Incomplete Decompression Research Articles

Attitudes Regarding Barriers to Entry and the Learning Curve Associated with Endoscopic Decompression-Only Surgery: An International Survey

Background ContextEndoscopic spine decompression surgery (ESDS) offers numerous benefits, including reduced tissue damage, smaller incisions, shorter recovery times, and a lower risk of complications. However, its adoption among spine surgeons in the United States has been slow. The reluctance to adopt ESDS can be attributed to factors such as the learning curve, cost of equipment and training, and limited access to necessary resources. PurposeThe primary objective of this study is to assess attitudes toward barriers to and reasons for not adopting ESDS. A secondary objective is to further identify the learning curves, challenges, and common concerns of surgeons considering ESDS adoption. Study Design/SettingAn international survey of fellowship-trained spine surgeons from the Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (SMISS). Patient SampleA total of 171 fellowship-trained spine surgeons from the Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery voluntarily and anonymously responded to our survey via the RedCap platform. Surgeons were located across the globe, representing six regions. Outcome MeasuresData on current region of practice, specialty training, time in practice, practice type, and surgical volume was obtained for each surgeon who responded to the survey. Additionally, we obtained data on perceived benefits, barriers to entry, and the learning curve of endoscopic techniques. MethodsA survey was distributed to fellowship-trained spine surgeons from the Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, with questions focusing on perceived benefits, barriers to adoption, and the learning curve of endoscopic techniques. ResultsA total of 171 surgeons responded to the survey, representing six regions: North America (48.0%), Asia Pacific (28.7%), and Europe (11.7%). Respondents were trained in Orthopaedic Surgery (59.1%) and Neurological Surgery (35.7%). Experience varied, with 35.9% having over 20 years in practice. Most respondents were in Private Practice (59.6%) or Academic/University settings (39.2%), with the majority practicing in urban areas (67.8%). Surgeons were categorized into the EG (50.3%) who used endoscopic techniques and the NEG (49.7%) who did not. There were no significant differences in training types or work settings between the groups. For the NEG, 23.5% were exposed to endoscopic techniques during training, and 50.6% received specific training in practice, mainly through formal industry courses (76.7%). The primary barriers to adopting ESDS were lack of training (55.3%), unavailability of equipment (50.6%), and financial concerns. EG surgeons cited minimizing tissue trauma, improved access to foraminal pathology, and minimizing recovery time as critical factors for using ESDS. Challenges included concerns for incomplete decompression and the duration of surgery, with significant variation in perceived difficulty during the learning curve. ConclusionDespite the recognized benefits of ESDS, barriers such as training deficiencies and equipment costs hinder its widespread adoption. Addressing these barriers through enhanced training opportunities and hospital system support could increase the adoption of ESDS, benefiting both surgeons and patients by reducing recovery times and complications.

Establishing a Common Term and Definition for Non-Structural Postoperative Radicular Pain Following Lumbar Decompression: A Scoping Review

Background: Patients often report recurrent or new radicular pain after direct or indirect lumbar decompressions. Such pain may result from structural causes such as implant subsidence or incomplete decompression, but often the pain lacks a clear structural cause. The wide variability in terms used to define non-structural, postoperative radicular pain complicates its analysis. Purpose: We aimed to elucidate the terminology and classification systems used to describe postoperative radicular pain after lumbar decompression and/or fusion surgery without clear structural etiology and to propose a new clinical definition. Methods: We conducted a scoping review that followed the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The search included studies from 2011 to 2023 involving patients over 18 years of age experiencing postoperative radicular pain after lumbar decompression and/or fusion. Results: Our analysis of 20 included articles found the most common terms used for non-structural radicular pain after lumbar decompression and/or fusion surgery were “postoperative radiculitis” (8 studies, 40%) and “failed back surgery syndrome” (FBSS) (5 studies, 25%). “Radiculitis” and related terms typically described short-term, self-limited radicular pain; “FBSS” and similar terms referred to chronic, treatment-resistant back, and leg pain. The incidence of non-structural postoperative radicular pain ranged from 0.9% to 43.8%. Conclusions: This scoping review found inconsistencies in the terms used to describe postoperative radicular pain after lumbar decompression and/or fusion surgery, and we therefore propose defining “postoperative radiculitis” as transient radicular pain, without structural pathology or motor weakness, typically emerging after initial symptom resolution (within 3 months of surgery) and resolving within 6 months of surgery. Future studies should focus on validating diagnostic metrics, exploring risk factors, and identifying prevention strategies and treatments for postoperative radiculitis.

Incidental durotomy resulting in a postoperative lumbosacral nerve root with eventration into the adjacent facet joint: illustrative cases.

Radicular pain after lumbar decompression surgery can result from epidural hematoma/seroma, recurrent disc herniation, incomplete decompression, or other rare complications. A less recognized complication is postoperative nerve root herniation, resulting from an initially unrecognized intraoperative or, more commonly, a spontaneous postoperative durotomy. Rarely, this nerve root herniation can become entrapped within local structures, including the facet joint. The aim of this study was to illustrate our experience with three cases of lumbosacral nerve root eventration into an adjacent facet joint and to describe our diagnostic and surgical approach to this rare complication. Three patients who had undergone lumbar decompression surgery with or without fusion experienced postoperative radiculopathy. Exploratory revision surgery revealed all three had a durotomy with nerve root eventration into the facet joint. Significant symptom improvement was achieved in all patients following liberation of the neural elements from the facet joints. Entrapment of herniated nerve roots into the facet joint may be a previously underappreciated complication and remains quite challenging to diagnose even with the highest-quality advanced imaging. Thus, clinicians must have a high index of suspicion to diagnose this issue and a low threshold for surgical exploration.

Very early re-do microvascular decompression for patients with trigeminal neuralgia

Although microvascular decompression (MVD) is the widely recognized surgical option for patient with trigeminal neuralgia (TN), and most patients could receive satisfactory outcome, some patients still complained of severe pain, with culprit vessel omission and incomplete decompression as the commonly mentioned reasons. Here we reported three cases of very early re-do MVD for patients with TN. We found that both artery and vein simultaneous compressed the trigeminal nerve, and tight adhesion was found between the vein and nerve. The artery was totally decompressed, but the vein could not be decompressed without affecting the blood flow due to the severe adhesion, the patients still complained of severe pain after the first surgery. Very early re-do MVD was performed and we totally separated the veins from the nerve. The symptoms of patients disappeared immediately without any complication. No recurrence was found during follow up. We conclude that culprit vein should be retained if possible, rather than sacrificed, and very early reoperation may be a feasible choice for patient with persistent symptom after MVD.

Overview and Prevention of Complications During Full-Endoscopic Cervical Spine Surgery

Objective: Posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy/discectomy (PECF) is used to treat medically intractable cervical radiculopathy. PECF has many potential advantages; however, despite its minimally invasive nature, complications of PECF are possible, including hemorrhage, infection, injury to neural tissue, damage to the facet joint and musculature, loss of cervical lordosis, and subsequent progression to cervical kyphosis. We examined complications following PECF and reviewed the relevant literature.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 101 patients who underwent PECF for either disc herniation (DH, 59 patients) or foraminal stenosis (FS, 42 patients). After surgery, the patients were encouraged to ambulate and were discharged 2–3 days later without the use of a neck collar. Events occurring during hospitalization were documented in the hospital information system. Patients were followed-up for a mean period of 21±26 months (range, 1–110 months).Results: Clinical parameters improved from 1 month postoperatively and were maintained throughout the follow-up period, with no significant differences between the DH and FS groups (p>0.05). Complications occurred in 14 patients (14%) with no significant difference between the DH (8 of 59, 14%) and FS (6 of 42, 14%) groups (p>0.05). The most common complication was dural tear, followed by motor weakness, sensory changes, hematoma collection, incomplete decompression, reoperation, and wrong-level surgery. Two patients underwent reoperation due to symptomatic hematoma collection and symptom recurrence 3 years postoperatively.Conclusion: The incidence of complications following PECF was 14%. Although most were transient, an understanding of both reported and unreported complications, along with thorough preparation, could reduce the occurrence of PECF-associated complications.

Comparison of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Diskectomy Using the Transforaminal Approach versus Interlaminar Approach for L5-S1 Lumbar Disk Herniation Treatment: A Meta-Analysis.

Numerous studies have examined the clinical effectiveness of transforaminal full endoscopic lumbar diskectomy (T-FELD) and interlaminar full endoscopic lumbar diskectomy (I-FELD) for L5-S1 lumbar disk herniation (LDH), with mixed findings. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes, clinical results, and complications of T-FELD and I-FELD to determine their efficacy and safety for treating L5-S1 LDH and to examine the features of complications in depth. Several databases were searched for articles that matched all of the inclusion criteria. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to assess the clinical results. Information on perioperative outcomes and complications was gathered and analyzed. Eight studies with 756 participants were included. There were no significant differences in postoperative bed time (p = 0.44) and hospitalization time (p = 0.49) between T-FELD and I-FELD. When compared with I-FELD, T-FELD was associated with substantially longer fluoroscopy time (p < 0.0001) and operating time (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative VAS and ODI scores between T-FELD and I-FELD. The rates for overall complications, postoperative dysesthesia, postoperative lower extremity pain, incomplete decompression, recurrence, and conversion to open surgery were comparable for T-FLED and I-FELD. T-FELD and I-FELD had equal clinical results and safety for treatment of L5-S1 LDH. Fluoroscopy and operative times were shorter for I-FELD than for T-FELD.

Overview and Prevention of Complications During Biportal Endoscopic Cervical Spine Surgery

Purpose: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery is becoming popular for various spinal pathologies, including cervical and thoracic spine diseases. However, the safety of biportal endoscopic cervical spine surgery (BECSS) has not been fully investigated, and inexperienced surgeons can cause serious complications. The study aimed to evaluate the complications of BECSS and identify tips for preventing them through a literature review and retrospective analysis of case series. Methods: Articles on BECSS were electronically retrieved from multiple databases, with inclusion criteria including controlled and case series designs, detailed reporting of complications and/or reoperations, and the use of BECSS. The study excluded simple review articles and case reports. The clinical data of 45 patients who underwent BECSS at our institution were collected, and information was extracted on demographic features, surgery type, surgical level, surgery-related complications, and reoperations and their reasons.Results: The study retrieved a total of 67 studies from 5 databases, of which 6 were included after screening. In total, 227 cases of BECSS were identified, and the overall complication rate was 0%–14.3%. Complications included dura tearing, symptom recurrence, incomplete decompression, postoperative epidural hematoma, and transient paralysis. Reoperation was performed in 3 cases.Conclusion: BECSS has similar complication rates to those of other surgical techniques. It is important to provide extensive education, share knowledge and experience, and conduct further research to minimize complications and improve outcomes for patients, as is the case with other spinal surgical procedures.

Risk Factors and Causes of Reoperation in Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Retrospective Case Series with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has gained popularity as a minimally invasive surgery for treating lumbar disc herniation. However, there is limited research focusing on the reoperation rate and its associated factors. This study aims to investigate the rate of reoperation and identify the causes and risk factors for reoperation after PELD. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PELD (interlaminar and transforaminal approaches) at our hospital from November 2016 to May 2020. A matched case-control design was employed to identify relevant risk factors for reoperation, with a matching ratio of 1:3. Clinical characteristics and radiological parameters were compared, and univariate analysis was performed using independent samples t-test and chi-squared test. RESULTS Among the 435 patients included in the study, the reoperation rate for those with a minimum 2-year follow-up was 6.2% (27/435). The causes of reoperation and their respective rates were as follows: recurrence of lumbar disc herniation (3.2%, 14/435), incomplete decompression (1.8%, 8/435), persistent low back pain (0.7%, 3/435), and postoperative infection (0.5%, 2/435). Univariate analysis revealed that age (P=0.015), Pfirrmann grade IV-V (P=0.017), and lack of active straight leg raise exercises (P=0.026) were significantly associated with reoperation. Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that age (P=0.001), Pfirrmann grade IV-V (P=0.033), and lack of active straight leg raise exercises postoperatively (P=0.003) were independent risk factors for reoperation after PELD. CONCLUSIONS The primary cause of reoperation in lumbar disc herniation patients after PELD was recurrence of the herniation. Additionally, severe disc degeneration, older age, and lack of active straight leg raise exercises were identified as significant risk factors associated with an increased reoperation rate.

Enhancing endoscopic foraminal decompression in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: the potential influence of lateral recess isthmic spur and our case series of an innovative craniocaudal interlaminar approach via unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery

BackgroundThe NASS guideline cannot recommend any of the surgical treatment options toward adult isthmic spondylolisthesis (AIS) since 2014. After the introduction of endoscopic decompression, instead of treating the spondylolysis itself, treatment can specifically target the refractory radicular pain developed during the degeneration progress without devastating the peripheral soft tissue. However, we noticed that endoscopic transforaminal decompression seems to be less effective in AIS compared to other types of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Thus, we came up with a novel craniocaudal interlaminar approach, utilizing the proximal adjacent interlaminar space to perform bilateral decompression and observed the pathoanatomy of pars defect directly and tried to identify the cause of decompression failure.MethodsFrom January 2022 to June 2022, 13 patients with AIS underwent endoscopic decompression via the endoscopic craniocaudal interlaminar approach and were followed up for at least 6 months. Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index and MacNab scores were recorded to monitor patients’ clinical recovery. All endoscopic procedures were recorded and reviewed to illustrate the pathoanatomy.ResultsFour patients required minor revision via the same technique. One of them required it due to incomplete isthmic spur resection, two due to neglected disc protrusion, and the other due to root subpedicular kinking in higher grade anterolisthesis. All patients’ clinical condition improved significantly subsequently. After reviewing the endoscopic video, we have observed that the hook-like, ragged spur originating from the isthmic defect extends beyond the region around the foramen. Instead, it extends proximally into the adjacent lateral recess, resulting in impingement along the fracture edge above the index foramen and, in some cases, even in the extraforaminal area.ConclusionsThe broad spanning isthmic spur extending to the proximal adjacent lateral recess might be the reason why the transforaminal approach yielded less satisfactory results due to the incomplete decompression result from approach related restriction. Our study demonstrated an optimistic outcome by applying decompression from the upper level. Therefore, we propose that the craniocaudal interlaminar approach might be a better route for decompression in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Current Concepts in the Management of Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Review.

Following a systematic review of the literature, we describe the need for a thorough patient history, physical examination, and radiologic images which have been reported to correctly diagnose neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Additionally, we review the various surgical techniques recommended to treat this syndrome. Postoperative functional outcomes have been shown to be more favorable in arterial and venous thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) patients when compared with neurogenic TOS patients, likely due to the ability to completely remove the site of compression in cases of vascular TOS as compared with incomplete decompression in neurogenic TOS. In this review article, we provide an overview of the anatomy, etiology, diagnostic modalities, and current treatment options of correcting neurogenic TOS. Additionally, we offer a detailed step-by-step technique of the supraclavicular approach to the brachial plexus, a preferred approach for decompressing neurogenic TOS.

Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Systematic Review

In recent years, biportal endoscopic surgery has gained popularity, and the number of publications on it has also increased. We herein aimed to investigate the complications of biportal endoscopic surgery. In this study, the available literature was reviewed systematically and the published complications of discectomy in biportal endoscopic spinal surgery were summarized. A systematic search of the literature published until December 31, 2021, was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Studies on spinal discectomy using the biportal method were included. Twenty-two articles were finally included for review. The reported complication rate of this procedure was 0%-23.6% (radiological hematoma). In most studies, the complication rate was less than 11%. The mean complication rate was 5.37% when 596 patients (from 16 studies) underwent unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disk herniation. The reported complications of this procedure included dural tear, hematoma, incomplete decompression, recurrence, instability, neurological complications (post-op paresthesia, dysthesia or numbness, or root injury), pseudomeningocele, ascites, infection, retinal hemorrhage, and burn injury. The complication rate was higher in the early learning curve. Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy has an acceptable complication rate. Knowing the possible complications and risks of this procedure could help surgeons in taking measures to avoid common complications.

Indications, Contraindications, and Complications of Biportal Endoscopic Decompressive Surgery for the Treatment of Lumbar Stenosis: A Systematic Review

Biportal endoscopic spine surgery is gaining popularity in managing degenerative lumbar diseases and has optimal indications and contraindications. The perioperative complications related to the biportal endoscopic approach affect the postoperative outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to review the indications, contraindications, and complications of biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar stenosis. For this systematic review, articles on biportal endoscopic decompressive surgery for lumbar stenosis, including central, lateral recess and foraminal stenoses, were searched for and reviewed. Additionally, the complications, indications, and contraindications of biportal endoscopic surgery for lumbar stenosis were reviewed. Forty-one articles were included in this study. The indications for biportal endoscopic decompression are central lumbar stenosis, central stenosis with lipomatosis, lateral recess stenosis, foraminal stenosis, and the far-out syndrome. The contraindications include trauma, infection, tumor, instability, high-grade spondylolisthesis, isthmic spondylolisthesis, and severe scoliosis. Perioperative complications are typically minor; major complications include durotomy, epidural hematoma, incomplete decompression, infection, facet joint injury, neural injury, increased epidural pressure, and postoperative instability. Favorable indications for a biportal endoscopic approach are central lumbar, lateral recess, foraminal, extraforaminal stenoses, and the Bertolotti syndrome. Incidental durotomy and postoperative epidural hematomas are common complications of biportal endoscopic decompression.

Contraindications and Complications of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review

The purpose of this study was to suggest appropriate indications and contraindications for full endoscopic surgery and to predict the prognosis for the incidence of complications by reviewing the literature on full endoscopic lumbar decompression for various spinal stenoses and systematically analyzing the contraindications and complications of endoscopic surgery. We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE database to identify articles on full endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. The levels of evidence in all studies were classified according to the method adopted by the North American Spine Society (NASS) 2005. Full endoscopic lumbar decompression was divided into interlaminar and transforaminal decompressions. We selected articles that contained preoperative contraindications and complications during and after surgery. We analyzed the evidence level and classified the prescribed contraindications and complications according to the literature. We identified 362 articles, of which 57 met our criteria, with evidence ranging from levels I to V. After reviewing the literature on full endoscopic lumbar decompression, pure back pain without neurogenic symptoms and instability/deformities requiring stabilization were found to be contraindications. Also, in transforaminal decompression, central stenosis or complex foraminal stenoses were contraindications. Dysesthesia (most common), untreated pain, dural tear, disc herniation, infection, incomplete decompression, and other complications have been reported as complications of transforaminal decompression. On the other hand, dural tear (most common), epidural hematoma, transient dysesthesia, untreated pain, motor weakness, and other complications have been reported in interlaminar decompression. Full endoscopic lumbar surgery, including transforaminal and interlaminar decompression, is a safe and effective surgical option for treating lumbar spinal stenosis; however, it is important to select the transforaminal or interlaminar approach according to the indication.

Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

In recent years, unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery has been used for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with good results. Some investigators counted the total incidence of complications in unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, but none have analyzed the incidence of specific complications. The present study further counted the incidence of specific complications and gave the possible causes of the complications. English databases including PubMed were searched to collect relevant literature on unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. The inquiry period is from January 1, 2015, to July 1, 2022. The literature was screened, information extracted, and risk of bias evaluated by the researchers, followed by Meta analysis using R4.2.1 and RStudio statistical software. In total, we included 14 studies involving 707 patients. The included studies were retrospective case series, The results of the single-arm rate meta-analysis showed that the total complication rate of unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis was 8.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] [0.060; 0.103]); of which, the highest incidence of dural tear was 4.5% (95% CI [0.030; 0.064]), the incidence of symptomatic postoperative spinal epidural hematoma was approximately 1.1% (95% CI [0.001; 0.027]), the incidence of incomplete decompression was 2.0% (95% CI [0.007; 0.038]), the incidence of transient palsy was 2.6% (95% CI [0.005; 0.057]). The incidence of total complications of unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis was 8.1%, dural tear remained a major complication with an incidence of 4.5%, incomplete decompression was 2.0%, transient palsy was 2.6%, and, unexpectedly, symptomatic postoperative spinal epidural hematoma was only 1.1%.

Research progress of unilateral biportal endoscopy technique in treatment of lumbar related diseases

To review the application and research progress of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) technique in the treatment of lumbar related diseases. The domestic and foreign literature on the application of UBE technique in the treatment of lumbar related diseases was extensively consulted, and the development history, clinical application, operation points and precautions, related complications and adverse reactions, advantages and disadvantages of the technique were reviewed. As a minimally invasive technique developed in recent years, UBE technique is effective in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis caused by different causes, with satisfactory decompression effect, less damage, and good lumbar stability. UBE technique has significant advantages over open surgery and microscopy-assisted surgery in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. In the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis, the postoperative trauma of UBE technique is less than that of conventional surgery, and the fusion rate is satisfactory. There are also complications such as spinal cord injury, spinal epidural hematoma, incomplete decompression or recurrence, nerve root irritation symptoms, and postoperative infection in the treatment of lumbar related diseases with UBE technique. Detailed preoperative planning is essential for patients with lumbar related diseases who are suitable for UBE surgery. UBE technique is easy to operate, has a gentle learning curve, can use conventional instruments, and has definite effectiveness. It is suitable for a variety of lumbar related diseases, but there are some defects and deficiencies.

Comparative Analysis of Transforaminal Endoscopic Thoracic Discectomy and Microscopic Discectomy for Symptomatic Thoracic Disc Herniation.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic thoracic discectomy (TETD) and microscopic discectomy (MD) for the treatment of symptomatic thoracic disc herniation (TDH). MethodsSeventy-seven patients (mean, 55.9 years; follow-up, 11.2 months) with symptomatic TDH were retrospectively reviewed (39 TETD and 38 MD). Radiological factors and perioperative outcomes were reviewed. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale were used to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using modified MacNab criteria. ResultsThe levels of surgery and the location of hernia were evenly distributed in the both groups. The operative time (70.6 minutes vs. 175.7 minutes), estimated blood loss (3.8 mL vs. 357.4 mL), and length of hospital stay (7.0 days vs. 13.0 days) were significantly different between the TETD and MD groups (p<0.05). VAS scores for dorsal back pain and ODI scores were significantly improved in both groups (p<0.05). Patients who underwent TETD tended to be more satisfied with the outcome in terms of the modified MacNab criteria (89.7% vs. 73.0%, p=0.059). Two patients in the MD group underwent revision surgery, whereas one patient in the TETD group underwent MD because of incomplete decompression. ConclusionTETD for the symptomatic TDH is a feasible and safe procedure that could be used for a wider range of surgical levels with a shorter operative time and hospital stay and less blood loss. While achieving similar outcomes, TETD achieved better patient satisfaction because of the use of local anesthesia and its minimal invasiveness.

Referred Trigeminal Pain from Greater Occipital Nerve Entrapment: Importance of Accurate Greater Occipital Nerve Decompression

Trigeminocervical complex (TCC) sensitization by chronic entrapment of the greater occipital nerve (GON) often causes difficult-to-understand referred trigeminal facial pain along with occipital neuralgia. This report emphasizes the importance of accurate diagnosis and GON decompression by describing a case of a 51-year-old female patient with referred trigeminal pain from occipital neuralgia misdiagnosed as chronic migraine. The patient underwent incomplete decompression surgery. She presented with a relentless stinging and stabbing pain in her left hemiface and temporo-occipital area for 8 years. The pain occurred suddenly without improvement after long-term medical and injection treatment. She was diagnosed with chronic migraine and underwent so-called “migraine surgery” three years ago, but to no avail. Incomplete decompression of the bilateral GONs within the trapezial tunnel was confirmed under a microscopic oblique-paramedian approach. After accurate decompression, the chronic stabbing pain in the left facial and temporo-occipital region disappeared. Only intermittent numbness was felt. It is important to recognize occipital neuralgia caused by chronic GON entrapment and referred facial pain caused by TCC sensitization. Referred pain still often seems to be misunderstood as various other diseases. Direct decompression of the trapezial tunnel using a neurosurgical microscopic approach based on an accurate assessment of anatomical considerations may be important for GON decompression.

Anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion: quantitative analysis of a single surgeon's learning experience

BACKGROUND CONTEXTAnterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) is a novel surgical technique for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) but the surgical learning curve for this technique has not been previously characterized. PURPOSEThe aim of this study was to quantify a surgeon's learning curve for ACAF and the effect of surgeon experience on postoperative outcomes. STUDY DESIGNProspective study of a single institution and single surgeon experience with ACAF surgery. PATIENT SAMPLEA total of 70 consecutive patients with OPLL undergoing ACAF surgery by a single, non-ACAF trained surgeon between 2017 and 2020 were analyzed. OUTCOME MEASURESIntraoperative and postoperative outcomes (blood loss, operative time, errors of surgical procedure, length of hospital stay, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system, and surgical complications) were assessed. METHODSWe prospectively reviewed the first 70 ACAF procedures between 2017 and 2020 performed by a single, non-ACAF trained surgeon. The function relationship between the operative time and case number was fitted using a locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) plot. Spearman's correlation analysis was performed to determine factors affecting the operative time. The operative time-related learning curve for ACAF was established and difficulty of each procedure was assessed using a cumulative sum (CUSUM) model. The association between the specific errors of surgical procedures and surgeon experience was further analyzed. A modified CUSUM model was also used to establish the surgical procedure-related learning curve, and thus whether these two learning curves matched with each other was observed. Postoperative outcomes in relation to surgeon experience was compared using a Wilcoxon rank sum test and Chi-squared test. RESULTSOperative time presented a specific pattern of fewer patient-dependent changes as the case number increased. Spearman's correlation analysis showed the operative time was more affected by the case number (r=-0.73) than the complexity of condition and number of levels hoisted. The operative time-related CUSUM model identified the early (first 29 cases) and late phase (late 41 cases) of the learning process, which was also confirmed by a modified CUSUM model based on surgical procedure. The critical point of the CUSUM model for bilateral osteotomies was at case number 29, and time reduction after the early phase was approximately 34 minutes. Length of hospital stay and blood loss were less during the late phase than during the early phase (p<.05). Although no significant difference was observed in postoperative JOA scores between two phases, patients in the late phase obtained higher recovery rates of neurologic function than those in the early phase (p<.01). There was significant difference in the number of specific errors between the two phases (p=.02). There were no significant differences in overall complication rates between two phases, but a higher incidence of certain complications caused by specific errors was observed in the early phase (p=.02), including CSF leakage, C5 palsy and incomplete decompression. CONCLUSIONSWe described, for the first time, a detailed learning curve for ACAF surgery. About 29 cases were needed to achieve mastery of ACAF. Once mastered, the surgeon could deal with various OPLL presentations in a universal way regardless of condition complexity and number of surgical levels. Bilateral osteotomies were the most difficult part of ACAF and produced the greatest reduction in time after mastery. We found a close association between specific errors of surgical procedure for ACAF and surgeon experience. Furthermore, certain complications caused by these errors should be on the alert during the early phase of learning ACAF, including CSF leakage, C5 palsy and incomplete decompression.

Complications and risk factors of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis

BackgroundWith the advancements in surgical methods, optical designs, and surgical instruments, percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) has become an effective and minimally invasive procedure to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in recent years. Few studies have focused on the complications associated with the treatment of LSS using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). This study aimed to summarize the complications of PETD and identify the associated risk factors.MethodsComplications in a total of 738 consecutive LSS patients who underwent single-level PETD were retrospectively recorded and analyzed between January 2016 and July 2020. In addition, a matched case-control study was designed, and according to the date of operation, the control group was matched with patients without complications, with a matching ratio of 1:3. Demographic parameters included age, sex, BMI, smoking and drinking status, comorbidity, and surgical level. The radiological parameters included grade of surgical-level disc degeneration, number of degenerative lumbar discs, grade of lumbar spinal stenosis, degenerative lumbar scoliosis, lumbar lordosis, disc angle, and disc height index. Univariate analysis was performed using independent samples t-test and chi-squared test.ResultsThe incidence of different types of complications was 9.76% (72/738). The complications and occurrence rates were as follows: recurrence of LSS (rLSS), 2.30% (17/738); persistent lumbosacral or lower extremity pain, 3.79% (28/738); dural tear, 1.90% (14/738); incomplete decompression, 0.81% (6/738); surgical site infection, 0.41% (3/738); epidural hematoma, 0.27% (2/738); and intraoperative posterior neck pain, 0.27% (2/738). Univariate analysis demonstrated that age, the grade of surgical-level disc degeneration (P < 0.001) and the number of disc degeneration levels (P = 0.004) were significantly related to the complications.ConclusionComplications in the treatment of LSS using PELD included rLSS, persistent pain of the lumbosacral or lower extremity, dural tear, incomplete decompression, surgical site infection, epidural hematoma, and intraoperative posterior neck pain. In addition, old age, severe grade of surgical-level disc degeneration and more disc degeneration levels significantly increased the incidence of complications.

Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Basic Concepts and Technical Keys to Clinical Success.

Open microdiscectomy is the gold standard surgical technique for radiculopathy with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) has been developed as an effective and minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. As a result of these remarkable technical evolutions, the clinical outcomes of TELD have become comparable to those of conventional open surgery. However, considerable learning curves and endoscopy-related adverse events may emerge as critical problems. The objective of this article was to inform on the basic principles, surgical techniques, and keys to clinical success in preventing complications. A narrative review of the literature focused on the surgical indications, technical tips, complications, and learning curve of the full-endoscopic procedure was performed. First, the transforaminal endoscopic system should access as close as possible to the target point, avoiding exiting nerve root irritation. Second, selective removal of the herniated disc fragments after sufficiently releasing the annular anchorage parts is essential to avoid incomplete decompression or prevent an early recurrence. Third, the endpoint of the procedure can be determined at the point of solid pulsation and free mobilization of the nerve root. Finally, surgeons should always ensure that the anatomical layers discriminate the neural tissue and disc material during the procedure.Some authors have demonstrated the effectiveness of TELD through randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and systemic reviews. According to these studies, the clinical outcomes of TELD are not inferior to those of open discectomy, with an earlier recovery period and fewer complications. The full-endoscopic transforaminal discectomy technique for soft LDH is an effective alternative with the benefits of minimally invasive surgery in appropriately selected patients. Given recent technical developments, the surgical indications for TELD will be broader and the clinical outcomes will be more reliable.