Increase In Trabecular Bone Score Research Articles

#2793 Improvement of bone mineral density in kidney transplant recipients: it is just denosumab?

Abstract Background and Aims Post-transplant bone disease is a common complication after a kidney transplant. Several factors, including pre-existing CKD-MBD, steroid, and CNI immunosuppressive treatment, contribute to this condition and increase the risk of bone loss and fractures. Among various therapeutic strategies, Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody against RANK-L, can decrease the risk of fracture in Kidney Transplant Recipients (KTRs). The most reported side effects are episodes of hypocalcemia, which are associated with an increase in parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. The FDA recommends treating these episodes with calcium supplements and cholecalciferol; another alternative is the use of receptor activators (VDRa). To our knowledge, there are only a few case reports in the literature analyzing the effect of combined treatment with VDRa and Denosumab. In this observational study, we evaluated changes in laboratory data and bone density (BMD) assessed by DXA in KTRs that received Denosumab with or without VDRa supplementation. Method This retrospective study evaluated 18 kidney transplant recipients who started Denosumab therapy after transplantation. The patients were divided into two groups: those who started or increased vitamin D receptor agonist therapy within the first 6 months before the second dose of Denosumab, and those who did not. We analyzed at baseline (T0) and after 1 year from first Denosumab administration (T1) creatinine, calcium, phosphate, PTH, bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP), osteocalcin (OC), carboxy-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type 1 collagen (CTX), and 25-OH vitamin D and BMD at vertebral lumbar spine, femoral neck and total Hip. Furthermore, we evaluated Trabecular Bone Score (TBS). We performed ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis for continuous variables based on distribution and Fisher's test for categorical variables. To assess the correlation between variables, we used linear regression and the Pearson correlation coefficient. Additionally, we conducted logistic regression to analyze the outcomes. Results A total of 18 patients were included in the study cohort. Of these, 66.7% were females, and 33.3% were males, with an average age of 67 years (Table 1). 13 patients started or uptitrated VDRa within the first 6 months (VDRa group), while 5 did not (Control group). At baseline, the VDRa group had a lower eGFR and higher PTH compared to the Control group, although both were at the threshold of statistical significance (37.38 vs 52.20 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.060 and 106.77 vs 72.60 pg/mL, p = 0.069). However, they had significantly lower serum calcium levels (8.96 vs 9.90 mg/dL, p = 0.039). In terms of baseline bone structure, there were no significant differences between the two groups at any of the three sites examined. At 1 year the VDRa group had a significantly greater gain at the Total Hip (+0.08 vs −0.03 g/cm3, p = 0.048 and +10.81 vs −4.16%, p = 0.037). Additionally, the VDRa group had an increase in TBS, while the Control group had a reduction, and this absolute and percentage variation between the two was statistically significant (+0.07 vs −0.02, p = 0.034 and +6.14 vs −1.62, p = 0.043) (Table 2). In linear correlation analysis higher doses of VDRa were significantly and positively associated with Delta BMD at the Total Hip (r = 0.65, p = 0.003). However, a significant correlation was highlighted between VDRa dosage and PTH reduction (r = −0.51, p = 0.027). Finally, in univariate logistic regression analysis, the dosage of VDRA was significantly and positively associated with 5% BMD gain at the Total Hip (OR = 1.54, CI 1.08 to 1.89, p = 0.046) (Fig. 1). Conclusion After conducting our study, we found that the use of Denosumab had a positive impact on bone mineral density. In addition to that, we observed that the association with VDRa led to further improvement in BMD and better control of PTH. Despite having a small sample size, our study demonstrates that VDRa not only helps in correcting hypocalcemia but also enhances the effect of Denosumab.

Vertebral fractures, trabecular bone score and their determinants in chronic hypoparathyroidism.

Patients with hypoparathyroidism are at risk of vertebral fractures (VFs) despite high bone mineral density (BMD). We investigated this paradox by assessing trabecular bone score (TBS) and hip structural analysis (HSA) in non-surgical chronic hypoparathyroidism (cHypoPT) with and without VFs. 152 cHypoPT patients (age 40.2 ± 13.4years, M: F = 81:71) with a median follow-up of 8 (2-13) years were assessed for BMD, VFs, TBS, and HSA and compared with 152 healthy controls. VFs at T7-L4 were assessed by Genant's method. Average serum total calcium and phosphorus during follow-up were assessed. The lumbar spine and hip BMD were higher by 25.4 and 13.4% in cHypoPT than controls (P < 0.001). Paradoxically, VFs (30.9 vs.7.9%), including multiple (12.5 vs. 2.6%) were higher in cHypoPT (P < 0.001). Though overall average TBS (1.411 ± 0.091) was normal in cHypoPT, 25.4% of the females had subnormal TBS, more in post than pre-menopausal women (52.3 vs. 14%, P = 0.002) and as compared to males (6.1%, P = 0.001). TBS correlated with menopausal status and follow-up serum calcium-phosphorus product. For every gm/cm2 rise in BMD, TBS increase was only 0.227 in cHypoPT compared to 0.513 in controls. Frequency of VFs increased with declining TBS (P = 0.004). HSA was comparable between cHypoPT with and without VFs. 23.4% of cHypoPT with VFs had subnormal TBS. 31% of cHypoPT patients had VFs. TBS indicated degraded bone microarchitecture in 50% of the post-menopausal cHypoPT women. However, TBS has limitations to detect abnormal bone microarchitecture in cHypoPT as only one-fourth of patients with VFs showed low TBS.

Effect of Romosozumab on Trabecular Bone Score Compared to Anti-Resorptive Agents in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis.

BackgroundRomosozumab has shown significant improvement in bone mineral density (BMD) in previously reported trials. However, BMD reflects only bone strength and does not offer insight into the bone microarchitecture. The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a non-invasive tool used to assess bone microarchitecture. Several previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of anti-osteoporotic agents using the TBS. However, data regarding the potency of romosozumab based on the TBS is lacking. This retrospective observational cohort study demonstrated the impact of romosozumab use on the TBS.MethodsThe primary outcome was the percentage change in the TBS from baseline to post-treatment. Postmenopausal osteoporosis patients were followed up for 6 and 12 months after romosozumab (210 mg monthly, N =10) and denosumab (60 mg every 6 months, N=21) or ibandronate (150 mg monthly, N=24) treatments, respectively. Patients who had previously used osteoporosis medications were included, if any the washout period was sufficient.ResultsThe percentage change in TBS from baseline to post-treatment was 2.53±2.98% (6 months, N=10; P=0.04), 0.59%±3.26% (12 months, N=21; P=0.48), and −0.45±3.66% (12 months, N=24; P=0.51) in the romosozumab, denosumab, and ibandronate groups, respectively. Romosozumab demonstrated a noticeable increase in TBS, although it did not reach the least significant change (5.8%) in TBS.ConclusionsRomosozumab improved the TBS in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. TBS may be potentially useful for monitoring romosozumab treatment.

Impact of bone-active drugs and underlying disease on bone health after lung transplantation: A longitudinal study

Introductionthe effect of bone-active drugs on the risk of fragility fractures (Fx), bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) changes in patients receiving lung transplantation (LTx) is largely unknown. This study assessed the bone-active drugs effect in patients undergoing LTx both with (CF) and without (nCF) cystic-fibrosis. MethodsWe evaluated incident Fx, both clinical and morphometric vertebral Fx by spinal X-ray, BMD and trabecular bone score (TBS) in 117 patients (CF=50, nCF n = 67) before and 24-months after LTx. A bone-active therapy was proposed to all LTx candidates. Results83.8% of patients started a bone-active drug. Lumbar-spine (LS) T-score improved significantly only in treated patients (-1.4 ± 1.0 vs -2.0±1.0, p = 0.0001), whereas femur BMD and TBS remained stable in treated and not treated subjects. The rate of incident Fx was 15.3%, with no difference between treated and not treated patients. After LTx, LS T-score improved significantly only in nCF group (-1.3 ± 1.0 vs -1.8 ± 1.1, p = 0.0001), while femur remained stable in both nCF and CF groups. Patients with CF showed a significant Z-TBS increase (-3.6 ± 1.7 vs -3.0 ± 1.7, p = 0.019) and a lower Fx incidence as compared with nCF patients (4.1% vs 24.2%, p =0.003). Incident Fx were associated with nCF diagnosis (OR 7.300, CI95% 1.385–38.461, p = 0.019) regardless of prevalent Fx, previous glucocorticoid therapy and bone-active therapy introduced at least 6 months before LTx. ConclusionsA prompt medical intervention helps in preventing BMD loss after LTx. As compared with nCF patients, CF patients show a TBS increase and a lower Fx risk after LTx.

Effects of age at estrogen replacement therapy initiation on trabecular bone score in Japanese adults with Turner syndrome.

Studies have reported associations between bone mineral density and estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in Turner syndrome (TS) patients; however, few studies exist on the effect on bone quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the age at ERT initiation on bone quality of Japanese TS patients, cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Cross-sectionally, 95 TS patients were divided into three groups based on their age at initiation of ERT: A (12-14 years, 11 patients), B (15-17 years, 47 patients), and C (over 18 years, 37 patients). To assess bone quality, trabecular bone score (TBS) was used. The effects of age at initiation and duration of ERT on TBS were examined using multiple regression analysis. In the longitudinal study, 48 patients who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry multiple times were divided into three groups: D (12-14 years, 8 patients), E (15-17 years, 18 patients), and F (over 18 years, 22 patients). Each group was analyzed for the rate of change in TBS per year. Cross-sectionally, the TBS showed significant differences among the three groups (TBS A, 1.302; B, 1.299; C, 1.245) (p = 0.013); group C was significantly lower than B (p = 0.014); bone quality was degraded. Multiple regression analysis revealed that age at ERT initiation significantly affected the increase in TBS (p = 0.002). Longitudinally, the rate of change of TBS was not significantly different in the three groups (p = 0.73). Early initiation of ERT may have positive effects on bone quality in TS. Large prospective studies will be needed.

Effect of denosumab on trabecular bone score in de novo kidney transplant recipients.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are at risk to lose bone mass. The trabecular bone score (TBS) represents a recently developed parameter of lumbar spine trabecular bone texture that correlates with the occurrence of fractures. We analysed the 1-year changes in TBS in 44 de novo KTR that were randomized 1:1 to denosumab or no treatment. TBS was derived from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and was correlated with 1-year areal bone mineral density (aBMD) changes at the lumbar spine and total hip. Correlations were also performed with parameters of peripheral bone microarchitecture and bone strength at the distal tibia and distal radius, as assessed by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) and micro-finite element analysis. The baseline TBS in KTR amounted to 1.312 ± 0.101, which is lower than the TBS of an age-matched normal control population (range 1.364-1.471). The TBS correlated positively with aBMD at the lumbar spine (Spearman's ρ = 0.56; P < 0.001) and total hip (ρ = 0.33; P < 0.05). The baseline TBS also correlated with HRpQCT-derived total (ρ = 0.49; P < 0.05) and trabecular volumetric BMD (ρ = 0.57; P < 0.01) and trabecular separation (ρ = -0.46; P < 0.05) at the tibia. Denosumab treatment led to an increase in TBS, paralleling the BMD changes at the lumbar spine. The TBS is a useful additional score of bone health, which may help to better define fracture risk. Treatment with denosumab led to improved trabecular bone texture in de novo KTR in addition to its beneficial effect on BMD.

Trabecular Bone Score, Bone Mineral Density and Bone Markers in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism 2 Years After Parathyroidectomy.

Following a parathyroidectomy there is a bone mineral density (BMD) improvement in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. However, data of bone microarchitecture are scarce. Trabecular bone score (TBS) estimates bone microarchitecture and could provide valuable information in those patients. The aim of this study is to assess TBS changes 2 years after successful surgery in a group of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and correlate these results with changes in BMD and bone turnover markers. This is a prospective study including 32 patients. In all participants BMD and TBS were measured, before and 24 months after surgery. Biochemical data: serum calcium, PTH, 25-OH-vitamin D, beta-crosslaps, bone alkaline phosphatase, and osteocalcin. 25 female and 7 male patients, mean age 64.6±12.4 years, were included in the study. At baseline, BMD was low at: lumbar spine (T-score -2.19±1.31), total hip (-1.33±1.12), femoral neck (-1.75±0.84), and distal one-third radius (-2.74±1.68). Baseline TBS showed partially degraded microarchitecture (1.180±0.130). After parathyroidectomy lumbar spine BMD increased significantly (5.3±13.0%, p<0.05), as well as total hip (3.8±8.8%, p<0.05). There was an increase in TBS, but this was not significant. There was a correlation between TBS and BAP at baseline (rs=0.73; p<0.01) and TBS and BAP 2 years after surgery (rs=0.57, p<0.05). Although bone density improves 2 years after surgery in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and there is a restoration of bone turnover markers, TBS is not completely restored. These results remark the necessity of longer periods of study, to confirm if bone microarchitecture could be completely restored after surgery.

Biologic treatment in comparison to methotrexate has positive effect on trabecular bone score in rheumatoid arthritis patients: 1-year follow-up

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Biologic treatment may influence activity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as well as areal bone mineral density (aBMD). Decreased aBMD explains the fracture risk in RA patients only partially. The trabecular bone score (TBS), novel texture parameter reflects degradation of trabecular bone and therefore could be used as a further parameter to predict the risk of fragility fracture.Objective: To compare the effects of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate) on aBMD and TBS in patients suffering from active RA.Methods: A 12 month prospective trial was performed in 105 active RA patients. The cohort was divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 84, mean age 54 yrs) treated with bDMARDs and group 2 (n = 21, mean age 53 yrs) treated with csDMARDs. The mean daily dose of prednisone at baseline was 6.2 and 6.6 mg (NS) between group 1 and 2, respectively. Patients with anti-osteoporotic treatment were not included. All patients received calcium (600 mg) and cholecalciferol (800IU). Lumbar spine (LS) and FN aBMD (by DXA, Hologic) were measured at baseline and after 1 year of treatment. TBS was generated using TBS Insight software (Medimaps, Switzerland).Results: Treatment with bDMARDS led to decrease in mean prednisone dose and to increase of 1.7% (p < 0.05) in TBS and OC levels of 26% (p < 0.001) but not on aBMD and CTX after treatment. The greatest TBS increase (2.7%, p < 0.05) was observed in premenopausal females within group 1. No effect of csDMARDS on measured parameters was observed.Conclusion: Treatment of patients suffering from active RA with bDMARDs in comparison to csDMARDS led to increase of TBS, with greater increment of TBS in premenopausal women, despite no change in aBMD.

Abaloparatide-SC improves trabecular microarchitecture as assessed by trabecular bone score (TBS): a 24-week randomized clinical trial

SummaryIn a phase 2 trial of 222 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis aged 55 to 85 years randomized to one of three different doses of abaloparatide-SC, subcutaneous teriparatide, or placebo for 24 weeks, abaloparatide-SC resulted in improvements in skeletal microarchitecture as measured by the trabecular bone score.IntroductionSubcutaneous abaloparatide (abaloparatide-SC) increases total hip and lumbar spine bone mineral density and reduces vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. In this study, we analyzed the extent to which abaloparatide-SC improves skeletal microarchitecture, assessed indirectly by trabecular bone score (TBS).MethodsThis is a post hoc analysis of a phase 2 trial of 222 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis aged 55 to 85 years randomized to abaloparatide-SC (20, 40, or 80 μg), subcutaneous teriparatide (20 μg), or placebo for 24 weeks. TBS was measured from lumbar spine dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images in 138 women for whom the DXA device was TBS software compatible. Assessments were made at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. Between-group differences were assessed by generalized estimating equations adjusted for relevant baseline characteristics, and a pre-determined least significant change analysis was performed.ResultsAfter 24 weeks, TBS increased significantly by 2.27, 3.14, and 4.21% versus baseline in participants on 20, 40, and 80 μg abaloparatide-SC daily, respectively, and by 2.21% in those on teriparatide (p < 0.05 for each). The TBS in the placebo group declined by 1.08%. The TBS increase in each treatment group was significantly higher than placebo at 24 weeks (p < 0.0001 for each) after adjustment for age, BMI, and baseline TBS. A dose-response was observed at 24 weeks across the three doses of abaloparatide-SC and placebo (p = 0.02). The increase in TBS in the abaloparatide-SC 80 μg group was significantly greater than TPTD (p < 0.03).ConclusionsThese results are consistent with an effect of abaloparatide-SC to improve lumbar spine skeletal microarchitecture, as assessed by TBS.

Predictors of change of trabecular bone score (TBS) in older men: results from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.

Our objective was to compare and contrast predictors of changes in TBS, total hip BMD, and lumbar spine BMD. Our study population was 3969 Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) cohort participants (mean age 72.8years) with repeat measures of TBS, lumbar spine and total hip BMD, body mass index (BMI) less than 37kg/m2, and no use of bisphosphonate or glucocorticoid medications. TBS was scored (Med-Imaps Software version 2.1) and BMD measured on Hologic densitometers. One thousand four hundred forty-four men had a TBS decrease >0.04units (estimated least significant change for TBS), 795 men had a TBS increase >0.04units, and 1730 men had TBS change ≤0.04units over mean follow-up of 4.6years. Older age was not associated with TBS change, but was associated with greater decline in lumbar spine and total hip BMD. Compared to stable weight, >10% weight loss was strongly associated with an increase in TBS [effect size =1.24 (95% CI 1.12, 1.36)] and strongly associated with a decrease in total hip BMD [-1.16 (95% CI -1.19, -1.03)]. Other predictors discordant for longitudinal changes of TBS and BMD included baseline BMI, walk speed, and ACE inhibitor use. Predictors of changes in TBS are different from predictors of changes in lumbar spine and total hip BMD. At least when assessed on Hologic densitometers, weight loss is associated with subsequent declines in spine and total hip BMD but subsequent increase in TBS. Faster walk speed may protect against loss of hip BMD, but is not associated with longitudinal changes of TBS.

Maternal vitamin D and offspring trabecular bone score.

Trabecular bone score (TBS), a novel tool derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), reflects the microarchitecture of the vertebrae. It has been shown to predict fracture independent of standard DXA parameters in adult populations. Previously, we demonstrated that maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) during pregnancy is associated with offspring bone mineral content at age 11years. However, associations with TBS have not been explored, thus we aimed to determine associations between maternal 25(OH)D and offspring TBS. Data were collected from the Vitamin D in Pregnancy (VIP) study. Venous blood samples were taken at recruitment and at 28-32weeks' gestation. Maternal 25(OH)D was measured by radioimmunoassay. Offspring (n=195, n=181 with complete measures) underwent spine DXA (GE Lunar), at age 11years (median=10.9 (IQR 10.9-11.4)). TBS was calculated using TBS iNsight software. Offspring of mothers with sufficient 25(OH)D levels (≥50nmol/L) at recruitment had a higher TBS (1.363 vs. 1.340, p=0.04). In multivariable linear regression models, after adjustment for child relative lean mass, sex and pubertal stage, a 10nmol/L increase in maternal 25(OH)D was associated with a 0.005 (95% CI 0.000, 0.010, p=0.04) increase in TBS. However when stratified by sex (p for interaction=0.16), the association was significant in boys, but not girls. There were no associations with TBS and maternal 25(OH)D at 28-32weeks. We speculate that maternal 25(OH)D in early pregnancy may be associated with TBS in offspring at age 11 in boys. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant confirmation with larger interventional and long-term follow-up studies.

Assessment of the effects of switching oral bisphosphonates to denosumab or daily teriparatide in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

The aim of this observational, non-randomized study was to clarify the unknown effects of switching oral bisphosphonates (BPs) to denosumab (DMAb) or daily teriparatide (TPTD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The characteristics of the 194 female patients included in the study were 183 postmenopausal, age 65.9years, lumbar spine (LS) T score -1.8, femoral neck (FN) T score -2.3, dose and rate of taking oral prednisolone (3.6mg/day) 75.8%, and prior BP treatment duration 40.0months. The patients were allocated to (1) the BP-continue group (n=80), (2) the switch-to-DMAb group (n=74), or (3) the switch-to-TPTD group (n=40). After 18months, the increase in bone mineral density (BMD) was significantly greater in the switch-to-DMAb group than in the BP-continue group (LS 5.2 vs 2.3%, P<0.01; FN 3.8 vs 0.0%, P<0.01) and in the switch-to-TPTD group than in the BP-continue group (LS 9.0 vs 2.3%, P<0.001; FN 4.9 vs 0.0%, P<0.01). Moreover, the switch-to-TPTD group showed a higher LS BMD (P<0.05) and trabecular bone score (TBS) (2.1 vs -0.7%; P<0.05) increase than the switch-to-DMAb group. Clinical fracture incidence during this period was 8.8% in the BP-continue group, 4.1% in the switch-to-DMAb group, and 2.5% in the switch-to-TPTD group. Both the switch-to-DMAb group and the switch-to-TPTD group showed significant increases in LS and FN BMD, and the switch-to-TPTD group showed a higher increase in TBS compared to the BP-continue group at 18months. Switching BPs to DMAb or TPTD in female RA may provide some useful osteoporosis treatment options.

Spine Trabecular Bone Score as an Indicator of Bone Microarchitecture at the Peripheral Skeleton in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Studies using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography showed progressive abnormalities in cortical and trabecular microarchitecture and biomechanical competence over the first year after kidney transplantation. However, high-resolution peripheral computed tomography is a research tool lacking wide availability. In contrast, the trabecular bone score is a novel and widely available tool that uses gray-scale variograms of the spine image from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to assess trabecular quality. There are no studies assessing whether trabecular bone score characterizes bone quality in kidney transplant recipients. Between 2009 and 2010, we conducted a study to assess changes in peripheral skeletal microarchitecture, measured by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography, during the first year after transplantation in 47 patients managed with early corticosteroid-withdrawal immunosuppression. All adult first-time transplant candidates were eligible. Patients underwent imaging with high-resolution peripheral computed tomography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry pretransplantation and 3, 6, and 12 months post-transplantation. We now test if, during the first year after transplantation, trabecular bone score assesses the evolution of bone microarchitecture and biomechanical competence as determined by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography. At baseline and follow-up, among the 72% and 78%, respectively, of patients having normal bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, 53% and 50%, respectively, were classified by trabecular bone score as having high fracture risk. At baseline, trabecular bone score correlated with spine, hip, and ultradistal radius bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and cortical area, density, thickness, and porosity; trabecular density, thickness, separation, and heterogeneity; and stiffness and failure load by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography. Longitudinally, each percentage increase in trabecular bone score was associated with increases in trabecular number (0.35%±1.4%); decreases in trabecular thickness (-0.45%±0.15%), separation (-0.40%±0.15%), and network heterogeneity (-0.48%±0.20%); and increases in failure load (0.22%±0.09%) by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography (all P<0.05). Trabecular bone score may be a useful method to assess and monitor bone quality and strength and classify fracture risk in kidney transplant recipients.

Longitudinal Change in Trabecular Bone Score during and after Treatment of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Korean Women.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the longitudinal changes of trabecular bone score (TBS) during and after bisphosphonate (BP) treatment in postmenopausal Korean women with osteoporosis.MethodsWe analyzed 191 patients who took BP and underwent bone mineral density (BMD) test for the period from January 2010 to December 2015. The mean follow up period during treatment and after treatment was 22.8 months and 18 months, respectively. The TBS and BMD values were evaluated by the percent changes relative to the baseline.ResultsIn 191 patients, who treated with BPs, L-spine BMD increased 3.65±0.5% and TBS increased 0.26±0.4% from baseline during first 1 year. At 2 to 4 years, the changes of BMD and TBS from baseline gradually increased up to 9.3±3.25% and 2.69±0.98% and both results showed statistically significant correlation. In 86 patients who stopped BPs, L-spine BMD decreased -0.54±1.07% and TBS increased 0.33±1.96% from baseline during 3 years follow up period.ConclusionsLumbar spine TBS increase over time with BPs treatment although the changes were less than that of BMD. Also, it preserve for years after stopping treatment, as the changes of lumbar spine BMD. The results of BMD and TBS showed significant correlation during treatment but not during drug withdrawal.

Skeletal changes after restoration of the euparathyroid state in patients with hypoparathyroidism and primary hyperparathyroidism.

Restoration of the euparathyroid state is associated with improvement of bone dynamics both in hypoparathyroidism and primary hyperparathyroidism. To date, no study has directly compared these two groups following correction of parathyroid hormone excess or deficiency. The study was designed to investigate changes in bone mineral density and trabecular bone score with restoration of the euparathyroid state by parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism or recombinant parathyroid hormone [rhPTH(1-84)] replacement in hypoparathyroidism. This was a 2-year prospective intervention study in which we evaluated areal bone mineral density by DXA and trabecular bone score in 52 hypoparathyroid patients on rhPTH(1-84) replacement and 27 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent parathyroidectomy. We evaluated changes in areal bone mineral density by DXA and trabecular bone score at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. After parathyroidectomy, areal bone mineral density increased from baseline at the lumbar spine and total hip at 6 months and at the femoral neck at 12 months, while there were no changes at the distal 1/3 radius. Treatment with rhPTH(1-84) was associated with significant increases in lumbar spine and decreases in distal 1/3 radius areal bone mineral density by 18 months in hypoparathyroid patients. At this time point, hypoparathyroid subjects demonstrated a significant increase in trabecular bone score from baseline, while there were no significant changes in trabecular bone score following parathyroidectomy. Bone mineral density increases both with administration of parathyroid hormone in a state of parathyroid hormone deficiency or removal of parathyroid hormone in a state of parathyroid hormone excess. However, only hypoparathyroid patients on rhPTH(1-84) appeared to have improvements in micro-architectural pattern as assessed by trabecular bone score.

Evaluation of bone quality, measured by trabecular bone score in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism

Introduction. Evaluation of bone quality represents a clinical challenge. Analysis of bone mineral density (BMD) provides useful, but incomplete, information, and new tools are needed. Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) is emerging as a new surrogate marker of bone texture and microarchitecture and, may, therefore, be useful to potentially evaluate the risk of osteoporosis.Materials and methods. Retrospective study of 18 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Clinical, analytical and BMD data were collected form clinical records. TBS was calculated by reevaluating the already existing BMD images. Patients were classified into two different groups according to their treatment: 1) 10 patients who underwent surgery, in whom TBS was evaluated before (B-S) and after surgery (A-S), and 2) 8 patients who received standard medical treatment, in whom TBS was evaluated with a time-lapse of one year.Results. Basal age, body mass index (BMI), serum calcium, PTH and vitamin 25-OH-D levels, and T-Scores were not significantly different between the two groups. We observed a significant improvement of TBS one year after surgery in the first group (TBS B-S 1.24±0.13 vs TBS A-S 1.29±0.11,p=0.03). A subtle deterioration on TBS was observed one year after standard treatment in the second group (1.25±0.7 vs 1.22±0.7, p=0.29). Overall, surgical patients experienced a TBS increase 4.2%, whilst a decrease of 1.6% was observed in the second group (p=0.026)Conclusion. Bone microarchitecture, measured by TBS, improves after surgery in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. This parameter seems promising in the evaluation of bone status in primary hyperparathyroidism. Larger and longer follow-up studies deem necessary to better evaluate the potential utilities of using TBS in the assessment of bone quality.

Comparison between different bone treatments on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and bone microarchitectural texture as assessed by the trabecular bone score (TBS)

PurposeThe objective of the study was to assess longitudinal effects of different osteoporosis treatments on TBS and aBMD at lumbar spine. MethodWe analyzed 390 patients (men: 72; women: 318; age>40years; mean follow-up of 20months and BMI<37kg/m2). We stratified the cohort by treatments: Naive of treatment (Naive, n=67), Calcium and Vitamin D (CaVitD, n=87), Testosterone (Te, n=36), Alendronate (AL, n=88), Risedronate (Ri, n=39), Denosumab (Dmb, n=43) and Teriparatide (PTH, n=30). The follow-up changes from baseline were normalized at 24months. ResultsAfter 24months, Naive group TBS decreased by 3.1% (p<0.05) whereas a non-significant increase was observed for spine aBMD (Δ=+0.5%). Compared to the Naive group, significant improvement (p<0.05) was observed in both TBS and aBMD for Te, AL, Ri, Dmb and PTH groups and in the CaVitD group for TBS. At the end of the follow-up, significant improvement have been observed for aBMD in Te (+4.4%), AL (+4.1%), Ri (+4.8), D (+8.8%) and PTH (+8.8%) groups. Significant improvement was observed only in the AL (+1.4%), Dmb (+2.8%) and PTH (+3.6%) groups for TBS. ConclusionAs expected, TBS of Naive subjects decreased with age. As expected a TBS preservation has been observed under AL and Ri. Te and CaVitD effects on TBS were evaluated for the first time: a similar preservation effect has been observed. A significant TBS increase was observed under Denosumab and PTH. TBS could be a useful tool to monitor treatment effects.

Impact of the growth hormone replacement on bone status in growth hormone deficient adults

IntroductionGrowth hormone deficiency (GHD) is associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD). GH replacement has positive effect on BMD but the magnitude of this effect and its mechanism are debated. ObjectivesThe objectives of this study was first, to assess the effect of GH replacement on BMD, and second, to evaluate the effect of GH treatment on bone turnover and microarchitecture and to assess the factors influencing the effect of the therapy on BMD. Patients and MethodsAdult GHD (AO-GHD) and childhood onset GHD (CO-GHD) patients treated with GH using IGF-I normalization GH replacement regimen were prospectively followed during 2years. Lumbar spine (L1–L4) and total femur BMD by Hologic discovery, in the subset of patients also bone turnover markers; osteocalcin and carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTx) were assessed at baseline and at months 3, 6, 12 and 24, respectively. The trabecular bone score (TBS) derived from lumbar spine DXA by the iNsight® software was assessed in a subset of study population at baseline and months 12 and 24. ResultsIn total, 147 GHD patients (age 35.1years, 84 males/63 females, 43 of childhood onset GHD/104 AO-GHD) were included. BMD of lumbar spine and femur increased significantly during the treatment (14% and 7% increase at 2years, respectively; p<0.0001).Bone markers increased during the first 12months of treatment with subsequent decrease of CTx. At month 24, significant increase in TBS was observed (4%, p=0.02).BMD increase was significantly higher in males (15% increase in males vs. 10% in females, p=0.037) and childhood onset GHD (CO-GHD) patients (13% increase in CO-GHD, p=0.004). ConclusionGH supplementation leads to an increase of BMD with corresponding changes in bone turnover markers and changes in microarchitecture as assessed by trabecular bone score. Positive effect of GH on bone status is more pronounced in males and CO-GHD adults.

Effects of anti-resorptive agents on trabecular bone score (TBS) in older women

We evaluated the longitudinal effects of anti-resorptive agents (534 treated women vs. 1,150 untreated) on lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS). TBS was responsive to treatment in women over age 50. The treatment-related increase in TBS was less than the increase in BMD, which is consistent with bone texture preservation. In addition to inducing an increase in BMD, anti-resorptive agents also help to preserve bone architecture. TBS, a new gray-level texture measurement, correlates with 3D parameters of bone micro-architecture independent of BMD. Our objective was to evaluate the longitudinal effects of anti-resorptive agents on lumbar spine BMD and TBS. Women (≥ 50 years), from the BMD program database for the province of Manitoba, Canada, who had not received any anti-resorptive drug prior to their initial dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) exam were divided into two groups: untreated, those without any anti-resorptive drug over the course of follow-up, and treated, those with a non-estrogen anti-resorptive drug (86 % bisphosphonates, 10 % raloxifene, and 4 % calcitonin). Lumbar spine TBS was calculated for each lumbar spine DXA examination. Changes in TBS and BMD between baseline and follow-up (mean follow-up 3.7 years), expressed in percentage per year, were compared between the two groups. A total of 1,150 untreated women and 534 treated women met the inclusion criteria. Only a weak correlation was seen between BMD and TBS in either group. Significant intergroup differences in BMD change and TBS change were observed over the course of follow-up (p < 0.001). Similar mean decreases in BMD and TBS (-0.36 %/year and -0.31 %/year, respectively) were seen for untreated subjects (both p < 0.001). Conversely, treated subjects exhibited a significant mean increase in BMD (+1.86 %/year, p < 0.002) and TBS (+0.20 %/year, p < 0.001). TBS is responsive to treatment with non-estrogen anti-resorptive drug therapy in women over age 50. The treatment-related increase in TBS is less than the increase in BMD, which is consistent with bone texture preservation.

Letter to the Editor

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a textural index that evaluates pixel gray‐level variations in the lumbar spine image by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. It provides an indirect assessment of trabecular microarchitecture that is an independent predictor of fracture risk. TBS does not appear to be clinically useful to monitor the skeletal effects of bisphosphonates and denosumab, but is potentially useful as a component of monitoring the skeletal effects of teriparatide and abaloparatide. The least significant change (LSC) for TBS can be conservatively estimated to be about 5.8% (the largest LSC in published data) or calculated by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry facility using the same methodology that is used for bone mineral density (BMD) precision assessment to calculate BMD LSC. A review of the best available evidence at the 2019 ISCD Position Development Conference concluded that the role of TBS in monitoring antiresorptive therapy is unclear and that TBS is potentially useful for monitoring anabolic therapy. For patients treated with teriparatide or abaloparatide, a statistically significant increase in TBS may represent a clinically meaningful improvement in trabecular structure. A significant decrease of TBS may represent a worsening of trabecular structure, suggesting the need for further clinical assessment and possible change in treatment strategies. Since BMD measures bone quantity and TBS measures bone quality, these tests can be considered complementary in assessing fracture risk and response to therapy in appropriate patients.