Incomplete Excision Of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Research Articles

Does Histological Incomplete Excision of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Following Large Loop Excision of Transformation Zone Increase Recurrence Rates? A Six Year Cytological Follow Up

Objective To determine the risk of recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in women with complete or incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated by large loop excision of transformation zone (LLETZ). Design A retrospective study Setting One consultant-led colposcopy clinic at Leicester Royal Infirmary Population Three hundred and ninety-four women referred consecutively to the colposcopy clinic between 1991 and 1992. Main outcome measures The histological recurrence rate of CIN, length of cytological follow up following treatment related to degree of completeness of excision at initial treatment. Results Three hundred and twenty-two women had complete cytological or histological follow up. The mean length of follow up was 73 months with a mean number of six smears. Women with incomplete excision of CIN had a significantly higher risk of recurrent CIN (relative risk 8.23) occurring in a significantly shorter time compared with women with complete excision. Conclusions This study demonstrates that large loop excision of transformation zone is successful in over 95% of cases. Cytological surveillance is satisfactory for follow up of women who have complete excision of CIN. Women with incomplete excision of CIN at initial LLETZ remain at significant risk of developing further CIN and long term colposcopic and cytological follow up is necessary.

Does histological incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia following large loop excision of transformation zone increase recurrence rates? A six year cytological follow up.

To determine the risk of recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in women with complete or incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated by large loop excision of transformation zone (LLETZ). A retrospective study One consultant-led colposcopy clinic at Leicester Royal Infirmary Three hundred and ninety-four women referred consecutively to the colposcopy clinic between 1991 and 1992. The histological recurrence rate of CIN, length of cytological follow up following treatment related to degree of completeness of excision at initial treatment. Three hundred and twenty-two women had complete cytological or histological follow up. The mean length of follow up was 73 months with a mean number of six smears. Women with incomplete excision of CIN had a significantly higher risk of recurrent CIN (relative risk 8.23) occurring in a significantly shorter time compared with women with complete excision. This study demonstrates that large loop excision of transformation zone is successful in over 95% of cases. Cytological surveillance is satisfactory for follow up of women who have complete excision of CIN. Women with incomplete excision of CIN at initial LLETZ remain at significant risk of developing further CIN and long term colposcopic and cytological follow up is necessary.

Completeness of excision and follow up cytology in patients treated with loop excision biopsy

Aims—To assess the relation between the grade and the status of follow up cytology, the completeness of loop excision biopsies with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and the findings at follow...

A review of the treatment failures following cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III treated by large loop excision of the transformation zone

The records of 208 women were reviewed to quantify the long-term treatment failures of large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) in the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade III. The rate of dyskariotic smears fell from 8% at 6 months to 2.3% at 48 months. The excision was considered incomplete in 84 cases (40.3%) of which 40 had endocervical margins involved. Thirty-five per cent of women with incomplete excision of CIN at the endocervical margin and 9% with complete excision had a dyskariotic smear within 4 years following LLETZ. These findings were statistically significant ( P = 0.003 and 0.02 respectively). However, 5% only of women in the former group had cytological treatment failure at 6 months. There was no significant association between age and incidence of treatment failure. Further data are required to determine the risk of recurrence beyond 4 years before recommendations could be made about the duration of annual screening.