Incidence Of Respiratory Depression Research Articles

Stress Response and Analgesia During and after Robotic-Assisted Pelvic Exenteration

Introduction. Thoracic epidural analgesia or thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA) and opioid-based intravenous multimodal analgesia (MMA) provide adequate control of perioperative pain, however, comparative data are still to be gathered. Aim. To compare both anesthesia techniques in terms of stress response during and after robotic-assisted pelvic exenteration (PE). Materials and methods. 112 patients were divided into 2 equal groups A level of serum cortisol was measured at induction of anesthesia and in 2, 24, and 48 hours. The efficacy of analgesia was compared using a 10-point numeric pain scale. Analgesic administration and side effects were reported for 1–3 postoperative days. Results. Cortisol levels increased 2 hours after skin incision in the MMA group and only in 24 hours in the TEA group (p < 0.050). Postoperative cortisol levels were significantly lower in the TEA group (p = 0.001). Numeric pain scores were significantly lower in the TEA group (1.7 [1.0–3.2] vs. 2.7 [2.1–4.2]; 1.9 [1.0–3.3] vs. 3.5 [3.5–5.0]; 3.7 [3.0–4.8] vs. 4.2 [3.7–4.7], respectively; p < 0.050). Patients in the TEA group received less opioid administration (4.3 mg vs. 13.9 mg; 7.0 mg vs. 19.9 mg; 10.9 mg vs. 16.5 mg, respectively; p < 0.050). The two groups of patients were detected with no significant difference in the incidence of respiratory depression. Discussion. According to the study results, perioperative stress response was reduced with TEA being added to the anesthesia protocol. Patients in the TEA group received lower doses of analgesics. Both groups produced similar short-term postoperative outcomes. Conclusion. As compared to opioid-based MMA, TEA provided more effective analgesia and similar side effect profiles. Therefore, TEA appears to be an acceptable method for stress response suppression and pain management in patients undergoing robotic-assisted PE.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Intrathecal versus Caudal Morphine-Bupivacaine on Postoperative Analgesia and Cortisol Levels in Pediatric Patients.

Morphine is commonly used in pediatric caudal blocks. We compared the analgesic efficacy and effect on cortisol levels of intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine with caudal morphine and bupivacaine in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. Forty children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries were randomized to receive 4 μg/kg of intrathecal morphine and 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (n = 20), or caudal morphine 40 μg/kg and 0.25% bupivacaine (n = 20). Postoperative analgesia was provided with intravenous (IV) paracetamol (PCM). The primary outcome was time to reach Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) score ≥4 postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were perioperative serum cortisol levels, analgesic requirement, and parent satisfaction. Since seventy 5% of patients receiving intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine did not reach a FLACC score ≥4 within 24 hours, the primary outcome was presented as the Kaplan-Meier curve. The probability of FLACC score <4 was significantly higher with intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine than with caudal morphine and bupivacaine (P < .001). The unadjusted and adjusted (for gender) hazard ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) of occurrence of pain (FLACC score ≥4) was 0.07 (0.03-0.15, P < .001) and 0.06 (0.03-0.14, P < .001), respectively. The difference in means (95% CI) of cortisol levels between caudal morphine (with bupivacaine) and intrathecal morphine (with bupivacaine) groups were after intubation -0.667 (-4.99 to 3.65, P = .76), at 2 hours intraoperatively 7.88 (3.55-12.2, P < .001), 6 hours postoperatively 16.8 (12.5-21.1, P < .001), and 24 hours postoperatively 15.4 (11.1-19.7, P < .001) μg/dL. Intraoperatively, rescue fentanyl was required by 60% of patients on caudal morphine and bupivacaine against 20% of patients receiving intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine (absolute risk-reduction [95% CI] of 40% [12%-68%]; P = .010). Postoperative rescue fentanyl was required in 45% of patients on caudal morphine and bupivacaine and 5% of patients on intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine. All (100%) patients on caudal morphine and bupivacaine required postoperative PCM against 6 (30%) patients on intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine (absolute risk-reduction [95% CI] of 70% [50%-90%]; P < .001).The median (interquartile range [IQR]) parent satisfaction score for patients on caudal morphine (with bupivacaine) and intrathecal morphine (with bupivacaine) was 0(0-0) and 2(2-2) at 12 hours postoperatively (P < .001) and 0(0-1) and 2(1.5-2) at 24 hours postoperatively (P < .001). One patient in each group developed nausea and vomiting, and 1 patient in the intrathecal group developed pruritus. There was no incidence of respiratory depression. Intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine results in longer duration of analgesia, lower analgesic consumption, prevents surgical-stress-related elevation of serum cortisol, and improves parent satisfaction compared to caudal morphine with bupivacaine in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.

Comparing sedation protocols for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): A retrospective study

BackgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a widely used diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. Effective sedation is crucial to enhance patient comfort and optimize endoscopist performance. Various sedation protocols, including Propofol and Dexmedetomidine (Pro-Dex), Ketamine and Propofol (Keto-Fol), Propofol and Midazolam (Pro-Mid), and Propofol alone, have been utilized during ERCP. This retrospective study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of these four sedation protocols. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 600 patients who underwent ERCP between 2018 and 2021, with each patient receiving one of the four sedation protocols. Protocol assignment was based on the endoscopist's preference. Data on hemodynamic parameters, sedation level, recovery time, and procedure-related complications were collected. ResultsBaseline data showed no significant differences among the groups pre-procedure. The Pro-Dex group exhibited significantly lower mean total propofol dose, shorter recovery time, and faster achievement of Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) score 3–4 compared to the other groups. The Pro-group demonstrated significantly longer hospital stay than the other three groups (median, 4.19 ± 1.1 vs. 3.48 ± 1.2 days in the KP groups, p = 0.042). There were no significant variations in the incidence of respiratory depression, hypotension, or bradycardia among the four groups. Additionally, notable trends were found for hemodynamic measures, total propofol dosage, time to reach the desired level of sedation (as measured by the Ramsay Sedation Scale), and hospital stay based on BMI categories, indicating that higher BMI is linked to more serious outcomes. ConclusionOur retrospective study demonstrates that the Pro-Dex protocol offers superior sedation quality, faster recovery, and fewer complications compared to the other protocols during ERCP. However, the incidence of ERCP-related adverse events did not significantly differ among the four sedation protocols. These findings can aid clinicians in selecting the most appropriate sedation protocol for ERCP, considering patient and endoscopist preferences.

Analysis of Sedation Accident Records Available in the Japan Council for Quality Health Care Public Database.

Medical accidents occur frequently. However, only a few studies have been conducted on sedation-related medical accidents. This study aimed to classify sedation accidents and analyze their causes using the (Patient-management Software Hardware Environment Livewear (P-mSHELL) model. The Japan Council for Quality Health Care database on medical accidents was used. Sedation accidents that occurred during procedures between January 2010 and June 2022 were included. After examining the accident details for several variables, the accident factors were classified by factors in the P-mSHELL model, and statistical analyses, including multivariate analysis of each factor and outcome (presence or absence of residual disability), were conducted. Regarding the influence of the P-mSHELL factors on outcome, P factor (odds ratio = 6.347, 95% confidence interval = 2.000, 20.144) was a factor for having disability. There was a significant association between outcome and accident timing (that is, preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative; p =0.01). No significant association was found between the outcomes and types of drugs used (p =1, 0.722, 0.594); however, there was a significant association between the incidence of respiratory depression and multiple drug use (p <0.001). To prevent sedation accidents, it is important to monitor patients throughout the perioperative period. However, it is especially important to know the patient's condition in advance, and strict postoperative management is essential, especially for high-risk patients, to prevent serious accidents.

Randomized, Single-Blind, Comparative Study of Remimazolam Besylate vs Propofol for Facial Plastic Surgery.

Use of local anesthesia and conscious sedation with a combination of a sedative and anesthetic drug during a surgical procedure is an approach designed to avoid intubation, which produces fewer adverse events compared to general anesthesia. In the present study, a comparison was made between the efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate and propofol for facial plastic surgery. The objective was to evaluate the clinical efficacy, comfort, and incidence of adverse events of remimazolam compared with propofol combined with alfentanil in outpatient facial plastic surgery. In this randomized, single-blind, single-center, comparative study, facial plastic surgery patients were randomly divided into remimazolam-alfentanil (n = 50) and propofol-alfentanil (n = 50) groups for sedation and analgesia. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypoxemia, while secondary endpoints included efficacy and safety evaluations. There were no significant differences regarding the surgical procedure, sedation and induction times, pain and comfort scores, muscle strength recovery, heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure, but the dosage of alfentanil administered to the remimazolam group (387.5 μg) was lower than that for the propofol group (600 μg). The incidence of hypoxemia (P = .046) and towing of the mandibular (P = .028), as well as wake-up (P = .027) and injection pain (P = .008), were significantly higher in the propofol group than the remimazolam group. Remimazolam and propofol had similar efficacies for sedation and analgesia during facial plastic surgery, but especially the incidence of respiratory depression was significantly lower in patients given remimazolam.

Effect of peri operative whole high quality nursing care on psychological status, vital signs and anesthetic medication of patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy : A systematic review and meta analysis

Purpose: To investigate the impact of perioperative whole high-quality nursing care on psychological status, vital signs and anesthetic medication of patients undergoing painless gastrointestinal endoscopy, and also to provide a reference for reducing adverse risks and improving safety of painless gastrointestinal endoscopy.&#x0D; Methods: Databases such as Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were retrieved. Literature was selected based on established standards, and quality evaluations were performed to extract required data. Finally, 13 pieces of literature were included for meta-analysis of relevant data.&#x0D; Results: In a meta-analysis of 13 relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), patients receiving high-quality perioperative nursing care experienced significant improvements in self-reported anxiety and depression levels, vital signs indicators such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate, as well as decrease in narcotic drug dosage. Diagnosis and treatment time also significantly decreased (p &lt; 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of respiratory depression was reduced (p &lt; 0.00001).&#x0D; Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that perioperative high-quality nursing care alleviates the psychological stress of patients with painless gastrointestinal endoscopy, reduces the amount of anesthesia, and effectively reduces application time of endoscopy

Conscious sedation anesthesia using different doses of remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine for peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation

Background Conscious sedation anesthesia (CSA) is an anesthetic method during peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation. However, lack of optimal CSA strategies for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effects and safety of CSA using different doses of remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine during peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. Methods Patients who underwent peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement via open surgical incision were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three groups based on the tertile dose of remifentanil. The bispectral index (BIS) was used to monitor the depth of anesthesia. Data regarding clinical findings, the effects of anesthesia, and the incidence of drug-related adverse effects were collected. Results In total, 102 patients completed the surgery successfully and safely. The dose of remifentanil was 0.02–0.07 μg/kg/min, 0.08–0.13 μg/kg/min, and 0.14–0.20 μg/kg/min in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Only seven patients reported mild pain during the surgery. No significant differences were observed among the numeric rating scale scores of the three groups (p > 0.05). Intraoperative hemodynamics were stable. The incidence of respiratory depression was 8.3%, 20.0%, and 41.9% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively (p < 0.01). The incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms in Group C (51.6%) was higher than that in Groups A and B (p < 0.05). Conclusion Low-dose remifentanil (0.02–0.07 μg/kg/min) combined with dexmedetomidine achieved satisfactory anesthetic effects with fewer adverse drug reactions during PD catheter implantation, indicating its potential for use in patients undergoing PD catheter placement.

Effect of butorphanol-soaked nasal packing after endoscopic nasal surgery: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

ObjectiveThis study was designed to investigate the effect of butorphanol-soaked nasal packing on analgesia and sleep quality in patients undergoing bilateral endoscopic nasal surgery. MethodsSixty-six patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into three groups: group B1 (butorphanol 0.03mg/kg), group B2 (butorphanol 0.04mg/kg) and group N (control group). The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores evaluated by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2h (T1), 8h (T2), 24h (T3) and 48h (T4) after surgery. Secondary outcome was postoperative sleep quality measured using Subjective Sleep Quality Value (SSQV). ResultsPostoperative VAS scores of butorphanol groups were significantly lower than the control group at T2, T3 and T4. VAS scores at each time point did not differ between groups B1 and B2. On the first and second nights after surgery, SSQV was higher in butorphanol groups than in the control group. There were no significant differences in SSQV1 and SSQV2 between group B1 and group B2. The incidence of respiratory depression, dizziness, agitation and rescue analgesic use did not show difference among three groups. ConclusionsButorphanol-soaked nasal packing can reduce pain and improve sleep quality after bilateral endoscopic nasal surgery without increasing adverse effects. A concentration of 0.03mg/kg may be appropriate for clinical application. Level of EvidenceLevel 1B.

Effect of oxycodone combined with ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block on postoperative analgesia in patients with lung cancer undergoing thoracoscopic surgery: protocol for a randomised controlled study

IntroductionPostoperative pain is a main component influencing the recovery of patients with lung cancer. The combination of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) and paravertebral nerve block for postoperative analgesia in patients...

A comparative study of esketamine-dexmedetomidine and sufentanil-dexmedetomidine for sedation and analgesia in lung tumor percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA): a randomized double-blind clinical trial

ObjectiveTo observe and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Esketamine or Sufentanil combined with Dexmedetomidine for sedation and analgesia in lung tumor percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) to provide a clinical basis for the optimization of sedation and analgesia in lung tumor PRFA protocols outside the operating room.MethodsIn this trial, 44 patients aged 37 to 84 undergoing lung tumor PRFA were enrolled and assigned to Group E (n = 22, Esketamine 0.2 mg/kg) or Group S (n = 22,Sufentanil 0.1 μg/kg ). Dexmedetomidine was infused intravenously as a sedative in both groups. The modified observer’s assessment of alertness and sedation scale (MOAAS), physical movement pain scale, intraoperative vital signs, anesthesia recovery time, radiologist and patient satisfaction rates, incidence of respiratory depression, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were recorded.ResultsAlthough there was no significant difference in the physical movement pain scale, blood oxygen saturation or incidence of perioperative adverse events between the two groups during ablation, the MOAAS, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were higher in Group E than in Group S. The anesthesia recovery time was shorter in Group E than in Group S, and radiologist satisfaction was better in Group E than in Group S, but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient satisfaction.ConclusionEsketamine or Sufentanil combined with Dexmedetomidine is safe for lung tumor PRFA. However, in elderly patients with multiple underlying diseases, low-dose Esketamine combined with Dexmedetomidine has fewer hemodynamic effects on patients, milder respiratory depression, shorter recovery time, and better radiologist satisfaction because of its better controllability of sedation depth.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number#ChiCTR ChiCTR21000500 21); Date of Registration: 16/08/2021

Comparison of the analgesic effect of intrathecal morphine between laparoscopic and open living donor hepatectomy: Propensity score matching analysis.

Laparoscopic donor hepatectomy is being increasingly adopted in transplant programs due to its numerous advantages. However, the role of intrathecal morphine (ITM) in laparoscopic donor hepatectomy has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects and safety of ITM between laparoscopic and open donor hepatectomy. This retrospective study included 742 donors who underwent hepatectomy with ITM between April 2007 and June 2019. Among them, 168 and 574 donors underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and open hepatectomy (OH), respectively. Propensity score matching yielded two comparable groups of 168 donors each. The primary endpoint was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain (maximum numerical rating scale [NRS] pain score ≥ 4) within 24 postoperative hours. The LH group had a significantly lower incidence of moderate-to-severe pain within 24 postoperative hours than the OH group (16.1% vs 64.3%, P < .001). Moreover, the cumulative rescue intravenous opioids (in morphine-equivalent dose) on postoperative day (POD) 1 was lower in the LH group than in the OH group (3.3 [0-8.3] mg vs 10 [3.3-17.3] mg; P < .001). There were no significant between-group differences in the incidence of respiratory depression (2.4% vs 0.6%; P = .371) and prescriptions for pruritus (14.3% vs 15.5%; P = .878). However, the prescriptions for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly higher in the LH group than in the OH group (64.9% vs 41.7%; P < .001). The predictors of antiemetic agent prescription included the use of laparoscopic procedure (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-3.79; P = .021) and female sex (adjusted OR, 5.63; 95% CI, 3.19-9.92; P < .001). Preoperative ITM administration resulted in a significantly lower incidence of moderate-to-severe pain within 24 postoperative hours after laparoscopic donor hepatectomy than after open donor hepatectomy.

Safety and effectiveness of the combination of remimazolam tosilate and propofol in gastroscopy: a multicenter, randomized controlled, single-blind clinical trial.

Remimazolam tosilate (RT) is a new short-acting γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABAA) receptors agonist. However, its optimal use mode and dosage still remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the safety and effectiveness of the combination of RT and propofol in gastroscopy. This was a prospective, single-blind, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study. All eligible 256 patients were randomized into the following 3 groups. Patients were anesthetized with propofol (Group P), RT (Group R) or the combination of RT and propofol (Group RP). The primary efficacy endpoints were: body movement score; satisfaction of gastroscopy doctors; success rate of sedation and effects on sleep status. Sedation induction time, time to be fully alert and adverse events were also recorded. The probability of complete immobility was lower in group R (33.73%) than in group P (86.67%) and RP (83.13%). The rate of doctors' satisfaction was much lower in group R (28.92%) than in group P (77.78%) and RP (72.29%). The success rate of sedation and sleep outcome score has no difference in the three groups. The time to adequate sedation was longer in group RP (77.27 ± 18.63s) than in group P (64.47 ± 24.36s), but much shorter than that in group R (102.84 ± 46.43s). The time to be fully alert was shorter in group R (6.30 ± 1.52min) and RP (6.54 ± 1.13min) than in group P (7.87 ± 1.08min). The proportion of sedative hypotension was significantly higher in group P (41.11%) than in group R (1.20%) and group RP (3.61%) (p < 0.001). The incidence of respiratory depression was much higher in group P (17.78%) than in group R (no patient) and group RP (1.2%). The incidence of adverse events was lower in groups R (4.82%) and RP (9.64%) than in group P (31.11%). The combination of RT and propofol takes effect quickly, makes patients alert quickly, provides a sufficient depth of sedation, reduces body movement, does not inhibit circulation and respiratory function, does not affect sleep, and is the preferred mode for gastroscopy doctors and anesthesiologists.

Does the combination of intrathecal fentanyl and morphine improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar fusions?

Intrathecal morphine (ITM) has been widely effective in improving postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing a multitude of surgeries, including lumbar spine fusion. A major limitation of ITM administration is the increase in the incidence of respiratory depression in a dose-dependent manner. One way to bypass this is to use a more potent opioid with a shorter half-life, such as fentanyl. This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent one- or two-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions. The patients received one of two interventions: 0.2mg intrathecal duramorph/morphine (ITM group; n=70), 0.2mg duramorph + 50 mcg fentanyl (ITM + fentanyl group; n=68) and the control group (n=102). Primary outcomes included postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale) and opioid intake (MED - morphine equivalent dosage, mg) for postoperative days (POD) 1- 4. Secondary outcomes included opioid-related side effects. One-way analyses of variance and follow-up post-hoc Tukey's honest significant difference statistical tests were used to measure treatment effects. Significantly lower POD1 pain scores for both the ITM and ITM + fentanyl groups vs. control were detected, with no difference between the ITM vs. ITM + fentanyl groups. Similar results were found for POD1 MED intake. A multivariate regression analysis controlling for confounding variables did not attenuate the differences seen in POD1 pain scores while revealing that only the ITM + fentanyl predicted a decrease in POD1 MED intake. No differences were seen for postoperative opioid-related side effects. Our study provides support for supplementing a low dose of both intrathecal morphine and fentanyl to improve postoperative outcomes.

Comparison of buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam for seizures in children

Background: buccal midazolam and rectal diazepam are used as first-line drugs to control seizures in children. Immediate treatment and management of a continuing seizure is vital to ensure its safe, effective and prompt termination. Aim: To allow practitioners to evaluate the safety and efficacy of buccal midazolam versus rectal diazepam when treating seizures in children. Methods: A systematic review process was used to identify sources from CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library, published in English between February 1999 and June 2010 Findings: five studies, totalling 676 patients, received buccal midazolam or rectal diazepam for seizures were identified. Treatment response occurred within 293 (76%) of 386 episodes treated with buccal midazolam and 248 (65%) of 383 episodes where rectal diazepam was used. There was no significant difference between groups regarding incidence of respiratory depression. Conclusion: the reviewed articles suggest that buccal midazolam is as effective as rectal diazepam for the termination of seizures.

Study of wrist-ankle acupuncture therapy for optimizing anaesthesia scheme of painless gastroscopy and improving painless gastroscopy related complications.

Painless gastroscopy is a widely used diagnostic and therapeutic technology in clinical practice. Propofol combined with opioids is a common drug for painless endoscopic sedation and anaesthesia. In clinical work, adverse drug reactions of anaesthesia schemes are often one of the important areas of concern for doctors and patients. With the increase in propofol dosage, the risk of serious adverse drug reactions, such as respiratory depression and hypotension, increases significantly; the use of opioids often causes gastrointestinal reactions in patients after examination, such as nausea, vomiting, delayed recovery of gastrointestinal function and other complications, which seriously affect their quality of life. To observe the effect of wrist-ankle acupuncture therapy on the anaesthesia regimen and anaesthesia-related complications during and after painless gastroscopy examination. Two hundred patients were selected and randomly divided into a treatment group (n = 100) and a control group (n = 100). Both groups were routinely anaesthetized with the nalbuphine and propofol regimen, gastroscopy began after the patient lost consciousness, and given supportive treatment and vital sign monitoring. If the patient interrupted the surgery due to intraoperative torsion, intravenous propofol was used to relieve his or her discomfort. The treatment group received wrist-ankle acupuncture on this basis. The general data before treatment, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) grade and operation time between the two groups was no significant difference. The Wakeup time, and the Self-ambulation time in the treatment group was significantly faster than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The total dose of propofol in the treatment group was 109 ± 8.17 mg, significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of respiratory depression and hypotension was not significantly different, but the incidence of hiccups was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). After the examination, the incidence of nausea, vomiting, abdominal distension, and abdominal pain was 11%, 8%, 6%, and 5%, respectively, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, both the operators and the patients were more satisfied with this examination, with no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). Wrist-ankle acupuncture treatment can optimize the painless gastroscopy and anaesthesia scheme, reduces propofol total dose; shortens patient Wakeup time and Self-ambulation time, improves patient compliance and tolerance, is beneficial to clinical application.

Sufentanil combined with nalmefene reduce the adverse events in recovery period of patients undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty – A randomized controlled trial

Background: The opioid receptors related to analgesia are mainly μ recipient, the μ receptor has a two-way mode of action: manifested by opioid analgesics and μ1 Receptor binding produces the desired analgesic effect, and μ2 Receptor binding may cause respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting and other adverse reactions. Nalmefene is an opioid receptor antagonist. Low dose Nalmefene has priority over μ2 Receptor binding makes opioid analgesics turn more to μ1 receptor binding, which is reversed μ2 Receptor mediated nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression and other adverse reactions, but does not reverse the analgesic effect. We assume that sufentanil combined with nalmefene could reduce respiratory adverse events in the patients who underwent uvulopalatopharyngoplasty during recovery.Methods: Patients with UPPP under general anesthesia were selected, and divided into control group (group C) and nalmefene group (group N) randomly. Patients in group N received sufentanil 0.1 μg/kg and nalmefene hydrochloride 0.25μg/kg at the end of the operation. Additionally, patients in group C received sufentanil 0.1 μg/kg at the end of the operation. The heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were observed and recorded before operation, immediately after extubation, and 5 min after extubation. The breathing recovery time, tracheal extubation time, consciousness score (Ramsay score、sedation-agitation scale (SAS)) and visual analog score (VAS) were carefully recorded at 5 min after extubation, and the various adverse reactions were monitored during the recovery period.Results: Ninety-six patients were finished our study finally. The breathing recovery and extubation time of group N was significantly shorter than those of group C (P < 0.05). The Ramsay score after extubation in group N was significantly lower as compared to that in group C (P < 0.05). The sedation-agitation scale of group N was observed to be significantly higher than that of group C (P < 0.05). Moreover, the incidences of respiratory depression, nausea and vomiting during the recovery period was significantly less than those in group C (P < 0.05).Conclusion: Nalmefene combined with sufentanil can significantly reduce adverse reactions in the cases of patients after UPPP, which may be beneficial to improve the quality and safety of emergence after general anesthesia.

Comparison between pericapsular nerve group block and morphine infusion in reducing pain of proximal femur fracture in the emergency department: A randomized controlled study

ABSTRACT Background This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of analgesia with pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block as an adjuvant to morphine infusion for the management of preoperative pain in patients with proximal femur fractures. Methods This single-blinded, parallel-group, randomized trial enrolled 36 adult patients with proximal femur fractures who were prepared for surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In the PENG group, 18 patients received a US-guided PENG block as an adjuvant to patient-controlled morphine analgesia (PCA), while in the PCA group, 18 patients received PCA only. The primary outcome was the total morphine consumption in 24 hours before the surgery. The secondary outcomes included the visual analogue scale (VAS), need for rescue analgesia, total sleep hours, incidence of respiratory depression, hemodynamic stability, and incidence of nausea and vomiting during the first 24 hours post-procedure. Results The PENG block significantly decreased the total dose of morphine, VAS score at one-hour post-procedure, need for rescue analgesia, incidence of respiratory depression and nausea but increased the sleeping hours. Vomiting was comparable in the two groups (p = 0.121). Significantly higher mean arterial pressures from 8 to 20 hours after the block as well as heart rates immediately after the block were observed in the PENG group compared to the PCA group. Conclusion In patients with proximal femur fractures, preoperative PENG block can be used as an adjuvant to morphine infusion for controlling the pain and the total dose of morphine usage.

The efficacy and safety of remifentanil patient-controlled versus epidural analgesia in labor: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia (rPCA) and epidural analgesia (EA) has been used for pain relief in labor. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rPCA versus EA in labor, to provide evidence support for clinical analgesia and pain care. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang and Weipu databases for RCTs comparing rPCA and EA in labor until February 15, 2022. Two researchers independently screened literature and extracted data. RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis. A total of 10 RCTs involving 3086 parturients were enrolled, 1549 parturients received rPCA and 1537 received EA. Meta-analysis indicated that the incidence of intrapartum maternal fever within 1 hour of labor analgesia (OR = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.30~0.62), after 1 hour of labor analgesia (OR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.20~0.90) in the rPCA was significantly less than that of EA (all P<0.05). The incidence of respiratory depression (OR = 3.56, 95%CI: 2.45~5.16, P<0.001) in the rPCA was significantly higher than that of EA. There were no significant differences in the incidence of Apgar scores<7 at 5 minutes (OR = 1.18, 95%CI: 0.71~1.96, P = 0.53), the patients' satisfaction of pain relief during labor analgesia (SMD = 0.03, 95%CI: -0.40~0.46, P = 0.90) between rPCA and EA (all P>0.05). rPCA can be an optional alternative to EA with similar pain relief and less risk of intrapartum maternal fever. However, rPCA was associated with increased risk of respiratory depression. Future studies with rigorous design and larger sample size are needed to provide more reliable evidences for clinical rPCA and EA use.

Low dose of esketamine combined with propofol in painless fibronchoscopy in elderly patients

To explore the effects and safety of low dose of esketamine combined with propofol in elderly patients undergoing fibronchoscopy. Eighty elderly patients who underwent painless fibronchoscopy in our hospital from June 2021 to September 2021 were recruited,and randomly divided into experimental group (esketamine 0.15mg/ kg + propofol 1mg/ kg) and control group (sufentanil 0.1 μg/ kg + propofol 1mg/ kg), with 40 cases in each group. There were significant differences in MAP, HR and SpO2 of T2, T3 and T4 between the experimental and control groups (P < .05). Besides, there were significantly differences on the trend of change between the 2 groups, with a small and relatively stable fluctuation in the experimental group (P < .05). Compared with the control group, the total dosage of propofol in the experimental group was significantly lower, and the number of vasoactive drugs, the incidence of respiratory depression and bronchospasm were significantly lower (P < .05). There was no significant difference in microscopic examination time, wake-up time, visual analogue score, and agitation, mental symptoms, increased secretion, nausea and vomiting, choking cough and laryngeal spasm during awakening period between the 2 groups. The incidence of total adverse reactions in the experimental group were strongly lower than those in control group. (P < .05). Low dose of esketamine combined with propofol can be safely used for fibronchoscopy in elderly patients, with good effects, more stable respiration and circulation, and low incidence of adverse reactions.

Sedation efficacy of different dose of remimazolam with sufentanil for nerve block in young and elderly patients: a randomized, controlled study

PurposeAnxiety and pain commonly occur during nerve block, we aimed to investigate the sedation efficacy of different doses of remimazolam with sufentanil in young and elderly patients.MethodsIn this randomized trial, patients aged 18–85 years who underwent nerve block was enrolled. All patients received sufentanil 0.08 μg/kg for analgesia. Young patients (age < 65 years) were randomized into the control group (Group C, 0.9% saline), medium-dose remimazolam (Group M, 0.06 mg/kg) and high-dose remimazolam group (Group H, 0.08 mg/kg). Elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) were randomized into the Group C, low-dose remimazolam group (Group L, 0.04 mg/kg) and Group M. Primary outcome was the success rate of procedure sedation. Respiratory depression and hypoxia were the interested safety outcomes.ResultsNinety young and 114 elderly patients were enrolled, respectively. In comparison with Groups C and M, young patients in Group H had the highest success rate of procedure sedation (80.0 vs. 73.3 vs. 43.3%, P = 0.006). Elderly patients in Groups M and L had similar success rates of procedure sedation, which were significantly higher than that in Group C (78.9 vs. 78.9 vs. 50.0%, P = 0.007). In elderly patients, the incidence of respiratory depression and hypoxia tended to be higher in Group M than those in Groups L and C (both P < 0.001).ConclusionRemimazolam 0.08 mg/kg provided the best sedation efficacy in young patients while remimazolam 0.04 mg/kg with the trend of less respiratory adverse events was more optimal for elderly patients.Trial registrationhttp://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=122016.