Incidence Of Venous Thromboembolism In Patients Research Articles

Incidence of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolisms in Stroke Patients.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common but preventable complication observed in critically ill patients. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is the most common type of VTE, with clinical significance based on location and symptoms. There is an increased incidence of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) in ischemic stroke patients using unfractionated heparin (UFH) for VTE prophylaxis compared with those using enoxaparin. However, UFH is still used in some patients due to its perceived safety, despite conflicting literature suggesting that enoxaparin may have a protective effect. The current study aimed to determine the incidence of VTEs in patients with acute ischemic strokes on UFH versus enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis, subclassifying the VTEs depending on their location and symptoms. It also aimed to examine the safety profile of both drugs. A total of 909 patients admitted to the Neuro-ICU with the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke were identified, and 634 patients were enrolled in the study-170 in the enoxaparin group and 464 in the UFH group-after applying the exclusion criteria. Nineteen patients in the UFH group (4.1%) and 3 patients in the enoxaparin group (1.8%) had a VTE. The incidence of DVT in the UFH group was 12 (2.6%), all of which were symptomatic, compared with 3 (1.8%) in the enoxaparin group, wherein one case was symptomatic. Nine patients (1.9%) in the UFH group developed a PE during the study period, and all of them were symptomatic. No patients in the enoxaparin group developed PE. No statistically significant difference was found between both groups. However, 18 patients in the UFH group (3.9%) experienced intracranial hemorrhage compared with none in the enoxaparin group, and this difference was statistically significant. Enoxaparin was found to be as effective as and potentially safer than UFH when used for VTE prophylaxis in stroke patients.

Rates of venous thromboembolism associated with acute psychiatric admission: A retrospective cohort study.

The present study aimed to identify rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE) amongst patients treated in inpatient mental health units using linked primary care and mental health care records. Patients resident in the London Borough of Lambeth admitted to mental health units in Southeast London between January 2008 and March 2019 were included, as well as a control group of patients being treated in the community for mental illness. The primary outcome measure was a diagnosis of VTE being recorded in GP records during or within 3 months of an admission to a mental health unit. For 7,198 psychiatric inpatient admissions, 11 episodes of VTE (1.5/1,000 admissions) were identified, with no VTE cases identified in 4,561 patients being treated in the community for mental illness during an equivalent window. This finding indicates that VTE rates following psychiatric inpatient admission might be similar to those following unselected acute medical admission. Larger scale studies are required to confirm the estimated incidence of VTE in patients with mental health conditions and the contribution of acute psychiatry hospitalisation to VTE risk.

Real-world comparative effectiveness of dalteparin and enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a preventable cause of significant morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients world-wide. In Australia, the low-molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) enoxaparin or dalteparin are usually used as first-line prophylaxis for VTE, though there is uncertainty whether dalteparin has the same effectiveness as enoxaparin in real-world settings. This is relevant because dalteparin is less renally cleared and may be more cost effective than enoxaparin. The aim of this study was to explore VTE event incidence in a general cohort of hospitalized adult inpatients who were prescribed enoxaparin or dalteparin for VTE prophylaxis. A retrospective observational study was conducted at a quaternary hospital in Brisbane, Australia, of patients who had experienced a hospital-acquired VTE from 1 September 2021 to 1 March 2023. Patients were identified from routinely collected data following an in-hospital VTE event, and further data was retrieved retrospectively from the integrated electronic Medical Record (ieMR). Incidence and type of VTE events, LMWH-prescribing patterns, and risk factors were assessed. The incidence of VTE events were similar across the dalteparin and enoxaparin cohorts (42.1 events/10 000 patients vs. 34.4 events/10 000 patients, respectively), although patients prescribed enoxaparin had a higher number of risk factors, particularly obesity and active cancer. Our research indicates comparable incidence of VTE in patients prescribed dalteparin compared with enoxaparin in an Australian hospital general cohort of adult inpatients. Dalteparin may be as effective as enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in a real-world cohort of patients, and as such dalteparin may be considered a suitable alternative to enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis. Further research including large randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these results.

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 in a Non-Intensive Care Unit.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may contribute to venous thromboembolism (VTE) with adverse effects on the course of COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to investigate an incidence and risk factors for VTE in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in a non-intensive care unit (non-ICU). Consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 hospitalized from November 2021 to March 2022 in the isolation non-ICU at our center were included in the study. Incidence of VTE including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), clinical characteristics, and D-dimer plasma levels during the hospitalization were retrospectively evaluated. Among the 181 patients (aged 68.8 ± 16.2 years, 44% females, 39% Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant, 61% Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant), VTE occurred in 29 patients (VTE group, 16% of the entire cohort). Of them, PE and DVT were diagnosed in 15 (8.3% of the entire cohort) and 14 (7.7%) patients, respectively. No significant differences in clinical characteristics were observed between the VTE and non-VTE groups. On admission, median D-dimer was elevated in both groups, more for VTE group (1549 ng/mL in VTE vs. 1111 ng/mL in non-VTE, p = 0.09). Median maximum D-dimer was higher in the VTE than in the non-VTE group (5724 ng/mL vs. 2200 ng/mL, p < 0.005). In the univariate analysis, systemic arterial hypertension and the need for oxygen therapy were predictors of VTE during hospitalization for COVID-19 (odds ratio 2.59 and 2.43, respectively, p < 0.05). No significant associations were found between VTE risk and other analyzed factors; however, VTE was more likely to occur in patients with a history of VTE, neurological disorders, chronic pulmonary or kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, obesity, and Delta variant infection. Thromboprophylaxis (83.4% of the entire cohort) and anticoagulant treatment (16.6%) were not associated with a decreased VTE risk. The incidence of VTE in patients hospitalized in non-ICU for COVID-19 was high despite the common use of thromboprophylaxis or anticoagulant treatment. A diagnosis of arterial hypertension and the need for oxygen therapy were associated with an increased VTE risk. Continuous D-dimer monitoring is required for the early detection of VTE.

Case-control analysis of venous thromboembolism risk in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis diagnosed by transient elastography.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Studies have shown a strong association between non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis. Specifically, there is paucity of data on the association of NASH and venous thromboembolism (VTE), with one such study predicting a 2.5-fold increased risk for VTE compared to other liver diseases in hospitalized patients. The mechanism is believed to be a hepatocellular injury, which causes a chronic inflammatory state leading to the unregulated activation of procoagulant factors. There has been no prior analysis of the degree of steatosis and fibrosis (measured using transient elastography, commonly known as FibroScan) in NASH and its association with VTE. To examine the association between the degree of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, quantified by transient elastography, and the incidence of VTE in patients with NASH. In our case-control study, we included patients with a documented diagnosis of NASH. We excluded patients with inherited thrombophilia, hemoglobinopathy, malignancy, alcohol use disorder, autoimmune hepatitis, and primary biliary cirrhosis. The collected data included age, demographics, tobacco use, recreational drug use, medical history, and vibration controlled transient elastography scores. VTE-specific data included the location, type of anticoagulant, need for hospital stay, and history of VTE recurrence. Steatosis was categorized as S0-S1 (mild) and S2-S3 (moderate to severe) based on the controlled attenuation parameter score. Fibrosis was classified based on the kilopascal score and graded as F0-F1 (Metavir stage), F2, F3, and F4 (cirrhosis). χ2 and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for the qualitative and quantitative variable analyses, respectively. Furthermore, we performed a logistic regression using VTE as the dependent variable. A total of 415 patients were analyzed, and 386 met the inclusion criteria. 51 and 335 patients were included in the VTE and non-VTE groups, respectively. Patients with VTE had a mean age of 60.63 years compared to 55.22 years in the non-VTE group (P < 0.014). Patients with VTE had a higher body mass index (31.14 kg/m² vs 29.30 kg/m²) and a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (29.4% vs 13.1%). The history of NASH was significantly higher in the VTE group (45.1% vs 30.4%, P < 0.037). Furthermore, moderate-to-severe steatosis was significantly higher in the VTE group (66.7% vs 47.2%, P < 0.009). Similarly, the F2-F4 fibrosis grade had a prevalence of 58.8% in the VTE group compared to 38.5% in the non-VTE group (P < 0.006). On logistic regression, using VTE as a dependent variable, diabetes mellitus had an odds ratio (OR) =1.702 (P < 0.015), and F2-F4 fibrosis grade had an OR = 1.5 (P < 0.033). Our analysis shows that NASH is an independent risk factor for VTE, especially deep vein thrombosis. There was a statistically significant association between the incidence of VTE, moderate-to-severe steatosis, and fibrosis. All hospitalized patients should be considered for medical thromboprophylaxis, particularly those with NASH.

Venous thromboembolism and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: the Venous Thrombo-Embolism and Sclerosis Lateral Amyotrophic study

BackgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a severe neurodegenerative disease. Given the inflammatory nature of ALS and the high number of ALS-related clinical circumstances (eg, prolonged immobilization and infections), patients with ALS may have a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). ObjectivesTo determine the annual incidence rate of VTE and the predictors of VTE in patients with ALS. MethodsWe analyzed a prospective cohort of patients with ALS diagnosed between 2009 and 2019 followed in the Brest University Hospital ALS Centre. ResultsAmong 227 patients with ALS, VTE occurred in 19 patients during a median follow-up period of 717 days (IQR, 488-1308), yielding an annual incidence rate of 2.93% (95% CI, 1.88%-4.53%). Predictors for VTE were a family history of VTE (hazard ratio [HR], 15.24; 95% CI, 1.72-134.84; P = .01), the presence of noninvasive ventilation at ALS diagnosis (HR, 6.98; 95% CI, 1.09-44.59; P = .04) and a short time (ie, <213 days) between first symptoms and ALS diagnosis (HR, 5.48; 95% CI, 1.57-19.11; P = .01). Recurrent VTE occurred within 3 months after stopping anticoagulation in 5 patients (26.3%). ConclusionThe annual incidence of VTE in patients with ALS is high. Predictive factors of VTE were a VTE history, noninvasive ventilation, and a short time between first symptoms of ALS and ALS diagnosis.

Abstract 13691: New Model for Prevention and Management of Venous Thromboembolism After Heart Valve Surgery

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the possible complications that can occur after heart valve surgery. Exploring effective VTE prevention and management models for post-cardiac surgery is an important issue in perioperative management. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that a new model for VTE prevention and management can effectively reduce the incidence of VTE in patients undergoing heart valve surgery. Methods: A total of 1200 patients who underwent heart valve surgery were included in this study and randomized in a 1:1 ratio into the control group and new management group. The control group received basic VTE prevention measures, while the intervention group implemented a newly designed VTE prevention and management protocol in addition to the basic preventive measures. The protocol included multidisciplinary team training and assessment, a comprehensive VTE evaluation mechanism, proper execution of preventive measures, physical and mechanical prophylaxis, patient rehabilitation training, and education. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of perioperative VTE, and secondary outcome measures included the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary embolism and all-cause mortality after heart valve surgery. Results: The intervention group included a total of 600 patients, with 57.6% being male and an average age of 56.7 ± 13.4 years. The control group also included 600 patients, with 55.5% being male and an average age of 57.5 ± 12.8 years. There were no significant differences in general clinical data between the two groups. The incidence of in-hospital deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (0.3% vs 1.5%, P&lt;0.05). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of in-hospital pulmonary embolism and early postoperative all-cause mortality. The intervention group showed a significantly higher accuracy rate in VTE risk assessment compared to the control group (91.3% vs 87.9%, P&lt;0.05). Conclusions: The new model for VTE prevention and management can effectively reduce the incidence of VTE in patients undergoing heart valve surgery, providing important evidence for the prevention and management of VTE in cardiac surgery.

Correlation Between Statin Use and Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism Incidence in Patients With Ankle Fracture: A Machine Learning Approach.

Identifying factors that correlate with the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has the potential to improve VTE prevention and positively influence decision-making regarding prophylaxis. In this study, we aimed to investigate the correlation between statin consumption and the incidence of VTE in patients who sustained an ankle fracture. In this retrospective, case-controlled study, cases were those who developed VTE and controls were those who had no VTE, and the ratio was 1:4. Patients' demographics, history of hyperlipidemia, and reported statins use were obtained. A random forest classifier (RFC) model was used to predict whether statin consumers were at risk of VTE after ankle fracture regardless of VTE prophylaxis administration based on statin consumption, body mass index (BMI), age, and biological sex. Of the 1175 patients with ankle fractures, 238 had confirmed VTE (case group), and 937 had no symptomatic VTE (control group; ratio 1:4). Fifty (21%) cases and 407 (43%) controls were on a statin. Statin users had a significantly lower incidence of VTE after ankle fracture, odds ratio (OR) = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.49, P < .001. Our model showed an area under the receiving operator curve (AUROC) of 78%, a sensitivity of 73%, and a specificity of 83% in predicting the risk of VTE. The importance of the predictors of VTE, other than the use of statins (model importance = 0.1), were age (model importance of 0.72), BMI (model importance of 0.24), and biological sex (model importance of 0.02). Statins were significantly associated with a lower rate of VTE in our population of patients who sustained an ankle fracture. 3.

Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Robotic Staging for Endometrial Cancer.

Our objectives were to estimate the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after robotic staging for endometrial cancer and to compare the incidence of VTE in patients who received a single dose of preoperative prophylaxis of enoxaparin with those who received extended postoperative prophylaxis. This study is a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent robot-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Patients were categorized into two groups: preoperative prophylaxis (PP), patients who received a single dose of enoxaparin preoperatively, and extended prophylaxis (EP), patients who received 28 days of enoxaparin postoperatively. In total, 148 patients were included, with 117 patients in the PP group and 31 patients in the EP group. The overall incidence of VTE within 30 days postoperatively was 0.67%. No significant difference was found between the PP and the EP groups (0.9% and 0%, respectively; P = 1.00). Most patients in the cohort had endometrioid adenocarcinoma (78%) with low-grade disease (70%), although there were a greater number of patients in the PP group with uterine serous carcinoma compared with the EP group (17% vs 10%; P = 0.034). The PP group had higher estimated blood loss (106 vs 81 mL; P = 0.009) and longer operative times (178 vs 151 min; P = 0.028) compared with the EP group. Significantly more patients in the PP group underwent lymph node dissection compared with the EP group (32% vs 7%; P = 0.008). The incidence of VTE following robot-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer in this study was 0.67%. No significant difference was found in VTE incidence between the PP group compared with the EP group. Mechanical prophylaxis plus a single dose of preoperative pharmacologic prophylaxis may suffice for low-risk patients following robotic surgical staging for endometrial cancer.

Comparison of Standard Versus Intermediate Prophylaxis Dose for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 Infection.

Background: COVID-19 infection is associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) events. VTE prophylaxis reduces the risk of these events. The optimal dose of VTE prophylaxis however remains uncertain. Objectives: To compare the incidence of VTE in patients treated with either standard dose VTE versus intermediate dose VTE prophylaxis. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from 1786 adult patients admitted into the hospital with polymerase chain reaction confirmed COVID-19 infection between April 2020 to September 2021. For analysis, patients were divided into 2 cohorts: either standard dose prophylaxis treatment group (patients who received either unfractionated heparin 5000units 3 times a day or enoxaparin 30-40 mg daily subcutaneously) or intermediate dose VTE prophylaxis group (patients received either unfractionated heparin 7500 units 3 times daily or enoxaparin 30-40 mg twice a day subcutaneously). The primary outcome was incidence of VTE events described as either deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Secondary outcome was bleeding events. Results: During the study period, 398 (22%) patients were primarily treated with standard dose VTE prophylaxis, whereas 1388 (78%) patients were treated with intermediate dose VTE prophylaxis. There was a significantly higher incidence of venous thromboembolism events noted in the standard dose prophylaxis treatment group when compared with the intermediate dose prophylaxis group (25/398 (6.3%) vs 35/1388 (2.5%) P < .001, [Odds Ratio 2.6197, 95% confidence interval = 1.5482-4.4327]). Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression, adjusting for age, obesity, and smoking, with the intermediate dose prophylaxis treatment group as the referent category revealed higher odds for incident venous thromboembolism events in the standard dose prophylaxis group. There was no statistically significant difference in bleeding events between the 2 treatment groups (9 (2.3%) for standard dose prophylaxis group vs 46 (3.3%) for intermediate dose prophylaxis group P = .26). Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection, patients receiving intermediate dose VTE prophylaxis experienced lower incident rates of venous thromboembolism events compared to those receiving standard dose VTE prophylaxis without a statistically significant increase in the risk of bleeding events.

Venous thromboembolism risk in cancer patients receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor versus chemotherapy.

It remains unclear if immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is associated with higher rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy (chemo) in patients with comparable cancer type, staging, and comorbidities. Using the national Veterans Affairs healthcare system database from 2016 to 2021, we performed a propensity score (PS)-weighted retrospective cohort study to compare the incidence of VTE in patients with selected stage III/IV cancer receiving first-line ICI versus chemo. The PS model utilized overlap weights to balance age, sex, race, treatment year, VTE history, paralysis/immobilization, prolonged hospitalization, cancer type, staging, time between diagnosis and treatment, and National Cancer Institute comorbidity index. Weighted Cox regressions with robust standard error were used to assess the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We found that among comparable advanced cancers, first-line ICI (n = 1823) and first-line chemo (n = 6345) had similar rates of VTE (8.49% for ICI and 8.36% for chemo at 6 months). The weighted HR was 1.06 (95% CI 0.88-1.26) for ICI versus chemo. In a subgroup analysis restricted to lung cancers, first-line ICI/chemo (n = 828), ICI monotherapy (n = 428), and chemo monotherapy (n = 4371) had similar rates of VTE (9.60% for ICI/chemo, 10.04% for ICI, and 8.91% for chemo at 6 months). The weighted HR was 1.05 (95% CI 0.77-1.42) for ICI versus chemo, and 1.08 (95% CI 0.83-1.42) for ICI/chemo versus chemo. In conclusion, ICI as a systemic therapy has a similarly elevated risk as cytotoxic chemo for VTE occurrence in cancer patients. This finding can inform future prospective studies exploring thromboprophylaxis strategies.

Outcome of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Portal hypertension in cirrhosis brings about a complex interplay in the risks of bleeding and thrombosis. It is unclear whether hospitalized patients with cirrhosis need pharmacological prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE), as it may increase the risk of bleeding. We aimed to compare the outcome of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis with and without pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. A comprehensive search of three databases was conducted from inception to August 2022 for studies comparing the outcome of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis with and without pharmacological prophylaxis for VTE. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the outcomes of VTE or bleeding. Overall, 12 studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled incidence of VTE in patients with and without thromboprophylaxis was 1.9% (95% CI: 0.8-2.9) and 1.9% (95% CI: 0.9-2.9), respectively. The odds of VTE were comparable between the groups with OR 1.11 (95% CI: 0.76-1.62). The pooled incidence of bleeding events in patients with and without thromboprophylaxis was 6.7% (95% CI: 3.6-9.8) and 10.4% (95% CI: 6.6-14.1), respectively. There was no significant difference in the odds of overall bleeding (OR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.30-1.52) or major bleeding (OR 1.18; 95% CI: 0.55-2.56) between the groups. There was no significant difference in the relative effects on sensitivity analysis. The present analysis could not demonstrate the benefit of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in reducing in-hospital VTE in patients with cirrhosis. Future studies are required to assess the role of risk prediction models in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis.

MP72-20 FREQUENCY OF HIGH GENETIC RISK SCORE FOR VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR UROLOGIC MALIGNANCIES

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 Apr 2023MP72-20 FREQUENCY OF HIGH GENETIC RISK SCORE FOR VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR UROLOGIC MALIGNANCIES Clark Judge, Zhuqing Shi, Jun Wei, Andrew Rifkin, S. Lilly Zheng, John Hollingsworth, Brian Helfand, Jianfeng Xu, and James Kearns Clark JudgeClark Judge More articles by this author , Zhuqing ShiZhuqing Shi More articles by this author , Jun WeiJun Wei More articles by this author , Andrew RifkinAndrew Rifkin More articles by this author , S. Lilly ZhengS. Lilly Zheng More articles by this author , John HollingsworthJohn Hollingsworth More articles by this author , Brian HelfandBrian Helfand More articles by this author , Jianfeng XuJianfeng Xu More articles by this author , and James KearnsJames Kearns More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003340.20AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with urologic malignancies. Risk factors for urologic patient with cancer include undergoing surgery (particularly pelvic surgery) and inherited genetic mutations. Recent GWAS have revealed multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with VTE risk. A genetic risk score for VTE (GRSVTE) has previously been validated, and may provide superior risk stratification for VTE compared with established risk calculators. The GRSVTE represents the relative risk of VTE for patients compared with the general population. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between incidence of VTE in patients with urologic malignancies and inherited genetic risk factors. METHODS: We analyzed patients with urologic malignancies from the United Kingdom Biobank (UKB), a population-based study of 500,000 volunteers age 40-69 years recruited in 2006 from the United Kingdom. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of cancer in one of the following organs: penis, prostate, testis, kidney, renal pelvis and ureter, bladder, or unspecified urinary or male genital organs. We defined GRSVTE high risk as a value>1.5. Incident VTE rates were evaluated based on primary cancer site, mutation status, and GRSVTE. Multivariable analysis adjusting for age at recruitment, gender and genetic background was performed to determine hazard ratios of VTE. RESULTS: The study cohort included 17,424 patients with urologic malignancy. Of these patients, 530 developed incident VTE. Compared to 6.3% of patients with carriers of FVL/F2, 15.13% had a higher GRSVTE (>1.5) (Table). The increased risk for VTE was similar between patients with GRSVTE>1.5 and FVL/F2. When evaluating each specific urologic malignancy, these same trends held true. CONCLUSIONS: The GRSVTE is significantly associated with incidence of VTE in patients diagnosed with urologic malignancy. The GRSVTE can explain a significantly greater proportion of patients who develop VTE compared to other genetic causes. Patients with elevated genetic risk for VTE may benefit from more aggressive monitoring or anticoagulation in the perioperative setting. Source of Funding: NA © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 209Issue Supplement 4April 2023Page: e1032 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Clark Judge More articles by this author Zhuqing Shi More articles by this author Jun Wei More articles by this author Andrew Rifkin More articles by this author S. Lilly Zheng More articles by this author John Hollingsworth More articles by this author Brian Helfand More articles by this author Jianfeng Xu More articles by this author James Kearns More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy: Incidence and Effect on Prognosis

This study evaluated the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) at the authors' institution and analyzed the risk factors associated with VTE and the overall survival (OS). One hundred and seventy patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC who received palliative chemotherapy at Daegu Catholic University Medical Center from January 2011 to December 2020 were included. During a median follow-up period of 341 days, 24 patients (14.1%) developed VTE. Cumulative incidence values of VTE were 4.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.39-9.22) at 90 days, 9.9% (95% CI, 6.14-15.59) at 180 days, and 16.9% (95% CI, 11.50-24.36) at 360 days. Multivariate analysis showed that a carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level over 1,000 U/mL (hazard ratio [HR], 2.666; 95% CI, 1.112-6.389; p=0.028) and a history of alcohol consumption (HR, 0.327; 95% CI, 0.109-0.981; p=0.046) were significant factors associated with VTE. Patients with VTE showed a shorter median survival (347 days vs. 556 days; p=0.041) than those without VTE. Multivariate analysis revealed VTE (HR, 1.850; 95% CI, 1.049-3.263; p=0.033) and CA 19-9 level over 1,000 U/mL (HR, 1.843; 95% CI, 1.113-3.052; p=0.017) to be significant risk factors associated with OS. The cumulative incidence of VTE in patients with advanced PDAC was 16.9% at 360 days. While a history of alcohol consumption was a protective factor, a high CA19-9 level was a risk factor for VTE. In addition, the occurrence of VTE was associated with poor prognosis.

Incidence and risk factors of venous thrombotic events in patients with interstitial lung disease during hospitalization

BackgroundStudies on the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) events in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) are limited and the results are inconsistent. The aim of this research was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of VTE in ILD during hospitalization.Materials and methodsIn this retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study, a total of 5009 patients diagnosed with ILD from January 2016 to March 2022 in our hospital were retrospectively included. In ILD patients, VTE including pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were screened from the electronic medical record system. Diagnosis of PTE and DVT were performed by CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA), CTV or ultrasound. And then the incidence and risk factors of VTE in different types of ILD were assessed.ResultsAmong 5009 patients with ILD, VTE was detected in 129 (2.6%) patients, including 15(0.3%) patients with both PTE and DVT, 34 (0.7%) patients with PTE and 80 (1.6%) patients with DVT. 85.1% of patients with APE were in the intermediate-low risk group. The incidence of VTE in Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies -associated vasculitis related ILD (ANCA-AV-ILD), hypersensitivity pneumonitis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) respectively was 7.9% and 3.6% and 3.5%. In patients with connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD), the incidence of VTE, DVT, PTE, combined PTE and DVT respectively was 3.0%, 2.3%, 0.4% and 0.3%. Among the various risk factors, different ILD categories, age ≥ 80 years (OR 4.178, 95% CI 2.097–8.321, P < 0.001), respiratory failure (OR 2.382, 95% CI 1.533–3.702, P < 0.001) and varicose veins (OR 3.718, 95% CI 1.066–12.964, P = 0.039) were independent risk factors of VTE. The incidence of VTE in patients with ILD increased with the length of time in hospital from 2.2% (< 7 days) to 6.4% (> 21 days).ConclusionThe incidence of VTE during hospitalization in ILD patients was 2.6%, with a 1.6% incidence of DVT, higher than the 0.7% incidence of PTE. Advanced age, ILD categories, respiratory failure and varicose veins as independent risk factors for the development of VTE should be closely monitored.

Sleep Apnea and Incident Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism: Data from the Pays de la Loire Sleep Cohort.

Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and incident venous thromboembolism (VTE). More specifically, the association between OSA and unprovoked VTE was barely evaluated. We aimed to evaluate whether apnea hypopnea index (AHI) and nocturnal hypoxemia markers were associated with unprovoked VTE incidence in patients investigated for OSA. Data from the Pays de la Loire Sleep Cohort were linked to the French health administrative data to identify incident unprovoked VTE in patients suspected for OSA and no previous VTE disease. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association of unprovoked VTE incidence with AHI and nocturnal hypoxemia markers including the time spent under 90% of saturation (T90), oxygen desaturation index, and hypoxic burden (HB), a more specific marker of respiratory events related to hypoxia. The impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was evaluated in the subgroup of patients who were proposed the treatment. After a median [interquartile range] follow-up of 6.3 [4.3-9.0] years, 104 of 7,355 patients developed unprovoked VTE, for an incidence rate of 10.8 per 1,000 patient-years. In a univariate analysis, T90 and HB predicted incident VTE. In the fully adjusted model, T90 was the only independent predictor (hazard ratio: 1.06; 95% confidence interval: [1.01-1.02]; p = 0.02). The CPAP treatment has no significant impact on VTE incidence. Patients with more severe nocturnal hypoxia are more likely to have incident unprovoked VTE.

Increased Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Results From a US Insurance Claims Database Study.

Reduced mobility in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is hypothesized to increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). A few small, single-center studies have investigated the risk of VTE in patients with ALS. Given the high morbidity and mortality associated with VTE, further understanding of the risk in patients with ALS may inform clinical care. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of VTE in patients with ALS compared with controls without ALS. Patients were identified from a US health insurance claims database, Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database, between 2004 and 2019. ALS cases were defined as patients aged 18 years or older with (1) 2 or more ALS claims at least 27 days apart including at least 1 claim from a neurologist visit or (2) 1 or more ALS claims and a prescription for riluzole or edaravone. Each ALS case was matched on age and sex to 5 controls without ALS. VTE was defined as at least 1 claim for VTE and at least 1 anticoagulant prescription or VTE-related procedure within 7 days before and 30 days after a VTE claim date. Incidence rates were reported per 1,000 person-years. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Among 4,205 ALS cases and 21,025 controls, incident VTE occurred in 132 ALS cases (3.1%) and 244 controls (1.2%). Incidence rates of VTE were 19.9 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI 16.7-23.6) in ALS cases compared with 6.0 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI 5.0-7.1) in controls. ALS cases were about 3 times more likely to develop VTE (HR 3.3, 95% CI 2.6-4.0), with similar results among men and women. The median time to first VTE was 10 months from the initial ALS claim in ALS cases. Consistent with previous smaller studies, a higher incidence rate of VTE was observed in a large sample of patients with ALS from across the United States, as compared to matched controls. The markedly increased risk underscores the importance of preventive efforts and careful monitoring for VTE in patients with ALS and may have implications for the management of ALS.

Venous thromboembolism in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, based on nationwide claim data.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a known risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, it is currently unknown which factors are associated with an increase of VTE in patients with IPF. We estimated the incidence of VTE in patients with IPF and identified clinical characteristics related to VTE in patients with IPF. De-identified nationwide health claim data from 2011 to 2019 was collected from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. Patients with IPF were selected if they had made at least one claim per year under the J84.1 [International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10)] and V236 codes of rare intractable diseases. We defined the presence of VTE as at least one claim of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis ICD-10 codes. The incidence rate per 1000 person-years of VTE was 7.08 (6.44-7.77). Peak incidence rates were noted in the 50-59 years old male and 70-79 years old female groups. Ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke, and malignancy were associated with VTE in patients with IPF, with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 1.25 (1.01-1.55), 1.36 (1.04-1.79), and 1.53 (1.17-2.01). The risk for VTE was increased in patients diagnosed with malignancy after IPF diagnosis (aHR = 3.18, 2.47-4.11), especially lung cancer [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.78, 2.90-4.96]. Accompanied VTE was related to more utilization of medical resources. Ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke, and malignancy, especially lung cancer, were related to higher HR for VTE in IPF.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with sickle cell disease undergoing noncardiovascular surgery

ObjectivePatients with sickle cell disease (SCD) will have a baseline hypercoagulable state and an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Few data are available regarding the efficacy of standard prophylaxis in preventing VTE after noncardiovascular surgery for patients with SCD. Our objective was to investigate the incidence of VTE in patients with SCD who had undergone noncardiovascular surgery. MethodsWe performed a retrospective medical record review of 352 patients with SCD who had undergone noncardiovascular surgery from August 2009 to August 2019 at Beaumont Hospitals. An equal number of control patients without SCD were propensity matched for age, sex, race, body mass index, and specific surgery. The data collected included demographics, comorbidities, VTE prophylaxis used, occurrence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), hospital length of stay, and 30-day mortality. ResultsWe found no differences in age, race, sex, ethnicity, operative time, or hospital length of stay between the SCD and propensity-matched control patients. DVT prophylaxis was used more frequently for the SCD patients than for the controls (96.0% vs 88.6%; P < .001). Four SCD patients (1.1%) had developed DVT vs five control patients (1.4%; P > .999). One patient in each group had developed PE (0.3%; P > .999). No difference was found in 30-day mortality between the SCD group and the control group (1 [0.3%] vs 3 [0.9%]; P = .312). Of those with a diagnosis of VTE ≤30 days postoperatively, no differences were present in age, sex, race, BMI, or procedure type. DVT had been diagnosed significantly later in the SCD patients than in the controls (median, postoperative day 12 vs 5; P = .014). None of the five SCD patients with VTE was a smoker compared with four of the six non-SCD patients with VTE, who were current or former tobacco users (P = .061). All the patients who had developed VTE had received DVT prophylaxis at surgery. ConclusionsWe found no differences in the perioperative rates of DVT, PE, or mortality between the SCD patients and matched control patients after noncardiovascular surgery. Vigilant attention to routine VTE prophylaxis seemed to effectively reduce the VTE risk for these hypercoagulable patients. SCD patients might need VTE prophylaxis for a longer period postoperatively compared with those without SCD.

Does Synchronous Liver Intervention Increase Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Metastatic Small-Bowel and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors?

INTRODUCTION: Previous literature suggests a higher incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) but no other gastrointestinal NET. In this study, we analyze the incidence of VTE in patients with metastatic small-bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SBNETs) and PNET undergoing synchronous liver procedures to determine whether these patients require extended VTE prophylaxis. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons NSQIP database was queried from 2008 to 2019 for patients undergoing operation for SBNET, PNET, benign small bowel, and pancreatic pathology. Patients with SBNET and PNET were stratified by additional operative procedures for liver metastasis (LM). The rate of 30-day postoperative VTE (pulmonary embolism [PE] and/or deep vein thrombosis [DVT]) was compared. Pearson’s chi-square and ANOVA tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 89,054 patients met inclusion criteria (63,396 benign small bowel, 3,073 SBNET, including 918 with LM, 18,724 benign pancreas, 3,861 PNET including 949 with LM). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of VTE in patients with small-bowel disease with or without LM. Patients in the PNET with LM group had a significantly higher rate of PE but not DVT than those undergoing pancreatic operation for benign pathology (2.4% vs 1.1%; p < 0.001). Total operation time (odds ratio [OR] 1.002; p = 0.002), length of hospital stay (OR 1.027; p < 0.001), and preoperative dialysis (OR 3.779; p = 0.004) were independently associated with VTE. However, synchronous liver intervention was not an independent factor associated with VTE or PE in patients with PNET (Table 1). Table 1. - Rates of DVT and PE in Patients with PNETs and SBNETs Undergoing Synchronous Liver Procedures Group Total Rate of DVT Rate of PE Benign small-bowel procedures 63,396 987 (1.6%) 398 (0.6%) Procedures for SBNETs 2,155 26 (1.2%) 11 (0.5%) SBNETs with synchronous liver procedures 918 12 (1.3%) 9 (1.0%) Benign pancreas procedures 18,724 400 (2.1%) 203 (1.1%) Procedures for PNETs 2,912 59 (2.0%) 44 (1.5%) PNETs with synchronous liver procedures 949 18 (1.9%) 23 (2.4%) CONCLUSION: Synchronous liver intervention does not increase the risk of VTE in patients with metastatic SBNET or PNET.