BackgroundEbola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreaks primarily occur in the HIV endemic setting of Sub-Saharan Africa. Transient increases in HIV viral load (VL), or blips, have been described following routine vaccinations. We characterized VL blips among PLWH enrolled in a phase 2 trial of a heterologous two-dose EVD vaccine.MethodsIn EBL2003, adult participants with and without HIV were randomized 1:4 to receive placebo or vaccine. Part A in the US studied MVA-BN-Filo followed by Ad26.ZEBOV 14 days later. Part B in Africa evaluated this MVA/Ad26 regimen and also a schedule of Ad26.ZEBOV followed by MVA-BN-Filo 29 days later. VL was assessed at screening, pre-vaccination, and 21, 42, 180, and 365 days post dose 2. Participants with VL < 20 copies/mL at the first 2 visits who received both doses and had complete VL data through 42 days post dose 2 were evaluated. Blips were defined as a post-injection VL ≥ 20 copies/mL no later than 42 days post dose 2, with subsequent return to VL < 20 copies/mL.ResultsA total of 277 PLWH on antiretroviral therapy (ART) were assessed; 73.3% (203) had baseline virologic suppression, and 89.2% (181) of those received both doses with complete VL data for inclusion in the analysis. Overall, 19.9% (36) experienced blips: 20.0% (29) of vaccinees vs 19.4% (7) of placebo recipients (p=1.0). All baseline suppressed participants with post-injection viremia subsequently regained suppression. Among vaccinees, the mean blip VL was 192 copies/mL, and the mean blip duration was 56 days, which was not significantly different from placebo. Of all blips, only 2 were > 1,000 copies/mL. Blips occurred in 24.0% (25) of Ad26/MVA recipients, and 9.7% (4) of MVA/Ad26 recipients (p=0.07). A dose of Ad26 was associated with a blip in 6.9% (10) of recipients vs 13.1% (19) for MVA recipients (p=0.12). Regardless of regimen, dose 1 was associated with a blip in 8.3% (12) of vaccinees, compared to 11.7% (17) of vaccinees for dose 2 (p=0.43).ConclusionAmong successfully treated PLWH, we observed low magnitude post-dose HIV blips that were not more common in vaccine vs. placebo recipients and did not result in loss of virologic suppression. This data is favorable for the deployment of the EVD vaccines in this trial in areas of high HIV endemicity.Disclosures Benjamin L. Custer, M.D., Alexion Pharmaceuticals (Shareholder)Armata Pharmaceuticals (Shareholder)Biomarin Pharmaceutical (Shareholder)Crispr Therapeutics (Shareholder)CVS Health Corp (Shareholder)Editas Medicine (Shareholder)Gilead (Shareholder)Glaxo Smith Kline (Shareholder)Hologic Inc (Shareholder)Merck (Shareholder)Mesoblast LTD (Shareholder)Pfizer (Shareholder)Sanofi (Shareholder)Unitedhealth Group (Shareholder)Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Shareholder) Georgi Shukarev, MD, Janssen (Employee) Auguste Gaddah, PhD, Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V (Employee) Kerstin Luhn, PhD, Janssen Vaccines and Prevention (Employee, Shareholder) Macaya Douoguih, MD, MPH, Janssen (Employee) Cynthia Robinson, MD, Janssen Vaccines (Employee)
Read full abstract