Background: Colchicine, in multiple ways, has beneficial as well as adverse effects on patients with myocardial infarction. Objective: Our current study aims to study the efficacy as well as harmful effects of colchicine on patients with myocardial infarction. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Clinical trials till May 2024, and Randomized controlled trials were searched investigating the effect of Colchicine on patients with Myocardial Infarction. The quality of trials was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Our primary Outcomes include adverse cardiovascular events while secondary outcomes include All-cause Mortality, adverse gastrointestinal effects, levels of hs-CRP, incidence of stroke, cardiac arrest, and hospitalization urgency. Risk ratios and mean differences were pooled under the Random-effect Model. Results: Statistical analysis shows that colchicine did not impact all-cause Mortality (RR =1.00, 95% CI=0.72-1.39, P=0.98, I2=0%), cardiac arrest (RR=0.81, 95% CI=0.33-1.95, P=0.63, I2=0), incidence of stroke(RR=0.45, 95% CI= 0.17-1.19, P=0.11, I2=36%) recurrent myocardial infarction (RR=0.78, 95%CI=0.57-1.06, P=0.11, I2=11%) and levels of hs-CRP (MD= -0.87, 95% CI=-1.80-0.06, P=0.07, I2=67%). However, colchicine shows statistically significant reduction in cardiovascular events(RR=0.75, 95%CI=0.60-0.94 , P=0.01, I2= 48%) , hospitalization urgency(RR=0.46, 95% CI=0.31-0.68, P=0.0001, I2=0%) and statistically significant increase adverse gastrointestinal events (RR=1.86, CI=1.14-3.02, P=0.01, I2=79%). Conclusion: Hence, we conclude that colchicine reduces adverse cardiovascular events, hospitalization urgency and increases adverse gastrointestinal events especially diarrhea in patients with myocardial infarction. However, colchicine did not reduce all-cause deaths, cardiac arrest, stroke incidence, the incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction, and hs-CRP; we still believe that the effect of colchicine on myocardial infarction needs further investigation and encourages the researcher to conduct more trials, especially with long-term follow-up.
Read full abstract