Incidental 18F-FDG Uptake Research Articles

Assessment of water enema PET/CT: an effective imaging technique for the diagnosis of incidental colorectal 18F-FDG uptake

BackgroundTo validate the feasibility of water enema PET/CT (WE-PET/CT) in incidental colorectal 18F-FDG uptake and improve the accuracy of diagnosing colorectal neoplastic lesions.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed the electronic records of 338 patients undergoing common PET/CT and WE-PET/CT at our hospital. PET/CT results were correlated with colonoscopy pathology and follow-up results. The ROC contrast curve was plotted to evaluate the accuracy of SUVmax on common PET/CT and WE-PET/CT for detecting neoplastic lesions. SUVmax and the median retention indexes (RIs) of cancerous, precancerous, and benign lesions and physiologic uptake were compared.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of diagnosing neoplastic lesions with common PET/CT were 84.0%, 78.3% and 80.2%, respectively. The corresponding results with WE-PET/CT were 95.8%, 96.5% and 96.2%. The AUC of SUVmax on WE-PET/CT was significantly higher than that on common PET/CT (0.935 vs. 0.524, p < 0.001). The median SUVmax on WE-PET/CT was significantly higher than that on common PET/CT in cancerous and precancerous lesions, and significantly decreased in benign lesions and physiologic uptake (p < 0.001). The RI was significantly different between cancerous lesions and physiologic uptake, between precancerous lesions and physiologic uptake, between benign lesions and physiologic uptake, and between cancerous and benign lesions (p < 0.05).ConclusionsWE-PET/CT is a noninvasive, well-tolerated and effective technique for diagnosing incidental colorectal 18F-FDG uptake. It is helpful for a timely colonoscopy and can effectively avoid an unnecessary colonoscopy for incidental colorectal 18F-FDG uptake.

Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Incidental Focal 18F-FDG Uptake in Colon on PET/CT Imaging.

Objectives:The present study aimed to identify the prevalence of focal uptake in the colon on 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) studies performed for the evaluation of malignancies other than colon, to detect the rate of malignancy in incidental focal 18F-FDG avid colonic lesions and to investigate if any possible role of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) values in the discrimination of malignant lesions from premalignant and benign ones exist.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed the files of 8,017 patients with known or suspected malignancy, who underwent whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT at our institution during the period November 2017 to November 2019. Patients showing a single site of focally increased colonic 18F-FDG uptake that was more intense compared to liver uptake on 18F-FDG PET studies and referred to colonoscopy were enrolled in the study.Results:Fifty two patients (83.8%) had at least 1 corresponding lesion on colonoscopy, whereas in 10 patients no lesion was detected. Subsequent histopathological examinations revealed no corresponding lesion in 13 (13.7%), a benign lesion in 18 (18.9%), hyperplastic polyp in 10 (10.5%), low-grade polyp in 16 (16.8%), high-grade polyp in 29 (30.5%) and malignant lesion in 9 (9.5%) of the focal 18F-FDG uptake sites. According to histopathology results, statistically no significant difference was found between the SUVmax measurements of malignant and benign cases (p>0.05) but the average SUVmax measurements of malignant cases were found to be significantly higher than lower + high-grade cases (p<0.05) and hyperplastic polyp cases (p<0.01).Conclusion:In conclusion, any unexpected focal 18F-FDG uptake in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies is suspicious for malignancy and should be clarified by colonoscopy. The intensity of 18F-FDG uptake does not preclude the application of colonoscopy and histopathological verification of the lesion if there is any.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Thyroid Incidentalomas Visualized with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Impact of Thyroid Scintigraphy in the Diagnostic Work-Up.

Our objective was to evaluate the frequency of malignancy in incidental thyroidal uptake on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in a cohort of Danish patients, and furthermore to evaluate the impact of thyroid scinti-graphy in the diagnostic work-up. All whole-body PET/CT reports from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed and further analyzed if visually increased thyroidal FDG uptake was reported. Patient electronic files were searched for further thyroid evaluation. Of 13,195 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans in 9114 patients, 312 PET/CT reports mentioned incidental thyroid FDG-uptake, and 279 patients were included in the study (3.1%). The thyroid was further investigated in 137 patients (49%), and 75 patients underwent thyroid scintigraphy. A total of 57 patients had a thyroid biopsy and 21 proceeded to surgery. Surgical specimens displayed malignancy in 10 cases, and one thyroid malignancy was found by autopsy. Hence, 11 patients were diagnosed with thyroid malignancies among 279 patients with incidental thyroid 18F-FDG uptake (3.9%). In 34 patients, a biopsy was avoided due to the results of the thyroid scintigraphy. We conclude that patients with thyroid incidentalomas can benefit from further diagnostic work-up including a thyroid scintigraphy.

Is SUVmax of 18F-FDG PET/CT Predictive Factor for Malignancy in Gastrointestinal Tract?

Increasing use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in cancer patients, has led to more common detection of 18F- FDG uptake in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). The objective of this study was to assess 18F-FDG uptake in incidental and known GIT malignancy. A total of 6500 patients followed-up in a single and tertiary center between January 2010 and September 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Of 2850 patients assessed with 18FDG-PET/CT, known GIT malignancy and 18F-FDG uptake cases during follow-up were included in the study. Of 658 patients with 18F-FDG uptake, 150 patients who underwent endoscopy were included in the study. Seventy-seven of these patients had known GIT malignancy and 73 had incidental 18F-FDG uptake. Among these 73 patients; 7 (9.6%) had malignancy, 20 (27,2%) adenoma and 24 (32.9%) inflammation that were confirmed. Endoscopy was normal in 22 (30.2%) patients. One hundred forty-three (95.3%) patients had focal and 7 (4.7%) had diffuse uptake. While no malignancy was detected in patients with diffuse uptake, 58.7% (84/143) of the patients with focal uptake presented malignancy. Mean the standardized uptake value (SUV) max values were found as 15.0 ± 10.6 (range, 3.8-56.5) in malignant disease, 10.2 ± 4.3 (range, 2.4-19.7) in adenoma, 7.3 ± 3.6 (range, 3.6-18.7) in inflammation, and 9.8 ± 4.2 (range, 3.8-19.9) in normal endoscopy groups (p < 0.001, rho = 0.378). Although this study demonstrated high probability of malignant disease with increased 18F-FDG uptake in the GIT, it would be a more appropriate approach to confirm all patients with 18F-FDG uptake through endoscopy as SUVmax values vary in a wide range.

Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the pituitary

Incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the pituitary may be detected during PET examinations. We aimed to perform a systematic review and a meta-analysis about prevalence and clinical significance of this finding. A comprehensive computer literature search, using several databases, was performed until March 2020. Pooled prevalence and rate of malignancy, including 95% confidence interval values (95% CI), were calculated on a per-examination based analysis. Five studies (180 cases of incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the pituitary) were included; most of the cases were further evaluated with MRI. The pooled prevalence of incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the pituitary was 0.33% (95% CI 0.07–0.78%). Adenomas were the most frequent lesions underlying an incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the pituitary when further evaluated with MRI (pooled prevalence: 66%; 95% CI 42–86%). The pooled rate of malignancy in cases of incidental 18F-FDG uptake further evaluated with MRI was 13% (95%CI 3–31%). Notably, a significant heterogeneity among the selected studies was found. Of note, in the available series, there were not patients with incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the pituitary treated with immunotherapy. Clinicians, radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians should be aware that incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the pituitary is an infrequent finding corresponding to benign lesions in most of the cases. Nevertheless, if the patient has normal life expectancy, MRI pituitary examination should be performed to better characterize these incidental findings due to possible clinical consequences of some pituitary incidentalomas if untreated. Further well-designed studies are needed on this topic, especially in view of the increasing frequency of immunotherapy, whose side-effects can be seen by increased 18F-FDG uptake in the pituitary.

Factors influencing incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the gallbladder in a large cohort of patients: A retrospective study

ObjectivesThis study aims to assess the incidence of incidental activity in the gallbladder and the factors that may contribute to it in a large cohort of patients undergoing 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT for cancer evaluation. Methods8096 PET/CTs were retrospectively reviewed. Data pertaining to patient demographics and PET/CT parameters were collected. Patients' records were reviewed for gallbladder disorders for up to 3 years after the exam. The presence/absence of gallbladder uptake was visually assessed. Findings were classified as focal, diffuse increased and diffuse increased wall uptake, or no uptake. Volumetric measurements of the gallbladder and SUVmax of the gallbladder, liver and blood pool were measured. Chi-square and Student's t-test were used for statistical analysis. Results54 cases (0.67%) of incidental gallbladder uptake were detected (uptake group). 162 exams without uptake were selected as control (no uptake group). The injection-to-scan interval, SUVmax of the liver and blood pool, and the gallbladder volume did not differ significantly between both groups. Higher blood glucose levels were observed in the uptake (109.9 ± 32.5) vs. no uptake group (97.4 ± 18) (p = 0.01), with levels >150 mg/dL more common in the uptake group (p = 0.004). The incidence of gallbladder disease within 3 years after imaging was higher for the uptake group (12/36) compared to the no uptake group (15/115) (p = 0.02). Diffuse increased wall uptake was more likely in the group who later developed a pathology (4/12) (p = 0.03). ConclusionIncidental gallbladder uptake in patients is independent of the injected FDG dose, injection-to-scan interval or gallbladder volume, but may be related to blood glucose level. There's a higher incidence of gallbladder pathology three years after the exam particularly in cases of diffuse increased wall uptake.

Incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the colon: value of contrast-enhanced CT correlation with colonoscopic findings.

To evaluate the impact of morphological information derived from contrast-enhanced CT in the characterization of incidental focal colonic uptake in 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations. A total of 125 patients (female: n = 53, male: n = 72) that underwent colonoscopy secondary to contrast-enhanced, full-dose PET/CT without special bowel preparation were included in this retrospective study. PET/CT examinations were assessed for focal colonic tracer uptake in comparison with the background. Focal tracer uptake was correlated with morphological changes of the colonic wall in the contrast-enhanced CT images. Colonoscopy reports were evaluated for benign, inflammatory, polypoid, precancerous, and cancerous lesions verified by histopathology, serving as a reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for detection of therapeutic relevant findings were calculated for (a) sole focal tracer uptake and (b) focal tracer uptake with correlating CT findings in contrast-enhanced CT. In 38.4% (48/125) of the patients, a focal 18F-FDG uptake was observed within 67 lesions. Malignant lesions were endoscopically and histopathologically diagnosed in eleven patients, and nine of these were detected by focal 18F-FDG uptake. A total of 34 lesions with impact on short- or long-term patient management (either being pre- or malignant) were detected. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for sole 18F-FDG uptake for this combined group were 54%, 69%, 29%, 85%, and 65%. Corresponding results for focal 18F-FDG uptake with correlating CT findings were 38%, 90%, 50%, 86%, and 80%. This resulted in a statistically significant difference for diagnostic accuracy (p = 0.0001) CONCLUSION: By analyzing additional morphological changes in contrast-enhanced CT imaging, the specificity of focal colonic 18F-FDG uptake for precancerous and cancerous lesions can be increased but leads to a considerate loss of sensitivity. Therefore, every focal colonic uptake should be followed up by colonoscopy.

Clinical Significance of Incidental 18F-FDG Uptake in Nasopharynx on PET/CT

Clinical Significance of Incidental 18F-FDG Uptake in Nasopharynx on PET/CT

Prevalence and clinical significance of focal incidental 18F-FDG uptake in different organs: an evidence-based summary

Several meta-analyses and systematic reviews have reported data about the prevalence and the malignancy risk of focal incidental uptake detected by 18F-FDG PET (FIU). This review aims to summarize the published evidence-based data about the most common sites, prevalence and malignancy risk of FIU, to derive schematic estimates in this setting. A comprehensive computer literature search of meta-analyses or systematic reviews regarding FIU and published in PubMed/MEDLINE and/or Cochrane library database through June 2017 was carried out. Twelve articles were discussed in our summary and different organs were evaluated. The pooled prevalence of FIU ranged, respectively, from 1.6 to 3.6% for colon–rectum, from 1 to 2.46% for thyroid, being 0.4% for breast, 1.8% for prostate and 0.6% for parotid. Despite that, the pooled risk of malignancy considering histology as reference standard was quite high in all organs evaluated in the summary, except for parotid gland. In fact, it ranged from 61.5 to 76% for FIU in the colon–rectum (including both premalignant and malignant lesions), from 33.2 to 37% for FIU in the thyroid gland, and it was 60 and 62%, respectively, for breast and prostate FIU. For parotid FIU pathologically proven the pooled risk of malignancy was only 20.4%. Our summary showed that the most frequent sites of FIUs are colon and thyroid according to literature data. The risk of malignancy is quite high for FIU in colon-rectum, thyroid, breast and prostate especially when histologically analyzed. Beyond the localization, when FIU are detected further investigation is warranted.

Thyroid Incidentalomas on 18F-FDG PET/CT: Clinical Significance and Controversies.

Objective:The purpose of the current study is to examine the incidence and clinical significance of unexpected focal uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the thyroid gland of oncology patients, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of benign and malignant thyroid incidentalomas in these patients, and review the literature.Methods:Seven thousand two hundred fifty-two 18F-FDG PET/CT studies performed over four years, were retrospectively reviewed. Studies with incidental focal 18F-FDG uptake in the thyroid gland were further analyzed.Results:Incidental focal thyroid 18F-FDG uptake was identified in 157 of 7252 patients (2.2%). Sufficient follow-up data (≥12 months) were available in 128 patients, of whom 57 (45%) had a biopsy performed and 71 had clinical follow-up. Malignancy was diagnosed in 14 of 128 patients (10.9%). There was a statistically significant difference between the median SUVmax of benign thyroid incidentalomas (SUVmax 4.8) vs malignant (SUVmax 6.3), but the wide range of overlap between the two groups yielded no clinically useful SUVmax threshold value to determine malignancy.Conclusion:18F-FDG positive focal thyroid incidentalomas occurred in 2.2% of oncologic PET/CT scans, and were malignant in 10.9% of 128 patients. This is the lowest reported malignancy rate in a North American study to date, and significantly lower than the average malignancy rate (35%) reported in the literature. Invasive biopsy of all 18F-FDG positive thyroid incidentalomas, as recommended by some studies, is unwarranted and further research to determine optimal management is needed. There was no clinically useful SUVmax cut-off value to determine malignancy and PET/CT may not be a useful imaging modality to follow these patients conservatively.

Clinical significance of prostate 18F-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography: A five-year review.

AIMTo determine the significance and need for investigation of incidental prostatic uptake in men undergoing 18F-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for other indications.METHODSHospital databases were searched over a 5-year period for patients undergoing both PET/CT and prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). For the initial analysis, the prostate was divided into six sectors and suspicious or malignant sectors were identified using MRI and histopathology reports respectively. Maximum and mean 18F-FDG standardised uptake values were measured in each sector by an investigator blinded to the MRI and histopathology findings. Two age-matched controls were selected per case. Results were analysed using a paired t-test and one-way ANOVA. For the second analysis, PET/CT reports were searched for prostatic uptake reported incidentally and these patients were followed up.RESULTSOver a 5-year period, 15 patients underwent both PET/CT and MRI and had biopsy-proven prostate cancer. Malignant prostatic sectors had a trend to higher 18F-FDG uptake than benign sectors, however this was neither clinically nor statistically significant (3.13 ± 0.58 vs 2.86 ± 0.68, P > 0.05). 18F-FDG uptake showed no correlation with the presence or histopathological grade of tumour. 18F-FDG uptake in cases with prostate cancer was comparable to that from age-matched controls. Forty-six (1.6%) of 2846 PET/CTs over a 5-year period reported incidental prostatic uptake. Of these, 18 (0.6%) were investigated by PSA, 9 (0.3%) were referred to urology, with 3 (0.1%) undergoing MRI and/or biopsy. No cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed in patients with incidental 18F-FDG uptake in our institute over a 5-year period.CONCLUSION18F-FDG uptake overlaps significantly between malignant and benign prostatic conditions. Subsequent patient management was not affected by the reporting of incidental focal prostatic uptake in this cohort.

Case: Incidental 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography prostate uptake: How should these patients be managed?

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is a widely used diagnostic tool for whole-body imaging, and incidental prostatic uptake occurs in approximately 1% of patients undergoing the exam. Is 18F-FDG PET/CT a reliable screening tool for prostate cancer? Should these patients undergo transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsies? Studies have indicated that 18F-FDG PET/CT has a low positive predictive value for prostate cancer and is not recommended for screening;1 however, other studies suggest that when a discrete focal 18F-FDG uptake is discovered without coincidental calcification, particularly in the peripheral zone of the prostate, further clinical evaluation is recommended. We present two patients with incidental 18F-FDG PET/CT prostatic uptake who were found to have high-grade prostate cancer. Although 18F-FDG PET/CT has not been determined to be a reliable screening tool for prostate cancer, patients with incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the prostate should be referred for urological evaluation.

Clinical Significance of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Avid Prostate Gland Incidentalomas on Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.

Objective:The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of incidental focal uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the prostate glands of cancer patients.Methods:A retrospective review of 3122 consecutive male patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT studies with an oncologic indication, over the course of four years, was performed. Studies with incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the prostate gland were further analyzed.Results:Incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the prostate gland was identified in 65/3122 men (2.1%). Sufficient follow-up data (≥12 months) were available in 53 patients, of whom 11 had a biopsy and 42 had clinical and imaging follow-up. Malignancy was histologically diagnosed in 4 out of 53 patients (7.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in 18F-FDG uptake values between benign prostate lesions [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) 7.3] and malignant ones (SUVmax 7.2, p=0.95). There was a statistically significant difference between the serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) of the benign group (n=24, PSA=2.7 ng/mL) and the malignant group (n=4, PSA=9.2 ng/mL, p<0.001). There was a direct correlation between SUVmax and Gleason score.Conclusion:18F-FDG positive prostate incidentalomas were detected in 2.1% of oncologic PET/CT scans and of these 7.5% were malignant. SUVmax was not useful for distinguishing between benign and malignant incidental prostate lesions. 18F-FDG avid prostate incidentalomas on PET/CT should prompt a recommendation for obtaining a serum PSA and further investigation if serum PSA is elevated.

Clinical Significance of Incidental Focal 18F-FDG Uptake in the Spinal Cord of Patients with Cancer

We investigated the incidence, location, and clinical significance of focal 18F-FDG uptake of the spinal cord in patients with cancer. We reviewed the medical records of 22,937 consecutive adult patients with known or suspicious malignancy who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT. PET/CT scans with incidental focal spinal cord uptake were selected and retrospectively reviewed to determine the presence, location, number, and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of any focal hypermetabolic lesions of the spinal cord. In subjects with focal spinal uptake, clinical characteristics and clinical follow-up results, including follow-up PET/CT, were reviewed. Incidental focal spinal cord uptake was observed in 69 of 22,937 adult patients (incidence = 0.3%; M:F = 31:38; age, 55.8 ± 14.7years). Seventy-eight focal hypermetabolic lesions on spinal cord in the PET/CT scans of the 69 study subjects were analyzed. The most common sites of focal spinal cord uptake were the T12 vertebra (47/78; 60.3%) and L1 vertebra (20/78; 25.6%). Multifocal cord uptake was found in 8 of 69 patients (11.6%). The average SUVmax for cord uptake was 2.5 ± 0.5 (range, 1.4∼3.9). There was no clinical or imaging evidence of abnormalities in the spinal cord, both at the time of PET/CT and during clinical follow-up. Although incidental focal 18F-FDG uptake of the spinal cord is rare in patients with cancer, it may be physiological or benign, but it should not be considered as malignant involvement. Common sites for the uptake were in the T12 and L1 spine levels.

Incidental focal 18F-FDG uptake in the frontal process of the maxilla on PET/CT: prevalence and clinical significance.

We investigated the prevalence and clinical significance of incidental focal 18F-FDG uptake in the frontal process of the maxilla, mimicking malignancy on PET/CT. From a total of 32,834 patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT, patients with focal uptake in the frontal process of the maxilla were selected by a database search. For those patients, medical records including relevant imaging studies were reviewed. Thirty-nine patients (0.12%) demonstrated focal uptake on PET/CT. On CT of PET/CT, all lesions showed ground-glass attenuation with or without bony expansion, consistent with fibrous dysplasia. When comparing previous PET/CT, follow-up PET/CT, and CT, a significant difference in degree of 18F-FDG uptake was noted, with no associated change in the size of maxillary lesions. There were no patients who had symptoms or signs related to maxillary lesions during follow-up. Focal 18F-FDG uptake in the frontal process of the maxilla is a rare, incidental, and persistent finding with variable uptake and can represent a benign condition.

Evaluation of incidental 18f-Fdg uptake of thyroid with ultrasonography and elastosonography

Evaluation of incidental 18f-Fdg uptake of thyroid with ultrasonography and elastosonography

Clinical Significance of Incidental 18F-FDG Uptake in the Pyriform Sinus Detected by PET/CT.

We investigated the significance of unexpected focal pyriform sinus FDG uptake and determined the ability of PET/CT parameters to identify malignancy. FDG PET/CT reports of 56,585 consecutive subjects were retrospectively reviewed, and 281 cases (0.50%) with focal pyriform sinus uptake were included. PET images were assessed for maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and asymmetric indices of FDG activity, and CT images were evaluated for pyriform sinus narrowing. The final diagnosis was determined by tissue biopsy, laryngoscopy, radiological findings, and clinical follow-up. Among the 281 subjects, final diagnosis was pyriform sinus malignancy in 29 (10.3%) and benignity in 215 cases (76.5%). Malignant lesions had significantly higher SUVmax (9.13 ± 3.64 vs. 3.53 ± 1.01) and asymmetric index (4.16 ± 1.81 vs. 1.54 ± 0.39) compared to benign causes. Patients with malignant lesions also had higher cervical lymph node SUVmax (6.66 ± 8.79 vs. 2.76 ± 2.46, all P < 0.001). Lesion SUVmax ≥4.24 identified malignancy with a sensitivity of 93.1% and specificity of 86.5%. Asymmetric index ≥1.81 had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89.7%. Incidentally identified focal pyriform sinus uptake on FDG PET/CT should be evaluated for possible malignancy in the presence of high SUVmax or asymmetric index.

Incidental gastrointestinal 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake associated with lung cancer.

BackgroundF-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is increasingly used for the initial staging and restaging of lung cancer. Incidental gastrointestinal findings are often observed on 18F-FDG PET/CT. The objective of this study was to assess incidental 18F-FDG uptake by the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) in patients with lung cancer.MethodsTwo hundred thirty consecutive 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations performed for lung cancer over a 3-year period were retrospectively reviewed for the presence of incidental FDG uptake in the GIT. The charts of patients with positive FDG uptake were then reviewed and analysed to determine the GIT uptake sites, the standardized uptake value (SUV) max and the final clinical diagnosis.ResultsFifty-two patients (52/230, 23 %) demonstrated incidental FDG uptake in the GIT. Thirty-three patients (63.5 %) had diffuse uptake (oesophagus, n = 2, colon, n = 31) and 19 patients (36.5 %) had focal uptake (oesophagus, n = 1, small bowel, n = 1, ascending colon, n = 5, descending colon, n = 4, sigmoid, n = 4, rectum, n = 3, and anal margin, n = 1). Twelve of the 52 patients with GIT uptake were further investigated, revealing, a diagnosis of malignancy in 4 patients with focal FDG uptake. No significant differences in mean SUVmax were observed between patients with malignant and benign GIT diseases.ConclusionThis study demonstrates a high incidence of FDG uptake in the GIT associated with lung cancer. Focal GIT uptake was frequently associated with malignant disease. These results suggest that further GIT investigations should be performed in patients with focal GIT uptake.

Thyroid lesions incidentally detected by (18)F-FDG PET-CT - a two centre retrospective study.

Background.Incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the thyroid on PET-CT examinations represents a diagnostic challenge. The maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is one possible parameter that can help in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid PET lesions.Patients and methods.We retrospectively evaluated 18F-FDG PET-CT examinations of 5,911 patients performed at two different medical centres from 2010 to 2011. If pathologically increased activity was accidentally detected in the thyroid, the SUVmax of the thyroid lesion was calculated. Patients with incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the thyroid were instructed to visit a thyroidologist, who performed further investigation including fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) if needed. Lesions deemed suspicious after FNAC were referred for surgery.Results.Incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the thyroid was found in 3.89% — in 230 out of 5,911 patients investigated on PET-CT. Malignant thyroid lesions (represented with focal thyroid uptake) were detected in 10 of 66 patients (in 15.2%). In the first medical centre the SUVmax of 36 benign lesions was 5.6 ± 2.8 compared to 15.8 ± 9.2 of 5 malignant lesions (p < 0.001). In the second centre the SUVmax of 20 benign lesions was 3.7 ± 2.2 compared to 5.1 ± 2.3 of 5 malignant lesions (p = 0.217). All 29 further investigated diffuse thyroid lesions were benign.Conclusions.Incidental 18F-FDG uptake in the thyroid was found in 3.89% of patients who had a PET-CT examination. Only focal thyroid uptake represented a malignant lesion in our study — in 15.2% of all focal thyroid lesions. SUVmax should only serve as one of several parameters that alert the clinician on the possibility of thyroid malignancy.

Incidental abnormal FDG uptake in the prostate on 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans.

18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) scans are commonly used for the staging and restaging of various malignancies, such as head and neck, breast, colorectal and gynecological cancers. However, the value of FDG PET/CT for detecting prostate cancer is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of incidental prostate 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT scans. We reviewed 18F-FDG PET/CT scan reports from September 2009 to September 2013, and selected cases that reported focal/diffuse FDG uptake in the prostate. We analyzed the correlation between 18F-FDG PET/CT scan findings and data collected during evaluations such as serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and/or biopsy to confirm prostate cancer. Of a total of 18,393 cases, 106 (0.6%) exhibited abnormal hypermetabolism in the prostate. Additional evaluations were performed in 66 patients. Serum PSA levels were not significantly correlated with maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) in all patients (rho 0.483, p=0.132). Prostate biopsies were performed in 15 patients, and prostate cancer was confirmed in 11. The median serum PSA level was 4.8 (0.55-7.06) ng/mL and 127.4 (1.06-495) ng/mL in the benign and prostate cancer groups, respectively. The median SUVmax was higher in the prostate cancer group (mean 10.1, range 3.8-24.5) than in the benign group (mean 4.3, range 3.1-8.8), but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.078). There was no significant correlation between SUVmax and serum PSA, prostatic volume, or Gleason score. 18F-FDG PET/CT scans did not reliably differentiate malignant or benign from abnormal uptake lesions in the prostate, and routine prostate biopsy was not usually recommended in patients with abnormal FDG uptake. Nevertheless, patients with incidental prostate uptake on 18F-FDG PET/ CT scans should not be ignored and should be undergo further clinical evaluations, such as PSA and DRE.