Incremental Value For Diagnosis Research Articles

Layer-specific global longitudinal strain reveals impaired cardiac function in patients with reversible ischemia.

Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) detects early signs of left ventricular dysfunction; however, it is unknown whether layer-specific global longitudinal strain (GLS) has incremental value in diagnosis of patients with reversible ischemia assessed by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Eighty patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP), normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and no history of ischemic heart disease were retrospectively identified to have been examined by 2DSTE, SPECT, and coronary angiography (CAG). Patients with a normal SPECT constituted the control group, and patients with a positive SPECT were divided into patients with or without (true- or false- positive SPECT) significant stenosis assessed by CAG. GLS was measured for two myocardial layers (endocardial and epicardial) and as well as mid-myocardial GLS. Patients with reversible ischemia had significantly lower GLS compared to the control group (GLSEndocardial : -19.0±4.4% vs -21.4±3.7%, P=.011; GLSEpicardial : -14.3±2.9% vs -16.3±2.9%, P=.004); GLSMid-myocardial : -16.5±3.6% vs -18.6±3.2%, P=.006. This difference was even more evident in patients with a true-positive SPECT (GLSEndocardial : -18.0±4.4% vs -21.4±3.7%, P<.001; GLSEpicardial : -13.6±3.0% vs -16.3±2.9%, P<.001); GLSMid-myocardial : -15.6±3.6% vs -18.6±3.2%, P<.001. Notably, no significant differences existed in patients with a false-positive SPECT. GLSEpicardial was the only independent predictor of coronary artery disease. In patients with SAP and preserved LVEF, layer-specific GLS at rest identifies patients with reversible ischemia. This seems to be evident only in patients with a true-positive SPECT, thus, 2DSTE at rest might improve the diagnostic accuracy of a positive SPECT.

Can 18F-Fluoroestradiol Positron Emission Tomography Become a New Imaging Standard in the Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer Patient: A Prospective Comparative Study with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography?

Correct staging is the most crucial for the treatment outcome in cancer management. Molecular imaging with 18F-fluoroestradiol (FES) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) targets estrogen receptor (ER) and may have a higher incremental value in diagnosis by aiding specificity. We enrolled 12 female breast cancer patients prospectively and did 18F-FES PET-CT and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT within 1 week interval time. Lesion detection sensitivity was compared for a total number of lesions and for nonhepatic lesions only by McNemar test. 18F-FES PET-CT was taken as reference in case of indeterminate lesions. The incremental value reported by identifying 18F-FES exclusive lesions and by characterization of 18F-FDG indeterminate lesions. Spearman rank test was used to correlate ER expression and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Two ER-negative patients with no 18F-FES uptake were excluded. Ten ER-positive patients with 154 disease lesions were finally analyzed. 18F-FDG picked-up 142 lesions (sensitivity 92.21%), whereas 18F-FES picked-up 116 lesions (sensitivity 75.32%) and this difference was statistically significant. For nonhepatic lesions (n = 136) detectability, 18F-FDG picked-up 124 (sensitivity 91.18%), whereas 18F-FES picked-up 116 (sensitivity 85.29%) lesions and this difference was not statistically significant. Beside 12 exclusive lesions, 18F-FES characterized 41 (27.5%) 18F-FDG indeterminate lesions. Overall 18F-FES impacted 20% patient management. The positive trend was also seen with 18F-FES SUVmax with ER expression and negative with 18F-FDG SUVmax. We conclude, 18F-FDG has overall better sensitivity than 18F-FES PET-CT, however for nonhepatic metastasis difference was not significant. 18F-FES PET-CT better-characterized lesions and impacted 20% patient management. Therefore, 18F-FES PET-CT should be used with 18F-FDG PET-CT in strongly ER expressing patients for better specificity.

Feasibility and Diagnostic Potential of Pulmonary Transit Time Measurement by Contrast Echocardiography: A Pilot Study.

Pulmonary transit time (PTT; the time for ultrasound contrast to travel from the right ventricle [RV] to the left atrium) may provide a single metric that reports on cardiopulmonary function while overcoming some of the challenges of standard echocardiographic measures. We conducted a pilot study to test the feasibility and reproducibility of echocardiographically derived PTT and to determine its association with established measures of cardiopulmonary function. A total of 39 patients receiving clinically indicated ultrasound contrast were prospectively enrolled. PTT was measured in the apical four-chamber view using commercially available software. Reproducibility and inter-observer agreement were assessed in 9 patients. PTT was correlated with established measures of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, RV function, and pulmonary vascular status. PTT could be measured in 89% (33/37) of patients without a contraindication to ultrasound contrast; all measurements from the last 20 patients were interpretable and obtained independently by a sonographer. Reproducibility and inter-observer agreement were excellent. PTT correlated well with standard echocardiographic indicators of cardiac status. A PTT >4.5 seconds accurately identified all but 1 patient with cardiopulmonary dysfunction. This pilot study demonstrates that measurement of PTT using ultrasound contrast is highly reproducible, accurately reflects global cardiopulmonary function across a range of cardiopulmonary disease, and can be readily obtained by an independent sonographer. Further studies are needed to determine whether PTT has incremental value in diagnosis and prognosis compared to conventional echocardiographic parameters.