Incidental Vertebral Fractures Research Articles

Three-year effect of bisphosphonates on bone mineral density after denosumab withdrawal: observations from a real-world study.

Data on long-term treatment regimens for preventing bone mineral density (BMD) loss that occurs after denosumab (Dmab) withdrawal are scarce. Our aim was to evaluate the long-term changes (12-36months) in BMD and bone turnover markers in a group of postmenopausal women who had been treated with Dmab and received subsequent treatment with bisphosphonates. Secondary objectives were to evaluate factors associated with BMD loss, to compare the BMD change in patients who received oral vs intravenous bisphosphonates, and to assess the frequency of fragility fractures after Dmab discontinuation. The clinical data of 54 patients, 26 of whom had clinical and DXA assessments at 36months, were analyzed. After 12months, the mean LS BMD had decreased by 2.8% (±5.0), FN BMD by 1.9% (±5.8), and TH BMD by 1.9% (±3.7). After 36months, LS BMD had decreased by 3.7% (±6.7), FN BMD by 2.5% (±7.1), and TH BMD by 3.6% (±5.2). C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen significantly increased during the first 12months after Dmab withdrawal but then decreased at 36months. BMD loss at 12months was higher in patients with more than 30months of Dmab treatment, but this difference was only statistically significant at FN (-3.3% vs -0.3%, P = .252 at LS, -3.3% vs 0.3%, P = .033 at FN, and -2.1% vs 0.9, P = .091 at TH). There were no statistically significant differences regarding the change in BMD at 12 and 36months between oral and intravenous treatment. Seven patients suffered incidental vertebral fractures (clinical vertebral fractures: n = 6, morphometric fractures: n = 1) three of which were multiple. None of these patients were treated following international or institutional guidelines or recommendations. In summary, our study suggests that bisphosphonates can help maintain BMD for 36months after Dmab discontinuation.

THU050 The Role Of The GH Receptor Polymorphism As Prognostic Factor Of Vertebral Fractures In Acromegaly Patients Resistant To First Generation SSAs And Treated With GH Receptor Antagonist Or Second Generation Somatostatin Ligand

Abstract Disclosure: F. Costanza: None. S. Chiloiro: None. A. Giampietro: None. P. Mattogno: None. A. Infante: None. F. Angelini: None. L. Lauretti: None. A. Olivi: None. A. Pontecorvi: None. F. Doglietto: None. L. De Marinis: None. A. Bianchi: None. Acromegaly is associated with skeletal fragility and an increased prevalence of vertebral fractures (VF). In recent years several authors have tried to investigate the markers that can predict the risk of bone fragility in this endocrine disorder. Two different isoforms of the GH receptor (GHR) have been described so far, which differ in the presence or absence of a transcript of exon 3 of the GHR gene. Both isoforms produce a functional receptor, but the exon 3-deleted isoforms (d3-GHR) have greater sensitivity to endogenous and recombinant GH than the full-length isoform (fl-GHR). We conducted a longitudinal, retrospective, observational, single-center study of first-generation SSA-resistant acromegaly patients, with the aim of investigating the role of GHR polymorphism as a prognostic factor of incidental VF (I-VF) in first-generation SSA-resistant acromegalic patients and treated with GH receptor antagonist (Pegvisomant) or second-generation somatostatin ligand (Pasireotide Lar).72 patients with acromegaly were included. 28 patients carried d3-GHR isoform (38.9%) and 44 patients carried fl-GHR isoform (61.1%). At baseline, all patients were affected by active acromegaly; 46 patients were treated with Pegvisomant in combination with first generation SSA and 26 were treated with Pasireotide Lar. 18 patients (25%) carried P-VFs. At last follow-up, 58 patients achieved biochemical control of acromegaly (80.6%). 14 patients experienced the occurrence of I-VFs. From the group treated with Pegvisomant in combination with first generation SSA, 32 patients carried fl-GHR polymorphism and 14 carried d3-GHR polymorphism. At baseline, 10 patients (21.7%) were I-VF carriers. At follow-up, 8 patients developed P-VF (17.4%). I-VF occurred more frequently in patients carrying fl-GHR isoform compared to d3-GHR (p=0.04). From the group treated with Pasireotide Lar, 12 patients carried fl-GHR isoform and 14 patients carried d3-GHR isoform. At baseline, 8 patients (30.8%) were I-VF carriers. At follow-up, 6 patients developed P-VF (23.1%). I-VF occurred more frequently in patients carrying d3-GHR isoform than fl-GHR (p=0.01) and in patients with P-VF as compared to patients without P-VF (p=0.05).In conclusion, the GH receptor polymorphism could assume greater relevance as a prognostic factor of VF in acromegaly patients. In the future, the knowledge of the GHR polymorphism may improve the therapeutic approach of acromegaly patients, tailored to the individual patient, in the context of personalized medicine. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023

Management of Adrenal Cortical Adenomas: Assessment of Bone Status in Patients with (Non-Functioning) Adrenal Incidentalomas

Our aim is to analyse the bone profile in adults with (non-functioning) adrenal incidentalomas (AIs), specifically addressing the impact of autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS). This narrative review, based on a PubMed search from inception to February 2023 (case reports, non-ACS, and other secondary causes of osteoporosis were excluded), included 40 original studies, a total of 3046 patients with female prevalence (female:male ratio of 1921:1125), aged between 20.5 and 95.5 years old. This three decade-based analysis showed that 37 studies provided dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) information; another five studies reports results on bone micro-architecture, including trabecular bone score (TBS), spinal deformity index, and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography; 20 cohorts included data on bone turnover markers (BTMs), while four longitudinal studies followed subjects between 1 and 10.5 years old (surgical versus non-adrenalectomy arms). Post-dexamethasone suppression test (DST) cortisol was inversely associated with bone mineral density (BMD). TBS predicted incidental vertebral fractures (VFx) regardless of BMD, being associated with post-DST cortisol independently of age and BMD. Low BTMs were identified in ACS, but not all studies agreed. An increased prevalence of ACS-related osteoporosis was confirmed in most studies (highest prevalence of 87.5%), as well as of VFx, including in pre-menopause (42.5%), post-menopause (78.6%), and male patients (72.7%) depending on the study, with a 10-fold increased incidental VFx risk up to a 12-fold increased risk after a 2-year follow-up. No specific medication against osteoporosis is indicated in ACS, but adrenalectomy (according to four studies) should be part of the long-term strategy. This bone profile case sample-based study (to our knowledge, one of the largest of its kind) showed that AIs, including the subgroup designated as having ACS, embraces a large panel of osseous complications. The level of evidence remains far from generous; there are still no homogenous results defining ACS and identifying skeletal involvement, which might be a consequence of different investigation clusters underling adrenal and bone assessments over time. However, bone status evaluations and associated therapy decisions remain an essential element of the management of adults with AIs-ACS.

Associations of incidental vertebral fractures and longitudinal changes of MR-based proton density fat fraction and T2* measurements of vertebral bone marrow.

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques such as chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation techniques (CSE-MRI) are increasingly applied as noninvasive biomarkers to assess the biochemical composition of vertebrae. This study aims to investigate the longitudinal change of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and T2* derived from CSE-MRI of the thoracolumbar vertebral bone marrow in patients that develop incidental vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), and whether PDFF and T2* enable the prediction of an incidental VCF. In this study we included 48 patients with CT-derived bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at baseline. Patients that presented an incidental VCF at follow up (N=12, mean age 70.5 ± 7.4 years, 5 female) were compared to controls without incidental VCF at follow up (N=36, mean age 71.1 ± 8.6 years, 15 females). All patients underwent 3T MRI, containing a significant part of the thoracolumbar spine (Th11-L4), at baseline, 6-month and 12 month follow up, including a gradient echo sequence for chemical shift encoding-based water-fat separation, from which PDFF and T2* maps were obtained. Associations between changes in PDFF, T2* and BMD measurements over 12 months and the group (incidental VCF vs. no VCF) were assessed using multivariable regression models. Mixed-effect regression models were used to test if there is a difference in the rate of change in PDFF, T2* and BMD between patients with and without incidental VCF. Prior to the occurrence of an incidental VCF, PDFF in vertebrae increased in the VCF group (ΔPDFF=6.3 ± 3.1%) and was significantly higher than the change of PDFF in the group without VCF (ΔPDFF=2.1 ± 2.5%, P=0.03). There was no significant change in T2* (ΔT2*=1.7 ± 1.1ms vs. ΔT2*=1.1 ± 1.3ms, P=0.31) and BMD (ΔBMD=-1.2 ± 11.3mg/cm3 vs. ΔBMD=-11.4 ± 24.1mg/cm3, P= 0.37) between the two groups over 12 months. At baseline, no significant differences were detected in the average PDFF, T2* and BMD of all measured vertebrae (Th11-L4) between the VCF group and the group without VCF (P=0.66, P=0.35 and P= 0.21, respectively). When assessing the differences in rates of change, there was a significant change in slope for PDFF (2.32 per 6 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-4.32; P=0.03) but not for T2* (0.02 per 6 months, CI -0.98-0.95; P=0.90) or BMD (-4.84 per 6 months, CI -23.4-13.7; P=0.60). In our study population, the average change of PDFF over 12 months is significantly higher in patients that develop incidental fractures at 12-month follow up compared to patients without incidental VCF, while T2* and BMD show no significant changes prior to the occurrence of the incidental vertebral fractures. Therefore, a longitudinal increase in bone marrow PDFF may be predictive for vertebral compression fractures.

Associations of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio with Osteoporosis and Incident Vertebral Fracture in Postmenopausal Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background and Objectives: We investigated whether nutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphoycte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) are associated with the presence of osteoporosis (OP) and vertebral fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 413 postmenopausal patients with RA and 200 healthy controls who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) between January 2005 and December 2017. DEXA examination data were defined as the index date, and all laboratory values were measured within one month from the index date. OP was defined as a T-score < −2.5, and incident vertebral fractures were defined as the first occurrence of non-traumatic fractures after the index date. NLR, PLR, and MLR measures were dichotomized by a median split (low vs. high). Results: The median NLR, PLR, and MLR in RA patients were significantly higher than those in controls. The frequencies of OP of the lumbar spine, hip, and either site in postmenopausal patients with RA were 24.7%, 15.5%, and 32%, respectively, and were significantly higher than those in controls. After adjusting for confounding factors, a high baseline NLR was significantly associated with OP at either site (OR = 1.61, p = 0.041). In addition, high baseline NLR (OR = 2.11, p = 0.025) and PLR (OR = 2.3, p = 0.011) were related with the presence OP at hip. During the follow-up period, 53 (12.8%) patients with RA developed vertebral fractures incidentally. In multivariable Cox regression models, a high baseline NLR (HR = 4.72, p < 0.001), PLR (HR = 1.96, p = 0.024), and MLR (HR = 2.64, p = 0.002) were independently associated with a higher risk of incidental vertebral fractures. Conclusions: Our data suggest that NLR, PLR, and MLR can be used as potential markers of systemic bone loss among individuals with RA.

Integration of a vertebral fracture identification service into a fracture liaison service: a quality improvement project.

This service improvement project aimed to improve detection of incidental vertebral fractures on routine imaging. It embedded a vertebral fracture identification service (Optasia Medical, OM) on routine computerised tomography (CT) scans performed in this hospital as part of its Fracture Liaison Service (FLS). The service was integrated into the hospital's CT workstream. Scans of patients aged ≥ 50 years for 3 months were prospectively retrieved, alongside their clinical history and the CT report. Fractures were identified via OM's machine learning algorithm and cross-checked by the OM radiologist. Fractures identified were then added as an addendum to the original CT report and the hospital FLS informed. The FLS made recommendations based on an agreed algorithm. In total, 4461 patients with CT scans were retrieved over the 3-month period of which 850 patients had vertebra fractures identified (19.1%). Only 49% had the fractures described on hospital radiology report. On average, 61 patients were identified each week with a median of two fractures. Thirty-six percent were identified by the FLS for further action and recommendations were made to either primary care or the community osteoporosis team within 3 months of fracture detection. Of the 64% not identified for further action, almost half was because the CT was part of cancer assessment or treatment. The remaining were due to a combination of only ≤ 2 mild fractures; already known to a bone health specialist; in the terminal stages of any chronic illness; significant dependency for activities of daily living; or a life expectancy of less than 12 months CONCLUSION: It was feasible to integrate a commercial vertebral fracture identification service into the daily working of a FLS. There was a significant increase in workload which needs to be considered by any future FLS planning to incorporate such a service into their clinical practice.

Prevalence of Vertebral Fractures in CTPA’s in Adults Aged 75 and Older and Their Association with Subsequent Fractures and Mortality

Identifying vertebral fractures is prudent in the management of osteoporosis and the current literature suggests that less than one-third of incidental vertebral fractures are reported. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of reported and unreported vertebral fractures in computerized tomography pulmonary angiograms (CTPA) and their relevance to clinical outcomes. All acutely unwell patients aged 75 or older who underwent CTPAs were reviewed retrospectively. 179 CTPAs were reviewed to identify any unreported vertebral fractures. A total of 161 were included for further analysis. Of which, 14.3% (23/161) were reported to have a vertebral fracture, however, only 8.7% (14/161) of reports used the correct terminology of ‘fracture’. On subsequent review, an additional 19.3% (31/161) were noted to have vertebral fractures. Therefore, the overall prevalence of vertebral fractures was 33.5% (54/161). A total of 22.2% (12/54) of patients with a vertebral fracture on CTPA sustained a new fragility fracture during the follow-up period (4.5 years). In comparison, a significantly lower 10.3% (11/107) of patients without a vertebral fracture developed a subsequent fragility fracture during the same period (p = 0.04). Overall mortality during the follow-up period was significantly higher for patients with vertebral fractures (68.5%, 37/54) as compared to those without (45.8%, 49/107, p = 0.006). Vertebral fractures within the elderly population are underreported on CTPAs. The significance of detecting incidental vertebral fractures is clear given the increased rates of subsequent fractures and mortality. Radiologists and physicians alike must be made aware of the importance of identifying and treating incidental, vertebral fragility fractures.

Clinical Utility of Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Vertebral Fractures From Computed Tomography Images.

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a risk factor for morbidity and mortality, frequently asymptomatic and often present in computed tomography (CT) scans performed for unrelated conditions. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of VCF from such images can potentially improve identification and treatment of osteoporosis. This single-blinded, single tertiary center study compared a CAD (Zebra Medical Vision®) to an adjudicated imaging specialist reevaluation using a retrospective consecutive sample of abdominal and thoracic CT scans (n = 2357) performed as part of routine care. Subjects over 50 years between January 1, 2019 and May 12, 2019 were included. Duplicates and unanalyzable scans were excluded resulting in a total of 1696 CT scans. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated for all VCF and for Genant grades 2 or 3 (ie, height loss of >25%) using imaging specialist as the gold standard. Prestudy VCF reporting by hospital-rostered radiologist was used to calculate the number of scans needed to screen (NNS) to detect one additional VCF using CAD. Prevalence of any VCF was 24% (406/1696) and of Genant 2/3 VCF was 18% (280/1570). The sensitivity and specificity were 54% and 92%, for all fractures, respectively, and 65% and 92% for Genant 2/3 fractures, respectively. Accuracy for any VCF, and for detection of Genant 2/3 VCF, was 83% and 88%, respectively. Of 221 CAD-detected VCFs, 133 (60.2%) were reported prestudy resulting in 88 additional fractures (72 Genant 2/3) being identified by CAD. NNS to detect one additional VCF was 19 scans for all fractures and 23 for Genant 2/3 fractures. Thus, the CAD tested in this study had a high specificity with moderate sensitivity to detect incidental vertebral fractures in CT scans performed for routine care. A low NNS suggests it is an efficient tool to assist radiologists and clinicians to improve detection and reporting of vertebral fractures. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

The Impact of Geometrical Spinal Shape on Fresh Vertebral Fractures in Elderly Volunteers: A Longitudinal Cohort Analysis.

Four-year, longitudinal cohort study. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of original spinal shape on incidental vertebral fractures (VFs) and to identify the influence of changes in pre- and post-fracture geometrical spinal shape. Clinical evidence demonstrates that VFs cause spinal kyphosis, morbidities, and deteriorating quality of life in elderly people. However, knowledge of geometrical spinal shapes that affect incidental VFs is limited. Three hundred seventeen volunteers underwent whole spine radiography as part of a health screening in both 2012 and 2016. We extracted volunteers with incidental VF in 2016. Sex- and age-matched volunteers without VF were enrolled as controls. Baseline demographic variables, geometrical spinal shape, and spinopelvic parameters were compared between the two groups. In volunteers with incidental VF, we investigated the association between baseline spinal shape and post-fracture shape. Twenty-seven volunteers (12 men; mean age 75.4 ± 5.4 and 15 women; mean age 71.6 ± 7.9) with VF were enrolled, and 175 volunteers (48 men, 127 women) without VF were selected as controls. In men with VF, the thoracic kyphosis apex was located significantly more posteriorly and caudally than in those without VF. In women with VF, the lordosis apex was located significantly more posteriorly and caudally than in those without VF. After fractures occurring above the inflexion vertebra, the low anterior apex spine (L5) changed its geometrical shape in that the posterior apex and the inflexion vertebra shifted significantly more posteriorly compared to the high anterior apex spine (L4/5). Original geometrical spinal shape affected the occurrence of VF, and post-fracture spinal shape depended on the positional relationship between the inflexion vertebra and fractured vertebra. Our study helps to understand the influence of geometrical spinal shape on the risks of VF. 3.

72 Prevalence of Reported and Unreported Vertebral Fractures in Ctpas in Older Adults Above 75 Years

Abstract Introduction Identifying vertebral fractures is prudent in the diagnosis of osteoporosis as they occur early in this hidden condition. Unfortunately, due to their unspecific presentation, only 25% are clinically recognised. Computerised Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA) are frequently requested to confirm pulmonary thromboembolisms, but could also aid in detecting clinically silent vertebral fractures. Current literature suggests that less than one-third of incidental vertebral fractures are reported. The aim of this study is to measure the prevalence of vertebral fractures in CTPA and its relevance to clinical outcomes. Methods This is retrospective observational study based on the analysis of existing CTPA for acutely unwell patients admitted to medical assessment unit or A &amp; E across three acute sites within Aneurin Bevan University Health board, Wales, UK between January and December 2015. All CTPA reports were reviewed for fragility factures and CTPA images were reassessed for any unreported vertebral fractures. Age and gender were recorded for all patients. Analysis was done for all patients in respect to subsequent fragility fractures and mortality. Difference of proportion test was used to compare two groups with and without vertebral fractures. Results 179 CTPA were reviewed, 161 patients were included for further analysis. 14.3% (n=23/161) were reported to have a vertebral fracture, however only 8.7% (n=14/161) of reports used the correct terminology of ‘fracture’. On subsequent review, an additional 24.2% (n=39/161) vertebral fractures were noted. Therefore, overall prevalence of vertebral fractures was 38.5% (n=62/161). Only 9.1% (n=9/99) of patients without a vertebral fracture developed a subsequent fragility fracture. In comparison, 22.5% (n=14/62) of patients with a previous vertebral fracture sustained a new fragility fracture over next 4 years and this was significantly higher (p = 0.017). Overall mortality over 4 years follow-up was significantly higher for patients with vertebral fractures (64.5%, n=40/62) as compared to those without fractures (43.4%, n=43/99, p = 0.009). Only 48.4% (n=30/62) received osteoporosis treatment. Conclusions Vertebral fractures could be underreported by radiologists, likely due to human factors as they might be concentrating on the clinical scenario to exclude a pulmonary embolism. However, considering a significant higher mortality in patients with underlying vertebral fracture, it justifies that radiologists could be asked to examine sagittal view in the bone window for possible underlying vertebral fractures, to ensure osteoporosis is treated to guidance.

Dual-Energy Computed Tomography-Based Display of Bone Marrow Edema in Incidental Vertebral Compression Fractures: Diagnostic Accuracy and Characterization in Oncological Patients Undergoing Routine Staging Computed Tomography.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of virtual noncalcium (VNCa) dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) reconstructions enabling visualization of bone marrow edema for characterization of incidental thoracolumbar compression fractures in routine thoracoabdominal staging computed tomography (CT). We retrospectively analyzed 51 oncological patients without suspected fracture or indicative complaints presenting at least 1 thoracolumbar compression fracture on routine thoracoabdominal staging DECT who had been examined between October 2015 and June 2017 using third-generation dual-source CT, had a previous CT within 3 months before, and also had undergone additional magnetic resonance imaging within 14 days, which served as the standard of reference. Three independent and blinded radiologists initially evaluated all vertebrae on conventional grayscale DECT series; after at least 8 weeks, observers reevaluated all cases using grayscale and color-coded VNCa DECT images. The age of each fracture was determined as either acute, chronic, or inconclusive. Specificity, sensitivity, and intraobserver and interobserver agreements were calculated taking into account clustering. A total of 98 vertebral compression fractures were detected in 51 patients (20 women, 31 men; median of 1 fracture per patient). The reference standard defined 45 as acute and 53 as chronic. For identification of only acute fractures (cutoff 1), the combination of grayscale and VNCa image series showed a higher sensitivity (91% vs 47%; P < 0.001) but equal specificity (both 100%) compared with analysis of grayscale images alone. When defining a positive finding as a fracture considered either acute or inconclusive (cutoff 2), combined analysis of grayscale and VNCa images showed similar sensitivity (96% vs 93%; P = 0.28) but significantly higher specificity (96% vs 75%; P < 0.001) compared with evaluation of grayscale images alone. Area under the curve analysis for detection of vertebral compression fractures showed superior results for reading of grayscale and VNCa image series (0.98) compared with analysis of grayscale images alone (0.89; P < 0.001). Dual-energy CT-derived color-coded VNCa reconstructions substantially improve the characterization of incidental thoracolumbar compression fractures seen on routine thoracoabdominal staging DECT by allowing for visualization of bone marrow edema.

Skeletal Consequences of Nephropathic Cystinosis.

Nephropathic cystinosis is a rare lysosomal storage disorder. Patients present in the first year of life with renal Fanconi syndrome that evolves to progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite the multiple risk factors for bone disease, the frequency and severity of skeletal disorders in nephropathic cystinosis have not been described. We performed systematic bone and mineral evaluations of subjects with cystinosis seen at the NIH (n = 30), including history and physical examination, serum and urine biochemistries, DXA, vertebral fracture assessment, skeletal radiographs, and renal ultrasound. Additionally, histomorphometric analyses are reported on six subjects seen at the UCLA Bone and Mineral Metabolism Clinic. In NIH subjects, mean age was 20 years (range, 5 to 44 years), 60% were CKD stages G1 to G4, and 40% had a renal transplant. Mean bone mineral density (BMD) Z-scores were decreased in the femoral neck, total hip, and 1/3 radius (p < 0.05). Low bone mass at one or more sites was present in 46% of subjects. Twenty-seven percent of subjects reported one or more long bone fractures. Thirty-two percent of subjects had incidental vertebral fractures, which were unrelated to transplant status. Long-bone deformity/bowing was present in 64%; 50% had scoliosis. Diffuse osteosclerosis was present in 21% of evaluated subjects. Risk factors included CKD, phosphate wasting, hypercalciuria, secondary hyperparathyroidism, hypovitaminosis D, male hypogonadism, metabolic acidosis, and glucocorticoid/immunosuppressive therapy. Sixty-one percent of the non-transplanted subjects had ultrasonographic evidence of nephrocalcinosis or nephrolithiasis. Histomorphometric analyses showed impaired mineralization in four of six studied subjects. We conclude that skeletal deformities, decreased bone mass, and vertebral fractures are common and relevant complications of nephropathic cystinosis, even before renal transplantation. Efforts to minimize risk factors for skeletal disease include optimizing mineral metabolism and hormonal status, combined with monitoring for nephrocalcinosis/nephrolithiasis. © 2018 This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

L1 vertebral density on CT is too variable with different scanning protocols to be a useful screening tool for osteoporosis in everyday practice.

To determine whether a single L1 density threshold can be used to screen all patients undergoing CT at a busy tertiary referral centre for those at risk of osteoporosis. 200 patients, who had been randomly selected for an audit of CT reporting of incidental vertebral fractures, had their L1 density measured on 864 routine CT examinations. These had been performed with a variety of kVp and intravenous (i.v.) contrast protocols, reflecting the wide range of imaging indications. L1 density measured on thick axial, thin axial or sagittal images had an excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (0.996). For the same patients imaged twice within 6 months, there was mean intraexamination L1 density difference of 27.5 HU. Variability due to i.v. contrast medium administration resulted in a mean difference of 24.5 HU. Mean difference due to acquisition kVp was 24.1 HU. Once matched for sex, age, kVp and i.v. contrast, there was a significant difference between the L1 density in patients with vertebral fractures compared to those without fractures (mean 30.19 HU). There is significant variability in the L1 vertebral body CT density due to differences in acquisition variables such as kVp and timing post-i.v. contrast medium. Advances in knowledge: Previous studies suggested that L1 CT density could be used to screen for osteoporosis. The current study cautions that it is not possible to define a single L1 density threshold for screening, due to the number of variables within a wide range of scanning protocols for different imaging indications in everyday practice.

Reporting of vertebral fragility fractures: can radiologists help reduce the number of hip fractures?

SummaryPatients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures are at increased risk of hip fracture. In a cohort of hip fracture patients, many had previous imaging studies showing incidental vertebral fractures. Fifty-four percent of fractures were not reported by the radiologist, highlighting a missed opportunity for diagnosing and treating osteoporosis, thereby preventing further fractures.PurposePatients with osteoporotic vertebral fragility fractures (VFFs) are at increased risk of future fractures, including hip fractures. Treating osteoporosis in these patients has the potential to reduce the risk of subsequent hip fractures, which are associated with high morbidity, mortality and cost. In this retrospective cohort study, we investigated the reporting and follow-up of VFFs evident on imaging by radiologists at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford.Materials and methodsData from the local Fracture Liaison Service was used to case-find all incident hip fractures from 2013 presenting to the trust. We then identified patients who had also undergone a radiological procedure that included the thoracic and/or lumbar spine in the previous 6 years. All identified radiological images were re-examined for the presence of VFFs using the Genant semi-quantitative method.ResultsSeven hundred and thirty-two patients over the age of 50 with a hip fracture in 2013 were identified. One hundred and fifty-seven patients had previously undergone a radiological procedure involving the spine, and VFFs were identified in 65/157 (41%). Of these, only 30/65 (46%) were reported by a radiologist when the fracture was first visible. 32/35 (91%) of unreported VFFs were from imaging reported by non-musculoskeletal radiologists. Only 16/65 (25%) of patients with a VFF were documented as being on bone-specific therapy at the time of hip fracture.ConclusionsOur study highlights the under-reporting of osteoporotic vertebral fractures, particularly by non-musculoskeletal radiologists. Better systems for reporting and referring osteoporotic VFFs are necessary to increase the number of patients receiving appropriate osteoporosis treatment.

203. Identification and Reporting of Incidental Vertebral Fractures Found in Non-Musculoskeletal Computerized Tomography Imaging

203. Identification and Reporting of Incidental Vertebral Fractures Found in Non-Musculoskeletal Computerized Tomography Imaging

Interventions to Increase Osteoporosis Treatment in Patients with ‘Incidentally’ Detected Vertebral Fractures

BackgroundMost vertebral compression fractures are not recognized or treated. We conducted a controlled trial in older patients with vertebral fractures incidentally reported on chest radiographs, comparing usual care with osteoporosis interventions directed at physicians (opinion-leader-endorsed evidence summaries and reminders) or physicians+patients (adding activation with leaflets and telephone counseling). MethodsPatients aged >60 years who were discharged home from emergency departments and who had vertebral fractures reported but were not treated for osteoporosis were allocated to usual care (control) or physician intervention using alternate-week time series. After 3 months, untreated controls were re-allocated to physician+patient intervention. Allocation was concealed, outcomes ascertainment blinded, and analyses intent-to-treat. Primary outcome was starting osteoporosis treatment within 3 months. ResultsThere were 1315 consecutive patients screened, and 240 allocated to control (n=123) or physician intervention (n=117). Groups were similar at baseline (average age 74 years, 45% female, 58% previous fractures). Compared with controls, physician interventions significantly (all P <.001) increased osteoporosis treatment (20 [17%] vs 2 [2%]), bone mineral density testing (51 [44%] vs 5 [4%]), and bone mineral density testing or treatment (57 [49%] vs 7 [6%]). Three months after controls were re-allocated to physician+patient interventions, 22% had started treatment and 65% had bone mineral density testing or treatment (P <.001 vs controls). Physician+patient interventions increased bone mineral density testing or treatment an additional 16% compared with physician interventions (P=.01). ConclusionsAn opinion-leader-based intervention targeting physicians substantially improved rates of bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis treatment in patients with incidental vertebral fractures, compared with usual care. Even better osteoporosis management was achieved by adding patient activation to physician interventions [NCT00388908].

Detection of incidental vertebral fractures in breast imaging: the potential role of MR localisers

Incidental diagnosis of vertebral fractures (VFs) may represent a key point in the assessment of bone health status. Our purpose was to retrospectively evaluate localisation sequences (MR-loc) of breast MRI as a potential tool to detect osteoporotic VFs. MR-loc sagittal images of 856 breast MRIs were reviewed by three expert musculoskeletal radiologists with a semiquantitative approach to detecting VFs. Anamnesis and data of patients were investigated. Official breast MRI and previous imaging reports were checked to understand if VFs or other relevant bone findings were known in patients' clinical history. A total of 780/856 female patients (91.1 %) undergoing MRI for oncological reasons and 76/856 (8.9 %) with non-oncological aims were recruited into the study (54.7 ± 12.2 years old, 21-89 years); 57/856 MR-loc images (6.7 %) were considered inadequate for diagnostic purposes and were excluded from the analysis. MR-loc detected VFs in 71/799 patients (8.9 %). VFs were neither reported nor previously known in the clinical history of 63/71 patients (88.7 %; P < 0.001). No mention of VFs was found in any breast MR reports. In four patients MR-loc identified vertebral metastases. A systematic evaluation of MR-loc may offer additional clinical information to prevent unrecognised VFs. MR-loc may screen for VFs in other imaging settings. Vertebral fractures are usually a hallmark of osteoporosis. Localisation sequences before breast MR examinations can identify vertebral fractures. MR localisers should be inspected for vertebral fractures in other clinical settings.

Prevention and treatment of side-effects of systemic treatment: bone loss

Cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) is generally more rapid and severe than bone loss associated with menopause in women or ageing in men and women. In premenopausal women with breast cancer, CTIBL is mainly caused by chemotherapy with resultant ovarian failure, by GnRH agonists or by tamoxifen. In postmenopausal women, steroidal and non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs) increase bone turnover, decrease bone mass and increase fracture rate (hazard ratio increased to 1.38-1.55 compared with tamoxifen). Zoledronic acid can prevent bone loss in premenopausal women receiving adjuvant therapy with goserelin in combination with either anastrozole or tamoxifen and in postmenopausal women receiving AIs. Denosumab has been shown in a placebo-controlled study to significantly increase bone mineral density in postmenopausal women under AIs. More limited studies indicate that oral bisphosphonates used at licensed doses for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis can also prevent AI-induced bone loss. In prostate cancer, bone loss that occurs with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) also leads to an increased fracture rate. The bisphosphonates pamidronate and alendronate can prevent bone loss whereas zoledronic acid can increase bone mass under ADT. As for breast cancer, delay in bisphosphonate therapy is detrimental to bone health. The protective effects of denosumab on bone loss and incidental vertebral fractures have been demonstrated in a 3-year placebo-controlled trial.

Incidental vertebral compression fractures in imaging studies: Lessons not learned by radiologists

To assess radiologists reporting rates of incidental vertebral compression fractures in imaging studies. We performed a review of the current literature on the prevalence and reporting rates of incidental vertebral compression fractures in radiologic examinations. The bibliographic search revealed 12 studies: 7 studies using conventional radiology and 5 using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). The loss of height cut-off to define a vertebral fracture varied from 15% to 25%. Fracture prevalence was high (mean 21.1%; range 9.5%-35%) in both radiographic and MDCT studies (mean 21.6% and 20.2%, respectively). Reporting rates were low with a mean value of 27.4% (range 0%-66.3%) and were significantly lower in MDCT than in radiographic studies (mean 8.1% vs 41.1%). Notably, recent studies showed lower reporting rates than older studies. Many scientific studies have confirmed a high prevalence of vertebral compression fractures as incidental findings on imaging studies. However, the underreporting of these fractures, as determined in our study, may negatively affect patient care.

Missed incidental vertebral compression fractures on computed tomography imaging: More optimism justified

Missed incidental vertebral compression fractures on computed tomography (CT) imaging are a common problem. Although numerous publications are available on this topic, recent publications still show a high percentage of such missed fractures. The rate of such missed fractures in the authors department is much lower than that in the reported literature when routine multiplanar reconstructions are used for reporting CT scans. Therefore, a more optimistic view on this topic seems to be justified.