Incidental Dural Tear Research Articles

Incidental dural tears during pediatric posterior spinal fusions

PurposeTo characterize the frequency of incidental dural tears in pediatric spine surgery, their treatment, complications, and results of long-term follow-up.MethodsA retrospective review of all pediatric patients who underwent a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) between 2004–2019 at a tertiary children’s hospital was conducted. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient demographics, intra-operative data, presence of an incidental dural tear, repair method, and patient outcomes.Results3043 PSFs were reviewed, with 99 dural tears identified in 94 patients (3.3% overall incidence). Mean follow-up was 35.7 months (range 0.1–142.5). When the cause of the dural tear was specified, 69% occurred during exposure, 5% during pedicle screw placement, 4% during osteotomy, 2% during removal of implants, and 2% during intra-thecal injection of morphine. The rate of dural tears during primary PSF was significantly lower than during revision PSF procedures (2.6% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.05). 86.9% of dural tears were repaired and/or sealed intraoperatively, while 13.1% had spontaneous resolution. Postoperative headaches developed in 13.1% of patients and resolved at a mean of 7.6 days. There was no difference in the incidence of headaches in patients that were ordered bedrest vs. no bedrest (p > 0.99). Postoperative infections occurred in 9.5% of patients and 24.1% patients were identified to have undergone a revision surgery.ConclusionsIncidence of intra-operative dural tears in pediatric spine surgery is 3.3%. Although complications associated with the dural tear occur, most resolve over time and there were no long-term sequelae in patients with 2 years of follow up.Level of evidenceLevel IV.

Spontaneous Thoracic Dural Tear Presenting With Postural Headache: A Case Report

BACKGROUND: Incidental dural tear (durotomy) is a known complication of many forms of spinal instrumentation. The majority of durotomy cases are due to a known traumatic force, such as an intentional durotomy during neuraxial anesthesia, or an unintentional tear during lumbar decompression surgery. However, spontaneous dural tears have occasionally been reported. CASE REPORT: We report a case of a 16-year-old woman with postural headaches who was found to have a spontaneous thoracic dural tear on magnetic resonance imaging. She underwent a successful fluoroscopic-guided epidural blood patch with resolution of symptoms. CONCLUSION: This case highlights the importance of considering spontaneous dural tears as a possible cause of postural headaches. KEY WORDS: Spontaneous dural tear, traumatic dural tear, idiopathic dural tear, durotomy, post-dural postural headache, epidural blood patch, headache, CSF leak, case report

Incidental dural tears do not affect the overall patients' reported outcome of spine surgery at long-term follow-up: results of a systematic review.

To conduct a systematic review of the literature in order to establish if there is an overall adverse effect of accidental durotomy on the long-term patients' reported outcome after elective spine surgery. A systematic literature search was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data about pre- and postoperative clinical outcomes of patients with accidental durotomy and patients without were extracted and analysed. After screening, eleven studies were included with a total of 80,541 patients. About 4112 of these patients (5.10%) had incidental dural tear. When comparing patients with dural tear to patients without, 9/11 authors found no patients' reported differences at last follow-up. One author found a slightly worse VAS back pain in dural tear patients, and another author found inferior SF-36 and ODI scores in dural tear patients (both below minimal clinically important difference). Accidental dural tear did not have a significant adverse effect on clinical outcome of elective spine surgery. More studies are needed to better demonstrate this result.

80. Early mobilization after incidental durotomy: a systematic review

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> The conventional management of incidental dural tears involving a prolonged period of flat bed rest is highly debatable. There is no consensus regarding the need or ideal duration of postoperative bed rest following these dural tears. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> To systematically evaluate the relevant literature regarding the outcomes of mobilization within 24 hours after incidental durotomy with respect to the length of hospital stay, minor complications and reoperation rates. The data were compared to that of later mobilization (after 24 hours). <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> A systematic review and meta-analysis. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> Overall, 533 patients (mean age 61.1 years) had an incidental dural tear and were mobilized within 24 hours. Additionally, 203 patients of mean age 72.8 years (6 studies) were mobilized after 24 hours (24 – 144 hours). <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> We aimed to measure hospital stay, minor complications and reoperation rates in early mobilized patients after incidental durotomies. <h3>METHODS</h3> A systematic review of the English language literature dating to December 2021, was undertaken using search criteria ([dural tear or durotomy] and [mobilization or bed rest]) and the PRISMA guidelines. Isolated case reports were excluded. <h3>RESULTS</h3> The average hospital stay for early mobilized patients was 3.65 days. Twenty-two out of 533 (4.1%) patients (11 studies) had a major complication that required reoperation while the rate of minor complications was 27 out of 230 (11.7%) (9 studies). Comparing early to late mobilization, there was a significant reduction in the risk of minor complications due to early mobilization (13/102 [12.7%] vs 33/106 [31.1%] RR: 0.47, 95CI: 0.27, 0.80), but no significant difference in major complications (3 studies) (12/106 [11.3%] vs 11/134 [8.2%] RR: 1.55, 95CI: 0.72, 3.35). <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> This systematic review compared early and late mobilisers after incidental durotomies, finding that minor complications including headaches, nausea, tinnitus and vomiting were, in fact, significantly reduced with early mobilization. Indeed, early mobilization within 24 hours after incidental dural tears appears to be safe and did not need lead to a significantly higher re-operation rate compared to more prolonged bed rest. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

NATIONWIDE SURVEY ON INCIDENTAL DURAL TEARS DURING ENDOSCOPIC SPINE SURGERY IN JAPAN

Purpose: The Japanese Orthopedic Association has conducted a nationwide survey on the status of endoscopic spine surgery in Japan every year since 2006. This study aimed to analyze incidental dural tear. Method:We sent questionnaires to all spine surgery hospitals in Japan and received responses from an average of 1296 hospitals (974–1746) each year. The average response rate for the questionnaire was 63.7% (45.2–85.8). Results:The average number of facilities performing endoscopic spine surgery was 314 (222–415). The percentage of facilities performing endoscopic procures was 24.3% (20.3–27.3%). Incidental dural tear accounted for 65.4% (3113/4758) of all complications, which was significantly higher than nerve root injuries, cauda equina injuries (4.6%), and hematomas (10.0%). The number of accidents resulting in harm to patients was 154 (3.6%) for incidental dural tear which was significantly less than that for hematoma (75.5%) and for nerve root cauda equina injury (49.5%). Conclusion:As the number of endoscopic procedures increased, the number of complications increased year by year. However, the rate of complications has remained constant, with incidental durotomy tending to be the most common endoscopic lumbar laminectomy for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Nerve root herniation with entrapment in the facet joint gap after lumbar decompression surgery: a case presentation

BackgroundAn incidental dural tear is a well-known complication during spine surgery. A rare consequence is a postoperative nerve root herniation. The purpose of this report is to describe a case of such a herniation with entrapment in the facet gap joint and to present the first MR images of this rare surgical complication.Case presentationWe report a case of a patient who underwent lumbar decompression surgery and afterwards suffered a sudden intractable sciatica. Postoperative MRI showed a new facet joint gap effusion. During revision surgery an entrapped nerve root was found in the facet joint gap. In retrospective, the herniated nerve root is visible on postoperative MRI.ConclusionThis case report highlights a rare complication during spine surgery. This finding is important as signs suggestive for nerve root herniation can easily be overlooked on MRI. Furthermore, this represents the first MRI documentation of this complication.

Clinical Outcomes of Incidental Dural Tears During Lumbar Microdiscectomy.

Background: A dural tear (DT) is the most commonly encountered complication during lumbar spine surgery. The incidence of DT increases depending on the complexity of the surgical procedure and the presence of a DT is related to a poor outcome and patient satisfaction.Objectives: This study aimed to determine the incidence and clinical outcomes of DTs in those patients who undergo lumbar disc surgery.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent surgery for the management of a primary single-level lumbar disc herniation at a single institution between 2004 and 2014. Among the studied population, those with DTs were included in the study group. An age- and sex-matched group of randomly selected patients who underwent the same level and type of lumbar spine surgery, but did not develop DTs, were assigned as the control group. The outcomes were compared at 12 months postoperatively between the groups.Results: A total of 5,476 consecutive patients (2,608 female, 2,868 male; mean age, 54 ± 11.45 [range, 21-86] years) underwent surgery for primary single-level lumbar disc herniation. DT was noted in 192 (2.85%) cases. Of these, 102 patients with complete data were included in the DT group. The DT group had a significantly increased length of hospital stay (p = 0.001). Also, the duration of bed rest in the hospital was significantly higher in patients wherein DT was repaired using hemostatic material and fibrin glue, compared to the patients with primary closure with suturing of the tear.Conclusion: Incidental DTs, if recognized and treated appropriately, will not lead to poor clinical results and do not adversely impact postoperative outcomes.

Risk Factors and Options of Management for an Incidental Dural Tear in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery.

Study DesignHere we perform a retrospective analysis regarding an incidental dural tear (IDT) during biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS).PurposeThis study investigates the causes of IDT specifically related to technical procedures of BESS with the aim of lowering its risk during training.Overview of LiteratureThe incidence of dural tear is reported 0.5%–18% in open spinal surgery and 1.7%–4.3% during endoscopic spinal surgery. Because conversion to open surgery for direct repair could become necessary during endoscopic spinal surgery, prevention of this complication is essential.MethodsWe have retrospectively studied IDTs by four surgeons during 1 or 2 years after starting BESS for lumbar degenerative diseases and analyzed the locations, sizes, and specific endoscopic conditions specific to each.ResultsTwenty-five cases (1.6%) of IDTs among 1,551 cases of BESS occurred; 13 cases (52%) of these were within the first 6 months. The locations were dorsal midline in 12 cases, ipsilateral side in 11 cases, and contralateral side in two cases. The tear sizes were <10 mm in 20 cases and ≥10 mm in five cases. IDT commonly occurred due to injury of central dural folding during flavectomy under turbid surgical fields due to small bleeds under water. Twenty cases with IDTs of <10 mm were treated well with the patch technique. Among five cases of ≥10 mm, three underwent open repair within a few days, and two of these which failed to conservative management required a delayed revision operation due to pseudomeningocele. No cases progressed to surgical site infection or infectious spondylitis.ConclusionsIDTs of <10 mm can be successfully treated with the patch technique. To prevent IDT during the early learning period, maintaining clear visibility by securing fluent saline outflow and meticulous hemostasis of small bleeding from exposed cancellous bone and epidural vessels is essential with caution not to injure the central dural folding during midline flavectomy.

Dural Tears in Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Anatomical Location and Management

To determine the rate and anatomical location of dural tears associated with spinal surgery using a percutaneous biportal endoscopic surgery (PBES) technique. We investigated the relationship between dural tears and the type of procedure and type of instrument used. We retrospectively analyzed 643 PBES cases by reviewing the medical records, operative records, and operative videos. Incidental durotomy was identified in 29cases. We analyzed the size and anatomical location of the dural tears, the surgical instrument that caused the tear, and the technique used to seal the tear. The dural tear incidence was 4.5% (29 of 643 cases). Tears in the exiting nerve area (2 cases; 6.9%) had mainly been caused by curettage, tears in the thecal sac area (18 cases; 62.1%) were associated with electric drill and forceps use; and tears in the traversing nerve area were associated with the use of a Kerrison punch (9 cases; 31%). Of the 29 cases of dural tear, 12 were treated with in-hospital monitoring and bed rest, 14 were treated with a fibrin sealant, 2 were treated with a nonpenetrating titanium clip, and 1 was converted to microscopic surgery. One case of postoperative meningocele after conservative treatment required endoscopic revision surgery to close the dural tear. Most cases of incidental dural tear during PBES were treated with an endoscopic procedure. The incidence of dural tear was no greater than that associated with microscopic surgery. Our management strategy for incidental dural tears during PBES has been shown to be safe and effective.

Invasiveness has no influence on the rate of incidental durotomies in surgery for multisegmental lumbar spinal canal stenosis (≥3 levels) with and without fusion: analysis from the German Spine Registry data (DWG-Register).

Nowadays, perioperative complications as dural tear (DT) with subsequent neurological deficits are documented in independent registers. However, the relationship of these complications with the grade of invasiveness (≥3 levels) is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate perioperative complications, particularly DT with subsequent neurological deficits, between patients undergoing laminotomy and decompression and decompression and fusion in ≥3 levels. Retrospective analysis of the data pool of the DWG register based on cases described by 10 clinics between January 2012 and December 2016 was performed. Surgically treated LSS in ≥3 segments were divided into decompression with or without instrumentation and fusion. Cases with intraoperative DT in both subgroups were analysed for risk factor occurrence. The Surgical Invasive Index (SII) was used. DT occurred in 102/941 (10.8%) patients. Difference in DT between groups was non-significant. The likelihood of DT increased by 2.12-fold with previous spinal surgery at the same level and by 1.9-fold for BMI 30-34 and >35 in comparison with BMI 26-29, respectively. Postoperative deep wound infection was increased by 2.39-fold after DT than without. Significance in outcomes between patients with/without DT was not found. The invasiveness index explained 48% of the variation in blood loss and 51% of the variation in surgery duration. The rate of incidental DT during decompression for LSS with and without fusion in ≥3 levels was associated with BMI and previous surgery at the same spinal level. Invasivness (SII) is valid rather for variables proper to surgery such as bledding and Op-time but no with incidence for DT and subsequent CSF-leackage.

Radiographic and clinical outcomes of huge lumbar disc herniations treated by transforaminal endoscopic discectomy

ObjectivesLarge Central disc herniations (occupying more than 50% of canal area) are notorious as they are generally associated with worse outcomes and are technically difficult to manage. Transforaminal endoscopy (TELD) has evolved to become an interesting alternative for lumbar disc herniations. The aim of the paper is to review our technique of transforaminal endoscopy in large central disc herniations and describe the clinical and radiographic results. We also describe an innovative technique of intraoperative epidurography to assess the adequacy of decompression in some cases with severe canal compromise. Patients and methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of all the patients undergoing TELD from December 2012 to October 2018 for huge central lumbar disc herniations. The procedure was done under local anaesthesia and required a more horizontal approach angle, undercutting of superior articular process and posterior annular release to reach the herniated fragment in the epidural space. In severe cases, a radiopaque dye was introduced via trans-sacral catheter to check the adequacy of decompression. The disc height, lumbar lordosis, segmental lordotic angle on standing radiographs and Canal cross sectional area(CSA) on MRI were evaluated preoperatively and compared with postoperative images at the end of 1 year/final follow-up. The Visual analogue scale(VAS) for Back and Leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI), MacNab criteria, return to daily activities, return to work, patient satisfaction rate and recommendation to others were the clinical outcomes evaluated. The percentage of patients achieving the Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 3 points for VAS and 12 points for ODI was calculated. ResultsA total of 18 patients, with an average age of 35.1years (range 20–61), were operated. The mean VAS back improved from 5.7(±1.77) to 1(±0.77) and VAS leg improved from 7.3(±1.37) to 1.1(±1.09). The ODI improved from 49.88(±11.42) to 13.88(±7.28) at final follow-up. According to MacNab criteria, 17 patients had excellent and 1 had good outcome at final follow-up. The patient satisfaction rate was 90.5%, with 94% patient recommendation rate. All the patients returned to daily activities and work/modified work within a median of 5 weeks. There was 1 patient who required conversion to open surgery due to incidental dural tear, 1 patient who had a remnant disc required a revision tubular discectomy and 1 patient who had recurrence at 6 weeks and again at 2 years which was treated by repeat TELD. Five patients had impending cauda equina. All the patients achieved the MCID for VAS and ODI within a median period of 6 weeks and 3 months, respectively. The recovery rate was 90.1%. Five patients had grade 4 weakness of great toe/ankle dorsiflexion, one also had ankle flexion weakness preoperatively which improved after surgery. The CSA improved from a preoperative mean of 62.26(±30.3)mm2 to 122.16(±56.5)mm2 postoperatively. The CSA improved to 141.05(±63.86)mm2 at 1 year followup. The average disc height which was 9.71 mm(±2.4) was maintained at follow-up of one year which was 9.21 mm(±2.4). The lumbar lordosis and segmental lordotic angle changed from 27.08°(±15.9) and 2.82°(±5.7) to 35.8°(±8.56) and 4.85°(±4.39) respectively. ConclusionTELD may be considered as an alternative to microdiscectomy or fusion procedures for huge central disc herniations with favourable outcomes. However, sufficient expertise with the procedure is necessary. Intraoperative decompression may be confirmed with intraoperative epidurography. The patient acceptability of the procedure is good and causes minimal disruption of the normal anatomy.

Results of TachoSil® associated with fibrin glue as dural sealant in a series of patients with spinal intradural tumors surgery. Technical note with a review of the literature

A major problem of surgery for intradural spinal tumors (IST) is the occurrence in the post-operative period of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak. To the best of our knowledge, here we report on the largest series of IST patients in whom the TachoSil® associated to fibrin glue was used as dural sealant in this kind of surgery. Moreover, we extensively reviewed the literature reporting the results of TachoSil® in spine surgery. The data of 35 consecutive surgically treated IST patients were reviewed. In all cases TachoSil® associated with fibrin glue was used as dural sealant. Mean age was 58.14 ± 15.56 years and mean follow-up (FU) was 23.20 ± 9.76 months. The Modified McCormick Scale (MMS) was used to assess the functional status of patients pre-operatively and at latest FU. All article dealing with the use of TachoSil® in spine surgery were included in the literature review. A CSF collection (treated conservatively with needle aspiration and bed rest with no consequence) was observed only in 1 out of 35 cases. No wound infection nor adverse reaction to the TachoSil® occurred during the FU. At latest FU we observed an improvement of MMS grade in 23 patients (65.71%) and a stable functional status in 12 cases (34.28%). According to our experience and the literature review using the TachoSil® after dural closure is safe and effective in IST surgery. Better standardized studies are needed to establish the usefulness of TachoSil® for incidental dural tear in degenerative spine surgery.

Management of Dural Tears in Endoscopic Lumbar Spinal Surgery: A Review of the Literature

The incidental dural tear is a common complication in lumbar spine surgery. It has been reported that the incidence of dural tears is much greater in endoscopic procedures. Primary closure via suturing remains challenging in endoscopic procedures. The objective of this study was to conduct a literature review on the surgical technique for dural closure and repair in endoscopic spine surgery. A systematic literature search was performed using the database PubMed. In total, 12 studies reported specifically about the surgical treatment for dural tear in percutaneous and tubular assisted endoscopic technique. The dural tear rate, the technique of dural closure, postoperative time of bed rest, postoperative symptoms related to cerebrospinal fluid fistula, and revision surgery were assessed. The overall rate of dural tears in endoscopic spinal surgery was 2.7%, with a range from 0% to 8.6%. The incidence of a dural tear was much greater in cases with lumbar stenosis (3.7%) than in lumbar disc herniation (2.1%). The greatest rate was accompanied by resecting synovial cysts. In addition, the risk of dural tear is greater in bilateral decompression procedures via a unilateral approach. There is no consensus about the ideal technique for dural closure in endoscopic procedures. Furthermore, there is a debate whether dural tear requires surgical treatment or not. An autologous muscle or fat graft in combination with fibrin glue or a fibrin-sealed collagen sponge seems to be a good and safe method for the management of dural tear in lumbar endoscopic spine surgery.

SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy for congenital thoracolumbar kyphosis: a minimum of 2 years follow-up study.

Several osteotomy techniques including pedicle subtraction osteotomy and vertebral column resection have been employed in the correction of congenital kyphosis (CK) and satisfying outcomes have been demonstrated. However, the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy, defined as resection of posterior elements, partial vertebral body, and superior adjacent disc, is rarely reported in the treatment of CK. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy in patients with CK, and to propose its optimal indication. This is a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients with CK undergoing SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy. Patients with thoracolumbar CK undergoing SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy from January 2010 to May 2015 followed up for at least 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. The thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, segmental kyphosis (SK), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope were measured on lateral spinal x-rays. Patients were required to fulfill the SRS-22 questionnaire at preoperation and the last follow-up. The sagittal spinal-pelvic parameters were assessed at preoperation, postoperation, and last follow-up. The comparison between preoperation and postoperation was performed by paired samples t test. A total of 38 patients with CK (17 male and 21 female) with an average age of 16.5±9.9 years were included. The mean operating time was 242.7±88.1 minutes and blood loss was 634.5±177.8 mL. The mean follow-up was 38.8±20.3 months. The SK was 49.5±11.7° at preoperation, 6.8±7.4° at postoperation (p<.001), and 8.0±8.1° at the last follow-up. No significant correction loss during follow-up was found in SK (p=.125). The SVA was improved from -36.0±18.3 mm at preoperation to 3.7±17.8 mm at postoperation (p<.001), and the correction was well maintained during follow-up (p=.113). Compared with preoperation, the mean postoperative scores of each domains of SRS-22 questionnaire improved at different levels. Intraoperative complications included one case with incidental dural tear and another with transient root injury. Proximal junctional kyphosis occurred in three patients at 6 months after operation and remained stable during the follow-up. At the last follow-up, all patients were identified to have achieved solid bony fusion. The SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy, if selected appropriately, could provide satisfying correction of congenital kyphosis. The correction could be well maintained during the longitudinal follow-up.

Evaluation and management of small dural tears in primary lumbar spinal decompression and discectomy surgery

Incidental dural tear is one of the most common intraoperative complications in lumbar spine surgery. Yet, its technical management for the prevention of CSF leak is controversial. The technique of managing dural tears depends on the location of the dural tears as well on the length and anatomical characteristics of the dural tear. We propose an anatomical classification for small (less than one cm) dural tears and report on the outcome of managing these dural tears types using different technique for different type.62 patients underwent spinal dural repair after microdiscectomy or lumbar spinal decompression. Group 1 consisted of 20 patients, with Type I or mild dural tear who had tissue-glue coated collagen sponge or fibrin glue application. Group 2 comprised 21 patients with Type II or moderate dural tear who had both tissue-glue coated collagen sponge and fibrin glue application. Group 3 comprised 21 patients with Type III or severe dural tear who had polypropylene suture and tissue-glue coated collagen sponge and/or fibrin glue application. Evident postoperative CSF leak was used to determine the patient’s postoperative result. Postoperative CSF leak was not evident during a minimum 1 year follow up in group 1. Internal CSF leak was evident in group 2 (n = 3) and group 3 (n = 3) during same follow up. Three patients underwent re-do spinal surgery for CSF leak repair. We recommend different management technique depending on the type of tear. For type I, we recommend the use of tissue-glue coated collagen sponge or fibrin glue application, without dural suturing.

Incidental durotomy in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcomes in the Spine Tango registry.

The three aims of this Spine Tango registry study of patients undergoing decompression for spinal stenosis were to: report the rate of dural tear (DT) stratified by treatment centre; find factors associated with an increased likelihood of incurring a DT; and compare treatment outcomes in relation to DT (none vs. repaired vs. unrepaired DT). Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between DT and patient and treatment characteristics. Patient-rated and surgical outcomes were compared in patients with no DT, repaired DT, and unrepaired DT, while adjusting for case-mix. DT occurred in 328/3254 (10.1%) of included patients. The rate for all 29 contributing hospitals was within 95% confidence intervals of the average. The likelihood of DT increased by 2% per year of age, 1.78 times with previous spine surgery, 1.67 for a minimally/less invasive surgery, 1.58 times with laminectomy, and 1.40, and 2.12 times for BMI 31-35, and >35 in comparison with BMI 26-30, respectively. The majority of DTs (272/328; 82.9%) were repaired. Repairing the DT was associated with a longer duration of surgery (p<0.001). More patients with repaired than with unrepaired DTs were satisfied with treatment, but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no association between DT and patient-reported outcomes. The unadjusted rate of incidental DT during decompression for LSS was homogeneous across the participating centres and was associated with age, BMI, previous surgery at the same spinal level, minimally/less invasive surgery, and laminectomy. Non-repair of DTs had no negative association with treatment outcome; however, the unrepaired DTs may have been those that were smaller in size.

Management of Incidental Dural Tear During Lumbar Spine Surgery. To Suture or Not to Suture?

Incidental durotomy (ID) during lumbar spine surgery is a frequent complication of growing clinical relevance as the number and complexity of spinal procedures increases. Yet, there is still a lack of guidelines for the treatment of ID with a large heterogeneity of established surgical techniques. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of dural suturing in patients having ID during degenerative lumbar spine surgery, compared with other dural closure techniques. Of 1173 consecutive patients undergoing degenerative lumbar spine surgery from July 2013 to March 2015, in 64 (5.4%) patients 69 (5.8%) IDs occurred. The patients were divided into 3 groups depending on the dural closure technique used: group A, sole dural suture (n = 12, 19%); group B, patch only (TachoSil and/or muscle and/or fat) (n = 22, 32%); group C, dural suture in combination with a patch (n = 34, 49%). The primary end point was revision surgery caused by complications of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after 6 weeks. The secondary end points were operation time and hospitalization time, as well as surgical morbidity. The 3 groups showed no significant difference in rates of revision surgery (group A: n = 1, 1.4%; group B: n = 4, 5.8%; group C: n = 3; 4.3%; P = 0.5). Furthermore, no significant difference for hospitalization time, operation time, and clinical outcome was found. Extent of ID, American Society of Anesthesiology score, postoperative immobilization, and insertion of a drainage tube were not associated with higher rates of revision surgery. Applying suction once a drainage tube was placed was found to be a significant risk factor for revision surgery (P = 0.003). Furthermore, patients undergoing revision surgery had a significantly higher body mass index (33 kg/m(2) vs. 26.37 kg/m(2); P = 0.006; odds ratio 1.252; P = 0.004). Based on our results, the dural closure technique after ID does not seem to influence revision surgery rates due to cerebrospinal fluid leakage and its complications. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm our results.

Management of Incidental Dural Tear during Lumbar Spine Surgery. To Suture or Not To Suture?

Management of Incidental Dural Tear during Lumbar Spine Surgery. To Suture or Not To Suture?

Incidental Dural Tear in Cervical Spine Surgery

This was a retrospective study. To report the incidence of incidental dural tear (DT) in cervical spine surgery, risk factors, and in-hospital patient outcomes on a national level. DT during cervical spine surgery is not as common as that during lumbar spine surgery; however, DT is still a difficult complication. Clinical data were obtained from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 2009. Patients who underwent cervical spine surgery were identified and divided into those with and without DT according to the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification codes. The patient and health care system-related demographic data were retrieved. The incidence of DT and patient outcomes were analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for DT. The incidence of DT was 0.45% (855/190,021). The multivariate analysis revealed that a diagnosis of myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; posterior approach, anterior and posterior approach; and insurance status were the significant risk factors for DT. Comparison between patients with and without DT showed that those with DT had significantly higher overall in-hospital complications (21.6% vs. 7.3%), longer hospital stays (6.0 vs. 3.2 d), a lower proportion who were discharged home routinely (66.3% vs. 83.9%), increased total hospital costs ($96,424 vs. $62,416), and similar in-hospital mortality (0.6% vs. 0.4%). The incidence of DT in cervical spine surgery was 0.45% in the United States. The risk of DT was highest with a primary diagnosis of the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (58.4 times). DT significantly increased the rate of in-hospital complications and health care burden.

Outcome of Incidental Unrepaired Dural Tear during Lumbar Spine Surgery: Comparisons of Subfacial Drain with or without Subarachnoid Drain

Outcome of Incidental Unrepaired Dural Tear during Lumbar Spine Surgery: Comparisons of Subfacial Drain with or without Subarachnoid Drain To review the incidence of Incidental Dural tear (IDT) and compare the result of Subfacial drain with and without subarachnoid drain in cases of I DT which were not repaired during lumbar spinal surgery.