Incontinence In Community-dwelling Adults Research Articles

Exam 1: Global Prevalence of Fecal Incontinence in Community-Dwelling Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Exam 1: Global Prevalence of Fecal Incontinence in Community-Dwelling Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Multimorbidity increased the risk of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling adults: Results from the English Longitudinal Study On Ageing

Multimorbidity (MM) is common in older people. Recent evidence, largely from cross-sectional studies, suggests that MM could be a risk factor for urinary incontinence (UI). For this reason, we aimed to explore the association between MM at baseline and incident UI, and which individual chronic medical conditions/factors might explain the association between MM and UI, using data from the English Longitudinal Study on Ageing, during ten years of follow-up. MM was defined as having two or more chronic medical conditions; the presence of UI was assessed using self-reported information. A logistic regression analysis, adjusted for baseline potential confounders, was used to assess the association between MM and UI, reporting the data as odds ratios (ORs) with their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Of 9432 initial participants, 6742 (mean age: 64.8 years; 53.2 % females) without UI at baseline were included in the analysis. MM was present at baseline in 48.8 % of the participants. People with MM had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of UI than their counterparts, leading to a significantly higher risk of UI also after adjusting for potential confounders at baseline (OR = 1.30; 95 % CI: 1.14–1.48). Among the medical conditions, only three were significantly associated with incident UI, namely asthma, Parkinson's disease, and psychiatric disorders. In conclusion, MM at baseline was associated with an increased risk of UI during ten years of follow-up, suggesting that UI is more likely to be present in people with several chronic medical conditions.

What can community nurses do for older adults who experience faecal incontinence?

What can community nurses do for older adults who experience faecal incontinence?

Acquired fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults

Acquired fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults

Acquired fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults

Acquired fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults

The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature.

Reported prevalence estimates for fecal incontinence among community-dwelling adults vary widely. A systematic review was undertaken to investigate the studied prevalence of fecal incontinence in the community and explore the heterogeneity of study designs and sources of bias that may explain variability in estimates. A predetermined search strategy was used to locate all studies published that reported the prevalence of fecal incontinence in a community-based sample of adults. Data were extracted onto a proforma for sampling frame and method, sample size, response rate, definition of fecal incontinence used, data-collection method, and prevalence rates. Included studies were critically appraised for possible sources of selection bias, information bias, and imprecision. A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. These could be grouped into definitions of incontinence that included or excluded incontinence of flatus. The estimated prevalence of anal incontinence (including flatus incontinence) varied from 2 to 24 percent, and the estimated prevalence of fecal incontinence (excluding flatus incontinence) varied from 0.4 to 18 percent. Only three studies were found to have a study design that minimized significant sources of bias, and only one of these used a validated instrument for data collection. The prevalence estimate of fecal incontinence from these studies was 11 to 15 percent. No pooling of estimates was undertaken because there was wide variation in study design. A consensus definition of fecal incontinence is needed that accounts for alterations in quality of life. Further cross-sectional studies are required that minimize bias in their design and use validated self-administered questionnaires.