Interfacial area concentration (IAC) plays a critical role in heat and mass transfers between gas and liquid phases through the interfaces. As interfacial area increases, mass and heat transfers between phases increase. Hence, a reliable IAC estimation is important for two-phase flow numerical simulations to conduct engineering designs and safety analyses. Gas bubbles show different behavior according to their shapes and sizes. Based on the size, gas bubbles can be classified into two groups that show different characteristics, such as IAC. Hence, two-group modeling helps to achieve a general approach for estimating the IAC in bubbly to beyond-bubbly flow regimes. Available models in the literature use empirical correlations to obtain group one and group two void fractions. These empirical approaches are not reliable for different flow conditions. In addition, these models are usually complex with several empirical constants. This study aims to develop a two-group area-averaged IAC model for upward vertical dispersed flows through large-diameter pipes. In addition, this study proposes using a general approach based on the two-group drift-flux model to calculate two-group void fractions rather than applying empirical correlations. The models are evaluated using 156 two-group measured data points in dispersed flow conditions through large-diameter pipes. The resulting prediction errors for group one and group two IAC models are 24.1 % and 34.2 %, and the errors for group one and group two void fraction predictions are 22.8 % and 25.6 %, respectively.
Read full abstract