando Saito, Gustavo Ebaid, and William Nahas Ioannis AntonopoulosIoannis Antonopoulos Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author , Affonso PiovesanAffonso Piovesan Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author , Hideki KanashiroHideki Kanashiro Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author , Renato FalciRenato Falci Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author , Fernando SaitoFernando Saito Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author , Gustavo EbaidGustavo Ebaid Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author , and William NahasWilliam Nahas Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2457AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The number of patients with prostate cancer (PC) following kidney transplant (KTX) has continuously increased in recent times. KTX patients are usually screened using the same methodology for the general population. Immunosuppression has a strong antiinflamatory effect in the prostate and could clear confounding factors like prostatitis in the prostate of KTX men. KTX men could benefit from different PC screening protocols than those used in the general population.To define the role of prostate volume as an independent risk factor for PC in KTX men. METHODS a prospective protocol was established to define if prostate volume could be a risk factor for PC in KTX men between 6/2004 and 6/2006. Immunosuppression was achieved with the triple-drug regimen of cyclosporine, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Ultrasound guided transrectal biopsy was indicated whenever PSA>2.5 and/or DRE was abnormal. Prostate volume was studied in both groups to verify if it could be an independent factor in selecting higher risk patients for prostate biopsy indication. The population consisted of 119 men (age 41 to 72, mean=51; PSA 0.2 to 7.3 mean=1.3; 12 cases had abnormal DRE). ROC curves were constructed for total PSA, DRE and prostate volume. RESULTS we found 7 tumors (5.9%). Gleason score varied between 6 and 8 (mean=6,7). Positive DRE findings yielded no significant results in PC diagnosis (Fisher's exact test, p>0.05). ROC curve constructed for prostate volume yielded a significant area under curve (AUC>0.7). The ideal cutoff for prostate volume in KTX men was established as 32.5g. CONCLUSIONS The prostate volume played a significant role possibly because of the strong anti-inflamatory effect of immunnossuppression. The prostate volume>32.5g should be used as a cutoff for biopsy indication when screening for prostate cancer in KTX men. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e919 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Ioannis Antonopoulos Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author Affonso Piovesan Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author Hideki Kanashiro Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author Renato Falci Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author Fernando Saito Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author Gustavo Ebaid Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author William Nahas Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract